New Inflation Numbers Keep Economic Concerns Front and Center
The eroding value of the dollar inflicts pain, and Americans resent politicians who cause it.

Inflation ticked up in the latest figures from the U.S. government's Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), released March 12. It's not a huge rise, but enough to keep the eroding value of the dollar in the headlines, feed Americans' dissatisfaction with the economy, and be received as very bad news by the White House. The president and his allies work hard to claim credit for what they tout as a thriving economy, but all they've done is link the Biden brand to rising prices and a general distaste for the president's management.
You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.
Rising Prices, Again
"The Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) increased 0.4 percent in February on a seasonally adjusted basis, after rising 0.3 percent in January," according to the BLS. "Over the last 12 months, the all items index increased 3.2 percent before seasonal adjustment."
That's a big improvement over the 9.1 percent that inflation hit in 2022. But it's still a reminder to the public that the money in their wallets buys less with each passing day. It's also an open-handed slap—though with the sting felt by consumers—to free-spending politicians who long pantomimed concern about inflation while openly pursuing policies that drove prices to rise.
"For years, economic thinkers on the left pushed for more government spending and urged the Federal Reserve to be less paranoid about inflation, with the goal of driving down unemployment as low as possible," Victoria Guida wrote last month for Politico.
President Joe Biden and company eagerly adopted the idea, pushing for not billions, but trillions of dollars in spending, deficits, and debt on the theory that Americans would like the results.
But "Americans don't seem very enthused," Guida added. "Because they really hate inflation."
Inflation Causes Pain
People dislike inflation because it's death to budgeting, savings, and financial planning. Inflation creates a race between wages and prices, making it difficult to know if income will cover the same groceries, rent, and other costs that it did in the past.
"Real average hourly earnings for all employees decreased 0.4 percent from January to February," BLS announced the same day it released CPI figures. That said, over the past year, there was "a 1.1-percent increase in real average weekly earnings" according to the same news release. But not all measures point to wages keeping up.
"Inflation-adjusted wages have shrunk by 3.7 percent since the end of 2020," the Manhattan Institute's Stephen Miran commented in November, based on the Employment Cost Index, a different BLS measure that shows wages still struggling to catch up with the declining value of the dollar. "Worse, the drop in real wages erased all gains made in the late 2010s."
Either way, it's enough to say that inflation makes life unpredictable and causes pain.
In the latest monthly survey by the Financial Times and the University of Michigan's Ross School of Business, inflation ranked as the top economic issue on people's minds as they determined their votes for president, picked by 67 percent of respondents. Almost two-thirds of respondents said they "cut back on non-essential spending, like vacations, eating out, or entertainment" in response to rising prices; half "cut back on spending for food and everyday necessities."
Unsurprisingly, people are not happy with politicians who visit inflation upon them. In that survey, 45 percent said President Biden's economic policies hurt the economy (31 percent said they helped) and 59 percent disapproved of his handling of economic issues (36 percent approved). Americans agree with the White House that the president's self-labeled "Bidenomics" have had an impact, but they don't like the results. Many economists concur, specifically when it comes to inflation.
Government Irresponsibility With Money Causes Inflation
"Inflation comes when aggregate demand exceeds aggregate supply," economist John Cochrane of the Hoover Institution and the Cato Institute wrote this month for the International Monetary Fund. "The source of demand is not hard to find: in response to the pandemic's dislocations, the US government sent about $5 trillion in checks to people and businesses, $3 trillion of it newly printed money, with no plans for repayment. Other countries enacted similar fiscal expansions and reaped inflation in proportion."
True, the spending frenzy began when Donald Trump was president, but Biden embraced the idea as his own. Now, the White House boasts of vast "generational investments" that "reverse decades of disinvestment in public goods," but there's a direct connection between a tidal wave of government borrowing and spending and the eroding value of people's money.
"The mantras of the 2010s—'secular stagnation,' 'modern monetary theory,' 'stimulus'—which preached that prosperity needed only for the government to borrow or print a huge amount of money and hand it out, are in the dustbin. You asked for it. We tried it. We got inflation, not boom," adds Cochrane.
That leaves the Biden administration wearing the consequences of the "Bidenomics" spending it touted as an albatross around its own neck. There is no escape from policies which politicians deliberately and publicly embraced when the public turns against them.
"There's a healthy amount of fear and introspection happening among the architects of these efforts that folks aren't necessarily buying what we're selling," a prominent progressive told Politico's Guida.
Brace for More of the Same
Unfortunately for anybody who fears irresponsible government largesse leading to ever-more economic chaos, the Biden administration seems determined to double down on high spending and massive borrowing in its economic policies going forward.
"For fiscal year 2025, which begins on October 1 of this year, Biden is asking Congress to spend $7.3 trillion while the federal government will collect just $5.5 trillion in taxes," Reason's Eric Boehm reported this week. "That will necessitate borrowing $1.8 trillion to make ends meet. Over the 10-year window covered by the president's budget plan, federal revenues would exceed $70 trillion, but Biden is proposing to spend $86.6 trillion."
With floods of money from the government linked to eroding purchasing power, it's interesting—for a certain value of the word—to contemplate what BLS news releases about prices and wages might look like in the years to come. And to anticipate the corresponding pain from pinched budgets.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
True, the spending frenzy began when Donald Trump was president
TDS. All inflation is caused by Biden, going back fifty years. He caused inflation in the 70s and 80s, and now he's causing it in his 70s and 80s.
Is this the bread, or the circuses?
The spending frenzy... No emergencies. Just Trump spending frenzy. Sarc angry. Biden takes emergency spending and makes it the new normal. Sarc splooges in his pants. Totally libertarian, Sarc lies.
Emergencies under Republican presidents become the new baseline budget. See 9/11, housing bubble, COVID...
And when the emergency was over, who was it that made the emergency spending “the new baseline budget”?
C’mon buddy, you’re so close to figuring something out here. Lol.
He's sooooo close.
How fucking broken are you?
Bookmarked.
This is false Sarc and you know it! The frenzy began under Bush II, and has continued ever since.
We hit 5.5% year over year inflation in summer 2008…remember what came next??
all the fools that voted for him and for the STUPIDEST VP in our history. What a punishment it will be if people don't see that he is going to die, slip out, and us be left with the consequences, which could include the raging idiot who said :
“We must together. Work together. To see where we are. Where we are headed, where we are going and our vision for where we should be. But also see it as a moment to, yes. Together, address the challenges and to work on the opportunities that are presented by this moment.” Kamala Harris
When you read that you get depressed, there is no mind there.
Took almost a second to realize I left out this statement so unworthy of even an adult with no education
"“So, Ukraine is a country in Europe. It exists next to another country called Russia. Russia is a bigger country. Russia is a powerful country. Russia decided to invade a smaller country called Ukraine. So, basically, that’s wrong, and it goes against everything that we stand for.”" Kamala Harris
I wonder: if you get high enough, will this stuff start to sound smart?
“But we all watched the television coverage of just yesterday. That’s on top of everything else that we know and don’t know yet, based on what we’ve just been able to see. And because we’ve seen it or not doesn’t mean it hasn’t happened.”
“The significance of the passage of time, right? The significance of the passage of time. So when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time.”
“It is time for us to do what we have been doing. And that time is every day. Every day it is time for us to agree that there are things and tools that are available to us to slow this thing down”
Lol. Kamala talks like she is reading an essay written by a kindergarten student.
It's like you don't even remember Dan Quayle.
Still, faint praise...
Dan Quayle was Einstein next to Kamala
Potayto potahto potatoe.
For retirees on fixed incomes, POTUS Biden has been a disaster. Their purchasing power is down nearly 20% from January 2021 (the cumulative impact of Biden-era inflation). What happens to them? Retirees on fixed incomes are forced to subsist on less, far less than they otherwise would have if POTUS Biden and his moron brigade weren't busy screwing up the economy.
SSA, while inflation adjusted, doesn't blunt the entire impact of inflation. It is a trailing adjustment.
POTUS Biden has harmed retirees on fixed incomes with his policies.
Biden's puppet masters would have him say that the rising interest rates on your pitiful savings have been a huge help to you.
Say I had been gaining 10 pounds a month; will my doctor call me healthy if I now gain only 5 pounds a month?
Or am I going to die early anyway?
Yeah, it always amazes me how people don't seem to understand the difference between a rate and a one-time change. If the RATE of inflation is two percent, that means that prices are increasing by two percent EVERY YEAR. If prices went up by two percent this year, but back down by two percent (baseline adjusted) then the inflation RATE is ZERO. Same thing for incomes: if wages go down one percent every year the gap between inflation of two percent per year and decreasing wages of one percent per year is three percent per year EVERY YEAR. Yet seemingly knowledgeable writers don't seem to try to make the difference clear.
One other population has been hurt with Bidenomics; investors. Many of whom invest via participation in 401k plans. For the typical 60/40 investor, POTUS Biden has permanently altered their trajectory in a negative way. If you look at inflation adjusted returns - aka real returns - the 60/40 investor suffered a loss in the neighborhood of -17% nominal. But when you add another -8% inflation, your real return in 2022 was -25%.
Think about what you need to earn in real terms to recover. In 2023, real returns for a 60/40 portfolio were roughly 12% (16% nominal - 4% inflation). Inflation is now 3% and holding steady, so you'll need 16% nominal to fully recover from the losses in 2022, in real terms.
For people withdrawing from their 401k plans, it is a devastating hit. Their portfolio nest egg cracked. This is what POTUS Biden has done: permanently harmed investors, and 401K participants.
Thank you! I thought I was the only person to realize that.
I bought into the invest and leave it alone theory. It worked well until 2021. I have had to be more active in investing since then.
Do the opposite = I have had to be more active in investing since then.
I lost like 20% in 2022. It took me all of 2023 to cancel it out. That isn't counting inflation just balance.
To be fair inflation is something we have endured since the creation of the Federal Reserve and it got serious when Nixon officially took us off the gold standard. Both sides of the aisle have played games with the money supply expecting the US to remain top dog and our currency to rule supreme. So this is not all Bidens fault any more than it can be said to be all Trumps fault.
What Biden and his allies did was to show weakness on the international stage and that caused international faith in our dollars to falter. He also pissed off Russia and other nations that produce oil which led to the end of the petro dollar which means most of our monetary chickens are coming home to roost. That is certainly not helping with the rate of inflation which his party has certainly tried to use as a fund to buy votes.
Trump understood the importance of keeping enemies close and making them dependant on our success so this kind of shit wouldn't happen. I don't know if his re election will be able to stop the avalanche now that Bidens crew have started it. Hard days are ahead no matter who is in charge.
Nixon took us off the gold standard in 1971, while Biden didn’t get elected to the Senate until 1973. So I think your cause and effect is off by two years.
You really are retarded
Nowhere did he say or imply Biden getting elected to the Sentae was the cause. In fact, he tries to absolve Biden somewhat.
But you are in “Defend Biden At All Costs” mode constantly, so you can’t even slow down to think about the words you are reading and what they mean in the particular order that they are placed.
Youre basically Nadler or Jayapal
Not sure how what I said can be construed as defending Biden.
Not sure if you're lying or your severe alcohol-induced brain damage makes you truly incapable of understanding.
Because youre retarded. See your first post. Your entire intention is to throw shit against the wall and caterwaul when someone criticizes Biden.
That's a big improvement over the 9.1 percent that inflation hit in 2022.
No it isn't. An "improvement" would be some measure of deflation so that prices would creep back down to the levels at which wages rose. This is simply continued bad news, though at a more restrained level of bad. The current monetary system can't continue or else we're beyond screwed.
Yes, please see my comment above about the difference between a rate and an absolute. A rate is an absolute change ($) per year. If prices rise by two percent (absoute, adjusted for baseline) this year but decline by four percent the following year, the inflation rate for the two years was zero percent. If prices rise by two percent every year for ten years, the inflation rate is two percent per year, but the absolute increase in prices adjusted over baseline was twenty percent (absolute). Then they talk about average inflation rate which was over nine percent one year and now is back down to over three percent so the average for those years was somewhere in between, while absolute prices compared to baseline are MUCH higher since the inflation RATE over those years never went below zero.
No no no, they keep saying on the news:
"The inflation numbers are lower. That means prices are coming down"
You don't mean to suggest that news reporters are a bunch of know-nothing morons, do you?
Worse. They know they’re full of shit.
The cancer continues to metastasize, but at a slower rate, so you're cancer is getting better. Nope doesn't work.
Old debts are paid back with present day dollars. Every point rise in inflation is a point decrease in the real amount owed for past debt. In a very real sense, inflation is the primary way that the government stays solvent and repays its past debts.
While this does protect the solvency of the government, it is at the expense of the taxpayers' solvency. Inflation is a form of taxation, a wealth transfer from the people to the agency printing money and controlling the rate of inflation.
Since this sweet deal seems just too good to be true for the government, governments constantly borrow more and more. Money is "free". Government can never run out of checks, they can always print more.
But this dog-chasing-its-own-tail system is just a game of musical chairs. Every now and then the piper must be paid, and the result is a bank or financial middleman goes out of business, and the rest of the government-sponsored players scramble.
How's that for a wild-eyed financial theory?
No, inflation isn't the way government stays solvent and repays its past debts. Government doesn't have to stay solvent, nor does it have to "repay" debt in any real sense since, as you point out, they can just print more money. And while, yes, inflation can reduce the burden of existing debt in theory, it's not really helping the government debt picture in that way. For one thing, they (us, the taxpayers) are paying a tidy $350 billion per year more in interest expense from 2020.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/246439/interest-expense-on-us-public-debt/
Well. Let’s do a quick back of the envelope calculation. Assume the government is still paying back debts it incurred more than 30 years ago, a not unreasonable assumption given, as you say, the government “never” has to pay back its debts. The cumulative inflation rate over the past 30 years is ~50%. When the government borrowed $350B back then, it’s paying it off with dollars worth only $175B now.
I’m no financial whiz, but even I can see how being unconcerned with inflation would work to my benefit.
IF I had a monopoly on printing money.
The cumulative inflation rate over the past TEN years is 50%.
Using the same logic as I did with DaveM's comment, $10,000 2014 dollars has the same purchasing power as $13,266.56 today, and if the compounding interval is ten years applied once, the rate appears to be about 32%.
Ok, I'm not a whiz at this. I'm going to use the govt.'s own CPI Inflation Calculator that probably tries to make the govt. look not so bad. But here I go. The CPIIC says that $10,000 of 1994 dollars has the same purchasing power as $21,226.13 2024 dollars. My senescent brain thinks that the inflation rate is about 112%, not about 50%. Where did I go wrong?
I decided to ask Copilot, who always says, "Ask me anything..." So I asked, "$10,000 in 1994 dollars has the same purchasing power as $21,226.13 2024 dollars. What is the actual average inflation rate for the past 30 years?" It replied, "In summary:
Initial Amount (1994): $10,000
Equivalent Amount (2024): $21,226.13
Cumulative Price Increase: $11,226.13
Average Inflation Rate: 2.47% per year"
Who's right? DaveM, me, the CPI Inflation Calculator, or Copilot?
Using the formula for compound interest, if inflation is like compound interest compounded once per year for 30 years, then the CPIIC and Copilot appear to be right. If the compounding interval is 30 years applied once, I think I'm right.
The most important point about all of this is that it will never, ever be fixed by voting in national elections or sending the “right” people to Washington D.C.
We can talk about ending the Fed, gold standard vs other options, the merits of deflation, etc. But these discussions are nothing but intellectual self-gratification. Not that there’s anything wrong with that.
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic."
As always, double any 21st century official inflation numbers, to get them closer to what we heard in the 1970s and 80s. And then decide how mad you are.
Apparently the voters don't resent the politicians who cause inflation, since they keep reelecting them.
inflation makes life unpredictable and causes pain.
Only if the rate is greater than 2%, right?
As a student of history, especially medieval and early modern western history, one of the leading causes of rebellions in that era was the devaluation of currency. Back when we used actual specie they adulterated the currency. Called it back, and then adulterated it with base metals. This invariably caused inflation. While it appeared to help the governments to meet their financial needs (and they were much less as people expected less of their governments at the time) it really was just an illusion. It didn't right the ship, while pissing off the people, hurt the economy by creating less demand for manufactured goods (as people shifted to using their lower value monetary spending to focusing of necessities as opposed to luxuries). This in turn caused a decrease in tax income, which further exacerbated the governments financial status, causing more rounds of currency devaluation, rinse and repeat until the house of cards invariably collapsed. History may not repeat itself but it definitely rhymes. Governmental debt should only be accrued during real crisis, not accumulated during times of stability, and be more discerning about what a real crisis is.
This^^^. Additionally, per capita per lawyer=sue the kulaks (anyone who owns anything) into oblivion.
https://www.westword.com/news/colorado-governor-wants-state-to-investigate-xcel-wind-storm-outages-20354563
Look Biden's budget isn't going to get through the GOP house. The question is if Trump wins, what is the GOP plan for handling inflation.
Wait. The inflation reduction act (cash for votes act) is not doing what it’s supposed to?
Thanks Joe Manchin.