Buffalo Cops Denied Qualified Immunity for Arresting Man Who Called Officer an 'Asshole'
R. Anthony Rupp III was cited and detained after he called a police officer an "asshole" after the cop nearly drove into two pedestrians.

Buffalo, New York, police arrested and cited R. Anthony Rupp in 2016 after he cursed at a police officer for nearly hitting two pedestrians. Now, after an already extensive legal battle, a federal appeals court has denied the officers qualified immunity, paving the way for a successful suit against the officers.
On December 1st, 2016, Rupp and his wife were leaving a restaurant around 8:30 pm, when they noticed a car, driven by Buffalo police officer Todd McAlister, "rapidly approaching" a crosswalk without headlights or running lights. According to legal documents, McAlister stopped just short of hitting two pedestrians—about two feet from them.
Seeing McAlister almost hit the two women, Rupp shouted "Turn your lights on, asshole." At the time, Rupp says that he didn't realize that the car was a police cruiser. According to the complaint, McAlister turned his car to approach Rupp and his wife, and told them that Rupp could be arrested for yelling at him. Rupp retorted that McAlister shouldn't be driving without his headlights.
McAlister then got out of his vehicle and told Rupp he was being detained. McAlister demanded identification from Rupp, who then produced his attorney identification card. As the two men began arguing about the incident, two more Buffalo police officers arrived at the scene. One of the officers eventually handed Rupp a summons for violating a local noise ordinance, and all parties departed. Rupp later complained about the interaction, and the citation against him was eventually dismissed.
Rupp decided to file a lawsuit against the officers in 2017, alleging that they violated his First and Fourth Amendment rights. However, in 2021, a federal court dismissed the case, ruling that Rupp's shout was not First Amendment-protected criticism of police, and granting the officers qualified immunity protections.
Rupp appealed this ruling, and the U.S. Second Circuit Court of Appeals ended up agreeing, overturning the lower court's ruling and reinstating the case. The circuit court ruled that the lower court erred in finding that "Rupp's shout did not concern a matter of public safety that was entitled to First Amendment protection," and found that the officers were not entitled to qualified immunity protections.
"But while a mere mistake in the performance of an official duty may not deprive the officer of qualified immunity," wrote Judge Amalya Lyle Kearse in the court's opinion. "That doctrine does not shield performance that either (a) was in violation of clearly established law, or (b) was plainly incompetent." Kearse added that no reasonable officer would believe Rupp's comment "constituted an unreasonable infringement on his own comfort and repose."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Seriously?
Over SEVEN years for this, and it is not yet even in court, just playing around with the rules?
Yeah, anyone who thinks we have a justice system is out of their ever-loving gourd.
How does making a true statement about cops,get you cited??
"an unreasonable infringement on his own comfort and repose."
. . . Seriously? That's the standard?
>Buffalo Cops Denied Qualified Immunity for Arresting Man Who Called Officer an 'Asshole'
Oh shit, is Angry Cops in trouble again?:)
It's well past time to require individual officers to carry insurance policies, and pay for it them themselves. That way cops that get sued will become uninsurable, and thus unemployable, while losing their pension as well. Instead of this nonsense where taxpayers pay for it all while the officers retire fat and happy with a fat pension.
"qualified immunity... does not shield performance that either (a) was in violation of clearly established law, or (b) was plainly incompetent."
Is this a ruling a first to acknowledge any sort of significant bounds on qualified immunity?
(a) was already well-known as a bound – though very broad, as courts often required absurd specificity when it comes to “clearly established”.
(b) “As a matter of public policy, qualified immunity provides ample protection to all but the plainly incompetent...” – Malley v Briggs. But I’ve rarely seen that cited as a defence, for obvious reasons.
If he were black instead of a white attorney, he'd be dead now.
And - never use the term 'asshole' when 'assclown' or 'asshat' are available.
>Buffalo Cops Denied Qualified Immunity for being assholes for Arresting Man Who Called Officer an ‘Asshole’
Better headline…
It is a pathetically slow, but good start.
Probably an intentional slow walk in hopes that he gives up or dies before the case actually gets anywhere.
Looks like the guy was right. These cops were not only assholes, they were stupid assholes. When will cops learn that they can't just arrest anyone for anything they make up?
When they start losing their jobs with no possibility of just changing departments like resigning from a police department ahead of a ruling and immediately joining a sheriff's department or moving out of state. Musical chairs for bad cops needs to come to an end.
They literally can arrest anyone for anything they make up. At best, later on we can get relief from the courts for the unlawful arrest. Which will do absolutely nothing to retroactively un-arrest the arrestee, or erase the consequences of the arrest from his life, relationships, and career.
Exactly this!
Arresting a man for what he said is over the top use of the policeman's power. Poor judgement on his part. The second part of the equation, what the man said to the cop deserves a slap on the hand. Our police protect us from many threats and criminals. They do not deserve to be treated like this. To call an officer a name like this, IMHO, deserves a fine of X amount of dollars with an increasing scale of dollars per offense. We as the public have gotten out of hand in the way we treat not only officers, but each other. Gone, but not forgotten, are the days of civility and we can turn that around with the help of all people. Back your police but also fine them if they do any stupid things like this officer did. It doesn't matter if he had just cause or not, he should not have done it.
It looks like the cops aren’t the only assholes.
The First Amendment protects free speech. The courts currently hold (wrongly, in my opinion) that "free speech" even includes behavior which conveys no information or opinion whatever, such as porn. But it certainly includes criticism of government officials (such as police), which can be heated and to their faces.
The onus is on the police officer to develop a thicker skin to criticism even harsh criticism.
Incompetence should not be rewarded by you licking they're boots,and whatever else you lick!
I support GOOD cops.
Assholes like the one in the article deserve NO support.
If there were good cops there wouldn't be so many bad ones.
According to legal documents, McAlister stopped just short of hitting two pedestrians—about two feet from them.
So, this cop was just minding his own business, caused no harm to anyone, and some jerk started calling him names?
I mean, yea - kinda stupid that he got out and arrested the guy, seems pretty power-abusivey and obviously wrong - but why can't we equally expect Joe Citizen to just not be a dick?
Whatever happened to politeness and civility? Why are we taking the side of some dude cursing out motorists on the streets?
Did you even read the article? The cop was driving rapidly at night without headlights and almost hit 2 people in a defined crosswalk. I'd have called him an asshole, too.
OK, but he didn't. So... why are we just shouting invective at strangers again?
Aren't we a "whatever people do so long as it doesn't harm others" kinda group here?
Who exactly did Mr. Rupp hurt other than the Police officer’s ego? Mr. Rupp was free to criticize the police officer for his actions. The officer simply should of walked away. We're the kinda group that defends a citizen’s right to criticize government actions
Sure, we can and should expect people to act decently. Arresting them for tossing common insults is not the way to express that expectation. It's a cure which is far worse than the disease.
Sure, we can and should expect people to act decently.
Can we? Should we? That doesn't sound very libertarian.
Lick those boots!
They need to get criminally charged. He absolutely should get paid as a remedy, but without criminal charges they aren't going to be deterred from doing it again.
Wow, this case really highlights the complexities of qualified immunity and its implications on law enforcement actions. It’s fascinating to see how this incident unfolded and the legal ramifications it carries. For those interested in exploring more about legal precedents and the impact on individual rights, I highly recommend checking out this informative resource: https://calcul-m2.com/ . It provides valuable insights into various legal matters and can further enrich your understanding of the issues discussed in the article.