Bipartisan Tax Credit Bonanza
Plus: California reparations bills drop, the Biden administration continues the war on gas stoves, and D.C.'s rising crime rate.

On Wednesday afternoon, the closely divided House of Representatives passed a much-heralded bipartisan $78 billion tax deal by a wide 357–70 margin.
The tax bill revives and/or expands tax credits for small businesses, families with children, and affordable housing producers.
"The Tax Relief for American Families and Workers Act is pro-growth, pro-jobs, pro-America," said Rep. Jason Smith (R–Mo.) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D–Ore.), the primary architects of the legislation, in a joint statement reported by Politico. "It's a strong commonsense bipartisan step forward in providing tax relief for working families and small businesses."
The most eye-catching part of the bill is its expansion of the Child Tax Credit. The House bill also expands the "refundable" portion of the credit that very low-income families receive, meaning they'll receive tax credits that exceed the value of their tax liability.
Republicans and Democrats have both supported child tax credits as a simple and direct means of cutting child poverty.
On the other hand, American Enterprise Institute scholars Scott Winship and Kevin Corinth have argued that the design of the tax credit will create work disincentives for low-income families, encouraging them to take part-time over full-time employment or even drop out of the labor force entirely.
"What is a refundable tax credit? It's welfare by a different name. We're going to give cash payments, checks, to people who don't even pay taxes," said Rep. Thomas Massie, (R–Ky.), per PBS. The Wall Street Journal editorial board called the child tax credit provisions a "trojan horse."
On the flip side, some Progressive Democrats voted no on the bill because it didn't expand the child tax credit enough.
The legislation allows businesses to immediately and fully deduct their development and research spending, interest costs, and capital depreciation from their tax bills. That's earned it support from free market, low-tax groups like Americans for Tax Reform.
The bill also sunsets a pandemic-era employee retention tax credit that's proven massively more expensive than expected and has been riddled with fraud.
Everyone is going to find something to like and dislike about the House bill. Perhaps the most important takeaway is that it continues America's long tradition of doing literally all policy through the tax credits.
The bill now goes to the Senate, where it's expected to have a tougher time passing.
California lawmakers are getting increasingly serious about reparations. On Wednesday, the California Legislative Black Caucus released 14 bills intended to right the wrongs of past racist policies.
The bills are wide-ranging. One would require advanced notice to be provided when grocery stores close in underserved communities. Another would restrict the use of solitary confinement. There's also a bill that would provide state funding to "specific groups," which Politico described as potentially unconstitutional.
Interestingly for property rights advocates, the bill would look to reverse past instances of "race-based" eminent domain. That bill would "restore property taken during raced-based uses of eminent domain to its original owners or provide another effective remedy where appropriate, such as restitution or compensation," said California Sen. Steven Bradford (D–Inglewood), reported Cal Matters.
Notably missing from the package is any sort of cash payments to the descendants of slaves.
The Biden administration's slow-burning war on gas stoves continues. Earlier this week, the U.S. Department of Energy released a final rule creating new, tougher energy efficiency standards for home appliances that affect both gas and electric stoves.
Earlier versions of this rule could have forced many gas stoves off the market entirely, complementing local and state efforts to ban gas appliances in new development. The administration's final rule is more modest. The Washington Post reports it will affect 3 percent of gas stoves on the market.
The Energy Department's final rule "is less stringent than the initial proposal that would have forced most gas models off the market, there really shouldn't be any such federal regulatory meddling in the decisions of consumers," said Ben Lieberman of the Competitive Enterprise Institute. He cautioned that the Biden administration is still working on tougher regulatory standards for more home appliances like dishwashers, washing machines, ceiling fans, furnaces, and water heaters.
Scenes From D.C.
The normally tranquil mood of the Reason D.C. office was interrupted earlier this week by a shooting just down the block near Dupont Circle. Our crime photographer/managing editor Jason Russell captured the subsequent police activity.

One man, possibly in a vehicle, was shot by another man who drove off, in what sounds like a possible road rage incident. The victim was taken to the hospital with a non-fatal shoulder wound.
Like most cities, D.C. saw a big increase in violent crime during the pandemic. Unlike most cities, our violent crime rate is staying persistently high.
D.C. residents vented their frustrations at city officials yesterday at a community meeting, where the D.C. Attorney General said, failing to read the room, that the city couldn't prosecute its way out of the crime wave.
During a panel, DC residents voiced their frustrations and demanded accountability from city leaders in addressing the violent crime epidemic that's plaguing our nation's capital.
DC Attorney General Brian Schwalb's response: "We cannot prosecute and arrest our way out of it." pic.twitter.com/hEUT8GG7Al
— Carrie Severino (@JCNSeverino) January 31, 2024
D.C.'s weird status as a federal district means that city officials have little control over criminal prosecutions, which are instead largely handled by the U.S. Attorney for D.C. Matthew Graves. Graves gets a lot of blame for declining to prosecute enough crimes.
All the anger being directed towards AG Schwalb for saying this needs to be directed to US Attorney Graves, the person who can actually prosecute the majority of cases in DC and chooses not to! https://t.co/kc6JuqYroh
— Billy Easley II (@billyez2) February 1, 2024
Quick Links
- Democrats are putting pressure on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to bring down interest rates.
- E.U. leaders agree to a $54 billion aid package for Ukraine.
- Israel continues its controlled demolitions of neighborhoods in Gaza.
- For just $8.5 million, you can buy the late Dianne Feinstein's home in D.C.
- A new report finds that government overreach led to "chaos" during the pandemic. Who knew?
- Taylor Swift: Pentagon psyop, or protector of the people?
https://t.co/XxJGKSze1l pic.twitter.com/zq5fEd9GmJ
— Warren Rhea ???? (@EverydayWarren) February 1, 2024
- Police who killed an armed homeowner in a wrong door raid won't face criminal charges.
No criminal charges will be filed against three New Mexico police officers who went to the wrong address while responding to a domestic violence call last year and fatally shot the armed homeowner who came to the door, state officials said. https://t.co/gMvyWybmAi
— The New York Times (@nytimes) January 31, 2024
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The normally tranquil mood of the Reason D.C. office was interrupted earlier this week by a shooting just down the block near Dupont Circle.
Hopefully the Reason Rat got away okay.
Tranquil? DC? Normally tranquil?
I don't think that word means what you think it means.
I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($550 to $750 / hr) online from my laptop. Last month I GOT chek Q of nearly 85000$, this online work is simple and straightforward, don't have to go OFFICE, Its home online job. You become independent after joining this JOB. I really thanks to my FRIEND who refer me...
This SITE————>>> http://Www.Bizwork1.com
Not likely if the rat is stuck to soon-to-be black-market sticky sheets that Reason no doubt keeps in a covert stockpile.
🙂
😉
Folks, I enjoy participating here as always, but I have several problems going on simultaneously that each require laser-focus to handle. I'll try to be back as soon as I can.
Meanwhile, enjoy bad-mouthing me behind my back and the usual Comments falderal.
🙂
😉
Gun control laws work. Therefore this never happened. Stop reporting on obvious delusions.
What is a refundable tax credit? It's welfare by a different name.
Hey, as long as you give it a different name.
A far cry from previous all taxation is theft
Yeah, but is all theft taxation?
Sometimes they cut out the middleman.
"Hey, why'd you take that guy's wallet?"
"I couldn't wait for the givermint to give it to me."
Close the border. Deport the illegals. Take the billions saved and give tax credits to all tax payers.
Let's see how the sanctuary locale support holds up under this free money onslaught.
If the actual difference between poverty and prosperity comes down to $400/year per child, it's hard not to wonder how tough the kids in "poverty" actually have it. In most major cities, that's maybe 5 tanks of gas, maybe 2-3 weeks of groceries, or rent on an additional bedroom for 1-3 months (but the parents would have to choose which of those it's going to be used for).
If actually solving a real problem could be done for just under $8/week, it'd be one of the best things for the government to be "spending" money on. If the kids are out of poverty for that $400/year, then we ought to be able to claw back the other $15-20k per year of government-funded public assistance (welfare, SNAP, Section 8, WIC, etc.. If those programs are still necessary for the families receiving that increased "tax credit", then they're not actually being lifted out of poverty, and neither are their children, in which case how much marginal good is that additional $8/week actually doing?
8 illegal immigrants in NYC attack and beat 2 officers. Before I criticize this, I need to hear the valid other side from sarc and Jeff.
https://legalinsurrection.com/2024/01/reprehensible-nypd-lashes-out-after-four-illegals-accused-of-beating-cops-are-released-without-bail/
The cops wouldn’t have gotten a beat down if they weren’t guilty of something.
Well, Jesse, if you want your criticism to be *meaningful*, and not just partisan grousing, then yes you should try to understand the situation more fully, and not just rely on a one-sided account.
Apparently, the assault occurred when the officers tried to arrest one of the migrants on another charge. We don't know the level of force that the officers used when trying to arrest the suspect. Was it excessive? Was the assault an instance of justifiable self-defense? What were the details of the other charge - was it a legitimate crime, or was it some bullshit charge? It could very well be that these migrants really are just violent thugs. Or it could be that they were acting in self-defense against an overly excessive police force. Or something else entirely.
We do know, however, that they are not "illegals", they've applied for asylum. It is legal to apply for asylum. They are here legally whether you like it or not. So it is wrong to refer to them as "illegals", and by continuing to refer to them as "illegals" you are demonstrating your contempt for the law.
And I'm pretty sure that the only reason you and your team is publicizing this local crime case so widely is to create the false impression that these migrants crossing the border are violent horrible people. They're terrorists, they're smuggling fentanyl, and now, they are violent thugs beating up NYPD cops. That is why you are pushing this story, to push a xenophobic narrative about the migrants. We will never hear anything from your team about the penniless Guatemalan women and children who come here escaping desperate situations back home. We will only ever hear about the gangbangers and the drug smugglers.
And I’m pretty sure that the only reason you and your team is publicizing this local crime case so widely is to create the false impression that these migrants crossing the border are violent horrible people.
They're using the leftist tactic of keeping a story in the news until another one comes up. That's what leftists do with school shootings and such to gin up animosity towards gun owners and demand more leftist gun control laws. Only difference is he and his team is trying to gin up hatred towards immigrants to justify rounding them up.
Look at the two leftists wanting to ignore the negative externalities of their desires.
You two never cease to fail. Lol.
Even Hochul was able to criticize the attacks. But not you two.
Sarc is so desperate to troll us by suckholing Jeffy, that Jeff is going to have him agreeing to gender reassignment surgery by spring. What's the feminine form of address for "sarcasmic"?
Sarcasmica?
Hysterasmic?
Bimbette?
"Hysterasmic" is a winner!
Well a new study did show 81% of trans have narcissistic personality disorder. Granted there are questions on the provenance of the funding source. But could pull sarc in if true.
Heard is very difficult for girls to sarcasm.
That might explain a lot here.
I think “dumb cunt” would be an appropriate handle.
By the way. Amazing you inferring others as tribalist when you run with shrike and Jeff in lock step.
At least you avoided dehumanizing language Herr Sarc unlike yesterday.
Keep behaving like the people you hate. You're just like them.
What tripe. That platitude's not even remotely true. Killing a child killer doesn't make you a child killer.
Leftists: Guns are bad! Guns cause crime! Round up the guns!
You: Illegals are bad! Illegals cause crime! Round up the illegals!
You're exactly like the people you hate.
This could be the most retarded argument ever attempted here and shows your intentional ignorance of the costs and other negative externalities of your beliefs.
A leftist would say the same thing about guns, citing murders and suicides, while intentionally disregarding instances of self defense and home protection that save lives.
You know, focusing on harm while deliberately denying that benefits exist.
Like what you do with immigrants.
You're just like the people you hate.
Honk honk!
^ Does this shit make sense to anyone? Jeff, Buttplug, you want to explain your drunken friend's forced analogy for us?
Seems to be a new story line where sarc parachutes in to defend Lying Jeffy, only to become so retarded that Lying Jeffy himself doesn’t even back him up.
I honestly don't get it unless sarc is arguing for anarchy or something.
Self defense is a fundamental right.
Breaking into a foreign country is not.
I honestly don’t get it unless sarc is arguing for anarchy or something.
He's arguing for anything and everything we aren't. We could argue for unfettered immigration, and he'd argue for full restrictions. Remember Sarc's comment about refusing to like something solely because someone he hates likes it? That's this.
Yep.
That analogy doesn't even make sense, Sarckles. I'd call it sophistry but it doesn't even rise to the level of that.
Also, why shouldn't people who've illegally entered the country be rounded up and expelled? You know, as is the law in every single fucking country on the planet.
Absolute retard tier thought there, Sarc.
Also, why shouldn’t people who’ve illegally entered the country be rounded up and expelled? You know, as is the law in every single fucking country on the planet.
The rest of the world has laws against free speech and has greater restrictions on firearms.
By your reasoning the US must do it too because, you know, they all do it.
edit: Also, passports weren't required for travel until WWI. Who was president then? Wilson. So you're praising Wilson and his legacy. I thought your team hated that guy.
Still not an intelligent retort.
Self defense is a fundamental right.
Breaking and entering is not.
Take a moment, think slowly, try to come up with a relevant response.
edit: Also, passports weren’t required for travel until WWI. Who was president then? Wilson. So you’re praising Wilson and his legacy. I thought your team hated that guy.
It still didn't mean there wasn't customs and some kind of border control, dip. Customs goes back to 1789, and immigration goes back to at least 1876.
and immigration goes back to at least 1876.
Nice to see you defend the spirit of The Page Act and the Chinese Exclusion Act.
Breaking and entering is not.
Entering the country is not breaking and entering. Unless you're a collectivist who believes in collective ownership of the land. I thought you hated collectivists. Turns out you are one! Lol!
You realize they’re crossing through individual’s property in a lot of cases, right?
And whether we like it or not, the other cases involve land and resources that are already collectivized, and funded with our tax dollars.
But you’re probably better off sticking to bumper sticker thinking.
If all of the roads and such were privatized, I’m not sure what that would really solve. It’s not like there would be one person who owned the street, it would most likely be all the property owners owned their section and gave egress easement to the other owners, thus returning it to a collective decision on who was allowed to use said private road.
"The rest of the world has laws against free speech and has greater restrictions on firearms."
Some countries do, some countries don't but saying ALL countries is a lie. What's not a lie is that every single fucking country on the planet has a law against illegal entry, for very good reason.
"Also, passports weren’t required for travel until WWI. Who was president then? Wilson."
What the fuck do passports have to do with anything? People still weren't able to enter another country illegally, passport or not. You're grasping at straws, retard.
One of these things is not like the other, one of these things just doesn’t belong.
"Leftists: Guns are bad! Guns cause crime! Round up the guns!
You: Illegals are bad! Illegals cause crime! Round up the illegals!
You’re exactly like the people you hate."
Conflating humans and inanimate objects is an...unusual attempt to "pwn" the other side.
Humans? Don't you mean vermin that are poisoning the blood of the nation?
No. I am quite capable of typing what I mean.
You, on the other hand, seem less capable of it.
Youre the one who used dehumanizing language yesterday, not me Herr Sarc.
sarcasmic 1 day ago (edited)
Flag Comment Mute User
Now the other dogs started barking too. Got the whole kennel riled up.
Youre projecting again buddy.
Either you're too stupid to know what dehumanizing means or you're being mendacious.
I can never tell the difference.
Describing people as dogs is dehumanizing language.
In sarc’s defense, he’s dumb as fuck.
You are giving him far too much credit based on his defense of dehumanizing language.
Did you know dogs are actually humans?
Drunker than fuck too.
Dehumanizing language is meant to portray the "other" as less than human. You know, calling them "vermin" or saying they are "poisoning the blood of the nation." Why is that dehumanizing? Well, what do you do with vermin? You exterminate it or face lost crops and livestock. What do you do about poison in the blood? You remove it or die.
What happens in a kennel when one dog starts barking? The rest start barking. Do you exterminate barking dogs? Do you filter them out and destroy them?
No. So it's not dehumanizing language.
Dogs are equivalent to humans?
650k dogs were euthanized in 2019. But your claim is they aren't being put down?
Jesse, he thinks guns are equivalent to humans, so he might be confused on the concept.
sarc: When one of you guys goes on the attack, the rest join in. Like dogs barking in a kennel.
JesseAz: You're using dehumanizing language! Dogs are euthanized! You're saying we're dogs to be euthanized! You're dehumanizing us! You're Hitler!
damikesc, Big Mac, ML, Dlam: What he said! What he said! What he said!
sarc: *facepalm*
Is Sarc upset that people notice his, jeffys, and the pedo's co-dependent relationship as the pathetic thing that it is?
“Dehumanizing language is meant to portray the “other” as less than human.”
I don’t understand why calling someone a dog or a chimp doesn’t count. Unless you’re arguing that it inherently has to have the possibility of violence behind it?
Also, comparing you guys to "dogs" is an insult to man's best friend, not to you.
Thank you for clarifying Herr Sarc.
♪ Sarckles, Sarckles uber alles ♫
'Apparently, the assault occurred when the officers tried to arrest one of the migrants on another charge.'
Could people who have learned they can do and take what they want feel oppressed by any legal intervention?
Of course they can. Oppression is a matter of what the oppressor does to the victim. It isn't about the moral beliefs of the victim.
Have you watched the video Lying Jeffy?
They did not. Just like they didn't watch the video QB provided of the pro life protest while they defended 11 years for peaceful protest.
bUt ThEY cOUld hAvE Had a leGitIMatE ReAsOn tO RePeaTeDlY kIcK a MaN LaYiNg oN tHe GrOuNd iN tHe hEad.
They were misgendered and then the officer's talked smack about climate change.
I'm going to go with statistically speaking, illegal, because virtually all claims of asylum are false, and made knowing the claim is false in a straight attempt to defraud the system. It seems highly unlikely that these fellows are the few with valid claims.
Of course, in the broken system we have today, all such claims must be deemed valid until rejected. But all those claimants should be detained in refugee camps until such time as their claims are dropped (and hence they are deported) or their claims are rejected (and hence they are deported), or their claims are upheld.
You can’t make them stay in camps!!!1!1!1!
Apparently you can’t even make them stay in jail after a violent assault.
They were released without bail.
"And I’m pretty sure that the only reason you and your team is publicizing this local crime case so widely is to create the false impression that these migrants crossing the border are violent horrible people. "
The "false impression" of an illegal assaulting a cop and suffering no penalties for doing so? Sounds like it is not that false an impression here.
Lol. Justifiable self defense? What about the 7 or 8 outstanding dreamers that kicked the cops in the head while they were on the ground?
You are parody. There can be no doubt about that anymore.
Unfortunately no, he really is this dishonest.
"Apparently, the assault occurred when the officers tried to arrest one of the migrants on another charge. We don’t know the level of force that the officers used when trying to arrest the suspect. Was it excessive? Was the assault an instance of justifiable self-defense? What were the details of the other charge – was it a legitimate crime, or was it some bullshit charge? It could very well be that these migrants really are just violent thugs. Or it could be that they were acting in self-defense against an overly excessive police force. Or something else entirely."
Even if the arrest in question was complete and total bullshit, taking a swing at the cops involved creates an entirely valid assault charge, not to mention giving the reveiw boards and courts an excuse to "justify" any ensuing force used by the cops after that point.
When it comes to interactions with law enforcement, some fights aren't necessarily worth the cost. Shortly after I bought my house in an unincorporated area of L.A. County (Sheriff's jurisdiction, not in any Municipality), I had a city PD officer approach me in my driveway, on my property and demand to see my ID after I told him that I'd never heard of the person he asked me about; I'm 99% certain that the cop in question wasn't justified in demanding that, and I'd have been well within my rights to refuse (he could have simply run the plates of the car I'd just got out of, which is registered to me at that exact address, and found out who I am), but in the moment I decided I'd rather be done with the encounter than spend 20-60 minutes and possibly even be detained and taken to the city's police HQ then have to find a lawyer to help me prove that the request was illegal over a few dozen billable hours and wasting my vacation time from work just to ultimately be vindicated.
If it was instead "8 Trump supporters attack and beat 2 officers" you'd be tripping over yourself to justify the attack while bringing up saint you know who.
Do you have a citation of that occurring? My guess is you'll say J6. But go to the original story and I condemned the violence. What I dont condemn is the other 900 people arrested and thrown in jail who didn't commit violence. You know the shit you and Jeff, who love state abuse, support. Lol.
Do you have a citation of that occurring?
Jan. 6, 2021
Jeff. Were you able to expend a few extra calories and read the rest of the post?
Maybe these officers should have shot the migrants.
chemjeff radical individualist 3 years ago
Flag Comment Mute User
What is there to talk about?
.
From a libertarian perspective, Ashli Babbett was trespassing, and the officers were totally justified to shoot trespassers. Again from a libertarian perspective, the officers would have been justified in shooting every single trespasser. That would not have been wise or prudent, of course.
.
They were all trespassers trying to be where they weren’t supposed to be.
Lol.
He’s just being dishonest.
It's Jeffy, so that's par for the course.
I don't think creamjeff can be anything else.
It's called "castle doctrine". It's called the legitimate using force in self-defense. Something that every libertarian or even every conservative ought to support. Except you and the Trumpalos, for whom the Trump crowd is always right and everyone opposing the Trump crowd is always wrong. Principles be damned.
You do realize “castle doctrine” applies to private property, right, not public property? And DC doesn't have a strong respect for "castle doctrine" anyway.
The *concept* of the castle doctrine is not specific to any type of ownership. The officer was acting in defense of himself and the other occupants of the building.
You do understand that Ashli Babbitt was the aggressor here, right? She, and the mob she was with, smashed windows trying to gain access, right?
I know this is Wiki, but you want an agreed-upon definition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_doctrine
In all of these laws, they refer to private, not public land. They do not apply to such places as a state capitol or the US Capitol which are distinctly public. Your assertion that castle doctrine applies is utter, total, and complete bullshit.
Ashli Babbit was legally trespassing (a crime for which the death penalty is very rarely invoked by prosecutors) at the time she was shot. She, as a US Citizen, was also theoretically a part-owner of the building in which she, and others were trespassing.
In recent months, the left has frequently taken to saying with regard to what's happening at the southern border, "I see immigration, but no invasion here", but many (maybe most/all) of those same people can look at J6 and only see an "insurrection"? Could it be that there's nothing about a riot and some theft/vandalism that would create a pretext to clear the 11/2024 ballot of Joe Biden's principal opponent (who has never even been formally charged with having incited any part of it, much less convicted)? (the DNC lawfare machine is working around the clock to do the same to as many "3rd party" candidates as they can manage as well.
Since when does the Castle doctrine come into play when it is not your house nor your property in the first place?
Holy fucking shit, castle doctrine? You have no fucking idea what you're talking about. It can NOT ever apply to a public building.
This is one of the worst ways possible to justify the shooting of a rioter on Capitol grounds.
Yeah right. You'd be justifying the attack in the name of the canonized martyr of your Church of Trump. Everyone knows this.
do you have an example sarc?
Is there a single J6 yahoo you have not defended? No. There is not.
Ray Epps.
I'll believe it when I see it.
Lol, fucking clown.
I wasn't really even intending that as a 'gotcha'. But damn.
"I’ll believe it when I see it."
Multiple different videos of Epps calling for the crowd to attack the Capitol have only been posted here about forty-seven-thousand times, so that's fair to think that you might have missed it.
He's got you there. Pulling Misek's trick of demanding proof of absence as an excuse to reject the premise that a particular statement was never made. Will the next move include busting out the phrase "properly applied logic" in reference to the opposite of the actual established rules of logic?
Great point.
Whats funny is that sarc thinks support requires agreeing woth the state abuses.
BLM protestors who fire bomb a car getting less time than the guy who put feet on Pelosi desk. Sarc thinks this is a just libertarian stance to applaud this.
Then again, sarc is an idiot.
Sarc thinks this is a just libertarian stance to applaud this.
You think they shouldn't have been sentenced at all because not fair not fair not fair waaaah.
It's odd that you, who seem to believe ACAB, somehow believes a cop is in the right shooting an unarmed woman in the Capitol Building.
Is there a difference between the cops, or are just local and state cops bastards, but federal ones aren't?
It’s odd that you, who seem to believe ACAB
Because the vast majority of news stories about cops are for bad behavior. It’s a selection bias in the stories, not me.
somehow believes a cop is in the right shooting an unarmed woman in the Capitol Building.
I back the blue when they’re right. In this case, as you very well know, the cop didn’t know she was unarmed and from his vantage point he couldn’t see the crowd. He just saw someone crawling through a smashed barricade while hearing chaos on the police radio. So based upon what he knew based upon what he could see and hear, he did what he thought was right.
You know all of this, but you dishonestly say “shot an unarmed woman” to make it look like she was just whistling along, minding her own business, and then pow dead for no reason.
And I’d be absolutely shocked if you framed that event with a shred of honesty.
It’s a selection bias in the stories, not me.
Odd that you can grasp what selection bias is for this, but not for ENB's Roundup.
I back the blue when they’re right.
Odd, considering your posting history and comments regarding cops.
Do you do self-awareness, dude?
Like I said, I'd be shocked if you said something honest.
I mean I literally just told you exactly what I think. Word for word.
Sarc is again justifying the Babbitt killing because the cop didn't have a good line of sight. Lol.
Bookmarked.
Bookmarked.
Awesome. When you use the bookmark people with brains might read my entire comment and see how you lie by cherry picking and omission.
BLM protestors who fire bomb a car getting less time than the guy who put feet on Pelosi desk. Sarc thinks this is a just libertarian stance to applaud this.
*Rational people* understand that the sentence of a crime should be based on the *specific details* surrounding that crime, and that trying to compare one to another is, most of the time, an apples-to-oranges comparison.
It is only you and your tribe who thinks that the Jan. 6 riots and the BLM riots are in some way directly comparable and that both should receive exactly the same treatment despite the very different circumstances of each.
I agree they are not remotely comparable.
BLM killed people and caused billions in damage.
1/6 was a mostly peaceful protest.
But good to see that you think fire bombs deserve less punishment than putting one's feet on a desk.
Oof.
Fire-bombing a car is "mostly peaceful", just ask CNN.
By contrast, it's a slippery slope from feet on a desk to the complete overthrow of the US Government.
The important thing to remember about J6 is that a few hundred disorganized and unarmed people with no prior planning came within seconds of doing what 10 million or more gun owners with 20-30 million AR15s or similar "assault weapons" wouldn't have any chance at if they were to organize and try it.
If you reject that narrative, you must hate freedom. Kind of like if you think there should be two or more names on a ballot, you're an "existential threat to democracy" and a "domestic terrorist". Having more than one option to choose from in an election just increases the probability of voters making the "wrong" choice, after all...
This police officer:
https://twitter.com/DarrenJBeattie/status/1748093147857469654
There are plenty. You can see even in the original thread. Those who committed violence. But their treatment and time sentenced should be the same as the BLM protestors.
Unlike you I'm for the equal administration of law.
Unlike you I’m for the equal administration of law.
No, you use unequal administration of law as justification to commit unlawful acts.
When has he ever done that? For a guy who constantly complains about people making stuff up about you, you're sure not shy in making up stuff about others.
I used to say self awareness wasn't your superpower, but in reality you're probably just a hypocrite.
Your team's mantra is that it's ok because they did it first. From Trump all the way down to the J6 yahoos, nobody should be punished because Democrats or Floyd riots. Saying that your team shouldn't be punished is justifying unlawful acts.
So the argument youre complaining we have is equal application of the law. Got it.
Sarcasmic's cool with the uneven application of law, got it.
Wokies can attack the White House and burn down DC without even a slap on the wrist, while everyone else gets thirty years for "parading", and Sarcasmic doesn't think that's a problem because "wHaTaboUtiSM".
I never said I was cool with it. I said it doesn’t justify unlawful acts. You say it does.
No, they didn’t sarc. Jesus H Science.
No, they didn’t sarc. Jesus H Science.
If someone claims that their team deserves no punishment because of something the other team did first, then they are justifying unlawful acts.
They're not saying the words "These unlawful acts were justified." Not directly. So one could get all lawyerly and say they never actually said that. But when they say their guys should get off Scott-free, they're justifying unlawful acts.
If they claimed that, I would disagree, but they are still only asking for equal treatment under the law, not excusing the underlying conduct.
What if someone conversely said, if you're going to punish the J6 protesters, you have to arrest the violet antifa and BLM rioters too?
That if you're going to jail someone for disrupting an official proceeding of congress, it might be fair to look into the people who interrupted the Kavanaugh hearings? Or any other number of such events?
They're simply pointing out the hypocrisy and political nature of how the law is applied.
If they claimed that, I would disagree, but they are still only asking for equal treatment under the law, not excusing the underlying conduct.
But they never get around to actually admitting the underlying conduct is in fact illegal. They just bitch and moan endlessly about the prosecution.
Hypocrisy, properly understood, is applying different standards to different situations that are in fact the same, or at least very very similar. The situations that you invoke are not the same, and not even all that similar. For example:
What if someone conversely said, if you’re going to punish the J6 protesters, you have to arrest the violet antifa and BLM rioters too?
All of these involve different specific individuals who committed different individual acts with different mens rea, different circumstances, different jurisdictions, etc. It is not hypocritical at all to demand that different situations that are IN FACT DIFFERENT should be treated differently. Don't fall into the Jesse trap of mistaking "partisan equity" for "equal treatment".
That if you’re going to jail someone for disrupting an official proceeding of congress, it might be fair to look into the people who interrupted the Kavanaugh hearings? Or any other number of such events?
Again - different situations that have only superficial similarity. The only thing that they have in common was that the work of Congress was temporarily interrupted. But the Jan. 6 riots were about stopping the peaceful transfer of power. That is far worse than just staging a noisy protest.
“But go to the original story and I condemned the violence.”
We have all, routinely, condemned the violence and property damage. We don’t have to do it every time we have this conversation. Tha fuck?!
Look at Lying Jeffy just lie like it’s breathing.
Chemjeff, the Kavanaugh riots were about stopping the peaceful transfer of power. Kennedy needed to be replaced after retiring, and the Senate confirmation hearings and swearing in was the process of doing that, which the rioters tried to stop. The rioters didn't want to let the confirmation process play out. So I'm assuming you will agree that the two are very similar, if, in fact, the Jan 6 riot was about stopping the peaceful transfer of power, as you claim. So now you will stop with the stupid--this isn't the same so you can't ask for equal application of the law for the Jan 6ers--version of a No True Scottsman logical fallacy.
I believe, from what you've previously posted, that you have a problem with cops getting Qualified Immunity when they violate people's rights. The courts justify it by falling back on the excuse that the exact same method/mode/scenario of rights violations weren't previously cited to reject qualified immunity in the past, so the bad cops retain QI. That is similar to how you keep trying to say the BLM riots/Kavanaugh riots were different somehow, because it wasn't EXACTLY the same. It's a bad argument used to justify QI for bad cops, just as it's a bad argument used to excuse selective prosecution and joke sentences for Kavanaugh rioters (while Jan 6ers got much harsher sentences).
sarc,
If you're saying that the participants in one riot deserve more severe punishment than participants in another riot based on the difference in what you think the participants in each riot happened to believe, then you're really arguing for punishment of thoughtcrime and/or controversial speech (at least the versions you happen to disagree with).
I'd love to see an argument in favor of that concept which isn't in direct conflict with 1A. If you're thinking of bringing terms like "insurrection" or "coup" to the party, it's important to note that fewer than 10, if any of the J6 rioters were charged with anything along those lines; legally that's a distinction which doesn't enter into the discussion for anyone not charged with anything related to such an action.
Did this sound like an intelligent retort in your head?
Because it comes across as proving my assertion regarding your beliefs.
Yup, this is right. Jesse commits the utopian fallacy every time he brings up "equal application of the law".
"Because the rest of the world is not 100% fair and perfect, therefore me and my team get to break the law."
You know everyone else can read the posts right?
"Equal administration of law", if that phrase is to have any meaning, implies that two people who breaks the law in very similar ways ought to be treated very similarly by the law. But that isn't what Jesse is arguing. His position is more like "Partisan equity of law administration". That is, a Republican who breaks the law should be prosecuted only if a Democrat who breaks a somewhat similar law is also prosecuted, even if the two situations are noticeably different. So Jesse would claim that Trump should be prosecuted for the stolen documents only if Biden or Obama or Hillary were prosecuted for stolen documents, even though all four of those situations were all very different.
Basically Jesse's position, and that of his kennel mates around here, is that any Republican anywhere gets to commit any crime because Hillary Clinton walks free.
Do you have evidence of this? Seems like you're making stuff up.
Do you have evidence of this? Seems like you’re making stuff up.
Seriously dude? The standard defense of Trump is "Whatabout Hillary? Whatabout Obama? Whatabout Biden?"
Doesn't matter what he or any other Republican does, it's always justified with "They did it first, that makes it ok!"
Ask Jesse if he thinks Trump broke the law.
"Seriously dude? The standard defense of Trump is “Whatabout Hillary? Whatabout Obama? Whatabout Biden?”
Doesn’t matter what he or any other Republican does, it’s always justified with “They did it first, that makes it ok!”"
A link to that being said will suffice.
Your word is not good for much.
"Ask Jesse if he thinks Trump broke the law."
What law do you argue he broke?
Anyone who's ever held a security clearance and been through information handling briefings would confirm that HRC storing classified information on an internet-connected computer (not to mention transmitting it unencrypted via gmail) is a far more dangerous "compromise" than any number of hard-copy files stored in either the Mar-a-lago basement/office/safe, or Joe Biden's garage (although if Hunter had any of his "business associates" over to the house while he was renting it from his dad, that might be a different story).
For unauthorized people to access a hard copy, they have to have physical access to and be present at the location where that piece of paper is stored. To access electronic files on a computer connected to the inernet, any sufficiently skilled hacker in the world doesn't even need to get out of bed (or even dress to a level that would be legally required to leave their home wherever they happen to live), and to access gmail traffic, they simply have to trick someone like Sid Blumenthal to tell them his password... The less said about the classified information that was left in the hands of someone as compromised as Anthony Weiner (via his personal relationship with Hillary's assistant), the better.
The one bit of genius that Hillary figured out which trump didn't (or couldnt?) figure out was to use "lawyers" in all of the key roles of her criminality, so they could be put "on retainer" throughout the whole sequence, which doubly complicates any attempt to "flip" them since everything they know is both potentially privileged and also shielded by 5A since they'd all potentially be indictable as co-conspirators. Even if a prosecutor figured out a way around the "attorney-client" protection, then nobody could easliy be compelled to provide any information about anything since it could all be self-incriminating.
To be fair, you've argued that there was no violence until the police deployed crowd control measures (like rubber bullets and smoke), which is definitely a defense of those who committed violence.
I said the primary/majority of the violence occurred after crowd control methods of gas and rubber bullets were deployed based on available video.
Now if you want to claim this is wrong because a cop got pushed slightly prior, we have different standards of violence.
Under most versions of law, even a mild push could qualify as "assault" if the recipient claims it was unwanted/offensive. I did jury duty in L.A. on a case where it was explained that even spitting toward someone could be legally charged as "assault" depending on how the person spat near chose to interpret the incident; I'm guessing that the law for simple assault is pretty similar everywhere in the US since it's generally based on English Laws from the Colonial or pre-Colonial era.
Wrong spot.
What I dont condemn is the other 900 people arrested and thrown in jail who didn’t commit violence.
Are property crimes "violence"?
You know most of the people charged didn’t commit any property damage either. This has been shown multiple times.
And most of the people who went into the Capitol have not been prosecuted either.
The people who were prosecuted are: people who committed acts of physical violence, people who were a part of some organized conspiracy (e.g. Proud Boys), and people who went into one of the House or Senate chambers, or a specific place that they knew they were not supposed to be in that is not open to the public, like Pelosi's office. I believe there was at least one other person who was prosecuted who didn't fall under any of the above, but only because he violated the terms of some previous court order unrelated to Jan. 6.
If I'm wrong, show me an example of such.
And furthermore, from a libertarian perspective, property crimes are just as serious as violent crimes because both are violations of one's rights.
It wasn't a joke because we didn't harshly sentence EVERYBODY who was there.
....a whole lot of them on laughably absurd charges and sentences, but not every single person.
Like the one person who murdered somebody that day. He was not prosecuted, was he?
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/US/im-ashamed-woman-breached-capitol-receives-probation-1st/story?id=78445859
https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/30-months-jan-6-attack-capitol
According to DOJ, more than half of the people charged have been put on trial so far, and more than half of those tried have been sentenced to prison time.
Fewer than 10% of all people charged were charged with theft or destruction of government property.
About 60% of those charged plead guilty, with 75% of those being misdemeanors.
FBI claims there's another 300+ people out there who are "believed to have committed violence", but only seems to have proof in 14 of those cases. With the degree of politicization of DoJ which seems to be the norm in the Obama and Biden administrations, it's hard to guess at how credible the suspicion on the other 96% of those cases might or might not be.
And that's just the people they've gone after who were there. Now, let's talk about those who were miles away at the time being dragged to court, tried, and convicted over J6 even though they were in a city far away at the time.
Like who?
Enrique Tarrio for one.
"If it was instead “8 Trump supporters attack and beat 2 officers” you’d be tripping over yourself to justify the attack while bringing up saint you know who."
I suppose this is a relevant response to the story in some parts of the world...
8 illegal immigrants in NYC attack and beat 2 officers
Hmmm. Maybe this is a good time to build a collosseum.
California lawmakers are getting increasingly serious about reparations.
Serious about such an unserious topic. Are they attempting to lure people back to the state with this?
If they are they're using dynamite for their fishing expedition. Paying for this will destroy the California economy so badly it will make Detroit look like a paradise of opportunity.
it will make Detroit look like a paradise of opportunity.
North Korea might end up being the more valid comp once all is said and done.
Will Newsom get chunkier?
He'll look like a cross between Kim Jong-Un and Christian Bale.
If they are they’re using dynamite for their fishing expedition.
If this goes through, we'll be able to ask, "Used enough dynamite there, Gavin?", as California's finances get blown sky high.
It would destroy the economy of CA and bankrupt the state coffers, but then there will be another pandemic or some other emergency. Then they can get bailed out by the taxpayers who fund the federal government, as they were during Covid for their ridiculous state-employee pension program.
So many questions:
Do wealthy black residents qualify for reparations?
How many black junkies die after receiving their allocation?
Can anyone identify as black?
How much does LeBron owe the uuigers for literally profiting off of slavery?
Will the descendants of black slave owners qualify?
Skin color, not history, is the most important thing
They're "getting serious" in the same way they "got serious" about establishing single payer health care in the state a number of years ago.
The State Assembly will pass the bill trying to do it, but it'll die when it gets to the part where they have to come up with a regime of new taxes to pay for it all and figure out that even the slavishly left wing and deeply gerrymandered voters in their districts won't tolerate anything that would actually generate even a fraction of the revenue that'd be needed to pay for it.
Walmart to open 150 stores as retail shopping makes a comeback
By Social Links forLisa Fickenscher
Published Jan. 31, 2024, 12:32 p.m. ET
https://nypost.com/2024/01/31/business/walmart-opening-150-stores-as-retail-shopping-makes-comeback/
Wow, Biden economy smoking hot.
Sandy, you will recall how I pointed out how Wal-Mart was closing Sam's club stores right before the Trump Recession?
Look at this difference.
#ProudCapitalistPig
Walmart, it’s where people with money shop!
It is where I shop.
Where do people with no money shop? Outside of California, I mean.
Wal-mart sells spittin' tobacky, Mountain Dew, pork rinds - everything a Trumper needs to live right.
All you did was to read off Jeffy's shopping list.
It's also where Buttplug buys his
baitcandy.Still less than 2018 dummy.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/269425/total-number-of-walmart-stores-in-the-united-states-by-type/
I recall you're a laughably inept Democrat cheerleader who decides if the economy is good or bad depending on which party holds the White House.
In 2018 the economy was in ruins because Sam's Club closed a few stores.
In 2022 the economy was fantastic despite widespread consumer dissatisfaction with inflation and Wall Street's worst year since 2008.
#DefendBidenAtAllCosts
Ironically 2018 was the peak per the link above.
Is buttplug a conservative commenter's alt that he uses to post nonsense so he can make fun of it?
Nah, he's a cautionary tale of what can happen when you spend your childhood huffing paint fumes and eating glue.
Apparently you end up becoming a retarded child porn posting pedophile.
He also enjoys child porn
There definitely is an element of If he was *trying* to make Biden supporters look like idiots, what would he be doing differently?
A smart Biden supporter would have spent 2022 admitting people were justified in their disapproval of rising prices and tanking investments. The tone should have been "Sure, things are bad now. But by November 2024 they might improve enough that Biden gets reelected because of the economy - not despite it."
PB couldn't manage that level of nuance though. He spent the year insisting everything was fine and inflation was a non-issue. And inflation being a non-issue is so ridiculous even Biden and the rest of his party don't buy it. Since, y'know, they called their ambitious economic package the Inflation Reduction Act.
"Is buttplug a conservative commenter’s alt that he uses to post nonsense so he can make fun of it?"
I used to think that he and Jeff were actually Tucker Carlson astroturfing.
I could see Jeff being a Tucker bit.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Hey, stupid, you missed this very important part somehow:
That means they're merely replacing some older, smaller stores with their more common (and preferred) supercenter format.
Turd doesn’t read his own links.
turd has a heaping helping of STUPID to go with his constant dishonesty.
Not in Chicago.
Biden is never going to date you.
Buy stock in plexiglass manufacturers if many of those stores are in CA.
Some sort of lower-tier retail was always going to be needed to fill the gap for all of the high-end department stores which are shutting down around the country. I guess the fact that it's Wal-Mart is a slightly more encouraging sign than if it had been Family Dollar (or their UK affiliate Pound Town).
The Biden administration's slow-burning war on gas stoves continues.
I WAS TOLD NO ONE WAS COMING FOR MY GAS STOVE.
They just took your R410a effective this year, after already taking your R22. Good news(?), the replacement, A2L is just somewhat flammable.
If you like your gas stove, you can keep your gas stove.
But not your gas.
Funny how Generac never mentions in their ads that the backup generator will have no fuel if the democrats claim the next (final) election.
I’ve already got a gas generator that I can run my whole house on, but even though I live in Michigan I’m looking at a solar backup just to run my well, sump, and the blower on my wood insert.
You know who else liked gas...
Le Pétomane?
Pepe le Pew?
Orin Scrivello, DDS
It's fine. In the future, all you'll need is a microwave installed in your pod to heat up your bugs.
No microwaves!
You will have to put the plate of bugs in the sunshine of you want them warmed up.
Sunshine? What if you have used up all your allotted sunshine minutes for the week?
Then you'll just have to eat raw food. Although it's going to be hard to track sunshine use. It's nearly everywhere.
Can I have a magnifying glass? I like a crispy exoskeleton.
Not the original flavor with 11 germs and viruses?
Next step is methane capture attached to everyone's assholes.
US spent 1.4B of taxpayer money for NGOs to help transport migrants to the southern border before illegally entering.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/washington-secrets/2829435/taxpayers-funding-immigrant-trips-north-envelopes-cash-whatever/
In funds provided by the State Department and U.S.-backed United Nations outlets, religious-based and other humanitarian groups are paving “migration trails” with cold cash and free “loans” to help ease the hardships immigrants face as they head to the border, like over 300,000 did in December.
According to an investigation by the Center for Immigration Studies, a Washington-based watchdog group, State handed out some $1.4 billion to international humanitarian groups in just the last year.
Every time I see clips of the "migrant" caravans, I see flashbacks to strafing attacks by Douglas A1 Skyraiders.
I am tired of hearing how illegal aliens entering our country is some kind of a victimless crime.
Someone has to feed them. Guess who: American Taxpayers
Someone has to clothe them. Guess who: American Taxpayers
Someone has to educate them. Guess who: American Taxpayers
Someone pays the ER bills. Guess who: American Taxpayers
Every penny we spend on illegal aliens is money we are not spending on our own children. Nobody asked if it was Ok with the American people. Our children are being victimized by illegal aliens.
I’m told that immigration is ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS net positive, with NEVER NEVER NEVER any downside. Thus, absolutely no limitations are controls on people stomping across a border should ever be necessary, let alone desirable!
You should eat from food trucks more often. It’ll make you feel better.
Especially Cuban sandwiches.
“Nobody asked if it was Ok with the American people.”
Actually, they have asked. And we’ve said no. This regime doesn’t care.
Our children are being victimized by illegal aliens.
I'd say our children are being victimized by the state. The illegal aliens are just taking advantage of an opportunity provided by the state like most of us probably would in their situation.
Fair.
There are victims, but we are being victimized by those who take our money and spend it on the things you mention. The immigrants are largely just responding to the incentives created by our supposed leaders.
Explains why there’s no investigation into who’s funding these hordes.
There’s nothing we could do differently!!!
Government should be banned from spending money.
Democrats are putting pressure on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to bring down interest rates.
Don't make them cheat to win this election.
A drop in interest rates will be the “October surprise “.
Before or after voting?
"Don’t make them cheat to win this election."
Good luck trying to stop them. They've already declared Biden the winner of the primary and done everything up to and including vote suppression, media embargoes of potential challengers, and threats of altering cast votes to make it happen. Even if they didn't have decades-old organized political machines already in place in a number of cities/states, the "lawfare" and politicization of DoJ are getting so brazen that even Biden himself might notice some of it happening at some point.
As the one true libertarian reminds us, Joe recognizes the constitution.
Joe Biden
@JoeBiden
I promised to ease student debt for millions of folks. The Supreme Court blocked me, but it didn’t stop me.
.
I found another way to help more than 3.7 million people—teachers, nurses, police officers, firefighters—with over $130 billion in relief.
The Supreme Court blocked me, but it didn’t stop me.
"How many divisions does the SCOTUS command?" - Joe "Il Douche" Biden
You know what other famous nanny state Democrat had a man crush on Mussolini?
Franklin Delano Roosevelt?
All of 'em?
Sounds a bit insurrection-y to me.
Biden "Give me the power!"
But...I thought Texas was ignoring the SCOTUS!!!
E.U. leaders agree to a $54 billion aid package for Ukraine.
Hopefully they have auditors.
BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Auditors! Good One!
I think the EU leaders should be able to give their money to whoever they want. But I didn't realize they were that independently wealthy!
Montana outlawed transgender surgery for minors. So to get around it they remove kids from parents with state power and ship them to Wyoming for transition.
https://nbcmontana.com/news/local/montana-governor-defends-removal-of-14-year-old-from-parents-who-opposed-gender-identity-greg-gianforte-krista-todd-kolstad-lgbt-transgender-social-transition-custody
Montana Child and Family Services (CFS) officials took custody of the 14-year-old from parents Krista and Todd Kolstad this month, according to Reduxx. The teenager is reportedly a biological female and recently began to express suicidal thoughts.
While being treated at a hospital in August, doctors began using the child's preferred name and pronouns, which do not correspond with the child's biological sex, according to Reduxx. The parents reportedly opposed and noted allowing their child to undergo any form of gender transition, socially or medically, was a violation of their "values, morals, and ... religious beliefs."
Doctors reportedly later moved the 14-year-old to a specialized residential treatment facility in Wyoming despite the parents preferring a facility in Billings, Montana. Krista and Todd claim they were given no information as to their child’s well-being or treatment during that time, according to Reduxx.
The governor says the law was followed? WTF.
It's important to keep in mind that Gianforte's a California migrant.
Cps. Child pedofile services
Kidnapping and crossing state lines with a minor.
No one involved in my daughter's kidnapping and subsequent mutilation would be allowed to live. Full stop, fuck you.
I was thinking that this seemed like rather personally dangerous behavior for the people involved.
This is legalized kidnapping. I've felt for quite some time now, especially based on Illinois's experience with its own Department of Child and Family Services (DCFS), that all of these "child protective" agencies need to be shut down.
Back when everyone was “defunding” the police, my son made the case that a lot of what they do could be done by social workers. I told him we already tried that. It's called DCFS. He was like oh right. Pretty much every parent has either had these people fuck with them or knows someone who has.
Pretty much every parent has either had these people fuck with them or knows someone who has.
Yep. I got a CPS visit over a salmonella diagnosis.
Nothing cures depression like getting your dick cut off.
The bills are wide-ranging. One would require advanced notice to be provided when grocery stores close in underserved communities.
The advanced notice is the police reports regarding shoplifting and assaults at businesses.
The grocery store by me closes at around 10:30pm. Why do black people need to be told that? It's on the sign.
Government controlling if private companies can close their own stores?
There’s a word for that, but I don’t want to hurt sarc’s feeling so I won’t use it.
Just don’t say they’re despicable people that are causing problems for the rest of society and it’ll be okay.
But you can call them dogs, as that isn't dehumanizing, according to Sarc and Chemjeff.
What possible purpose could that serve?
If they plan on stopping the store from closing, lol good luck, if they plan on getting another store to open there, also lol good luck. No amount of red tape or hoops are going to convince a store to stay there and operate at a loss while also threatening the people who work there with no-shit violence.
Massive chain stores don't just suddenly decide to close profitable stores, and they don't stay in business by operating unprofitable stores. No chain retailer is going to close a store because they are racists. Not a single one, anywhere in the United States.
Like Democrats, even racists are happy to profit off minorities they might not care for themselves. That's how they send their kids to places like Yale.
"What possible purpose could that serve?"
Making people more dependent on the government while looking like they are trying to fix the problem.
Do the stores ever just not tell anybody in advance?
Never seen a grocery store just clean out and have their doors locked the next morning after the closing the night before.
What police reports? You can't prosecute shoplifting under $10,000 so nobody is calling the cops.
Israel continues its controlled demolitions of neighborhoods in Gaza.
NIMBY's gone wild.
Urban renewal.
They should do what hamas did and take the water pipes from Gaza to us as rockets
If only they could eliminate zoning.
The normally tranquil mood of the Reason D.C. office was interrupted earlier this week by a shooting just down the block near Dupont Circle. Our crime photographer/managing editor Jason Russell captured the subsequent police activity.
The obvious solution to protect you guys is more restorative justice, ending cash bail, and not prosecuting violent crimes.
Like most cities, D.C. saw a big increase in violent crime during the pandemic. Unlike most cities, our violent crime rate is staying persistently high.
Wonder what these cities had in common....
"Jews" - Misek
Bears in trunks?
Obviously the bears got out already if crime is already increased.
Jew bears?
Panda?
We don’t take kindly to panda bears round ‘ere.
They just like the salmon, really. But they do look cute wearing the yarmulkes.
White supremacists – AOC
Don't encourage her rape fantasy.
Why not? It’s completely normal.
For just $8.5 million, you can buy the late Dianne Feinstein's home in D.C.
Does it come with free Chinese spies to help maintain the residence?
The CIA removed the CCP bugs when they were installing their's. They are nice guys like that.
You're implying the CCP had to resort to bugging Feinstein's house to get intel from her? I'm sure they could have just asked. Or used a Honeypot (whatever you do, don't mentally picture that).
https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/details-chinese-spy-dianne-feinstein-san-francisco/
I was pointing my ire at the CIA for having been caught spying on her office.
Still no arrest on that one yet.
Remmy ironic parody
https://reason.com/video/2014/03/20/remy-isnt-it-ironic/
Edit; didn't remember his parody vid - nice.
I don't think its ironic. I think the IC has gathered enough dirt on politicians across the spectrum to keep them insulated from reforms and to bend the politicians to their will. Another test of that hypothesis is coming up with the FISA 702 vote. We'll see how they all vote.
That’s great.
I don't think its ironic. I think the IC has gathered enough dirt on politicians across the spectrum to keep them insulated from reforms and to bend the politicians to their will. Another test of that hypothesis is coming up with the FISA 702 vote. We'll see how they all vote.
For just $8.5 million, you can buy the late Dianne Feinstein's home in D.C.
You simply need to spend a few years in the U.S. Senate (ideally on the MILCON subcommittee with a husband with defense contracts) to afford it.
A new report finds that government overreach led to "chaos" during the pandemic.
I'm beginning to wonder if the pandemic itself might have been government overreach.
“beginning”
Haha, your funniest one yet!
"A new report finds that government overreach led to “chaos” during the pandemic."
Was the study in the prestigious journal: "No Shit?" Monthly.
Police who killed an armed homeowner in a wrong door raid won't face criminal charges.
We don't want a chilling effect on police killing randos.
Lessons taken from this:
Never answer the door. Let *whoever* outside kick it in.
Fuck pistols, rifle rounds defeat Level IIIA
the D.C. Attorney General said, failing to read the room, that the city couldn't prosecute its way out of the crime wave.
At least he was wearing a mask.
Probably a bad poker player.
How else could he hide his smirk?
...the D.C. Attorney General said, failing to read the room, that the city couldn't prosecute its way out of the crime wave.
I didn't watch the video in the linked tweet, but I assume he was the stupid putz still wearing a fucking mask AFTER 4 FUCKING YEARS. No surprise that he would say something stupid.
Christ, what an asshole.
His mask protects you! Isn't that enough?!
I'd prefer he protect me and everyone else from his stupidity by shutting the fuck up and disappearing from public life forever, but that seems unlikely.
The best part is that criminals still mask up.
People who need to wear masks are those who are sick, or caring for those who cannot wear a mask.
CDC guidelines.
The mask is like The Scarlet Letter, or the Mark of Zorro....it marks the Uber-lib, or Progtard.
When they wear the mask inside the car while they are driving is the one that absolutely sends me into peals of laughter. I just cannot help myself. When they see me laughing at them, and they realize why, the eyes get HUGE. Priceless.
I think of masks like the sign in a Jeff Foxworthy comedy routine. "Here's your sign"
Earlier versions of this rule could have forced many gas stoves off the market entirely, complimenting local and state efforts to ban gas appliances in new development. The administration's final rule is more modest.
Oh well then, I'm sure that'll be the end of it. It's not like the government has a history of starting out small and then ratcheting up the regulations later, once their nose is under the proverbial tent. *rolls eyes*
require advanced notice to be provided when grocery stores close in underserved communities.
There already is advance notice. Have a soros da in a black area
E.U. leaders agree to a $54 billion aid package for Ukraine
The EU countries didn't want to send aid
The Biden administration's slow-burning war on gas stoves continues.
I just bought a new gas dryer last month, and a new gas fryer this month. So much better than electric.
The normally tranquil mood of the Reason D.C. office was interrupted earlier this week by a shooting just down the block near Dupont Circle.
Chicago: Welcome to the party, pal!
Tax policy compromise!
One part of the program lets me keep more of my own money, one part gives my money to other people. I guess that averages out.
The Kultur War (dur dur) is a class war.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/elite-1-percent-behind-cultural-civil-war
While it's nice to see data that corroborates it, this is something that most of us have known for quite some time anecdotally.
In fact, one must squint really hard not to see it.
"D.C. residents vented their frustrations at city officials yesterday at a community meeting, where the D.C. Attorney General said, failing to read the room, that the city couldn't prosecute its way out of the crime wave."
No, but they can sure decriminalize their way out. When nothing is illegal, then there is no crime, and no crime wave.
Are you ready for some noise!
https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_cca85f8c-c057-11ee-a13c-5bd4847f26a4.html
Who has locust swarms on their apocalypse bingo card?
They do this shit every year. No year has sounded any different than any other as far as I can tell.
This is the big one up here. Happens every 17 years if memory serves with smaller ones in between but this is an historic breed. Looking forward to seeing it with the grandkids. Gonna be epic.
Plenty to eat in Illinois this spring!
Gonna be a bunch of really happy birds. I drove a truck through the big east coast swarm of them in '21, and when I'd stop for the night at a truck stop, birds would perch on the grill and pick them out. All you can eat buffet!
Breaking News from February 1, 2041
Expect Nutrition Shortages Thanks to Over Harvesting of Cicadas Seventeen Years Ago: Experts Predict Increased Imports of Soylent Green from the People's Republic of Canada
The only thing that makes that unbelievable is the idea that we'll be importing our Soylent Green. I'm sure we'll have plenty of our own by then.
When was that Soylnet Green MAiD?
Destroying terror tunnels of Judeocidal terrorists in Gaza = Israel continues its controlled demolitions of neighborhoods in Gaza.
What dishonest dreck from the old grey hag.
"Compliment" and "complement" are completely different words. Please use the correct word in your writing.
TDS-addled shits with degrees urge SCOTUS to bar Trump from the ballot:
"Even Jefferson Davis recognized Section III ‘automatically disqualified him’: Dozens of historians urge Supreme Court to remove Trump from 2024 ballot"
https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/even-jefferson-davis-recognized-section-iii-automatically-disqualified-him-dozens-of-historians-urge-supreme-court-to-remove-trump-from-2024-ballot/
Even TDS-addled assholes like this should recognize Davis =/= Trump.
Essentially, all of the arguments that Trump incited tHe Insurrection®™ boil down to this.
Trump promoted Badthink®™, and because some people rioted on the basis of Badthink®™, that was an insurrection and Trump incited it.
Some may argue this applies to Patrice Cullors, Nikole Hannah-Jones, Charles M. Blow, and many others. After all, they chanted, “Hands Up, Don’t Shoot”. They claimed that the police habitually hunt down and gun down unarmed Black men. They claimed the criminal justice system is systemically racist. And some people rioted on this basis.
It would apply if this principle was enforced in an even-handed manner. But the same side that says that Trump was promoting Badthink®™ also believe that Cullors, Jones, and Blow were promoting Goodthink®™, and those who rioted based on this Goodthink®™ were not engaging in Insurrection®™, but fighting White Supremacy®™
“It would apply if this principle was enforced in an even-handed manner.”
Oh, so you support violence by Trump supporters?
— sarc
Well, if our society excuses rioting, then there is no choice.
HUNTER BIDEN FAKE SCANDAL UPDATE!
Comer: Hunter Biden associates ‘had a hard time remembering the bad things’
.
According to ABC News, he stated in opening remarks that he was not aware of any financial transactions or compensation that President Biden received related to business from any family members.
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/4440275-comer-hunter-biden-associates-hard-time-remembering-bad-things/
Key witness blows up fake scandal talking points.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Yet, ding dong, your article has this:
Nice try, Pluggo, but you still fail and flail.
turd certainly is dishonest, but he’s got a heaping helping of stupid to go with his dishonesty. Failing to read his own links is clear evidence of that stupidity.
Stupid, lying, despicable steaming pile of lefty shit and proud to be!
You don't expect him to read his own links, do you? I'm pretty sure the only ones he even looks at before posting are his CP links.
Schwerin told the committee that in his discussions with President Biden, who was vice president at the time, he was concerned about taking a transparent and ethical approach. He called the allegations led by the GOP “preposterous,”
They struck out with the family CPA!
Hilarious! You pig-ignorant fools will believe anything.
FAKE SCANDAL! DERP! BENGHAZI !!! TAN SUIT!
You are so desperate to defend Biden and his administration. Why?
I hate lying-ass politicians like Comer and Jim Jordan. They're campaigning by slandering a senile old fool who certainly did not run Chinese money-laundering organization.
Why aren't they doing something about the debt or the border? Because they are fucking useless (so is Joe Biden).
And then that jackass Tom Cotton went all Joe McCarthy on the CEO of TikTok USA yesterday - "ARE YOU A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNIST PARTY?" - twice.
What a slimeball.
So you go after them, but not a slimeball who has lied, cheated, and stolen since first being elected to the Senate in 1972?
Tell me you're a Democrat without coming out of the closet and telling me you're a Democrat.
Biden sucks but he is not making up lies about his political opponents every day.
Yes he is. Seen any speech where he says, well mumbles, MAGA.
How obtuse are you? He and his cohorts and minions lie about their opponents all the fucking time. It's been well documented in these very comment sections, idiot.
>>Biden sucks but he is not making up lies about his political opponents every day.
taking the comedy route today?
turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.
Man, you must hate Biden to...carry his jockstrap on every issue known to man.
Making herself at home! Adorable black footed cat called Gaia who's world's deadliest species is seen enjoying her new enclosure and chomping down on huge piece of meat at Utah zoo
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13031431/black-footed-cat-Gaia-deadliest-species-Utah-zoo.html
Before being introduced to the public several weeks ago, she underwent a quarantine period and full health check.
They sent the poor kitty to a concentration camp! Amazing it survived!
Is this your attempt to deflect from you defending Australian covid camps that even forced those who tested negative for covid into camps?
Sarc compares humans to animals.
But it’s not dehumanizing when he does it.
Lol. Good point.
So apparently Nikki Haley stepped in it recently when some media wag asked her about secession, giving a milquetoast boilerplate response about "states rights," blah blah blah.
Leaving aside the legalities of such a question for a moment, the center-right is turning itself into pretzels trying to argue what she SHOULD have said (funny how they indulge in the same "this is what she should have said" post hoc cope that Trump supporters get accused of all the time), instead of realizing that she's not mentally agile enough to make those arguments in the first place.
Now, legally speaking, can states secede of their own volition? No, they cannot. Texas vs. White established that legal framework for why states can't just up and break apart. But ultimately, secession, or any breakup of a national construct, is a political and military question, not a legal one. Congress won't do the smart thing and, for example, redraw the western states along their watersheds in order to make water management in the arid regions of the country an easier prospect, out of fear that it will reduce their own political authority.
But what if those areas decided to break away and reform along those lines? Would they have the "right" to do so? It's immaterial. They have the "right" to secede if the home country decides to 1) let them go, or 2) they win a war to maintain their independence. The Civil War hardly "settled" that question permanently. It settled it for that *time period.* But nations break down and redraw constantly. Even in the post-colonial era, where internationalists have manically tried to keep a permanent status quo on national borders, states have broken apart and reformed on a regular basis.
Do states have a right to secede from the US legally? No. But if they decide to break off and make it stick, that question is moot anyway. The question is more of a reflection of anxiety by the elites that their national construct isn't going to survive through the end of the decade, and come out looking very different by 2030 than what it was for the last 150 years. Because that's something they aren't confident they can actually control, and it terrifies them.
"When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation."
Saw a big discussion this week on if Texas nationals would still get Social Security - free healthcare after secession.
IOW - secession won't win any vote in Texas. Texans love their free healthcare and SS.
Would be hilarious seeing blue states freeze without access to Texas energy production.
And without fuel for vehicles, or power plants...
And without fuel for vehicles
Joke’s on you: by 2015, they’re going to be zipping around on high-speed rail!
"Saw a big discussion this week on if Texas nationals would still get Social Security – free healthcare after secession."
I'll bite. Where did you see this discussion?
The Court decided after the civil war that states do not have a right of secession. It was not settled law accepted by the Confederate states when they joined the union. In any case a SCOTUS ruling from the 19th century is irrelevant to what is a political issue.
I'm reading a book about the Partition of India right now. It was a giant clusterfuck. I'd like to think we could do better, but I'm not sure we could. The issue (as many have mentioned here before) is that it's not often one state against another, but urban versus rural.
Exactly. And even in the event if secession, there will be breakaway areas. States might vote to secede, but that doesn't mean it will be supported en masse. West Virginia broke off, and East Tennessee damn near did as well, and there were pockets in places like Mississippi that had no interest in supporting a CSA. During the revolution, there was fierce partisan fighting in the southern colonies, and Philadelphia was full of Tories.
“D.C. residents vented their frustrations at city officials yesterday at a community meeting . . . "
Should read "D.C. residents blamed themselves voting for so many democrats".
Oddly they never seem to actually make that connection.
>>The normally tranquil mood of the Reason D.C. office was interrupted earlier this week by
journalism? hey if there's a DC office why doesn't someone go outside and ask whether the VP-elect was at the DNC or on Capitol Hill at the time of the vote certification
>>Police who killed an armed homeowner in a wrong door raid won't face criminal charges.
New Mexico stepping up find the guy, find the crime.
>>California lawmakers are getting increasingly serious about reparations.
the armed skirmish will be known as the Ironic Wars
>>"It's a strong commonsense bipartisan step forward in providing tax relief for working families and small businesses."
how about you assholes cut taxes instead?
>>The Biden administration's slow-burning war on gas stoves continues.
bought gas powered backyard pizza oven out of spite.
have Steve Hackett tix and Black Crowes tix for same night bc mme. dillinger is adorably calendar deficient despite her otherwise enormous brain.
never seen Hackett & he's doing Foxtrot tunes bc 50-yr. anniversary.
seen Crowes 29x they're like family. which one to goto lol?
Whichever one the wife wants.
28 years together I'm pretty sure she's apathetic to all shows not TOOL or Howard Jones
Go to separate concerts and enjoy the show*
lol she's the type you want around.
“Police who killed an armed homeowner in a wrong door raid won’t face criminal charges.”
Ask yourself, “If the armed homeowner had killed the police in self-defense would he face criminal charges?” Never mind, it doesn’t matter anyway. The United States is no longer founded upon equal protection under the law. Its foundation is now protection of the strongest public sector unions in order to get re-elected. For every murdering cop who gets charged with the crimes they committed, dozens more never get charged; and for every murdering cop who gets convicted, dozens more go unpunished.
If you think the cop union is strong wait till you see the bs the teachers unions can pull
Shoot, they even orchestrated the takeover of a city's mayoral office.
And it's going so well for that city, too!
"What is a refundable tax credit? It's welfare by a different name. We're going to give cash payments, checks, to people who don't even pay taxes," said Rep. Thomas Massie
Someone give that guy a medal already.... And no. The Democrats in the Senate aren't going to stop this MORE stolen money bill unless it's to pout their not enough stolen $ stance.
My you politicians (short of Masssie) sure like to spend away my labors like nobodies business. F'You [Na]tional So[zi]alist[s].
"On Wednesday, the California Legislative Black Caucus released 14 bills intended to right the wrongs of past racist policies."
Seriously? This is a sentence on a libertarian website? A philosophy rooted in personal responsibility?
Liz is missing 🙁
Liz is in Berlin.