Study: If You Let People Buy Beer at Grocery Stores, the Liquor Stores Still Survive
Liquor store owners and store association lobbyists claimed that allowing alcohol sales on Sunday would negatively impact their livelihoods.

Repealing "blue laws" and allowing Sunday alcohol sales has much less of a negative effect than doomsayers predicted.
That's according to a new research paper by Cristina Connolly and Alyssa McDonnell of the University of Connecticut, Marcello Graziano of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, and Sandro Steinbach of North Dakota State University. The study, published in the Journal of Wine Economics by Cambridge University Press, "examine[d] the impact of repealing Sunday blue laws on alcohol sales and retail competition, focusing on Connecticut's 2012 policy change allowing Sunday beer sales in grocery stores."
Connecticut repealed its long-standing prohibition on Sunday alcohol sales in 2012—more than a century after the law was introduced and three decades after the Connecticut Supreme Court deemed most of the state's other Sunday sales prohibitions unconstitutional. Liquor stores would also be allowed to open on Sundays, in addition to letting grocery stores sell beer on that day.
The repeal of blue laws is not without its critics. According to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's MIT Tech Talk newspaper, a 2008 study found that "repealing America's blue laws not only decreased church attendance, donations and spending, but it also led to a rise in alcohol and drug use among people who had been religious."
Connecticut's repeal was opposed at the time by liquor store owners themselves, who expressed concern about everything from the "social costs" of more alcohol sales to the extra expense incurred from being open an extra day.
"Proprietors of liquor stores in Connecticut and store association lobbyists claimed that allowing Sunday sales would negatively impact their livelihoods," write the authors of the new study. "Not only would they need to pay operating costs for an extra day of the week, but there was also a concern that consumers would shift to purchasing beer at grocery stores as Sunday is one of the most popular grocery shopping days. Specifically, Connecticut's liquor store association claimed that, as a direct result of this policy, liquor stores would lose sales and reduce employment, or close."
The authors examined Connecticut's sales figures for grocery and liquor stores both before and after the repeal, using other states without Sunday alcohol laws as a control group. They found "no evidence of negative impacts on beer sales in liquor stores."
"Despite repeated claims by liquor store associations," the report concludes, "repealing these laws did not harm liquor stores, suggesting that it is possible to repeal Sunday blue laws without negatively impacting smaller businesses." Incidentally, the study also contradicted claims by grocery store lobbyists, who said Sunday alcohol sales would "have large, positive economic impacts."
The same data also provides comfort for those who worry that being able to buy alcohol one additional day per week would lead to an explosion in alcoholism and addiction. "Our estimates indicate that repealing these laws significantly increased beer sales at grocery and liquor stores directly after the policy shift, but these effects disappeared afterward."
"There is an initial bump in sales, possibly due to the novelty of the policy," they found. "This impact levels off after the initial month, with no discernible effect on sales after the seventh week."
As it turns out, the repeal benefited both consumers and vendors while proving the doomsayers wrong. But it was also a net positive for economic liberty as another piece of Prohibition falls by the wayside.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This could also be called: Visiting Missouri
All of our grocery stores have full liquor departments. Beer, wine, spirits, you name it. Have forever.
All of our liquor stores have stuff in them that's not liquor. Batteries, cigarettes, bottle openers, snacks, etc.
Michigan is mostly the same. The county I was born in was a "no Sunday sales" county until maybe 20 years ago, so my parents would just stop the next county over while we were out cruising the area farms, "shinin' for deer".
Same here in Phoenix, but our liquor stores also have glass bubble pipes (for smoking meth) and a small amount of paraphernalia for weed. I'd be surprised if they don't also stock aluminum foil for pill smokers--
Study: If You Let People Buy Beer at Grocery Stores, the Liquor Stores Still Survive
In North Carolina, this happens because the liquor stores (i.e. ABC Stores) are State-tun like in old Soviet Union.
If liquor sales were in private stores, especially in the same stores as beer and wine, it really wouldn’t make a difference in sales. After all, the George Thorogood song is: “One Bourbon, One Scotch, One Beer.”
🙂
😉
"repealing America's blue laws not only decreased church attendance, donations and spending, but it also led to a rise in alcohol and drug use among people who had been religious."
Sounds like a win.
Win or not, my response to that passage was "so fucking what?" It's not the state's job to make sure liquor stores stay in business. Whether there are "negative impacts" to repealing blue laws or not, whether it affects churches or not, whether it was an economic boon or bust, blue laws should kindly fuck off.
The state declared liquor stores "essential" in 2020-2022. Looks like states want liquor protected.
To be fair, I might not have survived 2020 without liquor.
It's the tax revenue. Same reason many states decided lottery sales were 'essential' but many household consumer goods were not.
aye
We need to figure out how to bottle this viewpoint and force lawmakers to drink it...Every time someone says, "There should be a law..." a fight would break out and no frivolous new law would be passed. In a perfect world. I'm also kind of shocked there's a "Journal of Wine Economics" that publishes "scholarly" articles. I'm pretty surprised something like that can survive economically. It just reinforces the idea that government grants are just Welfare for PhD's, because without it, I have my doubts about the survival of the Journal of Wine Economics.
I think they're getting cause and effect mixed up.
Declining church attendance made it politically popular to repeal blue laws. It's not like people went to church because some stores were closed.
The repeal of blue laws is not without its critics. According to the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's MIT Tech Talk newspaper, a 2008 study found that "repealing America's blue laws not only decreased church attendance, donations and spending, but it also led to a rise in alcohol and drug use among people who had been religious."
As if 9/11, molester priests, televangelist con artists, and just having a life of yioir own wasn't reason enough to desert religion.
🙂
😉
Um, you don't even need a study for that. Just visit a state that isn't a liquor control state, like Illinois (yes, they actually got that one right). Here, grocery stores sell beer, wine, and liquor, and coexist with liquor stores, sometimes right next door to each other. You'll find, for example, Jewel-Osco (grocer) selling beer/wine/liquor right next door to a Binny's (liquor store) selling the same (and specializing in it). The only real difference is that the liquor stores tend to specialize in things not found at grocers.
NH taxes alcohol a lot less than ME, but hasn’t legalized recreational weed. So at many border crossings there’s a bunch of pot shops on the ME side and liquor stores on the NH side.
edit: Used to be a lot of fireworks stores on the NH side until ME legalized them.
Fireworks stands are the first thing that Iowans notice when driving south into Missouri.
Every summer when I cross the Illinois-Wisconsin border at Beloit, I notice two things: Heading north: TONS of gas stations just on the Wisconsin side of the border. The gas is typically 50 cents to a dollar cheaper per gallon. Heading south into Illinois: lots and lots of marijuana dispensaries.
Call me strange but I really don't get worked up about the price of gas. I burn ten to twenty gallons a week. A fifty cent change would equal five to ten dollars. A week. Doesn't freak me out much.
At 10 gallons, that’s a difference of $5, but since the price of gas is about $3-$3.50 per gallon, that’s like a free gallon and more when you buy in Indiana or Wisconsin.
Which in the grand scheme of things is what exactly? Not much. Would you go through all that effort for a slice of pizza? Probably not, though you'd get more enjoyment.
If one is driving, and the border is right there, with two exits mere miles apart at most, you take the lower priced of the two. Those $5s add up.
How much gas to get to the border?
Depends, did you start in Rockford? Not much.
I mean, OK, but $10 per week is $500+ annually.
I typically spend about $50/week on gas. Last summer it was $4.50 in Illinois and $3.60 in Wisconsin. That's about 20% - 25% off. It adds up quick.
So does a cup of coffee a day. And that’s what it amounts to. Getting mad about the monetary equivalent of a cup of joe.
I doubt anyone went broke by buying a cup of coffee every day.
Which is why I don’t get worked up over the price of gas.
I can't remember when gas was less than a buck.
But I can remember it being less than two bucks. Now it's three and change. At the same time a Big Mac Meal was three bucks, now it's seven or eight. Perspective.
1997-2001. When I lived in Kansas, during college, at one point it hit a low of $0.67 / gallon. I drove to Chicago and back in my little Honda Civic for something like $15.
How much was a meal at a fast food restaurant?
Maybe $4?
I remember the mid-1960s when intersections of mid-size roads in Detroit would have a gas station on each corner competing to offer 19 cent per gallon gas. And the workers would check your fluids and wash your windows while your car was being filled.
The only snow day I had in high school wasn't because of the three feet of snow. Problem was diesel in the school busses turned to jello.
“I burn ten to twenty gallons a week”
You mean in your industrial barrel, in the alley where you sleep? And the price of gas doesn’t matter when you’re siphoning it off in the dead of night, like you do. The rest of us pay money for our gas. Which we purchase at filling stations.
Likewise at the Illinois/Indiana border. Weed shops and liquor stores to the west in Calumet City; gas stations, grocers, fireworks shops, etc., to the east in Hammond and Munster.
Same with the weed stores on the Idaho/Washington border.
Yep. Idaho is still pretty assholish about marijuana possession though. Although I’ve noticed they’re more lax about it during tourist season in downtown Couer d’Alene.
In nanny states like Minnesota and California, people drive to South Dakota or Arizona/Nevada to get the good fireworks.
It's because we have idiots in California who are liable to burn the entire neighborhood down. You know those major raging wildfires we get here? A not insubstantial number started by idiots with fireworks.
Doomsayers were right here in Colorado. Liquor store sales are down 5-10% since beer/wine started being sold in groceries and chains. Most of them here were mom-n-pop stores because the law previously limited the number of liquor licenses one owner could have.
Likewise, local craft brewers and distillers are consolidating and closing because those mom-n-pop stores were precisely the folks who stocked their inventory with small new brews. Now, the purchasing agents for chains are out-of-state and require much bigger volume.
Which is perfect for the Reason ideology. Kill the small because the big donor class is more efficient. Colorado was the best place for craft brewers to do well.
Liquor store sales are down 5-10% since beer/wine started being sold in groceries and chains. Most of them here were mom-n-pop stores because the law previously limited the number of liquor licenses one owner could have.
People, being allowed to do all their shopping at the same place, are doing all their shopping at the same place.
Wonderful for consumers who aren’t much interested in the serendipity of having choices. Not so good for people who want to start a business or have career options beyond working in a grocery store. It's like all the wonderful things that Amazon does to your town.
I really do despise donor class economics.
It’s like all the wonderful things that Amazon does to your town.
I used to say the same thing about Walmart. Until I realized that competition is a bitch, and the consumer is the winner. I'm the consumer. So are you.
It's not competition when the playing field is tilted towards the big and the well-connected. Libertarians - and Reason in particular - completely suck at identifying thumbs on the scale. Especially when those thumbs have expensive rings on them and are waving cash around.
That would include decisions that become more centralized and national (or even global) so that lobbyists can jurisdiction-shop, financing that is driven more by the ability to acquire subsidized debt from Wall St rather than financing out of profits, etc.
I used to think this was just a failure to see. It's not.
Oh - and the notion that people are ONLY consumers is one of the worst parts of donor economics. Because separating production from consumption is precisely what sticks debt as the central measure of economic growth going forward. It is the worst thing that happened to economics moving from the classical era to the neoclassical/marginalist era.
Soooo...Where do bent-and-dent stores fit into this?
They are typically locally-owned Mom-and-Pop stores, yet they get their inventory from the surplus and salvage of the mega-big-box stores and manufacturers.
Also, small businesses also get their capital to provide services and maintain their businesses from Walmart and other big-box stores. Where do they figure in this?
Needless to say, bent-and-dent and surpluts-and-salvage and other small businesses also love "donor class economics."
Liquor stores sell Bud too. Bud can get shelf space anywhere it wants. Smaller producers can't. The really small/new producers can't get any.
Or liquor sales are down since pot was legalized.
Pot was legalized over a decade ago. The liquor store sales drop started in March 2023 - which happens - coincidentally I'm sure - to be the same month Prop 125 took effect. A proposition that was paid for by Target (MN); Albertsons/Safeway (ID/CA); Kroger (OH); and Instacart (CA)
How is this constitutional under the First Amendment? Wouldn’t the days of week have to rotate each year to meet the “freedom from religion” clause of the First Amendment.
Sunday is based on some interpretations of some religions.
Maybe next year close on Mondays. The next year close on Tuesdays, etc.
The US Supreme Court ruled that since so many people want Sunday off, regardless of the reason, it's constitutionally permissible to have laws reflecting that. Otherwise you could say having government business operate by a 7-day calendar at all, regardless of what's done on what day, being religion-derived, is impermissible, since another religion might have a week of different length.
In California you can buy hard liquor at grocery stores too.
And California has more liquor stores than anywhere else.
They need it.
Beat me to it.
Liquor licenses shouldn't exist.
States shouldn't operate liquor stores.
Very true.
How is it up to the government to protect businesses from competition? I see this in New Mexico, as dispensaries open up all over the state. I can't count how many times I've heard that "they" shouldn't allow so many to open, since undoubtedly some of them will not be successful. How is it up to government to decide who succeeds and who doesn't?
The worst part of a nation turning to socialism is the notion that Gov-Guns will save my crumbling enterprise under socialism. It's a self-sustaining rut of destruction. The only thing that defeats [Na]tional So[zi]al[ism] is Liberty and Justice for all.
Just excite the socialists and take their assets to be fed tributes as reparations, for all the capitalists they’ve harmed.
In related news, the state of Oregon didn't release a study it funded, when the study found that higher beer and wine taxes would not stop people from drinking.
(There goes the argument for raising taxes as a social deterrent)
Nevada, California, and Louisiana all permit liquor sales in grocery and drug stores. There is no shortage of liquor stores. And I never noticed a surplus of alcoholics in any of them.
There is a surplus of homeless, and I suppose quite a bit of them are that way due to alcoholism.
I don’t think that now there is a problem for buyers to find a store with a profitable and necessary set of goods and delivery to their home. For example, here in shop women's rings you can find stunning jewelry for women for any occasion. One of the hallmark features of German Kabirski jewelry is its commitment to breaking free from traditional norms. Each piece is a work of art that challenges conventional notions of beauty and style. The designs are often avant-garde, pushing boundaries and redefining what is considered standard in the jewelry industry.
Here in Commifornia, grocery stores can sell liquor, from beer to the hard stuff. Plus poofy seltzers.
Has it meant the demise of liquor stores? Hah! In my neighborhood there is a liquor store in proximity to each major grocery store. Sometimes so close they share a wall. I'm not in a food desert and we have a lot of large and small grocery stores, but of the five non-ethnic grocers in a three mile radius, every one has a liquor store within two blocks. And this holds up in my home town out in rural red county.
The exception is the Sprouts, the poofy organic grocer that also sells homeopathic bullshit instead of a pharmacy section. But about three blocks away is a BevMo, basically a big box liquor store.
Okay, the downside. For the most part, liquor stores tend towards the low end of beverage quality. Bud, Coors, Ripple, etc. Heck, the only place you CAN find "fortified" wines is in a liquor store. Not even BevMo will carry that shit (but it does carry a very nice selection of Ports and Madeiras).