Tax Us, Daddy?
Plus: Polycules go mainstream, DeSantis pulls out, tackle football lives on, and more...

Taxes are the only way to get rid of excess money? "We ask you to tax us, the very richest in society," reads an open letter to the world leaders assembled in Davos, Switzerland, penned by 250 millionaires and billionaires who seem to be gluttons for punishment.
"We'd be proud to pay more," declares their website, which is thusly named. "This will not fundamentally alter our standard of living, nor deprive our children, nor harm our nations' economic growth. But it will turn extreme and unproductive private wealth into an investment for our common democratic future." Signatories include Disney and Rockefeller heiresses, as well as actor Brian Cox.
Currently, nobody is forcing them to keep their earnings. They have full freedom to do whatever they'd like with their money—including giving it away to charity or coordinating with other similarly rich people to pool money together to tackle specific issues that might be too large for just one billionaire to handle.
"Inequality has reached a tipping point, and its cost to our economic, societal and ecological stability risk is severe—and growing every day," reads the letter, which in no way substantiates how "inequality" has reached this "tipping point" or what exactly happens if inequality continues to grow. (Absolute wealth is infrequently mentioned in these types of calls to action. It's always relative wealth, which allows signatories to ignore the vast standard-of-living gains that have been made over the last century.)
"If our elected officials refuse to address this concentration of money and power, the consequences will be dire," warned Cox.
Speaking of concentrations of power: The impetus for the open letter is the World Economic Forum's meeting in Davos, which is happening now and drawing leaders from across the globe—frequently arriving on their private jets. ("Private jet emissions quadrupled during Davos 2022," reads a Guardian headline from last year, which put the total number of private jet flights at 1,040. Fascinating that those who are so concerned with climate change still feel comfortable flying private.)
The bright spot, amid the calls for coercive wealth redistribution, was undoubtedly the speech given by newly elected Argentine President Javier Milei, who is so full of fiery takes that he might just singe your eyebrows off.
"Today I am here to tell you that the Western world is in danger, and it's in danger because those who are supposed to defend the values of the West are co-opted by a vision of the world that inexorably leads to socialism, and thereby to poverty," said Milei. "Unfortunately, in recent decades, motivated by some well-meaning individuals willing to help others, and others motivated by the desire to belong to a privileged class, the main leaders of the Western world have abandoned the model of freedom for different versions of what we call collectivism."
But Argentina knows firsthand, he warned, just how bad of an economic situation can arise from state intervention: "We are here to tell you that collectivist experiments are never the solution to the problems that afflict the citizens of the world, rather they are the root cause."
"Today's states don't need to directly control the means of production to control every aspect of the life of individuals," he continued. "With tools like printing money, debt, subsidies, control of the interest rate, price controls, and regulations to correct the so-called market failures, they can control the lives and fates of millions of individuals."
And, later on: "They say that capitalism is evil because it's individualistic and that collectivism is good because it's altruistic, of course with the money of others."
You couldn't engineer a better response to the taxation-hungry billionaires mentioned above if you tried. People are always free to give their own money away, but it takes a special breed to favor coercion.
"Do not be intimidated either by the political caste nor by parasites who live off the state. Do not surrender yourself to a political class that only wants to perpetuate itself in power and keep their privileges," Milei added, closing with a forceful defense of value creators: "You [entrepreneurs] are social benefactors, you are heroes, you are the creators of the most extraordinary period of prosperity we have ever seen. Let no one tell you that your ambition is immoral."
After all, "the state is not the solution, the state is the problem itself."
It's about time someone went into the lion's den and forcefully defended free market capitalism.
Oh, and Milei? He flew commercial, saving taxpayers an estimated $392,000.
Milei viajando a Davos en avión comercial, como cualquier normal. Los argentinos no tienen idea de los millones de dólares de impuestos que nos ahorró el presidente con su austeridad. pic.twitter.com/l2NTeO1fhX
— Pregonero (@PregoneroL) January 15, 2024
Scenes from New York: Can someone please check in on the NYC media class? They're obsessed with polyamory right now, and the rest of us are bored. (It's good that people have more sexual freedom now than ever before. It's bad that I have to hear about it.)
The new issue of @NYMag explores the world of ethical non-monogamy. The package includes a feature by @AllisonPDavis on one specific polycule, and offers poly-curious readers an in-depth guide to opening up their relationships. Read about the issue: https://t.co/Gf188nm2sV pic.twitter.com/Oi6oyvKbmg
— New York Magazine Communications (@nymagPR) January 16, 2024
QUICK HITS
- "I'm worried that authorities don't feel compelled to provide citizens with towns and cities that work, and feel safe, and offer slivers of shade and corners that don't smell of piss," wrote Chris Arnade for Unherd. "But I'm also worried about the cultural forces that have got us here: that they allow the tolerably well-off to ignore the plight of those who are forced to depend on public services. The regulatory mindset is a problem that can be easily changed; the more pernicious part is that we are now firmly a low-trust society, and social trust impacts everything—every facet of life—and it can't simply be legislated back."
- "There is nothing more unjust than social justice," says Milei:
"There is nothing more unjust than social justice.
Because what is the greatest achievement of liberalism? Liberalism's greatest achievement is 'equality before the law.' When you adhere to the ideas of social justice … what you are really doing is using the repressive state… https://t.co/gbzwSbwsuQ
— Liz Wolfe (@LizWolfeReason) January 18, 2024
- The U.S. launched even more strikes against Iran-backed Yemeni Houthis (which the Biden administration redesignated as a terrorist organization yesterday).
- The World Health Organization just released guidance stating that the evidence supporting "gender-affirming care" for children is actually "limited and variable." National Review has more.
- Yes, AI is a labor-replacing tool, what of it?
- California legislators finally realized that banning tackle football for kids and teenagers was an insane idea all along.
- Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis has pulled out of campaigning in New Hampshire and is concentrating his resources—to the extent that they exist—on South Carolina.
- Disturbing:
4.1 percent of all deaths were medically assisted in Canada in 2022. 13,241 Canadians were euthanized -- a growth rate of 31.2% over 2021. pic.twitter.com/vneUmmBYQe
— Wesley Yang (@wesyang) January 17, 2024
- Death to intersectionality:
The left loves to be like "it's all connected! Climate change, racism, Palestine, capitalism! It's all one issue!" And while I fundamentally disagree with that outlook, if you insist on framing it that way, then fine. I guess you've lost me on everything.
— Ben Dreyfuss (@bendreyfuss) January 18, 2024
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Can someone please check in on the NYC media class? They're obsessed with polyamory right now...
That's supplanted trans as the current thing?
Destruction of the nuclear family under a different name. So, no, it's still the current thing.
Nuclear families? Is that like Mr. Burns?
All the better to glow in the dark.
No, in that instance it's a nuke-ular family.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nth4RqqmQZ4
I was saying "Boo-urns"
It's not a destruction. Think of it as a build-on and remodel.
🙂
😉
Sometimes you have to cut off some testicles to make a vagina, right?
I'm talking about Polyamory, not Transgenderism, though, yeah that is involved in the latter.
Just building the case for the eventual trans polyamory relationship article.
*** Spoiler***
Your a transphobe if you aren't in one.
And apparently, your cat is going to join too.
I'm wondering (as a cat owner) what photoshop they used as there is no way cats will sit still long enough for a camera much less pose like that.
We already have enough uphill battles as cat owners.
Wanna lick my pussy?
Be careful, them pussies got claws and teeth.
Even still, just grab 'em.
There was a movie about that. Was called Teeth.
There is no slippery slope, but somehow we are sliding towards this milestone in any case.
Nope, no slope. For these fucktards, it's complete free fall.
It's only slippery if the spice (plural of "spouse") get into oil wrestling.
🙂
😉
In every single human society ever polyamory always ends up as one rich, powerful guy with a harem. The clerisy always imagines human nature somehow doesn't apply to them.
The rest of the guys will have to embrace foreign wars, the clergy, or serving in the new Trans Story Hour Corps.
Yep. It's one of the reasons Islamic civilization is so fucked up. A few guys at the top get a harem while you have a bunch of young men not married off to make families. Instead, they're sexually frustrated and take it out on everyone else. A recipe for civil unrest.
In every single human society ever polyamory always ends up as one rich, powerful guy with a harem.
And yet it keeps reappearing.
Why?
Because the guys staring at the harem with envy and lust don't just want one woman IN the harem. They want the harem too.
Because THAT'S human nature.
Women want a powerful male that can care for their offspring. Men want females. Lots of females. To carry THEIR offspring.
Humans do not naturally pair bond.
Evolutionary psychologists believe the standard setup for H. erectus, habilis and all the other human species was one male with up to six females.
Nice.
Not for all the young males who were excluded or wound up on the wrong end of a spear.
It does explain the size disparity between the sexes though.
That was the case with past Polyamory. With AI sexbots made in any configuration, iPolyamory could be within anyone’s reach one day,
And men of the Middle East could enjoy too if they rose up and forced their present masters to de-nstionslize the oil industries and diversify their economies, and the latter would be something that would come much easier if non-Muslim Kuffirs could be equal citizens in their societies.
But that's pretty much exclusively polygamy, no?
I don't think polyamory will ever work out well for a lot of people, but if some people can make it work and be happy, I say good for them. I don't think it will ever become a very common thing in any society where people are more or less free to engage in the relationships they choose. Humans are a very monogamous species.
It's like communism, sounds good on paper but never works out in practice due to human nature.
Men are biologically programmed to compete with each other for mates (e.g. they don't share well). Whereas women are biologically programmed to compete with each other for the strongest bond to a single mate (so they don't share well either).
There's tons of research on how male and female brain patterns are different when it comes to sexual desire that supports this (while, incidentally, completely undermining the entire trans argument as - surprise, surprise - transwomen, gay men, and straight men all have the same brain patterns, just different triggers)
I agree in general. It's dumb to act like it's an option that everyone should consider. But if some small set of outliers with unusual personalities want to do something different, good for them.
"But that’s pretty much exclusively polygamy, no?"
Yes, polyamory always ends up as polygyny. No exceptions.
Polyamory and orgies and the like sound sexy and glamorous when you are, maybe, a teen or young person with little life experience.
Once you actually meet someone who partakes in this kind of stuff, well, you become very quickly disillusioned.
In fact, the picture of the lady on the polyamory article is maybe on the better looking end of some of the people ive seen that partake in this stuff, and...woof
"Woof!" Is also an interjection of hawtness in some Gay circles. And has anyone heard of CeraVe and other anti-aging treatments? Aging does not have to mean decline in sexiness.
Ugly people like to get laid too. Often with other ugly people.
The political class is always behind. Libertarians were obsessed with polyamory like 5-10 years ago.
Try 30+ years in my case, when I first heard of it in Jim Stumm’s Living Free Libertarian ‘zine… Though thanks to Statist economics, I am more preoccupied with struggling for one. Maybe someday...
Not necessarily. They could join in too as long as they don't hog the wardrobe or the bathroom.
🙂
😉
(It's good that people have more sexual freedom now than ever before. It's bad that I have to hear about it.)
No one has to partake, Liz. In facts, Polys could be good neighbors and lend you bottomless cups of sugar from their compiled earnings. Also, they would be more likely to have their homes paid off, so you wouldn't need to be as concerned over whose moving in next unless they sold.
New documents obtained by the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government reveal that the federal government flagged terms like "MAGA" and "TRUMP" for financial institutions if Americans used those phrases when completing transactions. Individuals who shopped at stores like Cabela's or Dick's Sporting Goods, or purchased religious texts like a bible, may also have had their transactions flagged.
https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/federal-government-flagged-transactions-using-terms-maga-and-trump-financial#:~:text="The%20Committee%20and%20Select%20Subcommittee,suggested%20search%20terms%20and%20Merchant
There is no deep state. There is no weaponization of government. Don't be a conspiracy theorist.
We're also not supposed to notice the stories about the military and bureaucrats are ALREADY planning on how to defy Trump if he wins.
Numerous court martials of high ranking dolts for insubordination or treason seems to be a necessary step.
Not an insurrection due to reasons. Sure they are using their government powers to undermine an elected official, but did they knock over a fence??
I'll note the lack of red hats and, apparently, that is required for insurrection. From the little known "Red Headwear" clause of the insurrection laws clause.
I wonder what kind of lists you get on with monthly purchases from LuckyGunner and SGA?
There is no deep state.
Not a deep state at all, moron.
It is called criminal profiling. Repubs used to call it Stop and Frisk.
Profiling people for entirely legal purchases that are obviously socio-political is called 'fascism'.
This is why you guys are Nazis.
Technically, fascism is the economic scheme, but political profiling is a favored tool.
No it isn't. Fascism is a political ideology which favors an ethnic/national/religious/racial group.
Amazing watching morons repeat narratives written by leftist wiki editors instead of actual primary sources written by the actual fascists.
"Fascism is a political ideology which favors an ethnic/national/religious/racial group."
That's Nazism, which also applies to you guys in spades. Fascism is mostly economic and political theory, specifically corporatist socialism and authoritarianism.
No no, fascism exists on the right. (Completly ignore that collectivism of any type is to the left of individualism.)
It is why we call you police state lovers "fascists".
Remember your hero Donnie loves Asset Theft and roughing up suspects.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Just come out of the closet already, and proudly wear your brown shirt and arm band in public.
You mean Red Hat in the USA.
I just ordered a red hat that says Cult Leader on it.
How much does the asshole turd lie? Well:
Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2
April.20.2021 at 10:47 pm
“Ashli Babbitt attacked the USA much like the 9/11 hijackers did.”
Only the hottest of hot takes from the pedo.
Remained in full retard mode i see.
Does Pluggo ever leave full retard mode?
Sometimes he starts at 25% retard.
Well, it is morning so he probably has to warm up to being 100% full retard after falling out of bed.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
Many people have repeatedly told you exactly what they mean by the deep state and pointed to where it actually exists.
Shopping at sporting goods stores isn’t criminal. You’re an evil cunt.
It also included Bass Pro Shops, Cabelas, and Dicks Sporting Goods. That would have included millions of people that never even considered going to DC. Last time I was at Dick's it didn't seem too insurrectiony.
Pickle ball leads to war.
Do they sell rainbow T-shirts and gender fluid trans sport pads or not?
Do they even sell guns or ammo any more? Wouldn't know, I quit going to them years ago.
I think I recall they stopped selling guns several years ago.
No, they don't. Because virtue signalling.
This has always been my position. The Government does enough bad stuff right in front of our eyes, it really doesn't matter what, if anything, they are doing behind our backs.
Mexico to bulldoze border camps and set up road check points to help Biden with election year messaging about the border.
https://scnr.com/article/mexico-has-cut-migrant-flow-to-u-s-to-help-biden-in-the-2024-election_9640171fb54c11ee9c930242ac1c0002
I wonder what that cost us.
10%, probably.
Been thinking about this.
According to some googling: "The U.S. has given Mexico $234.79 million in assistance over the past five years, or roughly $46.9 million per year. The U.S. plans to provide Mexico with $134.6 million in the current budget year."
It seems like we could say to Mexico "Here's $2B. We're going to put this over here, and for every illegal alien we catch on our side of the border, we're going to deduct $2500. And for every kilo of drugs we interdict on our side of the border, we're deducting $2500. At then end of the year, you can keep the rest, free and clear."
The majority of drugs smuggled into the US are brought in by American citizens at official crossing points.
That would be a more logical way to handle the problem. Not sure it would work, but it makes sense to me.
I believe in open borders, that's why I am a Libertarian, but isn't this kind of deal exactly what authoritarians expect of a closed border politician like Biden?
Open Borders into a welfare state is not a libertarian position, see libertarian thinkers like Hoppe.
The fact is they are doing it just to try to help Biden so he can go back to open border into said welfare state.
...those who are forced to depend on public services.
Forced. That seems to be a large group.
Well, maybe your state isn't doing it right.
Use the cops, and the National Guard if necessary, to round up all the homeless every day and deliver them to the welfare offices. If they say they don't want the services, bus them to NYC.
Be fair. In a proper totalitarian system, everything people do is "forced".
Scenes from New York: Can someone please check in on the NYC media class? They're obsessed with polyamory right now, and the rest of us are bored. (It's good that people have more sexual freedom now than ever before. It's bad that I have to hear about it.)
It is only a culture war when you respond to it.
It is only a culture war when you
respond topounce on it.FTFY
I thought it was a "seize" week.
False! If only one side in the war is actively engaged in military assault then it will be a very SHORT war, but it will still be a war. In a culture war the other side can hold off for a generation or two before the assailant finally runs out of social justice laws to implement, if ever ...
""We'd be proud to pay more,"
Pretty sure you're more than free to pay more. Perhaps don't hire your accountants to maximize your tax write offs and the like.
Governments will accept payments above your tax requirement. That is only the MINIMUM you must pay.
It is a false argument anyways. If you confiscated all their wealth it wouldn't even offset a year if spending. It is pure virtue signaling as shown by their voluntary inaction. Their claims are propaganda to raise all taxes and to allow for stronger government control.
Hell, if they took all of the money of the richest folks here...it would not pay a single interest payment on our debt.
It’s worse than virtue signaling since these little Mao’s are anxious to force their views on everyone else. Authoritarians all.
Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, et al were at least up front about running and ruining other's lives; these assholes just prevaricate about it [but want to ruin you no less than their predecessors]. Much better if they can cajole us into compliance.
Look, some of these numbnuts can only achieve orgasm through totalitarian fantasies. You wouldn't want to deny them, would you?
Not only totalitarian fantasies. Also children.
Perhaps don’t hire your accountants to maximize your tax write offs and the like.
Exactly. Every single year that Warren Buffet comes out with his "my secretary pays more taxes than I do" routine.
(referring to my comment above)
SPLOOGE!
And then Warren has his secretary clean him up.
It is a strange thing that they won't get rid of their "excess wealth" unless compelled to do it. In other words, this is not about doing what they think is proper on their own, it is about forcing all those who disagree with their statement to do so as well, whether those people think they have wealth in excess or not. It it is nasty, passive-aggressive, hypocritical nonsense.
^THIS^ +10000000000.
If they were serious about this, they’d do some research into effective, efficient charities that are about helping people, rather than supporting some progressive agenda, and drop their spare millions on them. They’d surely get better results than the same amount of money given to the government.
They're committed to saving democracy from Trump in the short term and it won't be cheap fortify the election. After that they'll be working closely with president Newsome to make sure the right grifters get paid.
That's how the Robber Baron's did it. They spent their early years amassing great fortunes. When they got old and seeing death coming on they poured their money into building schools, libraries, museums and other cultural institutions.
The current class wants to massacre humanity
BTW Warren Buffett is making sure none of his money goes to the government, Bill Gates too.
They know damn well how to pay more. They don’t want to pay more, they want you to pay more.
It's more than just virtue signaling. It's actually FALSE. They would make the further statement (if anyone ever called them on that) that it would be unfair for them to pay more while other wealthy people refused to pay more. What they really mean when they dribble crap like that is they would be proud to pay more as long as everyone is FORCED to pay more. FORCE is what makes it "fair" in that context, and ONLY force ...
Yep. It seems as though they know that calling for higher taxes on other people is not received well, so they put it out there as calling for higher taxes on themselves. If they believe that they have assets that are 'unproductive', that is only because they have chosen to keep them that way. I always suspect that if you looked at these people's tax returns, you would quickly see that they actually expend effort to pay less in taxes. You have to track expenses and such, which if you did not, you would pay more. There are many things that they could do with their money and choose not to do. Seems like just some lame marketing for higher taxes that somehow many of the ones calling for it would never pay. (It is amazing how that works.)
Yes, indeed! If they want to pay more they are totally free to pay as much as they want. But we know that they are Full. Of. Shit.
Ideas so good, they must be made mandatory and enforced by guns.
"There is nothing more unjust than social justice," says Milei...
Donald J. Hitler has spoken.
So, if a liberal had a gun with one bullet and had Trump, Putin, and Hitler cornered, which one would she shoot?
They one that would make them feel the most virtuous.
That would be they self.
Herself, accidentally, assuming she could figure out how to work the safety.
Since Trump is just Hitler again, I think if they shot Hitler then Trump would just fade away, Back To The Future style.
Sorry, this was a trick question. Everyone knows liberals are allergic to guns.
The World Health Organization just released guidance-
Stop right there.
""If our elected officials refuse to address this concentration of money and power, the consequences will be dire," warned Cox."
Couldn't Cox just, you know, give all of his salary to the poor, if he was so damned gung-ho about it?
Not sure why the press acts like an actor who plays a role written by people smarter than he/she is an expert in the area of what their role is about.
Giving his money to me would solve problems too.
And he could still get a free ten thousand dollar tent on the street in SoCal.
Next, Captain O'Hagen will be instructing us to defund the Vermont State Police.
I don't want a large Farva. I want a goddamn liter o' cola!
And if your dumber than a Hollywood writer...you might be a redneck*.
*90s joke, most of the "rednecks" I know are geniuses.
Brian Cox should just fuck off.
Because even if Cox spent half his money on publicity about giving the other half to the poor, it would not provide the virtue masturbation of telling others what to do.
Yes, AI is a labor-replacing tool, what of it?
JUST WAIT UNTIL SKYNET STARTS POSTING LINKS.
We have to wait?
I thought Skynet ran several socks here.
Ai is a grievence study career replacwr
The left loves to be like “it’s all connected! Climate change, racism, Palestine, capitalism! It’s all one issue!”
And the leftist say they don't believe in a god.
to the chronic malcontents whose all-consuming envy will never be satiated it is all the same
They are correct. And the issue is deeply retarded psychosis.
Intersectionality weaponized.
Their god is suffering, and Marx is his profit. Hallowed be his name.
"“it’s all connected! Climate change, racism, Palestine, capitalism! It’s all one issue!”"
It is a very juvenile way of reasoning that they are frequently guilty of.
Well, juvenile if they truly think the things are connected (what dumb people do), disingenuous if they are just using "its all connected" because that means it can all be solved with one thing: more socialism (which is most often the actual case)
It is all connected in that it is all being used to destroy modern western civilization. Most of these dufuses likely believe they can have their cake and eat it, too. All the modern conveniences without the individual private property rights that make them possible.
Groups like Queers for Palestine don't seem to grasp the notion that Palestinians (Hamas, Islamists) would set them all up against the wall if there weren't any Jews to kill.
They say it in this way so they can justify tearing everything down to the ground, including destroying the foundation itself, in order to rebuild it in their image of the utopia of the communist revolution.
That's why they destroy statues, for example, just as the Maoists did during the Cultural Revolution, or remaking the entire calendar to fit within the Cult of Reason, as the Jacobins did during the French Revolution.
California legislators finally realized that banning tackle football for kids and teenagers was an insane idea all along.
They knew the culture shock would kill Cali children when their parents inevitably migrate the family to Texas and its football culture.
4.1 percent of all deaths were medically assisted in Canada in 2022.
More, if you count the mandated you-know-whats.
More died at the hands of Canadian government than Covid.
With MAID or from MAID?
You get a nasty cut and need stitches:
American health care: You get stitches – “that will be $32,000”
British healthcare: You don’t get stitches – “we will have a spot open for you in 32 months”
Canadian healthcare: "How ’bout you kill yourself?"
Nice
Gaza health care: Well we ran out of fuel 3 months ago but we'll work you into the schedule.
Also Gaza health care: It's a miracle, you've managed to come back to life from not-so-life-threatening-fake-injuries eight times!
We ran out of fuel three months ago, but we still have a few hours before we run out.
""British healthcare: You don’t get stitches – “we will have a spot open for you in 32 months”
Canadian healthcare: “How ’bout you kill yourself?”"
But it's """free"""! How can that be bad?
Neither. The butler did it!
*groan*
MAID must be the only medical service you can get in Canada without a referral from your non-existent primary care doctor.
How come they can humanely kill >4% of their population but not murders and rapists?
That's somehow different because fuck you, that's why.
What, are we suddenly opposed to euthanizing Canadians or something?
""I'm worried that authorities don't feel compelled to provide citizens with towns and cities that work, and feel safe, and offer slivers of shade and corners that don't smell of piss," wrote Chris Arnade for Unherd."
The bigger problem, IMO, is that the voters think paying a ton for shit service is, somehow, a noble goal and not a complete waste of the money people are stealing from them.
They'd rather be mugged than face that their desires have not led to a happy world.
does your city not have 3 assistant mayors each pulling down $200k a year who were selected solely on their intersectionality scores
One each for D, E, and I?
What does "authorities don’t feel compelled to provide citizens with towns and cities that work" even mean.
How are cities and towns supposed to work in their view?
"We ask you to tax us, the very richest in society," reads an open letter to the world leaders assembled in Davos, Switzerland, penned by 250 millionaires and billionaires who seem to be gluttons for punishment.
Knowing full fucking well they won't.
But what about taxing Musk?
The economic illiteracy of the heiress class is amazing.
It's not their WEALTH that's unproductive, it's their lifestyle. But they don't know how their wealth is invested because someone else does that.
It's their LIFESTYLE that diverts productive economic assets to unproductive leisure, literally burning it on private jet flights.
But they don't want to change their lifestyle. They want you to change the name on the ownership documents for their assets, but only in such a way that they don't notice any changes.
You have to see virtue signaling as a productive industry.
Leftists unironically believe that wealth and money are the same thing, which is rather ironic considering the Mark Hanna character in “Wolf of Wall Street” explicitly details that it is not, and that wealth has to be liquidated to actually result in money. The only person actually getting cold, hard cash is the person facilitating the investment when they get their fee.
Release the list.
It makes complete sense because the Uber wealthy always understand that tax dollars are wasted by the incompetent fools that collect them, but are a necessary evil to spend to keep the incompetent fools in power to protect that same wealth. Not fooling anyone.
Fascinating that those who are so concerned with climate change still feel comfortable flying private.
Supposedly concerned with climate change.
John Kerry says that’s a stupid question to ask.
Liz should have also mentioned the continued cries for control and censorship at Davos.
https://nypost.com/2024/01/17/opinion/the-elites-absurd-davos-crusade-destroy-freedom-to-save-humanity/
Koch said they couldn't.
Oh, and Milei? He flew commercial, saving taxpayers an estimated $392,000.
Actually, I don't agree with this. He's too precious a unicorn to be entrusted to Delta.
As a normal citizen, I'd be pissed if he was on my plane. I don't need his target on my back... just trying to live over here.
He's less likely to die in a fireball if he flies commercial. Private jet crashes have less investigations.
People were lining up to get selfies with him on the plane.
Is a private flight really 400 grand?
This might give some insight. Granted, it also covers renting a private jet. A government would probably own one.
https://www.afar.com/magazine/how-much-does-a-private-jet-cost
The cost of operating a gs5 is about $7300 per hour, davos is ~7500 miles from Argentina, that's about 120000 one direction, now add in its a 2 pilot crewed airplane and insurance
https://www.aircraftcostcalculator.com/AircraftOperatingCosts/187/Gulfstream+G550
My source,
Does that cover hookers and blow, or do I have to budget more for that?
Not sure, I'll ask hintee
Hunter was on the plane? I thought he was in court.
that shit comes with the room.
Twice the cost for Lolitas.
Yeah this is ridiculous. He is actually endangering everyone else on the plane. News flash, heads of state tend to be targets of assassination. Ordinary people, not so much. He was only able to get away with this, I imagine, because very few people outside of Argentina would recognize him as the President of Argentina.
They could all just stay home and conduct their hatred of us by zoom. That would be way safer for all of them.
And to satisfy Jeffy, they should be double-masked while doing so, eh?
We gonna need hourly boosters.
Yeah this is ridiculous. He is actually endangering everyone else on the plane.
This is panicky nonsense.
You realize that a commercial plane going down in a fireball, just because an anarcho-capitalist national leader happens to be flying coach, would kind of prove how malicious the political and credentialed classes actually are, right?
That they would unflinchingly murder dozens of innocent people if it meant taking this guy out would simply demonstrate that it needs to be open season on them at that point, too.
Doesn't mean they wouldn't do it anyway. But yes, I would appreciate the clear signal that it's go time.
He should fly private because 'If it saves one life...'
Better than Trans United.
As long as he doesn't get shown the door on a Boeing 737 max, I'm for it
'"We'd be proud to pay more," declares their website, which is thusly named. "This will not fundamentally alter our standard of living, nor deprive our children, nor harm our nations' economic growth. But it will turn extreme and unproductive private wealth into an investment for our common democratic future." Signatories include Disney and Rockefeller heiresses, as well as actor Brian Cox.'
They went on to say, "And make sure to tax Elon Musk even harder, since his use for billions of stolen dollars in things like electric cars, rocket ships, and satellite internet makes us look like blabbering idiots. And he said mean things about our friends."
+100 Starlink.
Until last month, I've never had quality high speed internet. Starlink has been a game changer.
100% chance that every single one of them has their tax specialist on day zero of this hypothetical wealth tax launch, and that somehow their assets move around in such a way that they dont end up paying any additional tax.
The important part: "This will not fundamentally alter our standard of living". Whether this is due to the fact that it will never come to pass, they would absolutely avoid it anyways, or that even if they did pay it they would still have enough money to fly around in jets, it makes the statement a complete throwaway. "So as a person with literally no skin in the game and nothing to lose..."
"unproductive private wealth into an investment for our common democratic future"??? Are people really this ignorant?
Gates, Bezos, Buffett, Rothschild,Bloomberg, Kerry, Walton not on the list.
Also missing Warren, Sanders, Thurnburg
A number of whom have already shunted billions of their personal wealth into their personal foundations, avoiding all the tax that might have accrued otherwise.
'It's always relative wealth, which allows signatories to ignore the vast standard-of-living gains that have been made over the last century.'
No, no, no, no. If coddled Americans feel bad about themselves or others, then they are correct about the inhuman suffering, despite these victims enjoying material comforts, health, security, and freedom that the richest moguls and most powerful dictators of 100 years ago could not even dream about.
Hey, forget about the fact that the middle class today in America has access to amount and kinds of food that kings of the past could only dream of, a supercomputer in your pocket that has access to all of the information and entertainment the world has to offer, and quality/length of life that is substantially better...forget about the fact that the even low/modest income people in America have significantly better quality of life than so much of the rest of the world today...
John Jones down the street has a 7000 sqft mcmansion and a lambo therefore inequality is rampant and everything is terrible!!!
…..and unfair. Don’t forget that part.
'"Today I am here to tell you that the Western world is in danger, and it's in danger because those who are supposed to defend the values of the West are co-opted by a vision of the world that inexorably leads to socialism, and thereby to poverty," said Milei. "Unfortunately, in recent decades, motivated by some well-meaning individuals willing to help others, and others motivated by the desire to belong to a privileged class, the main leaders of the Western world have abandoned the model of freedom for different versions of what we call collectivism."'
Somebody is not going to get invited next year.
The only false part of that statement is well meaning
So exactly when will we pass a tax restricted to that 250 people? *
Say 200% of all income, 'earned' or not?
Designate the additional revenue for a southern border wall.
Should be a bi-partisan gimme; tax the rich for the left, the wall for the right.
* we can tax them because I am sure they own US stocks
Mexico is paying for the wall.
'Can someone please check in on the NYC media class? They're obsessed with polyamory right now, and the rest of us are bored.'
Just another stage in the increasing delusion and detachment of the ruling class?
'"I'm worried that authorities don't feel compelled to provide citizens with towns and cities that work, and feel safe, and offer slivers of shade and corners that don't smell of piss," wrote Chris Arnade for Unherd.'
Yup.
I actually agree with this too. Government should first and foremost focus on the basics. Have properly functioning basic services.
That means the left-wingers should stop distracting government with all of the less relevant nonsense that they insist government should do. It also means that the right-wingers should stop complaining about every single penny that government spends, and recognize that SOME expenses by government are legitimate.
“It also means that the right-wingers should stop complaining about every single penny that government spends, and recognize that SOME expenses by government are legitimate.”
That is like saying you can’t complain about you wife’s spending habits which include lots of money on shoes and designer handbags because she also spends a fraction of it on the grocery bill.
Idiotic Boaf Sidez. Right wingers do not complain about every single penny.
Criticize the right constantly, Cant criticize the left without making it Boaf Sidez.Totally not a leftist
When I started reading his comment I knew it would end with a boaf sidez, wondering what less relevant nonsense the right spends money on he would bring. It ended being more retarded than I guessed.
They hate their families
The Smithsonian told them that families are White Culture privilege. They don't want any of that.
Oh, and Milei? He flew commercial, saving taxpayers an estimated $392,000.
YES! There is no reason on God's green Earth why a president or prime minister needs to fly a private plane at huge taxpayer expense when we have plenty of good, less expensive commercial options. Get rid of the motorcades as well.
See my comment above. I don't need a president on my plane, putting his target on my back. But I whole heartedly agree with eliminating the motorcade, so that traffic isn't snarled in my city the few times a year one of those fancy assholes comes rolling through... again, just trying to live over here.
I feel that presidents and prime ministers should live as normal people, not royalty. That mean fly commercial, drive in traffic, and deal with the same shit we all put up with.
I'm sure you won't mind being blown up by the bomb that was intended for the president driving his sedan in the car next to yours.
Maybe if we didn't treat them as royalty, the bomb crap wouldn't happen.
That is absurd. Heads of state tend to be assassinated not because they are treated well. They tend to be assassinated because they have power due to their position, and his/her opponents desire to stop that individual from exercising that power.
You are living in fantasy land here.
So you believe they should be treated as royalty, Jeffy? Who would've thought there'd be "libertarians for monarchy".
You can criticize them, just don't dehumanize them. You will trigger fatty in a way that you don't want to deal with.
This unserious response demonstrates that you just want to argue against me for the sake of arguing against me, troll.
Yet, Jeffy, you were the one who felt compelled to reply to my comment. You solicited the argument, and now you want to blame me for getting into the argument with you that you distinctly solicited.
Who's the troll then?
Take away most of their power, and we have fewer problems.
I feel that too. I guess I'll just say that I don't want the elites near me as I try to live my life.
I think your worry is overblown. A plane is not necessarily more susceptible to sabotage and any other public place. Would you be afraid if the president walked into a ice cream shop you happened to be at? Even if something was scheduled, like Biden on a trail on his bicycle or a Trump rally, I’d argue those places are equally bombable as planes.
They're probably more bombable (and more dangerous) than planes these days (post-PanAm 103 and post-9/11). A plane is probably one of the safer places to be (other than the door insert blowing off a 737 MAX9, but that's a different issue).
So you're totally cool if Joe Biden get's sucked out of a commercial jet and dies in a mangled heap in a cornfield in flyover country? Now that I think about it you probably shouldn't answer that.
Perhaps. But if Biden walks into an ice cream shop I'm at, I can immediately shuffle my daughters out of there before their hair is up his nostrils. Even if I have to leave ice cream on the table, it's a very minor cost compared to exiting the plane as soon as he enters. And once the plane takes off, I can't change my mind about leaving.
That’s a fair point but it could be handled by alerting all the other passengers that he’ll be on the plane.
I will say, Air Force One is WAAAAAAYYYYY down the list of budget items I want to cut.
Except they just don't walk in. Secret service comes and clears the shop or makes it acceptable risk.
Hell, I work at Johnson space center. George Bush senior was here in a wheel chair (Few years ago). Even though it's a government building with access control, the secret service still would not even let you in the same hallway.
I get what your saying, and I could support it in a reasonable society but do you really want President Trump in a commercial aircraft? Imagine all the liberals crying. I imagine the attacks by liberals with..well not guns but scissors or something.
I think presidents should fly private. Now, dicks like Kerry they can fly commerical.
'"There is nothing more unjust than social justice," says Milei'
Hey, do you want equality or equity?
Either way we'll have to deal with disparate impact.
'The U.S. launched even more strikes against Iran-backed Yemeni Houthis (which the Biden administration redesignated as a terrorist organization yesterday).'
And as an official Terrorist Organization, you get 10% off your next delivery of bomb craters.
Neo-Nazi With Felony Convictions Cleared to Remain on GOP Ballot
The North Carolina Board of Elections ruled that Joseph Gibson III is eligible to run for a state House seat.
A neo-Nazi with prior felony convictions will be allowed to remain on the GOP ballot in North Carolina, the State Board of Elections ruled unanimously this week.
.
Joseph Gibson III is running for the second time for a seat in North Carolina’s House of Representatives in District 65, which encompasses Rockingham County and shares a border with Virginia.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/pka8dk/neo-nazi-joseph-gibson-remain-gop-2024-ballot-nc-house-representatives
Not all Repubs are Nazis but all Nazis are Republicans.
Even the ones breaking the windows of Jewish shops and screaming death to Jews in the streets lately? Because they sure sound like Democrats.
What about the guys running political prosecution gambits against the Democratic Party's main challenger?
Or how about all the guys currently arguing in newspapers that freedom of speech is a threat to democracy? Did they suddenly stop being team blue?
What about fifty-centers who argue right here in the comments that political profiling by the government is a good thing? Because that sounds totally Nazi-ish.
I despise Islamo-fascists.
Islam is the “mother lode of bad ideas” – Sam Harris. You are profoundly stupid if you don’t remember that I despise religion.
Also, you idiot, when did I say profiling was a "good thing"?
Still fascist to do any of that, you fucking Nazi.
"when did I say profiling was a “good thing”?"
Twenty comments up, you dishonest fuck.
This?
Not a deep state at all, moron.
It is called criminal profiling. Repubs used to call it Stop and Frisk
You seriously cannot process word meanings.
How did I say profiling was “good”? Are you that much of a simpleton?
Don’t bother. We know you are.
turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.
Still full retard.
Not a deep state at all, moron. It is called criminal profiling. Repubs used to call it Stop and Frisk."
Sounds like an implied endorsement to me, you fascist fuck.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Shut your blowjob hole, Sevo. You stunted moron.
Go take your Droxy like Donnie told you to. You're spinning out again.
turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Also, Convicted NC candidate with neo-Nazi ties to stay on ballot despite 'political assassination' from GOP
and
North Carolina House candidate from Rockingham County removed from primary ballot, local GOP officials say
Now tell us all about Robert Byrd, Pluggo.
turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
'The World Health Organization just released guidance stating that the evidence supporting "gender-affirming care" for children is actually "limited and variable." National Review has more.'
Translation from WHO speak to English: "gender-affirming care" is the worst thing we have done to children in the past 100 years and a crime against humanity.
So, who is telling these migrants to go north to the US?
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/journalist-uncovers-shadowy-network-ngos-facilitating-us-border-invasion
This sounds like the government hiring a contractor to help transport migrants who have shown up. What is the suspicious part?
Oh wait, this is an attempt to turn an ordinary activity into some shadowy sinister plot. Probably as part of O'Keefe's latest grift.
Of course running millions of illegals to different parts of the country isn't shadowy. That's just business as usual.
Deliberately collapsing infrastructure totally isn't sinister either.
Up here even our most leftist province is begging the Globalists to stop: 'Breaking point': Legault asks Trudeau to slow influx of asylum seekers
"Asylum seekers have trouble finding a place to live, which contributes to accentuating the housing crisis," the letter said. "Many end up in homeless shelters, which are overflowing." He said organizations that help asylum seekers can't keep up with demand. Legault said the children of asylum seekers are also straining schools that already have a shortage of teachers and space. The premier reminded Trudeau that asylum seekers who are waiting for work permits receive financial assistance from Quebec. Last October, some 43,200 asylum seekers received $33 million in aid."
Remember though, calling this "population replacement" is somehow bad according to Jeffy.
RE: Canadian euthanasia. Are they keeping track of where they bury the bodies so people in the future have an easier time finding evidence for state-sponsored genocide?
'Yes, AI is a labor-replacing tool, what of it?'
Between AI, massive immigration, and DEI, white guys will never have to work again.
Some fake scandal, eh.
https://www.thecentersquare.com/national/article_efaf6934-b57c-11ee-94b0-bbb825710c35.html
@colorblindk1d
Still insane to me that random US city governments, teachers unions, and baristas have meetings and hold votes on what their policy is with regard to a military conflict between two foreign entities on the other side of the world.
It is hilarious, sad, and scary, all at once.
Thank public education.
Well well, a rare moment of honesty from Trump. From his defamation trial:
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/01/17/politics/takeaways-e-jean-carroll-testimony-trump-defamation-trial/index.html
Hmm. Why would someone "love" to be kicked out of a courtroom for being a jerk? Answer: it's his plan all along, to turn the trial into a circus, to be such an obnoxious jerk that he gets thrown out, then he can go in front of the cameras and claim he's a total victim and a martyr. It is just so phony-baloney and deeply cynical.
OK, let's add some more context here. Judge Lewis A. Kaplan was appointed by Bill Clinton back in 1994. Thus, he's a a loyal Democrat, not necessarily a neutral party here. He's the one who decided that, even though Trump did nor said anything to Carroll, that Carroll was the aggrieved party here, and denying her allegations of sexual assault some how constituted defamation of Carroll. I would be pissed with this sort of kangaroo court crappola as well.
Doesn't that strike you as just wrong, Jeffy, to consider denials of sexual assault (including a court case that found that the sexual assault never happened) to be defamation? I don't give a shit who it is here. It's bullshit to do what Judge Kaplan has done.
Will you stop this for a moment? I’m not talking about the merits of the defamation case itself. I’m talking about Trump’s behavior in the courtroom. I point out that he is making a mockery of the whole thing and cynically manipulating it for his own benefit, and you immediately deflect from that and want to talk about the merits of the case itself.
This is why I call you a Trump cultist. You cannot bring yourself to criticize what Trump is doing even when it is clearly wrong. You ALWAYS have to deflect away from his behavior. That is what cultists do. They defend their cult leader right or wrong.
Trump’s behavior here has nothing to do with politics or ideology. It is about simple decorum and decency.
So I ask again: what do you think of Trump's behavior here? Right or wrong?
Thanks for the false dilemma fallacy, Jeffy. Why don't you tell us how you would feel if you were the subject of a false sexual assault case, a case that was decided in your favor, and now you're facing a court that believes you guilty (civilly, not criminally) of defamation merely because you denied said false sexual assault?
I would feel upset. I would also think that my anger does not entitle me to break the rules of the courtroom.
Furthermore, that is not what is really going on here. Trump WANTS to be thrown out because he wants to go on TV to claim he's a victim and a martyr (oh and won't you send him some more money to help him out).
Do you think Trump is entitled to break all the rules of the courtroom just because he's upset, like a spoiled little child?
Do you think Trump is trying to manipulate the situation to use his trial as a means to claim martyr status?
How dare he break the rules of the court room. Even a moron like you would be pissed if you have spent week after week in courtrooms for clearly bullshit charges and lawsuits.
He doesn’t HAVE to be there. He CHOOSES to be there. He didn’t show up for the first trial after all.
Furthermore, adults who are not spoiled little children understand that one's emotional state of mind does not entitle one to break all the rules and throw a tantrum in public.
So he CHOSE to be there, and then he CHOSE to break the rules of the courtroom.
Once again, you give him the benefit of the doubt. What a surprise.
Damn, the derangement syndrome coming off this comment is powerful enough to knock over an elephant.
there we go. now it's 'derangement' to call out Trump's obviously bad behavior.
go fuck off, Trump cultist
there we go. now it’s ‘derangement’ to call out Trump’s obviously bad behavior.
It's the tried-and-true ad hominem defense. Calling you deranged dismisses your argument and makes it about you, not Trump's behavior.
Did it ever occur to you that it's not necessarily what you say, but how you say it that comes off as deranged. Let's pull apart your comment for a moment.
1. There's several instances where you choose to use all-caps even though all-caps probably isn't even remotely warranted. The Squirrel does this rather often.
2. You assume that I merely give him the benefit of the doubt when I asked you, directly, how you would feel in the same position. You might want to try puting yourself in someone else's shoes for a moment before pouncing all over them.
3. I told you how I felt early on, "I would be pissed with this sort of kangaroo court crappola as well." Maybe making a comment and walking out would bring more attention to the craziness being promulgated by the court. Sitting and merely taking it never seems to draw any attention to this shit.
4. You also assume I'm a Trump cultist. I voted for him 1 time out of 3, voting for someone else those 2 other times. And that was because I despise Biden.
Grow up, Jeffy, walk a mile in someone else's shoes, and stop living in fear.
yup, it happens over and over again:
Normal person: Look at this terrible thing that Trump did/said. Isn't that terrible?
Trump cultist: I'm going to ignore your question and deflect and ask a different question that is only tangentially related.
Normal person: But that wasn't the topic that I brought up. What do you think of the terrible thing that Trump did?
Trump cultist: Why won't you answer MY question? Why are you avoiding me? Is it because you are a LEFTY LEFTIST??????
Normal person: No, I just want to get back to the original topic that I raised, which was about Trump's terrible behavior....
Trump cultist: YOU'RE A DERANGED TRUMP HATER!!!!!!!!
it is just so old and so obvious
Sarc, if you ever understood what an ad hominem is, you might be somewhat partially dangerous.
Here's a primer on fallacies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCg-SNOteQQ
Ad Hominem is at 0:00.
Ad hominem is arguing against the person. For example accusing them of being fearful or deranged in order to dismiss their argument. It's the go-to here in these comments.
You know, ITL, a non-Trump-cultist would not give him the benefit of the doubt every fucking time. Trump has many, many, MANY character flaws, and Trump has done many, many, MANY things and said many, many, MANY things that are just wrong. And you can’t bring yourself to criticize even one of them on its own, without whataboutisms or deflections.
You won’t call out Trump’s ‘vermin’ comment. You won’t call out Trump’s ‘poisoning the blood’ comment. You won’t call out his behavior here, where he deliberately wants to provoke the judge to throw him out so that he can go on TV and claim he’s a victim and a martyr.
You just won’t criticize the man. That is what cultists do.
You just won’t criticize the man. That is what cultists do.
Cue up the "Where's your criticism of Biden?" response in 3...2...
"It’s the tried-and-true ad hominem defense. Calling you deranged dismisses your argument and makes it about you, not Trump’s behavior."
Read the fucking thread you cheap fucking troll, and explain to us how Jeff's argument WASN'T fallacious, instead of just practicing kneejerk agreement with the Nazi.
explain to us how Jeff’s argument WASN’T fallacious
I think his observations of Trump's courtroom behavior, and the motive behind it, is quite accurate. Can you address Trump's behavior, or are you only capable of attacking people who criticize it? I won't check back for an answer because I know it's the latter.
"Can you address Trump’s behavior"
A man exasperated with a kangaroo court and a witchburning. Nothing these courts have done deserve anything but utter contempt, and if you were the slightest bit honest you'd note that too.
Just say it, you two:
you totally support Trump acting like a spoiled little child and acting in ways that you would never tolerate in any other adult human being, because Trump is Trump and he's pwning the libs.
furthermore you totally support Trump manipulating his trials and turning them into a circus and a platform to claim martyrdom even when he deliberately provokes being the 'victim', even though you would never support such conduct in any other adult human being, because Trump is Trump and he's pwning the libs.
that is what you really believe, isn't it?
They will support anything and everything that Trump does, and defend it by dismissing critics as deranged. That way they don't have to actually defend his behavior. I'm not sure if they're cowards who know they can't win, if they know that they're engaging in fallacious arguments and don't care, or if they're so stupid they think personal attacks actually win debates. Cowards, liars, or morons. You pick.
It is funny watching you two non libertarians team up to applaud state abuse against someone you hate and then cry when called out on it.
Please, either of you, defend the monetary outcome of this suit. She is a public figure. Used the claims to make money, not injured. Worked with NYC to manufacture a temporary law developed to go after Trump. Relied on claims decades old says any hard evidence.
You two morons literally applaud lawfare. Because of who it is used against.
When actual libertarians point out this bullshit, you claim they are in a cult.
You two are just leftist, state loving, lawfare abuse applauding clowns. Lol.
Also the laugh half of your post is laughable projection. Lol.
Jeff's a Nazi and Sarc's a bitter drunken troll. That's the whole reason.
you're just proving my point even more as you deflect and avoid the original topic.
go ahead, criticize Trump's behavior on its own merits, without deflecting, without whataboutisms, without referring to Obama or Biden or anyone else.
Can you do it? I bet you can't.
I'm not defending the suit, nor do I applaud lawfare. Those are just boilerplate lies that you put into all your comments. Like the boilerplate lies police put into reports and testimony. You should have been a cop.
No, I'm saying that you guys dismiss criticism of Trump's behavior by attacking the critic. Like you're doing now.
You’re literally attacking anyone who criticizes the lawsuit dumdum. You continue to claim anyone who criticizes the state abuses is a cultist or will never criticize Trump.
Who the hell do you think you are fooling?
No, I’m saying that you guys dismiss criticism of Trump’s behavior by attacking the critic. Like you’re doing now.
Where in this thread do you even discuss any aspect of the case? All you've done is attack those criticizing the court and the judge. There are lots of issues with this case. People who are paying attention and are libertarian are criticizing the case. Yet you attack those people. LOL. You've made no legal argument. Jeff didn't even make it.
You two seem upset that someone who is currently involved in multiple state abuses is reacting to said abuses. You're a clown. Instead of criticizing the case, you continue to imply consent by attacking the person whose rights are being abused across the nation and anyone pointing out that he has a point.
You're a joke sarc. A leftist joke.
You’re literally attacking anyone who criticizes the lawsuit dumdum.
No I'm not. And I've criticized the lawsuit plenty. Though not for the same reasons as you.
Where in this thread do you even discuss any aspect of the case?
That wasn't the topic. The topic was Trump's behavior. So the rest of your post is nothing but a red herring.
You’ve made no legal argument. Jeff didn’t even make it.
At least in my case, you're right, because that wasn't the point of my comment! I'm not attacking or defending the merit of the lawsuit. I'm criticizing Trump's behavior in the courtroom and how he is acting like a spoiled child and how he is using the trial to become a fake martyr.
You cannot criticize Trump's behavior, full stop. That makes you no better than a Trump cultist. That is what cultists do, believe in the infallibility of their cult leader. That is you.
As I understand it, before this incident, the Judge rejected an appeal by Trump's attorney to reschedule the court proceedings the next day or so so that Trump could go with Melania to her mother's funeral. A one-day adjournment so the defendant can go to the funeral for a family member is almost always granted in these situations, as I understand. The judge was being a petty dick by refusing the request. That is why Trump and his lawyers were upset in this particular incident, which directly proceeded the denial of the request.
Did Donnie throw his ketchup again?
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit an asshole and a pederast besides.
I’m not talking about the merits of the defamation case itself. I’m talking about Trump’s behavior in the courtroom. I point out that he is making a mockery of the whole thing and cynically manipulating it for his own benefit, and you immediately deflect from that and want to talk about the merits of the case itself.
If the entire claim is meritless bullshit, laughable on his face, perhaps the process deserves to be mocked.
Do you think he's entitled to act like a spoiled child in the courtroom because he thinks he's being treated unfairly?
Do you think it is right that he is manipulating the trial to his benefit, deliberately provoking the judge to throw him out so that he can go on TV and cry crocodile tears about how he is a victim and a martyr?
He's not a victim. He's The Victim ©. And he's not a martyr. That's Ashi's turf.
And you claim to want rational conversation and aren't a cult leftist at this point.
If you agree the case has no merit, and are focused only on behaviors, you're the unprincipled ones here. You and Jeff are going out of your way to attack the victim of the lawfare. You and Jeff go out of your way to mock an unarmed woman shot by capitol officers who got medals for doing so.
Neither of you have any principles.
And the bold here... is that why you're so upset? You want to be The Victim?
Boilerplate lies. You should have been a cop.
Yet, you stand 100% behind the cop that shot an unarmed woman.
I stand behind the police when they're acting in good faith. That cop did what he thought was right based upon what he knew, saw and heard at the time. The cops that disgust me are the ones who operate in bad faith, who know they're lying and who know they're wrong, who attack anyone who doesn't stroke their ego, and do what they do anyway because they're mendacious pieces of shit. Like JesseAz. Which is why I say he missed his true calling.
I stand behind the police when they’re acting in good faith.
Can we hold you to that the next time you go all ACAB in an article?
Hey another good faith defense for sarc. Seems to be his go to whenever he is defending something that violates the principles he claims to have. Can't define good faith, do catch all for all his hypocrisy.
"He’s The Victim©."
He really is, you fascist fuck.
Jeff also missed Carroll admitted to destroying evidence under subpeona for the trial and Judge Kaplan tried to protect her from questioning from Trumps lawyers in regards to this and other issues.
there we go. deflect deflect deflect, try to make it about Carroll instead of about Trump
No, of course Cartman doesn't consider it wrong to persecute Trump any way even plausibly feasible. Fatass Retarded Imperialist spunks his shorts at the notion.
Why give legitimacy to institutions that hate your guts?
So what books really don't make it into school libraries?
https://www.thefp.com/p/the-truth-about-banned-books
Nothing to see here, just protecting democracy. Move along.
But Republicans want to indoctrinate kids!!!1!1
“We'd be proud to pay more," declares their website
Instead of creating a virtual signaling letter and/or website, they should feel free to send their checks here:
Gifts to the United States
U.S. Department of the Treasury
Reporting and Analysis Branch 2
P.O. Box 1328
Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328
And leave the rest of us alone.
"...And leave the rest of us alone."
Most important part of the post. TY.
But then how can they assuage their guilt and self-loathing?
Also online. Easy-peasy. No excuses.
"Currently, nobody is forcing them to keep their earnings."
You gotta wonder if someone isn't forcing hypocrisy on them.
That shit-bag Buffett spent tons of money defending his use of charter jets as other-then-income for tax purposes, all the lecturing the rest of us on how he only took $100K as income and we should all pay higher taxes.
But it will turn extreme and unproductive private wealth into an investment for our common democratic future."
Every single one of these cucks inherited their money, of that I have no doubt.
No way they actually worked for it or they would NEVER characterize their own money that way.
Oh, and Milei? He flew commercial, saving taxpayers an estimated $392,000.
Please, please, PLEASE can we get one of our own here in america?
Would you want to fly on the same plane as a person who is a huge assassination target?
Why do you believe elected officials are royalty, Jeffy?
They're not "royalty". I do live in reality though. In the real world, heads of state are targets of assassination at a much higher rate than most other people. And most assassins don't really give a shit about collateral damage.
Would you want to fly on a plane with someone who is a huge assassination target?
Why do you live in fear, Jeffy?
you're a troll and an idiot.
Just because it's something you don't like doesn't make the other person a troll nor an idiot. One could easily claim similar regarding you. Sealion, troll, idiot, dishonest debater.
your argument is unserious and ridiculous, you are obviously just arguing against me for the sake of arguing against me.
not subjecting everyone else to unnecessary risk by flying in a private plane instead of flying coach is not “treating the president like royalty”, it is basic risk management. sheesh.
It is also more respectful of "the common folk" to not unnecessarily risk their lives, instead of to send a pointless virtue signal about how much you identify with "the common folk".
Dude, he already declared victory and sat back with a smug sneer after making the argument about you instead of what you said.
You do realize you're knob polishing an authoritarian, right?
Have you ever actually read the shit Jeff posts here, Sarcasmic?
Nah, I doubt he's read much of it. As far as Sarc seems to be concerned, the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
Will you look at that. More ad hominems. "Dismiss what sarc said because he's friends with jeff." Shocking.
*yawn*
blah blah blah, look all the mean girls have shown up and they can now start their circle jerk of insults
“Dismiss what sarc said because he’s friends with jeff.” Shocking.
What's actually shocking is that you want to be friends with a guy who advocates the shit Jeff advocates.
That wasn’t an ad hom, sarc.
(Edit: fucking threading)
I swear he gets these wrong deliberately. It's so frequent and he's been corrected so many times now.
Yes.
If I was gonna die because I was near some VIP, then there was nothing I could have done about it.
Stop living in fear.
There IS something that the VIP could have done about it though, and that is to not risk everyone else’s life with some virtue signal about ‘identifying with the common folk’ and choosing to fly in a separate plane.
This is just an absurd discussion here. You really want the president to fly coach, even though the risk of everyone else on the plane dying goes way up? For what purpose? To save a few bucks? To send the right message?
Not only that, but Air Force One at least is equipped with jammers, flares, and chaff. Last I checked commercial planes were not.
I know, right?
This is where the libertarian/small-government impulse to "save a few bucks" gets into absurd territory. Yes the government wastes a lot of money, yes the government needs to cut spending WAY back. But the government shouldn't cut spending stupidly. Cutting spending on something like private travel for heads of state is just ridiculous and dangerous.
The same thing happened yesterday - I pointed out that one reason why it takes so long to process asylum claims for migrants claiming asylum is that there aren't enough judges and resources to process all of the claims in an efficient and expedient manner. And of course the usual suspects chimed in and said OH SO YOU WANT BIGGER GOVERNMENT????? No, I don't want big government for the sake of big government, but when we all agree that the government should perform some task, the government should have the resources necessary - no more and no less - to do that task efficiently and effectively. Saying "we want the government to do X but we won't give you the resources to do X" is not libertarian, it is just stupid.
Congress critters can fly coach for all I care. But not assassination targets. Like you said, it risks the lives of everyone on the plane.
Fine. Then let the Dear Leader and his entourage, press corps, and fan boys buy all the tickets on a regular commercial flight. That would save us money, and if a rouge activist with a Stinger brings down the plane, we can have a government reset.
That would be just as acceptable as a private plane, sure.
Not only that, but Air Force One at least is equipped with jammers, flares, and chaff. Last I checked commercial planes were not.
Right. Off the top of your head, can you tell me the last time Air Force One had to deploy flares and chaff?
And the movie doesn't count.
Are you arguing that because it hasn't happened that it will never happen? I think there's a term for that fallacy, but I don't know off the top of my head.
There's always research. You have a computer to access this forum, therefore, use it to look stuff up.
>>virtue signal about ‘identifying with the common folk’
jeebus fucking cripes they used to ride trains everywhere just to talk to the people do you ever think before you type?
Fear it is then.
It’s not like you know who is or isn’t an assassination target in any given public situation.
Would you want to fly on the same plane as a person who is a huge assassination target?
ISIS: Death to America!
You mean like the kind of president who would donate his entire salary?
Currently, nobody is forcing them to keep their earnings. They have full freedom to do whatever they'd like with their money—including giving it away to charity ....
But that does not give them the authority to tell the rest of us what to do with our money.
HUNTER BIDEN FAKE SCANDAL UPDATE!
Hunter Biden's gun pouch contained cocaine residue, prosecutor reveals
Biden has argued a plea agreement that would have allowed him to resolve gun charges should be honored, but the prosecutor contends he is being treated like any other defendant.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2024/01/17/hunter-biden-gun-case-cocaine-residue/72253358007/
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
"We ask you to tax us, the very richest in society,"
Oh this is such bullshit. They are free to donate their money to whatever cause they wish, including any government that they wish, at any time.
"Trump supporters cite his economic record as a reason to vote for him, but that's a bit puzzling. Because his economic record is only good if you leave off what happened from March 2020 to the end of his administration."
https://notthebee.com/article/enjoy-the-ratio-on-this-story-from-one-of-our-favorite-objective-news-outlets-the-comment-section-is-
It is evidence of our shitty media.
When Donnie lies and says his economy was the best ever the follow up question should be "By what measure? It is certainly not GDP or UE."
They let that fucker lie 24/7.
turd always lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.
Gee what happened in March 2020 Shriek?
It's not puzzling at all. If the end of his administration counted then Trump would be partly responsible for the massive increase in federal spending and debt, as well as the resulting inflation and crappy economy. It must be ignored and denied.
Yeah, it's not like there was a super contagious virus that came from China... "it must be ignored and denied". The economy change in March 2020 happened for absolutely no reason! You heard it here first, folks.
None of the Davos attendees are in any way going to face any actual consequences for what they tell the rest of us to do. They all have a level of "escape velocity" that will keep them well above the hoi polloi. All the better to be so noble about their "sacrifices."
Newsflash.
No one listens to them.
Tell us later about that when they implement the policies they learn at Davos.
Gee, did you know turd lies?
Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2
April.20.2021 at 10:47 pm
“Ashli Babbitt attacked the USA much like the 9/11 hijackers did.”
as well as actor Brian Cox.
WHO?!!
"I'm worried that authorities don't feel compelled to provide citizens with towns and cities that work, and feel safe, and offer slivers of shade and corners that don't smell of piss," wrote Chris Arnade for Unherd. "But I'm also worried about the cultural forces that have got us here: that they allow the tolerably well-off to ignore the plight of those who are forced to depend on public services. The regulatory mindset is a problem that can be easily changed; the more pernicious part is that we are now firmly a low-trust society, and social trust impacts everything—every facet of life—and it can't simply be legislated back."
Check out Jordan Peterson over here…
Check out Jordan Peterson over here...
Best response tweet:
Good point, because you probably won't get one at Reason.
The World Health Organization just released guidance stating that the evidence supporting "gender-affirming care" for children is actually "limited and variable." National Review has more.
"limited and variable" my 9" dick. This is the waffle of the fucking century.
"we're really, really sorry ..."
Wow, from quick hits down, Liz Wolfe went full Jordan Peterson. Reason, shut up and take my money.
What is so good about that guy?
I just hear of lot of self-help garbage from him. Granted, the extent of my exposure to him has been on Real Time.
Maybe you might learn something.
'12 Rules for Life' has some decent ideas in it.
12 rules for life is, to be fair, essentially a self-help book. I haven't read it, but I know much of what's in it by virtue of hearing a large amount of his other talks.
However, his critiques of social justice, our increasingly low-trust society, equity vs equality before the law, the abandonment of classic liberalism etc in favor of diversity politics, is where he tends to anger people.
and by angering people, I mean anger the right people.
I've read it - it's basically boiled down to 'Fix your own self before you try to solve worldwide problems with humanity, and here's a few areas probably everyone could work on'. It's not bad, has decent reasoning.
Not as exciting as his YouTube interviews.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is aTDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
“What is so good about that guy?”
Former Harvard psychologist who’s been pointing out the cultic aspects of DEI and the Trans movement, and critical of Covid authoritarianism. He’s like a smarter Bill Maher without the bitterness and arrogance.
Sounds reasonable. He is well-spoken. I did not get a conservative vibe from him.
IOW he is not Fox News - AM radio material.
He's got principles and makes actual arguments, instead of calling anyone who disagrees with him deranged. He wouldn't fit into the MAGA tribe one little bit.
Dumbfuck! It's not conservatives or MAGA that's sending him to re-education camp.
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/toronto/jordan-peterson-court-challenge-rejection-1.7086681
The TDS-addled asshole turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Peterson has some good all around advice that people, especially young men, need to hear. The "clean your room" thing is a meme now, but honestly, it really is good stuff.
And he is very much on the correct side of the culture war stuff, but, I find him a bit wacky and think half the time he is playing a the provocateur and part of him wants to be in the mud.
Also he's got a bit of a weird illogical part to him as well when he discusses his health issues, he makes these fantastical connections to both his health issues and his diet that we usually see more of in the less educated part of the population which is interesting. Ill have to find the Rogan episode im thinking of, but I remember specifically he says a lot of stuff there that made me scratch my head a little bit and think "this is something one of our medicaid patients would say and believe"
Anyways, I do think he has the right take on quite a bit, but prefer a Douglas Murray type to deliver the message.
Oh also, I think he toured with Dave Rubin for a while, and that guy is and will always be a fucking clown.
>>"We ask you to tax us, the very richest in society," reads an open letter to the world leaders assembled in Davos
every fucking year I ask Santa Claus to nuke Davos but he never comes through.
He is still waiting for the approval of a permit to transport fissionable material.
>>"Unfortunately, in recent decades, motivated by some well-meaning individuals willing to help others, and others motivated by the desire to belong to a privileged class, the main leaders of the Western world have abandoned the model of freedom for different versions of what we call collectivism."
who let him say this out loud?
Hey Peanuts, I bought a new Bitcoin ETF last week. I figured if Blackrock was getting into BTC it might get a price boost.
I dumped it at a small loss today. It's boring.
If blackrock is getting interested in BTC, then that's your cue to sell.
BlackRock on pace to become largest bitcoin holder in the world
With nearly 11,500 bitcoin in a bitcoin-focused offering, the world’s largest asset manager has quickly accumulated $500 million of crypto.
https://www.thestreet.com/crypto/markets/blackrock-becoming-largest-bitcoin-holder-in-world
Don't bet against Larry Fink.
Betting against Larry Find increasingly looks like a good bet.
Larry Find is finding that the invisible hand can be a real bitch.
The TDS addled turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's comprehension.
Your entire post is a lie.
caveat I believe the author’s hands are tied by the benefactors so I will post here there are two missing Navy Seals and a bunch of American hostages still being held by terrorists. thank you for the forum.
Thanks for reminding us all.
Local news.
Navy Seals in Gaza?
Hostages are hostages. Don't downplay this.
>>"But I'm also worried about the cultural forces that have got us here: that they allow the tolerably well-off to ignore the plight of those who are forced to depend on public services.
is Road to Serfdom not available in infinite formats?
It's about time someone went into the lion's den and forcefully defended free market capitalism.
This guy oughta be President or something.
And there you have the problem defined.
You cannot force people to be free.
But the fascists can force people to obey.
Milei reminds me a lot of Regan, he sure talks a good talk. However, I haven't seen any news report that shows him doing much of anything yet, and that which he has looks really bad, particularly the request to give ultimate power to the executive without oversite for the next 2 years until he gets the current situation under control.
LOL, shut the fuck up, commie.
>>National Review has more.
obligatory meh although I hear French is now @NYT which is entirely more fitting
It’s a million percent upgrade from the usual old Vox, TechDirt, etc links
>>Can someone please check in on the NYC media class? They're obsessed with polyamory right now, and the rest of us are bored.
those guys? like in an I'm not enough for my wife please do too her way or in a we want to see the nuclear family destroyed now more than ever way?
"We'd be proud to pay more," declares their website, which is thusly named. "This will not fundamentally alter our standard of living, nor deprive our children, nor harm our nations' economic growth. But it will turn extreme and unproductive private wealth into an investment for our common democratic future." Signatories include Disney and Rockefeller heiresses, as well as actor Brian Cox.
So how would giving this extra wealth to His Majesty King Charles III turn "extreme and unproductive private wealth into an investment for our common democratic future"?
Every person who signed that letter should be required to disclose his or her tax returns for the past 10 years. If they so much has took one penny in Turkey a tax deduction or tax credit, it proves that they are full of shit.
...
What's with the elevated sidewalk?
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/4fc65b8/2147483647/strip/true/crop/4032x3024+0+0/resize/630x473!/quality/90/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstatic.politico.com%2F48%2F37%2F18f3dcf6481a8d05eaf0e3d8f131%2Fyouth-tackle-football-2.jpg
Short-legged people hardest hit.
Short people have, no reason, short people have, no reason to live.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bfyS-S-IJs
I've met several triples over the years. They always seemed like 2 closeted gay males with 1 really ugly unfuckable female beard.
Hey Brian Cox, if you want to help someone in need, you could always pay off some random people’s debts.
Video on aljazeera (English) of 15 men stripped and summarily executed in a Gaza apartment. After which, the building is leveled with kids killed under the rubble.
Idk whether these folks were actual Hamas – or ‘everyone in Gaza is Hamas because no one is innocent’ – but executing clearly unarmed prisoners looks like a war crime and obliterating the evidence looks like the cover-up of a war crime.
Funded by you.
https://www.memri.org/reports/arab-journalists-al-jazeera-mouthpiece-terrorist-organizations
During the 2023 Israel-Hamas war, Al Jazeera was conducting an interview with a wounded Gazan resident, who blamed Hamas hiding amongst civilians for his wounds; Al Jazeera promptly ended the interview.
Al Jazeera has also been accused of pushing Hamas propaganda, repeatedly broadcasting statements by Hamas' military and political leaders calling for a broader uprising and aligning themselves closely with Hamas' preferred language for the conflict.
JFree doesn’t understand the concept of executing terrorists for their crimes. He ought to let go of his antisemitism.
.
Uhm… unless someone is forcing you to listen to their sordid tales or to read about their sexual freedom, then you do not “have to hear about it.” Just ignore the garbage, STFU, and move on.