Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Gun Rights

War With Russia Teaches Ukraine To Value Private Guns

Survey finds growing acceptance of civilian firearms among the country’s population.

J.D. Tuccille | 1.12.2024 7:00 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
A rifle sits atop a map of the country of Ukraine. | Illustration: Lex Villena; digitaltmuseum
(Illustration: Lex Villena; digitaltmuseum)

Nothing enhances your appreciation for firearms like needing one to defend your family and yourself. That's certainly the experience of Ukrainians, say researchers. Many residents of the war-torn country—men in particular, who traditionally carry the burden of fighting and military service—recently told interviewers that they either own firearms or want to acquire them.

You are reading The Rattler from J.D. Tuccille and Reason. Get more of J.D.'s commentary on government overreach and threats to everyday liberty.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Ukraine Needs Guns

"Crazy thought, but those 20 million AR-15s now in this country could sure arm a lot of Ukrainians," actor and gun-control advocate George Takei snarked a few months after Russian forces crossed the border into Ukraine. It wasn't his intention, but a lot of Ukrainians have come to agree with him.

"Between 43 and 46 per cent of men in every age group indicated that they either already own a firearm (7 per cent overall) or would like to own one," Gergely Hideg wrote last month for the Geneva, Switzerland-based Small Arms Survey. "Only 11 per cent of women expressed the desire to own a firearm."

That disparity in opinion would seem to indicate a clash between the sexes until you remember that, while the demands of resisting Russia's invasion have thrust women into new roles, Ukraine is a traditional society with corresponding expectations about gender. That relatively few women want to own guns doesn't mean they lack appreciation for their defensive power.

"Despite women not wanting a firearm for themselves and many thinking that it is not necessary to have one, firearm proficiency appears to be regarded as an expected skill for a husband," Hideg adds. "Nearly six in ten women interviewed believed that 'some' (38 per cent) or 'most' (19 per cent) wives in their area expect their husbands to be familiar with firearms and know how to use them."

Why would that be? Because for two years, Ukrainians have been fighting for their independence against Russian invaders, and you don't do that with harsh words. In their defense, Ukrainian officials lobbied allies for heavy equipment and handed small arms to their own people.

"Gun shops have sold out of some weapons, such as AR-10 and AR-15 assault rifles," The Guardian reported the day before war began.

"We will give weapons to anyone who wants to defend the country," President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced on February 24, 2022.

An Armed Society Is a Society Accustomed To Being Armed

Inevitably, common possession and use of rifles and pistols moved the needle on what Ukrainians expect. According to a 2022 poll, the share of the population supporting recognizing a right to civilian gun ownership increased from 23 percent the previous year to 58 percent. Also in that poll, 90 percent of respondents named "freedom" as a main value for their country.

"Firearm possession appears to be more normalized nowadays in Ukraine," Hideg commented in the December 2023 Small Arms Survey report. Reasons cited for owning firearms include hunting (53 percent of respondents), defense against criminals (21 percent) and "protection against potential enemies" (14 percent). Potential enemies from a neighboring country? That's a good guess.

The report's author also observed that survey respondents did not all appear to be truthfully answering questions about firearms possession and that the rate of ownership was probably higher than formal responses suggest.

That certainly reflects the experience in the United States. Last summer, researchers with Rutgers University's New Jersey Gun Violence Research Center concluded that many survey respondents claiming to not own firearms are lying and actually possess guns.

"It may be that a percentage of firearm owners are concerned that their information will be leaked and the government will take their firearms or that researchers who are from universities that are typically seen as liberal and anti-firearm access will paint firearm owners in a bad light," the authors allowed.

Civilian Guns Are Here To Stay

Citizens of a country where civilian gun ownership has historically been less widespread than in the United States may also be concerned about attempts at disarmament. Weapons distributed by the government are, theoretically, supposed to be returned when hostilities end. Don't count on it.

"Ukrainians are in no hurry to return their weapons," notes Hideg. "A plurality of Ukrainians (39 per cent) concur that soldiers will keep (at least some of) their firearms instead of returning them to the military after the war ends."

Of course, even assuming their records are in order, postwar officials will face challenges proving that weapons handed to civilians were not lost in combat. There's also the matter of battlefield pickups. That's in addition to the many firearms privately purchased before the war and likely to be supplemented afterwards by people increasingly comfortable with their possession.

Even if, contrary to their announced attention to ease gun laws, Ukrainian officials ultimately succumb to European pressure to tighten them, they'll face the usual uphill battle against their own people. Ukrainians are unlikely to be more willing than anybody else to surrender what they possess, or to submit to laws they've concluded are bad ideas. There's also the challenge posed by human innovation.

"Improvements in technology and information sharing have transformed PMFs [privately made firearms] from crude, impractical homemade devices of limited value to most criminals into highly functional weapons that are increasingly viewed as viable substitutes for factory-built firearms, including converted firearms, ghost guns, and 3D printed weapons," finds another December 2023 Small Arms Survey report.

The European Union also reportedly has a thriving market for "illicit firearms ammunition and other explosive munitions," according to a third publication.

So, Ukrainians who want to own firearms for a variety of reasons after the experience of the war with Russia are almost certain to have their desires satisfied. They'll end up armed through legal markets, the leavings of combat, or the growing and increasingly sophisticated European black market.

Challenge Accepted

If it's any consolation to opponents of private arms, Ukrainians have yet to catch up with Americans.

"More than half of American voters—52%—say they or someone in their household owns a gun," NBC News reported in November 2022. "That's the highest share of voters who say that they or someone in their household owns a gun in the history of the NBC News poll."

Almost half of Ukrainian men want to assume the responsibilities of being armed? That's a healthy start.

The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is for you.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Review: A Fitting End to Attack on Titan

J.D. Tuccille is a contributing editor at Reason.

Gun RightsWarGunsGun OwnersUkraineRussiaGun ControlFreedomSelf-DefenseDefense
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (62)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

    But I was told that if we armed then, they are more likely to kill themselves or someone in their home than an enemy!

    1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

      Nardz and Goldie have effectively been saying just that all this time as concern trolls for the Ukrainians being slaughtered by the Putin they love so much.

      As for me, I have loved the idea of armed Ukrainian civilians and think that if Zelenskyy demands the guns back after this war is over, then he is as evil as Putin and I hope the Ukrainian give back their weapons bullets first.

      1. HiramLynwood   1 year ago (edited)

        I get paid more than $120 to $130 every hour for working on the web. I found out about this Qd activity 3 months prior and subsequent to joining this I have earned effectively $15k from this without having internet working abilities Copy underneath site to..
        Check It—>>> http://Www.Smartcareer1.com

      2. Zeb   1 year ago

        Ukrainians have a right to self defense, and civilians being armed is good. That doesn't mean that the US funding and arming them so the war can drag on and on, with little hope of Ukrainian victory, is good for anyone. (Except the MIC and international arms dealers).

      3. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

        You don't have to "love the idea" of armed Ukrainian civilians to appreciate the practical advantages of that when their country is invaded by a foreign army.

        Obviously, they cannot take on the Red Army (not to be confused with the MAGA Army, btw) directly, but they may be able to affect the ultimate outcome of the war if the occupier cannot maintain cost-effective control of the area because of an armed resistance movement.

  2. Mickey Rat   1 year ago (edited)

    Scotland proposes deranged “conversion therapy” legislation:

    https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/scotland-considers-utterly-deranged-conversion-therapy-legislation/

    “The Scottish government is proposing legislation to ban so-called “conversion therapy,” which could imprison parents for up to seven years and/or fine them an unlimited amount should they oppose their child’s newly adopted “gender identity” or sexual practices.”

    “We have already seen LGBT activists broaden the definition of “conversion therapy” from forced experiments on and physical abuse of homosexuals in clinical settings (which is already illegal) to include any clinical practice that challenges the assumptions of LGBT ideology. Now, activists seek to expand “conversion therapy” to any setting in which there’s dissent to the official LGBT-sanctioned approach to gender and sexuality.

    One reason for this aggressive expansion is that “conversion therapy,” as previously understood, does not exist in modern-day Scotland. The proposal admits as much, stating that according to “those with lived experience,” the most common form of conversion practices in Scotland “is that of a series of ‘informal’ actions conducted over a period of time.”

    From the legislative proposal:

    We propose that a coercive course of behavior in the context of conversion practices will include acts that are:

    • violent, threatening or intimidating towards the victim • controlling of the victim’s day-to-day activities • manipulative or pressuring the victim to act in a particular way • frightening, humiliating, degrading or punishing of the victim

    As stated, violence and abuse are already illegal, while the rest — “pressuring,” “punishing,” and “controlling” — are easily conflated with ordinary parental decision-making and discipline, especially as they relate to the parents’ values and beliefs.”

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      [Obligatory statement about the one country with a cultural history of men wearing dresses]

      1. Chumby   1 year ago

        Their male attire is off kilter

        1. Johnathan Galt   1 year ago

          Pipe down!

      2. MK Ultra   1 year ago

        Hey Macleod, get off of my ewe.

        1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

          "Harold! Come back here Harold!"
          https://youtu.be/9TeiSsJ3G_0?si=2fyVh6mfY_a1Wkci
          🙂
          😉

        2. Elmer Fudd the CHUD 2: Steampunk Boogaloo   1 year ago (edited)

          “There can be only one!”

          -Gavin Macleod, as he beheads his enemies on that cruise ship he captained

      3. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

        Ackshuyally, young boys wore dresses as toddlers in the American Old West. It made for ease of changing diapers.

        1. Zeb   1 year ago

          And if kilts are dresses, then so are togas, robes, etc.

          1. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

            Kilts are dresses the way Dylan Mulvaney is a woman.

            1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

              Are skirts dresses?

  3. Adans smith   1 year ago (edited)

    They just need a double barrel shot , walkout side and fire in the air. That’ll scare those Russians away. Right Joe?

  4. Chumby   1 year ago

    Armed Ukrainian citizens, the ones that couldn’t manage to bribe their way out of the country to avoid conscription by the Bandera worshipping western puppet in Kiev, would have used them to fight against the conscription Einsatzgruppen grabbing young men and even boys off the streets to send them to front of the meatgrinder line in a failed attempt to subjugate folks that lean east.
    Incidentally, billions of dollars of weapons that the Biden regime bought with US taxpayer money sent to Ukraine cannot be accounted for. Perhaps these are undocumented freedom rods.

    Following the fall of the Soviet Union, Russia mostly sunset the former’s program of teaching school kids how to operate, field strip, and clean the Red Army’s Kalashnikov service rifle. They are reportedly now reinstituting some of that education.

    1. gaoxiaen   1 year ago

      Go post on Pravda, huylo vatnik troll!

    2. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      No kiddin. They're kinda running out of old people to draft.

  5. mad.casual   1 year ago

    That disparity in opinion would seem to indicate a clash between the sexes until you remember that, while the demands of resisting Russia's invasion have thrust women into new roles, Ukraine is a traditional society with corresponding expectations about gender. That relatively few women want to own guns doesn't mean they lack appreciation for their defensive power.

    Zoomers : X (formerly known as Twitter) :: Boomers : "Only 11 per cent of women expressed the desire to own a firearm." (the other 89% prefer their men to own one).

    We know.

  6. mad.casual   1 year ago (edited)

    *sight* Clearing out a bunch of straw men –

    “Gun shops have sold out of some weapons, such as AR-10 and AR-15 assault rifles,” The Guardian reported the day before war began.

    Wannabe gun nerd: Stupid British anti-2A propagandists! There is no such thing as an assault rifle!

    Actual gun nerd: Actually, the AR-10, chambered in a full power cartridge is a battle rifle, is a battle rifle, not an assault rifle. The AR-15, however, is actually an assault rifle ideologically aligned with the StG 44, just applied to a different war in a different era.

    Anglophile: They invented the language.

    American: And were allowed to continue using it instead of German by the grace of Garand, Browning, and Patton.

    Normal person who owns and uses guns: They’re British, just be glad they didn’t scald themselves making tea and then destroy the last remnants of their culture by trying to ban that.

    1. Scotterbee   1 year ago

      What is running through your mind as you type something like this out? That you're impressing your friends, or convincing some rando to be like you? Are you just wasting time, hoping for someone to engage your loneliness? Who exactly are you rambling to here? Idk. I read things like this and cringe at the person you may be.

      1. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

        So you engaged their loneliness, fulfilling their hope?

      2. Eeyore   1 year ago

        What if my AR-15 identifies as a woman?

      3. GroundTruth   1 year ago

        Sort of rough, aren't you? I thought it was humorous, and generally fairly close the the truth.

    2. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      "Assault rifles" have long existed.

      "Assault weapons" is the new, confused term invented by politicians.

  7. Was it something I said?   1 year ago

    I wonder if Takei realized what a self own that was?

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      No. American Leftists cannot self-reflect.

    2. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

      It's all about the narrative.

  8. Quo Usque Tandem   1 year ago

    20 million ARs is by all accounts a very conservative estimate; current ownership has been estimated to be as high as 44 million.

    Important to remember that while such weapons are vilified as often as possible, they account for a very small percentage of homicides, actually less than blunt objects, knives, and beating people to death. They are not even the most common weapon used in mass shootings.

    And the overwhelming vast majority of people who own them will never do anything bad with them. They aren't going anywhere, and perhaps the best plan would be to focus and the minority of persons who actually commit crimes.

    But should anyone want to stick to their ideals of what a great world it would be without guns yadda yadda, go ahead; you will just drive sales and pro second amendment advocacy and even more lawsuits filled by the likes of SAF, FPC, GOA, and NAGR [yes, the NRA is conspicuously absent from this list as their focus in recent years has been on the now defunct leader's legal problems and perks; we will see if they rise up from the ashes of their own making, but I doubt it and honestly we no longer need them].

    1. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

      "focus (on) the minority of persons who actually commit crimes."

      In the real world that IS the focus and law enforcement frequently convicts the actual perp and, if that fails, they convict the wrong person. If it were possible to predict which gun owners are actually at high risk of committing a crime with a gun then discussing prevention might be somewhat productive, but since it is impossible to predict that risk, it's just a narrative fantasy of the gun ban enthusiasts.

      1. Zeb   1 year ago

        It's pretty easy to correlate high risk of doing bad things with a gun based on gang membership or other involvement in organized or semi-organized crime. Pretty much all other gun crime is insignificant compared to that.

      2. Quo Usque Tandem   1 year ago

        I generally agree, but did you know that, nation wide, barley 1/2 of homicides [called "clearance rate"] are even prosecuted? In some places it is even worse than that:

        1. Flint, Mich.: 17.5%
        2. Honolulu, Hawaii: 18.8%
        3. Midland, Mich.: 23.1%
        4. Saginaw, Mich.: 23.3%
        5. Lima, Ohio: 24.5%
        6. Kokomo, Ind.: 30%
        7. Grand Rapids-Wyoming, Mich.: 30.9%
        8. New York-Newark-Jersey City, NY-NJ-Pa.: 31%
        9. Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Mich.: 31.8%
        10. Topeka, Kan.: 32.7%

        So yes, you can [and people often do] get away with murder.

        https://www.newser.com/story/244203/10-cities-with-worst-murder-clearance-rates.html

        1. MaverickNH   1 year ago

          Perhaps it’s the data we don’t have that proves AR-15s are the “weapon of choice” in homicides, as it is in a small fraction of mass shootings? I had alway thought “X of choice” was at least a plurality, if not a majority. Given that a 9mm handgun will merely blow a lung out, but an AR-15 will decapitate someone, how can a coroner miss the difference? Must be the mainstream media saying, ho-hum, another homicide with an AR-15 - no story there…

      3. mad.casual   1 year ago

        If it were possible to predict which gun owners are actually at high risk of committing a crime with a gun then discussing prevention might be somewhat productive,

        Nope. This runs into categorization errors/problems. That is, the answer to the question of prediction doesn't dictate the answer of the question of resolution and neither question is durably definitive of both questions and answers any more than the question "What color car is the fastest?" can be answered by "Red".

        Minority Report. Even if we had a method that was 98% effective at predicting a murder 30 min. in advance, we'd still have the question(s) of how do we know which are the 2% if we prevent 100% of them? What do we do with them? Who decides? Is that (too) racist?

        1. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

          If you could remove guns from 6% of the population, and stop at least 50% of violent crime in the country, would you?

          1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

            By legal means? Or by any means?

            It matters.

          2. mad.casual   1 year ago

            If you could stop at least 50% of the violent crime in this country by wishing 6% of the population out of existence, would you?

  9. PMBug   1 year ago

    Instruments of force are anathema until you need one. And when you need one, you don't want to wait on a counterparty (police, soldier, etc.) to wield it.

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   1 year ago

      Seconds count when your erstwhile rescuers are at least several minutes [or more] away. Add societal disruptions [as occurred in several localities during our most recent Summer of Love in 2020] and they may not show up at all.

      1. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

        Besides, federal law states clearly that all employees must remain in the donut shop until the end of their mandatory thirty minute break, and that they are not allowed to respond to any emergency during that time.

    2. gaoxiaen   1 year ago

      Especially when they're likely to shoot the wrong person.

  10. Skeebo   1 year ago

    There was an underground gun hoarding culture in the Ukraine before the war:

    https://www.gunfacts.info/blog/weapon-in-ukraine-lessons-in-law-and-reality/

    There is an old joke about people and guns here in the Ukraine.

    A man went outside and saw his neighbor showering a flowerbed using lubricating oil.

    “What are you doing, my friend?” he asked. “Your flowers will wilt!”

    “Sure,” his friend replied. “My flowers will wilt, but my machinegun will not rust!”

    1. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

      Thanks! That made my day.

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        Seems like something got lost in translation. It's not even really a joke.

        Ukrainian No. 1: Did you hear about the duel at the intersection downtown? One guy died!
        Ukrainian No. 2: It would be much more efficient if they put in a roundabout.

        1. GroundTruth   1 year ago

          Sounds like Boston.

  11. NOYB2   1 year ago

    File this under "too little too late".

    1. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

      Not at all! The Ukrainians successfully fought off and turned back an invasion by one of the most feared boogey man armies in the world. In the process they inadvertently revealed that army to be a paper tiger and Putin to be a megalomaniacal jackass.

      1. NOYB2   1 year ago

        It must be nice to live in a fantasy world like that, completely divorced from reality.

        1. mad.casual   1 year ago

          Imagine the megalomaniac you had to be to not be aware of Putin as a territorial megalomaniac until Putin invaded the Donbas... after Crimea.

          1. NOYB2   1 year ago

            Imagine the stupidity and ignorance necessary to mistake rational cost/benefit calculations and strategic motivations of an amoral, brutal foreign leader (one with the second largest nuclear arsenal) for "megalomania."

            The only "megalomania" I have see is by NATO leaders, who thought they could simply do whatever they damned well pleased without consequences.

      2. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

        If this were early 2023, I could take this comment seriously because I might say you were merely repeating the dogma as it appeared in the New York Times et. al.

        But now you're not even repeating the mainstream media, who quite some time ago admitted that Ukraine has some soul searching to do, lost its offensive, has lost most of its young generation of young men to the meatgrinder that the US got a bargain in supplying, and should begin negotiations with Russia sort of nowish.

        1. GroundTruth   1 year ago

          If the west had provided sufficient support about June of 2022 when it became clear that the Russians were not going to get beaten back, then autumn of 2022 might have seen the Russians pushed back to the border. But we held off too long, and now the Russians are very well dug in.

          But Biden and Blinken are weenies and apparently have bad advisors and no guts.

          1. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago

            They weren't just bad advisors with no guts, the actively subverted and derailed negotiations between Ukraine and Russia in Turkey in 2022. That's the opposite of ineffective, that's actively sabatoging.

            1. mad.casual   1 year ago

              "Don't Say Sabotage"

            2. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

              Presumably, you're referring to the negotiations in April 2022, and "the west's" intervention, led by its most eminent statesman, Alexander Boris de Pfeffel Johnson?

          2. NOYB2   1 year ago

            Ukraine was doomed even before the war with Russia due to its demographics.

            Furthermore, Russia's primary goal in attacking Ukraine was to eliminate it as a threat and eliminate it as a fossil fuel competitor. Russia could achieve its goals by turning all of Ukraine into glassy, radioactive, smoldering crater if that was the only option the West left it. The result of "more support" for Ukraine would have been more destruction of Ukraine: massive aerial bombardment or worse.

  12. Agammamon   1 year ago

    >War With Russia Teaches Ukraine To Value Private Guns

    That will only last until the war's over. Then the government will move in to put that genie back in the bottle.

    And you're not going to do a lot with the guns when basically every guy in the country under 60 is dead.

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      At this point, Martial Law preempting Presidential Elections in Ukraine seems to be the default setting.

      Even if they get out from under martial law, it gets into the sort of "social fabric election engineering" (a la mail in ballots during COVID pandemic) situation where any previous political parties have been dissolved/oppressed under martial law and would effectively have to reconstitute themselves in opposition to Zelensky.

  13. Diane Reynolds (Paul. they/them)   1 year ago (edited)

    “We will give weapons to anyone who wants to defend the country,” President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced on February 24, 2022.

    “And you will defend your country with those weapons, whether you want to or not,” President Vlodymyr Zelenskyy announced right before issuing an order for mandatory conscription for everyone in the country younger than 82.

  14. Big Ed's Landing   1 year ago

    I am reminded of the Japanese admiral who, at the start of World War II was asked if they should proceed beyond Hawaii and invade the United States. He immediately dismissed that idea, stating that the population was armed and they would encounter an American with a gun behind every tree.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

How Making GLP-1s Available Over the Counter Can Unlock Their Full Potential

Jeffrey A. Singer | From the June 2025 issue

Bob Menendez Does Not Deserve a Pardon

Billy Binion | 5.30.2025 5:25 PM

12-Year-Old Tennessee Boy Arrested for Instagram Post Says He Was Trying To Warn Students of a School Shooting

Autumn Billings | 5.30.2025 5:12 PM

Texas Ten Commandments Bill Is the Latest Example of Forcing Religious Texts In Public Schools

Emma Camp | 5.30.2025 3:46 PM

DOGE's Newly Listed 'Regulatory Savings' for Businesses Have Nothing to Do With Cutting Federal Spending

Jacob Sullum | 5.30.2025 3:30 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!