Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Donald Trump

They Can't Get Him

Plus: Milei, Melania, mice, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 12.21.2023 9:30 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Trump | Alex Wroblewski/UPI/Newscom
(Alex Wroblewski/UPI/Newscom)

Trump/Colorado reactions: "For as long as Donald J. Trump has dominated Republican politics, many Democrats have pined for a magical cure-all to rid them of his presence," wrote Reid J. Epstein for The New York Times, in an oddly self-aware piece that still manages to give airtime to an awful lot of clownish #Resistance types. Whether the Mueller investigation, the impeachments, or, now, the Colorado Supreme Court decision to throw him off the ballot, lefties have spent the better part of the last seven years attempting to manifest the end of former President Donald Trump. It has not worked.

Now, a hefty chunk of the mainstream media reaction to the Colorado decision has been…impressively aware of how flimsy the legal logic is, contra my expectations. That hasn't stopped some people from doubling down, though:

BREAKING -- California Lieutenant Governor Eleni Kounalakis calls on the CA Secretary of State to "explore every legal option to remove former President Donald Trump from California's 2024 presidential primary ballot." pic.twitter.com/S8OsJfB4iC

— Citizen Free Press (@CitizenFreePres) December 20, 2023

"Courts in six states have already dismissed parallel efforts to strike Trump from the ballot on 14th Amendment grounds," wrote Intelligencer's Ed Kilgore. "Bids to exclude him are still kicking around courts in 14 other states."

Nobody knows yet whether, when taken up by the Supreme Court, this ruling will be smacked down. But it is at least heartening to see some level of collective awareness that these are not the means by which Trump should lose; a regular old election is the way we tend to handle this, and for good reason.

"I am disturbed about the potential chaos wrought by an imprudent, unconstitutional, and standardless system in which each state gets to adjudicate Section Three disqualification cases on an ad hoc basis," wrote Colorado Supreme Court Justice Carlos Samour Jr. in his dissent. "Surely, this enlargement of state power is antithetical to the framers' intent."

"To deny the voters the chance to elect the candidate of their choice is a Rubicon-crossing event for the judiciary," wrote New York magazine's Jonathan Chait. "It would be seen forever by tens of millions of Americans as a negation of democracy."

Situation dire in Gaza: Aid workers report that nearly all households in Gaza are out of food and water. Roughly 85 percent of the total 2.2 million population has been displaced; of that group, 96 percent report adults skipping meals so kids can eat or eating scavenged meats that they would not normally consume. Some 13 percent report burning garbage to cook, while roughly 15 percent of displaced people cannot heat their food at all, per a World Food Programme study conducted during the first two weeks of December. The percentage of Gazans experiencing "severe hunger" as defined by international aid organizations has risen drastically over the last two or so weeks.

"We categorically reject the despicable and libelous allegations that Israeli is somehow obstructing the delivery of humanitarian aid into Gaza," said Israeli government spokesman Eylon Levy on Wednesday. "If they want more food and water to reach Gaza, they should send more food and water to Gaza. And while they're sending more aid, they should condemn Hamas for hijacking aid deliveries and diverting them to its fighters. Their silence is shameful. We will not accept international officials deflecting blame onto us to cover up the fact they're covering up for Hamas."

Israeli success: Meanwhile, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) report that they have found massive networks of Hamas tunnels throughout their ground operation including, yesterday, a "center of power for Hamas' military and political wings," under Palestine Square—in the center of Gaza City—which "was located in the direct vicinity of commercial stores, government buildings, civilian residences, and a designated school for deaf children," per statements from the Israeli military.


Scenes from New York: A wholesome tale of carolers serenading cattle, which became a whole upstate tradition. Merry Christmas!


QUICK HITS

  • How sanctions have altered the borderlands between China and Russia.
  • Lots of promising Javier Milei actions coming out of Argentina:

Milei just delivered a message where he condemned collectivism (called it by its name) for a few minutes, explained that leftism has failed catastrophically everywhere, said Argentina needs more freedom not controls, and proceeded to name 30 key deregulations— from tourism to…

— agustina vergara cid (@agustinavcid) December 21, 2023

  • Claudine Gay is nothing if not committed to the bit. Meanwhile, The New York Times portrayed this as "Harvard finds more instances of 'duplicative language' in president's work," which is, uh, a little more generous than I'd be:

Uh Claudine Gay appears to have copied a couple phrases in her dissertation dedication from someone else's dedication? This takes… effort. https://t.co/SHOVeIsEKh pic.twitter.com/BdXywSwcTE

— Patrick Brennan (@ptbrennan11) December 19, 2023

  • "The world is full of creatures that age in ways humans might consider aspirational, including bowhead whales that enjoy a cancer-free life that can span two centuries and jellyfish that respond to stress by becoming polyps again.…Mice are not like that; they're like us," reported Bloomberg in a piece on what lab rats can teach us about our own longevity.
  • Is the chatbot Grok…actually good?
  • "A federal appeals court on Tuesday issued a temporary order limiting the Biden administration's authority to remove barbed wire erected by Texas along the U.S.-Mexico border as part of the state's effort to deter migrants from crossing into the United States," reported The New York Times.
  • Nobody knows what exactly this means, or why Trump antagonists are so obsessed with our sweet, long-suffering Slovenian:

A plane with a sign that says "MELANIA KNOWS" flying near Trump's rally site in Waterloo, IA. pic.twitter.com/hsilppWIIR

— Olivia Rinaldi (@olivialarinaldi) December 19, 2023

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Substackers Battle Over Banning Nazis

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

Donald TrumpElection 2024ElectionsColoradoCourtsMelania TrumpHarvardArtificial IntelligencePoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (607)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Nardz   1 year ago

    https://twitter.com/redsteeze/status/1737675304179581316?t=AUR2p_DvG1WNqUBxifW8eA&s=19

    This is an actual post from the sitting president of the United States account
    [Link]

    Journalists, media, fact checkers are all absent as to what this kind of post could actually mean to democracy. They agree with this, and this is fucking dangerous beyond belief.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      They must see trump as someone with superpowers.

      1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

        They are afraid of Trump's supporters. They think if they get rid of Trump, (by any means necessary), they get rid of his followers.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Well, they have already been working to get rid of their votes.

        2. B G   1 year ago

          It's been more than a decade since a US Presidential election result included one candidate who had a majority their votes come from supporters rather than from people "voting against the opponent".

          They might be thinking that if they can get the name off the ballot then his supporters will just stay home and disenfranchise themselves, like so many leftist voters do before spending 4 years whingeing about "voter suppression". Maybe they're right, but if RFK runs, a lot of trump's supporters from 2020 might actually go over to Kennedy anyway since trump was never actually on board with resisting the covid shots; one true thing which most FNC viewers actually know to be true while the whole of the CNN air staff pretends otherwise.

        3. HillTown Trader   1 year ago

          Which is about half the nation. Not so easy to cleanse away so many

          1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

            If a third is "about half", yes.

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        They see him as a demiurge, an evil god.

        1. Ska   1 year ago

          So my BG3 Dark Urge run should be a riff on MAGA?

          1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

            Would be a fun play through. Make a human oath breaker paladin that looks as close to trump as possible. Make every decision based on what he would do. Make Lae'zel Ivanka. Put it on youtube titled "Can you beat bg3 as Trump?"

            1. Ska   1 year ago

              Dying - that would be incredible. Maybe Minthara as Ivanka. I don't see Lae'zel as Trump's type (though the attitude could work).

              1. Chumby   1 year ago

                Shadowheart Stormy Daniels mod?

      3. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

        Oooh, Supertrump! I love that band!

      4. B G   1 year ago

        They see him the same way they saw Reagan, and Bush, and Dole, and "W", and McCain, and Romney (until those last two openly opposed trump, at which point they became Statesmen of historic caliber). trump is the "worst person who could ever seek elected office in the history of human civilization", only to be exceeded by whoever the next nominee for the Presidency to not be endorsed by the DNC turns out to be.

        I actually know (and in many areas very much respect the intellect of) at least 5-6 people who, during the 2016 primaries, said that trump was the worst possible nominee that could possibly end up on the ballot, and that Rubio, Cruz, and at least 4 of the other GOP contenders would all somehow be worse.

        After seeing the backlash against Elon Musk when he publicly turned his back on the Dem Party, I almost wonder if some of the animosity toward trump might be rooted in the knowledge that he was a Democrat for pretty much all of his life (many of his relatives reportedly forgot to change their registration to the GOP and were unable to vote for him in their states' 2016 primaries), and a significant donor to that party; at least enough to be mentioned by name and/or offered cameos in any number of theatre and film projects, especially those set in NYC. They didn't much care that he was a raging narcissist when they considered him to be "their" raging narcissist (one of the many, likely on a level with HRC and Pelosi) and they were happy to watch/help him work to establish his own name as synonymous with wealth, success, and opulence for 30+ years until he took up Hillary's "birther" lunacy after St Barack was officially anointed.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      To save democracy, we must kill democracy.

      1. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

        or "Look what you made me do."

        1. Quo Usque Tandem   1 year ago

          It's for you own good, or this is going to hurt me more than it hurts you comes to mind.

        2. VULGAR MADMAN   1 year ago

          “I love democracy.”

          -Palpatine

      2. Moonrocks   1 year ago

        Democracy is too important to be left up to the voters.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          This guy gets it.

      3. HillTown Trader   1 year ago

        Muduro of Venezuela and cronies have banned Venezuela opposition presidential candidate Maria Corina Machado from running for office in 2024. Debbie Wassermann Schultz is called for sanctions against VZ for election interference --- Oh the Irony

        1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

          You appear to think the US is equivalent to Venezuela in terms of rule of law. I've read similar wrt Russia. Okey dokey...

    3. Reshufflex   1 year ago

      Just a softer, latent version of Krylenko:

      “In the period of dictatorship, surrounded on all sides by enemies, we sometimes manifested unnecessary leniency and unnecessary softheartedness."

    4. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Here's the post by President Dipshit.

      https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1737630463236178175

      Trump poses many threats to our country: The right to choose, civil rights, voting rights, and America’s standing in the world.

      But the greatest threat he poses is to our democracy.

      If we lose that, we lose everything.

      Remember, this is a post, on Twitter, by a sitting President. Given how they project, it appears the Democrats want to terminate any semblance of democracy we have left.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        But the greatest threat he poses is to our democracy.

        But it’s cool if judges take people off the ballot, limited choices is democracy!

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          And it isnt even trump. They are now advocating removing anybody but Biden or the DNC candidate. They are openly calling for barring No Labels.

          https://www.semafor.com/article/12/19/2023/the-plot-against-no-labels

          It isnt stopping with Trump.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            From the article:

            A coalition of Democratic and Republican anti-Trump groups are organizing an aggressive, multi-front campaign to stop the independent group No Labels from injecting a third major candidate in the upcoming 2024 election.

            Their plans, laid out in a private, roughly 80-minute call obtained by Semafor, include legal attacks, opposition research and warnings to potential candidates and donors that involvement with No Labels could make them politically toxic.

            The call, organized by the center-left Democratic group Third Way with the help of the progressive Move On, also included representatives of End Citizens United, the Lincoln Project, American Bridge, Public Citizen, and Reproductive Freedom for All. Attendees included prominent anti-Trump Republicans Sarah Longwell and Bill Kristol, former Democratic Sen. Doug Jones, and an aide to the Democratic billionaire Reid Hoffman, Dmitri Mehlhorn.

            “Through every channel we have, to their donors, their friends, the press, everyone — everyone — should send the message: If you have one fingernail clipping of a skeleton in your closet, we will find it,” one speaker said during the call. “If you think you were vetted when you ran for governor, you’re insane. That was nothing. We are going to come at you with every gun we can possibly find. We did not do that with Jill Stein or Gary Johnson, we should have, and we will not make that mistake again.”

            The coalition also laid out a strategy to attack No Labels in the courts. A representative of End Citizens United said the group is planning to file an IRS complaint against No Labels, with one goal being to force No Labels to disclose its donors — something the person said would be “a huge hit to their entire operation.”

            “What we want to do with donors is continue to build the idea in the minds of the political elites and the people that they talk to that this is a road to nowhere, that if you get involved with this, you are throwing, you’re really risking your entire reputation and your legacy,” Bennett said during the private meeting. “It’s a very, very bad investment.”

            They want a one party (D)emocracy.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

              Do they want actual civil war? Because this is how you get civil war.

              1. mad.casual   1 year ago

                IDK, what's the critical distinction between a Civil War and something like the French Revolution?

                "Civil War" invokes 'armies on both sides' and 'brother-against-brother'. This is beginning to look more and more like Gavin Newsome, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and the most devoted 10% of their constituency trying to defend themselves, unarmed, getting their heads lopped off by 50% of the population, and the other 40% standing around with their hands up going "Yeah, those guys were *idiots*! I can't believe I was dumb enough reluctantly vote for them!"

                1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

                  There absolute mutely was civil war happening in the French Revolution. Napoleon earned command of the army of Italy after putting down an armed mob threatening to overthrow the Dieectory. There was entire army in Brittany fighting an army of Royalists.

                  1. mad.casual   1 year ago

                    Yeah, maybe I should've been clearer about the conception of the French Revolution, but the point, I think, still stands. At what point is it a Civil War vs. a majority of patriotic Americans just watering the tree of liberty?

                2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

                  I hope ours ends sooner and with fewer own goals than that one did.

            2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

              This is regime in-fighting, not some outsider threat. No Labels was always a psyop meant to keep establishment Republicans pliable as controlled opposition.

              Some of them are forgetting their purpose and becoming more ambitious than what they were established for. I suspect Liz Cheney is probably working behind the scenes, given she's doing a book tour and allowing the press to flatter her as a third-party candidate, to become the group's nominee.

              Remember that when you hit the target on leftists, they begin absolutely shrieking like wounded animals. The fact the Democrat groups are freaking out about this in particular shows that a third-party run would be a lot more likely to split Democratic votes than Republican ones.

              1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                The problem is polling shows No Labels as a threat to the DNC, not to Trump. Which is why they are focused now on shutting it down.

              2. Longtobefree   1 year ago

                Who is seriously worried about a "party" with no platform and no candidates?

                1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                  A party with a dementia-addled zombie as its titular figurehead, whose handlers are threatening to put Literally Hitler in office due to their incompetence.

          2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

            Didn't DNC sue to get Greens off the ballot in many states in the last election?

            1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

              Yep, and it wasn't a lot of them--the targets were swing states where the Greens could tip the balance over to Trump. I've seen arguments from progressives that this was, in fact, what ultimately won Biden those swing state votes.

            2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              Yes, 2022:

              https://apnews.com/article/2022-midterm-elections-lawsuits-voting-north-carolina-raleigh-48f1e61c1988c7083edcdc7bb1eace4a

              North Carolina Democrats, accused by the Green Party of meddling in its petitioning process to qualify candidates for the November ballot, have asked a state court to overturn a unanimous elections board vote granting the Green Party official recognition despite allegations of fraud.

              The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Wake County Superior Court, precedes the first hearing next Monday in a Green Party lawsuit against the North Carolina State Board of Elections, when the newly certified party will fight for an extension to a statutory deadline preventing its candidates from appearing on the ballot.

          3. R Mac   1 year ago

            If only there was a word that described political parties that once they gain control tend to take rival political parties off ballots.

            Maybe we should ask sarc?

        2. Zeb   1 year ago

          Democracy means doing as you are told and voting for an acceptable, properly vetted candidate.

        3. But SkyNet is a Private Company   1 year ago

          Stalin, Saddam Hussein, Idi Amin, Mao, Biden, and Putin all agree- the opposition must be barred from the ballot, arrested, and their property seized and redistributed

          1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

            After a very legitimate trial presided over by a Party loyalist who has decided the outcome beforehand and what facts will be allowed presentation.

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              So just like Letitia James and her judge Arthur Engoron.

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        "B-b-b-but Trump called illegal immigration "poisonous" which if we force it sounds kind-of-sort-of-like the translation of a phrase Hitler used, so we have to behave like fascists"
        ~ Jeff and friends yesterday.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Sarc is denying yesterday in the earlier thread. It is fucking amazing to watch.

          1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            Republican lawmakers turn on Trump for saying migrants are 'poisoning the blood' of our country and quoting Putin

            Yet Jesse cannot attack Republicans for saying this. No, he attacks me.

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Jesse attacks the GOPe constantly. What are you talking about?

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                He’s lying.

          2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12881811/Republican-lawmakers-turn-Trump-saying-migrants-poisoning-blood-country-quoting-Putin.html

            Here's the link.

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              Zero surprises that the GOPe isn't above using DNC talking points for a common enemy.

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                There’s no republican even quoted using any of that language. Sarc didn’t read his link.

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  This. Narratives over evidence.

                  1. Chumby   1 year ago

                    Maybe sarcasm or Tulpa hacked his account again.

            2. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

              The Attack of the Powder Puffs
              Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said, 'I think it's unhelpful rhetoric,' according to a Hill report. And fellow Senate GOP leadership member Sen. Shelley Moore Capito said she 'obviously' doesn't agree with his language.
              There's also this
              While Senate Republican Whip John Thune (R-Ky.) says Trump's rhetoric crossed the line, he still thinks Biden has failed to do anything to adequately address surging illegal immigration.
              On the other end, Sen. Lindsey Graham said on Sunday that he doesn't care what sort of language Trump uses because his policies were more effective than Biden's in quelling the southern border crisis.

          3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

            I posted there yesterday that Biden once used a turn-of-phrase that echoed one Hitler used...

            "We've been patient, but our patience is wearing thin," Biden said.

            ‘I cannot go back behind the limits set to our patience...My Patience Is Now At An End’ Adolf Hitler’s Speech To The Reichstage, Berlin.

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              Obviously by sarcs standard Hitler is also Bidens spirit animal. And you didnt even have to add words to change the quote unlike sarc did with Trump.

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                Republicans are disgusted with Donald Trump’s recent rally comments where he invoked language used by Adolf Hitler, quoted Russian President Vladimir Putin and sprinkled praises on other authoritarian leaders.

                What's the response? Biden once said blah blah blah so that makes it ok. Pathetic.

                1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

                  That is exactly the point.

                  1. R Mac   1 year ago

                    Sarc revels in hypocrisy.

                    1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

                      It is not hypocrisy; it is hierarchy

                    2. Sevo   1 year ago

                      Abysmal stupidity will suffice.

                    3. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                      And a serious lack of self-awareness.

                    4. VULGAR MADMAN   1 year ago

                      Hypocrisy is sarc’s kink.

            2. R Mac   1 year ago

              What did sarc say about this comment?

              1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                Where is your outrage at Republicans for calling out Trump?

                1. R Mac   1 year ago

                  “Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said, 'I think it's unhelpful rhetoric,' according to a Hill report. And fellow Senate GOP leadership member Sen. Shelley Moore Capito said she 'obviously' doesn't agree with his language.”

                  Hmmm….

                  “The words appear to be borrowed from Adolf Hitler's 1925 manifesto Mein Kampf, where the German dictator wrote: 'All great cultures of the past perished only because the originally creative race died out from blood poisoning.'”

                  The second quote is from the Daily Mail, not republicans. Not sure what I should be outraged about from the first quotes.

                  Now answer my question about the direct quote from Biden.

                  1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    I think the quote you reference is not comparable in the slightest because it's not intended to incite hatred, while Trump's was.

                    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                      You know damn well that falsely comparing Trump calling mass illegal immigration "poisonous" (which it totally fucking is) with an unrelated Hitler quote about race is far more "hate" inciting against the deplorable bitter clingers than anything Trump said.

                    2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Take that up with the Republicans who expressed disgust.

                    3. R Mac   1 year ago

                      sarcasmic 48 mins ago
                      Flag Comment Mute User
                      Republican lawmakers turn on Trump for saying migrants are ‘poisoning the blood’ of our country and quoting Putin

                      Yet Jesse cannot attack Republicans for saying this. No, he attacks me.

                      Your claim is about what Republicans said about it. Now you move the goalpost.

                      And as someone who’s unvaccinated it’s pretty clear that Biden’s statement was intended to incite hatred. Along with dozens of other statements made about me at the time. But thanks for admitting you’re ok with what Biden said.

                    4. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Your claim is about what Republicans said about it. Now you move the goalpost.

                      I'm moving the goalposts? Dude, I'm quoting a stupid article, not expressing an opinion. If there is to be any outrage, it should be directed at Republicans or the Daily Mail.

                    5. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      What does the Biden quote have to do with anything other than being a distraction or an excuse? Some Democrat did it first so it's ok hurr durr.

                    6. R Mac   1 year ago

                      Hahaha, you didn’t actually read the whole article!

                      And I’ll still note you’re ok with Biden’s incitement of hate for the unvaccinated. But that’s ok sarc, I really don’t care who hates me. I’m actually proud I stood tall while the government, the corporate press, and a lot of other people tried to dehumanize me.

                    7. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      Asking me about a quote and ambushing me with the context later is not an honest way to argue.

                    8. R Mac   1 year ago

                      Holy shit sarc, IT WAS IN YOUR LINK!

                  2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                    Trump said (paraphrased) millions of illegals are poisoning the blood of the country, and we've got a lot of work to do.

                    What does "a lot of work" mean to you? To me it means that not enough work is being done right now. So what does more work look like? If it's done by government it means rounding people up like cattle, if it's not then it means government condoned vigilantism. Either way it doesn't spell freedom.

                    1. R Mac   1 year ago

                      He’s quite clear about what work he’s talking about. He spent four years as president trying to get it accomplished.

                      This stupidity would be more persuasive if Trump hadn’t already been president.

                    2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      What he tried to accomplish was a wall. What he's talking about now is people already in the country.

                    3. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                      Here is sarc explaining what trump didn’t say.

                    4. DesigNate   1 year ago

                      The reason this is such a hard sell to people is because Trump is famous for dating and fucking hot immigrant women. He's even made kids with them. So the idea he was in any way referring to blood in the same way Hitler was just rings false as hell.

        2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          You mean Republicans.

          Republicans are disgusted with Donald Trump's recent rally comments where he invoked language used by Adolf Hitler, quoted Russian President Vladimir Putin and sprinkled praises on other authoritarian leaders.

          https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12881811/Republican-lawmakers-turn-Trump-saying-migrants-poisoning-blood-country-quoting-Putin.html

          1. R Mac   1 year ago

            You should go ahead and read your entire link.

            'Donald Trump channeled his role models as he parroted Adolf Hitler, praised Kim Jong Un, and quoted Vladimir Putin while running for president on a promise to rule as a dictator and threaten American democracy,'

            That’s the only quoted statement from anyone that compared Trump to Hitler. Did you notice who that quote was from?

            Seriously, why can’t leftists read their own links? It’s like a constant.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              I assume that means you're outraged at the Republicans who said it.

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                Lmao, you glorious moron. I even warned you you should read your whole link, and you were still too stupid to do it:

                “'Donald Trump channeled his role models as he parroted Adolf Hitler, praised Kim Jong Un, and quoted Vladimir Putin while running for president on a promise to rule as a dictator and threaten American democracy,' a spokesperson for Biden's reelection campaign said.”

                LMAO, IT WAS A BIDEN SPOKESMAN THAT SAID IT!!! Embarrassing.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  So you're defending Trump saying there's a lot of work to do to fix the problem of millions of illegals poisoning the blood of the country, and your defense is Biden said something, the wall will round up people already in the country, and I didn't read the entire article. Sure dude. Whatever.

                  1. R Mac   1 year ago

                    You got caught. Keep spinning.

                    1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                      You must be really proud of yourself. You get three attaboys and a pat on the back.

                    2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

                      I thought you said you didn’t care what rmac had to say.

                    3. R Mac   1 year ago

                      You really have no shame. You got caught blaming republicans for something a biden spokesman said and tried to get everyone to denounce republicans for it.

                      Because you couldn’t be bothered to read your link that you posted repeatedly. You’re so broken you’re as bad as buttplug now.

                    4. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

                      Day 12,305: Sarc is still a dishonest, disingenuous idiot. Otherwise sane people continue interacting with him anyway. No explanation has been found for this irrational behavior.

                      The observation will continue.

                    5. R Mac   1 year ago

                      Making sarc look stupid is fun, and easy.

                    6. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

                      Nobody needs to do anything to make him look stupid, that's all him. But I don't understand the entertainment value of mocking the retarded.

                    7. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                      Nobody needs to do anything to make him look stupid, that’s all him. But I don’t understand the entertainment value of mocking the retarded.

                      Although, it is funny watching him get into a circle jerk with Jeffy. I'm surprised he can even find fatfuck's.

                  2. Ersatz   1 year ago

                    So you’re defending Trump saying there’s a lot of ....

                    sarcasmic 4 hours ago>
                    Your claim is about what Republicans said about it. Now you move the goalpost.
                    I’m moving the goalposts?

                    Why yes, yes you are.

      3. A Cynical Asshole   1 year ago

        "We must abandon democracy in order to save democracy." - shitheads

        Also, I'll just point out again that whenever they use the phrase "our democracy" they don't actually mean democracy, they mean "democracy" where their side is guaranteed to win.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          Democracy means rule by Democrats.

        2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

          East Germany was a 'Democracy' so is North Korea and even Iran claims to be, hell even the Soviets claimed to be. Those are the templates that the Democrats are now using.

          1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            A one party system with predetermined outcomes can be a democracy if at least some of the people are allowed to pretend to vote.

      4. JesseAz   1 year ago

        It is amazing. And yet we have "one true libertarians" here defending the destruction of democracy and the country on the same belief of Trump being an existence trial threat. Ignoring the state use against his supporters. Ignoring the lawfare. And not just ignoring it, cheering it on and joining in with any form of condemnation they can to justify it such as with comparing trump to Hitler.

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          Every police report I've read of something I witnessed was boilerplate lies and fiction. Just like your posts. You missed your calling. Should have gone into law enforcement. You'd have fit in great.

          1. R Mac   1 year ago

            How many police reports have you read about something you’ve witnessed?

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              More than I'd like to admit. By the way, where's your outrage at Republicans for being disgusted at Trump invoking Hitler and quoting Putin?

              1. VinniUSMC   1 year ago

                Why would you be ashamed to admit? Because you're lying through your teeth?

              2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                He didn't quote Hitler. That's a flat out lie from the DNC. Stop portending it's not and repeating their propaganda.

                Also, what's wrong with quoting Putin?

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  I don't know. Ask the Republicans.

                  1. R Mac   1 year ago

                    Hahaha, keep doubling down on the ignorance from YOUR link:

                    “’Donald Trump channeled his role models as he parroted Adolf Hitler, praised Kim Jong Un, and quoted Vladimir Putin while running for president on a promise to rule as a dictator and threaten American democracy,’ a spokesperson for Biden’s reelection campaign said.”

                  2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    GOPe or MAGA?

                  3. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    And what you're attributing to the Republicans was actually said by Biden's rep.

      5. Longtobefree   1 year ago

        So true:
        https://democrats.org/where-we-stand/party-platform/

      6. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

        Of course president shithead didn't write that but what they really mean is
        "But the greatest threat he poses is to our democrat-zy.

      7. John C. Randolph   1 year ago

        Joe is a vegetable. That was posted by his puppeteers.

        -jcr

        1. Chumby   1 year ago

          In every public appearance, he looks beet.

    5. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      Sounds like a lot of covfefe.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        How so?

      2. Sevo   1 year ago

        turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
        If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
        turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

      3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Biden Promises to Spend 'Billion 300 Million Trillion 300 Million Dollars' On Infrastructure

      4. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Every one makes typos on a phone keyboard. Everyone makes silly gaffes...

        "... it is just wonderful to be back in Oregon, and over the last 15 months we've traveled to every corner of the United States. I've now been in fifty .... seven states? I think one left to go. One left to go. Alaska and Hawaii, I was not allowed to go to even though I really wanted to visit but my staff would not justify it."

        Do I think Obama REALLY thought there were 60 states?
        (60 = 57 he's "been in", +1 he has "left to go", +2 (Alaska, Hawaii; "not allowed to go to"), no. I think he knows that there are only 50 states and misspoke in a humorous error.

        OTOHO, despite the fact that covfefe was pretty clearly a keyboard typo for "coverage". Trump haters seem to actually think he thinks it's a word or something.

        1. DesigNate   1 year ago

          Trump is simultaneously an evil super genius hell bent on destroying the world and also a complete moron.

          1. See Double You   1 year ago

            Just like the Bush the Lesser was 20 years ago.

        2. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

          And no, Trump doesn't really think there were airports at the time of the Revolutionary War. What makes it funny, of course, is that he's constantly claiming that Biden's similar gaffes make Biden unsuitable for the presidency. His own? Not so much.

    6. Mickey Rat   1 year ago

      At some point, the argument will be made that running for office on anything but as a member of the Democratic Party is a danger to "our democracy".

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Already happening. See links to remove No Labels in the link above.

        Reason ignored the 2020 actions to remove the Green Party from many ballots. Sat quietly by as the dems started their plan.

    7. sarcasmic   1 year ago

      What's the point of having elections if people only accept the outcome that they want?

      Nah, we should be like a third world shithole and have a revolution every four years.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        Go tell that to the Democrats pulling this bullshit, Sarc. They're the assholes turning this into a banana republic. They're the assholes who believe in destroying democracy to save democracy. They're the assholes who will stop at nothing, and stomp on all laws and the Constitution itself just to get at that one person.

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          Don't worry. I'm sure Trump will get revenge once elected.

          1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

            They'll kill him first because they know there fucked if he wins. Even if, unlike them, he sticks with the law and the constitution.
            They went way too far and broke way too many laws to give up now.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              Dude, stop listening to overnight radio. Those guys are nuts.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                How about you check your TDS first, dude. Wake up and smell the bullshit the DNC is shoveling and has been documented here many times over for your enjoyment.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  I don't buy into conspiracy theories until there's facts to back them up, meaning they're no longer conspiracy theories. Sometimes they turn out to be true, and those are what people remember. Nobody's going to brag about predicting Trump getting killed first while he sits in the Oval Office.

                  1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

                    Would you have predicted the FBI and intelligence agencies would use their resources to lend the illusion of credibility to a hoax created by the Cunt®™ (legally known as Hillary Rodham Clinton)?

                    1. R Mac   1 year ago

                      Sarc needs facts before he’ll believe any conspiracies. He also keeps himself intentionally ignorant of all facts that go against left wing narratives.

                  2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

                    "I don’t buy into conspiracy theories until there’s facts to back them up"

                    You bought into "Trump was a Russian Agent", "January 6 is an insurrection", "Censorship on Twitter and Facebook wasn't mandated by the government", "Brian Sicknick was killed by a fire extinguisher", "The Biden laptop was Russian disinformation" and dozens of other conspiracy theories without facts to back them up.
                    What changed?

                    1. DesigNate   1 year ago

                      I think you know the answer to that...

        2. JesseAz   1 year ago

          But he agrees with their actions because he hates a man. State abuses are fine in that situation. I mean it is far less authoritarian than residency laws every country uses.

          1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

            It's no wonder you don't think anyone should be taken to court for defamation.

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        What's the point of having elections if Democrats openly tell us they are justified in taking illegal measures to attain their preferred outcome?

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          What's the point of having elections if Trump's Deranged Supporters (TDS) won't accept the outcome despite having every alleged case of fraud thrown out of court?

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            What's the point of western countries being in their present constructions? If one side has spent the last generation deeming ANY loss of their party as illegitimate, and the other side decides to start playing that game because that's the rule now, then wouldn't it be far better for those entities to simply not co-exist anymore?

            A couple that stays in a shitty marriage isn't doing the kids or their own well-being any favor; it shouldn't be any different for societies. In fact, in intensely democratic societies, as Native American tribes practiced, social ruptures are quite common, and the aggrieved group either went to other clans that were more amenable, or left to start their own clan. No one forced them to stick around, and it shouldn't be any different with western societies as a whole.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              On thing that has been unique about this country is the peaceful transfer of power.

              Thanks to Trump and his Deranged Supporters (TDS) those days are over.

              1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                Watching a color revolution in action through most of the election year that was coordinated by the establishment, as Time Magazine documented, will have that effect.

                1. R Mac   1 year ago

                  Sarc’s too stupid to understand what you just said.

              2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                All the bullshit going on in Ukraine right now could have been mitigated if we hadn't played those same stupid reindeer games there starting in 2004.

              3. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

                How was the FBI and intelligence agencies using their powers to give the illusion of credibility to a hoax invented by the Cunt®™ (legally known as Hillary Rodham Clinton) a peaceful transition of power?

                https://ethicsalarms.com/2022/05/22/its-confirmation-bias-stupid/

                It was confirmation bias. It’s really as simple as that. Even though the lawyers and agents involved in the investigation could not find the smoking gun evidence they were sure was there somewhere showing that Donald Trump and his odious minions conspired with America’s enemies to steal the 2016 election from its rightful winner, Hillary Clinton, they were absolutely certain that’s what happened, and still probably believe that’s what happened. They believed it fervently before the investigation ever began, and it poisoned the objectivity and the legitimacy of their work throughout.

                Every aspect of Trump’s Presidency was poisoned by confirmation bias—from the news media, from academics, from the Washington D.C. culture, from the popular culture—stretching back before he was nominated. He was a bad guy, that’s all, and everything he did or said was filtered through that jaundiced perception. It is impossible for anyone to succeed in any job, and definitely not the hardest job in the civilized world, burdened with that handicap.

                People–smart people, learned people, well-intentioned people— would not accept that the man wasn’t seeking the Presidency as part of some kind of sinister plan to enrich himself and his family, nor that he brought any useful skills to the job, nor that he could have possibly won (and the fact that it was “only” an Electoral College victory was seen as proof of that, though it was not).

                1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

                  Man, he doesn't read his own links. He's certainly not going to read yours.

                  1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                    That means Sarc is now on-par with the Pedo. Pluggo doesn't read his own links either.

              4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

                I guess the Democratic shenanigans that started in 2016 were peaceful, but they certainly were intended to prevent any transfer of power.

                1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

                  https://ethicsalarms.com/2023/05/17/assorted-ethics-observations-on-the-durham-report-part-ii-the-substance/

                  "…one of the biggest takeaways is what a destructive, vicious, damaging person Hillary Clinton is to our political process. This Russia collusion thing didn’t only damage Trump. He won the 2016 election anyway, despite this, think how big a victory he might have had without it. But it really froze and paralyzed the country politically for over four years. The damage Hillary Clinton’s campaign did was so tremendous to this nation. I think that to some extent, while it’s being highlighted by a lot of the news coverage, they’re not really doing it personal to Hillary and it to be, she really is possibly the most destructive politician we’ve certainly had in this century, in recent memory. The manipulation that she perpetrated here is so horrible, not for what it did to Donald Trump, that’s bad enough, but what it did to our nation. We’re at each other’s throats because of what Hillary Clinton did. And she needs to be roundly condemned, and she’s not getting a fraction of the criticism that she deserves ….So I think the damage that’s been done is long lasting it tears at the fabric of our society. And it was caused by Hillary Clinton, the federal government and the mainstream corporate media all acting in unison…."- Prof. Jacobson

                  1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

                    It's as if the Comey letter never happened...

                    Clinton deserved to lose, but Trump did not deserve to win.

                2. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  True. But it doesn't justify anything. I'm getting really tired of hearing "They did it first so it's ok."

                  1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

                    There is nothing wrong with payback, making an example of others.

                    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                      Mutually assured destruction stopped a lot of conflict.

                  2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

                    It's not just "doing it first".

                    If Party A violates the law in ways that subvert the outcome of an election, then what Party B does in opposition, even if breaking laws, might be justified and morally correct--not just tit-for-tat with Party A.

                3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

                  https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/

              5. R Mac   1 year ago

                The first thing Democrats did after Trump became president was frame General Flynn to get him off the chessboard.

                Do you even remember that?

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  I remember him calling it a conspiracy theory.

                2. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

                  I remember him pleading guilty. Twice.

              6. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

                1861 would like to have a word with you.

              7. DesigNate   1 year ago

                Yeah, no.

          2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

            Now do 2000 and 2016.

            1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

              Especially 2016.

              https://mtracey.medium.com/the-most-predictable-election-fraud-backlash-ever-4187ba31d430

              "Top media figures, academics, and activists like Peter Beinart, Larry Lessig, Michael Moore, Paul Krugman, and DeRay McKesson joined the haphazard putsch effort. TV stars like Martin Sheen and Bob Odenkirk recorded impassioned video pleas arguing for electors to subvert the expressed will of voters. John Podesta, the Hillary Clinton campaign chairman whose Gmail account was reputed to have been successfully “phished” by fearsome Russian “hackers,” issued a statement demanding that electors be granted an unheard-of “intelligence briefing” — with the implication for what should be done with that “briefing” information too obvious to need stating outright.

              The meeting in Harrisburg concluded with the expected affirmation of Trump’s win — followed by a desperate woman screaming from a balcony at the top of her lungs, “You just gave us Hitler,” before being escorted out by police.

              Of course what happened subsequently was that even years after Trump had safely taken power, the corporate media’s top luminaries continuously used the phrase “hacked the election” to describe the purported actions of Russia on behalf of Trump in 2016. Supermajorities of Democratic voters came to believe not just that Russia “interfered” in the election, but directly installed Trump into power by tampering with voting machines. Now, though, journalists who fostered these blinkered beliefs will feign incredulity that their conduct could have contributed to widespread “doubt” as to the “legitimacy” of that election. And they’ll be aghast at any suggestion that this was inevitably going to generate yet another crazed anti-legitimization initiative in 2020."- Michael Tracey

            2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

              Shit, in 2004 they were complaining about digital vote counting machines robbing Kerry of Ohio and thus the presidency.

              That wasn't even 20 fucking years ago, but it's obviously a lifetime in the short-term memory of Current Year America.

              1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

                Either they are complete idiots or they think we are.

                1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                  Can't it be both? Them being complete idiots for thinking we're complete idiots?

                2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

                  Worse. They actually are, but think they're the smart ones.

      3. Zeb   1 year ago

        People are definitely not going to accept the outcome of an election where their preferred candidate has been excluded based on, to put it mildly, dubious legal reasoning.

        1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

          If you're talking about CO I agree that that's BS. Realistically though it doesn't matter that state is reliably blue.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            Whether the state is reliably blue wasn't the point, though. The liberal "watchdog" group and the ex-GOP NeverTrumpers who brought the suit did it for the deliberate purpose of establishing a legal precedent for other states to follow. That they aren't wise enough to see the potential consequences of doing so is immaterial to the fact they think they're doing God's work to meet their objective of the moment. Their historic determinism leads them to believe it will all work out in the end, anyway.

            1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

              I know it's not the point. Just saying in the end it won't matter. I support more ballot access, not less.

              1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                As do I, and I'm pointing out that whether it won't matter or not, is not and never was the fucking point.

                The point is that these assholes think they can tell us who we can and can't vote for. THAT'S the actual issue.

                1. sarcasmic   1 year ago

                  aye

              2. Outlaw Josey Wales   1 year ago

                You support more ballot access but by your own confession don't vote. Who do you want to have more access? One wonders if you don't vote, perhaps your now mandatory mailed to you ballot votes anyway. Could your record of not voting be another path to getting more voters?

            2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

              I mean, I look forward to Florida and Ohio and Pennsylvania taking Biden off the actual electoral ballot. That will no doubt make sure everyone agrees this was the most legitimate election ever.

              1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                Florida and Texas might happen. So could states like Indiana, Iowa, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, and Oklahoma.

                Ohio and definitely Pennsylvania won't, but that's immaterial. This threat is why the SC needs to nip this shit in the bud before all hell breaks loose.

                1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

                  I don't know that any actually will. I was just picking "battleground" states that the loss of would utterly fuck the Democrats to lose.

          2. Zeb   1 year ago

            It won't matter this time, in Colorado. But it's a terrible and dangerous precedent to set. The supreme court needs to slap it down quickly or shit will get even uglier.

            1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

              There is an outside chance Trump might be able to make Colorado competitive, based on his improved polling amongst Hispanics, white women (the margins in the polls are much closer than in 2020), young people and blacks. Especially if Biden has a challenger from the left, or No Labels runs a candidate in Colorado. I wouldn't bet the farm on it, but if Trump does pull close to 50% of the popular vote, as some polls suggest he may at this point, it could make some edge blue states purple (New Mexico and Minnesota are also outside possibilities as is Nevada, definitely long shots but if the stars continue to align for Trump and the GOP, it's not impossible).

              1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

                NM isn't that strongly blue. We did elect Gary Johnson twice, after all. Of course, that was a long time ago and our current governor is an absolute shitshow.

                1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

                  NM pretty much turned solid blue in 2008 except for the southeast part of the state. Obama's candidacy is what started the migration of college grads over the the Dems.

    8. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      Well. It's a post by someone with access to the president's Twitter account.

    9. Bill Falcon   1 year ago

      Another day and other Israel obsessed Liz Wolfe column. No mention of the who killed two Catholic women in one of the oldest Catholic Churches in Gaza. Who shot them? Was it Hamas or the IDF or perhaps Christians are not a concern of Ms. Wolfe?

  2. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

    Jill knows

    See how easy that is?

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      At least somebody knows? Because it sure as shit ain’t Joe.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        Hunter knows!

    2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      The Shadow knows!

    3. Chumby   1 year ago

      Bo knows.

  3. Longtobefree   1 year ago

    The choice has always been ballots or bullets.
    Ballots are better.

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      There is ballot fraud. There is no bullet fraud.

      1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

        But no widespread - - - - - -

        Question: if one person submits 118 fraudulent acts, is it widespread because it is 118, or not widespread because it is only one person?

        https://thefederalist.com/2023/12/21/queens-resident-indicted-for-submitting-118-absentee-ballot-applications-during-new-yorks-2022-democrat-primaries/

        1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          What if 118 people shoot one guy?

          1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

            Without knowing skin colors, the question is unanswerable.

            1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

              Without knowing political affiliation, the question is unanswerable.

              FIFY

          2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

            What if one guy shoots 118 people? It was just one guy...

            1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

              Was he part of Hamas? Then it's just decolonizing.

          3. Chumby   1 year ago

            Something like that happened once during I believe the Renaissance. The villagers hated the local aristocrat that they bound him, mounted a firearm pointed at him, tied a string to the trigger, and all pulled on the string.

    2. Social Justice is neither   1 year ago

      Ballots are now off the table according to CO judges. I don't think they chose wisely.

  4. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    For as long as Donald J. Trump has dominated Republican politics, many Democrats have pined for a magical cure-all to rid them of his presence...

    Those elusive closing walls.

    1. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

      But we know they would never rig an election to get rid of him.

      1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        How dare you.

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        You shouldn't have even mentioned that. Now they have to kick you off the internet and go after your lawyer.

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Speaking if which...

          2021 Oregon passed a law making it a crime for misinformation or disinformation regarding elections. They are now paying a group to monitor all residents for what they say online.

          https://www.northwestobserver.com/index.php?ArticleId=3052

          1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

            The Secretary of State of Oregon is poised to launch an “Elections False Information Solution” contract...

            Wonder what kind of "Solution" they are referring to?

            Waiting for Sarc and CJ to explain to me how Hitleresque this title is.

            1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

              An interim solution or a final solution?

            2. Super Scary   1 year ago

              "Wonder what kind of “Solution” they are referring to?"

              The solution they come up with will be so thorough, it'll be the last one they will ever need.

            3. JesseAz   1 year ago

              The company who implements said solution is a private company, so there for they can do what they want.

              1. Fats of Fury   1 year ago

                Krupp steelworks was a private company so according to some Reason writers slave labor is perfectly acceptable.

          2. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

            Hmmm, who else policed speech during elections to assure only approved speech is allowed?

            1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

              I'll start:
              Napoleon III

            2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

              My 3rd grade teacher

            3. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              My high school's administration?

            4. Chumby   1 year ago

              EH Crump (D) until the McMinn County, TN War occurred.

      3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        If Zuckerbucks had been spent for Trump instead of against him, "fortifying the election", Mark would have been in court every single day for years to come on election tampering and bribery charges.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          You can never go wrong investing your money in the oligarchy.

  5. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Aid workers report that nearly all households in Gaza are out of food and water.

    Bidenomics, am I right?

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      But the generators still have an hour of electricity left.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        It's a Hanukkah miracle.

      2. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Still laugh about the reporter trying to get the old Palestinian lady to complain about Israel for lack of food and she kept telling the reporter Hamas was stealing all the food.

        1. Randy Sax   1 year ago

          I haven't seen that, can you post a link? I'm not saying I don't believe you I just wana see it.

          1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

            https://www.newsweek.com/gaza-woman-calls-out-hamas-keeping-aid-1850721

            1. JesseAz   1 year ago

              Thank you sir.

        2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          21st century joornalism.

        3. Bertram Guilfoyle   1 year ago

          That was mtruman in disguise I believe.

          1. Minadin   1 year ago

            In disguise?

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

              Exactly. The fucker has a favorite Nazi for Pete's sake.

              1. R Mac   1 year ago

                He literally does.

                1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                  But according to the dude with a favorite Nazi, pointing out Anti-semitism on the left is the actual Anti-semitism.

      3. John C. Randolph   1 year ago

        Maybe the Gazans should ask Hamas to quit diverting all the fuel to rockets.

        -jcr

  6. Nardz   1 year ago

    https://twitter.com/ramzpaul/status/1737835447739634051?t=PgF9_YJrRoPfJ8P5Asqq3A&s=19

    Yes, destroying our border does provide for cheap labor and it allows for the Democrats to eventually establish a one-party state. But the basic goal is much deeper, and it is not specific to America. The goal is to eliminate all White majority countries and White people.

    [Link]

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Skin color is the most important thing

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        Don't mention Tim Scott here. You will be called a racist by the Wokies.

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          Say Plugly, is it racist to call black supreme court justices and politicians "lawn jockeys"?

          1. Ska   1 year ago

            Uncle Clarence is a time honored, completely respectful, and not-at-all racist moniker stated with love in one's heart.

          2. Eeyore   1 year ago

            I thought it was Bench Monkeys?

        2. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Just your comments invoking racism abd minstealism for every conservative minority. Racism is deep in the left as you show weekly.

        3. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

      2. JesseAz   1 year ago

        It actually isn't skin color. It is socialist political ideology. They see this time in history to go all in. Sow as much chaos as they can. Take down rich nations. Globalize the political system and assume power.

        1. Nardz   1 year ago

          It's also skin color.
          The boomer pathological refusal to accept this fact is becoming more and more dangerous.

          1. JesseAz   1 year ago

            Skin color is a useful tool to implement ideology due to weak willed boomers.

            1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

              This.
              It's rich white billionaires pushing and funding all this.

              It's not anti-white. It's anti-proletariat, anti-working class propaganda dressed up as anti-white rhetoric.

              1. BYODB   1 year ago

                It should be concerning that an attack based purely on race is considered to be the more effective strategy than being honest about socialism and the intent to implement it fully.

              2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

                It goes the other way as well. They're using foreigners with a different skin color so that they can claim that objections to the plan are racist.

                1. JesseAz   1 year ago

                  This had been sarcs open borders argument for a while.

                  1. Nardz   1 year ago

                    And it 100% works on you because you're terrified of being seen as racist and spend insane amounts of time defending yourself against it.

            2. Nardz   1 year ago

              Correct.
              Weak willed boomers think rAcIsM is the worst evil ever, and think any generalization, pattern recognition, or group preference constitutes racism if done by whites.
              Weak willed boomers think being white is original sin, and that white people should live in fear of being even accidentally racist.
              Weak willed boomers think they can go on deliberately ignoring data, genetics, and macro trends to discriminate against white people while non-white people practice in group bias and demonization of whites.
              Weak willed boomers look at South Africa and the former Rhodesia becoming shitholes and think past racism is the cause of their decline.
              Weak willed boomers think it's racist to believe the people who say "we hate white people" actually hate white people.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Milei just delivered a message where he condemned collectivism...

    Fascist.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Probably also racist and sexist. And he probably hates fat chicks.

      1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

        Who doesn't?

  8. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    Uh Claudine Gay appears to have copied a couple phrases in her dissertation dedication from someone else's dedication?

    They make it more and more difficult to see this as anything other than a diversity hire. Which is crazy because there have got to have been qualified options that also filled the columns she filled.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Maybe she gives better head.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        I hear that's how Kamala Harris got several of her jobs.

        1. Chumby   1 year ago

          Give jobs to get jobs.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            It's one way to give a head.

            1. Chumby   1 year ago

              She’s known for her lip service.

              1. Sevo   1 year ago

                She did study politics under Willie Brown.

                1. Chumby   1 year ago

                  Are you saying there is a lot of Willie coming out of her mouth?

    2. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

      "They make it more and more difficult to see this as anything other than a diversity hire."

      Wrong. Gay never benefited from affirmative action at any stage in her life.

      In fact defenders of AA have repeatedly explained to me that Clarence Thomas is the only person who has ever benefited from the policy.

      #MakesSenseIfYouDontThinkAboutIt

    3. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      Same with Brown-Jackson, who has already embarrassed herself bigly in arguments. Same with Kamala Harris (no explanation needed, but will include Venn diagram below). Same with the press spox for Biden, who mispeaks so much and does such a shitty job they would trot out some lower spoxperson (white dude) to do her job for her in the early Ukraine days because she was so uniquely bad at her job.

      People already knew affirmative action hires as a concept was going to result in an inferior job performance, but now its almost inescapable for people not to think it.

      The only reason she wasnt pressured as much to resign is her skin color

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        I keep waiting for the tragic accident involving Air Force 2.

      2. mad.casual   1 year ago

        Vonnegut got it wrong with Harrison Bergeron. It's not a full ballet of mediocre people and talented dancers in chains, just full on closeups and features with the most inept dancers you've ever seen.

    4. R Mac   1 year ago

      “Which is crazy because there have got to have been qualified options that also filled the columns she filled.”

      Do they? I’m not convinced.

      1. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

        I think the ones Gay plagiarized were.

  9. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

    …bowhead whales that enjoy a cancer-free life that can span two centuries ..

    It’s difficult to smoke underwater.

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      But not impossible

      - Jacque Cousteau

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      And spittin tobaccy is too expensive for aquatic animals. Sea based inflation is nuts.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        Prices have gotten to salty!

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          Not enough liquidity.

          1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

            Waves of inflation.

    3. Chumby   1 year ago

      Virginia Swims

  10. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    The world is full of creatures that age in ways humans might consider aspirational, including bowhead whales that enjoy a cancer-free life that can span two centuries...

    Yeah, in the gross ocean. Pass.

    1. Ajsloss   1 year ago

      Fish fuck in there.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        And poop!

      2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        Wait until you hear what Democrats do in Senate meeting rooms.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Oh, fuck.

          1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

            No, ass-fuck.

            1. Chumby   1 year ago

              Film at 11.

        2. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

          Dude. Really?

        3. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

          When I am nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court I'm going to request a different venue.

          1. mad.casual   1 year ago

            I would still expect a hearing about you asking "Who has put a pubic hair on my Coke can?" not for the sexual impropriety but because you asked the question, one of your staffers raised their hand, and it was your fault for embarrassing them.

            Whether you ever asked the question being, of course, immaterial to the hearing.

            1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

              Mindbleach! Mindbleach!

        4. Eeyore   1 year ago

          It is homophobic if you don't watch.....with your pants off......

    2. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Cancer at 80 or... Lizzo playing James Madison's flute, naked, for 200 yrs.?

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        Oh, fuck no, and I thought we need brainbleach just due to the staffer in the hearing room.

      2. Eeyore   1 year ago

        Lizzo has turned more than one young male gay.

  11. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

    Situation dire in Gaza

    The long 1/2 day has finally come to and end.

  12. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

    There was a riot, rioters deserve to face criminal penalties. Donald Trump did not incite the riot; evidenced by the fact that it began before he ever finished his speech. Beyond that, it takes a lot more to meet the Brandenburg standard for incitement.

    Riots are not insurrections. A court can’t simply declare that an insurrection happened as a matter of judicial notice. The 14th Amendment was written in the context of an event that nobody could dispute happened.

    1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      Mostly peaceful protest.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        It wasn't even fiery.

    2. JesseAz   1 year ago

      They, being dems and dem defenders, also ignore section 5 of the 14th.

      Section 5.
      The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

      Congress has the power to legislate what the 14th means. They have done so. There is a law on the books regarding the 14th. Trump was never charged under that provision.

      They invoke section 3 and ignore section 5.

      1. Nardz   1 year ago

        It doesn't matter.
        Arguing technicalities is capitulation.

        1. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

          ^this

        2. DesigNate   1 year ago

          What do you expect anyone to do? Say they're going to take up arms just so they can get swatted at 3am or extraditioned to Guantanamo?

      2. BYODB   1 year ago

        Either way, nowhere does it say that states can decide what that means nor was Trump found guilty of anything in particular making this a fine example of wishcasting that will be destroyed upon contact with the SC.

        This was patently an effort to give the other states considering this option the go-ahead to do so, regardless of it's likelihood to survive scrutiny.

        The whole 'we need to become Hitler to stop Hitler' garbage needs to go.

    3. Mike Parsons   1 year ago

      "in the context of an event that nobody could dispute happened."

      ...uhhh, the people on the other side arguing this shit think that no one can dispute that trans women are women, men can have periods/babies....

      I dont think we are going to for forward with common sense "sky is blue, grass is green" logic with the clown world folks.

      1. A Thinking Mind   1 year ago

        …uhhh, the people on the other side arguing this shit think that no one can dispute that trans women are women, men can have periods/babies….

        Which is why they're always arguing about it.

    4. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

      Sums up my thoughts. +1

      Charge him with insurrection (they can't), successfully prosecute him and then and only then can you remove him from the ballot (which would be the least of his worries at that point), otherwise fuck off violating his due process rights and the peoples right to a Republican* form of government - I'd love to see a Guarantee Clause challenge succeed here.

  13. Spiritus Mundi   1 year ago

    Is the chatbot Grok…actually good?

    Better than the chat dog Gmork?

    1. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

      If it groks like Valentine Michael Smith, I say Hell yeah it's good!
      🙂
      😉

  14. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

    A plane with a sign that says "MELANIA KNOWS" flying near Trump's rally site in Waterloo, IA.

    "I really don't care. Do U?"

    1. mad.casual   1 year ago

      I'm not going to lie, I wish I had thought of "HILARIA BALDWIN KNOWS"

  15. Naime Bond   1 year ago

    Way back machine in History, '...Aid workers report that nearly all households in (Hiroshima, Nagasaki) are out of food and water. Roughly 85 percent of the total 2.2 million population has been displaced; of that group, 96 percent report adults skipping meals so kids can eat or eating scavenged meats that they would not normally consume. Some 13 percent report burning garbage to cook, while roughly 15 percent of displaced people cannot heat their food at all...'

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Further up,, people in north Vietnam are reportedly living in tunnels subsisting on fish heads and rice, their children unable to attend school.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Meh. What about the Neanderthals?

    2. Sevo   1 year ago

      "Way back machine in History, ‘…Aid workers report that nearly all households in (Hiroshima, Nagasaki) are out of food and water. Roughly 85 percent of the total 2.2 million population has been displaced; of that group, 96 percent report adults skipping meals so kids can eat or eating scavenged meats that they would not normally consume. Some 13 percent report burning garbage to cook, while roughly 15 percent of displaced people cannot heat their food at all…’"

      Really stupid to start a war you can't possibly win; there are consequences.

      1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

        It was, in fact, very terrible of Hamas to inflict this event on Gaza.

    3. mad.casual   1 year ago

      Some 13 percent report burning garbage to cook

      I know this might mark me a privileged white supremacist, but I'm gonna need to know how many Palestinians were burning garbage to cook before the invasion to know how I feel about this.

      The idea that Palestinians are taking time out of their busy days of rat poaching and burning their own dried feces for fuel double-plus tradwife fashion (like no one in the US has ever seen anyone set fire to anything in the street) to answer polls is cute though.

  16. Nardz   1 year ago

    https://twitter.com/CyberPunkCortes/status/1737631687398322630?t=n8LhL5anVceaQWMa-OxkEw&s=19

    The further destruction of Old America. Old America wrote the Constitution, conquered the West, and landed on the Moon. New American can’t stand it and will destroy every trace of it, an endless churning wheel of destruction.

    [Link]

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      New America is communist, and the one thing communists are devoted to is perpetual revolution.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        And actual poverty for the 99%.

  17. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

    America needs a Milei so bad

    1. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      80% of Americans wouldn't vote for a Milei

      1. VinniUSMC   1 year ago

        They'd reluctantly vote for... Biden?

        1. JesseAz   1 year ago

          Strategically. Return to norms.

      2. mad.casual   1 year ago

        If they saw him. I think if you had an Argentinian American named Javier Milei on the ballot you could get 51% of the vote, ~90% of whom would get pissed off when they saw that some white guy they didn't know anything about won the election.

    2. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

      No, America needs Milei supporters.

  18. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

    "To deny the voters the chance to elect the candidate of their choice is a Rubicon-crossing event for the judiciary," wrote New York magazine's Jonathan Chait. "It would be seen forever by tens of millions of Americans as a negation of democracy."

    LOL

    You know #TheResistance has officially jumped the shark if not even Jonathan "Trump Has Been a Russian Intel Asset Since 1987" Chait can defend it. 🙂

    1. MWAocdoc   1 year ago

      It's almost as if the "Democrats" WANT the people they've demonized to fight back so they can say, "See? We TOLD you so!"

      1. Nardz   1 year ago

        Keep telling yourself that.

      2. VinniUSMC   1 year ago

        It’s almost as if the “Democrats” WANT the people they’ve demonized to fight back so they can say, “See? We TOLD you so!”

        Yeah. Chants of insurrection haven't worked well enough, so now they mean to force a civil war to validate their crying wolf.

        1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

          I would rather have a Civil War than a Holocaust.

      3. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        The Enmity Counteraccusation

        This one is perhaps the most brazen. As I put it elsewhere, “the enemy calls you its enemy for recognizing its enmity.”

        As regime hacks spew vile, borderline—and sometimes explicitly—violent rhetoric at you, they will immediately wheel and counterattack if you dare object. Don’t appreciate being called evil because of your race? Then you are “divisive”! Dare put up your hands to block an incoming punch? That’s violence! You’re just supposed to take it.

        They’re enemies who treat you like enemies while they insist that you treat them as friends. At least, though, unlike the housebroken “Right,” they stab you in the front.

        A related point is that if you so much as speculate as to where their insane vitriol might lead the country, you will be accused of wishing for that outcome. It’s entirely possible that decades of anti-American, anti-white, anti-Christian animosity, coupled with nation-destroying trade, immigration and foreign policies, will not lead to civil war. Then again, it’s entirely possible that they might. If they do, the ruling class and the Left will bear the blame. Naturally, though, they will blame us.

        Indeed, they already are. Attempts to head off such a conflict by warning about it are treated as provocations intended to produce said conflict. One can be forgiven for wondering if their plan is to start it and then say we started it, sort of like insisting Poland triggered the Second World War by shooting back.

        https://americanmind.org/salvo/thats-not-happening-and-its-good-that-it-is/

  19. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    Speaking of anti-democratic Democrats...

    https://www.zerohedge.com/political/course-biden-admin-linked-trump-ballot-ban-colorado

    While many are focusing on the Ivy League Democrats on Colorado's Supreme Court who voted to kick Donald Trump off the 2024 primary ballot, there underlying case itself has a direct link to the Biden administration.

    The Colorado case against Trump was brought by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), headed by President and CEO Noah Bookbinder...

    ...who sits on the Biden administration's Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Advisory Council (HSAC), as the Daily Caller's James Lynch reports.

    Bookbinder is a former trial attorney for the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) public integrity section and former chief counsel for criminal justice for the Senate Judiciary Committee. He repeatedly donated to former President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign during his tenure with the Senate, Federal Elections Commission (FEC) records show.

    The DHS appointed Bookbinder and 32 other new members to HSAC in March 2022 ahead of the council’s first meeting under Secretary Mayorkas. -Daily Caller

    According to Lynch, HSAC has met numerous times - where they've produced various reports for Mayorkas ranging from "disinformation" to supply chains.

    Bookbinder was in attendance during a September 2023 in-person meeting of HSAC, according to meeting minutes.

    He also worked on a report produced by the DHS's 'Openness and Transparency Subcommittee' - providing recommendations for how DHS can become more transparent without compromising its law enforcement mission (sure!).

    So, to summarize, in order to save democracy, an official within the Biden administration supported an anti-democratic suit to have former President Trump removed from the ballots in Arizona.

    As Tucker Carlson noted, that is "the actual end of democracy."

    1. JesseAz   1 year ago

      The corruption of government. dnc, and these groups isnt even hidden. But don't dare call them fascist.

  20. Kristian H.   1 year ago

    You follow the train of political systems to you get where you want to go, then you get off, amiright?

    1. Minadin   1 year ago

      What IS it with Socialists and their hard-on for trains?

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        A form of collective sex (assuming they also build tunnels)?

      2. Chumby   1 year ago

        Many want to ride in the caboose.

  21. a.heroic.dose   1 year ago

    Israeli has a policy (Hannibal Directive) to kill its own security forces if they are at risk of being taken captive. It apparently extended that policy to its own civilians on October 7.

    If a state will kill its own citizens with impunity, what do you think that same state does to people it doesn't like? Still, I suppose I should applaud Reason for actually bothering to say anything at all. It certainly beats their habit of studiously ignoring the war. Of course, no mention of dead or injured Palestinians. Approximately 19,500 killed, over 50,000 wounded, more to come.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      FAFO

    2. Idaho-Bob   1 year ago

      If a state will kill its own citizens with impunity, what do you think that same state does to people it doesn’t like?

      Sounds very American under BHO

    3. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

      Proof? You got anything other Misek to back that up?

    4. VinniUSMC   1 year ago

      A.heroic.dose has a policy of being fucking Nazi scum. Go join Misek (and all of the other newly outed leftist Nazis) at the bottom of the Mariana Trench please.

    5. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      If a state will kill its own citizens with impunity, what do you think that same state does to people it doesn’t like?

      Ask you ally Lenin.

      1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

        No need to go that far, the Nazis did it too, and so does Hamas.

        1. Nardz   1 year ago

          But not Israel.
          Because Israeli government is the one government in the world beyond reproach.

          1. Sevo   1 year ago

            Fuck off and die Nazi shit.

            1. Nardz   1 year ago

              ^
              Keep it up

              1. Sevo   1 year ago

                Fuck off and die Nazi shit.

                1. Nardz   1 year ago

                  "Because Israeli government is the one government in the world beyond reproach."

                  "Fuck off and die Nazi shit."

                  LOL
                  Kill yourself.

                  1. Sevo   1 year ago

                    Fuck off and die Nazi asshole.

          2. VinniUSMC   1 year ago

            But not Israel.
            Because Israeli government is the one government in the world beyond reproach.

            I did not see this coming.

            1. Nardz   1 year ago

              Why not?
              I agree with you guys, you've convinced me- any comment about Israel or Israeli government that doesn't express full throated support and a complete absence of doubt in their integrity or motives means the speaker is a nazi.

              1. Nardz   1 year ago

                Come on, folks.
                Someone make the case why Israel's government should be perceived differently than we perceive other governments.

                1. VinniUSMC   1 year ago

                  Says the equivocating Nazi while treating Israel different than other governments.

            2. Sevo   1 year ago

              He's an antisemite and don't get him going on how poor Russia was *forced* to invade Ukraine.
              And a lying pile of shit as you can see just above.
              Fuck off and die, nazi shit.

              1. Nardz   1 year ago

                Sqrlvo the syphilitic faggot still cannot cite any support for his accusations, he just spews bile because he had literally nothing else inside him.
                Stop being a coward and argue the merits of your case, dimwit.

                1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                  I usually just have popcorn for these, but Nardz, when you're using similar verbiage as Pluggo, I'd suggest pausing for a bit.

              2. Nardz   1 year ago

                Let's look at sqrlvo's position here, since the dimwitted boomer brought up Ukraine.

                -Hamas killing 1400 Israelis means that criticizing, or even being skeptical of, Israeli government's response and attitude toward Gaza makes one a nazi. Israel's government is wholly good and pure, thus anything they in Gaza is moral.

                -Kiev killing 14000 Russians is also moral, but Russia intervening on their behalf after almost a decade of constant attacks is evil and immoral.

                Stay woke, sqrlvo!

                1. Sevo   1 year ago

                  Let's look at shit -for brains strawmen here:

                  "...-Hamas killing 1400 Israelis means that criticizing, or even being skeptical of, Israeli government’s response and attitude toward Gaza makes one a nazi. Israel’s government is wholly good and pure, thus anything they in Gaza is moral..."
                  Try again; I have never said of posted anything of the sort

                  "...Kiev killing 14000 Russians is also moral, but Russia intervening on their behalf after almost a decade of constant attacks is evil and immoral..."
                  Get back to us after you quit spouting propaganda, shit-pile.
                  "

          3. BYODB   1 year ago

            Even if Israel does bad things, they didn't go into Gaza beheading and raping as they went. Trying to draw some kind of moral comparison between Gaza and Israel results in a clear winner, and while that doesn't mean we need to get involved it does mean we could at least get out of their way.

            Apparently, Biden just can't help himself to get as involved as possible and there are plenty of Congressmen and Senators that think it's a grand idea as well.

            Of course, harping on Israel instead of the Ukraine isn't a great look on you. If you bothered to mention both instead of just Israel every time you'd probably get fewer people who think you're a Nazi.

            1. Nardz   1 year ago

              I didn't mention Israel, I mentioned people's response to criticism of Israeli government.
              Usually we can all agree that government is bad, and often quite willing to do evil.
              Yet when someone says exactly that about Israel, suddenly the white knights pile on to call the poster a nazi...

              1. VinniUSMC   1 year ago

                If you don't think a.heroic.dose is a Nazi, I've got news for you, that's very strong evidence (well, yet another piece of evidence) that you are, in fact, a Nazi.

              2. BYODB   1 year ago

                The comment I relied to literally mentioned Israel.


                But not Israel.
                Because Israeli government is the one government in the world beyond reproach.

                And since we see you endlessly harping on Israel, but very little to nothing about the Ukraine, one might be tempted to notice that it isn't our involvement that's your issue but rather who we are involved with that is.

                1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

                  Claiming "I didn't say that!" when it's right there is usually exclusively Sarc's trick.

                  Not today, I guess.

              3. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

                He was criticizing he was posting blatantly false bullshit. The IDF does not have any policy like he states they do. In fact, numerous IDF members have been taken hostage since 1967. Israel did nothing to kill them, instead they usually negotiated a prisoner swap to have them returned. Criticism is okay, posting blatantly false bullshit, antisemitic trope is an entirely different thing.

    6. Sevo   1 year ago

      "Israeli has a policy (Hannibal Directive) to kill its own security forces if they are at risk of being taken captive. It apparently extended that policy to its own civilians on October 7."

      You.
      Are.
      Full.
      Of.
      Shit.
      Fuck off and die, asshole.

    7. TheReEncogitationer   1 year ago

      Take your "heroic.dose" of Eighties Era Extra-Strength Tylenol, Carter's Little Liver Pills, Warfarin, Nitro Pills, and Zyklon B and join your Nazi brethren and sistern in The Great Beer-Hall for Worms in the Ground!

      Fuck Off. Nazi!

    8. mad.casual   1 year ago

      If a state will kill its own citizens with impunity, what do you think that same state does to people it doesn’t like?

      What do you think that same state does to people it doesn't like?

    9. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      Well, hopefully Israel will kill the rest, and you along with them.

  22. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

    I believe I have voted Libertarian Party every election since I started voting. I'm in California, it makes no difference to the outcome, and it helps improve their ballot access next election. But if California takes Trump off the ballot, I'll write him in.

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      I didn't even vote for the guy myself (I actually voted for the Constitution candidate), and Trump is too fucking old anyway at this stage, but this is the type of shit that provokes "fuck you" votes.

      Like I pointed out yesterday, Roberts needs to make it clear to his colleagues that these lawsuits need to be struck down with prejudice and to let the actual election play out. Colorado just gave every red state an opening to kick Biden off the ballot for, say, failing to actually fulfill his executive responsibility to keep the border secure (the justification won't actually matter, they'll just need to figure one out). The Democrats are going to do this in perpetuity now, as well, because they've been provided with the legal standing to do so.

      The only real hope of that stopping is if the Supreme Court takes a stand and tells the states, "No, you can't tell people who they can and can't vote for." That might even result in states having their write-in vote bans removed eventually, too, since such an action violates that right.

      1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   1 year ago

        I even have slight hopes the Supremes might be 9-0 on it. Just slight, but there.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          I wish I had that same slight hope. I'm expecting 6-3 if Roberts isn't an idiot over it.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

            Brown-Jackson will definitely be one of the outliers. It's just a question if both Kagan and the Wise Latina go along, or just one of them does.

            There absolutely will not be a 9-0 vote because of Brown-Jackson alone.

            1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

              Who says they will hear the case?

            2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

              Browne Jackson had a lot of great pop hits back in the 80s.

      2. BYODB   1 year ago

        The article in question is not delegated to the States in the first place so they are quite literally up shit creek with no paddle.

        The only way it survives is if the Supreme Court is in on the scam, but even then it's a matter for Congress not the Judiciary.

        For all Democrats talk about disenfranchisement, they just dropped the mother of all disenfranchisement bombs. If a drivers license is too big of a burden, not being able to vote for that candidate at all is a much higher burden.

    2. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

      The Colorado supreme Court ruling actually prohibits the secretary of state from counting write in votes for Trump. They could presumably count votes for Jack Mehoff and Idi Amin but not Trump.

      1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

        I strategically cast my vote for Jack Mehoff.

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          But definitely not reluctantly.

      2. Chumby   1 year ago

        Jack’s either on the ballot or Jack’s off.

  23. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    A real insurrection. Trigger warning: Brendan O'Neill.

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/12/20/a-judicial-insurrection-against-democracy/

    We didn’t need further proof that Trump Derangement Syndrome poses a graver threat to American democracy than Donald Trump himself, but we have it. The decision of the Colorado Supreme Court to disqualify Trump from holding office is the anti-Trumpists’ most egregious assault on democracy yet. It shows once again how willing they are to use the tactics of the banana republic, the sly schemes of a tinpot state, to take down a politician they love to loathe. ‘We are defending democracy’, they say, as they beat it to a pulp.

    The idea that the idiots who ran riot at the Capitol on 6 January are in any way comparable to a Confederacy of seven slave states that illegally broke from the American republic is unhinged. It is a testament to the historical illiteracy of the Democratic establishment that it would even hint at a likeness between men who caused a war that killed hundreds of thousands and Trumpists taking selfies in Congress during a conflagration that led to five deaths (three from natural causes). Not content with hysterically referring to 6 January as a domestic 9/11, now they’re implying it was a Civil War-level rupture. And this is leaving to one side the contested idea that Trump incited 6 January.

    There’s a dark irony here. The Dem-leaning justices cite an amendment that was designed to keep breakaway Confederates from power, and yet they themselves behave like breakaways, like arrogant rebels against the rest of the US. They’re potentially breaking Colorado from the republic, making it a special, Trump-free territory, a state that might forbid Trump from standing for the presidency even if the rest of the country gives him the green light to do so. They’re making Colorado a confederacy of one, a confederacy of Trump-loathers.

    Who are the real insurrectionists here? Trump for his ‘Stop the Steal’ idiocy and his ill-advised comments as things got heated at the Capitol on 6 January? Or the justices of Colorado who have unilaterally ruled that one man is forbidden from exercising his democratic right to stand for election, and millions are denied their democratic right to vote for him? This feels like a judicial insurrection. Sure, it’s more polite than the rough mobbing the world witnessed in January 2021, but it surely strikes at the heart of democracy more fiercely than that chaotic event did.

    The ruling feels like a threat to the foundational principles of America. A man is branded an insurrectionist despite never having been found guilty of such a grave offence. Due process be damned.

    Democracy be damned. I find the Colorado justices more menacing than that bloke in a horned headdress who wandered around the Capitol.

    To see how sinister the ruling is, consider the following stipulation in the judgement. It says that not only should Trump’s name be absent from presidential primary ballots in the state, but also that the electoral authorities must not ‘count any write-in votes cast for him’.

    And yet, even if it falls, the ruling reminds us of the tyrannical instincts of the anti-Trump elites. It reminds us there is almost nothing they won’t do to try to eliminate the threat posed by Trump and his followers to their political and cultural supremacy. From Russiagate to his arrest over the Stormy Daniels affair, from prosecuting him for holding on to secret documents to the desperate legal efforts to keep him off ballots, they’re hell-bent on depriving the American people of the fundamental democratic right to say: ‘We want Trump.’ We are destroying democracy to save it – that’s the doublethink cry of these despotic agitators against a second Trump presidency.

    1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

      Ouch, former Reason contributor. Again, it's obvious why his mug isn't shown around here these days.

      1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

        Why do you suppose that is?

        1. R Mac   1 year ago

          KMW is a leftist?

    2. BYODB   1 year ago

      Gotta say that about sums up how I feel about the whole thing. Pretty nuts to see this level of out-and-proud fascism in 2024, and not the made up nonsense kind either.

    3. DesigNate   1 year ago

      "yet they themselves behave like breakaways"

      Because Democrats haven't really changed over the last 150 years, they've just been better about hiding and rebranding themselves.

  24. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    California wants to follow Colorado into the abyss.

    https://www.thecentersquare.com/california/article_aa3ac88c-9f68-11ee-9bc3-8f8c2e62664a.html

    California lieutenant governor Eleni Kounalakis urged state secretary Shirley Weber to “explore every legal option” to remove former president Donald Trump from the 2024 primary ballot, claiming “California must stand on the right side of history,” and that “this is a dire matter that puts at stake the sanctity of our constitution and our democracy.”

    On Tuesday, the Colorado Supreme Court voted 3-4 to block former President Donald Trump from receiving votes on the 2024 presidential primary ballot, saying he is disqualified because he “engaged in an insurrection,” a reference to his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol protests gone awry.

    Noting the list of certified candidates for the 2024 primary must be certified by December 28, the letter from Kounalakis cited the Colorado decision, which she says is “about honoring the rule of law in our country and protecting the fundamental pillars of our democracy,” as the impetus for her call for Weber to act.

    1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      Where's White Mike?
      I want him to see what an actual insurrection looks like.

    2. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      lol utterly performative. he has no chance to win in california anyway.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Yeah, but with Trump excluded from all the blue state ballots, the PopUlAr vOtE!

      2. Minadin   1 year ago

        It's perhaps not, though.

        It's unlikely, but possible, that if he's not able to count any California Republican points / electors / delegates in the national Republican nomination process, he doesn't win the (R) nomination nationally. It gets more and more likely the more deep blue states kick him off their primary ballots.

        1. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

          The candidate is chosen at the convention.

          1. Minadin   1 year ago

            And?

            If all of the Republican delegates / electors from California, Colorado, and any other Blue state that tries this ballot access denial maneuver are bound to vote for whoever was allowed to be picked by their state's Republican voters?

    3. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      These people need to get helicopter rides so they can learn that history doesn't have a side.

      1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

        These helicopter rides can not happen son. enough.

        Helicopter rides are to Demunists what rope is to Nazis!

      2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

        I would like to take this moment to reiterate my support for giant trebuchet. We can make them wind it up for their own launch into shark infested waters. It's more environmentally friendly that way. 😀

        And then we get to go shark fishing!

    4. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      So is she saying Trump's not over 40 years old?

    5. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      When they say "our Democracy" the mean it in the same sense a couple might refer to "our car". They mean that they own it. And you don't.

  25. Ra's al Gore   1 year ago

    https://twitter.com/no_one_quits/status/1736956210690048320

    "Given the report’s finding, it can be argued that the entire national revenue of the Netherlands from fracking and other natural gas extraction measures, over the course of approximately 60 years, went entirely to feeding, housing, educating, and providing medical treatment for migrants and their children in the country."

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Sure, blame the immigrants for climate change.

    2. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      But migrants are ALWAYS net positive!

      1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

        Apparently I should have refreshed before snarking.

    3. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      But, always a net positive for the economy!

  26. Ra's al Gore   1 year ago

    https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2023/12/congo-wars-rainforest-conservation/676217/

    ...Deforestation in the region still isn’t as bad as it has been in the Amazon or some parts of Indonesia, Goldman told me, but that could change if peace at last comes to the region....

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      A lot of Africa would be in a position to become ascendant over the course of the 21st century, if they weren't so caught up in base tribal conflicts and lot of their populations didn't display such low impulse control. The continent is massive, still ridiculously rich in natural resources, and a focused, far-seeing nation would understand how to leverage that into global economic, military, and political power.

      I won't be surprised if Nigeria in particular becomes a powerhouse in the near future. South Africa had that potential, but its idiot majority population is doing its level best to just be another communist shithole.

      1. Nardz   1 year ago

        Hmm

      2. BYODB   1 year ago

        Africa won't have a chance to go that far as China moves in and takes over by corporate proxy.

      3. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

        It's all that vibranium.

  27. Nardz   1 year ago

    [Matt Yglesias tweeting: "This seems like the way forward on curriculum matters to me — you keep the cringe patriotism of “the old days” but expand the cannon of heroes to be more diverse and inclusive."]

    https://twitter.com/Chillcatser/status/1737828939270074450?t=ys0_iKTuudFR8WNcz2EONg&s=19

    It was mostly women and black people that won WWII

    1. Nardz   1 year ago

      "Heroes of World War II" book cover- 6 people drawn. 3 women, 2 black people, 2 white guys.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      This is so stupid. Leftists are incapable of maintaining any kind of patriotic fervor because their whole ideology demands that any sort of civic consensus be perpetually deconstructed until the supposed "contradictions" are smoothed away. Patriotism means acknowledging that heroes may not have been perfect, but that doesn't mean what they accomplished wasn't important and amazing.

      A culture steeped in relentless and neurotic self-criticism isn't going to have that same spirit. It's why "intersectionality" falls apart when there aren't any white people to rage against.

      1. Nardz   1 year ago

        https://twitter.com/QuetzalPhoenix/status/1737863605549187377?t=qNMzOoRcooR1c__YoAZ7AA&s=19

        Imagine showing this image and your comment to an american soldier that just came back from the war in 1945

        Be completely honest

        What would he say to you?

        1. Minadin   1 year ago

          Or a Russian, or a Brit . . .

          1. Chumby   1 year ago

            Misek’s great grandfather was a hero in WW2. He managed to kill a dozen enemy soldiers and may have taken more if it hadn’t been for Canadian troops capturing him.

    3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

      Had to actually sign in to twitter to see this image.

      Yglesias is a retard. I can't believe he's a regular go-to source with Reason writers.

      1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

        Have you seen the output of many Reason writers lately? Yglesias fits the theme perfectly.

    4. Zipcreature   1 year ago

      Such a disgusting and dishonest telling of American history. Whole lists of “African-American Medal of Honor Recipients” but none for only White recipients?
      Shit tons of Lefty articles on how ‘blacks won Ww2’ and ‘Women’s secret contributions to WW?!’ (Who knew it was them, all along?). Such liars and dishonest shitbags.

      1. Nardz   1 year ago

        All positive accomplishments of white men are a lie because it was really women, black people, and jews who did everything good that ever happened.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          And now the Jews are questionable.

      2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        Not to mention this shit was already being pushed in schools decades ago. I was told by my AP US History teacher that our end-of-year of research paper had to be on a "non-white history topic."

        That's not a paraphrase. Those were her exact words, and I only remember it because of how much it pissed me off that she wouldn't allow me to research a topic I might have actually been interested in, like the OK Corral gunfight ("Tombstone" had come out that school year and was a big fave).

        This was all happening during a time when she was putting in a bare minimum of effort to get us ready for the AP exam, which for a school that had mostly working-class/ghetto and military kids, was a big fucking deal since a top score meant saving money on tuition for college later on.

        I ended up doing some milquetoast crap paper about the Comanches where I emphasized what a bunch of tortuous, elder-abusing assholes they were, and got a B grade. My best friend didn't even bother doing a paper because he was already pissed at our teacher's lackadaisical attitude.

        Hilariously, we ended up being 2 of the 3 kids in the class who got a 4-5 score on the AP exam, while our class valedictorians got 3s. Everyone else landed 1s or 2s because they didn't know what the fuck they were doing and weren't really taught shit during the year.

      3. mad.casual   1 year ago

        Such a disgusting and dishonest telling of American history.

        The part that gets me is the self-defeating stupidity. It's going to be historically accurate representations of FDR, Patton, MacArthur, etc. vs. Hitler, Goebbels, Rommel, etc. vs. Emperor Hirohito, Tomoyuki, Tojo, etc. or it's just going to be meaningless blather. A black FDR defeating Hitler a decade before the Civil Rights movement doesn't make any sense. A black Fuhrer or Japanese Empress preaching racial imperialism and getting defeated by a white President and Generals still really makes the white guys look good.

        You can't pretend half of WWII soldiers were black *and* that blacks were a minority in the gen. pop. unless WWII was only fought with a few thousand or ten thousand people across 3-4 continents.

      4. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

        Blacks made up less than 5% of combat troops in WW2, most black combat troops didn't even see combat until after D-Day. Their biggest contribution was as truck drivers, but it wasn't even like all trick drivers, or even a majority, were black. Also, despite the myth of Rosy the Riveter, most of the manufacturing jobs during the second world war remained largely male. In fact, if your job was considered critical to the war effort, it was difficult even to volunteer. My maternal Grandfather tried to join the Navy, but because he was a hard rock miner and logger, he was barred from enlisting because his job was considered critical to the war effort (like a lot of males in the area at the time, he'd log in the summer and mine in the winter and the lines were lead-zinc-silver mines, so all metals crucial to the war effort). His younger brother was able to join the Army but they told my Grandpa he could do more for the war by staying home and working.

        1. DesigNate   1 year ago

          I actually didn't know that they would do that.

          1. soldiermedic76   1 year ago

            It really depended on your experience and skill. My Grandpa started logging after 8th grade, he was a gypo miner, his younger brother was much lower on the rung in both careers, so he wasn't considered critical and was able to join the Army. You could also get deferred after the went to an all induction force after 1943, if you worked in a critical industry. During the Vietnam War, in the same area, getting a deferment was fairly easy, and the ones who were conscripted were either really low on the rung or chose to wave their deferment. Quite a few did the latter.

            It wasn't just in the US either or unique to WW2. During the start of the Franco-Prussian War, the French barred married men and tradesman from the military, unlike the Prussians. It was only after the Germans destroyed two whole French field armies that France had to go back on that rule. There was some different rules for the French National Guard but their regular forces were banned from enlisting married men or tradesman.

            1. DesigNate   1 year ago

              That’s really interesting, thanks!

  28. VinniUSMC   1 year ago

    Colorado Supreme Court rules Trump from the ballot...

    Because they got high,
    Because they got high,
    Because they got high

  29. Rev. Arthur L. Kirkland   1 year ago

    Disaffected clinger Liz Wolfe thinks Melania is "sweet?"

    Misfits gonna misfit.

    Carry on, clingers . . . so far as your stale, ugly, right-wing thinking could carry anyone in modern American, and so long as your betters permit

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      They're a whole lot better people than you, hicklib progtard moron clinger.

    2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Show me a dem wife that is hotter.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        Jackie O is still the hottest Frist Lady ever.

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

          And JFK was the biggest government sex predator ever.

          1. Minadin   1 year ago

            Well, at least until Epstein's client list gets published.

        2. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
          turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

        3. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

          Lol, had to look back 60 years for one.

    3. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

      Why do you endlessly regurgitate "carry on clingers" when it's not close to your best material?

      THIS, Art. This if the funniest thing you ever wrote:

      "I wouldn’t mind seeing Judge Barrett confirmed, if only because I believe it would precipitate the installation of four new, better justices during the first half of 2021."

      1. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

        Oops! 🙁

        This IS the funniest...

      2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        Artie is such a retard.

        1. Sandra (formerly OBL)   1 year ago

          He reminds me of the long-haired grad student from Good Will Hunting.

          Except it doesn't take a genius to make Art look ridiculous. A 10th grade social studies student would have known that prediction was unlikely.

        2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

          I look forward to the day he forgets and says something to someone in person and gets fed his own intestines.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            That might be worth paying money to see.

      3. VinniUSMC   1 year ago

        Artie, Artie, he's our man,
        If he can't do it, maybe a 5 year old can.

      4. Chumby   1 year ago

        Art has an aptitude in being able to court ridicule.

    4. Sevo   1 year ago

      Fuck off and die, asshole bigot.

    5. DesigNate   1 year ago

      It really eats at you that we are all better people than you can ever hope to be, doesn't it Artie?

  30. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    ' "For as long as Donald J. Trump has dominated Republican politics, many Democrats have pined for a magical cure-all to rid them of his presence," wrote Reid J. Epstein for The New York Times, in an oddly self-aware piece that still manages to give airtime to an awful lot of clownish #Resistance types.'

    Maybe, but the chess players at the DNC are trying to simultaneously assure that Trump is the GOP candidate and damage him enough to limit his appeal outside his base. And if that fails, to justify extra-legal proceedings.

    1. Zipcreature   1 year ago

      Just like Hitler initially used legal means to ensure how couldn’t be challenged by a vote.

  31. Ra's al Gore   1 year ago

    The Harvard connection
    Was a Fauci-endorsed Chinese donation part of the lab-leak cover up?
    https://thespectator.com/topic/fauci-harvard-and-the-ccp/

    n the morning of Sunday February 2, 2020, Anthony Fauci, then in the middle of putting together America’s pandemic response, received an unusual email with a highly unusual request. The email, revealed as part of a tranche of FOIA documents requested by the Intercept, was from George Daley, the dean of Harvard Medical School. “Alan Garber, Harvard’s provost, and I met yesterday with a team led by Jack Xia, the CEO of China’s Evergrande Company, and Dr. Jack Liu, Evergrande’s chief health officer,” Daley wrote. Addressing the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases as “Tony,” he asked for “whatever information you are willing to share on your current efforts to coordinate a response.”
    ...
    Saturday February 1, Fauci had taken part in a conference call now widely acknowledged as one of the most charged events in the search to uncover the origins of SARS-CoV-2. The preceding Friday, Fauci forwarded a Science article exploring theories about the possible origins of the virus to a disease genomics researcher at Scripps in California named Kristian Andersen. The article mentioned a 2015 study authored by University of North Carolina epidemiologist Ralph Baric and Wuhan Institute of Virology researcher Dr. Shi Zhengli — China’s infamous virus-hunting “bat woman” — which modified a bat-borne SARS-like virus to make it transmissible between humans. “If the SARS2 virus were to have been cooked up in Shi’s lab, then its direct prototype would have been the SHC014-CoV/SARS1 chimera [created by Baric and Shi], the potential danger of which concerned many observers and prompted intense discussion,” the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists later reported.

    The discovery of this 2015 study appears to have been a giant red flag for Fauci, who was likely alarmed by the possibility that it might have been funded by the NIH (under which NIAID sits as one of twenty-seven constituent institutes) as it indeed was — despite the original publication failing to disclose this fact. Fauci forwarded the study to his deputy at NIAID, Hugh Auchincloss, with an ominous message: “Hugh: It is essential that we speak this AM… Read this paper as well as the e-mail that I will forward to you. You have tasks today that must be done.”

    The news only got worse from there. A little more than an hour after receiving the email from Fauci, Kristian Andersen responded with an alarming observation about the new virus galloping around the world: “The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome [and show] that some of the features (potentially) look engineered,” Andersen wrote (emphasis added). He pointed out that University of Sydney researcher Edward Holmes, another world-class virologist, as well as a small group of top researchers, “all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory.” Jeremy Farrar, head of the Wellcome Trust, the United Kingdom’s primary private health research funder, would later write that Holmes had 80 percent certainty the virus came from a lab, while Andersen put his certainty level at 60 to 70 percent.

    1. Zipcreature   1 year ago

      We know the Democrats worked and coordination to crash the world’s greatest economy in 2020 in order to hurt the reelection chances of Donald Trump. We knew they forced Democratic stronghold into years long lockdowns and school closures in order to hurt president. Donald J Trump we know the mainstream media lied collusion with Twitter and Facebook and the Biden administration in order to suppress damning stories about the Hunter Biden laptop in order to hurt President Donald J Trump’s election chances, we know the vast majority of social media banned conservatives, blacklisted and shadow band conservative content, and colluded to promote negative stories about conservatives and hid unflattering stories and ran cover for the Democrats.

      1. Gaear Grimsrud   1 year ago

        I think Trump was the initial primary target but they very quickly realized that the could get away with a whole lot more. And they aren't done yet.

  32. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    Frying pan into the fire?

    https://www.chicagocontrarian.com/blog/what-clayton-harris-would-mean-chicago

    When Cook County State’s Attorney Kim Foxx announced she would not seek re-election as county prosecutor at an address to the City Club of Chicago in April, the news was met across Chicago with a collective sigh of relief.

    For those who fear the damage Foxx wrought on Chicago could be reversed, brace yourselves. Among the Democratic candidates, two names have emerged: Retired Cook County Judicial Circuit Judge Eileen O'Neill Burke and Clayton Harris III, a lecturer at University of Chicago’s Harris School of Public Policy. On the opposite side of the political divide, former 2nd Ward alderman Bob Fioretti has announced his candidacy and is the lone declared GOP candidate.

    Though Mr. Harris has affected a bow tie to give him a professorial image, this is but a makeover to portray him as academically brilliant and determined to administer justice with dispassion. The rebranding of Harris serves one purpose: To disguise his radicalism.

    That Harris is the favorite to replace the bumbling Foxx is in large part due to the backing of Toni Preckwinkle. To understand Ms. Preckwinkle’s vision for Chicago, one must understand the board president is committed to ploughing on with criminal justice reforms. To Preckwinkle, criminal justice reform only blossomed under Foxx. With her vision for reform incomplete, Preckwinkle will commit herself to propelling Harris into the CCSAO with a ruthless determination.

    Sending Clayton Harris to the Cook County State’s Attorney’s Office would not be a Kim Foxx “third term.” Harris as Cook County’s chief prosecutor would be far worse.

    On record as supporting the SAFE-T Act and declaring the contentious Pretrial Fairness Act “ensures we are safer,” Chicago can expect Harris to leverage bail reform, which bars pretrial detention for defendants facing a raft of felony and misdemeanor offenses.

    It is also worthwhile to add Harris could also inflict harm as prosecutor on the occasion a law-abiding citizen defends themselves against a gun-wielding carjacker. To her credit, Foxx declined to prosecute instances of citizens in possession of a Concealed Carry License lawfully defending themselves against armed carjackers. Nevertheless, it is plausible to speculate Harris would prosecute citizens lawfully defending themselves against armed criminals.

    1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      Maybe Chicago will get lucky and one of its many aspiring choirboys will gap the fucker before he can run. Ms. Prickwrinkle, too.

  33. Ra's al Gore   1 year ago

    https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/hearings/ciasuseofjournal00unit.pdf

    CIA'S USE OF JOURNALISTS
    AND CLERGY IN
    INTELLIGENCE OPERATIONS

  34. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

    OK, this is a bit comical.

    https://cwbchicago.com/2023/12/seizure-notices-chicago-mayor-vehicles-tickets-unpaid.html

    The city of Chicago has issued seizure orders for two SUVs that shuttle Mayor Brandon Johnson around town because no one has paid a growing pile of speeding and red light camera tickets issued to the vehicles.

    Four SUVs dedicated to Johnson have collected 21 citations and one warning since he became mayor seven months ago. As of Wednesday night, the unpaid fines and penalties total $2,130.

    Johnson’s motorcade has picked up tickets at a dizzying pace. In fact, his SUVs have been tagged speeding and running red lights more often in seven months than Rahm Emanuel, Lori Lightfoot, and Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle received within four-year terms.

    Johnson’s SUVS owed the city $855 for eleven moving violations when we first reported on his motorcade’s driving habits on October 18. The debt ballooned to $1,725 by November 30. Now, the debt is $2,130…and growing.

    Since November 30, the city has issued seizure orders against two of the four mayoral SUVs. Three seizure orders have been issued for one of the SUVs for non-payment of three speed camera tickets. The city issued three more seizure notices against another car for failing to pay two speeding tickets and a red light violation.

    Only two of the 21 tickets Johnson’s cars have received since he was sworn in have been paid.

    We’ve repeatedly asked the mayor’s office about his motorcade’s speeding and red light running habits. We’ve asked who’s supposed to pay the bills and when they will pay up. We’ve asked why the mayor needs to fly through school and park zones at more than 50 mph.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      See, put a black guy in a SUV and it goes out of control.

      1. JesseAz   1 year ago

        Lol.

    2. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Bet he doesn’t get bumped off the ballot for breaking the law.

  35. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    "But it is at least heartening to see some level of collective awareness that these are not the means by which Trump should lose; a regular old election is the way we tend to handle this, and for good reason."

    Liz, are you crazy? How dare you suggest that we risk democracy by letting people vote?

  36. Ra's al Gore   1 year ago

    The family is an abusive institution, unless it isn't, in which case it is an unfair advantage.

    Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?
    https://www.abc.net.au/listen/programs/philosopherszone/new-family-values/6437058

    ..I don’t think parents reading their children bedtime stories should constantly have in their minds the way that they are unfairly disadvantaging other people’s children, but I think they should have that thought occasionally.

    ...‘One way philosophers might think about solving the social justice problem would be by simply abolishing the family. If the family is this source of unfairness in society then it looks plausible to think that if we abolished the family there would be a more level playing field.’

    1. Ra's al Gore   1 year ago

      Don't play with your kids. Don't read to your kids. Your kids should interact with agents of the State and only agents of the State.

      Don’t Play With Your Kids. Seriously.
      https://www.nytimes.com/2021/06/15/magazine/kids-play.html

      1. tracerv   1 year ago

        This is the Central Scrutinizer
        That was Joe's first confrontation with the law
        Naturally, we were easy on him
        One of our friendly counselors gave him a do-nut
        And told him to stick closer to church-oriented social activities

    2. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      The family is an abusive institution, unless it isn’t, in which case it is an unfair advantage.

      Either way, it calls for (more) state intervention in child rearing.

    3. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      Industrial privileged class nihilism.

    4. I, Woodchipper   1 year ago

      He concedes parenting might not be for everyone and for some it can go badly wrong, but in general it is an irreplaceable relationship.

      This guy sounds like a real winner. only a "philosopher" could spend years of academic life coming up with this: "‘Parenting a child makes for what we call a distinctive and special contribution to the flourishing and wellbeing of adults.’"

    5. JesseAz   1 year ago

      Loving families is right wing indoctrination per Jeff.

    6. Quicktown Brix   1 year ago

      Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?

      Life is not a game. There are no unfair advantages.

    7. Zeb   1 year ago

      Fucking unbelievable. If you think that denying children advantages they could easily have had with no cost to anyone else is a good, or even marginally acceptable way to combat injustice or unfairness, then you are a fucking piece of shit and no one should listen to you ever again.
      Almost as despicable is the idea that doing good things for your own children is somehow harming or disadvantaging other people's children.

      1. BYODB   1 year ago


        Almost as despicable is the idea that doing good things for your own children is somehow harming or disadvantaging other people’s children.

        It's the same old story progressives have been telling for over a hundred years: minorities need white saviors and white people need rich white saviors. Neither group have any agency, and what little they might have is a negative since they tend to choose things that their rich white saviors disagree with.

    8. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      Or we could just execute all the supposed do-gooders, since they're the ones who keep things unbalanced for the less fortunate.

    9. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this
      infamous proposal of the Communists.
      On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois family, based?
      On capital, on private gain. In its completely developed form, this family
      exists only among the bourgeoisie. But this state of things finds its
      complement in the practical absence of the family among the
      proletarians, and in public prostitution.
      The bourgeois family will vanish as a matter of course when its
      complement vanishes, and both will vanish with the vanishing of capital.
      Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by
      their parents? To this crime we plead guilty.

  37. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    "Situation dire in Gaza: Aid workers report that nearly all households in Gaza are out of food and water."

    Where's that guy with the loaves and fishes?

    Also, what happens when you teach a Gazan to fish?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Also, what happens when you teach a Gazan to fish?

      The fish get traded for bullets and an AK?

  38. Ra's al Gore   1 year ago

    Fired for his act of love in the senate
    Aidan Maese-Czeropski's act was symbolic and brave, because in a world full of hate, displays of love are rebellious. We shouldn't bend over to a party that hates; we must do the opposite.
    https://afru.com/senate-hearing-room-love-incident/

    ..And in a time when the LGBTQ community is under existential threat by white fragility feeling threatened, open displays of LGBTQ culture are necessarily brave. In some ways, Aidan’s act mirrored that of Anne Frank, who dared to express her honest thoughts and feelings even as she hid from rabid insurrectionist-style death squads.

    1. Moonrocks   1 year ago

      his act of love
      It wasn't a protest demonstrating what the Senate does to taxpayers?

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      What. The. Actual. Fuck!?! That was a display of fucking, not love.

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

        Welcome to the current day.

      2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        For the children. Or with them.

      3. mad.casual   1 year ago

        That was a display of fucking, not love.

        Wait, they said it was love? I was distracted by the self-aggrandizing, contemporaneously broadcasting gay dude being compared to the teen girl published posthumously after being captured by the dominant and corrupt political party at the time.

        The interpretation is too completely retarded to be believed in good faith. Whether it's satire or earnest disinformation I can't say, but nobody could possibly try to shove their own victory so far up defeat's ass accidentally.

    3. Super Scary   1 year ago

      "And in a time when the LGBTQ community is under existential threat by white fragility feeling threatened, open displays of LGBTQ culture are necessarily brave."

      So...only white people hate LGBTQ things? I don't understand.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

        Consistency isn't the goal, and the issue isn't the issue. The issue is whatever will advance the communist revolution.

    4. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

      This does remind me of a time when gay activists told us they just wanted to be treated like everyone else, and the context of the Saint Patrick Day parade in NYC. You know, the one where all those crazy Irish people run around in bare-assed chaps and simulate sex acts.

      1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

        Except without the "simulation" aspect.

    5. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      We shouldn’t bend over

      Uh, wasn't that what caused him to lose his job in the first place?

    6. JesseAz   1 year ago

      I wwnt through some other articles there. I honestly can tell of it is a parody site or just off the rails.

      1. Longtobefree   1 year ago

        To quote Wednesday Addams, "does it matter?".

    7. Zeb   1 year ago

      And in a time when the LGBTQ community is under existential threat by white fragility feeling threatened
      Where the fuck do people get this shit? Every major institution and corporation in the country is bending over backwards to be seen as tolerant and accepting. More people are openly identifying as alphabet people than ever. And is there a whiter movement anywhere than LGBT? Go visit any non-white ethnic community and see how open and accepting they are of sexual minorities.

      1. Nardz   1 year ago

        Are you suggesting there is are positive aspects of white culture?

        1. Zeb   1 year ago

          Why, yes, I believe I am.

          1. Nardz   1 year ago

            Does that mean skin color isn't just a weapon communists use to divide people, but that there are qualitative differences?

            1. Zeb   1 year ago

              I honestly don't know aside from the obviously visible differences. There are too many variables to sort out. I don't think skin color does (or should) exclude anyone from participating in what one might call "white culture". Many people, of all colors, have done quite well for themselves in adopting certain western norms and values.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                Because the proper terms are "Western culture" and "Western Civilization". Those are what the norms are here, and anyone can adopt them.

                1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

                  Well, they were the norms here. I'm not sure that's true any longer.

      2. BYODB   1 year ago

        Yeah, I mean I do know some black gay men but any time there's a parade it's notable just how overwhelmingly white those groups are.

        Not that it matters in the slightest, it's just an amusing fact. Dave Chappelle has literally talked about this issue, and if he wasn't Dave he would have been instantly cancelled. They tried to do so, in fact, but it turns out most frail trans activists don't want to go toe-to-toe with an angry black dude. Chapelle isn't even that intimidating outside of his vast intellect.

        1. Zeb   1 year ago

          Of course it isn't all white. But "white culture" is the only culture that has really gone out of its way to be accepting of all the gay stuff.

    8. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      I'm not sure I'd want to claim getting ass fucked in the Senate halls as a "display of LGBTQ culture", unless I really wanted to drive home the point that LGBTQ people is utterly depraved.

      Which, apparently they do. Carry on, then.

    9. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      Are we supposed to believe that this clown was fired solely because of *gay* sex, and not the simple act of inappropriately having sex (of any sort) in his workplace (not to mention, it's the Senate hearing rooms). As if should a straight aide of, say, Marco Rubio, laid pipe with some buxom blonde in the same room that he would NOT have been fired?

    10. LIBertrans   1 year ago

      Hey.... Dickless Fatboy stripper did a good job of making the LP convention look like a monkey cage. Even paved the way for anarco-commies and anarco-fascists to team up and pull an Anschluss to turn the LP into a Jehova's Witless convention. TO hell with showing up in the vote counts and knocking looters into runoffs and defeat.

  39. Ra's al Gore   1 year ago

    https://twitter.com/colorblindk1d/status/1539236296165564416

    The head of the LA Teacher's Union:

    “Our kids didn’t lose anything. It’s OK that our babies may not have learned all their times tables. They learned resilience....They know the words insurrection and coup.”

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      They know the words insurrection and coup.

      Looks good on your resume.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        Unless the FBI can create a link from you to J6.

    2. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      They certainly didn't learn resilience based on the evidence, and they already knew the words "insurrection" and "coup" because that's what their commie teachers want them to conduct.

    3. Longtobefree   1 year ago

      "They know the words insurrection and coup."

      But not what they really mean - - - - - - - - -

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        There's a commenter here who doesn't know what they really mean either.

        1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

          He does act like a baby...

        2. DesigNate   1 year ago

          There are several.

    4. mad.casual   1 year ago

      They know the words insurrection and coup.

      [El Guapo voice]Would you say that by cutting in-person education, the students learned what the word 'coup' means?[/El Guapo voice]

    5. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

      But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace
      home education by social.
      And your education! Is not that also social, and determined by the social
      conditions under which you educate, by the intervention direct or
      indirect, of society, by means of schools, &c.? The Communists have not
      invented the intervention of society in education; they do but seek to
      alter the character of that intervention, and to rescue education from the
      influence of the ruling class.

  40. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    'Meanwhile, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) report that they have found massive networks of Hamas tunnels throughout their ground operation including, yesterday, a "center of power for Hamas' military and political wings," under Palestine Square—in the center of Gaza City—which "was located in the direct vicinity of commercial stores, government buildings, civilian residences, and a designated school for deaf children," per statements from the Israeli military.'

    What, no abortion clinic, transgender care center, and Diversity Bureau office?

  41. Ra's al Gore   1 year ago

    Pending defense agreement would let U.S. troops use bases in Finland
    https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2023/nov/2/pending-defense-agreement-would-let-us-troops-use-/

    After negotiations lasting more than a year, Washington and Helsinki are close to signing a defense cooperation pact that would allow U.S. troops access to military bases in Finland and set up storage depots for American weapons, vehicles and other equipment.

    The move to strengthen U.S.-Finnish relations gained new urgency following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Finland and Russia share an 830-mile border, and the conflict swung the Nordic country’s public support in favor of joining NATO. It became a member of the alliance this past April.

  42. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    Did Claudine Gay plagiarize? No, she is a black woman.

  43. Nardz   1 year ago

    https://twitter.com/johnkonrad/status/1737805821453414817?t=wHyF43nNAFU_kcUWwtYnsQ&s=19

    US Navy says they don’t have enough warships to start Operation Prosperity Garden

    [USA] built 24 littoral combat ships but - for good reason - isn’t using them.

    Question: If the LCS cannot defend a merchant ship against Hoothi drones, how is it going to defend itself in combat?

    Question 2:

    Aren’t the hoothies a relatively minor actor operating on the littorals?

    Isn’t this exactly the type of threat the LCS was built to manage?

    1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

      The Houthis have been holding serve against the Saudi coalition for over a decade now, despite the latter using all kinds of western MIC toys, thanks to their Iranian sponsors. A demoralized and undermanned US military isn't going to do shit against an enemy with purpose, resolve, and the backing of a near-peer strategic adversary.

      1. BYODB   1 year ago

        Calling Iran 'near-peer' is, of course, nonsense. They can hold their own in our limited proxy battles but nations with no military to speak of can make the same claim as Iran.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

          I wouldn't be so sure about that these days.

    2. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      Yeah. The Clitoral Wombat Shits were a monumental clusterfuck.

    3. mad.casual   1 year ago

      [USA] built 24 littoral combat ships but – for good reason – isn’t using them.

      Sounds like a lesbian clusterfuck to me.

  44. Ra's al Gore   1 year ago

    https://twitter.com/Justice_forum/status/1737165994940924340

    The Welsh Government and Refugee Council is using little girls to encourage refugees to claim benefits and housing in Wales, a 'sanctuary country'.

    1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

      Well, some of those refugees are from cultures that really like young girls.

      1. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        Many of them are not particular and also really like young boys, too.

        1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

          Sure, but on that particular island, Rotherham suggests they're more likely to aim at the lasses than the lads.

  45. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

    James Taranto used to have a WSJ column (loved it), that would often included topics under the rubric "Fox Butterfield, is that you?"

    Reading this headline made me think of that...

    The Boston Globe
    Numbers of new learner’s permits and driver’s licenses soar since law allowing licenses for undocumented immigrants

  46. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

    awful lot of clownish #Resistance types.

    Liz, please answer, do you like me?

    [ ] Yes!

    [ ] Maybe

    [ ] I can't be seen as playing favorites in the comments, I'll call you later.

    1. Don't look at me!   1 year ago

      Everyone knows fist is the most loved.

      1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

        *Shakes fist at Fist*

        1. Fist of Etiquette   1 year ago

          Commentception.

    2. Chumby   1 year ago

      She visits here but it is currently unclear which account is hers.

  47. Sevo   1 year ago

    "...Now, a hefty chunk of the mainstream media reaction to the Colorado decision has been…impressively aware of how flimsy the legal logic is, contra my expectations. That hasn't stopped some people from doubling down, though:..."

    Including the TDS-addled shit-piles posting here, right SRG?

  48. Super Scary   1 year ago

    "But it is at least heartening to see some level of collective awareness that these are not the means by which Trump should lose; a regular old election is the way we tend to handle this, and for good reason."

    Hrrrm, I don't know. I think all we have left are "fortified" elections.

  49. Z Crazy   1 year ago

    Brandon, in his withdrawal from Afghanistan, left behind American weapons and equipment for the Taliban.

    Brandon aided and comforted the Taliban.

    Brandon's disqualified.

    Looks like Cuntala’s disqualified too!

    https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/1267555018128965643

  50. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

    What blows me away is we were told that if Trump came back, they'd further fortify the elections to make sure it never happened again. And now we're watching it happen in real time and the chattering classes are analyzing the "case" for Trump being removed from state ballots.

  51. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

    Does Reason have a size limit on comments? I have tried to post a long quote, with additional edits, and it keeps bouncing me to the top of the page and does not post.

    1. Super Scary   1 year ago

      "Does Reason have a size limit on comments?"

      Based on a certain shizo's posts, I wouldn't have thought there was. His copypastas are always so long.

      1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   1 year ago

        I just tried again, and got the same negative result. Could I be on a special secret list?

        1. Sometimes a Great Notion   1 year ago

          If you find out if your on Reason No Post list, let me know. I can't post a link without the same happening to me; direct link or HTML tag doesn't work.

          1. LIBertrans   1 year ago

            Gosh. Try flinging faeces over at Hiro Sledge. They might appreciate true genius over there.

            1. R Mac   1 year ago

              Did you transition Hank?

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

      Ken Schultz says "no".

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        Why was Ken banned?

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
          But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.

        2. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          Unlike you, Ken wasn't banned.

        3. Z Crazy   1 year ago

          Do you still look at pictures of naked underage girls? Your sick!

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

            They were male, not female, IIRC.

            1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

              Look at the two Denny Hastert conservatives making pals with each other.

              1. Z Crazy   1 year ago

                Your the creepy ep[hebophile here!

              2. Sevo   1 year ago

                turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
                turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.

              3. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

                So, uh, please explain for the sake of the commentariat why you have a "2" after your name.

    3. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      I had the same happen to me a couple of days ago when posting about how Reason staffers would vote in 2020. The post was too long apparently.

      1. Dillinger   1 year ago

        is "so's my johnson" still funny? it's been 39 years

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

          "That's what she said."

  52. Rev Arthur L kuckland   1 year ago

    Hamas bragged about turning water pipes into rockets

  53. Use the Schwartz   1 year ago

    They're weak and cornered.

  54. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

    Donald Trump's history with Adolf Hitler and his Nazi writings: ANALYSIS

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/donald-trumps-history-adolf-hitler-nazi-writings-analysis/story?id=105810745

    Good read here. Donnie has always admired Hitler and his style, the respect he earned among the MAGA Aryans, and his magnetism (according to Fatass).

    1. Sevo   1 year ago

      turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

        Sevo, do you also keep a copy of "Mein Kampf" on your nightstand for some late inspirational reading like Donnie does?

        1. Sevo   1 year ago

          turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
          But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

            Sevo, that is your Misek gibberish.

            Please try to direct your gibberish at the correct person next time.

            1. Sevo   1 year ago

              turd, the TDS-addled ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
              If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
              turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

        2. Z Crazy   1 year ago

          Why is your keyboard sticky? Are you jacking it to pics of naked 14-year-old girls? Or is 14 too old for you?

    2. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

      The guy who has a Jewish daughter and grandchildren, the guy who was the first sitting president to pray at the Temple Mount, the guy who arranged the Abraham Accords, the guy who sent out Hanukah cards for the past forty years, the guy who moved the embassy to Jerusalem, HE'S THE NAZI!

      Just ask Buttplug's people who are calling for the destruction of Israel and attacking Jews in the streets and breaking the windows of Jewish owned businesses. They'll tell you how he's Hitler.

      This has to be the single stupidest gaslighting campaign in the history of stupid gaslighting campaigns.

  55. Red Rocks White Privilege   1 year ago

    Cripple fight!

    A holiday party hosted by Michigan's 13th Congressional District Democratic Party devolved into chaos after pro-Palestine activists crashed the event. On December 16, members of the Palestinian Youth Movement and Party for Socialism and Liberation crashed the event and confronted Representative Shri Thanedar over his support for Israel. Video shows people shoving and shouting at each other. Community activist Bobbie Avington-Smith was sent to the hospital with two black eyes. She took to Instagram live after the event, proclaiming: 'Them Arabs in motherf***ing Detroit tried to kill me!'

    1. John C. Randolph   1 year ago

      The Hamassholes are attacking Democrats? Don't they know that the whole Hamas Caucus in the congress are Democrats? How many generations of inbreeding does it take for people to get that fucking stupid?

      Or maybe they attacked the Democrats' shindig because if they tried it at a Republican event they'd be energetically ventilated.

      -jcr

      1. BYODB   1 year ago

        When it comes to inbreeding, last I checked Pakistan is doing their part. No made up shade required, it's actually observable in their genome.

    2. tracerv   1 year ago

      Woman with two black eyes. She REALLY didn't listen.

      1. mad.casual   1 year ago

        You're forgetting the most important thing: she showed up at the event with two black eyes.

  56. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

    You know who else thinks immigrants are poisoning the blood of Chicago?

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

      Mayor BJ has managed to do what few other mayors in Chicago history have ever accomplished, piss off the black populations of the South and West Sides so much that they might even vote for the other team. It's ironic, as these are the exact same people who voted for Mayor BJ in the first place.

  57. Z Crazy   1 year ago

    We've seen anti-Jewish protests on college campuses, some of them violent.

    And not just in deep Republican areas, or swing areas, but deep DEMOCRATIC areas. Colleges like Harvad and Colombia University.

    If Trump is literally Hitler, then he'll literally win in a landslide.

    1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   1 year ago

      Trump is not "literally" Hitler.

      Donnie is just a wanna-be strongman tyrant who admires Hitler and other dictators like Vlad.

      I still get ill recalling Donnie French-kissing Vlad in Helsinki.

      1. Z Crazy   1 year ago

        And your a ephebophile.

        You need to stay away from schoolgirls!

        1. Mother's Lament   1 year ago

          No he's a pedophile, puberty is a big no-no for Shrike.

          If you wanna be Shrike's lover,
          you gotta be under ten,
          when you turn eleven,
          the relationship will end.

          1. Chumby   1 year ago

            Shrike likes Baby Spice

      2. Sevo   1 year ago

        The TDS-addled ass clown turd lies. That's not a surprise to anyone who reads his constant stream of bullshit.
        But it's becoming obvious that as Misek is too stupid to understand the concepts of "evidence" or "relevance", the concept of "honesty" is simply beyond turd's ken.

      3. InsaneTrollLogic   1 year ago

        So, why the "2" after your name, Pluggo?

      4. Medulla Oblongata   1 year ago

        I remember when Obama wished he could just get things done the way they can do it in China. And how he wanted to use his presidential powers AFTER the midterms to help Putin/Russia...

        President Obama: "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved but it’s important for him to give me space."

        President Medvedev: "Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you…"

        President Obama: "This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility."

        President Medvedev: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir, and I stand with you."

        1. BYODB   1 year ago

          It's as if nobody remembers that they mashed the 'reset' button on Russian relations with Obama and Clinton getting a lot of the credit.

          Weird, right? It's almost like Hillary was projecting when talking about Trump.

  58. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

    Here is Glenn Greenwald's take.

    https://rumble.com/v42dziu-sustem-update-show-202.html

  59. DarrenM   1 year ago

    Trump has not been tried, let alone convicted, for any kind of "insurrection". This sets a precedent. If a former President can be punished by the government without due process, I see no reason this could not evolve into an ability and practice of the government punishing anyone without due process.

    1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

      Other commenters are pointing out that FJB could be disqualified from the ballot.

      1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

        I think we should pre-emptively bar Newsome from national elections due do his repeated egregious wilful violations of the Second Amendment.

        1. Z Crazy   1 year ago

          Looks like Cuntala’s disqualified too!

          https://twitter.com/KamalaHarris/status/1267555018128965643

  60. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

    Here is a take from an anti-Trumper.

    https://www.thefp.com/p/colorado-court-trump-2024-peter-meijer-democracy

    "Broadening the Fourteenth Amendment understanding of insurrection from the horrendous bloodshed of a civil war or equivalent catastrophe will open the floodgates to tit-for-tat challenges. If Trump’s rhetorical culpability for January 6 qualifies, similar lawsuits against Democratic politicians who encouraged BLM rioters will swiftly follow. Was Kamala Harris giving “aid or comfort” when she fundraised bail money for rioters? You can imagine where this could go."- Peter Meijer

    1. Dillinger   1 year ago

      >>You can imagine where this could go

      I imagine it will goto Was Kamala Harris giving “aid or comfort” when she fundraised bail money for rioters?

  61. JFree   1 year ago

    a hefty chunk of the mainstream media reaction to the Colorado decision has been…impressively aware of how flimsy the legal logic is,

    Wotta fucking surprise that the mainstream media is a bunch of moronic tools. As are apparently the commentariat here. This case was always intended for the SC. The opinions of lower courts to get there are merely the pre-arguments of what will be argued at the SC. Sec3 of the 14A has a meaning. That meaning is fleshed out by courts not by voters or political parties.

    The biggest reason CO is pushing this suit is because CO is one of the slew of states (NV, MN, KS, NB, ME, AK, HI, WA and CO) that got rid of the caucus system for presidential candidate selection in/after 2016. THAT was the crappy decision here and both parties supported it because they wanted taxpayers to pay for primaries and because they wanted to separate how parties are actually run (all state parties are actually governed by caucuses) from the hordes of sheep who really don't give a shit about changing the parties or performing the responsibility of citizens but merely want to pointlessly opine about Prez elections that are completely meaningless.

    The only voters who understand how govt actually works - including in particular the Electoral College and Presidential elections are those who live (lived) in a caucus state (now IA, ND, WY, ID) AND who attend (or have attended) those caucuses. Everyone else (that means you) is an asshole and a sheep and is led by a media/journalists/parties that are assholes and sociopaths.

    1. Sevo   1 year ago

      Your mommy told you that you were smart. She lied, asshole.
      Regardless of your off-topic, self-serving, obnoxious rant, it certainly is surprising that consistently anti-Trump media would find fault with the ruling.
      Oh, and fuck off and die.

    2. BYODB   1 year ago

      Another hot take from JFree implying this is somehow not federal jurisdiction despite this amendment being explicitly designed as federal jurisdiction explicitly over the rights of each individual state. Last I checked the Federalists won.

      I'm sure you could be dumber, but at the moment I'm failing to see how. Perhaps your next comment will enlighten me.

      1. JFree   1 year ago

        What part of This case was always intended for the SC. implies that this is not federal jurisdiction? The lawsuit is moving from court to court exactly as the Constitution intends.

        What the media/commentariat is saying is that:

        Only the voters (more accurately - 50.1% of the electoral college adjusted voters) can decide what 'engaging in insurrection' means (even when that question itself will not be on the ballot) and that neither the states nor the feds can do anything. All candidates must be placed on all ballots by all states. And there is - I assume you will accept - no legitimate procedure for Congress or a Prez to assert that some candidate is verboten to all states. Assuming of course that the voters also agree on the results of that election.

        Primary voters in primary states are simply stupid and unthinking. And the mainstream media likes it that way.

        1. BYODB   1 year ago

          If it's designed to reach the Supreme Court than it was also designed to fail once it reaches the Supreme Court. The Federal government gets to decide this issue, like it or not, and there is no interpretation of the 14th that changes that to be the reverse where states or the people get any say whatsoever.

          Section 3 was actually explicitly designed to over-ride states and the will of the people by the Federal government.

          It simply does not work the other way around, and unlike some other cases this actually does have lengthy set precedent. It's something like 150 year old precedent, but that's the stupid prize you get for playing stupid games.

          1. JFree   1 year ago

            That is only because back then the states were sending insurrectionists and the feds put the 14A in place to prevent insurrectionists from occupying federal office.

            Now, by the argument here, it is a federal party that is protecting insurrection and a state that is trying to prevent what they see as an insurrectionist from occupying federal office.

            Even the perceived insurrection is different now. The insurrection was secession then - thus state driven. It is subversion of the oath of office now for purposes of eliminating elections for President. That IS what you R's are supporting - subversion of the oath of office for purposes of eliminating peaceful transition of power. Even if Trump is just a narcissist cult leader with no agenda beyond himself.

            This is not some rote fed v state issue. You don't even understand that the roles have been reversed. It is pro-insurrection v anti-insurrection. And regardless of who comes out on the winning side or not - it is an absolutely legitimate case to go to the Supreme Court.

            1. BYODB   1 year ago


              That is only because back then the states were sending insurrectionists and the feds put the 14A in place to prevent insurrectionists from occupying federal office.

              Right, which means States and the People respectively get zero say in this. If they did get a say, then the U.S. could have elected a Confederate into the Presidency via any former Confederate state. It was explicitly designed to stop States or the people from doing exactly what Colorado is attempting to do here.

              It's yet another case of Progressives using a statute, or in this case a full on amendment to the Constitution, to do the opposite of what it's actually for.

              It's just one more example of novel legal construction, which is a fancy way to say they are throwing all the shit they can find at the wall in the desperate hope something sticks. The fact they're using a Civil War amendment that is, at face value, frankly against the very notions of democratic rule is full on insane. If someone thinks January 6th resembles the Civil War, they are retarded and should be disbarred.

    3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

      The biggest reason CO is pushing this suit is because CO is one of the slew of states (NV, MN, KS, NB, ME, AK, HI, WA and CO) that got rid of the caucus system for presidential candidate selection in/after 2016.

      Washington got rid of its caucus system because Bernie Sanders won it and the I'm-With-Her corporate democrats lost their shit over it.

      1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

        I mean, right?

        An Awkward Reality in the Democratic Primary
        Washington voters handed Hillary Clinton a primary win, symbolically reversing the result of the state caucus where Bernie Sanders prevailed.

        By Clare Foran

        As Sanders makes those arguments, he runs up against a few inconvenient realities. He trails Clinton in the popular-vote count and has performed well in caucuses, which consistently witness depressed voter turnout relative to primary elections. What happened in Washington is a painful reminder of this for the campaign: Far more voters took part in Washington’s Democratic primary than its state caucus, preliminary counts indicate. Roughly 230,000 people participated in the Democratic caucus, The Stranger reported in March. In contrast, more than 660,000 Democratic votes had been tallied in the primary as of Tuesday, according to The Seattle Times. That lopsided reality makes it more difficult for Sanders to argue that his candidacy represents the will of the people.

        Overall, Sanders has tended to focus his criticisms of the Democratic primary process on aspects of the nomination race that have put his own campaign at a

        [...]

        And so on and so on. People didn't suddenly wake up after decades and worry about the cost, they worried that noisy activists could hijack the caucus system and insurgent (whoa, take the language down a notch, will ya) candidates could overwhelm the DNC favorite.

        1. JFree   1 year ago

          That was the proximate reason the D establishment here also decided to junk caucus. The R's decided to junk future caucuses because they had decided to junk a "presidential straw poll' at the caucus because the national GOP had forced any such poll to be binding on convention delegates. Which was as confusing and annoying to the R's who showed up as it was to anyone reading that previous sentence. And the uniparty donor class had long since decided that a caucus system is not as favorable to big donors as an ad-driven primary system - so they had a readymade 'open primary' proposition for the Nov ballot.

          1. LIBertrans   1 year ago

            SO the anarcofascist Anschluss model is catching on?

            1. Truthfulness   1 year ago

              anarcofascist

              Do you even know what you're talking about? That's an oxymoron, moron.

  62. R Mac   1 year ago

    Who knew Jeffy was making kids cartoons for Netflix?

    https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/1737450520170631360

    1. Michael Ejercito   1 year ago

      That is filthy!

    2. tracerv   1 year ago

      Is one of the Dad's Seth Rogan??

    3. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   1 year ago

      Post op or pre op?

    4. Zeb   1 year ago

      Maybe I wasn't paying enough attention. But it seems like we skipped a lot of steps in between tolerance and encouragement/glorification.

      1. BYODB   1 year ago

        It's top down propaganda so they don't need to worry about approval of the masses. Well, not until they realize that gay male biracial couples with a trans child account for probably a rounding error in American demographics.

        It's the Bud Light idiocy all over again, and no doubt there's an ivy league retard behind this choice.

        1. Nazi-Chipping Warlock   1 year ago

          It takes a lot of very expensive education to become that stupid.

          1. mad.casual   1 year ago

            I think Rufo is taking the wrong tack with the whole plagiarism thing. He really need to look at stuff like this, find the nearest Ivy Leaguer or even just the person who most overpaid for their education and shame them as the $100K/yr. (or whatever) clown college graduate.

            You paid a boatload of money to go to school to crater Bud Light's reputation so deep they may never climb out? You're clearly just stupid, but the people who taught you your job and the people who taught them their job should be ashamed!

  63. Dillinger   1 year ago

    I hate being four hours late lol

    >>Situation dire in Gaza

    those Hamas assholes should let the poor Gazans have some food.

  64. Dillinger   1 year ago

    >>Nobody knows yet whether, when taken up by the Supreme Court, this ruling will be smacked down.

    not if world's wealthiest Supreme Court Justice John Roberts has any say

    1. (Impeach Robert L. Peters) Weigel's Cock Ring   1 year ago

      Thankfully, liberal John Roberts is now outnumbered by justices who truly believe in the Constitution, so he doesn't have nearly as much say as he used to.

  65. Chumby   1 year ago

    libertarian Liz loves lavishing ‘literation liberally

  66. TJJ2000   1 year ago

    One thing is sure obvious about the Trump-hate mob. No matter how much they mimic-ed the less-government desire the less-government is about the only thing they have to hate Trump for.

  67. JasonT20   1 year ago

    But it is at least heartening to see some level of collective awareness that these are not the means by which Trump should lose; a regular old election is the way we tend to handle this, and for good reason.

    Liz Wolfe thought that the decision was so legally unsound that she didn't bother with any arguments about the legal aspects of the case. Instead, she appeals to consequences and what should be done.

    1. Sevo   1 year ago

      This is the blood-thirsty pile of lefty shit who endorses murder of the unarmed if it might keep them from doing, uh, he's not quite sure:
      JasonT20
      February.6.2022 at 6:02 pm
      “How many officers were there to stop Ashlee Babbitt and the dozens of people behind her from getting into the legislative chamber to do who knows what?...”

    2. DesigNate   1 year ago

      Even if she had, you'd be here arguing that she was wrong.

      1. Sevo   1 year ago

        Yeah, Jason and honesty are but passing acquaintances.

    3. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      Republicans are now the party of "outcomes". Who'd a thunk it?

  68. Agammamon   1 year ago

    >Aid workers report that nearly all households in Gaza are out of food and water.

    Meaning everyone is well fed and has about 30+ days of water and food on hand each.

    Just like the 'generators only had power for about 36 hours' that turned into 2 months.

  69. LIBertrans   1 year ago

    Lizard outs herself as a girl-killing MAGAt rupanzee. Jesus, Alabama, AfD, Fon Meeses, Orange Hitler and the Caucasian Caucus are having a field day at the expense of the former LP. It worked for a while for Quisling and Laval.

    1. DesigNate   1 year ago

      Photo crabapple blue site pancake.

  70. Bill Falcon   1 year ago

    States kicking off opposing political party candidates will certainly accelerate a national divorce. Corn Pop daily has his agencies trash the 1st, 2nd, and 4th amendments...so....

    1. ObviouslyNotSpam   1 year ago

      If that's what has to happen for the Constitution to be respected, so be it. The rule of law is better than tyranny.

  71. justinteststhings   1 year ago (edited)

    This is just right.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

'Banal Horror': Asylum Case Deals Trump Yet Another Loss on Due Process

Billy Binion | 5.29.2025 5:27 PM

Supreme Court Unanimously Agrees To Curb Environmental Red Tape That Slows Down Construction Projects

Jeff Luse | 5.29.2025 3:31 PM

What To Expect Now That Trump Has Scrapped Biden's Crippling AI Regulations

Jack Nicastro | 5.29.2025 3:16 PM

Original Sin, the Biden Cover-Up Book, Is Better Late Than Never

Robby Soave | 5.29.2025 2:23 PM

Did 'Activist Judges' Derail Trump's Tariffs?

Eric Boehm | 5.29.2025 2:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!