How Reason Changes Minds, Lives, and Laws by Covering Criminal Injustice
Yet another reason to donate to Reason's annual webathon!

Why do people first come to Reason, and therefore, in some cases, to libertarianism?
As we motor through day four of our annual webathon, in which we ask our most loyal consumers to consider making a tax-deductible donation to the 501(c)(3) nonprofit that publishes our journalism and commentary, it's worth pausing to note the category of story that always fills the most seats, year after year: outrageous tales of government injustice against undeserving individuals.
Here are our top three stories of the past 365 days, as measured by traffic:
1) "Trump Commuted His Sentence. Now the Justice Department Is Going To Prosecute Him Again," by Billy Binion
2) "A 5-Year-Old Pulled Down a 3-Year-Old's Pants. The Preschool Workers Are on Trial," by Lenore Skenazy
3) "Connecticut Parents Arrested for Letting Kids, Ages 7 and 9, Walk to Dunkin' Donuts," by Lenore Skenazy
Seeing the pattern here?
IF YOU WANT MORE ARTICLES LIKE THIS, PLEASE DONATE TO REASON RIGHT THE HECK NOW!
Nothing teaches the hard lessons of libertarianism more primordially than the sight of deadly force monopolists leveraging their massive power against a single innocent human engaging in peaceable activities. The It in Jerome Tuccille's fun libertarian memoir It Usually Begins With Ayn Rand refers to the minting of new libertarians, and while that was definitely true in 1971 when the father of J.D. wrote his minihistory, Rand has been joined in gateway drugging by personages such as Ron Paul, and by categories of civic revulsion, particularly toward criminal injustice.
Reason's commitment to this topic is both comprehensive—check out these special magazine issues from 2020 and 2011—and consequential. Lives have changed for the better because of our work.
How many publications that you read can come up with lead sentences like this, from our resident Freedom of Information Act warrior C.J. Ciaramella?
Hundreds of people in Tennessee serving outdated prison sentences for drug-free school zone offenses may soon have a shot at resentencing, following a Reason investigation four years ago that showed how harsh and illogical their sentences were.
And that trick, from 2022, was no one-off. Ciaramella and criminal justice reformer Lauren Krisai this year wrote a great piece, "The U.S. Probation System Has Become a Quagmire," which led five months later to the state of Minnesota capping its probation sentences.
Billy Binion's chart-topping article above, about convicted money launderer Philip Esformes being reprosecuted for the same criminal conduct that former President Donald Trump had commuted the final 15 years of his prison sentence for, was cited in a Rep. Andy Biggs (R–Ariz.) letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland asking to have the charges dropped, and also discussed in bipartisan congressional hearings about criminal justice reform.
Binion's story about an L.A. SWAT team destroying an innocent man's printing shop after an armed standoff with a criminal and then refusing to compensate him for the damage became the inspiration for a CNN segment by Jake Tapper. And he was the first reporter to bring what would eventually become a cascade of national attention onto the case of the government seizing, selling, and profiting from the house of a 94-year-old woman just because she had fallen $2,300 behind on her property taxes.
And of course, Senior Editor Jacob Sullum has been writing so well and for so long about the outrage-intersection of enforcing laws prohibiting guns and drugs that he has a whole book coming out on the subject.
Behavior that gets rewarded gets repeated. Do you want Reason to repeat and expand its criminal-justice outrage coverage, thereby improving people's lives and creating baby libertarians? Then you know what to do:
DONATE TO REASON TODAY! You'll be glad you did…
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Can we get an option to only donate to the good Liz?
And do we have the option to do it by taking money away from Welch?
I don’t want to interfere with commerce by others. But if we could donate just to the good Liz, I’ll pony up $100.
I'll tell you what's criminal. WHERE IS LOBSTER GIRL?
Well not all criminal injustice. Political criminal injustice is largely ignored.
Cry more.
Its okay buddy. Shhhh. Supporting arresting political enemies is totally libertarian. Don't let anyone tell you different. You do you buddy. Call your support of political arrests any word you want.
It will be okay.
Sarc is the boy that cried wolfe.
Fuck off you drunk pussy. Adults are trying to have a conversation here.
For the most part, Reason's criminal justice coverage pushes me further in the opposite direction. Their coverage of the most unsympathetic criminals is biased, misleading, and leaves out the most relevant information. On the other side, they've supported kangaroo courts and extreme stretching of the law in prosecutions against those they disagree with politically. This site is pro-criminal and heavily against effective and unbiased rule of law
That's true but wildly exaggerated. The site is by no means pro-criminal. But they are TDS-addled, with Sullum being the main exhibit.
Get out of DC.
Fire KMW.
Start thinking of liberty first, then pragmatism.
Their every position on this topic is pro-criminal but you can pretend until they get their way and reality bites you all in the butt.
For the most part, Reason’s criminal justice coverage pushes me further in the opposite direction.
I suppose that's "changing minds" too.
Like Hillary and Obama caused me to "change my mind" about Democrats.
MasterThief, you couldn't have said it better.
But pro-criminal is the libertarian way, so it is no surprise that it is how REASON deals with law enforcement.
It’s almost like there’s a bunch of irrelevant leftbertarians sitting on the sidelines with a wildly inflated sense of their own impact and importance. I could’ve never guessed that that’s a thing.
How Reason Changes Minds, Lives, and Laws by Covering Criminal Injustice
Is there any evidence that Reason is changing minds? Because while Reason is at least factually accurate in some areas of coverage, when it comes to criminal justice coverage in Reason, it almost always amounts to one-sided presentations of supposed sob stories that usually amount to local governments sometimes hire bad people.
The comment section to articles is evidence Reason isn't changing minds. Can you cite any evidence it is even factually accurate as often as not?
I used to align pretty well with everyone here.
When KMW endorsed mandated COVID shots for kids to return to school on a roundtable podcast is where I started to drift. I get it, everyone was tired of having to hole up with the schools shut down. Hindsight is always 20/20 but I will never forget that kind of turnaround in the face of facts.
It was that moment of weakness, though, that pushed me to realize that perhaps Reason is not the leading thought on libertarian philosophy, but more utilizing libertarian philosophy as a tool to advocate for each contributor’s moral and political positions.
So I now no longer look up but now just look across, using a Jeet Kune Do style of picking out bits and pieces of what makes sense and discarding the rest. My only hope is that the rest of the contributors aren’t self censoring so I can get their full and honest approach to things, even it means going against what is popular in the office (sorry looking at you Matt).
Making this the top “story” on the reason main page likely won’t change the fact that this is getting mostly crickets for resonance.
Reason
Sell Wolfe shirts in your store or make them gifts at the at $X donation level.
Lone Wolfe Libertarian
Even a casual reading of the comments to ANY article on Reason should be sufficient to prove Reason DOES NOT change minds.