David Fincher's The Killer Is a Subtly Funny Movie About a Loser Assassin
Despite Fincher's reputation as a gloom-monger, his movies are often quite bleakly funny, and his lonely, agitated male loser characters are frequently the targets of the jokes.

David Fincher movies appeal to a very particular Type of Guy.
You may know this Type of Guy, because he is ubiquitous on the internet. He had a Fight Club poster in his college dorm room. He's seen Se7en too many times. He has some thoughts about the Zodiac Killer and Facebook that are at least partially informed by Fincher's movies about those subjects. He owns many black T-shirts. He really, really likes Nine Inch Nails, the industrial band fronted by frequent Fincher collaborator Trent Reznor, but in an intellectual way.
Fincher's movies appeal to this Type of Guy because they are often about this Type of Guy. His filmography is defined by portraits of a particular type of male rage and ennui, of men who feel lost, disconnected from social convention, surrounded by the disposable detritus of consumer capitalism, stuck in their heads with their unstoppable thoughts. Fincher's movies take a keen interest in this Type of Guy, capturing his Wikipedia-level nihilism with grimdark slickness; they are glamorously moody and precise in a way that not only appeals to this Type of Guy's taste and sensibility but has helped define it.
But Fincher isn't celebrating this Type of Guy, not really. He's mocking him. Despite Fincher's reputation as a gloom-monger, his movies are often quite bleakly funny, and his lonely, agitated male losers are frequently the targets of the jokes. Fight Club isn't a comedy, exactly, but it's a caustic satire of its narrator character, a corporate drone who—spoiler—imagines a sexy Brad Pitt alter ego who leads a cult built around bored loser guys who let off steam by beating the crap out of each other. He's practically the definition of this particular Type of Guy. And this Type of Guy loves David Fincher movies because they see themselves in them.
Fincher's newest film, The Killer, is also about this Type of Guy. In this case, the Guy is another unnamed character—listed in the credits only as The Killer—who works as a high-end assassin-for-hire. The movie opens with an extended sequence in Paris in which The Killer waits for a target. He does yoga. He eats McDonalds. He watches a luxury hotel building from a window across the street. And he thinks. He thinks about his code (don't ask questions, don't develop feelings). He thinks about his amoral philosophy. He thinks about the nature of existence, the divides between the haves and the have-nots, about boredom itself. He views himself as precise, methodical, unflinching, unfeeling—as someone who has transcended conventional views about morality and conventionality of any kind. Unlike everyone else, he sees the cold truth about the world.
We hear all of this in Michael Fassbender's flat, affectless voiceover, and for much of the film, it's all we hear. There's almost no real dialogue during the first 25 minutes of the film, just a portrait of The Killer waiting, watching, thinking. We're trapped inside his head with him.
And what we can see is the thing that The Killer himself cannot—which is that he is actually rather absurd. He wears dopey bucket hats and dresses, he explains, like a German tourist, so that Parisians will avoid him. He snacks on crappy fast food, and the window he waits at is in an abandoned WeWork. His half-baked Nietzschean worldview doesn't make him cool; it makes him ridiculous. And when the time finally comes to make the kill, he misses. He's not even good at his job.
The Type of Guy who likes David Fincher movies tends to enjoy movies about cool, edgy hitmen, which is very much what this movie is, except that in Fincher's amusingly twisted vision, it's a movie about how that type of movie—and the particular Type of Guy it elevates—is actually fairly silly. It's a sleek, sharp, subtly hilarious send-up of moody sociopathic assassin glamour. I'm a David Fincher Type of Guy myself, so obviously I loved it.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I enjoyed it well enough but it didn't leave any kind of mental aftertaste - definitely a case of style over substance. And if you're going to cast Tilda Swinton, don't give her a part than any decent actress could do. Give her a part that only she can do. it would actually have been more entertaining if she'd been the Killer, tbh. Nor were much acting chops required of Michael Fassbinder. It's like having a Bentley Continental and just using it to drive to the mall.
I followed it immediately afterwards by another film called "The Killer", a 2022 Korean film. Perhaps not as stylish or "deep", but a much more entertaining experience.
Fincher and Netflix should have given us a third season of Mindhunter instead.
#PsychoKiller
I'm making over $7k a month working component time. I saved hearing other people inform me how lots cash they could make online so I decided to look at it. Well, it turned into all proper and has definitely modified my life.
This is what I do ══════►►► http://Www.Smartcareer1.com
Sounds like another Emperors New Clothes kind of movie. In reality the movie sucks. Those people who talk how wonderful the movie is wants to appear the intellectual and isn't brave enough to admit the truth so they come up with a pile of BS on how the movie is secretly deep and meaningful.
Then other people claim the movie is deep and meaningful when they really found the movie to be crap because they don't want to be seen as too stupid to get the deep meaning.
If more people were brave enough to just say the movie was crap Hollywood would go broke making crap no sane person wants to watch.
You may know this Type of Guy, because he is ubiquitous on the internet. He had a Fight Club poster in his college dorm room.
Yeah, yeah, I know that guy. He voted for Bernie Sanders and subscribes to The Young Turks.
Like I said…
In the realm of cinema, David Fincher's penchant for darkness doesn't preclude a subtle infusion of humor, as evidenced by "The Killer." Known for crafting narratives around solitary, uneasy male protagonists, Fincher manages to extract laughter from their predicaments. Just as his films tread the fine line between gloom and comedy Loklok for tv free similarly finds a delicate balance, emphasizing the unexpected humor in an ostensibly serious endeavor. Just as Fincher adds levity to his narratives, "Loklok for tv free" injects a playful note into the seemingly serious world of television, highlighting the unexpected joy in breaking free from conventional norms.