Federal Prison Censors Reason Issue About How Federal Prison Employed Serial Rapists
The issue was rejected because it "jeopardizes the good order and security of the institution."

A federal prison blocked an incarcerated Reason subscriber from receiving one of our recent issues. It's the one whose cover story showed how the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) allowed a cadre of guards to sexually assault female inmates with impunity—and allowed them to escape legal consequences after they confessed.
Reason received a notice last week that FMC Devens, a federal men's prison in Massachusetts, rejected the October 2023 issue of the magazine. The cover story details how at least a dozen women were abused by corrupt correctional officers at FCC Coleman, a federal prison complex in Florida. A Senate investigation later revealed that those officers had admitted in sworn interviews with internal affairs investigators that they had repeatedly raped women under their control, yet they were allowed to retire without ever being prosecuted by the Justice Department.
The rejection notice from FMC Devens says the issue "is being rejected due to the nature of its content. The magainze [sic] contains an article about Bureau of Prisons staff at FCC Coleman including the names of Correctional Officers and victims. Such material jeopardizes the good order and security of the institution."
Of course, all the correctional officers named in the story are now retired. And the women all went on the record with their names when they filed a lawsuit, which the U.S. government eventually settled for about $1.5 million.
This is far from the first time Reason has had a run-in with prison censors. Issues of Reason have been impounded by Florida and Arizona prison officials. The latter found a on the deplorable conditions inside the Washington, D.C., jail "detrimental to the safe, secure, and orderly operation of the institution."
Prison censorship is pervasive across the country. A Marshall Project database published earlier this year of books banned in state prison systems lists more than 50,000 titles. Prisons and jails also restrict nonprofit groups and loved ones from sending incarcerated people used books, a policy that several groups around the country are challenging on First Amendment grounds.
The BOP did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Reason is appealing the rejection. There are plenty of things jeopardizing the good order of the BOP—endemic corruption, chronic staff shortages, horrific medical neglect—but a magazine article about the agency's documented failure to hold its employees accountable isn't one of them.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
That was a good issue. Maybe we can bake it into a cake for him or something.
Bureau of Prisons (BOP) allowed a cadre of guards to sexually assault female inmates with impunity—and allowed them to escape legal consequences after they confessed.
Unfortunately, this is a much more complex topic than we're making it out to be.
If only because we know that women would never celebrate, uh, [checks notes] shared, positive healing experiences among each other that would be regarded as rape if a man did the exact same thing.
Women can do no wrong. It is known.
Well, it's not like prisoners have all their constitutional rights - - - - - -
have you seen the lists of banned reading materials in most prisons? anything that angrys up the blood ...
Reason: Too hot for Prison!
NSFDOC
Wow, all the spam posts got vanished.
Reason magazine just censored my 10 tips to get rich quick!
You won't believe #6!
Funny how leftists will stand firmly behind any and all censorship of everyday people if they don't follow the prescribed narrative but will see a world of wrong in censoring anything that criminals are allowed to see (within the narrative of course).
I don't think that it is 'censorship' to not allow certain books and magazines into prisons. This is not the outside world, the people running these institutions are morally and legally obligated to protect a huge number of very dangerous and violent people with myriad mental disorders.
I would prefer that my loved one was safe in prison from riots and violence that could occur from provacative literature than to be 'free' to discuss all ideas.
Yeah, this is Reason. Anything short of the state providing taxpayer-funded kiddie porn and grooming material to convicted serial child rapists is the utter collapse of the 1A.
The only people prison administrators are "protecting" are themselves.
"... jeopardizes the good order and security of the institution ..."
If only the institution had good order and security in the first place ...
Well, I think it's pretty clear that prisoners "don't have all their civil rights". That's pretty obvious on its face. Imprisonment was not in the past referred to as "durance vile".
So what do we want prison to "accomplish"? What is the goal of imprisonment? I'd suggest, in the order of importance to me:
(a) isolate malefactors from citizens (and thereby protect citizens),
(b) provide a threat to deter potential malefactors,
(c) punish malefactors (and be seen to be punishing them) to negate the inclination to private vengeance and vigilantism,
(d) and rehabilitate the salvageable to the degree possible
With the exception of those condemned to capital punishment (another whole topic) and those who receive real life sentences (i.e., you're going to die in your cell eventually), even if you can't rehabilitate them, someday you're going to have to turn them loose at the end of their sentence. Do you want to have turned them into permanently infuriated, nothing-to-lose, ravaging beasts bent on getting some payback for the misery that has been inflicted on them? If you make prison bad enough, you can accomplish that!
And as to women guards in men's facilities, and male guards in women's facilities, and recently T-women with male anatomy being incarcerated in women's facilities - it is only damn fools or those with evil intent who would even consider such arrangements. I've got a notion that idiocy could be traced back to the eructations (or perhaps flatulence) of some [sarc]wise[/sarc] judge in an out-of-control judiciary that was never envisioned to have the power to rule the country.
The latter found a on the deplorable conditions...
What?
Start now making every month extra $19k or more by just doing an easy online job from home. Last month I have earned and received $16650 from this job by giving this only 3 hrs. a day. Every person can now get this job and start earning online by:-.
Follow details: → →salarybitcoinpay.COM
It's probably a vague but symbolic reference to The Scarlet Letter and how the self-righteous guardians of social order were found to have been morally compromised.
Or it typographical error.
What are the odds that Reason did something actually clever with literary prowess vs. somebody probably sneezed while typing ?