Taxpayers Will Pay at Least $600 Million for Tampa Bay's New Baseball Stadium
But will it solve the team's attendance woes? Probably not.

Despite being one of the most dynamic and competitive major league teams for the past 15 years, one thing has quite literally hung over the Tampa Bay Rays: Tropicana Field, the team's ugly and often mostly empty ballpark.
But that shouldn't justify asking taxpayers to foot half the bill for a new home.
Yet it looks like that's what will happen, now that Rays' owner Stuart Sternberg and local government officials have announced an agreement for a new, $1.3 billion stadium where the Rays hope to begin playing by 2028. Though the financial details of the deal remain a bit thin for now, the Tampa Bay Times reports that taxpayers in the city of St. Petersburg and those in Pinellas County (which includes the city) will split the $600 million public contribution to the project.
As Field of Schemes blogger Neil deMause notes, there are still a ton of questions to be answered—including the possibilities of backdoor subsidies like property tax breaks—which won't be fully addressed until the fine print of the deal is made public.
For now, here's what we do know: Plans for the new ballpark call for a fixed dome roof—similar to the one the Rays currently play home games under, though likely without the pesky catwalks that can cause havoc for fielders. Instead of a retractable roof, the stadium will include openable walls and windows that "bring the outside in," the team says.
That's a prudent decision that likely keeps the overall cost of the project down. Still, this is an exorbitantly expensive price tag—one that is likely to increase as it moves along—for a stadium that will seat only about 30,000 people when finished, making it the smallest in Major League Baseball. Ballpark Digest, a blog focused on baseball stadiums, describes the proposal as looking "more like a large arena than a traditional ballpark."
That's perhaps an acknowledgment of the Rays' real problem, which isn't the lack of a shiny new ballpark but an indifferent fan base that's never really embraced the team, despite its remarkable run of low-budget success. The team consistently ranks at or near the bottom of the American League in attendance. Only three times since its inaugural season of 1999 have the Rays drawn an average of over 20,000 fans per game.
Will a new ballpark change that? The Rays shouldn't have to look far for the answer. Their cross-state rivals, the Miami Marlins, similarly struggled with awful attendance figures for most of their first two decades as a major league franchise—despite winning two World Series in that span. The team's owners blamed their ugly, football-first ballpark for the low figures and eventually got a brand-new, baseball-only stadium funded with over $500 million in public cash.
Nothing has changed. Miami drew an average of 27,000 fans in their first season at Marlins Park but has ranked dead last in the National League for attendance in every season since then.
In Tampa, one of the oft-repeated reasons for the Rays' attendance struggles has been the location of Tropicana Field. "Most knowledgeable Tampa Bay residents and baseball fans know Tropicana Field is too far from the population center and the gridlock too tangled for enough fans to see the Rays on a daily basis," Michael Lortz wrote for FanGraphs, a sports blog, in 2017.
The Rays' solution to this problem is a head-scratching one: The new stadium will be built directly adjacent to the team's current home field.
Sports economist Daniel R. Epstein suggests that the Rays' strategy will be to price out fans who want to sit in the cheap seats. "By decreasing the number of seats in the stadium and keeping the park in the same general location, the Rays aren't trying to sell more tickets than they currently do—so they'll make up the difference by increasing the price," he writes in Forbes. "Improving the fan experience in and around the ballpark sounds great—for those who can afford it—but if they aren't interested in packing more fans into the park, they'll surely pursue wealthier ones instead."
So the Rays will trade a difficult-to-access, domed stadium for another difficult-to-access, domed stadium. Taxpayers will be out $600 million (and maybe more), fans who still want to see the team play in person will face higher ticket prices, and the team's attendance woes are likely to continue.
Other than all that, it sounds like a great deal.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I wonder what the team owner's answer would be if any government told them they'd pre-purchase $600M worth of tickets to be distributed by lottery.
“…the Rays aren't trying to sell more tickets than they currently do—so they'll make up the difference by increasing the price,"
Sounds racist.
Raycist, amirite?
Shouldn't the team be forced to move out of a state that is governed by someone CNN called "a hard right extremist, worse than Trump" (aka literal Hitler)?
Maybe to somewhere woke, like Portland?
This one's for Fiona.
https://blockclubchicago.org/2023/09/20/chicago-signs-29-million-contract-to-build-tent-city-base-camps-for-migrants/
Chicago Signs $29 Million Contract To Build Tent City ‘Base Camps’ For Migrants
"The contract did not specify where these “zones” would be located, when they’d be built or how long they’d be in operation. The contract end date is listed as Sept. 12, 2024.
They will house anywhere between 200 to 1,400 people. Monthly operational costs will run between $1.8 million and $5.9 million, according to the contract."
Math makes my head hurt but it looks like windy city taxpayers will be spending 4200.00 per migrant per month not including the cost of the tent city construction. I must be a financial genius because my wife and I live in a 2200 sq. ft. brick ranch on an acre of land with an inground pool and three bathrooms for less than half of that about 90 miles west. Even in Cook County I'm pretty sure you could find a decent place to eat, sleep and shit for a fraction of 4200 bucks a head. But Let's Go Brandon.
It IS the location, more than the ballpark, Eric.
The stadium is in St. Pete. St. Pete is a pain in the ass to get to from where most people live in the Tampa Bay area. Once you get there, it's difficult to navigate. If I'm going to pack the car and haul my family all the way from the mainland side of the bay to this tiny spit of land over there, I want to hit the beach and a restaurant, not a baseball game.
Tampa St Pete is a big enough MSA to support six spring training facilities sports teams (with their rookie/complex league too) and five teams in the Florida League? No wonder they can't draw an MLB crowd too - even if there was a single possible location.
That seems more like a location that would do really well with a sports system like soccer in Europe with promotion/relegation in many leagues/teams but with a single governing body and no team-based extortion of relocation
an indoor baseball game on plastic, under fluorescent lights, in a mausoleum.
But think of all those high paying jobs pouring beer and serving hotdogs!
Seppos just lurvs socialism when it comes to their sports. This is utterly ridiculous. Just find some sportswashing M.E. country - problem solved.
We apparently had good reason to separate.
https://thepostmillennial.com/uk-parliament-sends-letters-to-social-media-platforms-demanding-demonization-of-russell-brand
Your country and culture are utterly lost. You used to be the pinnacle of Western Civilization. Liberal Democracy. The Magna Carta. It's a shame.
Deflection much?
Well, they did have the worst stadium in the majors. I don't see how that is the taxpayers' problem though.
OK, I admit it. DeSantis can't fix everything.
Isn’t a baseball team a profit making Enterprise?
Why Are the taxpayers paying any money for this business?
If the city wants to get into running a profit making enterprise, they would do better to build a marina and shopping complex on the bay.
Why does this particular business get a half a billion subsidy from the city?
I used to dream of visiting a stadium to watch an important sports match, but the older I get, the less attractive the idea seems to me. In addition, now I am interested in sports betting on the betting platform https://in.1xbet.com/ , and watching sports matches online, it is very convenient for me to combine pleasant leisure time and online earnings.