Houston Police Arrested an Animal Rights Protester and Detained Him for 16 Hours, Lawsuit Says
Daraius Dubash was arrested for peacefully protesting in a public park.

Animal rights activists Daraius Dubash and Faraz Harsini were peacefully demonstrating in a Houston, Texas, public park when park employees demanded they leave. When Dubash insisted that the pair had a First Amendment right to protest, officials called the police, who arrested Dubash and charged him with criminal trespass.
While Dubash's charge was eventually dismissed, the pair have now filed a First Amendment lawsuit against the city, arguing that city police clearly violated their Constitutional rights.
"No one should be handcuffed and detained for exercising his First Amendment rights," said JT Morris, an attorney for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a First Amendment nonprofit group. "We're suing because public parks belong to all Americans and their expressive rights, not the personal views of a few."
From April to July 2022, Dubash and Harsini demonstrated several times in Discovery Green, a Houston public park. According to their lawsuit, the pair—keeping in practice with Anonymous for the Voiceless, the animal-rights activist group the two pertained to—wore Guy Fawkes masks while playing clips from Dominion, a documentary showing the gruesome mistreatment of animals in factory farms.
On three separate occasions, park employees asked the pair to leave the park, claiming that the park was private property. (Discovery Green is public property, though it is managed by a private company.) According to the complaint, the pair complied, fearing retaliation.
On July 23, 2022, Dubash and Harsini were approached again. This time, they refused to leave, and Dubash calmly told park employees that he had a right to demonstrate peacefully. However, a park security guard told Dubash that protests were allowed on a "case by case" basis, adding that his "manager is going to come and come look at it."
According to the lawsuit, when the manager, Floyd Willis, arrived, Dubash informed him that, while the park was managed by a private conservancy, the park was still public property, meaning that the First Amendment applied.
"I, we're good with like, if you want to talk to people but, we're not comfortable with the TVs…the content on those," Willis told them.
When Dubash responded that "you still have to abide by the First Amendment because [the park] is publicly owned," Willis responded by saying, "Right. But we also choose, we don't feel the content is appropriate."
Several hours later, park employees returned, this time accompanied by two police officers.
Even after Dubash presented the officers with property records showing that Discovery Green was a public park, the officers insisted that because the park was privately managed, the park employees could still decide what speech was allowed on the grounds.
"If you are showing offensive material he [i.e., Discovery Green management] does not like, you can't be here," one officer told Dubash, adding, "Someone stabbing a goat or cow in the neck to kill them. That seems offensive."
Shortly thereafter, the lawsuit states that Willis told the pair, "We're officially asking you to leave. And as such, if you don't, then it will be a trespass."
"You're the police officer. I've been trained to listen to police officers," Dubash told the officers. "If you ask me to leave, I will leave; I do not want to be arrested. But if you're gonna say I'm fine to be here, I will be here." One of the officers responded it was up to park management to decide.
At that point, Willis announced that "private park security has determined that this is now a criminal trespass," leading the officers to arrest Dubash—even as Dubash told the officers that he would leave immediately rather than face arrest.
The suit states that, after being handcuffed, Dubash was taken to the park's offices, where he was detained for "two to three hours." Eventually, Dubash was taken to a nearby detention facility, where he was held for more than 16 hours before being released, according to the suit.
Police charged Dubash with criminal trespass, though the charge was dismissed less than a week later.
"There is a real and substantial threat of an arrest if they engage in their protected advocacy in Discovery Green based on Mr. Dubash's prior arrest and Discovery Green Conservancy's threat to again exclude them from the park if they display content that management disagrees with," the pair's lawsuit reads. "As a result, Dr. Harsini and Mr. Dubash have suffered and are continuing to suffer irreparable harm to their expressive rights."
Dubash and Harsini's protest is obviously protected by the First Amendment. Even if park patrons—or park staff—are uncomfortable with videos depicting conditions inside factory farms, that doesn't make their speech any less protected.
"Nothing is more powerful than being honest and open with people," said Harsini in a Thursday press release. "And we're standing up for our First Amendment rights that give us that voice."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Houston Police Arrested an Animal Rights Protester and Detained Him for 16 Hours, Lawsuit Says
I’m… reading this headline… isn’t there some rule in journolism where the outrage should… be communicated or transmitted in the headline?
“Area Man arrested, detained for less than a day” is not the kind of thing that makes one think we’ve got a serious systemic problem in our justice system, that is… unless we want to talk about another group of Democracy protesters that had similar or worse treatment? If not, then I think this too-local story can just pipe down a notch or twenty.
“Why do you need to weave that into every conversation”
You mean like how a two-year-old story about Yoel Roth and a certain laptop concludes with “Yeah, but Trump”?
Tthey brought 30+ inch monitors to show their videos. Not sure it they have sound. It's unclear where they were standing or setting up...it's a park not a flea market and their conduct appears to be what vendors do, not protesters. Really depends on the facts. Park probably needs to up it's regulations to prohibit 'vendor' like activity while allowing protests.
Idea: Vendors as protest-like activity.
Nothing being sold. Pipe down with the rhetoric.
did the maker of Dominion sue them yet?
"Someone stabbing a goat or cow in the neck to kill them. That seems offensive." So NOT allowed to show that, or talk about it, in a pubic park? NO offensiveness allowed?
"Someone voting for Trump to stab our democracy in the back, to kill it. That seems offensive."
"Someone voting for Biden to stab our private charity in the back, to kill it, and replace it with Government Almighty charity. AND to mass-murder ALL of our freshly fartilized egg smells! That seems offensive."
I sure hope that this is NOT where we're headed towards!
“Someone stabbing a goat or cow in the neck to kill them.”
Halal or kosher. Halal meat makes great barbacoa.
Roasted goat is the best. Cabrito or die!
Stupid. Go live in a cave.
It's not my fault that you don't appreciate other cultures and their cuisines. Spend some time outside your comfort zone.
Now all reason can do is bait the comment section.
Reason needs to take baiting lessons from Vulgarly-Mad-(Fake)-Vulva-SheMale, who is a MASTER-baiter!
16 hr is way worse than 1 year.
16 hours is definitely worse if you’re sharing a cell with SQRLSY.
Fair.
If I were in a public park with my daughter (or other little kids), and two numb nuts were showing videos of graphic animal cruelty, we'd have an issue. Same with the pro-life guys with the photos of mutilated fetuses on giant posters.
You can have your speech, but it will have consequences.
Weirdo’s have to share their fetishes with everyone, people not liking it is part of the thrill.
If I were in a public park with my daughter (or other little kids), and two numb nuts were showing videos of graphic animal cruelty, we’d have an issue.
Teen and near-teen boys. We'd sit down and be doing our best "All animals were harmed in the making of this video." and "Oh come on! You don't expect us to believe that's real fake pig's blood do you?" Tom Servo/Crow T. Robot impressions.
Maybe even haul out the barbecue and cutting boards and put on a demonstration about prepping meat and cleaning fish.
Go home to your private property. You live in a polity where those are the rules. As they should be.
How can you tell the vegan in the comment group?
1. Don't worry, they will tell you
2. Look for the least knowledgeable idiot. Hi, David Jay.
Knowledge? A deadender prowling a comment section looking to claim he’s smart, like a fourth grade fat bully? You have nothing, you are a clown.
There are hundreds of people in DC held without bail and sentenced to federal prison for non violent protest. Reason hasn't noticed. The big story is some idiot who spent 16 hours locked up in Houston. Classic Reason.
We play in an organized softball league in a 'public' park that is run by a private conservancy, which was set up some 150+ years ago by the gentleman who donated the land. It turns out that they can and do ban people from the park for all sorts of misbehavior.
A few years back, one of our games was disrupted by a bunch of unruly protesters, whose actions (not message) prevented us from being able to use the field that we had reserved and paid for. They were told by a park ranger to leave - the fields, not the park, and when they didn't, the police came and arrested them for criminal trespass. They could have simply moved to a different area of the park that didn't require reservations or permits for use, but refused.
Fuck 'em. I don't know why some people think that being assholes is an effective way to get people to see your point of view. I don't even remember what they were supposed to be protesting.
Kind of like how you lost your way with this dim story. No one cares.
And yet another Emma Camp "according to the plaintiff" special.
Even according to the plaintiffs it sounds like they were being assholes. Despite Emma's claims it sounds like they were trespassing. It is a very local story with a very limited effect. It seems to me that the only reason this story is being covered is due to ideological compassion with the suspects and a flimsy connection to a supposed core principle of this outlet
You have a vivid imagination. Go be a contrarian forensic imaginer of facts in your fantasy baseball. Ridiculous.
They really should just start calling it that.
It just seems FIRE's got a pipeline into Reason.
Nothing to see here. Just another example of the process being the punishment.
So what if it's illegal and immoral, jailing people for charges that will be dismissed is a time-honored pastime of law enforcement.
Why bitch about it now?
Emma, is there any content that cannot be shown to people in public without everybody's expressed permission? Could they show hardcore porn?
Only if they were teachers.
It is odd watching "libertarians" intentionally obliterate their own movement by selling out ALL of their core ideals.
First off, I'm not sympathetic to the activists here. My bias certainly will color my opinion. That said, activist displays are disruptive, obnoxious, and interfere with others going about their business and enjoying a space. I'll say the same thing about right-wing activists.
I'll offer an example I witnessed. A Christian was loudly shouting a fire and brimstone speech (occasionally aided by a speaker) at our downtown walking mall. Individuals first asked him politely to cut it out. Police asked him to put away the speaker (there are regulations in that public space regarding amplified sound.) He argued with them that he had the right to do it. He put away the speaker but continued shouting and engaging in low-level harassment of passers-by. His little display was also blocking and routing people away from the businesses he was standing in front of. The cops came back and told him to move it along or get arrested. He chose to move along.
I don't have a problem with law enforcement shutting down people acting like assholes and disrupting the peace of public spaces. In the specific case presented in the article, it sounds like they were trespassing on private property (just because it is publicly available doesn't mean the managers of the property forfeit rights over it.) They should have left when employees asked them to leave. They should have left when cops told them to leave. They refused. That is trespassing and honestly I don't give a fuck that they sat in a jail for under 24 hours over it.
As another example, I personally have been kicked out of a public national park. I and a few friends were a little buzzed (not drinking in the park) and were playing loud music and games. We gave other park visitors the finger when they told us to cut it out. We tried arguing with park rangers when they told us the same. We were then told to gtfo or the police would get us out. We chose to be kicked out rather than be arrested.
It's funny how Reason consistently chooses to side with the biggest asshole in every situation. It's totally fine for guys to drag in a bunch of tvs to display mutilated animals in a park, but not ok for someone to say the election looked sketchy. Their supposed principles are inconsistent and seems to side with the shittier actors.
Except they’re not assholes, you are. You just used 2 minutes to say your say your aggrandized stupidity, and no one stopped you. Now go back in your cave.
Meanwhile, over at WaPo, Taylor Lorenz 2.0 went ahead and published their hit piece on Dave Portnoy after canceling their interview.
Then they carefully locked their Twitter accounts and boldy bragged about their triumphant article on Twitter.
It…. did not go well.
The community notes cut, sure…. but that ratio…
Just, damn
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1705322338189705308?t=FDmJOErHeI-8i3yH-y1b4A&s=19
And then…….
They went on to claim that he declined their offer of an interview.
That went even worse
https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1705323228724363615?t=hUcyU6FpvmVM0UNKz96U6w&s=19
I'm sad because I can't see the ratio anymore - you need an account to see comments now.
The pronouns make this hard to follow. Is she really trying to rebrand as nonbinary?
They are radical vegan activists who want to ban all animal use by humans. I believe they are emotional fools who don’t understand nature. They deny our nature. That being said, why the hate for protecting first amendment rights? Did you see that they are being represented by FIRE?
Yes. You don’t understand nature. Humans have evolved, read about it.
But why were they protesting in a *park? Were animals being kept there, or were they just being eaten there? One would think a more logical place to protest would be in front of a grocery store or a factory farm.
Government can impose reasonable time, location, and manner restrictions on the exercise of the First Amendment.
Since a park is for recreation and private enjoyment, showing videos of any violence or cruelty is inappropriate. Even shouting or giving a public speech would be inappropriate.
They can stand outside the park and speak.
That’s a great rule for East Germany. This is the United States. Enjoy how it works here.
You can’t even drink in many parks here, the fuck you talking about?
Actually, it's rule in the US. It’s called the “time, place, manner doctrine”, upheld by SCOTUS many times.
The rules behind the Iron Curtain were very different, I assure you.
Oh, I enjoy how it works here.
What I don’t enjoy is ignorant, entitled American pricks like you who talk about totalitarian regimes and have no idea what that means or what liberties you have enjoyed since birth.
Thanks for the Civics class plan. We’re not accepting any applications for substitute teachers this semester here at the middle school.
Go learn something so you don’t have to jump around to show off your feeble understanding to try to get validation. You know very little but seethe a lot.
You're obviously a sock for one of our regular, muted idiots.
Crawl back into the hole you came from, and stop pretending you are a libertarian.
That is true. Every no-borders communo-anarchist is free to walk away to someplace that welcomes and admires arnychists. http://www.sinfest.xyz/view.php?date=2023-09-24
Not sure I understand the ‘libertarian’ perspective here.
Isn’t everything supposed to be fully privatized? There is no such legitimate thing as a public park or public roads. So of course there’s no such thing as 1A rights anywhere. Anyone ‘protesting’ on said private property is subject to whatever the property owner allows in response.
Or is the problem that the police enforcing said private property owner rights are public and therefore are not fully accountable to said owner because of some squishy 1A claims and brouhaha about 18 hour detention and habeas corpus and such. In which case, police should be privatized so that trespassing protesters can be quietly rendered to some private dungeon or kill shelter.
It sounds like you don't understand libertarianism
"It sounds like you don’t understand libertarianism" said the Obama impersonator to the G Waffen Bush impersonator.
"Isn’t everything supposed to be fully privatized?" bah blah blah
Fortunately, we don't all live in the imaginary world inside your head. This article is about the real world where this actually happened. It is a world with both private and public property. And a world in which the State has intervened in private property to the point where those lines of separation are blurred as well.
Correct.
Correct.
Incorrect. 1A rights mean that the government cannot regulate or restrict speech. Nothing changes there. Private property owners always can restrict speech.
Correct. That's the way it works now, and that's the way it works in a libertarian society.
Thanks for correcting the imaginary paper. Go get a job, wannabe-pedant clown. Ridiculous ignorance posing as experience and knowledge.
Did those protesters have a first amendment speaking permit?
Did they pay the full cost of the background check and fingerprinting in order to get the permit?
Did they pay the fees for the permit?
Did they get the required training classes in public speaking required to get the permit?
Where are the details in this story?
Houston Police Arrested an Animal Rights Protester and Detained Him for 16 Hours
How come they aren't doing that in my town?
Flagrant 1st amendment violation.
Also Ironic that the officer literally made the entire point of the protestors. Stabbing a goat, etc., in the neck is indeed offensive, that's the entire point of them showing the video, to make people see the sick reality of where their meat comes from.
So, if I beheaded a goat or cleaned a deer in the same public park do you think Dubash and Harsini would come to my aid or do you think their defense of free speech is one merely of convenience?
No, it's not. It is a permissible "time, place, and manner" restriction. There is ample SCOTUS precedent.
You don't have a right to manipulate people's emotions against their will.
Cleanup on Aisle 6! Back to work.
If you knew what you were talking about, you wouldn’t be writing entry-level misunderstandings here.
Not if it's ruled that the space is privately run. Your space, your rules.
So the government can eliminate free speech by hiring a corporation to do all its censoring? I mean, that's kinda the way the 21st century is working out, but that doesn't make it a good thing, or even legitimate.
Tha Wholly Bauble translation orders God's peeps to go forth and multiply. (Genesis I-22, KJV) Yew cain't add 200,000 Hitlerjugend and Bundesmadschen every day and still mollycoddle a bunch of cloven-hooved, horned goats made in Satan's image. How on God's Green Earth would ewe fatten them gals up for child-rearing and develop them boys into Storm Troopers without BBQ, huh? Remember what Republican President Herbert Hoover said just four years after Jesus won the Monkey Trial: "We are steadily building a new race..."
It's not "their" meat until they buy it.
TOTALLY wrong approach for TEA-xas, especially Houston. To get a pass there the protties needed to wear MAGA caps, cammies and tactical vests, pack ARs, mine the area with propane bottles and spray live ammo at a packing plant. No judge in Grand Goblin Greg's Lone Star Judiciary would hesitate a minute to nol-prosse such brave heroes exercising Second Amendment rights--might even pin a medal on their chests for good measure.
Big deal. They do this to anti-abortion protesters all the time, and everyone is usually like, "GOOD, SCREW THEIR 1A RIGHTS."
Not so fun when the shoe's on the other foot, is it.