Candidates Spar Over National Abortion Ban in First Republican Debate
Plus: Invade Mexico?!, "Trump added $8 trillion to our debt," and more...

Two candidates push back on national abortion ban. At the first debate between Republican candidates vying for the 2024 presidential nomination, two of the eight contenders on stage explicitly rejected the idea of helping pass a national abortion ban if they were elected. Former United Nations Ambassador and South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley rejected it on practical grounds—noting that Republicans simply didn't and wouldn't have the votes in the Senate to actually push such a ban through—and North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum rejected it on principle, asserting that it would be unconstitutional.
"Be honest with the American people…no Republican president can ban abortions," said Haley, pointing out that there wouldn't be enough Senate votes to do it. "Do not make women feel like they have to decide on this issue."
Haley talked about instead finding areas of compromise on reproductive rights and restrictions, including supporting accessible contraception, promoting adoption, banning "late-term abortions," and agreeing "that we are not going to put a woman in jail or give her the death penalty if she gets an abortion."
It was a dodge, to be sure. But Haley had the benefit of realism on her side, correctly noting that a lot of huffing and puffing about passing a federal 15-week ban could make voters feel like it was something they needed to really center when they cast a ballot when, in actuality, a 15-week ban isn't going to happen soon.
Burgum was more explicit about his views. "We should not have a federal abortion ban," said the North Dakota governor, who recently signed a six-week ban into law in his state. The 10th Amendment—that's the one saying "the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"—doesn't allow it, he said.
Burgum pointed out that for decades, the big Republican talking point about abortion was that it should be an issue left up to individual states. "We can't have Republicans say for 50 years to return it to the states and then turn around and push a federal ban."
"The feds are stepping into people's lives and stepping into people's businesses over and over," he added. "If we say the fed should be in this, where do we stop?"
Meanwhile, former Vice President Mike Pence explicitly embraced the idea of a national ban on abortion at 15 weeks of pregnancy. "It's not a states-only issue. It's a moral issue," he said.
South Carolina Sen. Tim Scott echoed Pence's sentiment, saying a Republican president must fight for, "at minimum," a 15-week ban on abortion.
Abortion is an incredibly thorny issue for Republicans at the moment. Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade last summer, American support for legal abortion has only been growing and anti-abortion amendments have been failing even in red states like Kansas and Kentucky. Extreme pro-life rhetoric may still enchant some of the party's base but be a liability when it comes to winning over moderate conservatives, swing voters, and independents, who can no longer minimize this rhetoric as they could when Roe was the law of the land.
Discomfort with how to handle the abortion question seemed apparent among some candidates on stage last night.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis expressed pride about signing a six-week ban into law in Florida, but evaded the question of whether he would urge a national six-week ban. Instead, he launched into a bizarre and apocryphal story about a woman who allegedly survived "multiple abortion attempts."
In general, the candidates seemed more comfortable slinging dubious accusations about Democratic positions on abortion than defining where they stand or think the party should stand.
For instance: Democrats want to allow "abortion all the way up to birth," DeSantis claimed. It's a common refrain among Republicans, conjuring up images of women—and politicians and doctors who support them—who simply decide on a whim late in pregnancy that they'd rather not continue.
But the vast majority of U.S. abortions take place before the end of the first trimester, with just 8 percent occurring after 13 weeks of pregnancy, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Only around 1 percent occur at or after 21 weeks. And when these later-term abortions do occur, it's typically due to pregnancy complications that threaten a mother's life or health or the discovery of issues with the fetus that mean it won't survive full term or outside of the womb, many health professionals say. Besides, the vast majority of states ban abortion after the point of fetal viability, if not sooner. Only seven states (Alaska, Colorado, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, and Vermont) and Washington, D.C., have no specific gestational limit in place.
FREE MINDS
GOP candidates enthusiastic about idiotic idea to invade Mexico. Probably the worst portion of last night's GOP debate came during discussion of border security and drug smuggling, during which multiple candidates on stage pledged U.S. military action in Mexico.
"The cartels are killing tens of thousands of our fellow citizens," DeSantis alleged. "So as president would I use force, would I treat them as foreign terrorist organizations? You're darn right I would."
NEW: DeSantis says he would support sending US special forces across the border into Mexico to combat cartels and target fentanyl labs, etc.
Says he would do it on "day one".— Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) August 24, 2023
DeSantis wasn't the only one on stage who backed using the U.S. military against Mexican cartels, notes The Hill:
On Wednesday night, former Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson said he would support limited military action, such as intelligence gathering, against the cartels. But only if Mexico could be looped into the campaign.
"Cooperation makes a difference," Hutchinson said. "We cannot be successful going against the cartel unless we bring in Mexico as a partner. We have to use economic pressure to accomplish that."
Former Vice President Mike Pence on Wednesday also backed partnering with the Mexican army to "hunt down and destroy the cartels."
Experts, however, say any military action could end up backfiring, straining relations with Mexico and other Latin America countries and likely failing to stop a shadowy network of cartel operations.
Rep. Joaquin Castro (D-Texas), who represents a border state, sharply criticized the GOP candidates for raising the possibility of military action in Mexico.
Republicans have gone from Self Deportation to Build A Wall to Invade Mexico in just over a decade.
— Joaquin Castro (@JoaquinCastrotx) August 24, 2023
Oh! Now they're saying invasion as in WE are going to invade. Yeah, don't do that either. #Cato2024https://t.co/twaEbuGmhH
— A lady (@Anastasia_esq) August 24, 2023
Neither DeSantis nor any other 2024 candidate has the legal authority to order strikes against cartels in Mexico. Candidates need to stop grandstanding and to start offering real and *constitutional* solutions to America's problems.https://t.co/v128wBDrfy
— Katherine Yon Ebright (@EbrightYon) August 24, 2023
FREE MARKETS
They actually talked about cutting spending! One of the first issues addressed at last night's Republican debate was what these presidential candidates had done to cut spending. It was a welcome early foray into something substantive and far-removed from the culture war. The best answer came from Haley, who slammed not just reckless spending by Democrats but by her fellow Republicans, too:
"The truth is that Biden didn't do this to us, our Republicans did this to us too," Haley said during the early moments of Wednesday's Republican primary debate. She pointed specifically to Republican support in Congress for COVID stimulus bills and other recent spending packages. "They need to stop the spending, they need to stop the borrowing, they need to eliminate the earmarks that Republicans brought back in," she said.
Then she delivered the hammer blow: "And Donald Trump added $8 trillion to our debt, and our kids are never going to forgive us for this," Haley said.
More here.
QUICK HITS
• Reason's Jacob Sullum checks in on what former President Donald Trump was doing during last night's debate.
• The Arizona Supreme Court will consider an abortion ban, enacted pre-statehood, that mandates two to five years in prison for abortion providers.
• Sen. Chris Murphy (D–Conn.) embraces "the classic techno moral panic trope that the technology is some sort of brain eating mind control system, creating zombies who have no free will of their own."
• There were no anti-interventionist candidates at the GOP debate.
• "The Florida State Board of Education voted unanimously Wednesday to add harsher penalties to a new law barring transgender students and staff at state colleges from using facilities such as restrooms and locker rooms that are consistent with their gender identity," reports The Hill.
• Eugene Volokh on why we should care about pseudonymity in litigation.
• Hawaii Gov. Josh Green is "suspending whole sections of state and local laws and regulations that relate to homebuilding."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Two candidates push back on national abortion ban.
They left us too soon.
in fairness, they never really had a shot
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning 16,000 US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
ENB is disingenuous as fuck. She must be angry that her escort business never took off.
Haley didn't dodge the question. She spoke truth to a hostile audience. That's the opposite of dodging.
And ENB shows how to dodge a question with her "most abortions happen early" line. That doesn't change the fact that Democrats want abortion legal up until the baby leaves the hospital.
Way to fall for stupid propaganda. Many of these new 6week or similar abortion bans also provide exceptions for when the life of the mother is at risk and/or fetal viability is impossible. Which could happen at 6wks, 15weeks, 7months…etc. Are the people who support the 6week ban with these exceptions lumped in with your fake people who “want abortions legal up until the baby leaves the hospital?” For fucks sake use your brain for a single second.
I swear you idiots won’t be happy until both the nonviable fetus and mother both leave the hospital in a body bag whilst touting how ‘pro life’ you are.
Lol, propaganda?
You guys just tried to pass a law explicitly calling for abortion until birth.
Who do you think you're actually tricking... and quit sockpuppeting for fuck's sake Shrike.
"You guys just tried to pass a law explicitly calling for abortion until birth."
If you're being honest, you have to admit that's the only way to stop the zealots from pushing back any reasonable standard. Look what happened with viability, the most clear, scientific, and reasonable point to start a ban.
“We have to kill babies at birth to prove the zealots right!”
"If you’re being honest, you have to admit that’s the only way to stop the zealots"
Absolutely, just like killing toddlers is the only way to stop them opposing contraception too, right?
Do you realize how psychopathic you sound? Motherfucker.
And you're calling them zealots...
I don't support abortion up until live borth, so I don't know why you are claiming I do. Maybe because you are one of the zealots?
I merely pointed out that the extreme anti-abortion forces reject the most sensible, reasonable, and logical point to start a ban (viability) and keep pushing more and more irrational standards.
When you push a "heartbeat" bill that kicks in before a fetus even has a heart, you are living in the land of make-believe. And not the good kind that Mr. Rogers had.
“That doesn’t change the fact that Democrats want abortion legal up until the baby leaves the hospital.”
When somebody says this it’s fucking obvious to anyone with half a brain and a quarter understanding of the debate that they are talking about elective abortions.
Please stop “helping” the pro-choice side.
Not true. The definitions in the laws are such that no physician will dare risk prosecution for saving a woman's life.
That's what Ayn Rand told the rabid Reaganites. Statistics before and after the Court adopted the 1972 Libertarian plank demand for repeal of all laws forcing women to remain knocked up during the first 100 days show a CLEARLY VISIBLE drop in women dying in childbed. Pro-life means ending deadly rights-destroying compulsion. Orange Hitler's Lebensborn court-packing will hopefully end girl-murdering Prohibition party influence in These States forever. Good riddance!
1% of abortions is 12,000 abortions a year, which is higher than the homicide rate a year.
But those 1% are done for medical reasons and are often a tragedy.
Pete Buttigieg spoke on the heart and better than most politician can.
"So, let's put ourselves in the shoes of a woman in that situation. If it's that late in your pregnancy, that means almost by definition you've been expecting to carry it to term,” Buttigieg continued. “We’re talking about women who have perhaps chosen the name, women who have purchased the crib, families that then get the most devastating medical news of their lifetime, something about the health or the life of the mother that forces them to make an impossible, unthinkable choice. That decision is not going to be made any better, medically or morally, because the government is dictating how that decision should be made.”
Well this is a lie and an appeal to authority/emotion that is useless.
No lie. There are women who need abortions. Ectopic pregnancies are more common than people realize. Later term abortions are rarely medically necessary but they do happen. Once in my wife's career as a physician she had to refer s patient for one. My own health system will perform medically necessary abortions even in the third trimester and that is a good thing.
And you are no authority but an ignoramus who is proud of that fact.
You calling anyone an ignoramus, is almost as funny as Tony doing it. Almost.
>>Pete Buttigieg spoke on the heart and better than most politician can.
find an authority to appeal to next time
Homicide is the killing of constitutional persons. If a woman interrupts a pregnancy that is not homicide. Jurisdiction matters too. If a pregnancy is terminated in Mexico or Canada, only the Mises Caucus thinks men with guns should invade to force a different outcome. The USA has no more jurisdiction to meddle within a woman than within a foreign State.
...multiple candidates on stage pledged U.S. military action in Mexico.
Look, the military contractors need fed, and if you're going to pretend to end foreign entanglements you have to entertain starting some local ones.
National police and reeducation camps. Duh.
They actually talked about cutting spending!
Talk is the cheapest thing a Republican administration has to offer taxpayers.
But cutting government spending is violence!
So they threw grandma off a cliff?
Talk is the
cheapestonly thing a Republican administration has to offer to taxpayers (or their children or grandchildren)."They actually talked about cutting spending!"
They often do, but they never follow through.
Or they claim that their supply-side boondoggles will save twice as much (spoiler: they never save anything), so they are justified in spending half of those "savings".
Republicans haven't actually supported fiscal responsibility since Bush (the father) accurately called supply-side economics "voodoo economics".
And Donald Trump added $8 trillion to our debt, and our kids are never going to forgive us for this...
They will have paid for his ouster.
Looks like Reason has adopted the Buttplug narrative on this. Pelosi and the Democrats controlling the house apparently aren't responsible for the bills.
Congress has no role in budgets. States never shut down for covid.
"The truth is that Biden didn't do this to us, our Republicans did this to us too," Haley said during the early moments of Wednesday's Republican primary debate.
Here's an accidental advertisement for what the National Debt has bought us for Edu-ma-kay-shun. This sentence should read:
"The truth is that Biden didn't do this to usexclusively, our Republicans did this to us too," Haley said during the early moments of Wednesday's Republican primary debate.
Please think and write as good as you look, Darling Nicky.
🙂
😉
SSorry, I mean Nikki.
Visions of hotel lobbies keep dancing in my head to the point of distraction for my spelling.
🙂
😉
Summary of Reason in the last 72 hours: Republicans bad!
That is all.
That, and they love the GOPe with Nikki Haley.
Rich Uncle Charles has picked his candidate.
Reason will remain corrupt until all Koch money is gone.
They praised Haley as they prop up the GOPe.
Killing the unborn is more important than not blowing up kids all over the world.
You can't kill something that has a 0% chance of survival outside the womb.
Whoosh!
What a substantive reply. You're very convincing.
So sad that they report on the state of Republicans huh?
Somehow, Jeffy, you missed Bob's point so totally and completely, it is a wonder to behold how dumb you really are.
If Republicans don't want Reason to notice they suck, they shouldn't hold a debate for all their primary candidates.
[Disclaimer: This would be a both sides. A Democratic debate would reveal that Democrats suck, too, but there isn't a Democratic debate.]
This is just becoming pathetic. When do you make these comments criticizing democrats and then couch it as a both sides? You never do that.
Nobody buys your bullshit Mike. I could pull up 15 reason articles critical of dems and see maybe one post of yours even tepidly critical. I would find more critical of the right even in those articles.
Altruist looters are not good at inference. Libertarian policies are good because they avoid the initiation of deadly force. Kleptocracy policy--whether Christian Hitlerite or Chicom imported as unequal yet apposite reprisal against nationalsocialist aggression--require the initiation of deadly force. Death-seeking is inherent in DemoGOP policies, yet both factions cling to it. What does that say about their standard of value?
"For instance: Democrats want to allow "abortion all the way up to birth," DeSantis claimed. It's a common refrain among Republicans"
...a refrain that is backed up by Democrats constantly pushing for no-limits abortion.
Sorry ENB, maybe if your people didn't push for absurd and immoral policies, they wouldn't have as much of a problem. But gaslighting that this is just a Republican talking point misses the fact that its also absolutely true
And in truth, I really am sick of all the gaslighting.
No you’re not. You told me just yesterday that you loved it!
What is hilarious is that this is the exact narrative pushed by Psaki last night.
are we surprised that ENB gets her talking points from recycled MSNBC/CNN/NYT? I mean, she shows us pretty much every day that she is a bog standard leftist
When their position is no restrictions ever, that common refrain is accurate.
What was the week-limit on the state law the left was trying to overturn, that got Roe overturned instead? Something like 15-22, IIRC?
I believe Dobbs was 15
Dems even sued against 20 week bills. Enb is just lying. They voted AGAINST the born alive bill.
You have to play strong defence against zealots who want to steal rights in the name of "morality".
Republicans: "WON'T ANYONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN!!!"*
*Until birth. After that, fuck 'em.
Pretty sure it’s your leaders fucking all the kids.
Epstein didn't kill himself, and Maxwell got convicted of trafficking children to no one at all. Odd.
I split my ticket, so I'm not sure who my "leaders" are.
I vote on an issue profile that prioritizes individual liberty, fiscal responsibility, small businesses, and limited government. How about you?
Per the Post, that's part of the Democratic platform.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/08/23/abortion-democratic-position-rfk/
"That puts him right in line with today’s Democratic Party, in which support for legal abortion at any stage of pregnancy is a nearly unchallenged orthodoxy."
So, a common Republican refrain...backed up by everything the democrats have both done, and been recorded saying/writing non-stop.
The problem isn't so much that it's actually true; the problem is that the Republicans are able to use it as a cudgel against the Left.
What kind of jackass thinks someone is getting an abortion up to birth for fun?
No woman is carrying around a fetus for near 10 months and then going "oh no, I don't want it now."
It's for medical emergencies and such. How fucking stupid can you be?
Emergencies are often exceptions to the rule. Like mail in ballots during a pandemic.
And wouldn't it be wonderful if the government stayed out of it, and let the mother and her doctor decide what to do.
My doctor and I just agreed to kill you, guess the government should stay out of it.*
*To whatever fed is reading this, I’m not really going to kill Dee.
But your doctor might. After all, Mike is just a clump of cells.
"My doctor and I just agreed to kill you, guess the government should stay out of it."
You and your doctor should be allowed to decide whether or not to kill you. The government should definitely stay out of that.
Murder, on the other hand ...
It’s not my fault you’re dense.
Non-snarky question: why “and her doctor”, if this is about women’s bodily autonomy?
I’m fine with a doctor not wanting to do the procedure personally, and telling her to go elsewhere, but on a purely elective abortion I don’t think the doctor has anything to do with the decision.
Can I gently suggest that you don’t really think the doctor has much do with it? Instead, you’re just trying to medicalize a personal value judgment and leverage off people’s respect for the profession. Again, I’m pro-choice but tired of insincere arguments.
No, of course, as you said, it is the woman's decision and the doctor is in the role of advisor. Sorry for being imprecise.
Fair enough, sorry that I thought it was intentional. There's a lot of people invoking medicine as authority when the disagreement is really about values. Abortion, gender, Covid, guns, .....
It was definitely intentional with Mike.
"Non-snarky question: why “and her doctor”, if this is about women’s bodily autonomy?"
Ethical doctors are a source of accurate medical information to their patients, which helps in medical decision-making. They are an integral part of medical decision-making.
The disinformation from crisis pregnancy centers count on this to manipulate their victims every day.
"Can I gently suggest that you don’t really think the doctor has much do with it?"
I disagree with this take. Abortion has medical/psychological downsides that an honest, nonjudgemental discussion with a doctor could bring to light for a patient. Assuming the doctor isn't trying to mislead their patient (see: crisis pregnancy centers), that information is just as likely to reverse the decision to have an abortion as reinforce it.
Would it be wrong to guess that you’d still oppose a law that (a) only applied in the 9th month, and (b) explicitly exempted medical emergencies?
People argue (correctly) that late abortions are 1%, but when a law targeting only that 1% is proposed there’s plenty of wailing that it’s an abortion ban, the clinics will have to close, and “thousands” of women will turn into fugitives. We never hear news stories that spin it as “State X plans to ban less than 1% of abortions”.
I’m mostly pro-choice but I get pissed off at disingeneous motte-and-bailey arguments.
What kind of jackass thinks someone is getting an abortion up to birth for fun?
What kind of jackass thinks abortion up to birth is supported by the majority of Americans? Just because you believe an 8.5-month pregnancy should be terminated if the mother suddenly doesn't feel like having it, doesn't mean it's popular.
His point was that almost every single abortion at 8.5 months isn't a case of "the mother suddenly doesn’t feel like having" a baby.
This is one of the weakest arguments by the anti-abortion crowd (although there's fierce competition with all of the others). Elective, non-medically-necessary abortions in the third trimester are almost non-existent. It's a red herring.
“almost every single abortion”
It’s a start, but I’m not getting my hopes up.
"It’s for medical emergencies "
There is no medical emergency that merits termination at that point. The child is viable, the treatment for any such emergency would be emergency delivery and treating the mother, which is able to be done successfully and in near zero circumstances necessitates the baby dying.
Dont talk about stuff you dont know about, media matters talking points that 20 year old activists will mislead you into believing objectively false shit
(Trying again. Apparently, I can’t post a link without commentary.)
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10426234/
This is from 1999, Laursen. Medicine helping viability of the baby at that stage has advanced. You have anything more recent?
Also they listed plenty of conditions that are viable. Trisomy 13 and 18 suck, but arent necessarily lethal. If they made it that far past miscarriage they are likely viable.
You can have a conversation about how much eugenics you want, but this isnt a case of "the baby wasn't viable"
I'll remind you of your starting claim in this thread of conversation: "There is no medical emergency that merits termination at that point."
and ill remind you, there isnt
The treatment of a medical emergency is 100% to deliver the baby. You dont need kill the baby and then deliver it. You can just deliver it. At 7 months the baby will have a good chance in the NICU, at 8 they will have a good chance with minimal support, at 8.5-9 they would be just fine period.
The point is DELIVERY is the treatment for threat to life of the mother or the child.
"at 8.5-9 they would be just fine"
Except, in many cases, for the rest of their short, miserable life.
As I said above, at that point the argument is how much eugenics you want to partake in.
The kid is a living, heart beating, breathing thing (even if air isnt in the lungs yet, they are still actually using the muscles to practice breathing).
If you are cool killing one kid because "trust me bro, they will have a bad life" where is the line? This kind of thing can get messy quick and you are no longer in the "should we have abortion or not" category anymore and very much in the "so what traits are desirable enough to earn the baby a trip through the birth canal".
As a backdrop, people on the left have argued kids that are perfectly healthy and are poor, hungry, or end up in foster care may have been better off dead. So this is not an exaggerated slippery slope at all, its what people think, today, right now.
Outside of rare conditions, people either prioritize the life of the baby or the imposition on the mother.
I’m not killing anyone. I’m for minding one’s own business and butting out of a mother’s decision about whether to have a baby with severe medical problems. Butting out of other people’s lives is what libertarianism is about.
I’m sure you and all the other buttinskies will stay involved after these children are born, helping to care for them.
"I’m for minding one’s own business and butting out "
Ya, we all have come to an agreement in society that we will protect kids and certain other standards.
Would you have been a buttinsky during the holocaust? Or hey, these people just have a beef with these others, let them decide what they do.
How about a parent who wants to fuck their kid, and a kid who is convinced that they also want to fuck that parent? Should the state intervene, or would that be too "buttinsky"?
What if another parent down the street decided they like drugs, so why not get their kids on meth early? Any intervention, or too buttinsky?
also, id like to add that Im pretty sure you changed your tune to "well im not making any judgements myself, im just butting out" because you understand how much of a slippery slope this is and what it would lead to.
Democrats, in today's world, this year, have argued that foster kids and kids that have a shitty life might have been better off aborted. That isnt hyperbole or demagoguing, that is literally what they suggested. We aren't considering a hypothetical slippery slope, we are at the top, with a greased up toboggan, and the progressives are trying everything they can to rocket on down.
I personally am for the ol safe, legal, and rare. But the left has perverted itself and jumped the shark on this. They dont want that. And if I have to choose between "no abortion for anyone unless mom is dying" or "abortions for everyone, anytime" im definitely picking the former. Im not religious at all, but the latter is just evil
Well, take up your argument with the left. I’m not part of the left.
Some aspects of life are inherently messy, and will never have perfect, tidy solutions: abortion is one of them. I want to butt out of such deeply personal decisions.
Five minutes of Democrats supporting abortion up until birth:
https://twitter.com/DeSantisWarRoom/status/1694714509892649412
Judaism actually requires an abortion of a woman in labor if it is necessary to save her life. Today that would never happen but in the past it was a real thing.
Waiting for the anti-Semites in 3...2...1....
ENB's is actually the constitutionally and morally correct position. This is for the same reason that it is constitutionally correct for These States to stay out of wars between looter factions killing men, women and children OUTSIDE our jurisdictional borders. Lindbergh pointed this out when the GOP was supporting Hitler and the Dems opposing that Jew-killing religious fanatic. A pregnant woman is a legal individual, fugitive slave laws in Confederate Texas to the contrary notwithstanding. See Jon on abortion (https://bit.ly/3A2K6wi)
Reason's Jacob Sullum checks in on what former President Donald Trump was doing during last night's debate.
We got the least biased against Trump to pen this check-in.
https://babylonbee.com/news/republicans-debate-to-see-whos-going-to-lose-to-biden-in-a-landslide-mail-in-vote-in-middle-of-night
"And Donald Trump added $8 trillion to our debt, and our kids are never going to forgive us for this," Haley said.
Nikki girl, you cannot tell the truth and win the GOP nomination. That ain't the way the GOP rolls.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Fortunately for you and her, she probably has no intention of telling the truth.
It's not expected of career politicians.
There were no anti-interventionist candidates at the GOP debate.
The closest you get was avoiding the stage.
By Reason’s conception, shouting “No. Stop!” and holding up your hands to prevent someone from stabbing you to death makes you a “both sides” interventionist.
Actually, a televangelist puppet who brags about exposing women to the violence of Army Of God doctor-killers, clinic machine-gunners, arsonists and economy-wrecking meddlers in the affairs of others is as interventionist as Bin Ladin's superstitious hijacker buddies. Is Fisting sockie here really Robert Dear typing from the Colorado State Home for the Bewildered?
GOP candidates enthusiastic about idiotic idea to invade Mexico.
Their war boner is aging. May need a little blue pill for full satisfaction.
Are they actually going to “invade” Mexico, Pluggo?
What did they say?
turd posted it; it's a lie.
turd lies. turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
You were banned for posting links to child pornography.
Sorry, the war boner belongs to your ass master Soros and his Dem allies.
Pooor widdle Wepubwicans. When Rockefeller subsidized the Prohibition Party, GOP quickly meant God's Own Prohibitionists, and the crybabies actually managed to get control the Kleptocracy now and then by adopting the whack-job plank at the cost of freedom and the economy. Now instead of letting go of book-burning Comstockism and adopting the Libertarian plank, mystical looters instead choose the initiation of deadly force against the weaker sex. Sooo silly, sooo solly.
"Hawaii Gov. Josh Green is "suspending whole sections of state and local laws and regulations that relate to homebuilding.""
For large corporate (donor-class) developers only.
Going to be very interesting to see how many of the conspiracy theories on this turn out to be true.
I think if corporate developers try to build in the historic towns (or parts of towns like Front Street in Lahaina) the shit will hit the fan pretty quickly. There are areas of Lahaina that have corporate development and tourist-oriented resort hotels that those types of companies can rebuild in.
You should read the original press release and the Reason article mentioned above, and then try to discern if it could possibly apply to anyone but large-scale corporate developers.
I've worked in the design and construction industry for 20 years, if you want my take on it.
It would break my heart if the historic areas of Lahaina were developed like the cookie-cutter, tourist-centric parts are. It was one of my favorite places in the world and if, in the rebuilding process, it lost all that character to some bland, mass-market, tourist-resort development company it would be a great loss.
The trend continues. Jobs revised down over 300k from projections. Biden's admin has had near 100% revisement down of every projection.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/another-downward-revision-bls-confirms-us-payrolls-least-306000-lower-previously-reported
But it’s just a mistake, every single month.
— Jeffdeesarc
Koch brother found to have worked with Fox to put employee and political member if DeSantis onto Fox voter panel.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/busted-fox-news-and-martha-maccallum-caught-presenting-koch-brothers-activist-fake-desantis
English, please.
Charles Koch, owner of Reason, is supporting the GOPe using Fox News and astroturfing.
In the article. Koch is astroturfing.
They planted a Koch-employed NGO activist in a "townhall" audience and introduced him as a typical Wisconsin voter without mentioning that he is in fact a highly paid political operative.
The Florida State Board of Education voted unanimously Wednesday to add harsher penalties to a new law barring transgender students and staff at state colleges from using facilities such as restrooms and locker rooms that are consistent with their gender identity...
In my day I could swing my dick around all through the ladies locker rooms, consequence-free. Now it sounds like I'd get in trouble. What is this world coming to.
Origin story of how you met Mrs Etiquette?
SHE WISHES.
But masks work!
In a recently obtained letter (pdf) sent in November 2021 to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), top epidemiologist Michael Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, and seven colleagues informed the agency it was promoting flawed data and excluding data that did not reinforce their narrative.
.
The letter warned the agency that misrepresenting data on trusted websites such as the CDC and the COVID-19 Real-Time Learning Network—jointly created by the CDC and Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)—would “damage the credibility of science,” endanger public trust by “misrepresenting the evidence,” and give the public “false expectations” masking would protect them from the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID-19.
.
“We believe the information and recommendations as provided may actually put an individual at increased risk of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 and for them to experience a serious or even life-threatening infection,” Mr. Osterhom wrote.
.
The authors urged the IDSA to remove the suggestion that masking prevents severe disease from its website and asked the CDC to reconsider its statements about the “efficacy of masks and face coverings for preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/secret-letter-cdc-top-epidemiologist-suggests-agency-misrepresented-scientific-data
masks are absolutely the quintessential "DO SOMETHING!" and "WE CARE (tm)!" of govt COVID responses
Yeah, crossed with a little bit of some 'just wear the armband'.
If I don't wear a mask, how will people know I'm not some sort of icky republican?
Masks were instantly ubiquitous when the Spanish Flu hit in October 1918. The reaction was the same then as now, with the out-of-power looters claiming they'd've handled everything swimingly. Yawn...
“We believe the information and recommendations as provided may actually put an individual at increased risk of becoming infected with SARS-CoV-2 and for them to experience a serious or even life-threatening infection,” Mr. Osterhom wrote.
As a regular reader of Reason comments, you might be wondering how this information can be parsed to respond to those who are anxious about catching COVID. Here is an analogy you might provide:
“If you are at high risk for bear attacks, for example, if you are obese and slow and always seem to have cookie crumbs in the folds of your clothes or “Cheeto fingers”, then travel to zoos, nature preserves or remote wildness areas is highly discouraged. If you are afraid that someone travelling from such an area has allowed a bear access to their vehicle and that the bear could potentially escape from the trunk as they drive around and maul you, the most reasonable solution would be for you to stay inside your house where you have assurance there are no bears. Meanwhile, relying on the government to set up checkpoints for police to search vehicles for bears is an incredibly inefficient waste of resources with no guarantee that it will catch every bear.”
LMAO, classic.
"for example, if you are obese and slow and always seem to have cookie crumbs in the folds of your clothes or “Cheeto fingers”"
That sounds like some hardcore lived-truth
Poor Lying Jeffy.
I just loved the media bobbleheads sperging about how "masks work" in the same manner as "four legs good, two legs bad."
DHS is literally welding border walls to remain open. Openings designed to help alleviate monsoon flooding but the Biden administration welded them open so they can't be shut again.
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/biden-regime-welds-open-floodgates-arizona-border-allowing-illegal-aliens-pour-us
Well, someone has to take all those good-paying union jobs.
Again, they aren’t "open borders." They are just welding a border open, but they definitely aren’t "open borders."
US officials have inexplicably welded open 114 massive gates along the Arizona border to allow water to flow freely during the annual monsoon season and for the migration of an endangered species of antelope, officials said.
Is this something they do every year?
They generally open them only around big storms. Flash floods will throw lots of debris around the walls if they don't. They are generally open for a day or two between spurts.
The Southwest just had its worst summer storm in generations.
Generations of paramecia?
and for the migration of an endangered species of antelope,
And, of course, people that identify as antelope.
And here I thought they usually identified as coyotes.
I mean, it was racist to call them 'coyotes' (even though that's a Mexican term) and now we want to call them 'antelopes'?
Just don't call them human traffickers.
Four articles from Zerohedge in one thread? What, did your subscription to TinFoilHat.com lapse?
Neat how you always waltz into the comments hours or days later, when nobody is around to debate your stupidity.
“Neat how you always waltz into the comments hours or days later”
I often have things in my life that make commenting here impossible, especially on weekends when the rescue is often busy.
Also, claiming that commenting hours after someone else’s post is unusual is … weird.
Where do I go for a candidate who wants to cut the deficit, doesn’t want to pass nationwide abortion laws, doesn’t want to destroy the market with ESG, doesn’t want to use global financial institutions to serve as thought police, doesn’t want to write a blank check to Ukraine, and doesn’t want to bomb cartels in Mexico?
Can I not get one candidate to vote for?
Most of the candidates last night didn’t agree with nationwide abortion laws…. they fought to make it a state concern. Believe it was just pence and forget the other.
Vivek was strong against most of what you asked for.
And be clear on cut the deficit. Do you mean raise taxes?
Fuck you, cut spending.
Then say cut spending. Because the democrats and people like Mike and Jeff claim deficits can only be cut through taxation.
That is why I pointed it out. Democrats constantly state they want to cut deficits through taxation.
And again most of them last night talked about cutting spending.
Jesse, you repeat yourself.
the democrats and people like Mike and Jeff
I've yet to see evidence that Mike and Jeff aren't Democrats.
I know. Was intentional.
Mike even had the temerity to claim he doesn't lean left on Sunday.
I hate having to agree with you, but I do. Mike, Jeff, and Nige are three of the most liberal commenters here. Both fiscally and culturally.
What is your stance on boots being worn as hats? Might have a candidate for you.
Take your choice.
https://pattyforliberty.com/2024-libertarian-presidential-candidates/
Ugh. They included Chase Oliver who is a dem media darling.
Being a dem media darling is a serious offense. But other than that, you got anything against him?
I haven’t looked at his platform since 2022, but he was a bumper sticker idealism pushing candidate with no actual policies that would be effective in government. Worse than Amash whose entire accomplishment was naming 3 post offices. A candidate who will impart zero change is a useless candidate.
All the signs were there in 2022 that he ran as a vanity project and a spoiler as well, not due to any realistic ideals.
At least people like Massie realize one step is better than no steps even if it isn't the end goal. Chase had none of that during his campaign. His entire goal was to effect an election.
Amash: the most basic responsibility of a Congressman is to vote against bad bills and vote in favor of good ones, and I feel like he did that pretty well. Wanted him to be the nominee in 2020.
If Chase Oliver is the LP nominee and the other choices are Trump and Biden, then I’m voting for Chase. I tend to agree he’s just a guy with some nice ideals, not many specifics, and no other qualifications or accomplishments. That’s still way better than those other two choices.
If Justin Amash is the LP nominee, I’ll be voting for him even if the R’s and D’s get their acts together and nominate candidates with intact brains, decent life expectancies, and clean legal records. He's got solid principles, speaks well, has won actual elections, and has the demeanor and sense of responsibility to be POTUS.
It seems ironic at first glance.
https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/08/24/alice-coopers-rocknroll-revolt-against-trans-ideology/
Is the tide finally turning on trans? It can often feel as if every public figure is toeing the woke line, with any dissenting view crushed by cancel culture. Even those rock stars who think of themselves as rebellious, from Billy Bragg to Neil Young, have become boringly conformist. Thank God, then, for Alice Cooper.
Cooper was especially sceptical about the growing number of kids who identify as trans. ‘I’m understanding that there are cases of transgender [children], but I’m afraid that it’s also a fad’, he said. ‘I find it wrong when you’ve got a six-year-old kid who has no idea. He just wants to play and you’re confusing him [by] telling him, “Yeah, you’re a boy, but you could be a girl if you want to be”.’
Cooper went on to talk about how bewildering it must be for children and young people to grow up under the shadow of trans ideology, while still struggling to work out their own identities. ‘Let somebody at least become sexually aware of who they are, before they start thinking about if they’re a boy or a girl’, Cooper said. In other words, as fellow rockers Pink Floyd once said: ‘Leave those kids alone.’
Cooper also touched on the threats trans ideology poses to women’s rights and single-sex spaces: ‘A guy can walk into a woman’s bathroom at any time and just say, “I just feel like I’m a woman today”, and have the time of his life in there.’ Unfortunately, this is now a very real concern for many women. Predatory men have been given a green light to enter women’s private spaces, and women who push back will be branded as bigots. ‘Where do you draw this line?’, Cooper rightly asked.
Only Women Bleed.
"For instance: Democrats want to allow "abortion all the way up to birth," DeSantis claimed. It's a common refrain among Republicans, conjuring up images of women—and politicians and doctors who support them—who simply decide on a whim late in pregnancy that they'd rather not continue.
But the vast majority of U.S. abortions take place before the end of the first trimester, with just 8 percent occurring after 13 weeks of pregnancy, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention."
Irrelevant. Democrats WANT it without limits. They have passed such legislation in states. Virginia Dems also wanted to do that.
Just because most aren't done late term does not, in any way, discount what the Dems ultimately want.
46 Dems in congress voted for no limits. Enb is just a liar.
So is Jen Psaki. They're trying to gaslight everyone on it.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/psaki-torn-apart-for-claiming-no-one-supports-abortion-through-birth-you-worked-for-the-man-who-does/ar-AA1fHPqT
Psaki wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter, responded to pro-life Republican candidates, claiming, "No one supports abortion up until birth."
"X, formerly known as Twitter"
I wonder when they are going to stop doing this.
Without Zoomers there to call them Boomers for doing it interminably, who knows?
OK, that's it. No more adding the phrase "formerly known as Twitter" when discussing X. Deadnaming is an evil thing only done by fascists.
Use the preferred name or shut up and go home!
But is this like a Prince wanting to be called The Artist formely known as Prince? Think Reason needs to put a crack team of
investigtorsinterns on the case.Prince, formerly known as The Artist Formerly Known As Prince?
The Currently Decomposing Artist, Prince, formerly known as The Artist Formerly Known As Prince.
Hawaii Gov. Josh Green is "suspending whole sections of state and local laws and regulations that relate to homebuilding."
Ha, but we can't live without them otherwise.
BEE PROPHECY FULFILLED: New York Times publishes op-ed titled "Elections Are Bad for Democracy"
How long until Mike and sarc push the narrative? Guessing 2 months.
I laughed my ass off reading this:
Let’s play a game.
I’m going to post a snippet from either the NYT’s story or The Bee’s story, and you have to guess whether its the Wharton psychologist Adam Grant or The Bee that wrote it.
Ready? Try to guess which quotes are from The Bee.
…if we want public office to have integrity, we might be better off eliminating elections altogether.
We can’t let democracy get in the way and ruin our perfect democracy.
If we let everyone in the country legally vote to choose the nation’s leadership, democracy itself may be lost forever.
“Systematically selected leaders can undermine group goals”
“It’s unfathomable that the American people would allow such egregious destruction of our country’s democratic foundations by allowing the majority of elected representatives to represent them through legislative action.”
…no voting also means no boundaries to gerrymander and no Electoral College to dispute.
Without looking at either, I'm going to guess that those are all from NYT.
I won't give away the answers, but half were written by NYT.
Democracy is much too important to let regular people interfere.
they are coming just short of admitting "if you fucking peons would shut the hell up and stop interfering with our planning of society, things would go a lot smoother"
This is why they come out against populism so much. They absolutely hate the idea of the unwashed having any kind of say as to what the elite enlightened do.
Disobey and live.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4166222-maui-residents-who-disobeyed-barricade-survived-fires-ap-reports/
Those who disobeyed the barricaded road closures during the Maui fires survived the disaster, while many of those who heeded orders to turn around perished in their cars and homes with no way out, The Associated Press reported.
In the early hours of the Maui fires, there were more than 30 power poles downed alongside the Honoapiilani Highway at the south end of Lahaina — a historic town that was decimated in the fires earlier this month. Officials closed Lahaina Bypass Road due to the fires, blocking the only way out of Lahaina to the southern part of the island.
One family swerved around the barricade set up to escape the flames, while another resident took a dirt road uphill to climb above the fire, according to the AP. However, many others who stayed in the cars on that road were stuck in a gridlock, with fires surrounding them on most sides with the ocean on the remaining side.
Disobey and live.
This is the way.
The COVID plan.
I wish more people would've disobeyed the COVID plan. I still see people alone in cars wearing masks. Most have CA or WA plates on their rigs.
Here, locally, near Chicago in Illinois, I noticed that mask wearing was near universal in Chicago (even alone in cars), and dropped off a bit in Cook County. When you got to the collar counties (Lake, McHenry, Kane, DuPage, and Will), compliance dropped off to about 50%, with the more rural sections probably at about 25% compliance. Downstate largely told the governor to take a long walk off a very short pier.
The ones I see in my area are almost exclusively white women driving decently nice cars in the close suburbs.
AKA Affluent White Female Liberals.
This shit.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/02/05/is-it-safe-to-attend-a-large-wedding-during-covid-tips-for-guests.html
Arizona has a Democratic Attorney General today because fewer Republicans got vaccinated or wore masks.
And, most assuredly, no one who gave the orders will stand trial.
Nuremberg Trials need a serious reboot.
Local news. Why would a nominally libritarian sight care about massive goverment incompetence and corruption
Not to be Glib, but it is definitely too local.
I do feel like I’m missing out on the goings-on in Marion County Kansas, though.
Well 1A created a special class of citizens, journalists. When one of them is inconvenienced democracy starts dying in the darkness. On the other hand if you were half a mile from the capitol on J6 you can fuck right off.
"Sen. Chris Murphy (D–Conn.) embraces "the classic techno moral panic trope that the technology is some sort of brain eating mind control system, creating zombies who have no free will of their own.""
Strange. Seems that would fit right in with the Democrat's program.
I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of Buttplugs cried out in terror and were suddenly silenced.
"Politicians & George Soros-funded NGOs say "hate incidents" are rising, but they're not. The data show the opposite: higher-than-ever and rising levels of tolerance of minorities. The reason they're spreading hate misinformation is to justify a draconian crackdown on free speech."
Exactly.
X will be filing legal action to stop this. Can’t wait for discovery to start!
Soros will start paying for training in race assault hoaxes to fix it.
With an annual Smollett prize.
A prison term supply of Juicy Fruit and soap-on-a-rope?
🙂
😉
This should be loads of fun.
If Elon doesn't watch it, the feds are gonna Prigozhin him.
I'm honestly surprised the CIA hasn't buried him in a field somewhere already.
Get ready for some anti-Musk articles at Reason.
EXCLUSIVE: The federal agency that hosted the domain for then-Vice President Joe Biden's hidden email address has been uncovered
Spoiler alert: Robert L. Peters is CIA.
With all the secret emails flying back and forth between the pci.gov and rosemontseneca.com domains I'm sure all the hard drives of all the computers that downloaded all of the emails are safely stored in NARA-controlled facilities. Especially considering they required a federal agency to protect them.
What. a. fucking. clown. show.
Many have asked for an update to the Buttplug Horse Race:
The Buttplug Index has been updated! The new Buttplug-odometer GOP Horse Race handicap index:
Fatass Donnie: favorite at 1-2 odds – can he avoid prison? A conviction would help his poll #s.
Da Meatball: 4-1 underdog. Needs Donnie to trip in the mud on turn 1. Boring guy. Needs to lie more.
Chris Christie: 5-1 dark horse rising. Got the Never Trump track and ridin' it! Fat enough though.
Mike Pence 15-1 needs to expand past the Fundie Nut vote. MAGA cult hates him.
Doug Burgum 80-1 only real Bidness man – a rarity these days. Eyebrows cost him votes.
Nikki Haley 100-1 only filly in the field. Scratching back though.
Tim Scott 400-1 Whuffo Bro? Whuffo is you in dis race fo, bro?
Vivek 500-1 The Swamprat is a Hindu! Fundies will never support him!
Asa 2000-1 too nice for the GOP
Wager at your own risk!
I bet you chuckled to yourself as you typed that, whispering "Buttplug my boy, you're so witty".
I'm a cynic, dude. I see absurdity in all these wanna-be tyrants. Especially politicians and the clergy. You Weird-Hat types are the worst.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a TDS-addled lying pile of lefty shit.
Cynic? BWAHAHAHAHA! Don't make me spit out my water. You're a bigot, part of the establishment, and a pedo. Oh, and a big fat fucking liar.
You support the biggest tyrants openly dumdum.
If you were actually a cynic you wouldn't be mouthing establishment tropes and platitudes all day.
Yeah, he's not only dishonest; he's abysmally stupid besides.
turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
I've been told you guaranteed Jeb Bush would be the nominee in 2016.
#BadTrackRecord
Yes, I thought when the Trump absurdity faded the GOP would find their Bush home they loved so much 2000-2009.
Your track record wasn't much better before or since.
turd lies when he knows he’s lying. turd lies when we know he’s lying. turd lies when he knows that we know he’s lying.
turd lies. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit and a pederast besides.
Please clap.
Nikki!
What are the odds on the election being postponed because of another pandemic?
My Magic 8 Ball says, "Looks Like Yes". Of course, it's not always accurate.
You're being modest. If anyone asks you if your Magic 8 Ball is ever right, just give them some hand waving about being right with Yes answers vs. being right of Yes answers and then give them a firm assurance that it's 100% safe and effective.
Pretty low, considering the last one wasn’t delayed, when there really was a pandemic going on.
That said, Laursen, let's not be disingenuous about it, there were calls to delay the election from both sides. In lieu of that, we had drop boxes out well before the actual election with mail-in balloting, and then a count afterwards that stretched a few weeks.
As long as the Dems can use Covid to cover fraud and push election watchers away, Mike will be happy.
"Tim Scott 400-1 Whuffo Bro? Whuffo is you in dis race fo, bro?"
Another quote to add to my growing list of "Buttplug being racist" quotes.
538 posted a poll by Rasmussen earlier this week that asked Republican voters to pick a candidate assuming Trump wasn't available.
Vivek Ramaswamy came in 1st (just ahead of DeSantis)
Tim Scott came in 3rd (ahead of Christie, Haley & Pence)
Larry Elder came in 7th (out of 13 choices) (and ahead of Hutchinson) (and he's not even running)
It's almost like the supposed right-wing racism is actual projection.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/polls/president-primary-r/
Man, I love when you can’t help but expose what a racist piece of shit you are.
Your daily reality check.
SF voters getting what they deserve:
"Hundreds of government employees in San Francisco told to work from home due to the high levels of crime in the area, report says"
https://www.insider.com/government-employees-san-francisco-told-to-work-from-home-crime-2023-8
The answer to the question: 'What happens when you pay deadbeats to show up and stay somewhere?'
Happening at the Nancy Pelosi Federal Building.
Appropriate, ironic, or something else?
If cops can work from home, why not everyone?
Cops have always worked from home...Just from other people's homes whom they raid as well as dog houses.
🙂
😉
Weird how much more diverse the GOP field is than the Dem field was in 2020...
2 indian faces of white supremacy, 1 woman face of white supremacy, 1 fat ass of white supremacy...
So is 'the one who stayed away' then not a white supremacist?
The injured face of white supremacy?
You say 2020 like Rubio, Cruz, and Ben Carson didn't participate in the 2016 GOP Primary while the most diverse candidate the DNC had at the same time was Elizabeth Warren and she dropped out before the primary.
I’m just now watching some of the debate, to get my own bearings.
Mike Pence’s attacks on Vivek Ramaswamy’s lack of experience is probably the worst optics he could have chosen. Pence doesn’t realize that the Republican base is realigning and Republican voters aren’t interested in politics as usual. The massive boos he got for calling Vivek a “rookie” should be a sign. When faith in institutions is nearly an all-time low, you can’t flaunt your bona-fides as a member of the institution.
Asa Hutchinson was trying to win me over by citing the reduced administrative state during his term in office, but then letting me know he had been a federal prosecutor and a former administrator of the DEA lost me right back. But who knows, that stuff may play better with the Republican base than it does me.
I wasn't voting for Nikki Haley anyway, but holy shit, she pulled out the identity politics card. "If you want something said, ask a man, but if you want something done, ask a woman."
Fuck off. I'm not voting based on the shape of your genatalia you dumb twat. Sure, it was perhaps a tongue-in-cheek jibe, but in the era where identity politics is becoming everything, you can't play this card anymore.
"identity politics card. “If you want something said, ask a man, but if you want something done, ask a woman.”"
A line that would already be cringe but accepted in a DNC debate, I really think she has misread her audience
To be fair, she was quoting Margaret Thatcher, who was definitely a conservative, but the political climate in which she said that no longer exists. What was a cute jab at "The Man" in the 80s is picking a side in a culture war in the '20s.
What was a cute jab at “The Man” in the 80s, in the UK, is picking a side in a culture war in the ’20s.
In a different context, "If you want something said, ask a British man, but if you want something done, ask an American woman." could've been a solid hit.
Margaret Thatcher wouldn't be named the leader of the Conservative Party today. She was too much of an internationalist.
Similarly, Ronald Reagan would remain a Democrat today. He didn't hate immigrants or Gays, wanted to stick it to the Russians at every opportunity, and was a free trade advocate. All heresies in MAGA world.
And they all had a chance to score points on climate change and failed it. The simple answer is "Don't pick a cure that's worse than the disease," which is what happens when you ignore the environmental impacts of carbon credits, ignore the ecological impact of wind farms, off-shore wind farms, lithium mining, and the problems of disposing of EV batteries and solar batteries. Stop the government subsidies, stop picking winners and losers, and let the free market decide.
Nikki Haley again with the cringe. "Can't we all agree that we're not going to give the death penalty to a woman who gets an abortion?"
For fuck's sake, nobody is saying this. And almost nobody is for punishing women for getting abortions, they usually want to target doctors. Stop misrepresenting people you disagree with.
While I tend to agree with this, I think it is giving too much of a pass to the abortion warriors. Months ago, the idea of a national abortion ban was pretty much out the window and the talking points were largely "Yay! now this is a state decision." But there are many activists in the anti-abortion crowd who wanted to take the ban national, and there are many who want to criminalize women for getting an abortion. They may be fringe, but they are already getting laws proposed at the state level, and they need to be pushed back against- hard.
No, I do agree with this. I think it's dumb as fuck that Republicans, after finally getting Roe v Wade overturned, which they've been campaigning on for 40 years, now want to make abortion a national issue. Just take the win and move on. But this is the problem with established, entrenched political types-they don't have anything else in the quiver, they can't deal with abortion ceasing to be a winning political issue. It's the same as the race grifters who couldn't live in a world where racism was beginning to decline as a concern.
My point was that it doesn't help to strawman your opposition, especially when you're strawmanning your own base of supporters. It's a terrible strategy for a Republican candidate to build a strawman out of the pro-life base.
No, I do agree with this. I think it’s dumb as fuck that Republicans, after finally getting Roe v Wade overturned, which they’ve been campaigning on for 40 years, now want to make abortion a national issue. Just take the win and move on
It was inevitable when blue states started going all-in on "elective abortion even after the infant's feet leave the magic birth canal" like the proposed Virginia law, that red states would go in the opposite direction. Not that it isn't dumb for them to do so, but this is also part of the national sorting that's taking place now.
However, I also have no problem with people in blue states aborting their spawn, and think it should be encouraged with incentives--say, abort your kid and get a $100 gift card to Amazon or something.
If abortion is murder [which is the position of some in the pro-life crowd]; what do some of the States in our country do with someone convicted of murder?
I'm against the death penalty, but a mother going to an abattoir and having her child torn limb from limb, should carry the exact same penalty as if she drowned it in the bathtub three months later.
A commentator in this very thread wrote just that four hours ago.
Asa can fuck right off.
https://news.yahoo.com/arkansas-governor-asa-hutchinson-mask-mandate-covid-cases-142346775.html
Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchinson said he regretted signing a law banning local mask mandates as COVID-19 cases continue to rise in his state.
^ 100% disqualification right there, plain and simple
All these candidates committing suicide just to signal to the donors that they're solid.
Donors got a HUUUUUUUUGE boner for Haley's pro Ukraine neocon speech
So that's why they didn't show the center of the front row below the waist.
Hutchinson is a bog-standard neocon--someone who's manically focused on tax cuts and foreign wars, but wants to completely disengage the right on the cultural front. He would have been fine in 1996 or 2000, but his faction is completely done as a an influential force in the GOP.
"Pence doesn’t realize that the Republican base is realigning and Republican voters aren’t interested in politics as usual. The massive boos he got"
Ya, this. Having street cred in the form of holding elected office in the GOPe is honestly one of the biggest red flags for most voters now. Especially as more of those said RINOs are merging with the DNC to become the "Defenders of Democracy and Ukraine Gay Space Commune" uniparty
You can't afford to look like you're threatened by a political outsider. You can go after him for substantive reasons, based on things he's said or vague policy positions, but if your main avenue of attack is to claim people shouldn't vote for someone who isn't part of the establishment, you're absolutely tanking credibility with Republican voters.
"Pence doesn’t realize that the Republican base is realigning and Republican voters aren’t interested in politics as usual."
It was weird during Trump's interview with Carlson last night. Carlson kept on asking about Pence and Trump wouldn't say anything bad about him.
Which is weird, because Trump doesn't usually hesitate to attack people trying to fuck him over. Especially people who think that they have some sort of dirt on him.
Maybe Trump is afraid he’ll be held in contempt of court if he says bad things about a potential witness against him.
I'm pretty sure Trump absolutely plans to be held in contempt of court. He's making no secret of his lack of respect for anyone involved.
The worst optics Mike Pence chose last night was raising his hand when asked if he will support his former boss, who supported hanging him for not violating his oath to uphold the Constitution, if his former boss wins the Republican nomination.
He might as well have held up a sign that says, “I WAS BORN WITHOUT A SPINE”.
It was especially pathetic that, like DeSantis, he looked around at the other candidates on the stage for a moment before raising his hand.
who supported hanging him
Cite?
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/25/trump-expressed-support-hanging-pence-capitol-riot-jan-6-00035117#:~:text=Insurrection%20fallout-,Trump%20expressed%20support%20for%20hanging%20Pence%20during%20Capitol%20riot%2C%20Jan,2%2C%20three%20people%20told%20POLITICO.
So a second hand, I mean third hand rumour presented to the J6 kangaroo court without evidence that Trump vehemently denied? You really nailed that one.
“The Jan. 6 select committee has heard testimony indicating that then-President Donald Trump — after rioters who swarmed the Capitol began chanting “hang Mike Pence” — expressed support for hanging his vice president, according to three people familiar with the matter… Meadows’ account as it was described to the committee… All three people spoke on condition of anonymity…”
So anonymous people told the totally honest and legit January 6th committee that Mark Meadows told them that he heard Trump say it.
But Mike Liarson is going to assume he said it, because he gives people the benefit of the doubt. Oh, sorry, I meant he gives DEMOCRATS the benefit of the doubt.
Meadows then left the dining room and informed other people nearby that Trump had signaled a positive view of the prospect of hanging the vice president, the panel heard.
POLITICO could not independently verify the veracity of the claim regarding Meadows’ comments.
...A member of Meadows’ legal team, who declined to be named, told POLITICO that the account is “totally incorrect regarding Meadows.”
Nice citation. It basically proves that there's nothing to substantiate this claim.
Knew you would counter with that argument. We are not talking a courtoom level of proof.
We are talking enough proof that Pence, personally, should be a man and stand up for his own honor and for civil behavior.
If Pence doesn't believe the accusation that a group of three anonymous people heard Mark Meadows say that he heard Trump say that he was in favor of hanging Mike Pence, which is denied by Mark Meadows, Mark Meadows' attorneys, Trump, and Trump's attorneys, then it means something different about his actions.
You admit that support for this accusation is so ridiculous you wouldn't be able to OFFER it in court, much less prove it, but still assume that Pence has no choice but to believe it. This is very clownish of you.
Of course you knew I'd counter with the fact that this claim is so tenuous that it might as well have not happened-it's because it's such a tenuous claim that there's no reason to believe this happened. Which is the very reason it's stupid for you to push this claim. If you knew you were going to be immediately called out, it's perhaps evidence that you shouldn't put fort such a weak argument with so many holes.
The purpose of asking for a citation is not to find evidence that someone, somewhere has made a claim, but to evaluate the strength of that claim. So yes, your shitty claim has no leg to stand on and there's a lot of people pushing it who have a history of lying specifically about Trump, so I don't see any reason to believe it.
I don’t care what you believe.
Nobody cares what you believe, disingenuous cunt.
https://apnews.com/article/pence-trump-january-6-capitol-riot-carlson-1e38cb44d55737031ca528b4f33aa1fb
Mike Pence: “… his reckless words endangered my family and everyone at the Capitol that day, and I know history will hold Donald Trump accountable.“
Mike Pence, last night: “Hey, but I’ll still support the guy if he wins the Republican nomination.”
That's not a cite, you silly fuck. That's a shouted accusation by a lynch mob.
Weird.... the last 2 weeks you have claimed you are against most of the political legal attacks on trump. Yet here you again fully support them.
"who supported hanging him"
You always have the damndest takes. Who's feeding you this nonsense?
OK, everyone, which one of these is Trump going to tap for his V.P. running mate? Or will it be someone else and whom will that be?
I'm guessing Sarah Palin or Tulsi Gabbard. Both would piss off both the Left and Melania!
Rumors are it will be Kari Lake or Donald, Jr.
Cite?
I don't think a father-son POTUS-VPOTUS candidacy would be a good look for American democracy, no matter who it is.
Having both Bidens on the ticket will be a great show to watch.
Most definitely it would not be a good look. Our tradition is to space the father/son Presidential dynasties out a little more. It’s probably just a silly rumor.
Again, you have a link for this rumor?
Probably Rachel Maddow.
Rumors by who?
vivik or noem
If it's one of the debaters, I'd say Tim Scott is the only one still viable as VP. Ramaswamy is out because Trump does not like being upstaged. DeSantis/Christie/Haley/etc have explicitly or implictly criticized Trump and he does not tolerate that.
If the Republican Party refuses to give Trump the nod because of the show trials or something, Trump/RFK Jr.
And they would win (and be immediately assassinated by the CIA/FBI).
Reason tells us all of the time that we need a third choice. I would vote that ticket Republican, Democrat or independent. If nothing else, watching the elitist brains explode would be worth it.
The Florida State Board of Education voted unanimously Wednesday to add harsher penalties to a new law barring transgender students and staff at state colleges from using facilities such as restrooms and locker rooms that are consistent with their gender identity," reports The Hill.
cOnSiStEnT wItH tHEir gEnDEr iDEnTity!
What a joke. you mean "opposite from their sex"
Sex is a substantial physical characteristic, and there is at least a rational basis for segregating restrooms and locker room on the basis of sex.
Gender identity is a superficial characteristic. It makes no more sense to segregate restrooms, locker rooms, or sports teams on the basis of gender identity than it would make sense to segregate these based on skin color.
or based on religion, or favorite color.
Sex is a substantial physical characteristic, and there is at least a rational basis for segregating restrooms and locker room on the basis of sex.
There is also a rational basis for not unifying restrooms and locker rooms on the basis of sex.
It's actually kinda microcosmically, nefariously, mindblowing how the distinction between gender and sex gets downplayed and magnified selectively but the distinction between the two definitions of sex get downplayed if not ignored. Like from the beginning the plan was to regard everyone not as individuals but as inconsequential nuclei in the giant human plasmodial slime mold.
Shit. I was really looking forward to swinging my dick around in a Florida high school girl's locker room. Already booked the flight. Hope I can get a refund.
Spinsters. The real villain.
Republicans are winning married men by 20 points, married women by 14 points, and unmarried men by 7 points. So who is keeping Democrats competitive?
Answer: Single women are single-handedly saving the Democratic Party by a 37-point margin (68% to 31%).
Who is keeping them competitive? The people who print, mail, and count the mail-in ballots?
That's the Chicago Way (D-Corruption). Keep the deceased on the rolls, mail and harvest ballots, tell people who to vote for, and then manufacture votes when needed.
unmarried young women are going to be the death of us all
Don't worry, Reason assures us that the scourge of teen boys identifying as Conservatives is between temporary and virtual.
Funny story. My wife and I got married on the island of Tortola, BVI in 1986. On the the marriage license l am identified as bachelor. She is identified as spinster.
Yes Republicans- take off the mask and show the American people who you are. It's "states' rights" until you get it there, then it is a full on national ban.
At least don't lie about your true aims to make this some kind of Christian theocracy.
Desperate this morning, Jeffy?
At the risk of triggering Encog, a Christian theocracy is infinitely preferable to your sex/death cult theocracy.
The only viable Protestant Christian theocracies I can think of were the Dutch Republic, Geneva and the Massachusetts Bay Colony, which were no worse than any other state in their day.
Massachusetts Bay was not a theocracy. John Winthrop was a lawyer, not a minister.
But the effect on Mary Dyer was the same. It will be the French Wars of Religion all over again. Don't pretend that you won't be targeted.
https://twitter.com/Babygravy9/status/1694734445511684593?t=luJzPNCogPR9DbHwe4kUlA&s=19
The bar is so incredibly low for Republicans now. All you have to say is, "You should care at least as much about your fellow Americans who die in a terrible disaster at home as you do about foreigners dying in one of our proxy wars" and you're the most patriotic man on stage.
[Link]
"North Dakota Gov. Doug Burgum rejected it on principle, asserting that it would be unconstitutional."
+1000000000000..... Someone to look into further.
Abortion?
That was your take-home from that debate?
Well, to be fair, it is ENB after all. If it's not abortion, it's sex work and sex workers.
Commiserations to you Putin bots on the untimely and completely accidental demise of your uberboss Prigzhin
I wish it were so, but I heard on FOX last night that he has others assume his name on flights. We need a body and a Munchkinland coroner's pronouncement:
Wizard Of Oz Munchkin Coroner
https://youtu.be/6cMsXBJ0Y98?si=IxyA13_RuljTiDos
Well Putin has issued his condolences.
So perhaps – soon. Cue Monty Python
dude's faked his own death before
"Putin bots"
JFree (Jeffy?) honestly believes that if you don't support his neocon war boner you're a Putin propagandist.
"if you don’t support his neocon war boner you’re a Putin propagandist."
That isn't s belief that is a fact. You are either for good or evil. Ronald Reagan used to talk about moral clarity. This is one such example. If Reagan were President today Ukraine would have more F-16s than it has pilots. But the Republican Party is now the Party of Putin and Nikki Haley is about to discover that.
“You are either for good or evil.”
How cute. Are you 12 years old?
Pet peeve time again: "Candidates need to stop ..." and "They need to stop spending ..."
Apparently, they do NOT "need to" or they would! We might need them to stop spending and stop saying nonsesne ... or we might prefer that they stop spending and stop saying nonsense; but they don't NEED to!
People use the word 'can't' wrong all the time. I usually respond, "well I did, so you must be wrong."
I can’t even rn.
Well, did she survive or not? Is she still just a clump of cells? Night of the living dead? Quato? Talk about burying the lead.
GOP candidates enthusiastic about idiotic idea to invade Mexico.... "So as president would I use force, would I treat them as foreign terrorist organizations? You're darn right I would."
So, I know I might be losing some of my male chauvinist, white nationalist supremacist street credit here, but in this fight over who gets the girl, do we get to hear what Mexico, Guatemala, etc. have to say?
Also, oh sure, when Reason wants all the drugs and immigrants flowing into this country they're "Like, borders are just a figment of imagination! You need to lay off the fascist Nationalism and get hip to Globalism and become more one with the universe, man!" But when little Fernando Sanchez's abuelita gets some Tranq-laced heroine and dies, and he signs up to go legally execute the bastards who did it, Reason gets all "MUH FURRIN' BORDERZ IS GETTIN' VIUHLATED!"
1% of abortions is 12,000 abortions which is higher than the amount of homicides a year.
6% of abortions is 48,000 abortions a year.
If you want to be honest, you need to say how many abortions a year there are and use the total number rather than percentages.
Is birth control an abortion? Perspective also needs to be addressed honestly. Ya know; like the honesty in saying Pre-viable reproduction has no inherent right to life. And gov-gun forced reproduction is a massive violation of individual liberty and privacy.
Is birth control an abortion?
Stop being deliberately retarded.
Pre-viable reproduction has no inherent right to life.
Why?
gov-gun forced reproduction
Government is forcing them to fuck? They've already reproduced by the time an abortion comes into play.
1) Not retarded at all? What is abortion in the numbers? Day after pill? Day before pill? The subject is so polluted with biased assumptions an actual definition needs to apply to any numbers claim.
2) Why? Do you not understand what the word ‘inherent’ means? It means self-sustainable.
3) One thing Pro-Life does so well is word games in fantasy land. Seriously; Sex is the same as Reproducing and Reproduction is already done by the time abortion comes? So your story is there is no 9-months; The nasty women have been lying to the world and are actually hiding those babies in wire cages????
Ironically; If that’s your ?honest? idiotic take on the subject – you might want to lobby to set the babies FREE! Oh that’s right – it was all just BS propaganda so in reality they can’t be set free because setting them free is abortion!!!
See nothing but a catch-22 of word games and propaganda that circles around bytes itself in the *ss. But hey; so long as those gov-guns can force it to happen right??? right? Gov-Gods make everything! /s
One thing Pro-Life does so well is word games in fantasy land. Seriously; Sex is the same as Reproducing and Reproduction is already done by the time abortion comes?
Can you name one person who has reproduced without having sex?
In chronological order?
Darth Vader.
Jesus.
Taliesin.
King Arthur. (some traditions)
Actually I don't think JC reproduced. Mary did. Joseph was a cuckold.
All of those 'people' were born without their moms doing the normally necessary bits.
Can you name one person outside of stork-dropping cartoons that was delivered and exists the same day as having sex? How about a week? A month?
Your loaded premise just turned on you.
No matter how many times you say it, it’s still fucking stupid to equate the process of gestation with the act of reproduction.
Oh; Is that the only problem here? I can use the word gestation if you want me to really makes no difference. But you might want to notice most definitions for reproduction is a 'process' not the equivalent of 'sex'.
"Reproduction is the process of making new organisms."
"the process by which plants and animals give rise to offspring"
"reproduction, process by which organisms replicate themselves"
And frankly; You can thinks it's stupid all you want. It doesn't justify pulling the gov-guns out at everyone to force them to "gestate" against there own will. It's just flat out none of your business exactly how it's just none of your business when any family makes a decision to pull life support from grandpa. You really think that's what gov-guns are for? Dictate other people's personal life's/decisions/families about what you think is stupid?
Yes, being precise when you’re arguing for or against abortion is necessary.
Nobody is forcing women to fuck until they get bred, so saying that the prolife side is using “gov-gun forced reproduction” is inaccurate, as by the time an abortion is being performed, that new organism already exists.
Also, this is why I will never call myself pro-choice. I never said it was, but science forbid anyone point out when y’all make asinine statements. They must be some stupid prolifer to do so.
Even stupider is the act of enslaving by threat of deadly force, thereby increasing the death rate among women, and doublethinking that into some sort of goodly obeisance to Allah of the Baby Jesus.
If you cannot support ?baby? freedom ( fetal ejection )
UR supporting Gov-Gun forced reproduction.
He still hasn’t had anyone explain the birds and the bees to him, poor thing.
My birds and bees explanation didn't teach me gov-guns were required.
And, then, if you are honest, you would look into how many of those abortions were for valid medical reasons. You wouldn't just throw the numbers around without that additional context.
the abortions you desire don't happen for valid medical reasons and you know it.
and the people you desire to exist don't just exist because sex happened and you know it.
a) I don't "desire" abortions.
b) I know no such untrue fact.
About two percent of abortions are medically necessary. Most are from ectopic pregnancies.
But the Republicans want two percent of pregnant women to die.
You know, except all of the ones that always support language that includes saving the life of the mother.
Oh and the tiny fact that ectopic pregnancies aren’t treated with abortion.
"Honest" and "mystical looter" do not fit into the same part of a Venn diagram. Qualifiers clearly distinguish libertarians from The Kleptocracy.
how many times was Hunter escorted off the back of AF2 with the press who didn't report it?
The correct answer is: Every Time.
Things like abortion, birth control, etc. is all personal choice and no government should be able to interfere with that.
Neither looter party had a plank to upset the Comstock applecart in 1972. But as soon as the Supreme Court settled the Austin Texas case with the Libertarian Plank solution, the Prohibition Party and Gee-Oh-Pee both demanded a constitutional Amendment to enslave women and set vigilantes to hunt them and doctors down--and still do. Fanatics shot doctors in the US, while all laws enslaving women were nullified in Canada. Hopefully Republicans will select Trump or some other Robert Dear clone and ride that bomb to their just desserts. I won't miss them. One looter party is more than enough.