Donald Trump Has a Wild New Immigration Plan
A report reveals new draconian restrictions the 2024 frontrunner wants to implement, such as sea blockades in Latin America and "ideological screening" for migrants.

During former President Donald Trump's time in the White House, his administration rattled the legal immigration system and implemented hardline policies with consequences that are still felt today. According to a new report by Axios' Stef W. Kight, the 2024 presidential frontrunner has even more draconian restrictions on his agenda.
"Trump's plan would involve waves of harsh new policies — and dust off old ones that rarely have been enforced, if ever," writes Kight. One policy would "ramp up ideological screening" for would-be legal immigrants. U.S. immigration law already largely bars Communist Party–affiliated people from immigrating, but Trump would reportedly expand that to reject "Marxist" applicants. Another policy would expand the former president's "Muslim ban" to "block more people from certain countries from entering the U.S.," notes Axios. Trump's platform would also include ending birthright citizenship and carrying out quick deportations of criminal migrants under "an obscure section of the 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts."
Other aspects of the plan would target drug cartels and smuggling. It would label cartels as "'unlawful enemy combatants' to allow the U.S. military to target them in Mexico," Axios reports, the same designation the government has used "to justify long-term detentions of 9/11 suspects at Guantanamo Bay." It would also authorize the Coast Guard and Navy to form a blockade in U.S. and Latin American waters to halt boats carrying drugs.
Certain aspects of the plan, if implemented, would likely run into legal challenges. One such aspect is Trump's reported intent to use the Alien Enemies Act, signed by President John Adams in 1798, "to quickly remove smugglers and migrant criminals…without having to go through legal steps in [Immigration and Customs Enforcement's] deportation process." Other policies would put hopeful migrants—and even travelers—through invasive and costly procedures to enter the U.S., such as social media searches and paying bonds to come here.
In all, the platform would continue the Trump administration's efforts to narrow access to the U.S. immigration system and ongoing calls on the right to take military action against drug cartels. Stephen Miller, a far-right senior adviser to Trump who was the driving force behind some of the administration's cruelest immigration policies, called the plan "sublime" and predicted that "the 2025 crackdown would bolt the hatches faster than a thunderclap and tighter than a submarine."
Of course, "bolting the hatches" and bombing the cartels both neglect the realities of supply and demand. Without legal immigration options, people who are sufficiently desperate will seek more covert (and more dangerous) ways to enter the country. Trump's border wall didn't succeed in keeping people out, even in places where it was completed—but it did lead to deaths and injuries among the many migrants who tried to climb it. Likewise, turning the military on drug cartels won't do anything to address stateside demand for their product. It'll just lead to more violence, corruption, and black-market activity throughout Latin America.
Trump has undeniably helped define the GOP's current immigration priorities, which are heavy on restrictionism and light on reform. Many of the Republican Party's top 2024 presidential contenders, including Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy, and Sen. Tim Scott (R–S.C.), have expressed support for policies Trump carried out during his first term. As he charts an even harsher path on immigration and the border, more counterproductive and heavy-handed policies could enter the mainstream GOP platform.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Donald Trump Has a Wild New Immigration Plan
Reason should look at Biden's plan.
I know it. I mean, what about? And what about? What about? What about what about? What? About?
I mean, you constantly cry about costs associated with things such as tariffs but continue to ignore the costs of illegal immigration.
https://www.fairus.org/issue/publications-resources/fiscal-burden-illegal-immigration-united-states-taxpayers-2023
Hey lover, is that Himalayan salt I taste on your taint?
I'm glad you're still socking sarc. Shows your hypocrisy as usual.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Not long ago there were many claims that "immigrants were a net positive for the community". New York city is bursting at the seams with their new found wealth.
I mean border towns were already the meccas of the world, swimming pools full of cash.
Well, they do tend to use cash to buy and sell a lot of different things there.
Um, Biden's plan is even wilder and newer? Biden is going to wilder and newer Trump?
You have to go.
A lot of people, have to go. Hopefully soon.
Yeah, Reason should really cover immigration more:
https://reason.com/category/immigration/
Biden doesn't have a plan, which is why the border is in crisis. Trumps plan is needed now because of Biden.
Biden doesn't have a plan he can publicly admit to. Illegal immigration didn't jump 5 fold in a couple of months after he took office due to not having a plan. It was the result of HAVING a plan.
It's just that it was a plan to throw the border wide open while pretending to do something.
Sounds like Trump is Right again - he's nailed our problems at the border ! I'm praying Myorkas is impeached !
If by impeached, you mean found guilty of, and executed for treason. Then yes, he should be impeached.
Most Libertarian President Ever
only Nixon's head is president of the world
……. and Agnes’s headless body is VP.
I predict that very soon, the 100-mile-wide "Constitution Free Zone" in the USA (where "papers please" is in effect, and free travel is restricted) will have a new rule imposed... No cameras allowed! Because we don't want pictures of the piles of corpses! Anyone recall the bans on cameras and pictures of the coffins of too many American soldiers coming home from too many stupid overseas wars? That's what I'm talking about! Spin control, no cameras! The "Constitution Free Zone" will become a free-fire zone, but also a camera-free zone!
Then after that, Trump will figure out a NEW way to score points with his base...
Anyone recall the Iran-Iraq wars of the 1980s? Lots of it was fought in low-laying salt-water marshes. Very tough terrain for Iraqi military vehicles... And it is expensive to bring in bunches of rocks or logs to raise up the mud to make roads. But there were BUTTLOADS of Iranian corpses just laying around for free! So the Iraqis just limed 'em up (for rot-proofing), and lined ‘em up and laid ‘em down to make roads! Lime 'em up, line 'em up, lay 'em down!
So we can soon expect Der TrumpfenFuhrer to steal a page from the Iran-Iraq war! The Mexicans won't pay for His Walls?!? Make raids on Mexican peasant villages, round up conscript wall-building labor, and build the wall out of the limed-up corpses of illegal sub-humans!!! (Or at least the top-rim of the wall, for max psychological intimidation). For every American soldier killed in the effort, there will be reprisal shootings of 200 more illegal un-Americans!
Don't say no one warned you of what is coming! Trump wants to "win" at any costs!
Iran-Iraq war…
For those who may not believe me…
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-08-14-wr-831-story.html
Documentary : Madness in the Marshes: Hussein’s Last War : The Iraqi leader’s tactics were surgically precise in the spring of 1984. Thousands of Iranian troops paid the ultimate price.
Why would he need to "score points" with his base when a 2nd term president wouldn't be running for re-election? This is pretty far-fetched considering how effective he was by just allowing ICE and Border Patrol to do their jobs.
Trump CAN run for a second term after having bowed OUT for 4 years! That is, IF He gives UP on His Fantasy of having been POTUS-in exile for going on 4 years now! Which may have been behind His Calculus behind the VERY latest news!
STOP THE PRESSES!!! INSERT HOTTEST NEWS FLASH!!! BREAKING NEWS!!!
Trump finally (Sort of) concedes!
My most-senior inside contact at the Shadow White House has surreptitiously slipped me an advance copy of the ex-lame-duck POTUS’s concession speech. Without further ado, here it is:
Friends, non-foreigner-type True Americans, and all who Make America Great Again, lend me your ears! I come to bury Biden, not to praise him. Biden and his minions stole the elections, and we must dishonor that! To Make America Great Again, we must invent the most fantastic, fabulous, YUUUGEST BIGNESS EVAH SEEN, in the ways of truly factually fictitious, but Spiritually and Metaphorically True, NEW Republican ballots! Because I have directed My Generals and My Scientists to research the current and past performance, efficacy, and patriotism of one-party states, versus multi-party states. As I have directed them to, My impartial, unbiased, data-driven council of My Generals and My Scientists have determined that yea verily, one-party states work better! Therefore, we must all strive for the Glorious Day, when America becomes a one-party state, under the One True Party, the Republican Party!
But for now, the courts have sided with Biden and his camel-toe, and Antifa, BLM, and all the Marxist terrorists. We must let the courts have it their way, with mayo on the side. I mean, with Mao Tse Tung on the side, but without the Proud Boys standing back and standing by. Thank you, Proud Boys, for having stood by me. Also, thank you, Steve Bannon, Vladimir Putin, Kim Ill Dung, and Pepe the Stolen-Intellectual-Property Frog. Pepe, watch out for Miss Piggy, she and her “pre-nuptial contracts” will clean your clock, just like Melania is set to clean mine soon! But I digest.
So we can’t disrepute what the nasty courts have said, or there might be civil war. Sad! The courts aren’t very American these days! And if you don’t like what I just said? Well, I’m sorry that you feel that way!
So congratulations to Biden for having stolen the elections! This is America, so we must properly honor the decisions of the courts, in a dishonorable way! Biden can come and live with us in the White House, per the wishes of the courts. He can pour our covfefe for us, for Steve Bannon, Pepe the Frog, and I, and Jill can make sandwiches for us. We promise to call him POTUS, and her, First Lady! POTUS of covfefe, and First Lady of sandwiches, that is! Hey Biden! Get yer butt over here! Pepe needs some covfefe!
That setup will get us by for a little while! Meanwhile, we can schedule the NEW run-off elections, this time without any fraudulent so-called “Democratic” votes being allowed, and we can do this RIGHT the next time!
Meanwhile, congratulations to Joe Stalin-Biden, on being elected POTUS of pouring covfefe for Pepe!
Also, WHO CARES about the USA Cunts-Tits-Tuition and-or a 2-term limit, any moah? Der TrumpfenFarter doesn't care; why should we?
The Meeting of the Right Rightist Minds will now come to Odor!
Years ago by now, Our Dear Leader announced to us, that He may commit murder in broad daylight, and we shall still support Him! So He Has Commanded, and So Must it be Done!
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jan/24/donald-trump-says-he-could-shoot-somebody-and-still-not-lose-voters
And now, oh ye Faithful of the Republican Church, It Has Become Known Unto us, that it is also in His Power and Privilege Ass Well, to murder the USA Constitution in broad daylight. Thus He Has Spoken, and Thus Must It Be Done! Thou shalt Render Unto Trump, and simply REND the USA Constitution, and wipe thine wise asses with it! Do NOT render unto some moldering old scrap of bathroom tissue! Lest we be called fools, or worse!
https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/03/politics/trump-constitution-truth-social/index.html
Proud Boys, STAND with TRUMP, and stand by! And if ye don’t agree 110%, then we don’t need you polluting our world, because all who disagree with us in ANY way are LEFTISTS!!!
There, I think that’s a wrap! I’ve covered it ALL! You can take the rest of the day off.
(You’re welcome!)
Did you somehow miss Biden's inauguration?
No, butt Der TrumpfenFarter-Fuhrer sure did!
As Obama said, "There was an election. And Joe Biden is now the President."
Actually not - he follows the reasoning of the Founders closer that any other president and abides by the Constitution. Woodrow Wilson (Dem.) is the one that took us into the thinking that we "need to save the world" and put us all in danger.
Not that I disagree about the ineffectiveness of Trump and other nationalista delusions of grandeur, but (playing devil's advocate) the case could be made that closing off even more legal crossing points and bombing the drug cartels doesn't hurt anyone already inside the United States. If more "illegal" immigrants die trying to cross into the U.S. and bombing the cartels leads to more violence in Latin America, "so what?" Trump might say. Such arguments are unlikely to sway the rabid anti-immigration crowds or the demagogues who make a political career out of fanning the flames of hatred.
Being pro-cartel, that's a new one.
Legalize everything and undercut the cartels.
Alcohol producing companies hardly have any drive-by shootings now, like they did 90 years ago.
^^This. You can start small by getting rid of the ridiculous federal laws against pot.
I'm fine with that.
Sounds good to me.
Are we allowed to say illegal immigration isn't cost free yet? I mean even the blue states are admitting it now.
No one ever said it's cost-free. Closed borders are an affront to the Libertarian ideal of free movement.
That's why people everywhere are horrified at the closed borders of North Korea. No wonder Trump was such good friends with Kim Jong-Un.
Yeah, that’s exactly the same thing…….
Don’t you ever get tired of being so profoundly dishonest?
Right, trying to make peace with North Korea was so unlibertarian.
Welfare is a bigger affront. But again you don't want to talk about costs. And why the new sock Jeff?
Taking from someone to give to another is much more authoritarian. Once you start advocating to end the welfare state we can discuss free movement. But seeing as you're likely a welfare recipient on disability for obesity you can fuck off.
I’ll bet he consumes enough Ben & Jerry’s in a month to feed an entire Ethiopian village for an entire year.
Nobody told you that what you call closed does still permit people to leave whenever they want (most of us would say good riddance).
But hey, conflate away.
I didn't see close the borders, I saw close the borders to illegal crossings. A nation with no borders is just the patch of land between real nations. Do you have a sign in your front yard saying everyone is free to walk into my house and take whatever they want? This ludicrous notion that open and unrestricted borders is somehow libertarian is the stuff of children. America has the right to decide who can enter our borders just like you have the right to decide who can come into your home. And no one is "horrified" at the thought that they can't get IN to North Korea, the horror is that no one is allowed get OUT.
You realize there's 100% difference between a nation like North Korea, that closes it's borders to prevent it's citizens from leaving vs a nation that closes it's borders to prevent people from illegally entering?
Closed borders are an affront to the Libertarian ideal of free movement.
Libertarians don’t have an ideal of free movement. Non-aggression and contract/property rights.
The libertarian ideal of free movement was invented by people who, like any good authoritarian, want to honor the contracts they like and dishonor the ones they don’t.
Can we go back to the time when presidential candidates at least pretended to be serious?
Nope.
With Kamala Harris the de facto candidate of a major party?
What happened to a border moat/river filled with alligators?
Was that Trump or Spermin' Herman?
Can't tell our sociopaths apart sometimes.
What happened to a border moat/river filled with alligators?
Unusually high fentanyl levels in the Rio Grande.
Trump’s gator-filled ‘moat’ may be the silliest of his harebrained ideas
.
According to an article based on details from a forthcoming book by two New York Times reporters, the president’s paroxysms over illegal immigration led him to suggest a deep water-filled ditch along the border (more than half of which is the Rio Grande) and stock it with snakes or alligators (what, no piranhas?) to, presumably, poison or eat migrants.
.
Was he serious? Apparently his aides thought so, because they scrambled to put together a cost estimate. And the report also elicited a predictable response from the easily riled president. “Now the press is trying to sell the fact that I wanted a Moat stuffed with alligators and snakes, with an electrified fence and sharp spikes on top, at our Southern Border,” Trump tweeted Wednesday morning. “I may be tough on Border Security, but not that tough. The press has gone Crazy. Fake News!” A general rule of thumb for reading the president: The more Trump protests, the more likely the allegation is true.
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2019-10-02/trump-gators-border-moat
MAKE MEXICO PAY FOR THE MOAT!
>>According to an article based on details from a forthcoming book by two New York Times reporters
lolwut.
Even better, we’ll harvest the organs of child rapists to pay for it.
Child rapists like you.
Maybe Florida can send some excess alligators to Texas.
"...Trump would reportedly expand that to reject "Marxist" applicants. Another policy would expand the former president's "Muslim ban" to "block more people from certain countries from entering the U.S.," notes Axios. Trump's platform would also include ending birthright citizenship and carrying out quick deportations of criminal migrants under "an obscure section of the 1798 Alien and Sedition Acts."
Damn. I was leaning toward voting for Ramaswami, but Trump is looking better.
Apparently there is now a genetic test to detect Marxism. Donnie invented it himself.
The best part of the Axios report as they keep using the wording "would include" as if they are making up Trump's actual platform for him.
Yeah, all those North Korean and Cuban Muslims are being discriminated against.
Naval blockades around Latin America are an idea worth considering
Keep the fentanyl precursor from reaching them from China, and keep the Asians and Africans who are swarming the border from reaching Guatemala
And how many ships would you need to enforce such a blockade? What are you going to do when a China-flagged ship refuses to be boarded? Do you think Asians and Africans are swimming to Guatemala?
Just as with the navies of the Mediterranean countries, the threat of force will be sufficient.
Start with satellite tracking of sea vessels in that area. Simple. NOTHING will get past that. Then, once ID's, interdict. Inspect. Of course, wait till they are in our sovereign waters before approaching. Any such ship bearing contraband (drugs, invaders, etc) would be seized, the contents and people takn captive. Contents destroyed, people with no valid papers returned to their home coutry, vessel seized and held for ransom to cover the costs of the operation. When forty nine out of fifty such ships "don't make it" the next group won't sail.
Of course, we sould always deploy underwater drones such as the ones being deployed in the Ukraine... drug ships simply cease to xist, no trace. Nah better to do it openly and legally. Such laws are already in place anyway. Just use them better than they are being used now.
we had them back whe Cubans were coming here, so desparate they even used old bathtubs. Then we had the DEA running boats and airplaneseverywehre to intercept drugs. So what's new about this plan? Maybe too many of you are too young to rmember those days. Submarines attemoting ti land offshore from San DIego, loaded with weed and coke, Navy and Coasties trying to detect them. Colombia were building them in the rivers, filling them with the dope, setting a skeleton crew with barely enuigh fuel to make it here. Some did, some did not. Their skeletons were slowly dissolved by the salt water when the subs sank. Cheap construction was iffy on a good day. But plenty of them made it and delivered their cargoes.
Funny how so many "americans" seem to forget, or sepise the policy then they DO recall it, that the US Constitution assignes to FedGov the COMMAND to repel foreign invasions. If what is going on now "down there" isn't that, what would be? Shiploads of Ukrainians landing on Corona in San Diego Harbour?
Laugh all you want, but these illegal foreign invaders are creating chaos all round this country. because Dopey Joey lets them, and orders his minions to let them. Orders from above...... da kinyun, ah speck.....
The best solution is to let the labor market work unimpeded by government interference.
https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
That doesn't work when you have a welfare state that provides education, welfare, and health care to everyone. And illegal immigrants are eligible for much of that.
https://twitter.com/_kruptos/status/1694088084868960696?t=3Ye_es9luldsRcY23AWkUg&s=19
Propaganda getting ready to send American soldiers to die in Ukraine.
They are standing up to bullies.
It sounds like it was written to convince school teachers and HR department heads on the necessity of sending American young men to Ukraine.
[Link]
https://efile.fara.gov/docs/7288-Informational-Materials-20230807-1.pdf
It's a foreign agent.
Ironically, these guys registered, unlike Hunter.
“the 2025 crackdown would bolt the hatches faster than a thunderclap and tighter than a submarine.”
Heh. I guess he’s forgotten that Trump was already president for 4 years, and his numbers were not much different from Obama’s.
Trump would reportedly expand that to reject “Marxist” applicants.
Well, Marxist applicants who used their real name on political social media posts, or are stupid enough to tell a consular officer they’re a Marxist. Mostly a symbolic move.
end birthright citizenship
By executive order? He had four years to write and sign one in his last term and it didn’t happen. Anyway, it would lose 7-2 (at least, more likely 9-0) at the Supreme Court.
I’d be more worried about this proposal if there wasn't already a proven record of being an ineffectual blowhard on this issue.
I’d be more worried about this proposal if there wasn’t already a proven record of being an ineffectual blowhard on this issue.
Yeah, but it's great for pushing the OrangeMan(Still)Bad narrative, so get ready for plenty more hyperventilating about what a Big Meanie Trump is.
Umm, “ineffectual blowhard” =/= “meanie”.
Different criticism.
Yeah, but Trump was thwarted by THE DEEP STATE. This time it’ll be different!
Can't we try the ideological screening on kids born in the USA too? A lot of them turn out to be Marxists these days.
Again, I am glad we are talking issues and not personalities. This is an awful plan, that said we don't see much better proposed by either party. There is an obsession with the symptoms of the problems that keep us from addressing the problems. Want to slow illegal immigration, make legal immigration easier, address problems in countries where people are immigrating from. Stop trying to stop smuggling by addressing supply and focus on reducing demand.
"address problems in countries where people are immigrating from"
Nation-building? Not very moderate.
I am not suggesting nation building. I am saying that we should look to ways we can help people in south and central America to reduce the number of people fleeing those countries. Start with better drug laws in the country to reduce our demand. Our county's demand for drugs cause instability in countries to the south. Help these counties financially not by giving them money but by teaching them to build an economy working for their country. Use existing charitable organization to help build up this country.
Yeah; Big socialistic plans will save them from their socialistic plans.. /s
Is a better US drug policy to reduce demand socialist?
Is a better 'US Government' plan for the drug market socialist?
Why yes... Yes it is as a matter of fact.
And "the people's" law over their US government granting authority for any drug policy is found where? Never-mind the biggest value in drugs currently is it's illegal status. I fail to see how making it more illegal will make it's demand less.
How about we look into ways to fix our own country, as opposed to sending billions more to foreign countries, who just keep sending their unemployables to us anyway?
" address problems in countries where people are immigrating from."
Isn't one of the central reasons our various southern neighbors are regularly annoyed with us is our perceived and sometimes real interference in their internal affairs?
We should ABSOLUTELY have ideological screening for immigrants.
"Are you a communist? Get the fuck out"
+10000000000; It is the very difference between a guest and an invader.
Damn, and here I had hoped Fiona had been deported and that was the reason we weren't getting repeats of her one article.
Another rousing meeting of Libertarians for Authoritarian, Bigoted, and Cruel Immigration Policies and Practices, convened at a spot that attracts antisocial, conservative xenophobes.
Bigoted, faux libertarian, obsolete, disaffected right-wingers might be my favorite culture war casualties.
Yeah, Biden's "round 'em up and throw 'em back (but only if they're Haitian)" plan was so much more humane.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/09/23/border-patrol-wont-use-horses-in-del-rio-after-outrage-over-treatment-of-haitians.html
Ideological screening sounds like a good idea. Until the other side starts to use it....
Isn't that exactly what they have been doing under the covers?
The demand in the U.S. for illegal drugs isn't the only thing that drives our issues with Latin America and immigration. I don't see anything being discussed about how to deal with the demand for undocumented workers. U.S. agriculture depends heavily on immigrants without legal authorization to live and work here. Add in construction, and there are simply not enough Americans looking to do those jobs.
“simply not enough Americans looking to do those jobs”
Enter the notion of cause and effect —> *FREE* money from the gov-printing press stealing the value of workers savings topped only by directly subsidizing incompetence and laziness funded by punishing/stealing/taxing the workers…
Of Course no one in the USA wants to work - working might make them 'icky' rich people for the gov-guns-make-sh*t-mob to STEAL from.
Perhaps when justice is re-instated there won't be any demand for importing more SLAVES because people will have to face reality that they have to *EARN* a living not steal it. The worst part of importing slaves is those slaves expect their 'owners' to take care of them. 80%+ of welfare is consumed by immigrants and 80%+ vote for government to take care of them. It's exactly the very curse of Mexico itself (which states that exact thing in it's constitution). The USA does not need to be just like Mexico.
However; just to clarify my position - the 20% who don't think it's the taxpayers job to take care of them and believe in *earning* their living and real-natural-justice should certainly be invited. However; that isn't the type of immigrants we are getting at a 20-80 ratio factor.
"birthright citizenship" is a false meme that does not exist. The mere fact of a child being born while Mama is present here does NOT make him a citizen of the US. Carefully READ that FOurteenth Article of Ammendment. There are some statements that clarify, but these have been conveniently ingored for the past few decades.
Now I will admit, and would favour, some clarification as to these facts, to remove any remaining doubt, question, misinterpretation that might make some mama think her kid, dropped here, is ow a S citiaen and can ef=ventually get her citizenship as well.
That pathway MUST be stopped.
Trump’s own draft dodging Pimp Grandpa would not have been let in the country under these foolish rules.
LOL at describing a German conscript fleeing WWI as a "draft dodger".
Gonna call Albert Einstein a backstabber for forsaking his German heritage and citizenship next?
"According to a new report by Axios' Stef W. Kight ..."
Am I the ONLY one wondering WHY this article has to quote Axios if these policies have actually been stated BY TRUMP?
Why not just quote Trump's supposed policies as stated by Trump? Why filter the supposed facts through claims made by Axios?
I expect actually quoting Trump would mean they had to write a completely different article, but I'm sure it would still have the same sentiment that any nation that actually controls who can enter the country is bad. Remember, these people leave their doors open 24/7 just in case passing strangers want to come in and help themselves.
Actually quoting Trump would likely mean that it would be incomprehensible.
I see I’m not the only one wondering why we have a report on a report of Trump’s proposed policy, and not a report on the policy itself. That doesn’t exactly inspire confidence. Don’t we have enough spin as it is? Now we not only have to consider the validity of the original policy, we have to validate two layers of reportage.
Way to make us work for it, Reason.
And a related question: why is Reason serving up commentary on a report written by the Axios news organization? Isn't that one of Reason's competitors? Axios was founded by former Politico reporters, so they're definitely on the left, not libertarian.
Maybe Reason shares something in common with Axios? Funding, perhaps?
Good.
Oh yeah; Heaven-forbid the US prevent a Communists and Marxists from invading and conquering the USA. It's land of the free for conquering don't you know???? Just ask your leftarded neighbors.
Trump once again showing his honest intentions in how to Making America Great Again and Reason can't help but try to paint a narrative that it is like a horror story.
Communists and Marxists that want to mow your lawn and build your houses mostly.
LOL… The very premise of Communists and Marxists is they don’t want to have to *EARN* what they want in a just society. But like most criminals ('guns' ... gov-guns ... makes sh*t mentality); they PROJECT their mentality onto anyone else they can instead of honestly addressing themselves.
Looks like you missed the joke. "Illegal" immigrants end up taking a lot of jobs that employers can't find enough Americans to fill (at the wages they want to pay). Even the ag industry's trade groups admit that over half of the manual labor jobs on farms are done by undocumented workers. Construction, landscaping... name a low wage job and you'll find businesses hiring the people coming here from what Trump called "shithole countries" south of the border.
It isn’t surprising that democrats support this. They’ve always been pro slavery.
"They’ve always been pro slavery." --- Indeed. Democrats even fought a civil war to ensure their slave-ownership. It's always been about taking others labors (via money/tax today).
I wasn't sure if it was a joke or not. It's hard to tell when the left-leaners make statements that are so crazy false. Just wanted to be sure with some ad-lib. A simple '/s' works great.
"Communists and Marxists that want to mow your lawn and build your houses mostly. /s"
You can have open borders, or you can have a welfare state. When we wean Americans off the government tit, then maybe I shall be open to the idea of immigration. Until then, I would prefer to "make America Tokugawa." Under the rule of the wise Tokugawa Shoguns, Japan was completely forbidden to foreigners save at Dejima in Nagasaki, and its culture reached new heights. We could do the same. Forbid all foreigners save maybe (MAYBE) diplomats from so much as setting foot on US soil, with ruthless penalties for ones we catch and outlaw status for those we don't catch immediately. And by "outlaw" I do not mean "criminal," but the old meaning...one outside the protection of the law, and fair game for anybody.
“You can have open borders, or you can have a welfare state.”
We can also have neither. Let’s do that.
The immigration part actually sounds pretty good to me. Let's do it.