The Government Has Made College an Overpriced Scam
Thankfully, you don't need fancy dining halls or a college degree to have a good life or get a good job.

It's August. Many young people head off to college.
This year, fortunately, fewer will go.
I say "fortunately" because college is now an overpriced scam.
Overpriced, because normal incentives to be frugal and make smart judgements about who should go to college were thrown out when the federal government took over granting student loans.
Why?
Because our government basically vomits money at everyone who applies.
If private lenders gave out the loans, they'd look at whether they were likely to be paid back. They'd ask questions like: "What will you study? You really think majoring in dance will lead to a job that will pay you enough to allow you to pay us back?"
Government rarely asks these questions. Bureaucrats throw money at students. Many don't benefit. Many shouldn't even be going to college. Today, nearly half of the students given loans don't graduate even after six years.
Many feel like failures.
College is good for people who want to be college professors or who major in fields like engineering and computer science that might lead to good jobs. But that's not most people. Government loans encourage everyone to go to college, even if they're not very interested in academics.
Government's handouts also invite colleges to keep raising tuition. Over the past 50 years, college cost rose at four times the rate of inflation. Four times!
Years ago, I reported how colleges were suddenly wasting money on luxuries like fancy gyms and even day spas. Last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that it's gotten worse: The University of Oklahoma bought a monastery in Italy for study abroad students! The University of Kentucky built a theater where students play video games.
"Why not raise tuition?" asks the typical college president. "Uncle Sam pays the bill!"
When I went to Princeton, tuition was $2,000. Now its $60,000.
Colleges have little incentive to cut costs or innovate. Princeton still "teaches" by having professors lecture. Super boring. I slept through many.
Although today, I guess I should thank Princeton because its tedious lectures inspired me to try to find better ways to present information. That made me successful on TV.
Today, student loan borrowers owe tens of thousands of dollars. Last year, President Joe Biden announced he would cancel up to $20,000 of that debt per person.
Indebted students loved that! A group named the Student Debt Crisis Center called that "a major win for many."
But it would be a major loss for many more! Canceling debt is unfair to the people who work hard and pay off their debts.
Fortunately, Biden's plan was struck down by the Supreme Court, which said only Congress has the right to cancel student debt. Congress didn't.
Now Biden's trying again. The administration announced they will forgive debt for anyone who's been making payments for more than 20 years. That's better, but still bad. Maybe courts will stop this handout, too.
College students take on loans and spend decades in debt because they believe they must get a degree to be hired. But that's no longer true. IBM, Accenture, Dell, Bank of America, Google, and other big companies, recognizing the uselessness of many undergraduate degrees, recently dropped college degree requirements. So have state governments in Maryland, Utah, Colorado, Pennsylvania, Alaska, North Carolina, New Jersey, and Virginia.
Good jobs in the trades, like welding and plumbing, don't require a college degree. Trade school programs often take less than two years and cost much less than college.
To have a good life or get a good job, you don't need fancy dining halls, video game auditoriums, or a college degree.
College has become a government-subsidized rip-off. It's good that fewer people go.
COPYRIGHT 2023 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This is why the push for indoctrination has been moved to elementary school..
Finally! There is a great way you can work online from your home using your computer and earn at the same time... Only basic internet knowledge is needed and a fast internet connection... Earn as much as $3000 a week...Get more details on the following site...https://www.dailypay7.com/
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,910 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,910 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
And of course those increased tuition costs don't go to paying more professors more money, college administrator costs have risen at some multiple of faculty costs and administrators now outnumber faculty at many (most?) colleges. Adjunct professors and graduate students now are paid a pittance to teach many of the classes - which in many cases are remedial high school level class work - instead of tenured full professors.
Is it true that the highest paid college employees are the celebrity sports coaches? You rail against administrators, but Nick Saban, football coach for Alabama: almost $US11,000,000. For a season of 8 games.
They bring in a lot of money. High level college sports are a business, even if they won't admit it.
"They bring in a lot of money."
For whom? I doubt the students benefit.
The point is that they aren't the big drivers of tuition increases. Diversity administrators bring no value and only increase costs.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
"Diversity administrators bring no value and only increase costs."
Administrators administrate. You can't run a college or any other institution without administrators. Celebrity football coaches on the other hand could be eliminated without affecting the education of the students, conceivably even lowering their costs.
Weird how colleges ran for centuries without Marxist fucks administering everything.
They had clerical fucks for that.
Say what you want about marxist administrators, but you get a very good one if you're offering 11 million.
That isn't remotely true. More like a colossal waste of money. The "clerical fucks" never made a mistake like that.
Any government subsidy of consumption will push up prices by creating demand where it would not otherwise exist. Ending all government involvement is the only rational solution.
https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
I'm not opposed to a nice looking student center, but the rest? Why not rent the space to private companies, and let students decide what services they want to pay for?
If some young(er) person reading this aspires to work at reason, or for stossel (or the next stossel), you can be sure that the staff there is chock full of non-college-graduates. And the interns too.
Reason and Stossel, just like other employers, welcome and love all non-college-graduates. So, you'll feel right at home there.
It's too late for Stossel to have pursued a non-college background. His affluent upbringing doomed him to attending an ivy league college. Imagine how much better Stossel's life could have been had he not been cursed with wealthy parents and a college education! But Stossel is trying to save the young from the mistakes he made, and the curse of college. Pay heed to Stossel's valuable life advice!
Maybe you should go show up at his house and hold him up with a GUN (gov-gun) and make him pay for anything else you think you want and his 'wealthy' parents too........ F'En criminal minded loser.
You belong in jail.
Thanks for the reply, but I have no idea what your reply means. I did not mean to suggest or imply that stossel or his parents should pay for anything. I also did not mean to disparage stossel's parents or suggest that young stossel shouldn't have the benefit of whatever his parents provided for him.
Stossel wants more welders and plumbers. He says that it is a good thing that less young people are choosing college. The implication is that if he had to do it over again, he would avoid college and go to welder trade school instead. Even if Princeton was still $2000 (which is $20k in today's dollars vs 1965).
I don't disagree with any of that. I'm sorry that Stossel couldn't live his dream of being a welder. My guess is that he parents probably encouraged him to go to an ivy league college rather than welder's college. That was my point.
Oh. Thanks for nicely explaining that. I severely apologize. I took that middle paragraph to be derogatory. Stupid me. 🙂
Great comment. People with college degrees and nice professions recommending not going to college.
A credential is not an education.
It has never made sense to send X amount of kids to college to learn a skillset only to have them vie for X/100 jobs. Nor did the Federal government ever need to get into the Tuition Assistance business.
An alternate reality where Stossel is a welder instead of doing this does sound quite appealing!
Unfortunately for you, our colleges do not promote that kind of outcome.
“Do you liberals live in fantasy land?” — lol… Well, Yes; Yes they do and so long as they get to use Gov-Guns against those ‘icky’ slaves to pay for it their selfish GREED is NEVER going to care…..
"GUNS (gov-guns) make stuff!" They’ll keep believing as all criminals do. Yet they’ll try to convince everyone that their guns are special guns with halo’s that will make everyone’s life great as they stick them in your noses, steal from you and enslave you.
A++++ for Stossel; Excellent video as always.
I tell young people to go to college and then become an anesthesia assistant.
It is another 2 years after college and costs $50,000 per year.
So you graduate with $100,000 in school debt (plus whatever college debt).
We are paying $160,000 plus malpractice, health insurance, 401k retirement with an employer match, and 4 weeks vacation.
There is plenty of opportunity for overtime at $200 per hour.
They will easily be able to pay that loan back and still live an upper middle class lifestyle.
Commie-Education breeding Crony Socialism 101. Two peas in the same pod and no room for any Individual Liberty or Justice for all.
How stupid does a person have to be to think putting the same entity in charge of Justice also in charge of providing services and collecting money is going to go anywhere but criminalistic-ly tyrannical?
"They'd ask questions like: "What will you study? You really think majoring in dance will lead to a job that will pay you enough to allow you to pay us back?"
I doubt this is true. In the 1960s, a growing economy all but guaranteed a job waiting for college graduates, diligent and intelligent people for the most part. This would be even be true for people who studied subjects held in contempt today, like dance.
In a stagnating economy, money lenders may well feel the necessity to channel students into fields they feel will benefit the banks.
Pretty sure it is true. Can't think of any 1960s Feminist graduates because back then the 'study' was so blatantly retarded it didn't exist. Only "armed-theft" can fund stupidity.
There were plenty of blatantly retarded things to study in the 1960s. Dance is only one of them.
Dance is a fine thing to study if you have talent and want to be a professional dancer or dance teacher. It's probably one of the more practical fine arts majors, anyway. But you do need to balance that against what you are paying and taking on for debt. There are more focused, less expensive ways to be trained as a dancer.
"Dance is a fine thing to study if you have talent and want to be a professional dancer or dance teacher. "
As far as I'm concerned dance is a fine thing to study even if you want to be a welder, or have no idea what kind of job you will look for after graduation. If a young person's interests lead in a certain direction, college is a great place to explore those avenues. You're interested in dance? College should be able to help you out. Once you're in the working world, you certainly won't have those opportunities. It would be a terrible loss if college only offered courses of study approved by bankers and money lenders concerned over their loans being repaid.
Did you think “flash dance” was a documentary?
When there are too many applicants for the employer's job openings, they add criteria to make it easier to screen out some of the applicants, like "college degree." This is qualification inflation, similar to grade inflation in public schools. College degrees add nothing to the quality of the employees and are not necessary for the performance of the job tasks; they do not result in higher salaries or increased lifetime earnings.
" they do not result in higher salaries or increased lifetime earnings."
There's no reason to expect otherwise. College is about education. I like the idea of a person following their inclinations and studying what interests them, even if it's something retarded. That they still have to be paying for the privilege 20 years or more after graduating is crazy. Not all that long ago a summer job was enough to cover education for the following year.
"they add criteria to make it easier to screen out some of the applicants, like “college degree.”
Absolutely. An idea of mine, following laws preventing prospective employers from asking job seekers questions like:
Are you pregnant?
What's your religion?
Are you dating anyone?
and so on, add to the list,
What's your education? Where did you go to school?
And the like.
The employer is free to administer quizzes and tests and interviews to decide suitability, but with education history hidden behind a veil, the pressure to go to college simply to satisfy an overworked human resource manager will be off the table. A good thing in my books.
When I was preparing to retire from the military, I was looking to finish my degree (having spent years going to school at night, when I wasn't deployed). I mulled over my options for majors and many friends told me not to worry about it, because with the military experience in the field I was pursuing I just needed a degree to get my foot in the door. So, I chose the quickest route before me and opted for a liberal arts degree.
I'm not sure whether the degree helped me to get a job, but it was certainly a factor in getting promoted. There were others in my company who were outstanding at their jobs (other military retirees) who were kept from promotion because they had no degree. Any degree. What I and others brought to the table was our experience, and I don't think my education did much in making me a better employee in the long run. Heck, several of my military schools were much more challenging than anything I took in college.
I'm not sure what my point is, other than I'm glad I got my degree. It was a long-term effort that the military picked up 75% of my tuition (not books, etc). I suppose it showed potential employers a certain level of dedication, but in a field where at least half had graduate degrees, there was always one more step.
There are many professions that people can choose that do not require college. Some of those jobs like welding and construction bring good pay but do not have as long a work life. Journalist like John Stossel can work well past time when many retire. Job in welding with fumes and in heavy construction pay well but are not something that can be done in later years. A person either has to make enough for early retirement or plan for a second job to carry them to retirement.
So what makes you think that welders and construction workers have any trouble planning for less physical jobs as they age? I have family who switched from specialty welding into quality control and from construction into upper management, site safety, supervisory and planning positions. Obviously not everyone is cut out for that, but there is nothing stopping them from going to college later in order to switch to engineering or other related careers where their job experience helps them and makes career choices better.
I agreed with everything you said. I just think it is important to be honest with young people. If there is a demand for workers it often a factor of job turnover. Good pay but a high turnovere rate. A person has to be ready for that and understand that they can expect to be looking for a new job at some point in their career and that might entail retraining. People like John Stossel and Mike Rowe sometimes are light on that part of these jobs.
I have nothing against college, not even state funded state colleges. But everyone wants to go to a distant elite college of some kind. And government throws the money at students who want to move away to the big city to attend the elite university. When boring Midvale College is just down the street from them.
We have enough colleges for everyone. Access is not the problem. Government needs to stop the awful tuition funding system, and let the market take over. Student loans from real banks that are real loans based on the ability to repay and expected future earnings, with actual co-signers (parents). We don't need student loan forgiveness when we have an actual system of bankruptcy in place. The most generous bankruptcy system in the world!
For the poor that can't afford it and can't get a reasonable loan, we can supply back-pack funding. It still skews the system, but not nearly so much as direct government guarantees and funding. But have it so that it encourages local colleges over distant elite universities.
The price of a college degree is an easily solvable problem. Step one, roll back government involvement and get back to the market.
With the understanding that helping poor students is 1) qualification based; and 2) only for careers that require substantial degrees where positions are readily available.
" only for careers that require substantial degrees where positions are readily available."
First off, they don't have careers, they're students. Wage slavery is still something yet to come. And I disagree that university should primarily concern itself with serving up fresh young bodies according to the demands of industry.
Government needs to stop the awful tuition funding system, and let the market take over.
Fat chance. They're much more likely to double-down with more stupid non-market ideas like free tuition for all or forgiving student loans (basically the same as free tuition).
Increased tuition and payouts to administrators with political connections is a feature of the system, not a bug.
Giving the benefit of the doubt to politicians for the sake of argument, the argument behind the assertion that everyone should have a college degree because people who have college degrees tend to earn more in their lifetimes than those who don't is false and misleading. If you lump everyone who has a college degree together and compare their lifetime earnings to everyone who doesn't have a college degree lumped together which, by the way, includes people who never intended to earn an income outside the home, you are obviously going to see a difference. Of course this would be very poor epidemiology and an abuse of statistical analytical principles which is where they go wrong. However, even if you accept this raw comparison, it still doesn't mean that if everyone who doesn't have a college degree got one that they would earn more in their lifetimes. For example, if there are "X" jobs that pay more for college graduates and they're all filled, and more people earn college degrees they're not going to find jobs that require college degrees and pay more. And if more employers start requiring college degrees for jobs that pay less because there are more college graduates applying, it will weaken the relationship between lifetime earnings for college graduate and higher average earnings. Poor Presidents should actually think before they float irrational pie-in-the-sky policies, but then thinking is hard.
"and more people earn college degrees they’re not going to find jobs that require college degrees and pay more."
College degrees? In the plural? Getting two or more degrees is become much more common, hasn't it? One college degree should be enough to show employers the candidate is reasonably intelligent, diligent and compliant.
"everyone should have a college degree because people who have college degrees tend to earn more in their lifetimes "
Professional careers, in medicine, law, architecture etc all require college or equivalent. Professions are held in high esteem, and are highly paid.
Show business is also highly esteemed and with luck highly paid. And requires no college. I suspect that show business types, who often start at an early age, are among the least educated. George Carlin, a very erudite man, never got beyond high school and was kicked out many times if memory serves.
Show business and sports are not really careers to compare with regular jobs, including professional jobs, doctors and lawyers. The median salary for an actor is just less than $50K a year. A welder would make more and might be a good side hustle for an actor. You act because you love it. You play a sport because you love it. The top range for a minor league baseball player is less than $30K a year. Neither acting nor sports require a college degree, but your chances of being the next George Carlin are pretty slime.
"A welder would make more and might be a good side hustle for an actor. You act because you love it."
I know a plumber and jack of all trades who does TV,
"The top range for a minor league baseball player is less than $30K a year. "
It's not private airplane money, but should be enough. Most of the year is off season anyway.
"but your chances of being the next George Carlin are pretty slime."
Your chances increase dramatically if you're good looking, talented, charismatic, hard working and ambitious.
Capitalism is the only thing raising the price of tuition. The idea that if there is more money available I should take it regardless of whether I'm increasing the value / quality of what I'm offering is morally corrupt at best.
Put it this way , if you had an employee say they know you got a windfall of money and so because you have more money ... they want a raise. Likely, the first thing out of your mouth would be "why should I ? What are you doing different now that is more valuable to me than what you did before you found out I got money ? " And that would be a good, viable set of questions. So why does nobody ask the same of colleges or corporations ? Why are we brainwashed into rolling over and accepting this nonsense as normal ?
Uh, no. Government's involvement in giving students money for college tuition is the main cause of tuition prices rising. You can't expect to give money away while as money chases the same number of colleges and NOT expect higher prices to keep their required payments going.