Federal Court Blocks $20 Billion in Student Loan Forgiveness
The injunction is the latest in a series of setbacks for the Biden administration's loan forgiveness agenda.

A federal court has blocked Biden administration rules that would have provided almost $20 billion in student loan forgiveness, primarily to students who attended colleges that defrauded them.
Last July, the Education Department released new proposed rules expanding eligibility for the department's "borrower defense" forgiveness program, as well as several other smaller loan forgiveness programs. The borrower defense program offers loan forgiveness to students whose schools engaged in misconduct or misled or defrauded them. In most cases, students eligible for borrower defense attended for-profit schools. The rules were finalized last November.
The rules allow students to more easily file claims against their colleges by "allowing for group claims, eliminating overly strict limits on when borrowers can file a claim, expanding the type of misconduct that can lead to an approved claim to include aggressive and deceptive recruitment practices, and ensuring borrowers receive timely decisions about their claims," according to an Education Department press release.
"We are committed to fixing a broken system. If a borrower qualifies for student loan relief, it shouldn't take mountains of paperwork or a law degree to obtain it," Education Secretary Miguel Cardona said in a statement last July. "These proposed regulations will protect borrowers and save them time, money, and frustration, and will hold their colleges responsible for wrongdoing." In total, the new regulations—which included changes to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program and other student loan forgiveness policies—were estimated to cost taxpayers $19.7 billion.
In February, Career Colleges & Schools of Texas, an association of career-oriented, mostly for-profit colleges, filed a lawsuit challenging the rules. While the Education Department contended that the rules only work to help "streamline" claims from affected students, the complaint argued that the rules amounted to a gross overreach of government spending power that unduly punished schools.
"The new processes do not further the fair and accurate adjudication of borrower defense claims. Instead, they are designed to achieve the non-statutory and impermissible objective of massive student loan forgiveness," noted the complaint. "Rather than merely facilitate or 'streamline' the resolution of borrower claims, the Department designed its Final Rule with a thumb on the scale to maximize the number and amount of loan discharges with little regard for the merits of the claims or the rights of schools."
On Monday, a three-judge panel for the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed, granting an injunction against the rules, pending a higher court ruling.
This latest development in the ongoing attempt by the Biden administration to grant large-scale student loan forgiveness shows just how difficult it will be to do that without congressional approval. So far, the Education Department has attempted to achieve loan forgiveness through rule-making procedures and all-too-generous readings of existing law.
However, federal judges seem increasingly suspicious of that approach—and are unwilling to let the Education Department unilaterally spend billions of taxpayer dollars on loan forgiveness schemes.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
"HA-HA"
- Nelson
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
https://twitter.com/loganclarkhall/status/1689728811200385026?t=cbuRzMXqPizMg6062SCFrw&s=19
why should we be forced to pay taxes when we’re treated as second-class citizens in our own country and the money the government collects from us is used to import/subsidize millions of third world immigrants?
[Link]
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
https://twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1689718791914000384?t=Mo4s8Nmuc0nlkuyHW7iZcQ&s=19
JUST IN - Biden asks Congress for another $24 billion for Ukraine.
But he DID ask for $4B for us for the border, fentanyl, etc.
So, we're now worth 16% of what Ukraine is worth to him.
Here's a novel idea. Study something that will get you a job. No, not a position as head barista at Starbucks, but a real job. Then you can pay back those loans all by yourself!
For example most majors with "Engineering" at the end, like "Chemical Engineering" or "Aerospace Engineering."
"Computer Science," "Economic" and "Finance" also pay well.
Unless your goal is to be poor or your family can support you, do not study "Social Services," "Psychology" or anything ending with "Education."
Or better yet, learn a trade.
I have to agree with you. It's worked for me. When I had a chance to go to college in the mid 90's I did a little research and went to a Community College for Machine Design and Computer Aided Drafting. A few years later my Employer paid for me to get my Mechanical Engineering Degree. Right now I'm wearing three hats because we can't find enough engineers.
Funny thing is that the University I attended scrapped an excellent Engineering Program supposedly because the Engineering Students were mostly people with jobs, trying to improve themselves and took going to school seriously. They claimed that intimidated the other students. Now the entire University is Liberal Arts bullshit.
Funny thing is that the University I attended scrapped an excellent Engineering Program supposedly because the Engineering Students were mostly people with jobs, trying to improve themselves and took going to school seriously.
Hate to say it but from a dean's perspective that makes sense. They want the young and dumb who are spending their parents' money.
I worked in restaurants and watched STEM students disappear while English and Psychology majors became career waitstaff.
So I decided to disappear. And I did.
Worked for me, too. AS in engineering science, BS and MS in electrical engineering.
Though I don't think there's anything wrong with a liberal arts degree, if you can find a way to parlay it into a job. If you're going to college to "find yourself", don't bother. You'll just lose yourself again 5 years after you graduate.
Liberal Arts (unless you meant to take a career teaching it) were supposed to be a means of making a well-rounded person. LA teaches all the things not to be made into a conspiracy believing basket-case; like most people are, having gotten rid of LA / Humanities. Things like philosophy, classical logic & argument, history , government ... you know, all the things that keep you from following television shysters like good little sheep.
It was meant to go with your education, not be in spite of it.
LA teaches all the things not to be made into a conspiracy believing basket-case
Is bullshit an acquired taste? Take a look around at your average liberal arts major.
A lot of heavy lifting is being done by "were supposed to be."
Exactly true.
Also, a Liberal Arts education was, and should have been, a broad based thing, an education to teach people how to learn as much as anything else. Somehow it has been glommed on to "studies" majors -- gender studies, ethnic studies, etc. -- that are exactly the opposite of liberal. It's not what it was 70 years ago, or even 40 years ago.
The fact that you can get advanced degrees in narrow, anti-liberal, anti-scientific pedagogy is kind of damning.
I know an LA major who made bank doing sales. Not sure if the degree helped, but that's what they do.
Is bullshit an acquired taste? Take a look around at your average liberal arts major.
Take a look at your average Uncle Cleetus who “dont need no book learnin” who swears the government is making the frogs gay, GMO corn is a mind control medium to turn the country commie, and the entire “I’m a Sovereign Citizen ” crowd of nutcases. What’s your point ?
That's average for you, huh?
Alex Jones is or was the 82nd highest ranking podcast; how many of those folks do you think were listening for it's absurd comedic value vs being rabid believers ? (That believed enough to show up to Sandy Hook funerals and harass folks). How many ppl are still clinging to Fox News ? 1.1 million-ish ? Fox News that is so far from news that they had to legally start calling themselves Fox Entertainment to avoid lawsuits. How many of The Donald and his Merry Band of Trumpeteers are still running around screaming about how he's going to bring back Coal to the midwest, or stolen elections , or Ted Cruz's dad helping to assassinate JFK ? Yeah, I think ratio of sheep to normal folks is pretty darn average.
Leave midtown. You might see things differently.
Liberals have been claiming stolen elections for 23 years. Bush v. Gore. Then Russia stole the election for Trump in 2016.
Why is it ok only for the left?
Maybe you should look into your examples a little deeper. The hyperbole is wrong, but there are grains of truth in those claims.
-_-
Can't provide a rebuttal, hmm?
How many people do you know like this?
Have you seen the comment section in here?
Hank and Sqrlsy don't count.
Your argument is that a liberal arts education is supposed to cure you of a lack of critical thinking.
The counter argument is that there are many liberal arts majors (at this point, probably a majority) who are very much sheeple. You respond by pointing out people who didn't attend college and are sheeple.
How does that help your original argument?
There's also the "I can change my gender if I really want it bad enough" crowd. The "everything is more racist than ever before" crowd.
Plenty of sheep out there.
Meh, most of the people I see opposed to GMO corn are the anti-Monsanto liberals who see scientific methods of increasing yields and feeding a hungry world as "EVIL CORPORATION!"
>>Take a look around at your average liberal arts major.
Belle wasn't incorrect re: late 80s early 90s LA courses some were well-rounded and sometimes led to JDs and the like
Meh, most of the people I see opposed to GMO corn are the anti-Monsanto liberals who see scientific methods of increasing yields and feeding a hungry world as "EVIL CORPORATION!"
I was a liberal arts major. Math and Philosophy. But I'm also a very practical person. Now I'm an engineer. If I hadn't become an engineer I'd be a carpenter, probably.
Liberal arts can be great if you value that sort of thing, but you need to have other marketable skills if you aren't going to go into academia. And I don't really think it was worth paying $100,000 for. Even less so now when you can find pretty much any college course online for free. It's mostly just a luxury good.
You pay for the piece of paper.
This further supports my contention that government officials have nothing better to do with their time than to come up with new creative ways to wasted taxpayer money on endless attempts to do end-runs around the Constitution. Meanwhile the victims of their governmental overreach have to waste their own time, effort and money to object instead of pursuing their own potentially productive activities. So Americans lose at both ends, and the official miscreants immediately make minor, cosmetic changes in the wording of their antisocial missives and reissue them for the next round of waste.
I've heard somewhere that Eternal Vigilance is the Price of Liberty.
Oh; remember when the Constitution was changed to allow the federal government to do Commie-Education banking and turn it into armed-theft of the citizenry?
Yeah; Me neither.
F'En Nazi's and their Nazi-Empire needs to go.
At what point do they start issuing some form of contempt of court charges?
They keep doing things that they know are unconstitutional, have been told by the courts that they are unconstitutional, and then they just try to do it again a little bit later in a slightly different way. Rinse, Repeat.
Like the State & City of New York with their gun prohibitions.
Yeah - I would have thought the line would have been right around when the Biden administration reacted to "we the Supreme Court are telling you that what you're doing right now is facially unconstitutional (i.e. the eviction moratorium) but since the program expires this week we're just going to let it expire" by renewing the program.
Like the State & City of New York with their gun prohibitions.
And when Gavin Newsom proposed his "you can sue gun manufacturers even if you've never seen a gun" he openly acknowledged that it was obviously unconstitutional but asserted in no uncertain terms that he didn't care.
This is the shit people should be impeached for.
As soon as there is Republican control of Congress and the White House (and assuming the usual feeble GOP leaders have retired).
Stuck in a financial storm with no way out? The story of my recovery starts with C P -I N V E S T I G A T I O N . C O M they provided the umbrella I needed to shield me from this scam broker that had scammed me. They helped me navigate my finances, and got me the justice I deserved. I highly recommend them to everyone!!!
Now that's a different way to spam. Just spell out the website rather than link it. I can spell things out too:
F U C K-O F F . C O M
you have a problem ?
I'm thinking the problem might be random spam. We're here to read the article and the comments about the article or related topics. Not your BS.
Human spammers? Is DunningKrugger20 one of those enslaved Uyghurs we keep hearing about?
oanhjing@ certainly indicates Asian anyway.
Great, now the AI can respond back.
SpamGPT is here. Welcome to the future.
"you have a problem ?"
Yeah, with hucksters like you. Fuck off and die.
Are you always this clueless?
I can't wait until they're spamming with limericks.
The best ones are where they use ChatGPT to write something related to the article, then add their spam link either at the bottom or somewhere in the passage. I still mute their asses anyway.
Can we train the spam AI to make limericks regarding sarc?
C P -I N V E S T I G A T I O N . C O M
For a second I thought this was about Buttplug.
Same here, LOL!
These proposed regulations will protect borrowers
But screw over the taxpayers.
"But we owe it to ourselves!" - f'n ignoramuses everywhere
"Just shut up and let us love you!"
-progressives
"Also, I need your wallet and bank account number."
Good, Federal government has no business being in the education business.
They'll try again with something slightly different. And even the attempt will be used as a favorable campaign issue.
The lady in the picture with the sign “FIGHT FOR A DEBT FREE FUTURE” apparently didn’t learn much about planning ahead when she (presumably) went to college using student loans.
If she had, she would have used smaller letters or made a bigger sign so she could include the originally intended verbiage rather than truncate the message. That additional verbiage was, I’m sure, “ASAP PAY OFF YOUR STUDENT LOANS AS PROMISED”.
Also had she read more news, she would have read the recent indictment of Trump and toned down her sign – as we now know using the word “fight” (as in “we fight. We fight like hell. And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore”) makes the speaker responsible for any violence that others may engage in protesting the lack of student loan forgiveness handouts.
So much college, so little learning!
They may as well been holding signs that read "Gimme Free Stuff! Now!"
"The lady in the picture with the sign “FIGHT FOR A DEBT FREE FUTURE” apparently didn’t learn much about planning ahead when she (presumably) went to college using student loans..."
Wherever she went to school? You don't want to go there to study math and logic.
“primarily to students who attended colleges that defrauded them.”
If a court ruled they were defrauded, why didn’t the court award damages?
That's a good question. Why weren't they awarded damages?
It was a tongue in cheek question. Emma asserted that the students were “defrauded” without actual evidence. Just another example of Reason following the narrative provided by the left.
Not every student who went there would have been a part of the suit/class action. The administration also expanded the type of fraud that would qualify for relief so for some number of students who were going to get relief (and perhaps a majority even), there isn’t a court order (or lawsuit) at all. Not everybody who got relief went to Trump U an obvious scam.
"...Not everybody who got relief went to Trump U an obvious scam..."
Stuff your TDS up your ass; your head is dying for company.
And then make the world a better place, fuck off and die, shitpile.
So they weren’t actually defrauded…
Yeah, windycityattorney is a non-attorney spokesperson for the Left.
Isnt he the one at volokh who always claims non lawyers don't have the education to discuss the law or politics?
Pretty much every college misleads and defrauds people so I don't see a problem. And DOE says it's all about deregulation. Who isn't on board with that? I personally was once misled by a used car dealer. I think the US Treasury should make me whole.
And the gal on the dating site with a 20 year-old photo? Fraud, I say! And the asshole known as windycityattorney claiming to have a brain cell? Fuggitaboutit!
I no longer like Emma. Not in the least. But she's getting worse by the article, I swear.
She claims that it would "mostly" help students who were defrauded in the first paragraph. Then never investigates the level of fraud. Near the bottom, couched in the political drama of how hard it is to give away free money is what the judge said:
"Rather than merely facilitate or 'streamline' the resolution of borrower claims, the Department designed its Final Rule with a thumb on the scale to maximize the number and amount of loan discharges with little regard for the merits of the claims or the rights of schools."
So, it's NOT mostly for students who were defrauded. It's for students who know how to file a claim the right way, screw whether they were victims of fraud or not.
If that's the case, Emma, your job is to actually prove the judge wrong. I believe the judge before some random progressive shithead writing for Teen Reason.
>>unwilling to let the Education Department unilaterally spend billions of taxpayer dollars
those jerks!
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Unrelated but helpful : If you have experienced substantial financial loss as a result of fraudulent investments, it is crucial to take prompt action. Prioritize conducting comprehensive research, validating the credentials of any recovery service you may be considering, and obtaining recommendations from reliable sources before proceeding with their assistance. I have come across positive feedback about winsburg.net , which may be worth exploring.
Even a term policy?
Oh noes! The patriarchy strikes again!
Why do the faces in the photo make me think that what these eager SJWs really want is a work-free but still comfortable future?
And I realize I am channeling the patriarchy again by judging protest marching as not work.
Why, whenever there’s an article on this topic, does Reason always use a picture of the students waving their signs demanding free money? I expect that from liberal media, but Reason is *supposed* to be a libertarian publication and therefore against that sort of thing. How about next time you use a picture relating us taxpayers who don't want to be robbed, or the money being wasted, or something like that?
Did you miss the article where Emma unquestioningly went with the "more high school boys are identifying conservative" therefore there was a far greater chance of kid becoming terrorists and white supremecists?
Seriously. Didn't question that all. The best she came up with was "Don't worry, they're not really conservative so they won't become KKK members."
She's not libertarian in the least. She's a miserable, xenophobic progressive happy to shill for progressive talking points. Nothing less, and definitely nothing more.
"However, federal judges seem increasingly suspicious of that approach—and are unwilling to let the Education Department unilaterally spend billions of taxpayer dollars on loan forgiveness schemes."
Well, that probably depends. Has the 9th Circuit had a chance to rule on any such cases yet?
Tomorrow: Biden passes student loan executive order.
Well Biden can't go full dictator, yet.
Courts striking down his initiatives for student loan forgiveness is the best outcome for Biden: this way, he can pretend he did something, he can blame Republicans and their judges, and the issue is kept alive for the next election.
When you look at the history of Democrats, they rarely do anything about such issues even when they have the power. They didn't pass gay marriage, or student loan forgiveness, or abortion legislation until after the issue had been resolved by the courts.
It's actually upsetting that such a basic human right as education is not affordable to everyone. And to be honest, I feel lucky that I managed to go through my college years without constant worries about my student debt. Moreover, thanks to services like https://phdify.com/dissertation-hypothesis-writing-help, the whole educational process wasn't that exhausting for me. Not so many people get to have the same experience with education.