Connecticut Mom Jailed, Charged With Manslaughter After 2-Year-Old Dies From Window Fall
"You don't have to punish me because I am already punishing myself," says Tabitha Frank.

Tabitha Frank, a Hartford, Connecticut, mom whose 2-year-old son died from falling out a window while she was on her Uber shift, has been charged with manslaughter. The boy was home with his four older sisters. Frank had called the toddler's father to come watch the kids, but he arrived too late. The oldest child in the house was 12, an age at which many kids babysit their younger siblings.
Corneliuz Alfonso Shand Williams—called "PaPa" by his family because of his "old soul" —died two days after his July 22 fall, according to the Hartford Courant.
Frank was arrested the night of the fall and taken to jail. Her family bailed her out the next day. She appeared in court on Thursday, flanked by relatives and supporters. They filled two rows of seats.
"My baby died. My baby died, and they're looking for someone to blame," a grief-stricken Frank tells Reason. The authorities "want to hang me for something I'm already suffering from."
Frank was originally charged with 10 counts of risk of injury to a minor. Each carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison. She was released on a $100,000 bond. When the child subsequently died and the manslaughter charges were added, the prosecutors asked for a bond increase, which could put Frank back in jail. This request will be heard on August 10.
"They've charged her with manslaughter in the first degree which requires 'supreme indifference to human life,'" says Wesley Spears, an attorney for Frank. "That statute is designed for people like a drunk who goes down the highway on the wrong side of the road at a high rate of speed—that kind of thing."
Spears took the case pro bono because he has known Frank's father for many years.
Frank was working for Uber because of the flexibility it provided, says Spears. During surge pricing, she could make twice as much money, so she looked for those opportunities. The drivers call it purple time.
When her app went purple on July 22, she called her son's dad to come watch the kids. He said he would be right over, according to Spears, but subsequently fell asleep. He arrived after the boy had fallen, just as the police were getting there.
Frank and her children live in public housing. (The four daughters have since been placed with relatives.) Police described their third-floor apartment as "deplorable" and said they could smell rotting food from the stairwell. But a Department of Children and Families (DCF) worker who investigated the home a month earlier had not found it in particularly bad shape, according to the Courant.
"The children were deemed safe and the home was observed to be adequate," confirmed Ken Mysogland, a spokesperson for DCF.
But the Office of the Child Advocate, which oversees DCF, has called the death "preventable and tragic."
Tragic? Indisputably. But preventable? Well, that requires hindsight. The impulse after an accident is always to blame someone.
"Usually it's the mother," says Diane Redleaf, a longtime civil rights lawyer and legal consultant to Let Grow, the nonprofit I founded. "We seem to have no tolerance for tragic accidents that don't have a wrongdoer."
The night before the boy fell, he had been eating ice cream outside with his sisters and playing in a kiddie pool they set up. Relatives told the Courant that Frank tried to make this summer as sweet as possible for her kids, especially after the all the confinement during COVID-19.
The funeral is planned for next week. Frank's sister has set up a GoFundMe to cover expenses. It has raised over $600 so far.
On the phone, Frank says she could understand being prosecuted if she had been an abusive or unloving mother.
"But I kissed the top of his head, and the bottom of his feet," she says. "You don't have to punish me because I am already punishing myself."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Surprised they’re not blaming the father, since he’s lower on the intersectionality scale.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Clearly the public housing authority is to blame.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
I expect a sympathetic jury to free her.
hence the 10 other counts tacked on. get that plea deal oh mighty prosecutor.
If i were on the jury, based on the circumstances as described in the article, i would not convict.
Too bad the jury can't go beyond not convicting and recommend that the judge sanction the prosecutor.
^THIS^ ( if all facts of the case support what this looks like)
With rare exception (like military trials), a juror is free to politely and directly address a judge in open court. The judge can try to silence the juror, but doing that will trigger a legal challenge by both sides. Ultimately, the juror will be heard.
In some states, jurors are encouraged to directly question witnesses, as well.
I expect she should have never been charged. Many kids babysit at 12. I did. My daughter watched 4 young children overnight at eleven while their parents were on a snowmobile trip.
But we arrest and prosecute on outcomes now, not on negligence or crimes. If something has a bad outcome it must be a crime is the current thought. It is why kids can't walk a block to the park and play at 12 years old. This mom lost a child, she deserves empathy not prosecution unless there is something else we are not being told.
Yet we see everyday criminals commit crimes with criminal intent, and walk away without out charges or slaps on the wrist. Our system is seriously broken.
"The children were deemed safe and the home was observed to be adequate," confirmed Ken Mysogland, a spokesperson for DCF.
If the house really was deplorable, the social worker should be charged too.
Tabitha Frank, a Hartford, Connecticut, mom whose 2-year-old son died from falling out a window while she was on her Uber shift, has been charged with manslaughter. The boy was home with his four older sisters. Frank had called the toddler's father to come watch the kids, but he arrived too late. The oldest child in the house was 12, an age at which many kids babysit their younger siblings.
Hold it right there for a moment. There were 5 kids in the apartment while she was out. While the eldest may be 12, and it's a good age to leave kids alone to babysit, having to watch over 4 siblings, including the 2-year old, may be a little much for the 12-year old. I remember being 12 and watching over my sibling. He could be a handful by himself. Once you have multiple kids to look after, it becomes difficult for one to watch over them at that age.
That said, manslaughter might be a bit much, but there is neglect here.
I think we need more information. How high was the window sill? Was there a strong screen or other barrier? Was the window open? Was the 2 year old in a playpen?
We have the mother's skin color. "Mothering while black". That's ALL we need to know!
/Sarc
I'm pretty sure the child that died was also black.
If only we could PUNISH-PUNISH-PUNISH that black mother some MORE, maybe we could bring her child BACK, then?
hate to think of what they'd charge her with if she was white ---- or [god forbid] a Trump supporter!!
The point is, if this was driven by racism, why would racists care so much about a dead black child?
They obviously do NOT care about the dead black child, if they have 2 brain cells to rub together! THE CHILD IS DEAD AND GONE, AND NOTHING, NO PUNISHMENT OF THE LIVING, WILL BRING THE CHILD BACK! So, for sane and benevolent people, the dead child has no relevance to punishment, and to people who have "punishment boners" (punishment lust, which is all to common, and worthless).
The racism comes in where the rich, powerful, and white aren't likewise punished. See comments further below:
Ornithorhynchus
I don’t recall Eric Clapton going to jail when this happened to his kid.
SQRLSY One
Good point! One set of rules for the rich, famous, and powerful, and one (vastly DIFFERENT) set of rules for the peons!
Wait, did some shit-eating moron think that the siblings were somehow culpable?
It’s bulk-standard Reason bullshit all the way down.
The oldest child in the house was 12, an age at which many kids babysit their younger siblings.
Yeah, we aren’t here because a 12 yr. old was watching their younger siblings, we’re here because there’s a corpse of a 2 yr. old in the yard.
Edit: This is a new, and really bad, dimension to Lenore's work.
If the mother had been there and this happened would she have been charged with manslaughter? No? Then we're here because the 12 year old was watching their younger siblings.
The obvious answer seems to be that if the mother had been there she would've been charged with manslaughter considering she was charged without being there and, more critically, the 12 yr. old wasn't charged either way.
There were 3 other older sisters there as well do you even know their ages? Do we only get to hear about the 12 yr. old because 12 is some sort of mystical number?
I don't know their ages but there's a picture. Just imagine someone who has a kid every couple of years.
You say she would have been charged with manslaughter either way. I really doubt it. The risk wasn't the window itself or CPS would have done something about that when they visited the previous month. (And of course they can't charge the 12 year old; that would signal that the 12 year old *was* old enough to take responsibility, which would eviscerate the case against the mother.)
The mother was charged with 10 counts of risk of injury to a minor. 2 counts per kid. Based on leaving them alone. Which means she is being charged with leaving the 12 year old alone.
I don’t know their ages
So, to be clear, you're affirming that I was correct in my assessment and you're professing your ignorance (and throwing in CPS's competence in for good measure) in defense of the death of a 2 yr. old?
JFC, at least Franks is remorseful. You people are just fucking ghouls.
Yes, I am professing my ignorance as to the exact ages of the other children. They are less than 12 and more than 2. Do you know their exact ages and have a point for which those exact ages are relevant, or did you just want to call me ignorant?
Do you know their exact ages and have a point for which those exact ages are relevant
I didn't call you ignorant. I called you a ghoul. Franks is ignorant. You're worse. My rather explicit point, that even a 12 yr. old would understand, is that their age is irrelevant. And your behavior between not knowing their age and asking *me* to establish relevance, whether I call you ignorant, a ghoul, or not, is self-evident.
We're here because there's a dead 2 yr. old in the yard. The fact that there was a 12 yr. old, uncharged, is as irrelevant as the inclusion of the fact that Uber drivers call surge pricing "purple time". It. just. doesn't. matter.
I agree that the ages of the other 3 were irrelevant! But you're the one who asked:
Forgive me for thinking your questions were relevant.
If we agree that the ages of the middle children don't matter, then why are you complaining *again* that I don't know them?
So your true point was that the age of *all* the children, including the oldest, is irrelevant? I disagree, then. The age of the oldest is, in fact, relevant. If the oldest was 10 or the oldest was 14 I think that would change the facts drastically. The fact that there was a 12 year old indicates that there was someone who might be considered responsible.
It depends on individual maturity, but many people consider 12 to be old enough to watch their siblings for a short period of time, in their own house, while the other parent is on their way there.
Yeah, one on one, the 12 year old is more than capable.
4 on one? That is a LOT to ask of a preteen.
I don't recall Eric Clapton going to jail when this happened to his kid.
Good point! One set of rules for the rich, famous, and powerful, and one (vastly DIFFERENT) set of rules for the peons!
Different jurisdiction, but I totally get what you're saying.
If he left four younger children with a 12-year-old, perhaps he should have.
Get on your knees and drop those panties, filly! I'm bored and horny!
Heeee-awwwwn!
He wasn't even there. The mom left the kid with both a nanny and a maid while she was having a bath.
You're a real piece of shit aren't you.
If that is true, why was he mentioned in this context?
Your resentment of your betters diminishes you further.
The mom in that manslaughter story wasn't there either.
You remain a real piece of shit don't you.
If Clapton left his children with two competent adults, and was not there when the child died, that circumstance is readily distinguishable from one involving a dead two-year-old, a 12-year-old "babysitter," and no adult in sight.
Antisocial, contrarian right-wing misfits are among my favorite culture war casualties.
Carry on, clingers. So far as your betters permit. Until replacement.
Tell me about it. He lets his kid fall to his death and *we* get punished for it.
English Guitarist, Absentee Father and Heroin Addict, Appears on MTV, Wins 3 Grammys, After 4-Year-Old Dies From Window Fall
That’s the difference between a 2 year old and a 4 year old.
That’s the difference between a 2 year old and a 4 year old.
Tell it to buttplug.
The dead must be buried, out of respect. Hit the GoFundMe link.
They are asking for generosity for a “celebration of life,” not a burial. That’s weird.
I’m not sure a party is an appropriate use of other people’s money.
"I’m not sure a party is an appropriate use of other people’s money."
"Celebration of life" is what memorial services are commonly called in the black community. People do bring food, but it's not a party, per se. Different cultures express grief differently, as becomes immediately clear when you attend your first black funeral.
Thank you, I didn’t know that.
I guarantee this will all amount to nothing. Actual criminals get off with slaps on the wrist, cooler heads will ultimately prevail.
This is called prosecutorial discretion by people who enjoy sovereign immunity. They don't care. They don't have to.
Or sound judgment.
At any of several points in the last 12 yrs. apparently.
Who but Lenore could unearth the 2023 remake of Bessie Smith's 1927 tragedy "Send Me To The 'Lectric Chair"?
The case for abortion.
I'm not sure how killing the 2 year old 3 years sooner helps.
Oh sure. When a woman needs to get an abortion for any reason at all it's a human rights issue, but when Dad's nap gets interrupted because a toddler dies, no one gives a shit.
I note that he's only specified as the toddler's father, not the other four girls. And the kid's only two and she's living in public housing.
OK, maybe "abortion" is too harsh, but someone please for the love of fuck get this woman an IUD. Free vasectomies / tubals after the third child born out of wedlock or on welfare? Yes, I know they wouldn't technically be "free" but they'd be a fuck of a lot cheaper than what the potential fourth kid is going to cost us for the rest of its life.
I note that he’s only specified as the toddler’s father, not the other four girls. And the kid’s only two and she’s living in public housing.
I probably should've put a sarc tag after my statement. I note that she asked him to be right over, he said "OK" and then promptly took a nap.
Seems like even from a pretty libertarian perspective, as part of the public housing contract, one tube tied and one snip for every kid conceived beyond replacement would tightrope any issues with forced sterilization or genocide or sexual/gender inequality and fall pretty squarely in the realm of contractually protecting the investment in social housing and promoting the general welfare (not that we should be providing public housing to begin with).
What kind of adult goes to sleep when asked to watch their daughter? Only a junkie, stoner, or alcoholic. This is the kind of person the mother relied on to watch her kids.
That’s why she’s on trial.
She shouldn't have left the apartment until Baby Daddy arrived - that's a crucial lack of judgment.
BTW - the author's sentence "The oldest child in the house was 12, an age at which many kids babysit their younger siblings" is a wild generalization. I grew up in the wild and crazy 70s and no parent we knew ever let a 12-year-old home alone to take care of the sibs. That sort of thing usually started happening around age 16.
I grew up in the wild and crazy 70s and no parent we knew ever let a 12-year-old home alone to take care of the sibs. That sort of thing usually started happening around age 16.
That may've been the case on the compound on which you grew up, but since "women started entering the workforce" in the 50s and 60s, latchkey kids have generally been a thing. Mom and Dad both worked, and I or I and my brother coming home after about 5th Grade (for me) coming home to an empty house for 30-45 min. was not uncommon.
The more critical aspect of it is that the number and age of siblings in the house at the time is largely irrelevant. I *know* your parents fell asleep or got preoccupied with housework or whatever while you were young. Again, we aren't here because Mom is an Uber driver and Dad took a nap, we're here because there's a corpse in the yard. If she'd thrown the kid out the window, we wouldn't care in the least how many siblings there were except as to whether she tried to throw them out too.
Yeah, but was your little brother 2 years old?
I mean, that's really young. It was pretty common for kids 8-10 to run around unsupervised. But 2 years old? That's a full time job to keep track of.
Really? Not even "watch them for a half hour until someone else gets here"? My parents would be serving a life sentence.
I took an official Red Cross Babysitting class when I was in jr high. It taught that you could babysit during the day at age 10 and at night at 11. This was the early 80's.
"Frank and her children live in public housing."
Now we know who is to blame. But they can claim QI.
There's a certain group of people that obviously lack critical judgement. It's why they steal and high jack cars, loot stores, murder each other at alarming rates and generally cause every other sort of mayhem.
So where's Al Charlatan and Ben Dump to defend this po' woman?
I'm surprised the clowns at MSNBC or CNN haven't blamed trump for this.
I suppose Jackoff Smith will add this to his charges.
I’ve known a couple of well off, educated white parents who tragically lost very young children to accidents-one ran over her kid in the driveway, the other’s 2 year old choked to death on a carrot (don’t know if the parents were home when this happened or if the child was under the nanny’s supervision). Anyway, neither were charged with anything (though all were married and didn’t have 5 kids).
I think if anyone is to blame, it's whoever designed the housing project to have a 3rd floor window open so someone could fall out of it.
With that said, it's not great to leave a 2 year old alone with a 12 year old.
Pressing charges in this case demonstrates the evil desires of law enforcement to destroy people's lives just because they can.
I think someone in the prosecutor's office is looking for a promotion and sees this as a win - win.
All I know for sure is I am not hearing and I will not hear a Goddamn word against those of us who are Childfree By Choice.
This woman at very least is clearly homicidally negligent and this unspeakably inexcusable death should not be without consequence. What? I can’t rightly say.
But I do know that Lenore Skenazy does no service to the cause of “Free-Range Kids” by apple-polishing. "Free-Range" is not and should not be a synonym for "gone feral!"
I also know that our criminal justice system is homicidally and pathologically negligent in the protection of the lives of children.
My own local area has had a recent shocking double bill of both Religion and State representatives and agents accused of sexually preying on children, with at least two of them now out in public on bond:
9 arrests made in Charlotte-area child sexual abuse cases since March
Since March, WCNC Charlotte has covered nine child sexual abuse cases in the greater Charlotte area, and at least six of the suspects held positions of power. Author: Julia Kauffman Published: 11:47 PM EDT August 4, 2023 Updated: 12:18 AM EDT August 5, 2023https://www.wcnc.com/article/news/crime/charlotte-area-child-abuse-cases-arrests/275-0ad88433-da82-481d-bde8-b892702c972f
I’m just glad I never brought children into a Hellscape world such as this and I hope parents or someone can keep children safe from a world where authority isn’t questioned enough and where senseless death happens with a shrug.
They left out the part of CPS being called on her dozens of times in the past