The Southern Poverty Law Center Makes Millions Trafficking Hate
The Center has gotten rich in part thanks to its "hate map," which smears many good people.

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) just released a report claiming there are 1,225 hate and anti-government groups in America. These groups cause "fear and pain [in] Black, brown, and LGBTQ communities."
The SPLC lists such groups on its "hate map."
I once believed the Center. Well-meaning people still do. Apple once gave them $1 million.
But what donors don't know is that today, the SPLC smears good people, not just "haters."
Ayaan Hirsi Ali grew up Muslim in Somalia, but now she criticizes radical Islam, and sometimes (maybe this is what really bothers the SPLC) fraternizes with American conservatives. The Center put Hirsi Ali on its list.
The Center also smears the Family Research Council. I sometimes disagree with the Council. But they don't belong on a "hate map."
"When they don't agree with you politically, they're going to list you as a 'hater,'" says council Executive Vice President Jerry Boykin in my new video.
"You are a hater!" I tell him. "You hate gays."
"No, I don't hate gay people!" he responds. "I know gay people, and I've worked with gay people." The Council merely opposed gay marriage, an opinion they shared with Joe Biden, Barack Obama, and Bill and Hillary Clinton.
One man became so enraged by what the SPLC wrote, he went to the Council's headquarters to kill people. He shot a security guard. Fortunately, that wounded guard stopped him before he could shoot anyone else.
"He told the judge that he was there to kill as many of us as possible because we were a 'hate group,'" says Boykin.
The Center also smears the Ruth Institute, a Christian group that believes adoption agencies should first try to place children with straight couples.
I told Ruth Institute President Jennifer Morse that she must be "a hater."
"I like gay people!" she laughs. "I have no problem with gay people! That's not the issue…. There could be cases where the best person for a particular child would be their Uncle Harry and his boyfriend…. But we owe it to the children to give them the best we can, which generally is a married mother and father."
When the SPLC put the Institute on its hate map, its bank cut them off.
"You're an organization that promotes hate, violence…," wrote the bank. "Therefore we're not doing business with you."
The Ruth Institute and Family Research Council are still on the hate list.
"There's no appeal. I sure don't know how you get off," Morse complains.
I suspect the Center keeps its hate list long to bring in lots of money.
The Center pays some of its people more than $400,000 a year.
"More than my entire annual budget," Morse says. "So yeah, whatever they're doing—it pays."
It sure does. Harper's Magazine once reported that the Center was the richest civil rights group in America, one that spends most of its time and energy trying to raise more money.
They promised they'd stop fundraising once their endowment reached $55 million. But when they reached $55 million, they raised their goal to $100 million, saying $100 million would allow them to "cease costly fundraising."
But when they reached $100 million—they didn't cease. They collected $200 million. Then $400 million. Now they have $730 million.
Yet they still raise money.
"Much of which is in offshore accounts in the Caymans," says Boykin.
It's true. You can see it on their tax forms.
Today the SPLC even smears groups like Moms for Liberty and Moms for America, calling them anti-government extremists because they oppose sexually explicit content in schools, and seek school board seats to try to "stop…school districts [from] disregarding the opinions of parents."
Give me a break. The Center puts Moms for America on its "hate map," but not Antifa, the hate group that beats up people on the right.
Today the Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate group itself.
It's a left-wing, money-grabbing smear machine.
COPYRIGHT 2023 BY JFS PRODUCTIONS INC.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Talking about Biden (D) shitting his pants is apparently a smear campaign.
He's on the skids.
His administration went from having some pepto a-bismol.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,300 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,300 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
I earn 200 dollars per hour working from home on an online job. I never thought I could accomplish it, but my best friend makes $10,000 per month doing this profession and that I learn more about it. . .
.
.
.
Here’s how she did it……………………… https://Www.Coins71.Com
Steamy Ray Vaughn agrees.
That all depends on what came out in the end.
Definitely a sign you're using the "memory hole" improperly.
"Today the Southern Poverty Law Center is a hate group itself.
It's a left-wing, money-grabbing smear machine."
C'mon, John. Tell us how you really feel.
I'm making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning sixteen thousand US dollars a month by working on the connection, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website... http://www.Payathome7.com
As an individual, rather than an institution or organization, how does one go about getting oneself listed on the SPLC hate list. Inquiring minds want to know. I want to know. I think I ought to be there, because being on their "list" would be an excellent example of being defined by one's enemies.
You beat me to the punch! I was just about to ask the same question.
+1
The Southern Poverty Law Center is neither Southern nor a Law Center and is definitely not in Poverty. Nor are they for racial or sexual equality, judging from their workplace harassment practices.
By the same token, The Family Research Council and the American Family Association are neither pro-Family, nor pro-Research, nor pro-American. Not on the level of Westboro Baptist Church, but they still suck.
You'd be mistaken. The Family Research Council and American Family Association warned us about the absurdities of transgenderism. The left wants to be divisive with their identity politics, and completely want to extend that divisiveness to families. Good on those two organizations to reject that.
Nothing stokes more hatred than government and politics. SPLC and the US government should be at the top of the list of those spreading hate.
Only because everything is political. If government wasn't involved in every aspect of our lives, politics would be a lot more civil.
You know, I love to poke fun at the SPLC just as much as the next guy, but seriously, does anyone really pay attention to them any more? I mean, sure, back in the 90s they were featured as "experts" on NPR literally like every 15 minutes. But these days? I'm not sure of NPR even takes them seriously any more... and when you've lost NPR.
If they're being used by banks to remove "hate groups" then you can be assured they are being used plenty it's just nobody is publicizing where they get their hit lists from.
^This^
Someone obviously still takes them seriously.
they – along with all the democrat party front group “fact checker” organizations – have been fashioned into the censorship and deplatforming industrial complex to further left-progressive and WEF goals (AND to punish any that oppose their goals and efforts.).
I don’t think that’s even debatable at this point.
Democrats cite them often. As mentioned banks. Used by the social media censorship agencies. I've seen the sea lion libertarians here cite them. And they gets 10 of millions in donations every year. So yes.
does anyone really pay attention to them any more?
Corporations that want to keep their ESG scores.
Someone's still funding them.
Where's that little fucker Soros (and Soros, Jr.)?
Dead or dying, I hope.
NPR switched its news feed from SPLC to the Nunavut Intellectual Poverty Law Center , because anything Southern might be Confederate.
All sound criticism. The SPLC should be shunned.
Except this part:
but not Antifa, the hate group that beats up people on the right
It's okay for Antifa to hate fascists. They're fucking fascists, after all.
It's OK (or at least not my problem) for anyone to hate whoever they want. Beating them up is another matter.
If that's true, is it okay to ballbat communists? I mean, they're communists, after all.
I'm a gonna say yes.
Marxists have no right to exist. So go nuts.
But can they be redeemed?
They’re fucking fascists, after all.
Who are you fucking? Never mind, we already know.
You know who else should be shunned?
Everyone I know who's ever expressed allegiance to Antifa swears that there is no Antifa. If the people taking to the streets as Antifa were actually fighting fascists, it might not have been a bad thing. When the reality was that they seemed to define anyone to the right of "The Squad" as "Fascist", and many of them seemed more interested in the violent suppression of any ideas other than their own; really more counter-fascist than anti-fascist when it came down to brass tacks.
Where was Antifa when operatives from FBI, DHS, HHS, and CDC were sending out "requests" for censorship by the thousands to known willing collaborators within the various "platform" companies who collectively controlled 90%+ of all US public internet discourse? Recruiting/coercing private sector operations to to the "dirty work" that's not allowed to the government directly is literally the other major component of fascism aside from the use of threats and physical attacks to silence the expression of ideas which are inconvenient to the expansion of the authoritarian state, and yet now the people who claim to hate fascists are mostly in the camp that the twitter files revelations amount to a "nothing burger", or even worse are the ones who have been demanding stronger legal mandates encouraging social media censorship.
A "hot take" that would likely enrage about 70-80% of almost any room (in part because it's likely so close to the truth" is that the right is now using the term "woke" as casually/ignorantly as the left was tossing around the term "fascist" during the trump administration (especially the summer of 2020).
If there were any group actually opposing true Fascists when and where they show up, that would be admirable. What we got with "Antifa" was a gang of leftist (often marxist) activists choosing to call whatever they happend to hate in the give moment "fascism", similarly to how SPLC at some point transitioned from a legitimate anti-hate watchdog to a shakedown racket which designates deviation in excess of some small fraction from their chosen "acceptable" worldview as "hate" for fun (and apparently profit as well?).
About Antifa:
The common argument is, Antifa is not a formal organisation, and therefore does not belong on a list of hateful organisations.
Like how fascism isn't a hate group.
The main problem is they don't have official ID cards. Ask Mike.
They’re just a clump of terrorist cells.
Abort! Abort!
Neither do fascists. Or the alt-right. But yet, we seem to always be able to sharply define who's fascist and alt-right, and therefore should be condemnified.
Saw this on Youtube before it finally showed up on Reason. Why does Reason need to rely on Stossel sharing his work with them to address stuff like this?
Why does Reason need to rely on Stossel sharing his work with them to address stuff like this?
Because there's more important things to report on. Like abortions, sex workers, food trucks, Mexicans, and ass sex.
Well, you can’t say Reason doesn’t have clear cut priorities.
Groups like SPLC and BLM are the main reason why as a society we'll never stop blabbing about "MuH RaCiSmZ." They make way too much money off of it to ever stop promoting it.
John, if your goal is to get donors to stop giving them money you probably should not have bothered. The people who give them millions of dollars don’t care that they’re a hate group themselves. The people who give them millions of dollars hate hate. They don’t see the irony of that at all. They hate the bad guys and love anyone who also hates the bad guys. If your bank refuses to do business with you because someone put you on their “hate list” you needed a different bank anyway. There is no constitutional right to do business with a particular bank. The only solution to stupidity is to make sure the system supports as much non-stupid competition as possible.
Tell that to Nigel Farage
No, the solution is to get rid of these Marxist democrats. Problem solved.
That's what I said! And also get rid of these Nazi republicans!
To think there's was a time when the DailyKos talked of the SPLC offshore accounts in the Cayman Islands back in 2010. I'm surprised they didn't pulled that article. https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2010/11/26/923486/-
How many million dollar mansions do the executives of the SPLC own?
Maybe as many as some of the BLM founders. Btw, there's was that old article from 2019 about one of the SPLC founders Morris Dees who's been memory holed for being a womanizer.
https://www.takimag.com/article/memory-holing-morris-dees/
Among FRC’s many anti-LGBT statements devoid of facts are their linkages of gay people to pedophiles, their call for exporting gay people from the U.S., their position that there should be criminal penalties for homosexuality, and their thoroughly debunked claim that one can change their sexual orientation.
Yes, that's *hate*.
What exactly do you mean when you say "hate"? I feel like the word gets thrown around too much in this context. In my mind hate is a powerful, passionate emotional state. It seems perfectly possible to hold the views you describe in a dispassionate way.
" linkages of gay people to pedophiles"
When literally every anti-grooming bill is labeled as an attack on the gay community, perhaps they are on to something.
The Southern Poverty Law Center Makes Millions Trafficking Hate
So do the DNC and the RNC. Plus they get a whole lot of coercive power too.
Gotta give these race hustlers some cover, right Groomer Jeffy?
Both sides!!!!
Not only the SPLC but the ADL is just as bad. Anyone can be labeled anti-Semite for disliking bagels and lox. Or maybe they criticized Isrealhell for bombing the Palestinians ( the real Semites).
OK, if you don't want to be called anti-Semitic, how about anti-Jewish, would that work?
SPLC is to the ADL like PETA is to the HSUS
Palestinians are simply Jordanians that Jordan does not want.
Socialist Punk Lie Center.
Ah smell the hypocrisy! Reason foundation is funded by the Koch brothers. Of course SPLC is a target.
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
How could you mention this and leave out the bag of Chic-fil-a sandwiches this looser had with him?
Did he have a fire extinguisher or wood chipper with him?
These folks hate anyone who disagrees with them, so of course they assume that their opponents share the same deranged attitude.
Obama and Biden's Brownshirts, along with BLM and antifa.
Because we need more love groups, like NAMBLA
HA! lol
If the right starts fighting like the left . . . investigate the SPLC, seize their assets, revoke their nonprofit status, find crimes (easy to do, remember 3 felonies a day), lock them up.
All of the groups cited in the post are hate groups. The AHA Foundation is borderline. For example, if you have a group that thinks that hetero couples are inherently better parents then homo couples, that is a hate group.
It is not hate to argue that children are better off with a father and a mother. There's a excellent article I encountered to support the notion. There's simply things a mother can do that a father can't, and vice versa. If you hate the truth, you will regret it.
Your argument is akin to thinking a woman can compete in the NBA just as well as a man--that's delusional, MollyGodiva.
Here are two exposés "outing" the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). Both articles are from the Capital Research Center (CRC), a right-wing charity-monitoring nonprofit -- definitely biased against SPLC and similar outfits. So take what CRC says with a grain of salt.
But here's the thing: If what the Capital Research Center asserts is NOT true, SPLC supposedly has 75 attorneys on the payroll. They are well suited to sue anybody about anything. I can't find any response from SPLC to the CRC exposés. Moreover, the MSM, which works for free as the SPLC's PR department, seems strangely disinterested in doing their own research into these accusations.
Among other claims, the Capital Research Center asserts that SPLC has millions of dollars squirreled away in Caribbean accounts. Moreover, CPLC apparently refuses to label Antifa a hate group, even after the liberal mayor of Berkeley finally conceded that Antifa should be treated as an organized crime gang. In addition, CRC says that SPLC spends almost no money on doing what they CLAIM they do -- providing legal assistance to the downtrodden.
At the end of the 2nd article there's a three-minute video from CRC about SPLC. CRC fully credits the ORIGINAL SPLC with doing good work, fighting the KKK and other violent, bigoted groups. But supposedly SPLC ran out of villains, so to keep the donations flowing, they now target primarily right-wing groups -- tagging them as "haters" and purveyors of violence. Not surprisingly, the MSM eats it up, mindlessly parroting whatever press release SPLC puts out.
https://capitalresearch.org/article/splc-wont-label-antifa-as-hate-group/?blm_aid=67083
https://capitalresearch.org/article/the-ivory-spires-of-the-splc-poverty-palace/
I like Stossel and will send money if he runs for office on an LP ticket. And I agree with his view of the panhandling outfit in question. All I want to know is: how does their hatemongering make them any different from the GOP and DEM factions of The Looter Kletocracy?
The big difference is that EVERYONE knows politics and politicians are partisan. The LAST thing Democrat and GOP leaders can claim is objectivity. No one views them as neutral sources of information.
SPLC passes itself off as an objective, nonpartisan source of information. That's the way the press treats them. And they are dead wrong.
It sounds to me that the SPLC has often broadcast libels - claiming that someone hates others is not just an "opinion based on revealed facts" but an assertion of a fact. These have ill effects such as causing a bank to drop one target, and a nut to try to murder members of another target. Why aren't they being sued for tens of billions?