Momfluencer Sentenced to 90 Days in Jail Over False Kidnapping Report
"Nobody is abducting 1- and 4-year-old kids into sex trafficking," says the director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center.

Katie Sorensen—the Petaluma, California, "momfluencer" who claimed her kids were the victims of an attempted abduction in a Michael's parking lot—has been sentenced to 90 days of jail time. The New York Times reports that 30 of those days must be served in the jail itself; the rest can be done in a work-release program.
It's fair to wonder whether locking up people (even briefly) who pose no danger to others is a good use of public resources; the U.S. has the unfortunate distinction of incarcerating a greater share of its population than any other nation in the world. This case was not entirely victimless, however: Sorensen identified a Latino couple, Sadie and Eddie Martinez, as the would-be kidnappers. They lived under that cloud of suspicion during the police investigation, and even now, they are "more hesitant when we leave the house," according to Elle.
Here's what happened. On December 7, 2020, Sorensen called the cops. She reported that she had been shopping at a craft shop with her kids, ages one and four, when a couple seemed to focus on them and followed her out to her car. She was certain the couple was going to snatch her kids.
The cops checked out the story and found it baseless. Sorensen then took to social media with a video that garnered millions of views.
Katie Sorensen says strangers tried to kidnap her kids outside the Petaluma @MichaelsStores after following them around inside. Her @instagram video (partial here) has hit 2M views. @petaluma_police investigating. She & @PollyDad speak out to @KTVU 5:15, 6:15, 7:30 p.m. pic.twitter.com/cG0wnm2JgQ
— Henry K. Lee (@henrykleeKTVU) December 15, 2020
"Monday of this week, my children were the attempted targets of attempted [kidnapping], which is such a weird thing to even vocalize," she said. "But it happened. And I want to share that story with you, in an effort to raise awareness of what signs to look for."
Sorensen raised so much awareness that the police reopened the investigation. This time, they reviewed surveillance camera footage, identifying a husband and wife—Sadie Vega-Martinez and Eddie Martinez—as suspects. The couple cooperated with the cops and once again, the kidnapping case was closed.
At that point, the authorities turned on Sorensen. She was tried on three counts of falsely reporting a crime and convicted on one of those charges.
According to The New York Times,
Sorensen was also sentenced to 12 months of informal probation. During this time, she was ordered to have no social media presence, to submit to warrantless search and seizure of her electronic devices and to complete a four-hour implicit bias training program, in addition to paying various fines and fees, the district attorney said.
Again, that's a steep punishment. Maybe instead of losing access to social media for a year, Sorensen could help spread awareness—even on TikTok—about the unlikeliness of such kidnappings, and help put fellow moms at ease.
"Nobody is abducting 1- and 4-year-old kids into sex trafficking," says David Finkelhor, director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center.
Now there's a message that needs to go viral.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Maybe a mental health exam...
Or a hard smack across the head.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,400 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link————————————————>>> http://Www.OnlineCash1.Com
Everyone on instagram could benefit from that.
I'm picturing the slapping scene from Airplane.
I am making $90 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. https://www.apprichs.com
For sound economic perspective go to https://honesteconomics.substack.com/
Seem to me that the penalty for a false accusation should be the same as the penalty for the crime you're falsely accusing. She got off light.
That’s how my libertopia defines it. You try to frame someone for murder, you get the maximum punishment which could have resulted had you been successful. Not what might have been likely, not even what eventually did happen, but the maximum which could have happened.
Here, that would have been kidnapping. Since no other crime (rape, murder, torture) was alleged, those are not the issue at stake.
"You try to frame someone for murder,"
Frame? She misconstrued the situation out of fear and panic and a desire for attention. Bad enough, but hardly framing which involves planting evidence, lying, accusing people known to be innocent etc.
Her testimony was evidence enough to open a police investigation, and she doubled down with her blog hysteria. That's framing and perjury in my book. You may think you're some clever law-talking guy; most people think lying to start an investigation is lying and framing, whatever legal mantra you recite over it.
I think you'd be hard pressed to convince a jury that this was a frameup.
I agree with your idea that someone who frames another for murder should face similar penalties, but this is not a fameup. It's entirely plausible that the momfluencer sincerely believed that her children were in danger of being kidnapped.
Bullshit. This is the kind of thing that gets innocent people killed in a no-knock warrant. You have influence. you take responsibility for using it.
Not a frameup.
"This is the kind of thing that gets innocent people killed in a no-knock warrant. "
I agree. it's a bad thing to do.
The only difference is that a frame-up is intentional. The end result is the same.
Intention is big. As big as the difference between involuntary manslaughter and murder in the first degree.
If the cops cannot conduct a no-knock warrant on an innocent household without getting someone killed, that’s on the cops, and not the blondie moron who panicked and called them.
It's on both of them.
It's on society as well. We're in the midst of a social panic about the safety of children. There's also an anxiety about protecting the innocence of children. (I suspect the rise of social media has played a role) It probably won't last forever but while it lasts people like this momfluencer will fall victim to it. I said it before. She was motivated by fear, panic and a need for attention on social media. It was society that fed her (and many many more besides) fears and anxiety.
Is it? We're in a country where homeowners are likely to own guns, and authorized to use deadly force against home intruders, and police carry guns and are authorized to use deadly force when they encounter armed resistance. Thus every no-knock warrant carries risk of a deadly shooting of an innocent person, despite the best intentions of everyone involved. This is why no-knock warrants should be illegal in most or all cases, which sadly is not the situation in most states today.
This is also the kind of thing where people sometimes take matters into their own hands. People see the accusation, they don't look for the retraction. The people who were accused will have this hanging over them for a long time. I agree she got off light.
"It's fair to wonder whether locking up people (even briefly) who pose no danger to others is a good use of public resources;"
This is a good use of resources. Lenora, how many articles have you written about parents being arrested for letting their children do ordinary things? People like this are why that happens. God knows how many people could have their lives ruined because of her lies.
I think in this case it would be sufficient to say that (a) she committed a crime, and (b) it was related to sex trafficking.
Therefore, she has to register as a sex offender.
It also happens to be one of the things that would have happened to the people she falsely accused.
I'm not sure I like this. There's a fine line between a crime being falsely reported, and crime occurring but there being insufficient evidence to make an arrest. I could easily see people falling on the wrong side of that line when reporting actual crimes.
"Beyond a reasonable doubt" comes to mind.
I agree - which is why I didn't say that every failed prosecution should result in jail time for the accuser. But when you're at the point of having charges filed against you for filing a false police report, you're way past an innocent mistake.
Oops, didn't see at first that she fingered someone to wreck their lives. They should walk away with every red cent she has.
-jcr
@PollyDad? Any self respecting man that goes by that handle... yeah...
Watched Black Mirror Arkangel episode last night.
Katie would happily use that technology if available.
Does she still have her kids? Because if the Martinez couple had kids, the state would have taken them.
She'll do little time and has her kids.
Flexing that white privilege.
"(For two years).....We were forever labeled child abusers," Sadie Vega-Martinez, mother of five, testified at the trial. She and her husband were pointed out as potential kidnappers.
30 days 'jail (fluff)' time was a gift. - she should have done two years minimum, same as the innocent family had to 'serve'.
Compelled speech? Where are your principles?
And all compelled speech would have done is ramp up the idiocy. It would be the most counter-productive thing possible. A really stupid idea.
No, she got off light. She should at least have spent two years in hell for the damage she did inflict, and she should have been punished for the kidnapping she tried to inflict.
Sorensen raised so much awareness that the police reopened the investigation.
But remember, it's the legions of frivolous hyperlitigious trolls we erected Section 230 to guard against that are the real threats to freedom.
"are the real threats to freedom."
Threat to profits. Lawsuits cost money, time and energy.
This article gives some more details. Apparently, she made up the story to get more followers and make more money to cover parenting costs. And she is a QAnon conspiracy believer:
https://lawandcrime.com/crime/momfluencer-and-qanon-adherent-sentenced-to-jail-after-falsely-accusing-latino-couple-of-trying-to-kidnap-her-kids/
I wonder if a civil lawsuit is in her future.
""It's fair to wonder whether locking up people (even briefly) who pose no danger to others is a good use of public resources;..."
Normally I'm all for what Lenore has to opine. But this is plain wrong. She sicked the cops on an innocent couple. And did so in a Susan Smith manner, invoking the scary dark skinned person trope that makes the accusation all the more toxic.
She needs some real time away from her family, and her computer, to let it sink in that there are real lives of real people she is 'influencing'.
I think you're misreading it. When I initially read it, I thought it was a comment in favor of the broader libertarian idea of decriminalizing all non-violent behavior, but set aside as this case, prior to the police being called, contained no violence or crime. In that vein, I don't think she's saying the momfluencer shouldn't be locked up, I think she's saying that even lone dudes in trenchcoats loitering in parking lots posing no danger beyond leering shouldn't be locked up.
Even if it was done in defense of the momfluencer, there's still a case to be made (however unlikely) that the momfluencer or her followers suffer a bout of sanity and learn a lesson intrinsically without getting the police involved for either the investigation or the subsequent charge of filing a false report.
“It’s fair to wonder whether locking up people (even briefly) who pose no danger to others is a good use of public resources.” And how exactly do we know she poses no danger to others? She already tried to get people incarcerated for kidnapping. Does Lenore have superpowers that allow here to see into the future?
Gasman beat me to it by two seconds….
Gasman? How the hell do you know he has gas?
She could have easily had these two people locked up or killed by police, had the police been their normal level of incompetence and not actually competent this time.
How many cases of people killed by police are started by an unnecessary or overwrought mistaken call to police? A large amount.
Great opportunity to branch out into the exciting field of jailbirdfluencing.
Shakespeare said it best
"Good name in man and woman, dear my lord,
Is the immediate jewel of their souls.
Who steals my purse steals trash; 'tis something, nothing;
'Twas mine, 'tis his, and has been slave to thousands;
But he that filches from me my good name
Robs me of that which not enriches him,
And makes me poor indeed."
She stole the good name of two people. That is a serious offense and a stay in jail will make her reevaluate her life choices.
So she made a shit report, it got looked into and nothing was there to see, she's not facing consequences for that. Then she sicced a virtual lunch mob on the police forcing a new investigation where the police were guilty until proven innocent, for that she deserves the punishment regardless of the target she aimed at. She's fine with destroying lives and communities just to get her way, deserves to have that energy played out on her.
Surprising! I’ve been making 100 Dollars an hour since I started freelance on the Internet six months ago. I work long hours a day from home and do the basic work that I get from the business I met online. share this work for you opportunity This is definitely the best job I have ever done.
….
Go to this link……………..>>> http://www.Richcash1.com
I thought it happened at a Goodwill, but the security guard spooked the bad guys away. Or maybe it was a Target parking lot, with one of those creepy white vans like pretty much every type of home maintenance business guy drives.
No one has to kidnap 1-4 year old kids for anything. Under Biden the Central Americans are just throwing them over the border walls, you just have to pick out the one you want. No one will miss them, no questions will be asked!
"It's fair to wonder whether locking up people (even briefly) who pose no danger to others is a good use of public resources; ..."
This was hardly a victimless crime, and it certainly wasted a lot of resources.
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.SalaryApp1.com