Alabama Schedules First Execution After Monthslong Moratorium and 'Sham' Investigation
After an array of botched and unsuccessful executions, the state's Department of Corrections says its ready to start executing inmates again.

Alabama has set its first execution since calling a moratorium on executions in November. But there is good reason to still be concerned about the state's ability to successfully carry out an execution.
Over the past year, Alabama has carried out a series of botched and unsuccessful executions. In particular, prison officials have had apparent difficulty locating inmates' veins, leading to painful procedures and hourslong delays. In two separate cases, executions were canceled altogether after prison officials were unable to begin the execution within the allotted time period.
In November, Republican Gov. Kay Ivey called for a pause in executions, pending an investigation into the state's execution procedures. However, while Ivey pressed the need for a "top-to-bottom review of the state's execution process," she also allowed the Alabama Department of Corrections (ADOC) to conduct the review of itself, rebuffing calls for an independent investigation.
The review—the results of which were not released to the public—was completed in February. According to a two-page letter directed to the governor from ADOC's commissioner, prison officials have obtained "new equipment" and rehearsed execution procedures in response to the investigation. The letter also made a vague commitment that prison officials would "add to its pool of available medical personnel for executions."
The letter notes that—at Ivey's request—the Alabama Supreme Court has changed its scheduling rules for executions. Whereas before the court would issue a single-day execution warrant that would expire at midnight, now Ivey herself is allowed to set a "time frame" for when an execution may occur. While ADOC notes this change "will make it harder for inmates to 'run out the clock' with last-minute appeals and requests for stays of execution," it also means that prison officials may be allowed to spend hours—even days—trying to place a lethal injection IV in a prisoner's arm.
"No one buys this sham of a review," Josh Moon, a reporter at the Alabama Political Reporter, wrote in February "And the reason we don't buy it is because we all have functioning brains. And those functioning brains tell us that you can't repeatedly botch executions—and botch them because you're repeatedly failing to accomplish some of the simplest tasks related to that execution—and not have way bigger issues than needing to practice more."
Despite pushback, Ivey administration officials have pressed forward. Last week, the state Supreme Court granted the attorney general's request to schedule its first execution since the start of the moratorium. James Barber, a 54-year-old who was sentenced to death for the 2001 murder of 75-year-old Dorothy Epps, is set to be executed on an unspecified date after June 2.
However, a jury didn't vote unanimously to sentence Barber to death—only 11 out of 12 jurors voted for the death penalty in his case. Currently, Alabama and Florida are the only states that allow judges to impose the death penalty without a unanimous recommendation from a jury, which is what happened in Barber's case.
Due to the lack of transparency in the state's investigation into its own execution procedures, there's little reason to think that Barber's upcoming execution will be any less tortuous than those the state has attempted to carry out in the past year.
"We're talking about ending the lives of other humans," wrote Moon in February. "If we're going to take on the monumental responsibility of holding the title of executioners…, we should guarantee that the process for carrying out that duty is above reproach and as transparent as possible. Alabama's is and has been the exact opposite on both counts."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
About time. Texas, Florida, Missouri, and Oklahoma have raced ahead of Alabama this year
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.RICHEPAY.COM
Im making over $13k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tellme how much money they can make online so I decided to look into it. Well, itwas all true and has totally changed my life.last month my pay check was $13583just working on the laptop for a few hours.Simply go to this website and followinstructions to start earning....Have a good Day..
.
.
For more detail visit the given link...................➤➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs Just open the link————————————— http://Earnwork8.blogspot.Com
https://twitter.com/nayibbukele/status/1656864400194584579?t=8MPyMlX-W7cLQU_MKD53bw&s=19
We ended on May 10, 2023, with 0 homicides nationwide.
With this, it's 365 days without homicides, a full year.
[Video]
Government always tells the truth…..
That's El Salvador's presidente
So zero refugess from ultra safe El Salvador?
They’re safer since they started locking up douchebags.
So…the government.
Lucy . you think George `s storry is impossible, on sunday I got a brand new Saab 99 Turbo after having made $8551 this past four weeks and just over ten-k last month . it's by-far the most comfortable job I have ever had . I started this five months/ago and almost straight away began to bring home over $95... per-hour..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> https://www.apprichs.com
https://twitter.com/remnantposting/status/1657115385160941569?t=yhOD5_9REDMlgtKFVHRsuA&s=19
Guys. The riots are the point. Prosecuting the innocent and releasing the guilty is the point. The anarcho-tyranny is the point.
The liberal state uses deformed freaks to terrorize normal people in order to justify its own existence.
The state has a "monopoly on violence," but the rules are never enforced as written. The state selectively sanctions & allows certain violence by certain people.
Therefore, the state uses its monopoly on violence to *commit* violence against YOU, the law-abiding subject.
If the state has a monopoly on violence, then it is categorically responsible for ALL violence that occurs in its jurisdiction.
When a criminal murders your loved one and the police and DA don't arrest the murderer, they are playing accessory to that murder.
The state is supposed to have a monopoly on the RETALIATORY use of force. We allow it to initiate force. We can fix that with a 28th amendment, “Government shall not initiate force.”
No, you fucking brain damaged cock hole, it isn't. Otherwise you'd have to wait for the cops to show up and intervene when somebody with a gun or knife was attempting to take your life. Retaliatory force is available to anyone.
I get over $25k a month working part time. I kept hearing other people tell me how much money they can make online so I decided to look it. {rea-04} Well, it was all true and has totally changed my life. This is what I do, check it out by visiting:-
.
Following Link:→ → https://workhere3.blogspot.com/
I agree, but dude, stay classy. Are hominem attacks necessary?
If you agree with that, then you're wrong too. But since you actually showed some signs of civility, I won't insult you.
No, dumbass, you clearly don't understand basic terminology. Defensive force is employed in response to an immediate threat. Retaliatory force is used to punish aggression after the fact. If a guy is coming at you with a knife and you injure or kill him to protect yourself, that's defensive force. If a guy stabs you and runs away, only to have the police forcibly subdue and arrest him later so that the state may try and punish him, that's retaliatory force. Most modern societies do grant the state a monopoly on retaliatory force because private retaliation has a long history of leading to protracted cycles of vendetta violence. The idea is that the state will act as a neutral arbiter and demonstrate that the person being punished actually deserved it. How well that works in practice may be open to debate, but that's the theory.
Just say no ! (to drugs)
Shoot 'em
Hang 'em
Behead 'em
What are you, the Taliban ?
No, they burn you alive or throw you off a building.
Edit: woops that's ISIS.
No. I oppose the masking of women, the tearing down of historical statues, the irreparable mutilation of children's genitals, and think serial rapists and people who beat innocent women (to death) should be imprisoned (or executed) rather than allowed to walk around freely.
How about you?
"In particular, prison officials have had apparent difficulty locating inmates' veins, leading to painful procedures and hourslong delays."
Hmm. I wonder about the skill level of these folks. My veins are notoriously hard to find -- but even at their worst, with a little help from ultrasound, drawing pre-surgical samples or placing in IV has never been a problem. Has ultrasound not reached Alabama?
Abolish the death penalty.
*except for the inconvenient unborn*
"Abolish the death penalty."
Yeah. I like to think of that as my preferred position. But, then I remember Bundy and John Wayne Gacy...
But then I remember all the crooked judges and prosecutors, and recall all the recent eliminationist rhetoric from the establishment "left", and I know we can never let government hold the power of life and death over people.
Some people have done such heinous things that they deserve to be ripped apart by feral pigs, but the risk of permitting government to kill is just too big.
Trust all juries involving political prosecutions, question the rest.
This government.
This is all a moot point. It's just theory. There is no rule of law anymore. There's just friend or enemy, and law is nothing more than a weapon to wield against enemies while protecting friends.
You didnt even understand a 12 person jury found defendants guilty 12-0 before going to a sentencing ruling of 8-4 in Florida.
Sorry if I dont give a shit about your legal takes.
There's two reasons for that. First, cytotoxic is incredibly stupid and unable to comprehend the subject under discussion. Second, cytotoxic is a Canadian living in the greater Toronto metro area. A fact he repeated with no shame before he took on this moniker and persona.
So when does the prosecution of Michael Byrd for summary application of the death penalty on an unarmed woman posing no threat begin, cytotoxic?
https://twitter.com/wil_da_beast630/status/1657090365814366220?t=SGoFUl8gD8-ZHFQ1WSv4Rg&s=19
Absurd level of theater here: they're perp-walking a guy who turned himself in.
[Video]
One day Alvin Bragg will be perp walked just like his victims.
Lol, pull the other one. Come on, you don't seriously believe that do you?
I am laughing my head off. Can't find a vein? Really?
How about we return to tried and true methods that use PHYSICS. Hell, in a hanging with known rope twist and strand size the executioner (or an application) with weight, height, and general bone dignity, can determine the exact length of drop to break the neck instantly and even tell you exactly how many degrees the body will rotate from the rope tension unwinding the rope.
While guillotine is messy it is extremely efficient and has not been known to fail.
Execution by firing squad with a small amount of modernization such as camera aiming and remote firing could be VERY expedient.
Then there are PILLS available. Cyanide is quick and efficient and basically fool proof. There are tens of other drugs that will kill and even inebriate the person as they do so.
Finally, the scariest one of all. Turn the perpetrator over to the victims to be dealt with 'Naked Prey' style. Not subtle, not humane, but a definite deterrent to the extreme.
It appears you only need to be near some fentanyl and catch some vapors to O.D. instantly.
Nitrogen asphyxiation. Safe, certain, and painless.
A jury convicted these people.
A judge sentenced these people to death.
Feel free to make the case that they were wrong.
Commandment 6: “Thou shalt not kill.”
Are you even a Christian? Why the assumption everyone is?
Numbers 35:16 says "strikes a person with an iron object", so copper-jacketed lead is kosher.
In the original tongue, the prohibited action is ‘retzach’ connoting a crime of bloodguilt. That is, the Jews/Israelites had many words for killing someone, retzach connotes killing as a intentional or criminal act invoking guilt.
Genesis 9:6
Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man his blood will be shed; for in His own image God has made mankind.
Exodus 21:12
Whoever strikes and kills a man must surely be put to death.
Leviticus 24:13-21
The LORD then said to Moses:
Take the blasphemer outside the camp, and when all who heard him have laid their hands on his head, let the whole community stone him.Tell the Israelites: Anyone who blasphemes God shall bear the penalty; whoever utters the name of the LORD in a curse shall be put to death. The whole community shall stone that person; alien and native-born alike must be put to death for uttering the LORD’s name in a curse. Whoever takes the life of any human being shall be put to death; whoever takes the life of an animal shall make restitution of another animal, life for a life. Anyone who inflicts a permanent injury on his or her neighbor shall receive the same in return: fracture for fracture, eye for eye, tooth for tooth. The same injury that one gives another shall be inflicted in return. Whoever kills an animal must make restitution, but whoever kills a man must be put to death.
Numbers 35:16
If, however, anyone strikes a person with an iron object and kills him, he is a murderer; the murderer must surely be put to death.
Numbers 35:30
If anyone kills a person, the murderer is to be put to death on the testimony of the witnesses. But no one is to be put to death based on the testimony of a lone witness.
Numbers 35:31
You are not to accept a ransom for the life of a murderer who deserves to die; he must surely be put to death.
The Bible had a lot of other rather literal and explicit prescriptions for who should be killed after and as a part of the issuing of the 10 Commandments, should we impose those as literally and in full force as "Thou shalt not murder/kill."?
You freely ignore the law of Moses when it comes to homosexuality and child rape, shreek, why get so hung up on your misinterpretation of the commandment not to murder?
Murder, actually. Big difference if you think about it.
More properly translated as "Thou shalt not murder". The OT God was actually pretty big on killing. I remember at least one case where He got pissed off at the Israelites for not killing enough people.
A jury let OJ walk. Fuck juries.
Jury’s are some of the dumbest motherfuckers around.
Most are just “law and order “ fanatics anyway.
I wonder why the authors of the Bill of Rights felt the right to a jury trial was importantm
They felt the right to trial by a jury OF THEIR PEERS was important. I doubt they ever envisioned "men of means" being judged by a jury of rabble.
"Jury of their peers" is nowhere in the Constitution.
You're one of those...
Nullus liber homo capiatur, vel imprisonetur, aut dissaisiatur, aut utlagetur, aut exuletur, aut aliquo modo destruatur, nec super eum ibimus, nec super eum mittemus, nisi per legale judicium parium suorum vel per legem terrae.
Because not every town has a wise scientist like Sir Bedivere to conduct a proper trial
Historically, juries were a valuable means to protect ordinary citizens from the worst abuses of state power. The problem is that modern juries have been stripped of most of their historic powers and reduced to little more than a rubber stamp. That, and the fact that barely one case in twenty ever goes before a jury.
https://twitter.com/RonDeSantisFL/status/1657212176178855939?t=Ni3cLabxMCmdNT_cETsVXw&s=19
We must defeat the Soros-Funded DAs, stop the Left's pro-criminal agenda, and take back the streets for law abiding citizens. We stand with Good Samaritans like Daniel Penny. Let’s show this Marine... America’s got his back.
[Link to Penny defense fund]
And why should we have the back of a guy who choked someone who didn't actually attack him, and kept right on choking him long after he was clearly subdued, even as his fellow passengers pointed out that he was killing the guy? I'm a staunch supporter of the right to self-defense, but everything I've heard so far suggests this went far beyond anything that could be justified as self-defense.
only 11 out of 12 jurors voted for the death penalty in his case
You say 11 out of 12 jurists voted for the death penalty but all I hear is "Passed near unanimously with bipartisan support."
The way the national media covers Alabama you'd think the whole state has no redeemable qualities. The way I hear it all the politicians should be executed.
So what's the problem executing the absolute worst 5-10 Alabamians every year?
If murdering someone is wrong, the state shouldn't get to do it either.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/begging-the-question
Why bother changing socks to post the exact same talking point a second time, shreek?
Huh? If this is some sort of inside joke amongst you regulars, you've lost me.
Best I can tell, there are only about three actual people posting here, while the rest are just pseudonyms. At least that's the impression I get from all the clowns accusing anyone they don't agree with of being a sock puppet for someone else they don't agree with. It's utterly impossible that more than one person might disagree with them. It's just socks all the way down.
So you're cool with letting them roam free? I mean imprisoning people is wrong so the State shouldn't do it either.
Weak sauce. Try again.
If I trusted the state to execute only the very worst, I might be convinced. However, any objective look at the system reveals that the factors that make some people more likely to receive a death sentence and the factors that would make them more deserving have only limited overlap. Add in the number of false convictions, and I have no confidence in the competence of the state to decide who should die.
Although I don’t trust “government” in its current state of incarnation with the responsibility for executing death penalties; and although there are certainly many, many examples of corruption, incompetence and overzealous prosecutions, pliant judges and irresponsible juries having led to unjustified convictions; nevertheless I will never support a complete and total ban on the death penalty. There are certainly cases of incorrigible career, repeat, violent criminals who deserve to be terminated with extreme prejudice to protect society. Any reasonable person could come up with a list of criteria along those lines for determining which convicts should be considered for execution; and an automatic, expeditious appeals process that would minimize the chance of abuses. But first I would recommend the total ban in every jurisdiction of the United States of America on plea bargaining, prosecutorial misconduct, guilty pleas, the insanity excuse and ladder climbing (after decriminalizing all victimless crimes, of course). Every suspect should be investigated based on factual probable cause with the supervision of non-pliant magistrates; charged only with crimes supported by factual evidence; and found guilty or not guilty on each and every charge by a jury of their peers. Any prosecutor who repeatedly over-charges or who demonstrates a tendency to coerce suspects should be disciplined up to and including dismissal from office. Any magistrate who demonstrates a tendency to issue search and arrest warrants based on flimsy police affidavits should be barred from issuing warrants. It won't be perfect, but then what part of society is?
I don't know if this is much of an angle of attack on the death penalty.
Switching to inert gas would do the trick without making a mess. I'm not sure why they haven't gone this route.
As an opponent on principle (killing is wrong if you can avoid it), and an opponent of unnecessary suffering, I would advocate for something more instantaneous and more shocking.
You could easily devise a machine that could mince a brain in under a tenth of a second, ensuring that no pain was perceived. You could even design it such that it is imperceptible to the condemned. That way you avoid the cruel lead up and anticipation of death.
Televise that, and we would either have an end to the death penalty or an end of people doing things that carry the death penalty.
“mince a brain in under a tenth of a second” “more shocking”
Large bullet to the side of the head meets both your conditions. That’s why a good fraction of people who pick their own method choose it – instantaneous but still makes a big impression.
As far as the lead up, I'm not sure it's a whole lot better to say "sometime with no warning in the next two weeks or so, your brain will explode". I'd rather enjoy my last meal knowing I could finish it.
And yet they always go for the heart, from the front in a firing squad.
12 guys with .50 cal rifles at 30 feet, half aimed at head, half at heart, from behind. Absolutely guarantee an instant exit.
And a showy exit.
Or a shaped charge with a conical copper projectile. .... absolutely disintegrate the whole head.
Do that once on TV and the debate would be over and done with.
Just hang them. It's not "cruel" unless cruelty is the intent - which it isn't. It isn't "unusual" if you make it the usual punishment.
This is of course impossible for Democrats to grasp...
The proper lethal injection is 230 grains of copper-coated lead at 835 feet/second, right between the eyes.
But I'm very dubious about allowing the government to do this just because a jury approved it. They withhold evidence from the jury and defense, they train cops to lie and use them as witnesses, they run a jury selection process that any smart person can get out of, and for death penalty trials they bias the jury by excluding anyone with doubts about the death penalty.
Even when the accused is unquestionably guilty of a vicious killing, the largest factors in whether he is sentenced to death is not the viciousness of the murder, nor the race, color, sex, or age of the murderer or victim, not whether the murderer is a mastermind or a moron, but the relative competence of the prosecutor and defense lawyers.
230 grns at 835fps? A 1911 fan I see. I'll back you up with a nice 260gt lead at 900fps from a 45LC.
Good. I object to my tax dollars being used to keep filth alive especially those that murdered others who don't have that chance. Final meal can be dirt and arsenic juice for all I care