Florida Legislature Passes Immigration Crackdown, Authorizes $12 Million for Migrant Relocation
Backed by Gov. Ron DeSantis, the measures will punish peaceful migrants and the Floridians who interact with them.

A bill cracking down on undocumented immigrants and the Floridians who interact with them is now heading to Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis' desk after passing the state House yesterday. Though some of the more contentious measures were removed from Senate Bill 1718 before passage, the bill will place punitive reporting requirements on hospitals and employers, among other things.
DeSantis announced the legislative push back in February, saying that it would "crack down on the smuggling of illegal aliens," the issuance of ID cards to undocumented immigrants, and employers hiring those in the state illegally. State Sen. Blaise Ingoglia (R–Spring Hill), who is sponsoring the bill, has said he's not "demonizing immigrants"—just illegal ones.
Around 772,000 undocumented people live in Florida, according to the Migration Policy Institute. Sixty-five percent of them have lived in the U.S. for five years or more. Given the body of research showing that immigrants—including undocumented immigrants—are less likely to commit crimes than U.S. natives, S.B. 1718 will punish a largely peaceful and long-present population.
Among the more controversial measures is a section authorizing another $12 million for the "Unauthorized Alien Transport Program," which will fund stunts like last September's migrant flights to Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts. Notably, it'll authorize transport "within the United States"—nothing saying that relocation must begin in Florida, or even involve migrants present in the state.
The bill's more mundane measures will affect far more people, however. Under S.B. 1718, private businesses with 25 or more employees will be required to use the federal E-Verify system to ensure that workers may legally work in the country. Once a business learns that an employee is unauthorized to work, it must fire him or her. Multiple violations in a 24-month period may result in the suspension of state-issued business licenses. Businesses may also lose their licenses based on the number of unauthorized people they employ: Employing between one and 10 will lead to a suspension of up to 30 days, escalating to full "revocation of all applicable licenses" for employing more than 50 unauthorized people.
As of January, DeSantis' administration had already come after businesses that failed to comply with E-Verify requirements, as Reason's Eric Boehm reported. It directed state agencies to revoke the licenses of a property management company and an online portal serving nurses—moves that would undeniably harm native-born Floridians and not just undocumented immigrants.
Another measure in S.B. 1718 will require any hospital accepting Medicaid to ask patients about their citizenship status. The bill states that this "must be followed by a statement that the response will not affect patient care or result in a report of the patient's immigration status to immigration authorities." But hospitals will also be required to submit reports to the government on the number of undocumented people they served and the costs associated with that care. The bill's language doesn't entirely eliminate privacy concerns, and on a more basic level, it may discourage undocumented people from seeking medical care entirely.
The first version of S.B. 1718 included a provision that would make it a third-degree felony for Floridians to conceal, harbor, shield, or transport "into or within" the state a person they know "or reasonably should know" is in the U.S. unlawfully. Light on specifics, many immigration advocates and Floridians who associate with undocumented immigrants in their daily lives were worried this could criminalize even the most mundane interactions. Melbourne-based pastor Joel Tooley told Reason it would criminalize "normal activities that are irrevocably natural expressions" of people's faith, which other religious leaders have said include activities like bus transport and home-based worship.
This section now only singles out people "who knowingly and willfully" transport undocumented immigrants into the state. But other implications for transportation remain. S.B. 1718 invalidates driver's licenses issued to undocumented immigrants by other states. Florida already bars undocumented immigrants from receiving driver's licenses, something critics say negatively impacts public safety.
Ahead of a likely presidential run, DeSantis has built a reputation as an immigration hardliner. In February, Politico noted that he was pushing "lawmakers to repeal state laws that offered…protections that less than a decade ago were popular with many Florida Republicans, including DeSantis' own lieutenant governor." S.B. 1718 doesn't accomplish everything DeSantis wanted, but it does bolster his image—at the expense of peaceful migrants.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
hat he was pushing "lawmakers to repeal state laws that offered…protections that less than a decade ago were popular with many Florida Republicans, including DeSantis' own lieutenant governor."
He pushed Martha's Vineyard residents to deport 50 of them.
Only after they got pizza. Don't forget that the MW residents gave them pizza. Did I mention that they got pizza?
Of course, all 50 were shunted to the mainland within 48 hours of their arrival. All 50.
By the military - - - - - - -
You know, men with GUNS!!!
A few thousand and a few million are very different things and changes everything and everyone's thinking.
Back in 2008 spending on illegal immigrants in the form of schooling, welfare, assistance was nearly 4B just for Florida.
https://www.fairus.org/sites/default/files/2017-08/fla_study.pdf?docID=601
Seems like a pretty good return on investment if they can reduce the yearly costs.
Given the body of research showing that immigrants—including undocumented immigrants—are less likely to commit crimes than U.S. natives, S.B. 1718 will punish a largely peaceful and long-present population.
Umm… why are you mixing up legal immigrants who can be deported for crimes with illegal immigrants? Is it to push a false comparison?
Nearly 3 percent of illegal immigrants in Arizona end up in state prison or jail during the course of a year four times the rate of U.S. citizens and legal residents, according to a study that uses federal reimbursements for prisons and jails to try to calculate one of the most important yet elusive statistics in the immigration debate.
https://apnews.com/article/b78a2a3c7b9d28c765ca3542e4581382
The correct comparison is the study of the population you are discussing, illegal immigrants, to the legal immigrants and citizens. And the rate is 4 times greater per a study of actual prison populations (Arizona).
DeSatan can't even successfully curbstomp a 95-year old mouse, what makes you think he's a threat to humans?
https://reason.com/2022/09/27/for-florida-gov-ron-desantis-political-stunts-are-more-important-than-substance/ and
https://reason.com/2022/09/21/are-ron-desantis-migrant-flights-legal/
Ass POTUS, DeSatan will be forcing USA taxpayers to trick and ferry billions upon brazilians of sub-Brazilians from Brazil to Botswana, and to deport illegal sub-Martians from Mars to Uranus! Ass long ass the illegal Martians SUFFER-SUFFER-SUFFER, red-meat-hungry socons and troglodytes will be DELIGHTED to spend those extra tax dollars! Butt I for one think that illegal Martians are intelligent beings, too, and hope that they will NOT suffer on Uranus, from too many foul odors, etc.!
DeSatan… SPEAKS to me! Get Thee behind me, DeSatan!
Scienfoology Song… GAWD = Government Almighty’s Wrath Delivers
DeSatan loves me, This I know,
For DeSatan tells me so,
Little ones to GAWD belong,
We are weak, but GAWD is strong!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
DeSatan loves me, yes indeed,
Makes the illegal sub-humans bleed,
Protects me for geeks and freaks,
I LOVE to pay taxes, till my wallet squeaks!
PUNISH Disney, I’ll PAY for their pains,
Ass long ass DeSatan Blesses our gains!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
DeSatan expels the low-lifes to Venus,
Moves them ANYWHERE, with His Penis!
His Penis throbs with His Righteousness,
Take no heed, He says, of His Frighteousness!
ALL must be PUNISHED, they say!
So never, EVER be or say gay!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
Our USA taxes must PAY The Way, He may say,
To EXPORT the illegal Mars aliens, every day!
To Pluto, Jupiter, or Uranus, they must ALL go!
Oh, the places that the low-lifes will go, you must know!
The taxes we shall pay? Through the money, we must BLOW!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
Yes, DeSatan loves me!
DeSatan tells me so!
(If we did NOT do-doo, doo-doo-doo, ALL of this, then that them thar illegal Mars aliens WILL show up on OUR doors, in the formerly pure USA!!! We MUST keep them AWAY, far away, out in the Deep Dark Yonder!)
#MeInTheAss’CauseI’maGullibleLowBrowBlowHardConTard
#BeenTrumpledUnderfootForFarTooLong
A 95 year old mouse with a $178 billion market cap and all of treasonous Hollywood, the treasonous media, and the treasonous democrat party behind him.
As always, conflating legal and illegal immigration to further the narrative. You guys are pathetic.
Like there is a way a legal immigrant is "undocumented".
"A bill cracking down on undocumented immigrants and the Floridians who interact with them."
Auto-check - - - -
A bill cracking down on criminals who have illegally entered the USA and the Floridians who interact with them.
One sign of a lying weasel pushing an agenda is conflating legal and illegal entry into the US.
Give them all "magic papers" and transform good into bad! Problems solved!!! Ye can thank me later!
"Papers Please, Peons!!!"
A bill cracking down on undocumented immigrants
when the law is enforced by someone yo udont like, it's referred to as "cracking down". When Obama deports a record number of illegal aliens it's called "protecting union labor"
Backed by Gov. Ron DeSantis, the measures will punish peaceful migrants and the Floridians who interact with them.
When citizens break laws, they punish us too! Why should illegal immigrants get a pass? What do you think the "illegal" in "illegal immigrant" means?
What do you think the “illegal” in “illegal witch” means?
I am sorry, but I really can't get why we worry about people who actually want to work, even if they are "undocumented." I have known more than a few natural-born Americans who I wouldn't hire to shine your shoes, much less mine.
There are costs, well documented costs, associated with government assistance to those not here. Just because they get a job, does not mean they are in fact without a cost.
You’re isolating one part of the discussion to ignore the rest that goes against it.
In a world of no welfare or government sustenance, no problem with it. But that's not the world we have.
'You’re isolating one part of the discussion to ignore the rest that goes against it."
They also bring benefits, which you choose to ignore.
Indeed.
https://news.yahoo.com/texas-gov-greg-abbott-slammed-211032957.html?fr=yhssrp_catchall
No i don't. Costs far exceed benefits. That's why it is a cost and not a benefit.
DeSatan, tis of Thee,
The Great One, who reigns supreme,
With His mighty hand,
He rules across the land,
His power we cannot flee!
DeSatan, tis of Thee I laud,
For punishing the "woke" fraud,
He silences their cries,
And exposes all their lies,
His wrath they cannot defraud.
DeSatan, tis of Thee I sing,
His justice makes the heavens ring,
With His righteous might,
He vanquishes the night,
To His glory we all shall cling.
DeSatan, tis of Thee I adore,
For sending the aliens offshore,
To Uranus they will go,
And there they shall know,
That DeSatan's power reigns forevermore.
DeSatan, tis of Thee we'll pay,
Our taxes for His righteous way,
To export the "low-lifes",
To far-off planets and strife,
DeSatanism shall never sway!
#MeInTheAss’CauseI’maGullibleLowBrowBlowHardConTard
#BeenTrumpledUnderfootForFarTooLong
Their work ethic is great, and I welcome them to complete the standard process and I will then welcome them as an American citizen.
Just as I would be expected to do in ANY COUNTRY I wanted to live. And just because my work ethic is better than 99% of the people in those countries, I dont have the entitled attitude that it means I get to cross their border and break their laws because im better than the shittier of their citizens.
Has anyone done a study on how many illegal immigrants come here to work? Or how many of those that want to work don’t end up getting paid well below market (or at least minimum) wages?
Cause in my mind, it’s kind of fucked up under the current system to turn a blind eye as we let them in so they can be a permanent underclass. At least until their American born kids join the ranks of “lazy native kids who don’t want to do any kind of hard work” and start sucking the welfare teat.
"Cause in my mind, it’s kind of fucked up under the current system to turn a blind eye as we let them in so they can be a permanent underclass."
Feature? Bug....?
Because the dignity of work has been displaced by an influx of I’m here for what I heard I could get and not what I could get from what I could earn.
The resources are not there. Eventually we all have to buy the mower we are borrowing from our neighbor, not ask them to buy a better one so we don’t have to work as hard to mow the lawn.
So citizenship means nothing to you?
Ive heard from all of the media that Desantis is a weak cuck who was embarrassed by Disney, so there is no way he could have done this. Must have been some other gov.
Or, perhaps, the media is lying?
A bunch of far left corporate propagandists publishing lies? I can’t imagine such a thjng.
Shame on Reason for taking a "libertarian" point of view on immigration, that people should for the most part be free from coercion, and then criticize the Republican for coercive policies.
If they were true libertarians they’d take a conservative point of view, that civilization is under constant threat from within and without, and then praise the Republican for protecting us from the outside threat.
True libertarians are conservative Republicans.
Does illegal immigration have a cost, yes or no?
Importing a subclass of workers at the cost of taxpayers is not a libertarian view. It is an ignorant view.
I'm glad she acknowledged the monstrous premise of this otherwise good comedy. A couple breaks up, so they decide to divide up their infant twins -- so each girl will never see the other parent, her sister, or any of her other relatives again? Or even know she has a sister? Just as in the original version of this movie, the real villains a re clearly both parents.....
SITE. ——>>> WORK AT HOME
But giving DHS more power is? Lmfao.
They should have no power over asylum aside from enforcing the law as it stands and agreed to by the citizens and their representatives.
Define more power.
Not in Maine
Does illegal immigration have a cost, yes or no?
Lowest crime rate but....
Least diverse state in the union.
ESG hardest hit.
Illegal immigration actually bankrupted Maines emergency shelter budget. Maine was complaining how their emergency resources are at zero.
Perhaps Sarc should be forced to share his refrigerator box with some
gay tranny minority.
Just talk to the people of Cleveland, Tx. Francisco Oropesa had been deported four times, then he decided to go on a rampage.
How's those open borders working out for ya?
Pretending that national borders don’t exist and that governments don’t have the authority or power to enforce those borders isn’t libertarian either.
I don't think anyone wants no border enforcement at all. That's a pathetic strawman I expect from the people I don't respond to.
The article is about government coercion being applied to people who interact with those without papers. Conservatives will defend that, but libertarians won't.
No government can be simultaneously representative and incognizant of it's citizenry.
It's one or the other.
If you don’t think anyone wants no border enforcement, you haven’t seen some of the arguments that Fiona, or even other posters, have made.
In context of this particular article, I suppose you’re right about my response being fallacious.
Sarc is the master at gaslighting.
But he’s a total pussy when it comes to backing up his threats.
The people of Cleveland, Tx. might have a few things to say.
Don’t you ever get tired of lying sarc?
No, he doesn’t. Or being a huge grimy pussy when he doesn’t back up his drunken threats of violence against members of the commentariat.
No one says that. Maine person being overrun with illegal aliens you are supporting with your tax base.
but I worked with some H1 folks in the 90's that were really cool. Some were from Jamaica.
Ha
Deep Thought here. Still fleshing it out.
Conservatives see a world full of threats, and respond accordingly.
Progressives see oppressors and oppressed, and respond accordingly.
Libertarians despise coercion, which mean the other guys don't care because they find it to be a useful tool.
To be fair to both: the world IS full of threats and there are legitimate oppressors.
Not to get too esoterical, but i don’t know if I would argue that coercion always violated the NAP. At least in the sense of it being employed as a response to aggression (real or perceived). So I would possibly modify your last sentence to be “Libertarians despise unjustified aggression.”
Conservatives don't see a world full of threats. That is the liberal assessment and they, unfortunately are the ones who respond accordingly.
I, leaning conservative, do not want someone else to asses my risk for me. I have done that on my own throughout my life. Oppression, to me, feels like some one wanting to press, and i mean pressss, their own fears onto me as to make me accept their level of fear as the basis for what my fear should look like.
Well yes, I fear that YOUR fear does NOT meet my standards!!! So I fear that you MUST amp up your fear, OR ELSE!!!
(Evil people run on fear; their power depends on it! To defang them, we need to NOT fear them, come hell or high water!)
My assessment is that the democrat party has become predominantly neo Marxist, and is an existential threat to the republic, and our constitution.
Does anyone disagree with that? At least outside of our usual leftist troll trash?
"the bill will place punitive reporting requirements on hospitals and employers, among other things."
So... Government coercing Business to act in the interests of the State.
It's obviously fascism when Democrats do it, but what do we call the same play from Team Red? How about "modeling responsible citizenship"?
Quit sockpuppeting , Shrike.
Please don’t use the words “sock” and “shrike” together.
The erroneous TNC rate for E-Verify in FY 2009 was 0.3 percent and has been declining over time. The erroneous TNC rate declined from 0.7 to 0.3 between April through June 2005 and April through June 2010.
The overall accuracy of E-Verify for employment-authorized workers, as measured by the FNC accuracy rate, was approximately 94 percent. It is estimated that 94 percent of FNCs were accurately issued to unauthorized workers and 6 percent were inaccurately issued to employment-authorized workers.
– From U.S. Department of Homeland Security, EVALUATION OF THE ACCURACY OF E-VERIFY FINDINGS
Guess those legally eligible to work people, but due to government errors can just can go on welfare instead of being productive members of society. But at least we know DHS, won’t weaponize this against disfavored groups; certainly they wouldn’t say put some parent through hell just because they criticize a school board member.
I'm glad she acknowledged the monstrous premise of this otherwise good comedy. A couple breaks up, so they decide to divide up their infant twins -- so each girl will never see the other parent, her sister, or any of her other relatives again? Or even know she has a sister? Just as in the original version of this movie, the real villains a re clearly both parents.....
SITE. ——>>> WORK AT HOME
No bad - could be stronger. I just hope it's not one of those you are hereby sentenced to death type laws and 45 years later, the criminal is still alive and kicking i.e. Illegals will never work in Florida, and then you end up attending their retirement party with 100 illegals, when they turn 70.
Hey Fiona, you gonna talk about the cultural enrichment an undocumented immigrant brought to Texas last week?
He certainly enriched the lead content of the family next door.
Which makes it so weird that it isn't getting talked about, I can only wonder why.
But it will be anonymously incorporated into the statistics of "mass shootings".
You’ll hear about it from Reason right after they publish that big story about J6 detainees.
All the commentary I've seen is "This is Why America Needs More Gun Control".
A version of this quote appears in almost EVERY article on this topic at reason, "that immigrants—including undocumented immigrants—are less likely to commit crimes than U.S. natives, S.B. 1718 will punish a largely peaceful and long-present population"
This is at best misleading and more likely intellectually dishonest.
The topic is not "immigrants" as you stated, but illegal immigrants, meaning your statistic is utterly meaningless. On top of that, many states do not even collect information on "immigration status" so you'd never even know the real metric. Finally, even if it were true that illegal immigrants commit fewer crimes, how would that even be relevant? Crime rate is not the only factor in whether the US should admit someone or not. It's more like a bare minimum.
It also ignores the fact that immigrants have been here for less of their lives than born citizens. If you compare the number of crimes committed over a lifetime by a native to the number committed by a foreigner who has been here for only a short time, obviously the number committed by the immigrant will be shorter even if their lifetime number is equal.
"Given the body of research showing that immigrants—including [illegally present] immigrants—are less likely to commit crimes [as long as you ignore fraud and being here in the first place]..." Fixed the quote for accuracy. Undocumented is a weasel word, because most of them are documented, fraudulently. I may dislike the governements efforts to control the economy and collect taxes, but that doesn't make using a fake SSN a non-crime.
Control of territory is a defining characteristic of government. Open borders is an anarchist position, not a libertarian one.
"Among the more controversial measures is a section authorizing another $12 million for the "Unauthorized Alien Transport Program," which will fund stunts like last September's migrant flights to Martha's Vineyard, Massachusetts."
Awesome!! I love it when sanctuary jurisdictions are matched with the migrants they are desperate to attract. This is such a fell good story. DeSantis should achieve saint-hood for this altruistic act. I sure hope the pope is watching.
>>But hospitals will also be required to submit reports to the government on the number of undocumented people they served and the costs associated with that care.
so gov can triple the numbers and seek increased funding.
Invading another country and living there as a fugitive is not peaceful.
As soon as I saw "peaceful migrants", I knew I was being conned.
At this point, you can assume that as soon as you see the reason logo.
There was a very peaceful migrant in Texas last week. Strangely, Reason isn't talking about it.
How odd.
Reason's hiring is horrible. Fiona, Emma..like a DIE HR consultant said to hire woman and "minorities" who represent "diversity" (bolshie views but don't look like NIck or Matt).
So the overweight single mom with eight kids from Guatamala is paying more in taxes than she gets in Federal and State aid? Really? Wow...I'm all in..open the borders.
LMAO.... "punish peaceful migrants"????
So... It's okay to invade and break laws as long as it's done peacefully?
Hey man; I just peaceful walked into your house, drove your car, ate your lunch ...... Hey man; I did it peacefully... WTF! /s
Yeah the libs on the west coast also peacefully rioted, burned, looted, and murdered. That illegal in Texas peacefully murdered his illegal neighbors.
The thing is either you believe in the rule of law or you believe in chaos. It seems Fiona doesn't believe in the rule of law (unless ignoring it hurts her personally) but believes in chaos.
Fiona, are we a nation of laws or not?
Funny how there are some who gripe endlessly about every *Constitutional* authority granted (i.e. National-Defense against invasion) and ironically they are usually the same one's who gripe endlessly about NOT having UN-Constitutional grants of authority...
And that is how one determines the difference between a USA Patriot and an 'enemy' of the USA.
Excellent. Martha’s Vineyard could use a few thousand more illeg I mean undocumented guest workers to make their beds, mow the lawns, take out the trash. Don’t forget Rehoboth Beach. I’m sure the Bidens would welcome a couple thousand more there, especially Hunter, if there were some nice young girls. There’s N.Y. City which claims to be a sanctuary, so they could stand another twenty or thirty thousand more. Don’t forget Chicago, the new mayor would be pleased to welcome ten or fifteen thousand more “guest workers”. There’s Minneapolis, Kenosha, St. Louis , Philadelphia, Detroit, plenty of sanctuary cities eagerly welcoming the poor, the hungry, the yearning to be free. Just ask the people of Cleveland, Tx.
Should send MV a hundred thousand illegals. If they don’t like it, tough shit.
MV is about 70% land mass of the Gaza strip which houses 3M in a penal colony. Using Gaza as a basis...2M wonderful, brave and stunning immigrants can move there. In fact, let's open MV to Palestinians from Gaza..I would love to see the NYC billionaires who live on the island welcome them with Palestinian flags and parades...ha ha ha
Hey Reason, remember this guy?
https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/05/05/joe-biden-and-the-chaos-of-virtue-signalling/
Have you noticed that when Donald Trump does something, it’s ‘fascism’, yet when Joe Biden does the same thing, it’s ‘politics’?
Consider troop deployments to the US-Mexico border. In October 2018, President Trump caused hair-tearing angst among liberals across Christendom when he sent 5,000 troops to the border to deal with what he called an ‘invasion’ of illegal immigrants.
What a ‘virulent melange of nationalism and authoritarianism’, thundered the New Republic. It even whispered the f-word. In sending soldiers south, it said, Trump was making his ‘closing argument to voters’ ahead of the midterm elections the following month, and that closing argument was: ‘fascism’. Esquire was equally irate. It is the ‘hallmark of authoritarian regimes’ to march troops around in such a cynical, political fashion, it argued.
Fast forward five years and now it’s President Biden doing ‘fascism’. He is sending 1,500 troops to bolster resources at the southern border ahead of an ‘expected surge’ of migrants. They’ll join the 2,500 National Guard members who are already there assisting border agents. That adds up to 4,000 heavily armed men and women, just a thousand shy of Trump’s virulent, nationalistic strongman show five years ago.
And yet the media discussion this time round could not be more different. You’ll search fruitlessly for pained denunciations of Biden as a fascist. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has not flown down to blub for the cameras. Yes, there is criticism of Biden’s ‘militarisation of the border’, but it is free of the historically illiterate hysteria that accompanied the liberal rage against Trump’s troop deployment. One Democratic senator, Bob Menendez of New Jersey, is reported to have ‘ripped’ Biden for his border plan. Ripped? What did he say? Brace yourselves: he called it ‘unacceptable’.
There you have it. The same policy can either be a vile act of semi-fascistic authoritarianism or just unacceptable, depending entirely on who’s enacting it. Once again we see the staggering double standards of the liberal elites’ performative anti-Trumpism. Trump acts tough, it’s the 1930s again. Biden acts tough, it’s okay, he means well.
Performative anti-Trumpism is not only an irritating part of the media chatter about America’s border crisis. In many ways it is responsible for the border crisis right now. Pretty much Biden’s only selling point to the electorate in 2020 was that he was Not Trump. He was the yin to Trump’s yang, the virtue to Trump’s vice. And one of the issues on which he was most keen to display his Not Trumpism was the border.
To signal his virtue – to the liberal media, to the graduate elites who make up the Dems’ core base – Biden dismantled many of Trump’s border measures. And the result has been as depressing as it was predictable: not a more liberal, sensible border policy, but disarray. Rarely have the destabilising consequences of elevating theatrical displays of virtue over rational policymaking been so clearly exposed.
Biden’s posting of 1,500 more troops to the southern border is itself a desperate effort to manage the fallout from his own anti-Trumpism. The Biden set agitated against Title 42, a Trumpite policy that allowed the government swiftly to expel undocumented migrants. This was a Covid-era policy, introduced in early 2020, justified to prevent the spread of coronavirus in the US. Thanks to Biden, it is due to expire on 11 May and the authorities are expecting a ‘new surge of migrants’. Hence the extra military manpower.
Everyone knows that the removal of Title 42 will lead to an influx of migrants that America is not prepared for. State leaders are in a state of panic. ‘Title 42 is the one thing standing between us and utter chaos’, says the Republican senator for Utah, Mike Lee. From the other side of the aisle, the Dem mayor of New York City, Eric Adams, says he is in ‘urgent need [of] help’ to deal with the thousands of new migrants NYC should expect post-Title 42. Adams is perplexed that, ‘with the expiration of Title 42 just days away’, the federal government still hasn’t ‘shared [its] plans’ for how it will accommodate new arrivals.
Have you noticed that when Donald Trump does something, it’s ‘fascism’, yet when Joe Biden does the same thing, it’s ‘politics’?
Consider troop deployments to the US-Mexico border. In October 2018, President Trump caused hair-tearing angst among liberals across Christendom when he sent 5,000 troops to the border to deal with what he called an ‘invasion’ of illegal immigrants.
What a ‘virulent melange of nationalism and authoritarianism’, thundered the New Republic. It even whispered the f-word. In sending soldiers south, it said, Trump was making his ‘closing argument to voters’ ahead of the midterm elections the following month, and that closing argument was: ‘fascism’. Esquire was equally irate. It is the ‘hallmark of authoritarian regimes’ to march troops around in such a cynical, political fashion, it argued.
Fast forward five years and now it’s President Biden doing ‘fascism’. He is sending 1,500 troops to bolster resources at the southern border ahead of an ‘expected surge’ of migrants. They’ll join the 2,500 National Guard members who are already there assisting border agents. That adds up to 4,000 heavily armed men and women, just a thousand shy of Trump’s virulent, nationalistic strongman show five years ago.
And yet the media discussion this time round could not be more different. You’ll search fruitlessly for pained denunciations of Biden as a fascist. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has not flown down to blub for the cameras. Yes, there is criticism of Biden’s ‘militarisation of the border’, but it is free of the historically illiterate hysteria that accompanied the liberal rage against Trump’s troop deployment. One Democratic senator, Bob Menendez of New Jersey, is reported to have ‘ripped’ Biden for his border plan. Ripped? What did he say? Brace yourselves: he called it ‘unacceptable’.
There you have it. The same policy can either be a vile act of semi-fascistic authoritarianism or just unacceptable, depending entirely on who’s enacting it. Once again we see the staggering double standards of the liberal elites’ performative anti-Trumpism. Trump acts tough, it’s the 1930s again. Biden acts tough, it’s okay, he means well.
Performative anti-Trumpism is not only an irritating part of the media chatter about America’s border crisis. In many ways it is responsible for the border crisis right now. Pretty much Biden’s only selling point to the electorate in 2020 was that he was Not Trump. He was the yin to Trump’s yang, the virtue to Trump’s vice. And one of the issues on which he was most keen to display his Not Trumpism was the border.
To signal his virtue – to the liberal media, to the graduate elites who make up the Dems’ core base – Biden dismantled many of Trump’s border measures. And the result has been as depressing as it was predictable: not a more liberal, sensible border policy, but disarray. Rarely have the destabilising consequences of elevating theatrical displays of virtue over rational policymaking been so clearly exposed.
Biden’s posting of 1,500 more troops to the southern border is itself a desperate effort to manage the fallout from his own anti-Trumpism. The Biden set agitated against Title 42, a Trumpite policy that allowed the government swiftly to expel undocumented migrants. This was a Covid-era policy, introduced in early 2020, justified to prevent the spread of coronavirus in the US. Thanks to Biden, it is due to expire on 11 May and the authorities are expecting a ‘new surge of migrants’. Hence the extra military manpower.
Everyone knows that the removal of Title 42 will lead to an influx of migrants that America is not prepared for. State leaders are in a state of panic. ‘Title 42 is the one thing standing between us and utter chaos’, says the Republican senator for Utah, Mike Lee. From the other side of the aisle, the Dem mayor of New York City, Eric Adams, says he is in ‘urgent need [of] help’ to deal with the thousands of new migrants NYC should expect post-Title 42. Adams is perplexed that, ‘with the expiration of Title 42 just days away’, the federal government still hasn’t ‘shared [its] plans’ for how it will accommodate new arrivals.
You don’t have to buy into the febrile talk of ‘utter chaos’ to recognise that it is strange, and unsustainable, for the Biden administration to further dismantle border controls without making plans for eventualities. Clearly, advertising his virtue matters more to Biden than such trifling matters as border security and working out what to do with incoming migrants. The military might he’s sending down south is essentially a corrective to his own breastbeating anti-Trumpism.
This has been the case time and again in Biden’s approach to the border. He virtuously dismantles Trump’s ‘evil’ border measures and he’s then forced to introduce border measures of his own to soften the consequences of his own performative virtue. Even in relation to Title 42, Biden has alternatively postured against it and expanded it. ‘I don’t like Title 42’, he said in January, winning the love of the right-on he so tragically covets. And yet his administration also renewed Title 42, perhaps recognising that correct-think is all well and good but it doesn’t police borders. As CNN put it, Biden ‘publicly decries Title 42’ while ‘repeatedly turn[ing] to the Trump-era policy as a tool to manage a spiralling situation at the border’.
It’s the same with ‘The Wall’. During the presidential campaign, Biden said he would build ‘not another foot’ of the wall between Mexico and the US. He is Not Trump, you see. On his first day in office, he halted the wall’s construction. Cue chattering-class praise. And yet he quietly reversed course. As The Economist put it, his sudden discontinuation of the wall left ‘glaring gaps’ along the border, and eventually Biden agreed to fill them in. Virtue crashed against reality yet again.
Then there was Trump’s ‘Remain in Mexico’ policy. This forced aspiring migrants to await the outcome of their applications south of the border rather than in the US itself. Biden reversed this, too. But later, he reversed his own reversal and reintroduced ‘Remain in Mexico’. Why? Because his administration ‘failed to enact any necessary accompanying measures or preparation to ensure the reversal would be successful’, in the words of the Daily Beast, hardly Trump lovers. The Daily Beast nailed it: ‘Political virtue-signalling becomes self-defeating when accompanied by governmental incompetence.’
So Biden bashes Trump’s wall, then builds more of it. He laments Title 42, then enforces it. He reverses ‘Remain in Mexico’, then reinstates it. The end result is neither a more sane immigration policy nor a stricter immigration policy, but no policy at all. Just a yawning vacuum of leadership. Posturing where there should be policymaking. Virtuous preening where there should be political clarity. A nation whose leader is more concerned with exhibiting his own moral rectitude than with securing the national territory will soon discover what instability means.
The current border crisis tells us a larger story, then. It confirms America is governed by an elite so bereft of principles and ideas that it cannot say what it is for, only what it is against. We are Not Trump, we hate The Wall, we loathe you deplorables, this narcissistic establishment cries, with not a second thought for the chaotic impact their performative virtue is having on everyday life.
Brendan O’Neill is spiked’s chief political writer and host of the spiked podcast, The Brendan O’Neill Show.
That's what a libertarian border article looks like.
First any company found employing an illegal is fined $100K per illegal employee. Use the money to defend the border. Work visas can only be given if an three Americans turn down the job at the market rate. Problem solved.
Online, Google paid $45 per hour. Nine months have passed since my close relative last had a job, but in the previous month she earned $10500 by working 8 hours a day from home. Now is the time for everyone to try this job by using this website…
Click the link—↠ http://Www.Smartjob1.com
I think busing the illegal immigrants to sanctuary cities is an excellent use of my tax dollars.
Ron DeSantis is going to be an excellent president
Indeed. Plenty to go around. next stop Martha's Vineyard, Rehoboth Beach and N.Y. City. Send some to Chicago too.