Don't Freak Out Over Teens Having Fast Food Jobs
"I think it's really good for a lot of young people, no matter if they need a job or not, to work," says one college student who got her first job at 16.

Teenagers are less and less likely to meet once-important milestones of independence. Young people are now less likely to have a driver's license, less likely to be sexually active, and less likely to have a job than their parents were. However, some states are enacting reforms that might help with one of these trends. In the face of a severe labor shortage, several states are liberalizing child labor laws, making it easier for teenagers to enter the work force.
But while the recent attempts to liberalize child labor law have been minimal at best, it hasn't kept critics from framing the reforms as inherently exploitative and dangerous—an approach that ignores the numerous benefits to employment among teenagers and the scores of teens who desperately want the responsibility and financial independence a job can bring.
Over the past year, several states have proposed reforms to their child labor laws in an attempt to ease labor shortages. Last year, New Jersey enacted a bill allowing teenagers 16 and older to work up to 50 hours a week during summer break with parental approval. In Ohio, the Legislature is considering a similar proposal, allowing 14- and 15-year-olds to work later hours as long as their parents consent. Last month, Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders ignited particular criticism when she signed a bill that removed the state's requirement that 14- and 15-year-olds obtain government permits to work.
Even though Sanders pointed out that the new law brought Arkansas in line with several other states, including Arizona, Colorado, and Texas, critics framed the law as both extreme and likely to lead to increased child abuse. In particular, as Reason's J.D. Tuccille notes, critics cite "the dangers of illegal child labor involving migrant children, critics immediately attacked the idea of eased legal employment."
Terri Gerstein, a Harvard labor researcher, asked in The New York Times, "when child labor violations come to light, especially horrifying ones, shouldn't elected officials strengthen laws and fund enforcement rather than allow more children to be exploited?"
On Monday, a TikTok video went viral on Twitter, apparently showing a 13-year-old working at Chick-fil-A. Notably, the video doesn't appear to show any child labor violations. The teenager says that his father owns the store, and children are generally legally allowed to work at businesses owned by their parents. While most of the replies to the video were positive, the pro-union nonprofit that posted it insisted on framing a teenager working for his parents as a bad thing: "The National Restaurant Association—a lobby group funded by big food corporations—is a key driver behind new bills letting kids work dangerous jobs."
Yep, taking drive-thru orders and slinging waffle fries sounds like the definition of danger.
But by portraying teenage workers as being helplessly exploited, critics miss both the economic benefits of working as a teenager, as well as the pride most teenagers feel about their after-school or summer jobs.
"I just wanted to start not sitting around all summer, and I wanted to have my own money that I didn't have to ask my parents for to pay for things I wanted," says my stepsister Virginia Buchanan, a sophomore at Auburn University. Buchanan got her first job at 16 working at a local Chick-fil-A. Our brother joined her soon after—he got his first job scooping ice cream as a high school freshman.
"I think it's really good for a lot of young people, no matter if they need a job or not, to work," Buchanan told me, adding that the experience taught her practical skills, like "how to work with people, maybe people you don't necessarily like, but learning how to get along with them enough to get the job done."
But my younger siblings aren't the only ones who see the clear benefits of getting jobs as teenagers. Empirical evidence shows that the benefits of being employed as a teen last for years after landing the first job. One 2014 study looking at the long-term impacts of teenage employment found that "for a young adult in high school at the turn of the millennium, 20 hours per week of part-time work in their senior year resulted in annual earnings that were 20 percent higher 6-9 years after graduation, as compared to their fellow students who didn't work."
The lifetime benefits of working as a teenager make sense when considering the responsibility and practical skills it teaches young people. "In a job, teens are forced to discover or build out parts of themselves that are not required for school, home or sports," psychologist Lisa Damour told The Washington Post last year. "Teens will meet the moment, but if it's the same moment over and over, there's no need to grow."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This is rare, an Emma article that actually is pretty good. There’s no reason teens shouldn’t be working like this. Hell, I had my first job at 16. Taught me that I didn’t want to work in a concession stand ever again.
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com
I'm just curious who she thinks is freaking out over teens having fast food jobs. Who *else* should have them? Certainly not competent adults.
It used to be mildly shocking when there weren't any teens in a fast food joint. Most around here are staffed by adult Mexicans these days.
Easily start receiving more than $600 every single day from home in your part time. i made $18781 from this job in my spare time afte my college. easy to do job and its regular income are awesome. no skills needed to do this job all you need to know is how to copy and paste stuff online. join this today by follow details on this page.
.
.
Apply Now here►————————————————➤ https://Www.Coins71.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outlit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK 🙂
HERE====)> GOOGLE WORK
Which is how we end up with $15+ minimum wage laws, because people think a part-time job flipping burgers is supposed to allow you to feed a family of four (or more), instead of being an entry level, no-skill job that can be easily filled by an entry-level, no-skill teenager. How long until we see the same immigrants protesting about the teenagers taking their jobs?
I couldn't agree more.
yes,and they invariably screw up the order.
yes,and they invariably screw up the order
Presumably this is a reference to people hyperventilating about "child labor".
I started at 15 and had to get a Permit but making honest money felt very liberating,bagging groceries taught me a lot.
You could make even more HONEST MONEY ONLINE at google.scamrichquick.com.
I've already made over $7294010 from that website.
Why would I freak out? I lied about my age to get a paper route at 11, you had to be 12. I started my own lawn and gardening business at 13. By 14 I was working for cash in a gas station and by 15 was working in a grocery store paying taxes and social security. Of course kids could never do that today, they have to get a government issued work permit. So why would I freak out? Learning to work hard for your money while young is good for you. Having to pay taxes is eye opening for you. I also participated in school sports and made the honor roll. That all served me well in life.
"New Jersey started letting 16 years olds work!"
"Well, how else are they going to afford gas money? I got my license at 14..."
"We don't let them drive in NJ until 18."
"I don't think you understand what the real problem is..."
Of course kids could never do that today,
Because I can see it in my Social Security records, I know that I started working in 1989 at 12 as a summer job while school was out. This was in our small family retail business where I was managed by a non-family member, and I remember that I was paid the princely minimum wage of the time of $3.35/hour. I didn't realize it at the time, but that helped me develop a lot of skills that became more useful as I developed into career-based roles, and those missing that experience will have a harder time when they try to get started with any employment. That's likely where the entitled attitude surfaces, whereas prior experience shows the value of work and growth to earn your reputation.
Too young to work --- but just the right age to neuter themselves permanently to pursue their identity.
Except that they cannot do so because no surgeon in the US will do gender-affirming genital surgery on a minor.
Except that they do.
Stop being a liar.
Not gender affirming. Your gender was affirmed at birth.
They're called sex changes.
I'm not endorsing the terminology. Would you be happier if I put "gender-affirming" in scare quotes?
Talk about progressives trying to control what language people use --there's been a lot of that going on around here lately.
Mike Laursen 3 hours ago
Except that they cannot do so because no surgeon in the US will do gender-affirming genital surgery on a minor.
Mike knows the following, but is deliberately lying about it in hopes that some other naïve reader doesn’t.
2017-2021 American kids ages 6-17 on puberty blockers as treatment for gender dysphoria: 4,780
2017-2021 American kids ages 6-17 on hormone therapy as treatment for gender dysphoria: 14,726
2017-2021 American kids ages 13-17 receiving mastectomies as treatment for gender dysphoria: 776
The Komodo analysis of insurance claims found 56 genital surgeries among patients ages 13 to 17 with a prior gender dysphoria diagnosis from 2019 to 2021.
Citation: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-transyouth-data/
“For the analysis of pediatric patients initiating puberty blockers or hormones, Komodo searched for patients with a prior gender dysphoria diagnosis. Patients with a diagnosis of central precocious puberty were removed. A total of 17,683 patients, ages 6 through 17, with a prior gender dysphoria diagnosis initiated either puberty blockers or hormones or both during the five-year period. Of these, 4,780 patients had initiated puberty blockers and 14,726 patients had initiated hormone treatment.”
And because Mike will now try to downplay 56 castrations and neovaginas, a little reminder of what’s involved:
Gender clinics will castrate a boy and turn his penis inside out to create a neovagina — a wound that requires dilation for his entire life. If the boy is on puberty blockers, there isn’t enough penile tissue for the surgery. In this case, they cut out some of his colon or stomach lining to form the interior.
Never forget that Mike is a psychopath.
Keep it up, ML.
Mike's MO is to pretend that he has you muted. The longer he can post stuff without having to respond to your counter-arguments, the more chaos he can create. Eventually he will decide that you have honed your replies well enough that they need to be responded to (especially when you consistently reply, thwarting his volume game). At that point he will spend a week or two insisting that your data is lies, demanding cites while never providing any of his own. When you do provide cites, he will call that creepy and fascist. Only then will you have won.
There was a term for it used for decades...until advocates decided it sounded bad. Now, in a thoroughly artificial way, they demand we all change our language to what they desire.
You seem irked that I will not use your preferred terminology.
that is correct, gender is in the brain and a mental illness. Sex is your body, and it is a mutilation of how you were born.
If that were true, it would NEVER OCCUR to you to say so.
OMG! Working in the USA for what one wants has to be cruel and unusual punishment or something... /s 🙂
Home income solution to enable everyone to work online and receive weekly payments to bank acct. Earn over $500 every day and get payouts every week straight to account bank. My last month of income was $30,390 and all I do is work up to 4 hours a day on my computer. Easy work and steady income are great with this job.
More information……………….>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
I’m guessing this is for the commies who read reason.
Just the editorial staff.
yeah, the commies
No one is freaking out over teenagers having fast food jobs. The only people freaking out are the people responsible for the state of Teenagers not having jobs, sex or fun.
"Teenagers shouldn't have jobs unless it's in a cross-dressing strip club. Or as whores."
There are a few pinko Karens freaking out.
But it’s CHILD LABOUR!!!1!! ???? HOW TERRIBLE!!!1!!
Edit: It seems emojis don't work on Reason.
"the pro-union nonprofit "
These are the people freaking out about teens having jobs.
In almost every State minors cannot enter into binding contracts. This includes UNION contracts.
" among teenagers and the scores of teens who desperately want the responsibility and financial independence a job can bring."
Probably filthy Christians. These laws will work to allow us to identify and socially intervene to fix these anti-social and anti-Black characteristics.
"I just wanted to start not sitting around all summer, and I wanted to have my own money that I didn't have to ask my parents for to pay for things I wanted," says my stepsister Virginia Buchanan
See? She will not be conditioned to sit around and ask government to pay for things she wants.
Utterly vile upbringing.
Maybe some public school brainwashing and indoctrination plus a sex change operation can correct her deficiencies? Make her/him WANT a government check.
"resulted in annual earnings that were 20 percent higher 6-9 years after graduation, as compared to their fellow students who didn't work."
Hence why we must institute a UBI - equity, fairness, should be our guidance. Those who can should be providing for those who choose not.
A UBI of about $100 per month per citizen would cost $360 billion per year assuming the US has 300 million citizens, which is better than existing welfare programs.
The hard part will be convincing leftists to get rid of existing social welfare programs. But I'm sure many would be willing to do so if it was clear that a UBI in addition to all the existing programs was politically unfeasible.
I get $100 a month too, right? No means-testing, just $100 for everybody? Right? Right?
If it's structured like the FairTax pre-bate, then yes. But do you really think these politicians want to have everyone get the same? They want to be able to pander to their favored groups (and R & D both have their own favored groups), and give them special privileges.
is the "Don't Freak Out" part because you freak out at the notion or is it tongue-in-cheek?
Did you RTFA? It gives examples of people who freaked out about it.
examples of people is not the author's opinion.
Don't Freak Out Over Teens Having Fast Food Jobs
Hell no. If you're not running a nuclear reactor by age 16 you'll never make anything of yourself.
My first job at 14 was with a McDonald's.
It taught me nothing, but I picked up smoking in the crew room. Took me 20 years to lick that habit.
That $4.15/hr was pretty sweet, though. And I really mean that. Bought a Sega Genesis and then a dirt bike.
"...Last month, Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders ignited particular criticism when she signed a bill that removed the state's requirement that 14- and 15-year-olds obtain government permits to work..."
Never once had to ask the government for permission to make money.
Never had a driving job, then?
"Never had a driving job, then?"
Takes tiny hands to grasp at straws that thin.
My oldest has been a lifeguard for the last year or so. The one risk I've noticed is that it pays too much. All these kids have to do is show up and be reasonably competent, and they stand out head and shoulders above the rest of the kids. Within 6 months she was making like $19 an hour. To a 16 year old who doesn't have to pay room or board or anything, that's an absurd amount of money.
Some nephews and nieces were seduced by this pay into not going to college. That's fine and all, but now they are finding out 5 or 6 years later that there is a cap to how much you can get in some of these companies without a college education (just competing with kids who went into college out of HS). And once you are out on your own, paying rent and maybe contemplating a family, that $28/hr job that was funding your party life is less cool.
Not saying this should be a reason to skip a job- just that it is a danger for some kids.
That isn't any sort of a ding on teens working. That is an issue of labor laws, minimum wage, and businesses outright overpaying for entry level labor. For a minimum wage to make sense, it can only apply to adults and emancipated minors. Having a different wage floor for dependents seems obvious to me. At the same time, it would open up the possibility of jobs with a low economic value and/or low time investment.
I've seen a ridiculous amount of wage leveling between the bottom and middle. McDonalds pays more in my area than any entry level labor job or entry position for skilled labor. It feels quite a bit like communism to me but implemented through different means. As expected, at the same time the wealthy and powerful have gained more for themselves
"That is an issue of labor laws, minimum wage, and businesses outright overpaying for entry level labor."
Totally agree. As I said this isn't a reason NOT to get a job. Just something to be wary of when your kids start working.
Most companies will help pay for COLLEGE. The 17 year old Drafter I hired while he was still in High School took advantage and now he's a Junior Engineer and I'm back looking for another Drafter.
Who is freaking out? Nothing wrong with kids having age appropriate jobs. They can teach good habits of mind as detailed in the article. I have never bought the argument of "don't make them work, let kids be kids". Sure don't put them in coal mines but a part time job at the local restaurant is no biggie.
This moron: https://twitter.com/bern_identity/status/1645493732240949248
Huh. Well there are some legitimate concerns about exploiting kids, and I personally have seen some kids working in jobs that I'm thinking "man he looks too young to be working", but overall, it's not a big concern I don't think.
I get it. The same people who passed the legislation to block kids from working are freaking out if kids are allowed to work. They probably have nothing to worry about especially if they live in the states who prevent anyone from hiring anyone for under "a living wage" a.k.a. 3-4 times market rate.
A lot of affluent parents have the idea that "school is a job" or otherwise prioritize sports for teens. I didn't come from an affluent family so I actually don't see any value in sports at all, but hey that's just me. I do know that most of the kids I have known, and currently know, who have an after school job, tend to be scrappy go getters. I am planning on funding less when my kids get to 16 because I see the value in having wants that you satisfy yourself. Kids need to see the reward of work which is difficult if they get everything they want without working.
"School is a job" is a reasonable perspective if they actually act like a boss instead of a friend.
This is more than just affluent parents and it is more a problem with parents than with government. As parents prepare kids for life, usually including college, they feel pressured to have kids in school activities and studying. College will give a kid credit for being a third string quarterback, but not for working behind a grill and frier.
I have hired countless people over the years. Many of those have been entry level or early career jobs that pay well and the applicants have college degrees. In 100% of the cases the top candidate had a high school or college job. There are lots of reasons and one is that they interview better. But it is more complex of a reason than they have interview before. They answer questions better by far, especially situational questions. They can provide example of working with others or dealing with a supervisor. The number one piece of advice I would give to kids is to get a job as early as possible.
Just hire a gay pedo in a dress to give the 13 year old a lap dance while he’s working, and it will instantly transform from horrible to mandatory.
"While most of the replies to the video were positive, the pro-union nonprofit that posted it insisted on framing a teenager working for his parents as a bad thing"
Especially since mom and dad might make the kid actually work, and not spend all their time in the break room ranting about management and scheming for union goons.
Home income solution to enable everyone to work online and receive weekly payments to bank acct. Earn over $500 every day and get payouts every week straight to account bank. My last month of income was $30,390 and all I do is work up to 4 hours a day on my computer. Easy work and steady income are great with this job.
More information……………….>>> http://www.jobsrevenue.com
My kids had part time jobs because working teaches people life lessons you cannot get anywhere else. There is no 3-credit class on work skills that can teach you what you can learn on the job. A job gets a kid out of the house and away from the screens. It teaches interpersonal skills for dealing with your co-workers and with customers. It teaches things like getting to work on time and looking presentable. It teaches life lessons like what it is like to work for a crappy boss (they likely hate the job more than you) and doing work you don't always like.
The problem isn't government, it is parents that don't want their children to work. Government never got in the way when I was a kid or when I sent my kids off to their first job.
I'm not convinced getting to work on time is much different than getting to school on time.
Except if the kid doesn't get to school on time it is the parents who get notified. At work your boss is going to talk to the employee and that direct talk is more powerful than secondhand talk from mom and dad.
It's very rare to find an article where everyone in the Reason comments section agrees with the author.
Come on kids - you can do better than Hate-Fil-A: "Want a side of homophobia with those waffle fries?"
Do you check the owner's religious beliefs in all places where you buy goods?
The best argument against this, is Joe Biden and most politicians probably had summer jobs.
First they freaked out over immigrants taking these jobs. Now they freak out over teens taking these jobs. These are literally bottom rung starting jobs. I had one when I was a teen in college. No one freaked out then.
Not to worry, automation will ensure no one will have these jobs. Both liberals and conservatives can then sleep soundly.
"...Both liberals and conservatives can then sleep soundly."
But TDS-addled shits will still be fretting.
Agreed. What else are 13 year-olds who don't get involved in sports or clubs going to do? They sit around playing video games and watching youtube memes. A little work would be very beneficial for many teens.
When you argue from a utilitarian perspective you've already conceded to your opponent. You have said that they have the right to micromanage everyone at gunpoint, but that they shouldn't because whatever, when the proper response to any proposal for a bill of enactment (or against any bill of repeal) is "Who in the exact fuck are you to do that anyway?"
We were talking about the fact that you are so old that when you went to college they used cash, and that girls were girls.
And that he could pay for it plus have cash, with a summer job or three.