Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Prosecutors

Trump's Indictment Illustrates How the Wackos Have Hijacked Politics

Also: The sensitivity readers come for sci-fi anarchist Ursula Le Guin, how foreign trade can make American supply chains more resilient, and more...

Eric Boehm | 4.5.2023 9:40 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Marjorie Taylor Greene Donald Trump indictment Alvin Bragg New York City | Michael Nigro/Sipa USA/Newscom
(Michael Nigro/Sipa USA/Newscom)

Did everyone connected to the Trump indictment take crazy pills? 

It was always obvious that any attempt to bring former President Donald Trump to justice for any alleged crime would be a total media circus—just like most other aspects of Trump's career in politics. That finally happened on Tuesday: Trump was charged in Manhattan with 34 felonies for filing false business records. It's the first time in American history that a former president has been indicted, arraigned, and hauled before a judge to enter a "not guilty" plea.

So the media circus surrounding Tuesday's events made perfect sense. Few other things did.

Let's start with Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, who brought the charges against Trump. He thought this was the best use of his taxpayer-funded office's resources?  For weeks, there had been leaks suggesting that whatever Bragg was cooking up would be a bit outside the norm of a typical prosecution, but the charges unsealed on Tuesday look even weaker than those reports suggested.

"At bottom, however, this case is about a single hush payment that was criminal only if it is construed as a campaign contribution," summed up Reason's Jacob Sullum. "That interpretation is, at best, debatable…If the attempt to keep Daniels quiet does not strike you as an offense worthy of 34 felony charges, you are unlikely to change your mind simply because the Trump Organization kept pieces of paper that mischaracterized the reimbursement for that payment."

Some longtime Trump critics, like former congressman Justin Amash, say Bragg is pushing a flimsy case against the former president.

After reading DA Bragg's indictment of Trump and accompanying statement of facts, I'm stunned any prosecutor would move forward with this. It's even flimsier than we were led to believe. Thirty-four stacked counts, bootstrapped to an unstated crime, to manufacture felony charges.

— Justin Amash (@justinamash) April 4, 2023

Former federal prosecutor Ken White (formerly well-known on Twitter under the moniker "Popehat"), another outspoken Trump critic, posted on Mastodon that he's "unimpressed with the indictment and the statement of facts." Bragg has even generated some skepticism from Vox senior correspondent Ian Millhiser, who never departs from the Democratic Party's talking points on legal issues. (Notably, the White House has been totally silent about this whole matter.)

Who knows how this will shake out in court, but now that the charges are unsealed, it seems pretty obvious that Bragg will have a difficult time scoring a conviction here. Of course, prosecutors are trained (and incentivized) to do this sort of thing all the time and rarely face any consequences for it. If conservatives took a half step back from the specifics of Trump's case, they might find a good reason to support reforms like limiting the power that prosecutors can wield.

Prosecutors can file false charges, lie under oath, conjure fake evidence, impanel false testimony, coerce witnesses—and there is nothing you can do to hold them to account. They are the top law enforcement officer, and they are often above the law. https://t.co/Wc8hFMujSu

— Billy Binion (@billybinion) April 5, 2023

Ah, but alas, the crazy pills. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R–Ga.) organized a protest near where Trump was arraigned on Tuesday and in one interview compared the former president's legal troubles to the persecution of Nelson Mandela and—yes, really—Jesus.

Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA): "Trump is joining some of the most incredible people in history being arrested today. Nelson Mandela was arrested, served time in prison. Jesus! Jesus was arrested and murdered." pic.twitter.com/dSOeHvRnDE

— The Recount (@therecount) April 4, 2023

Trying to keep up, Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D–N.Y.) showed up to shout about how Greene should go home. These are not serious people at the best of times, and they're outright fools when the stakes get higher.

Of course, it also bears mentioning that none of this would be happening if a former Republican president hadn't paid off a porn star to cover up the fact that he'd cheated on his third wife. If we're going to add up the crazy points, that might still be the wildest part of all this.

Tuesday also gave us this wonderful illustration of Twitter But In Real Life, as Trump supporters and critics shouted at each other from behind opposing sets of police barricades.

Trump supporters and anti-Trump protesters are separated by metal barriers and heckling each other pic.twitter.com/aHGzqlrL74

— Tess Owen (@misstessowen) April 4, 2023

There are nearly 150 major professional sports teams in the United States and hundreds more if you include stuff like Major League Soccer and minor league baseball teams. My advice to these people: Pick one to root for. It'll be a lot more satisfying, even if they never win anything.

In the middle of this maelstrom of insanity, there was a least one glimmer of hope. Several couples showed up at the same Manhattan courthouse where Trump was being processed to get married on Tuesday. "Media crews and people carrying 'Trump 2024' signs and 'Lock Him Up' signs were in City Hall Park. Regardless of the frenzy nearby, [Jerica Guerra] and [Natalie Bonilla] were on clouds, focused on celebrating each other," The New York Times reported.

They weren't the only ones.

Good morning from downtown Manhattan where this lovely couple is getting married right next door to the media scrum waiting for the Trump indictment. pic.twitter.com/vJxcxZDgKX

— Soo Youn (@lalasoo) April 4, 2023

And, yes, maybe it takes a big dose of a different kind of crazy pills to do that sort of thing too. But here are some people doing what mattered the most to them and simultaneously doing their best to ignore the political wackos—from Bragg and Trump on down—who could have ruined their day.

America, there might be a lesson there.


FREE MINDS 

The sensitivity readers have come for Agatha Christie, Roald Dahl, and now science fiction and fantasy writer Ursula Le Guin, whose feminist, left-anarchist politics are occasionally libertarian-adjacent and generally not considered "problematic."

The New York Times reports that Le Guin's use of words as innocuous as "lame" and "dumb" has been deemed too caustic for modern readers' delicate eyes. Theo Downes-Le Guin, Ursula's son and literary executor, has agreed to remove those words from future editions of the author's Catwings series, which is aimed at children:

At first, he was torn about whether he should approve the edits, which consisted of a handful of words across several books. "Ursula was extremely careful with her words, so a substitute is never going to have exactly the same meaning," he said in an interview.

He ultimately decided that the revisions would benefit readers. In the new editions, which will be released this fall by Simon & Schuster's Atheneum Books, a handful of words, including "lame" and "dumb," have been replaced, and a note has been added to alert readers about the update.

That's…well, lame and dumb. (If you've never read it, check out Le Guin's brilliant novel The Left Hand of Darkness before they get to that one too.)


FREE MARKETS 

Contrary to the belief pushed by some nationalist politicians, foreign trade didn't make the United States more vulnerable to supply chain disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic. In fact, it was exactly the opposite, according to a new paper published by the Brookings Institution:

We demonstrate that global trade was remarkably resilient during the pandemic and that supply shortages would likely have been more severe in the absence of international trade.

…

In short, unless a sector is highly dependent on a single import source (as is the case with the dependence of the energy sector in Europe on Russia), international trade seems to contribute to resilience, not compromise it. Hence, it is unlikely that trade restrictions will improve countries' resilience.

Trade restrictions won't work, but lots of countries (including America) are trying them anyway.


QUICK HITS

• The most expensive judicial election in American history ended Tuesday night with a victory for progressives as Janet Protasiewicz, a liberal Milwaukee County judge, was elected to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The result flips the ideological balance of the seven-member court in a crucial swing state.

• Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, announced plans for widespread occupational licensing reforms.

• So you want to build a clean energy project? Hope you've got the proper permits!

The federal permitting process for transmission projects is absurdly bureaucratic pic.twitter.com/TKtY5kyVGK

— Alec Stapp (@AlecStapp) April 4, 2023

 

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Dump the Politicized Case Against Trump and Make Way for Serious Investigations

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

ProsecutorsReason RoundupPoliticsDonald TrumpFree MarketsFree TradeNew York CityCriminal JusticeCourtsOvercriminalization
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (362)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Trump's Indictment Illustrates How the Wackos Have Hijacked Politics

    I'm not voting for boring.

    1. Nardz   2 years ago

      Reason says this like they didn't support years of a fictional Russia conspiracy theory, Blasey-Ford's suddenly remembered after 30 years "credible" rape accusation, mass testing and contact tracing to deal with a mild flu, or "mostly peaceful" protests to burn down small businesses across the country

      1. Derp-o-Matic 6000   2 years ago

        And if everyone had just shut up and submitted like good subjects, we wouldn't have to be doing this today, would we?

        1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

          That's good libratarian subjects.

          1. ConnieTaylor   2 years ago (edited)

            Online, Google paid $45 per hour. Nine months have passed since my close relative last had a job, but in the previous month she earned $10500 by working 8 hours a day from home. Now is the time for everyone to try this job by using this website…

            Click the link—↠ http://Www.Smartjob1.com

            1. TahliaOFlynn   2 years ago (edited)

              Online, Google paid $55 per hour. Nine months have passed since my close relative last had a job, but in the previous month she earned $11500 by working 8 hours a day from home. Now is the time for everyone to try this job by using this website…

              Click the link—————↠ https://Www.Coins71.Com

      2. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

        Is Fatass Donnie being Benghazied? Poor persecuted Donnie!

        1. Sevo   2 years ago

          Turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

        2. Brian   2 years ago

          Considering that Hillary Clinton was never charged with a crime: no, he’s not being Benghazied.

          1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

            But the bogus Benghazi "investigation" was purely a political ploy to weaken her in front of the election.

            Same motive with these charges.

            (yes, I am taking the pro-Trump side in the argument.)

            1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

              So someone blowing up things and killing diplomats is "bogus" to you?

              1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

                Falsely blaming Hil-Dog is, you moron.

                1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                  The buck stops with her, dipshit.

                  1. Sevo   2 years ago

                    turd is too stupid to know when he's lying.

                2. Sevo   2 years ago

                  turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, a TDS-addled asshole and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
                  If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
                  turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

                3. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

                  How about falsely blaming a YouTube video uploaded a decade prior to the incident and jailing the poor son of a bitch to deflect from Hillary's conclusively proven gun-running operation that got a saintly faggot murdered?

            2. Brian   2 years ago

              An investigation is one thing. Actually bringing charges against a political opponent for political reasons is quite something else.

              I’d say Trump is being “Putined” by people who are supposedly above Putin.

            3. Inquisitive Squirrel   2 years ago (edited)

              The self imposed ignorance and gaslighting you all on the left have to do to uphold your desired narratives is really awe-inspiring at this point.

              1. Joe Brandon   2 years ago

                ^

            4. Paulpemb   2 years ago

              If I fucked up bad enough at my job to get 4 people killed, I expect I would have to do more than answer a few questions. Especially if I immediately declared that I deserved a promotion.

        3. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

          Yeah I remember when the DA of Fargo charged Hillary Clinton with felony obstruction of justice by bootstrapping it to misdemeanor campaign finance violations due to her perjured testimony on Benghazi shreek.

          Jesus Christ you really are seething today. It's fucking delicious.

          I haven't been this amused since the time you got your original Sarah Palin's Buttplug account banned for posting dark web links to hardcore child pornography.

      3. mad.casual   2 years ago (edited)

        “credible”

        *Superficially* credible. An unintentionally-revealing oxymoron that, IMO, went straight into the top 5 when stated and has yet to be displaced.

    2. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      I’m not voting for boring.

      Considering we're well into the Caesarism stage of the life cycle of a Republic and charging headlong towards the Fall stage, might as well just go ahead and vote for the most batshit crazy person on the ballot in any given election. Since it's all going down anyway might as well have some lulz in the process.

      Vermin Supreme 2024

      1. Nardz   2 years ago

        No.
        Trump is much more entertaining than the "libertarian" clown act

      2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        Chicago just did that yesterday. At least we'll have a controlled experiment to see how it goes.

      3. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

        Dude, we're not even close to the Caesarism stage yet. We haven't even gotten to the Marius/Sulla stage, although we're getting pretty fucking close now.

        1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago (edited)

          We really bear a closer resemblance to Weimar Germany than Late Republic Rome right now, including the promotion of transhumanist ideology and surgical procedures.

        2. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

          Perhaps not literal Caesarism, but more like a "Caesarism of the bureaucracy" aka "the Deep State." The career bureaucrats are the ones really running the show, the veneer of "democracy" is just there to trick the peasants into thinking we have a say in things. Kind of similar to the way during the late stage of the Roman Republic there was still a Senate but they were essentially useless since all the real power was in the hands of the Emperor.

          Admittedly it was a clunky analogy. Weimar Germany may be a closer analogy, especially with hyper inflation and other parallels you mentioned.

          1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

            To be fair, German philosophers have largely been nihilistic and borderline insane for a couple hundred years now.

    3. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

      Did someone in the protests on Twitter just say: "Ya Mama?" It's been long while since I heard that one!
      🙂

      Meanwhile, here is some nice, cozy snuggly reading for an isolated parking space with the motor on, for an upstairs apartment with multiple locks, or for a quiet camping trip alone in the woods:

      Civilization by Flash Mob by Todd Seavey
      https://www.splicetoday.com/politics-and-media/civilization-by-flash-mob

  2. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    It was always obvious that any attempt to bring former President Donald Trump to justice for any alleged crime would be a total media circus...

    Apparently it hasn't gotten time yet to get off this tiger ride. When it finally does...

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      But a CNN Poll finds 60% of CNN viewers support Trump indictment even though they have no clue what’s in it.
      So the ride is speeding up.

      1. Troglodyte Rex   2 years ago

        So...60% of 3 people?

        1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

          There may be more viewers than that if you count all the people stuck having to watch it while in their dentist's waiting room.

          Seriously though, if the TV in your dentist's waiting room is still tuned to CNN you should probably switch dentists ASAP.

          1. Idaho Bob   2 years ago

            My doctor's waiting room was playing Fox News my last visit. While arguably better than CNN, still awful to endure without a remote at hand.

            1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

              The only reason I can think of why a dentist's office would tune the TVs to CNN is because they know that the gritting and grinding of teeth will result in more money in their pockets.

              1. Sevo   2 years ago

                So what excuse do the airline gates have?

                1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

                  Maybe there's collusion between the airlines and "Big Dental?"

                  Or they're just seeing if they can make their customers even more miserable than they already are.

                2. Ersatz   2 years ago (edited)

                  they are paid to carry it
                  -CNN actually pays airports to carry them

    2. perlmonger   2 years ago

      I've realized what I really want from 2024.

      I want To DeSantis to win the presidency... and make Donald Trump his Press Secretary.

      Can you even imagine how those press conferences would go? 😀

      1. Joe Brandon   2 years ago

        I like it!

  3. rev-arthur-l-kuckland   2 years ago

    Is bohem learning what TDS is just now?

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 years ago

      Just to the point that people of normal intelligence and possessing a capacity for reason can no longer pretend otherwise.

      From everything analysis I have read, this is a desperate last ditch political prosecution to impact on his future as a candidate. Banana republic level.

      1. Nardz   2 years ago

        But I've been told it's 12d chess to make sure Trump's the candidate (because that's totes how the Ds do things)...

        1. Derp-o-Matic 6000   2 years ago

          If Trump is in prison, that would make his state of residence New York, so DeSantis could be his running mate after all.

          Brilliant!

  4. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago (edited)

    He thought this was the best use of his taxpayer-funded office’s resources?

    While not nearly analogous to Mike Nifong’s crimes, Bragg is acting as a political animal here, more so than most elected prosecutors. I would be surpised if this gives him the career path he thinks it will. MSNBC might not even care to retain his services after he loses this.

    1. Mickey Rat   2 years ago

      Bragg did what he said he was going to do in his campaign for the office. The answer is "yes", because he ran on convicting Trump of something. That this is the something he came up with shows how partisan and corrupt that campaign promise was.

      1. mad.casual   2 years ago

        Trump: "Lock her up!"
        Bragg: "Hold my brake cleaner."

    2. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 years ago

      America likes winners; Braggs won't be liked. But we'll see how the judiciary responds shortly. If I were the judge, I would dismiss the charges with prejudice on the first motion.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        Given the judge, this, strange as it is, will be railroaded through. It'll stop at the appeals level.

        1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 years ago

          Maybe but seeing the legal uliminaries all trash the case may just give the judge pause to following Braggs into legal oblivion.

        2. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

          It’ll stop at the appeals level.

          Are we sure the appeals courts in NY aren't just as corrupt and partisan? I don't know, I think they'll come up with some excuse to deny the appeal too. Hopefully I'm just living up to my screen name.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            Fair enough. It might stop at the appeals level. We'll see how far someone wants to take this kangaroo court.

            1. Jerry B.   2 years ago

              https://babylonbee.com/news/judge-for-trump-trial-revealed-to-be-a-kangaroo-in-a-powdered-wig

              1. perlmonger   2 years ago

                *lmao*

    3. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

      This is New York City, 80% of eligible voters don't vote. It's how DeBlasio gets a landslide of 15%, same with Adams. Bragg wont be turned out, he may even be elected mayor.

  5. sarcasmic   2 years ago

    Is everyone in bed mourning or what?

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      You can tell what people are saying by what they aren’t saying, or something like that.

      1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

        Sarcasmic put everyone on mute again so he's imagining all sorts of things.

    2. JesseAz   2 years ago

      They were in the thread with you cheering on political prosecutions retard.

      1. Derp-o-Matic 6000   2 years ago

        Dude, it's 10:30. Sarc is already too drunk to remember that.

    3. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

      It involves bodily secretions, yes, but no tears.
      🙂

  6. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Good morning from downtown Manhattan where this lovely couple is getting married right next door to the media scrum waiting for the Trump indictment.

    If they're not same-sex of color, then they deserve the disruption.

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 years ago

      I know; they look like breeders. How unsavory. I can only imagine the celebratory rutting that followed.

  7. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    He ultimately decided that the revisions would benefit readers.

    In other words, not interested in a future struggle session.

    1. Ronbback   2 years ago

      the right is setting age limits on certain works and the left calls it banning. Meanwhile the left is actually censoring books for all age groups. its crazy town around here

  8. SRG   2 years ago

    international trade seems to contribute to resilience, not compromise it.

    Which is hardly surprising - indeed, it's highly predictable - but the anti- capitalist/free market types on both sides won't want to hear it.

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      Boaf sydes!

      1. SRG   2 years ago

        Sometimes there are indeed elements on both sides who agree with something. There is such a thing as an anti-capitalist or anti-free-market right-winger - at least some Trump supporters fall into that category.

        1. mad.casual   2 years ago

          BOAF SIDEZ!

        2. Sevo   2 years ago

          "There is such a thing as an anti-capitalist or anti-free-market right-winger – at least some Trump supporters fall into that category."

          I'm sure an obnoxiously arrogant shit like you has a cite for that claim, but it seems to have gone missing.

    2. Ronbback   2 years ago

      Meanwhile no matter what the study says we know the international system broke down during covid. simple fact no matter how they twist it to say otherwise

      1. SRG   2 years ago

        = "I don't care what the research shows, I have my believes"

        1. Idaho Bob   2 years ago

          Sounds very Branch Covidian. Blindly accept what your betters tell you.

          FYI - The international chemical market has still not completely recovered. Force Majeures are still in place in the world epoxy markets, specifically brominated epoxies. Ocean shipping to Europe takes 3 months, instead of 6 weeks. This is for dedicated 40' containers.

        2. JesseAz   2 years ago

          How much research in economics is repeatable and valid for predictions? How many false studies do you think there are?

          Are you truly this stupid shrike? Reason just had a very good article on flawed studies last week.

        3. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

          Cite a single piece of research that shows international supply chains didn't fail during COVID, shreek. The link is probably lost somewhere in that thread you got nuked for posting dark web links to hardcore child pornography when you got your Sarah Palin's Buttplug account banned.

    3. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

      Just look how resilient our supply chains turned out to be during the COVID panic when China shut off the flow of medical supplies, right shreek?

  9. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    We demonstrate that global trade was remarkably resilient during the pandemic...

    Well, obviously the pajama class wasn't going to push to restrict too harshly the movements of the functionaries who bring them things.

    1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

      It's fun to lock all your servants in the dungeon but someone has to clean up after the orgies.

      1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago (edited)

        someone has to clean up after the orgies.

        Wow, I’ve now found an excuse to use this clip twice in one week. We live in interesting times for sure…

        1. TheReEncogitationer   2 years ago

          Wow! That's almost art imitating life at the store I work at on the West side of town!
          🙂

          1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

            The funniest thing about that scene is the guy who gets offended is buying glass cleaner and paper towels.

            I didn't even notice it the first couple of times I saw that movie.

  10. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    The most expensive judicial election in American history ended Tuesday night with a victory for progressives as Janet Protasiewicz...

    Has the GOP not figured out ballet harvesting yet?

    1. Mickey Rat   2 years ago

      It is difficult for the GOP to out corrupt the Democrats. Having a vestigial conscience is a liability in politics.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        They could ask Chicago how it's done. They should also ask how to lock people out of their voting place as happened there yesterday. Yes, a few Chicago Public Schools used for voting had their doors locked and the voting entrances unmarked.

        https://twitter.com/kim_chee27/status/1643264959328006144

        They are doing everything in their power to shut out your voters @PaulVallas. I went to polling place today at Seward School & they had their doors locked. Waited 30 min while I called ward office & BOE. I was told by election judges they were told to leave the doors locked.

        1. HorseConch   2 years ago

          The democrats out democratted the democrats on that one. They said there are still a bunch of ballots in the mail, but Vallas conceded anyways. Can't have a leftist asshole obstructing an even farther leftist asshole from doing democracy.

      2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

        "Having a vestigial conscience..."

        The GOP? The party full of supposedly born-again Christian people who rally around a serial adulterer as long as he holds up a Bible once in a while for a photo op.

        1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

          Yeah remember how popular Trump was among the GOP politicians Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq.? Another BOAF SIDEZ bullseye!

    2. Anomalous   2 years ago

      Ballet harvesting? Is there a new crop of dancers?

      1. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

        Yes.

        1. perlmonger   2 years ago

          It's great exerscythe!

    3. perlmonger   2 years ago

      Is that when you scythe down dancers?

  11. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

    Of course, it also bears mentioning that none of this would be happening if a former Republican president hadn't paid off a porn star to cover up the fact that he'd cheated on his third wife. If we're going to add up the crazy points, that might still be the wildest part of all this.

    Was this a good thing to do? No. But it seems like blaming Trump for the fact that he's being prosecuted for what isn't and shouldn't be a crime. And to claim that's the wildest part of this, the fact that a billionaire tycoon slept with a porn star and then paid her to shut up about it? That's incredible to me.

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      No other wealthy man has ever tapped some strange and regretted it.

      1. Ajsloss   2 years ago

        You don't have to be wealthy. Watch Maury Povich.

    2. rev-arthur-l-kuckland   2 years ago

      She was wearing a short skirt so she had it comming

    3. sarcasmic   2 years ago

      I'm sure you were right there defending Slick Willie, saying all he did was get a blowjob, when he was charged with lying under oath, right?

      1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

        Look at what I quoted, sarc. Boehm says it never would have happened if Trump hadn't boned a porn star, as if it's blaming him for boning a porn star. And he claims that's the wildest thing about all of this, when it's really not that wild at all.

        Your attempt to make this into some strange whataboutism is nonsensical.

        1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

          My point is that Trump supporters who likely supported Clinton's prosecution are being dismissive in the same manner that his supporters were, while the very same people who dismissed Clinton's charges likely support Trump's prosecution.

          Principles shminciples.

          1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

            Clinton lied under oath.

            1. DeAnnP   2 years ago

              ...and Trump falsified business records. Goose, gander, etc

              1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                How is an NDA not a legal business expense?

                1. windycityattorney   2 years ago

                  Big brains Trump agreed to pay Michael Cohen - Thomas Cooley grad extraordinaire...350k to give Stormy Daniels 130k.

                  You figure out why one NDA contract equals 220k in legal services? That is like $110,000 per billable hour. For Michael Cohen.

                  1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

                    Lol. This is 4 times today poor shreek has replied from the wrong handle. I pity the poor little boy locked in his basement. He's going to get it harder than usual when shreek is finally able to achieve an erection again after today's humiliation.

                    You might want look up what a retainer is if you're going to pose as an attorney, shreek.

              2. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

                LOL

              3. JesseAz   2 years ago

                Also the statute requires intent to defraud. Who was defrauded?

              4. Sevo   2 years ago

                "...and Trump falsified business records. Goose, gander, etc"

                And TDS-addled shits like DeAnnP will lie through their teeth an an attempt to justify their idiocy.
                Stuff your TDS up your ass, fuck off and die, shit-pile.

              5. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

                Trump falsified business records.

                Yet, not even their indictments will tell you how.

              6. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

                Trump didn't falsify business records, and that's not even quite what he's being charged with, shreek.

          2. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

            Your point is utterly unresponsive to mine, then, and you admit it. It's just not a good point.

          3. JesseAz   2 years ago

            When did trump lie under oath retard?

            1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

              It's a rough day for Pluggo, he should be out partying, maybe even catching himself a fresh one, but instead he's stuck explaining how it's okay to criminally charge some one with literally nothing.

          4. Mickey Rat   2 years ago

            Clinton's troubles revolved around him perjuring himself in a workplace sexual harassment case the law about Clinton politically supported. What Trump did was sleazy, but it is a bizarre stretch to say it us illegal. The two situations are not comparable in the details.

            1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

              The more I think about it, the more I realize I was mistaken.

              Clinton's defenders said he was prosecuted over a blowjob (in the Oval Office no less, which makes him cool), not perjury.

              Trump's defenders are not saying that he's being prosecuted for boning a porn star and then saying that makes him cool.

              So I withdraw my argument.

              1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                Youre a fucking idiot you mean.

                1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   2 years ago

                  Clinton stared right into a camera and lied to the entire country while on the taxpayers dime. Then allowed his lawyers to attempt to redefine the word "is".

                  Sarc is a gaslighter and he clearly respects the craft.

            2. Syd Henderson   2 years ago

              I figure that if Trump gets a halfway decent lawyer he'll get away with some misdemeanor charges and probably get some minor punishment including fines, but if he sends in the ones he used post-election he'll get the death penalty even if New York doesn't have one.

              1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

                He has lawyered up for this case with competent business lawyers. They are not letting Alina Habba anywhere near the courtoom.

                1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

                  Maybe he can retain your boy Avenatti once he's released and gets his law license back.

          5. JesseAz   2 years ago

            I'm actually curious as to which principle sarc thinks he is upholding cheering on political prosecutions. Here and for non violent j6 defendants.

          6. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

            "My point is that Trump supporters who likely supported Clinton’s prosecution..."

            Stop arguing against strawmen, thats a good piece of advice to get you started.

            What if I dont like Trump, dont like the Clintons, dont like Biden, and would vote for Trump > Biden. Am I still allowed to see this as a political witch hunt, or do I need signed contemporaneous evidence that I didnt care about the BJ?

            People of all political views, who aren't indoctrinated zombies, can smell bullshit friend

            1. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

              +1

            2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

              +1

            3. sarcasmic   2 years ago

              What if I dont like Trump, dont like the Clintons, dont like Biden, and would vote for Trump > Biden.

              In a contest between Giant Douche and Turd Sandwich, who is who, and how do you decide?

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                You sometimes hold your nose and pick the one that will do the least harm.

              2. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

                Very easy. The current elites in the democratic party are extremely anti-freedom, and the policies they advocate for (GND, DEI, affirmative action, gender confusion for kids) are dangerous. Most importantly, they openly pursue blatant authoritarianism and hide behind 'science' as an excuse. Also they want to keep increasing my taxes to pay for all this shit that I dont want them to do.

                I already had 4 years of Trump, and he wasn't pushing any of that shit. 4 years (almost) of a great economy, he lowered my taxes, he didn't escalate any wars, he's not a giant pussy, he doesn't constantly bitch about how America is a terrible reprehensible country, and doesn't apologize for us. His SCOTUS picks may buy us some time to combat some of the insanity from the left.

                He says stupid shit, and honestly doesn't get a lot done because of the fact that he is constantly worried about petty grievances, or bullshitting off the cuff about stuff he cant really every get done. He put some people into positions that very were dumb choices (Tillerson, Bolton, his son/daughter, to name a few).

                Do I want a guy who spends most of his time tweeting about horsefaced women, and not getting a lot of policy done, or a guy who is a brain dead demented puppet for all of the worst initiatives of the left wing, while telling me that I need to 'pay my fair share' to make these things (that I detest) happen.

                It really is a no-brainer (no im not talking about Biden here)

                1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

                  Fair enough. I can't do it though. Give me someone I can vote for and I'll reregister. I'm all done voting against the worse of two evils, or wasting my vote on a third party.

                  1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                    Because you're a leftist defending idiot.

                  2. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

                    I’m all done voting against the worse of two evils, or wasting my vote on a third party.

                    What a coincidence that happened right around the same time you were convicted of a felony and lost your right to vote.

                2. perlmonger   2 years ago

                  I dunno, the son in law managed pretty well in the Middle East.

              3. Super Scary   2 years ago

                A giant douche would at least have some utility. All you have with the sandwich is two ruined pieces of bread.

              4. TrickyVic (old school)   2 years ago

                ""In a contest between Giant Douche and Turd Sandwich, who is who, and how do you decide?""

                Which one promises more freedom and less government control of my life? I could stand a Douche or Turd if they can accomplish that.

            4. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

              Stop arguing against strawmen, thats a good piece of advice to get you started.

              It is good advice, but let's acknowledge that this rule is violated about twenty times a day here in the commentariat.

              1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                Cite? Or did you just make a strawman?

          7. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            Dude, Clinton:

            1. Committed acts that would get him bounced out as CEO of any company, namely that of using interns under his employment for sex. It's conduct unbecoming of a President.
            2. Lied under oath about it and committed a felony in doing so.

            In retrospect, it's a shame he wasn't tossed from office.

            1. mad.casual   2 years ago

              Yeah. Tastes aside, I didn't have a problem with him getting a blowjob in office and said as much. I had a problem with him telling a lie about getting a blowjob under oath while Clarence Thomas got raked over the coals for *allegedly* finding a curly hair on his can of Coke.

              But "Principles, schminciples." is a pretty accurate summation of the entirety of sarc's being on the topic.

              1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

                Did you ever make arguments without snide personal attacks, or was I just not paying attention?

                1. JesseAz   2 years ago

                  Your comment didn't have those? Oh. Forgot. King hypocrite. Lol.

                  1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

                    He gets especially bitchy when he's been bested at his own game. Which is why he spends 16 hours a day seething like a bitch on the rag, because he's just as bad at trying to be clever and snotty as he is at trying to be insightful and serious.

            2. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

              In retrospect, it’s a shame he wasn’t tossed from office.

              Indeed, If the Senate dems weren't so short sighted they would have sent both Clintons to the ass heap of history and had President Al Gore for two terms plus the unfinished Clinton term. We would have been spared W's bullshit as well. I don't think Gore would have been any good but in hindsight could he have been worse?

        2. A Thinking Mind   2 years ago

          Beyond that, there's still a principled distinction to make if I want to say it's more distasteful for the sitting President to get a blowjob from an unpaid intern inside of the Oval Office than it is for a private citizen to have an illicit affair with a porn star.

          1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

            Umm, yeah, I'd agree.

        3. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

          It is crazy, when that same person who banged a porn star and cheated on his third wife is supposedly the political savior of the party that is supposed to be all about family values and Christian faith.

          1. JesseAz   2 years ago

            Speaking of strawman arguments.

          2. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

            Now do Catholic Joe Biden and San Fran Nan and their Moloch-worshiping abortion fanaticism. BOAF SIDEZ!!!!! amirite Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq.?

      2. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

        Maybe go after ENB and crew for their hypocrisy?

        Clinton used his power and status, as a straight, cis, whYte male (and the most powerful man in the world, at the time) to coerce an unpaid, overworked intern into sex, while cheating on his strong, powerful, independent waman of a wife. Very frowned on by ENB and the me2 crew.

        Trump fucked a sex worker, and she ended up making bank by violating the NDA she signed, which she also made bank on. So she violated the contract that 2 knowing, consensual adults signed (something libertarians should appreciate), and got fame, empowerment, and tons of money for 15 minutes of selling her pussy. How is this not a victory lap for the "abortion and sexwork above all" libertines on this site?

        1. Ersatz   2 years ago

          the man makes some good points here...

        2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

          What does ENB have to do with this? She didn't even write today's roundup.

          1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

            It wasn't cryptic you faux-autistic retard. The same people taking different positions on whoredom based on the politics. Get it, Episarch/Bo Cara Esq., or do we need to break out the crayons for you?

      3. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

        The key difference is that Slick Willie actually did, unequivocally, lie under oath and admitted it. And he wasn't charged with a crime, he was impeached. Whoever is feeding you your talking points is almost as fucking stupid as you are.

    4. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

      "And to claim that’s the wildest part of this, the fact that a billionaire tycoon slept with a porn star and then paid her to shut up about it? "

      And to claim it, while existing in a world in which playboy billionaires are a known quantity (and fairly standard), Epsteins shit is out in the open, and political figures such as Kennedy, Clinton, Anthony Weiner have existed in the past....

      Its about the most mundane and trite part of the story tbh

    5. damikesc   2 years ago

      Weird seeing Reason opposing sex work.

      1. Spiritus Mundi   2 years ago

        ENB couldn't do it, Boehm had to pitch hit.

    6. Ronbback   2 years ago

      boning porn stars is not illegal and neither are NDAs and the payout was also legal depending on the days interpretation and if not the most that should have happened was he would have been fined like Hillary and Obama were fined for also miss representing certain payments

    7. mad.casual   2 years ago

      That’s incredible to me.

      Yeah, after John Kennedy, Ted Kennedy, Clinton, Anthony Weiner, Anita Hill, Christine Blasey-Ford, Harvey Weinstein, Jeff Epstein, Eric Swalwell, Katie Hill, Jackie Coakley, Emma Sulkowicz... Ivana Trump, Marla Maples, Melania Trump.

      It's like saying you weren't sure if Pam Anderson and Tommy Lee were having sex until you saw the video.

    8. Cronut   2 years ago

      "Rich guy gets blackmailed by aging slut he banged 10 years ago" is hardly the most wild thing about this.

    9. Mike Laursen   2 years ago (edited)

      Conspicuously absent from Trump’s recent public appearances: his wife, Melania Trump.

  12. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, announced plans for widespread occupational licensing reforms.

    Until he starts getting phone calls.

    1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 years ago

      Do you want Marylanders crossing the souhern border and stealing your jobs?

    2. Jerry B.   2 years ago

      Now they need a new bureaucracy to reform the occupational licensing bureaucracy.

    3. jimc5499   2 years ago

      The Unions have been pushing for increased licensing. They are also pushing to be the ones that award the licenses.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        Where? The unions in Illinois have been trying to force licensed professionals, surveyors in particular, to be reclassified so they can be forced to become union members. We, as licensed professionals, have been fighting the unions tooth and nail for over a decade now on this.

  13. Fist of Etiquette   2 years ago

    So you want to build a clean energy project? Hope you've got the proper permits!

    We can't let just anyone bilk the rubes.

    1. rev-arthur-l-kuckland   2 years ago

      Of cource all of those steps can be replaced with a donation to the Clinton foundation

      1. Ronbback   2 years ago

        thats the thing isn't it, its not about following the correct buracracy its about giving the government and NGOs their "fair" share.

        when i say fair share i really mean bribe

      2. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

        all of those steps can be replaced with a donation to the Clinton foundation

        "You can either deal with this bureaucratic clusterfuck or you can slip a few briefcases full of cash to the the Right People. Your choice."

        This is how everything works now. We're just a 3rd world banana republic with a thin veneer of wealth.

  14. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

    … next door to the media scrum…

    Read it as media scum at first. Made more sense.

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 years ago

      The scumiest scum.

      1. Sometimes a Great Notion   2 years ago (edited)

        Worse than Mos Eisley

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          Worse than Chicago City Hall?

    2. Sevo   2 years ago

      Me, too.

  15. SRG   2 years ago (edited)

    And as far as Ursula Le Guin is concerned, as with the trade example, retaining her language builds resilience. It is reasonable to suppose that there’s some optimal trade-off between building resilience and avoiding offence, bur the current pressure from some on the left is to refuse to recognise any such trade-off, and to avoid any imaginable offence. And apparently the offence that some of us take at such bowdlerisation is not worthy of consideration.

    FWIW I second the recommendation of "Left Hand of Darkness".

    1. Jefferson's Ghost   2 years ago

      Read it in the early '70's. Very good read.

      1. rev-arthur-l-kuckland   2 years ago

        I'm going to wait for the sensitive version to be released. I find the term lame extreamly offensive. I can't believe I live in a world of retard faggot that complain about making books more sensitive!

        Side note. I would love to see sensitivity reader edit Finnigan wake. Granted they would need far more intelligent people than currently exist in publishing

    2. Mickey Rat   2 years ago

      As someone wrote: "Sensitivity readers posit a reader who is maximally sensitive and unintelligent."

      1. SRG   2 years ago

        Yup. And can you imagine what kind of person wants to be a sensitivity reader in the first place? Oy!

        1. Jefferson's Ghost   2 years ago

          "...can you imagine what kind of person wants to be a sensitivity reader..."

          Yes I can. I have met a couple or three during my travels. It wasn't pleasant.

          1. Ersatz   2 years ago

            someone else met a few

    3. Fats of Fury   2 years ago

      The previous generation of K-12 students were rewarded with gold stars for finding the racism in just about anything. This new generation is trained to find the offense.

    4. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

      One has to wonder if these sensitivity readers have ever encountered actual children. "Dumb" and "lame" are pretty tame compared to have kids actually talk to each other, even among the most well-mannered.

      1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

        shreek is pretty used to hearing things like "fuck you, you faggot pedophile rapist!" from 8 year old boys, I'm sure he's up on all the latest offensive words the kiddies use.

    5. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

      So when you got your Sarah Palin's Buttplug account banned for posting dark web links to hardcore child pornography, you were just building up our resilience, eh shreek?

  16. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

    MIL is over at the house this week. She always watches throw-away, terrible shows. But the one she had on yesterday had some interesting story lines. Will Trent (seriously, its a very cookie cutter crap show).

    The part I that pings my radar, is Trent (ambiguous race but kind of hispanic looking?) is desperately throwing himself into a scuffle to interrupt a dangerous group without his partner (strong, black woman) there to back him up, because he HAS to stop what's about to happen, even though it might get him killed.

    What is he trying to stop you say? 'The Confederates', a group of armed white-nationalists (who associate with neo-nazis) are getting armed up and revved up to go and murder a bunch of peaceful protestors, who just want to take down statues...

    You have to give them points on the propaganda front. The level of gaslighting here is at 1000, and its produced, packaged, and distributed for a TV audience to drool over. An audience that likely doesnt read, and doesnt seek any information outside of the crafted bubble made for them.

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 years ago

      As when I got home the other day and my wife [works from home] had on "New Amsterdam." A hospital psychologist was rebuking some teen's parents over their concern about their child embarking on gender change before they could vote, enter into a contract, or even drive a car. "I'M REFERRING HER TO SURGERY!" was the decision of the forthright, progressive, and morally outraged psychologist.

      My response: "How can you watch this shit?"

    2. Dillinger   2 years ago

      >>ambiguous race but kind of hispanic looking?

      chick in the trailer says he's objectively hot lol

  17. Jefferson's Ghost   2 years ago

    "Theo Downes-Le Guin, Ursula's son and literary executor, has agreed to remove those words from future editions of the author's Catwings series, which is aimed at children..."

    Methinks Theo needs to grow a couple.

    1. SRG   2 years ago

      Theo needs to grow a couple.

      No shit.

      1. Jefferson's Ghost   2 years ago

        ++

    2. damikesc   2 years ago

      He has.

      But ovaries.

      1. Jefferson's Ghost   2 years ago

        Well, you might be correct. For sure his mother had more cohones.

  18. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/Outkick/status/1643601883058118658?t=X3HcSCpBynHN2TMZDrwXfQ&s=19

    "They can have that spotlight. We’ll go to the Obamas, we’ll see Michelle, we’ll see Barack."

    LSU star Angel Reese is threatening to boycott the White House visit after Jill Biden suggested inviting Iowa.

    Justified or overreaction?

    [Link]

    1. Quo Usque Tandem   2 years ago

      The enemy of my enemy comes to mind.

    2. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      LSU star Angel Reese

      Who? Oh, a female basketball player. That's why I've never heard of this bitch.

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

        Even the slobbering over Caitlin Clark is completely overblown. Her main skill seems to be chucking deep shots from nearly half-court on a semi-regular basis.

        1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

          So like a female Steph Curry?

        2. Dillinger   2 years ago

          Jenny Chitwood

  19. Rich   2 years ago

    "Ursula was extremely careful with her words, so a substitute is never going to have exactly the same meaning," he said in an interview. He ultimately decided that the revisions would benefit readers.

    Can't wait until the revisionists go after artworks. "Les Demoiselles d'Avignon had to be retouched to make it more palatable to modern sensitivities. Although Picasso was extremely careful with his brushstrokes, he was a misogynist, and even claimed that 'if it has a beard then it's a man'."

    1. SRG   2 years ago

      Revisions on one side, bans or firings on the other. Intolerant pussies, basically.

      1. Ronbback   2 years ago

        there are no bans just age limits while revisions are like ISIS tearing down historical artifacts.

        1. SRG   2 years ago

          That a ban is limited doesn't make it not a ban, At least you implicitly agree with me about the firings.

          1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

            Not being able to put illustrated guides for how a child should give a blowjob to an adult man in public school libraries is not a "limited" ban either, shreek. And no radical Marxist piece of shit has been fired either. Ronbback wasn't conceding your point there, he probably just ignored it since it's a complete and total non-sequitur.

      2. rev-arthur-l-kuckland   2 years ago

        Not spending taxpayer money on it is not a ban

  20. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    The CTU wins the mayoral election and Chicago loses.

    https://www.illinoispolicy.org/ap-brandon-johnson-wins-chicago-mayoral-election/

    Johnson won 51% of the vote with 99% of precincts reporting as of 9:45 p.m. April 4, according to the news wire service.

    Vallas supports school choice. Both Johnson and the CTU have made it a target. They have tried killing the Invest in Kids Act and limiting charter schools in the city. The act is supported by 65% of Chicago residents, according to a poll conducted by Echelon Insights and the Illinois Policy Institute.

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      Good bye Chicago, it was nice knowing you.

    2. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

      Chicago is so fucked. You'd have to be totally nuts to live there, or insanely wealthy.

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        I've seen numerous tweets this morning about people getting ready to move out of Chicago. My personal prediction: Chicago will be passed in population by Houston much faster than originally thought.

  21. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Florida votes to extend parental rights.

    https://www.thecentersquare.com/florida/article_3c4e0df4-d324-11ed-a0be-c7fa06b6a0c9.html

    House Bill 1069 passed the state House on March 31 and reinforces parental rights in education and further prohibits classroom instruction on gender identity and sexual orientation, extending the ban from kindergarten through eighth grade.

    The Parental Rights in Education Act was signed into law by Gov. Ron DeSantis in March 2022. The act strengthened the power of parents in how they choose to raise their child and what they want their child exposed to while they are at school.

    1. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

      This guy DeSantis is such a boss. No fucking fear. Just keeps winning

  22. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/DissidentSoaps/status/1643447266009829376?t=uujfcL0aGGEQ9Vwh6yXc5Q&s=19

    Janet Protasiewicz ran a nakedly partisan campaign, promising to deliver Democrat policy victories on abortion, mail-in voting & redistricting.

    Dan Kelly ran on being a fair and impartial jurist. Now that he’s lost, he can stoke moral outrage at the indignity. The GOP way!

    [Link]

    1. Ra's al Gore   2 years ago

      Your son will lose his balls and your daughter will lose her breasts, but at least I didn’t lose my honor.

    2. Mickey Rat   2 years ago

      So she ran as a superlegislator, not as a judge. Fantastic.

  23. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    FOID card suspension suspended.

    https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/article_127d4564-d327-11ed-bdf2-3ff8321cd77c.html

    “As of a few weeks ago, the state has now been enjoined from suspending Firearm Owners ID cards in Illinois from persons merely charged, as opposed to being convicted, of felony charges,” Maag said.

    The ruling from Madison County Associate Judge Donald Foster signed March 10 says the law allowing Illinois State Police to suspend FOID cards “is hereby declared unconstitutional as applied to persons charged with a felony but not yet convicted of a felony.”

  24. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Trump's actual crime.

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/04/05/trumps-great-crime-is-to-have-stood-up-to-the-elites/

    Bragg keeps insisting that no one should be above the law, not even Donald Trump. But this looks like the kind of legal shenanigans that would only be configured for Donald Trump – the foe of the over-credentialed elites.

    More likely, in Bragg’s case, we have a man eager to forgive the crimes of real felons – who amid a historic surge in crime, temporarily downgraded illegal gun possession and robbery from felonies to misdemeanours – inventing a new felony to fit a political foe. As the progressive elites ‘decarcerate’ career criminals, they are criminalising the people who stand up to them. For me, Bragg’s insouciance in the face of real crimes is as much of an outrage as his invention of felonies.

    The Democratic elites have finally gone too far. After the indictment was unsealed, even CNN spent the afternoon and evening queasily admitting it wasn’t all they had hoped for.

    1. Super Scary   2 years ago

      "even CNN spent the afternoon and evening queasily admitting it wasn’t all they had hoped for."

      I am sure they were hoping to open it up and all it would say is "Trump is to show up to the White House at 4:00pm for his execution."

      1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

        It's Maddow opening up his tax report all over again

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          They're starting to make Geraldo's opening of Al Capone's vault look good.

      2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

        It's not all Shrike had *checks past comments* 'hoped' for.

    2. DeAnnP   2 years ago

      The letter of clarification goes on to state that a commercial robbery with a gun will be prosecuted as a felony, whether or not the gun was "operable, loaded, or a realistic imitation."

      "A commercial robbery at knifepoint, or by other weapon that creates a risk of physical harm, will be charged as a felony. In retail thefts that do not involve a risk of physical harm, the Office will continue to assess the charges based on all of the aggravating and mitigating circumstances presented," Bragg's letter said.

      Additionally, according to the clarification letter, people in possession of guns will be prosecuted.

      "Gun possession cases are a key part of our plan for public safety. People walking the streets with guns will be prosecuted and held accountable," the letter said. "The default in gun cases is a felony prosecution. We also will use gun possession cases as an opportunity to trace the sources of illegal guns and build cases against gun traffickers."

      The letter also states that violence against police officers "will not be tolerated."

      https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/manhattan-da-bragg-issues-letter-clarifying-confusion-over-controversial-guidelines/3535100/

      1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

        Is that why Bragg went after a clerk for defending himself against a guy who pulled a gun on him? Is that why Bragg went after and handcuffed to a hospital bed a guy who wrestled away a gun from someone threatening to kill him?

      2. JesseAz   2 years ago

        Why was the letter of clarification needed? To calm public outrage? Now educate yourself on his prosecutorial actions. His main assistance bragged about getting someone who killed another person no jail time since the victim didn't have a family anyways.

        1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

          shreek is having a really tough day today.

  25. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Persecuting lockdown skeptics.

    https://www.spiked-online.com/2023/04/05/is-germany-persecuting-lockdown-sceptics/

    For much of the pandemic, Michael Ballweg was a thorn in the side of Germany’s pro-lockdown establishment. Now, the 48-year-old businessman has become one of Germany’s most famous prisoners.

    I spoke to one of Ballweg’s lawyers, Dr Reinhard Löffler, about his client’s plight. According to Löffler, Ballweg has now been charged with attempted serious fraud (in 9,450 cases), money laundering (in four cases) and attempted tax evasion (relating to an amount of over €500,000). In a worst-case scenario, the charges could result in five years’ jail time.

    There is more than a whiff of politics about this arrest and prosecution. As Löffler, who insists he is not a Querdenker himself, tells me: ‘It stinks.’

    Ballweg, a respected businessman before the pandemic, may well have wanted to use his anti-lockdown fame to make money for himself. But, as Löffler confirms, none of the people who donated money to Querdenken has accused him of fraud.

  26. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

    "At bottom, however, this case is about a single hush payment that was criminal only if it is construed as a campaign contribution," summed up Reason's Jacob Sullum. "That interpretation is, at best, debatable…If the attempt to keep Daniels quiet does not strike you as an offense worthy of 34 felony charges, you are unlikely to change your mind simply because the Trump Organization kept pieces of paper that mischaracterized the reimbursement for that payment."

    Some longtime Trump critics, like former congressman Justin Amash, say Bragg is pushing a flimsy case against the former president.

    You're all forgetting one simple thing:

    ORANGEMANBAD ORANGEMANBAD ORANGEMANBAAAAAADDDDD!!!!!!!11!!1!!!!!! REEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

      I haven't forgotten for a second that Donald Trump is a reprehensible person.

      This case is still weak and the judge should throw it out of court. Instead, Trump, who cannot keep his mouth shut, will probably get himself some jail time for blatant contempt of court. (Because he's a moron with zero self-control.)

      1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

        Who does this uppity orange man think he is just blatantly discussing his political persecution in public?! How dare he, amirite Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq.?

  27. JesseAz   2 years ago

    Of course, it also bears mentioning that none of this would be happening if a former Republican president hadn't paid off a porn star to cover up the fact that he'd cheated on his third wife. If we're going to add up the crazy points, that might still be the wildest part of all this.

    Started out so well before this. Cheating is wilder than a political prosecution?

    1. Ronbback   2 years ago

      I wouldn't be surprised if his wife was all for him getting a porn star, it kept his dirty paws off of her. I know some cultures a wife will actually pay a person to take care of the husband. who the hell knows and its none of our business if we are to assume the left actually meant that when talking about Clintons antics

      1. JesseAz   2 years ago

        Japan is one of the cultures where wives will pack protection for their husband's work trips.

      2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

        Reportedly, Melania is pissed about the Stormy Daniels affair. Admittedly, that could be pissed about the affair itself, or it could be pissed that the affair became public and embarrassed her.

        1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

          Did you get that from "an anonymous source close to Trump" or was it at one of those high-level meetings with Reason "executives" that you're always telling us about?

  28. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    Forget the locals, Trump is obviously more important to get.

    https://nypost.com/2023/04/04/tough-on-trump-bragg-goes-soft-on-actual-public-menaces/

    Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has no problem inflating dubious misdemeanor charges against President Donald Trump into felonies, yet when it comes to real-life career criminals, even violent ones, he does the opposite — reducing felonies to mere misdemeanors.

    That’s what he did last week for Rodney Johnson, 53, who has nearly 90 collars (yes, 90!) on his rap sheet going back to the ’80s.

    The charges include domestic violence after he allegedly threatened to kill his girlfriend, robbery with intent to cause physical injury, extensive narcotics sales and more.

  29. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    What is the actual crime?

    https://nypost.com/2023/04/04/braggs-case-is-a-legal-mess-what-is-he-even-charging-trump-with/

    Yes, the man who has routinely knocked down felony crimes to misdemeanors — or dismissals — actually suggested that he had no alternative but to charge Trump with 34 counts of falsifying business records.

    After all, he insisted, our “business integrity” is at stake. After all, as Bragg intoned with no sense of self-awareness, he has always believed that “the bedrock of the basis for business integrity and a well-functioning business marketplace is accurate record-keeping.”

    Bragg released an indictment that was so vague on key elements that it is unclear what the grand jury thought it was voting on. He vaguely referenced state and federal election laws and later refused to add any details on how they relate to the prosecution.

    1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      Bragg released an indictment that was so vague on key elements that it is unclear what the grand jury thought it was voting on.

      Later that same day, the grand jury also indicted a ham sandwich for 2nd degree murder for its roll in the death of Mama Cass.

      1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

        Wow, that's some overreach considering her death occurred in London.

        1. Ersatz   2 years ago (edited)

          Extradite that glutenous malefactor -you cant hide from Democrat justice… even if you have to open a different bag of sliced bread to get your conviction
          [...unless they have the remains of THAT particular sandwich in a museum somewhere... beside that big mac someone kept for 20 years?]

  30. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/prestonjbyrne/status/1643592023851642881?t=oEUVMGd6_2loBqCZA3Fsxw&s=19

    Hacker News’ response to Bob Lee’s death:

    [Link]

    1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

      "Oakland has half the population of SF but 3x the murder rate"

      Keep going, wise one. What else about Oakland's demographic might be a factor to explain this large discrepancy.

      They are at the point where their gaslighting about topic X is interfering with their gaslighting about topic Y. Gotta tread carefully here!

      1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

        Please, keep going. Please say precisely what you are implying.

        1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago (edited)

          well a quick peak at the census data shows 2 stark outliers not only between those cities, but in comparison to national averages.

          San Fran – significantly higher amount of Asians (34%!), significantly lower amount of blacks (5%) Oakland – significantly higher amount of blacks (22%)

          Gee, I cant figure out why crime rates are drastically different.

          Im sure the above referenced Tweet will be taken down, if it isnt already, just based on the next logical step in his argument (that he is too stupid to initially realize he is making)

          Oh also...did you think this was a gotcha? LOL. This is an observation as obvious as the sky being blue

          1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

            Please expand on your answer. Oakland has more black people and therefore, ???

            1. Chuck P. (The Artist formerly known as CTSP)   2 years ago

              LOL! This is what White Mike losing an argument with Bizarro Mike looks like.

            2. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

              The initial Tweet was the equivalent of saying "how dare you say that X suburb in Chicago is dangerous, just because someone got murdered there! It is infinitely more safe than the inner city! The inner city, in Chicago, has at least 3x more violent crime!" and not realizing the basic point that they are making, while also not at all absolving that the initial crime was a result of absolutely horrible public policy and being soft on crime.

              Seriously, what are you trying to get here? Are you unfamiliar with the demographics involved in violent crime? New to America? We will get you into the accelerated program my mentally challenged brother!

              1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

                Seriously, what are you trying to get here?

                You're supposed to feel very ashamed of your wacism for noticing the statistical reality that black people commit half of the violent crimes in this country despite comprising 13% of the population. It was supposed to be a big gotcha.

    2. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

      Also, maybe Seth Rogan and the other shitlibs who keep normalizing "vandalism, b/e, and robbery are just part of city life! its no big deal! get over it!" will start to see that poo-pooing crime and telling victims its their fault, might have consequences

      1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

        It’s ok until they hit the gated communities.

        1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

          you would think that guy cracking Paul Pelosi in the head would have them concerned with the crime / homelessness / mental illness catastrophe that is san fran.

          1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

            Nah. Now we have Chicago ready to tell San Fran, "hold my Goose Island Lager".

      2. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

        start to see that poo-pooing crime

        Of course pooping on the sidewalk is also a crime the same retards have spent the better part of a decade ignoring and/ or normalizing. So, pun intended?

        Anyway, what you did there? I saw it.

        1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

          so you are smellin' what im steppin' in?

          1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

            Yep.

  31. Derp-o-Matic 6000   2 years ago

    Of course, it also bears mentioning that none of this would be happening if a former Republican president hadn't paid off a porn star to cover up the fact that he'd cheated on his third wife.

    He should have just raped her and then suicided anyone who got too close. That's how respectable politicians handle these things.

    1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

      What Would Clintons Do?

      1. TrickyVic (old school)   2 years ago

        Bill will do anything with a pulse.

    2. Sevo   2 years ago

      "Of course, it also bears mentioning that none of this would be happening if a former Republican president hadn’t paid off a porn star to cover up the fact that he’d cheated on his third wife."

      He'd have been better off getting drunk, loading some sweety into the car, droving off a bridge and leaving her there while he slept it off.
      And being named "Kennedy".

    3. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      Or arranged for her to be found with a stomach full of barbiturates. Although since his name wasn't John Kennedy who knows if that would have worked.

  32. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

    Ah, but alas, the crazy pills. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R–Ga.) organized a protest near where Trump was arraigned on Tuesday and in one interview compared the former president's legal troubles to the persecution of Nelson Mandela and—yes, really—Jesus.

    If the Dotard had ridden a donkey into Manhattan it would have been Christ-like for his Cultists.

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      But he did not.

      1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

        He should have! Donnie is being persecuted!

        It is unfair to our political masters.

        1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

          And, Pluggo, what is your opinion of the charges brought by Bragg yesterday?

          1. Spiritus Mundi   2 years ago

            The Oracle of Dogdick struck out agian. No tax related charges.

            1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago (edited)

              I was hoping for tax fraud, idiot.

              Got some lame “business fraud” instead.

              1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

                LOL! That must've killed your 2-inch boner.

              2. Sevo   2 years ago

                turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
                If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
                turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

              3. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

                The important thing is you spent all day today seething, created 2 new sockpuppets, and outed yourself by replying with the wrong handle 4 times. Maybe you can use your tears as lube for the 8 year old boy tied up in your basement when you're finally able to achieve an erection again.

        2. Sevo   2 years ago

          turd, the ass-clown of the commentariat, lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
          If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
          turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    2. Foo_dd   2 years ago

      maybe at the DEC 4th showing. it will be closer to Christmas.

      1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

        Lol. Replying to your own posts with the sock you outed for the 8,000th time in another thread today. This is absolutely delicious.

    3. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

      It would have to be one hefty donkey.

      1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

        Lol, and Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq. is reduced to the sort of fat jokes that make him cry and sputter when they're made about his butt buddy cytotoxic (dba chemjeff). I'm going to overdose on lefty tears today.

    4. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

      Let me know as soon as any Trump supporter credits him with forestalling the rise of the oceans and healing the planet like you guys did with your chocolate messiah, shreek.

  33. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

    Theo Downes-Le Guin, Ursula's son and literary executor, has agreed to remove those words from future editions of the author's Catwings series, which is aimed at children

    So, like the executors of Tolkien's estate, he's a moron.

  34. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

    He ultimately decided that the revisions would benefit readers his and publisher's bank accounts

    ...since they can now sell new and "improved" editions of the books to a whole new generation of morons.

  35. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/aimeeterese/status/1643622530777751557?t=oarJqBA0MolGc26amsimkQ&s=19

    The sitting VP raised money to bail rapist & pedophile flash mobs out of jail. She visited & praised domestic abuser justly shot by police while violating restraining order, who had warrant out for his arrest & was attempting to kidnap his kids.

    But “nobody” is above the law!

    1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      Technically bailing rapists and pedos out of jail and praising a domestic abuser isn't illegal. Of course, neither is paying a pornstar hush money, yet here we are.

      1. Social Justice is neither   2 years ago (edited)

        If you frame it as aiding terrorists it becomes a whole lot less legal. Kinda like the game Bragg is playing here.

  36. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

    "Did everyone connected to the Trump indictment take crazy pills?"

    You mean like Reason staff since 2016?

  37. Ajsloss   2 years ago

    "posted on Mastodon"

    It's about fucking time we get reference to the goings on over at mastodon. Thanks EB (since ENB still appears to be mystified by mastodon).

    1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

      As I've written about before, I've been checking out Mastodon. It's still quite boring. Popehat is one of the few interesting people there.

      1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

        Popehat is one of the few interesting people there.

        Jesus Christ it must be a hellscape. On a scale of Reason.com to your shitty private Quora forum that you spent a year relentlessly shilling until you shut it down because nobody would talk to you, how boring is it, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq.?

  38. Ra's al Gore   2 years ago

    Leonardo DiCaprio testifies that CCP-linked Malaysian financier, now a fugitive, sent $30 million to Obama during 2012 campaign
    “He told me that he, or he and a group, were going to make a significant contribution to the Democratic Party. … I said 'wow, that’s a lot of money.’”

    https://thepostmillennial.com/leonardo-dicaprio-testifies-that-ccp-linked-malaysian-financier-now-a-fugitive-sent-30-million-to-obama-during-2012-campaign

    Movie star Leonardo DiCaprio took the stand in a federal trial on Monday that seeks to hammer down the details of what appears to be a money-funneling scheme that features a Malaysian financier funneling tens of millions of dollars through a prominent 90s rap artist for the purpose of donating to former President Barack Obama’s 2012 re-election campaign.

    DiCaprio plays into the saga because he was said to have partied with Jho Low, a Malaysian financier who apparently suggested to DiCaprio once during a conversation that he intended to contribute to Obama’s presidential campaign, according to the New York Post.

    1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago (edited)

      Prakazrel “Pras” Michel, founder of The Fugees, has been recruited by Low in an effort to funnel money to Obama’s re-election bid, because foreigners are not allowed to contribute to US campaigns. …

      Prosecutors have claimed that Michel received over $20 million from foreign accounts, which were then passed off to 20 “straw donors from June to November 2012,” according to The Post. These donors were believed to have made the contributions to the Obama campaign in their names so that money could not be tracked back to Low.

      Of course, actual campaign finance violations will be overlooked/ ignored. Especially when they involve the Chocolate Jesus.

      1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

        To be fair, the FEC also passed on the Stormy Daniels matter. Which makes it all the more mystifying that Bragg seems to be building his case for an alternative timeline where the FEC decided to prosecute Trump.

        1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

          To be fair, the FEC also passed on the Stormy Daniels matter.

          That's because, unlike the Obama campaign, which committed numerous campaign finance violations and was fined for doing so, it wasn't a campaign finance violation. Gee, how fucking generous of them not to try to invent charges like Soros' Manhattan sockpuppet, Episarch/Bo Cara Esq.

    2. creech   2 years ago

      Nothing to see here. The FEC is too busy with stopping real foreign intervention in U.S. elections, like the time the Libertarian Party was forced to return the $100 check of a Canadian citizen who wanted to attend the banquet at a Libertarian National Convention. [Resolved by said Canadian getting a U.S. buddy to buy him the ticket under buddy's name.]

      1. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

        And this coming on the heels of James O'Keefe revealing that private donors are basically having their identity stolen to launder money through their accounts in order to skirt donation transparency laws.

  39. NealAppeal   2 years ago

    "occasionally libertarian-adjacent"

    Reason contributors realizing the culture war is coming for them...

    1. Spiritus Mundi   2 years ago

      Reason contributors are the left flank vanguard of the culture war.

      1. Mickey Rat   2 years ago

        That is, the useful idiots who will be going against the wall when the Progs feel secure enough.

  40. Nardz   2 years ago

    https://twitter.com/SteveStuWill/status/1643403747698286593?t=hEZcyRtJfOkpoaCA4C8oCQ&s=19

    Survey: “How many unarmed Black men were killed by police in 2021?”

    -40% of "Very Liberals": 1,000+
    -16% of "Very Conservatives": 1,000+
    -Actual number: 11

    [Link]

    1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

      Curious what the comparison is to police killed by black men. ill look that up later

    2. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago (edited)

      "Very Liberals" are much closer to the actual narrative.

    3. mad.casual   2 years ago

      To be fair, well more than 40% of Very Liberals and 16% of Very Conservatives lack the necessary biological education credentials which a question about "men" and "kill" would require.

  41. Sevo   2 years ago

    "...But here are some people doing what mattered the most to them and simultaneously doing their best to ignore the political wackos—from Bragg and Trump on down—who could have ruined their day..."

    If Boehm didn't have false equivalence, he wouldn't have any at all.
    Hint, TDS-addled shit: Bragg =/= Trump.

  42. Agammamon   2 years ago

    Former federal prosecutor Ken White (formerly well-known on Twitter under the moniker "Popehat"), another outspoken Trump critic, posted on Mastodon that he's "unimpressed with the indictment and the statement of facts."

    *This* is a killer - White got TDS in a bad way and if even he's saying there's nothing there, there's nothing there.

    White, Sullum, Amash - all basically saying 'you don't even have enough to charge a regular dude here, let alone something worth breaking the detente that allows peaceful change of power after an election'.

    1. mad.casual   2 years ago

      I'm sure Sandra will be along any minute now to tell us that the only thing that could slight Biden and bolster Trump among anything but his most rabid fan base would be boots on the ground in Ukraine.

  43. Brian   2 years ago (edited)

    I’m just glad justice will finally be served, and Trump will pay for his crime of… checks notes… inappropriately classifying his payments to his blackmailer.

    1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      I’m just glad justice will finally be served, and Trump will pay for his crime of… checks notes… inappropriately classifying his payments to his blackmailer being Donald Trump.

      FTFY.

      1. Sevo   2 years ago

        ^+1

    2. Ajsloss   2 years ago

      It's quite a kampf, to be sure.

  44. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    For a company that's *checks past articles* imploding, there sure is a lot of reliance on it for journalisming.

    Shorter: Where da Mastadon tweets at?

    1. mad.casual   2 years ago

      The obligatory lift for Popehat, sans links, was amusing.

      1. Ajsloss   2 years ago

        And note that EB is doing the links, not ENB (she's still stuck in mastodon traffic).

        1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

          ENB doesn't actually use Mastodon.

          1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

            No shit, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq. That's the fucking joke since she loudly and proudly did the "I'm moving to Canada Mastodon! shtick when spacemanbad commoditized her precious blue check mark.

    2. Dillinger   2 years ago

      >>Mastadon tweets

      masts?

      1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

        Worse. They are called "toots".

  45. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

    The most expensive judicial election in American history ended Tuesday night with a victory for progressives as Janet Protasiewicz, a liberal Milwaukee County judge, was elected to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The result flips the ideological balance of the seven-member court in a crucial swing state.

    The Californiacation of Wisconsin begins. Buckle up, Wisconsinites!

    1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

      "Fortified elections" coming soon to Wisconsin.

      1. mad.casual   2 years ago

        Why does a controversial Milwaukee judge in the context of show trials and political oppression ring a bell? It seems so familiar for some reason...

  46. Sevo   2 years ago

    "...Contrary to the belief pushed by some nationalist politicians, foreign trade didn't make the United States more vulnerable to supply chain disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic..."

    You want empty containers where they're not needed? Let fools like Newsom 'plan' the economy.
    And, BTW, Newsom has ads running on YT, wherein he claims our current problems are a result of "authoritarian politicians" and he does so without a hint of irony or embarrassment.

  47. Sevo   2 years ago

    "...Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, a Democrat, announced plans for widespread occupational licensing reforms..."

    I've got 'plans' on becoming a billionaire and the J-6 protesters had 'plans' on levitating the capitol.
    Can the campaign promises and get back to us when he's done something.

    1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

      Are they 5-year plans? Because those are the best kinds of plans.

  48. Ronbback   2 years ago

    Still nothing about bud light having a tranny as a mascot on their cans. so disappointed in Reason, smilly face smilly face etc.....

    1. mad.casual   2 years ago (edited)

      Imagine if a devout Christian shot up a school for trans kids and, within the same week, Bud Light put Joel Osteen on their cans and the CMA’s had… hell, I don’t even know what the Christian analogy to dancing trannies is; Mel Brook’s The Spanish Inquisition sketch… on their show.

      Even a good majority of Christians wouldn’t hesitate to cast it into the tone deaf/bad taste/inappropriate/deplorable/blasphemous/disavow-the-shooter nexus.

    2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

      Smiley face? Smelly face? What are you saying?

      1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

        Swapping the l for the e makes it literally unreadable Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq. I can see why you are so confused and appreciate you offering this incisive criticism.

  49. Outlaw Josey Wales   2 years ago (edited)

    Good for a laugh. If Dems had a time machine.

    https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status/1643325697363161088

  50. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    For something different, anyone check out what James O'Keefe has been investigating? I've been reading about it on twitter, and it seems like a certain political party is using "donors" to launder money to them.

    https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/catherinesalgado/2023/03/29/james-okeefe-uncovers-possible-lucrative-money-laundering-scheme-for-dems-n1682689

    “FEC data shows that some senior citizens across the U.S. have been donating thousands of times per year,” O’Keefe began. “Some of these individuals’ names and addresses are attached to over $200,000 in contributions. We went and knocked on a few of their doors to corroborate the data that we received from a group of citizen journalists called Election Watch in Maryland.” The video then showed O’Keefe visiting someone who is listed as donating over $217,000, through 12,000 separate contributions. This money was earmarked for various entities through leftist platform ActBlue over three years’ time. Some of the donations were made with variations of the person’s name and address, O’Keefe stated.

    Finally, there was a man who lives on the outskirts of D.C. listed as donating over 31,000 times to ActBlue. This elderly man said he didn’t think he had donated to ActBlue. “No, that’s not us,” he said, though he admitted his wife might have donated to ActBlue, but “nowhere near” the amount of $230,000. When his wife was questioned, she estimated she donated less than $1,000 yearly, a far cry from the FEC total of $230,000. O’Keefe told the couple, “It appears that someone else may be committing a crime using your address.” The concerned man asked O’Keefe if he could track down “at least some of these individuals,” and O’Keefe responded in his usual cocky style, “That’s what I do, sir.”

    1. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      From O'Keefe Media Group on Twitter:

      https://twitter.com/ClintonRarey/status/1643396078945853441?cxt=HHwWgoCz7dqBws4tAAAA

      I decided to look into @actblue in Austin, TX

      I spoke with Ann who is a 80+ year-old living in a retirement home.

      Over the last 6 years according to @FEC she has made 26,143 donations or 11.9 donations a day for 2,190 days straight on average. Totaling $161,541.70 in donations.

      Either someone is making donations on her behalf, has access to her bank account or @Actblue is using the elderly to launder money to politicians.

      1. mad.casual   2 years ago

        The concerned man asked O’Keefe if he could track down “at least some of these individuals,” and O’Keefe responded in his usual cocky style, “That’s what I do, sir.”
        ...
        Over the last 6 years according to @FEC she has made 26,143 donations or 11.9 donations a day for 2,190 days straight on average. Totaling $161,541.70 in donations.

        Normies: I demand an audit!
        Anti-intellectual Authoritarians who were happy to take the 2000 Election to SCOTUS: OK, 26,143 donations or 11.9 donations a day for 2,190 days straight on average. Totaling $161,541.70 in donations. Satisfied or do want a hand recount?

        1. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

          I've got 20 specific examples of you being an asshole.

          Prove it.

          *looks at paper and counts*

          Yep, 20.

      2. Illocust   2 years ago

        Yeah, this should have been caught by the FEC. It's so obvious no one is donating that often.

        1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

          Yeah, how could this happen? Government's usually so on point.

          1. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

            Government’s usually so on point.

            If the money was being laundered to anyone without a D after their name I'm sure they would be.

      3. A Cynical Asshole   2 years ago

        Either someone is making donations on her behalf, has access to her bank account or @Actblue is using the elderly to launder money to politicians.

        I'm sure the FEC will get right on this. Any second now...

        1. rev-arthur-l-kuckland   2 years ago

          Private company!!!

  51. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

    I think they are having some of the funerals for the murdered Christians, by that tranny psycho.

    Any word from reason yet?

    Simping for the tranny cult: Day 10

    1. mad.casual   2 years ago

      Simping for the tranny cult: Day 10

      We're well past day 10. Reason's been simping for the LGBTQ cult since before The Science! determined that David Bowie and the trannies in dresses at Stonewall were "TQ" and *not* "LGB". Mexicans, weed, and ass sex has been the unofficial Reason credo since the days of W and Ron Paul.

    2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago (edited)

      What is it you want Reason to say? Has it ever occurred to you that they have no insightful commentary to add, so they don't?

      1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

        it doesn't stop you or I from commenting on it, brother

        1. Mike Laursen   2 years ago (edited)

          Well, you are commenting on Reason.

          I’m commenting on you and all the other commenters here who, unreasonably, keep reading meaning into the things Reason doesn't say.

          1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago

            Nah, just extrapolating their motivations based on what they cover, and how they cover it.

            Like anyone with a high school education *should* be able to do

          2. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago (edited)

            It’s exactly like that time when 3 major social media sites with over 4 billion collective users all independently decided to not cover the Hunter Biden laptop story because it was obvious Russian disinformation. Nothing to see here!

      2. rev-arthur-l-kuckland   2 years ago

        They haven't had insightful commentary on anything since ~2014. And even then it's was few and far between

      3. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

        Has it ever occurred to you that they have no insightful commentary to add, so they don’t?

        That explains why they greenlit over 100 articles by Jacob Sullum regarding Trump's handling of classified documents.

        It also fits with the overall pattern of Reason ignoring national news stories about school shootings.

        Thanks for pointing that out, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq. Everything makes perfect sense now.

  52. boroka   2 years ago

    To show that the Brag(g) case is a travesty, all one needs to cite is Pelosi's careless admission:
    "Trump will have to prove he is innocent."
    True justice calls for the prosecution proving he is guilty.

    1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

      Yeah, but it's different for Trump. He falls under the guilty until proven innocent umbrella.

      1. perlmonger   2 years ago

        Guilty until proven Not Trump.

  53. Jerryskids   2 years ago

    Trade restrictions won't work, but lots of countries (including America) are trying them anyway.

    Where are Smoot and Hawley when you need them? They could explain how trade restrictions work.

  54. Dillinger   2 years ago

    I enjoy Marjorie Taylor Greene as Hyperbole Agent.

  55. Dillinger   2 years ago (edited)

    edit: squirrels posted me twice.

    >>"lame" and "dumb" has been deemed too caustic for modern readers' delicate eyes.

    can we gouge their fucking eyes out and leave the books alone?

    1. mad.casual   2 years ago

      can we gouge their fucking eyes out and leave the books alone?

      No, that would be utterly uncultured, crass, and tasteless. Now, hitting them with your car ironically, leaving them crippled and suffering TBI... *chef's kiss*.

  56. TrickyVic (old school)   2 years ago

    ""you are unlikely to change your mind simply because the Trump Organization kept pieces of paper that mischaracterized the reimbursement for that payment."""

    Were they? The payments went to Cohen. A payment of legal services for something your lawyer did does not seem too mischaracterized. It would be different if Trump sent the payments directly to Daniels herself and they said legal services.

  57. Vernon Depner   2 years ago

    I thought libertarianism was all about the wackos hijacking politics.

  58. Sisyphus   2 years ago

    "Of course, it also bears mentioning that none of this would be happening if a former Republican president hadn't paid off a porn star to cover up the fact that he'd cheated on his third wife. If we're going to add up the crazy points, that might still be the wildest part of all this."
    As wild as a sitting president getting a BJ in the oval office?

    1. Dillinger   2 years ago

      as wild as a president and his attorney general brother tag-teaming the movie star?

    2. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

      In the same ballpark.

      Did Boehm say otherwise?

      1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

        Oh, did your selective autism kick in again Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq.? You see, what Sisyphus was pointing out is that Reason ran interference for Clinton and still to this day defends his actions and calls the Republican impeachment a political smear campaign to get an innocent man who just happened to get a blowjob from a young intern in the oval office, while they clutch their pearls in moral panic that Donald Trump cheated on his wife with a porn star before he was president. Does that help, Episiarch/Bo Cara Esq., or do we need to go fetch the crayons again?

    3. rev-arthur-l-kuckland   2 years ago

      But not as wild as a president showering whit his 13 year old daughter

  59. Super Scary   2 years ago

    "Did everyone connected to the Trump indictment take crazy pills? "

    At this point, I think it's in the drinking water.

  60. TrickyVic (old school)   2 years ago

    We keep hearing about what was in the indictment, but have we seen it? Yesterday I posted a link to what I called the indictment however, it was not. It was a Statement of Facts released by the DAs office. Forgive me if I'm wrong but an indictment would include the statutes of the crimes alleged which were not in the Statement of Facts.

  61. mad.casual   2 years ago (edited)

    Of course, it also bears mentioning that none of this would be happening if a former Republican president hadn’t paid off a porn star to cover up the fact that he’d cheated on his third wife. If we’re going to add up the crazy points, that might still be the wildest part of all this.

    Lest we forget that in Team D’s infatuation with where Trump puts his, it’s not always about the D: Hunter Biden was kicked out by his wife for his drug problem. He then proceeded to sleep with his dead brother’s widow. While sleeping with her, he impregnated a stripper. All of which, and more, he denied and denied to the point that he was living under his brother’s name on one of his brother’s properties to avoid paying child support.

    None of it has *anything* at all to do with Burisma, Joe, or an election, directly. All of it, and more (the hookers, the laptop, the denial of the laptop, the leak of the conspiracy to deny the laptop…) is x10^330,000,000 as insane as Trump paid off a porn star whom he slept with.

    Shit, Trump sleeping with a porn star and paying her off doesn't even rise to the level of Ted Kennedy hosting a party for "The Boiler-Room Girls", driving one of them off a bridge and into a channel around midnight, and not telling anyone until 10 a.m. the next morning.

  62. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

    this guy was charged with a hate crime for putting skidmarks on a rainbow flag painted crosswalk

    https://twitter.com/SouthlandPost/status/1642980290472853504

    now do a "MAGA" logo on the crosswalk and see if he gets charged.

    1. Mike Parsons   2 years ago (edited)

      The guy writing MAGA would be the one charged

  63. Mike Laursen   2 years ago

    Tuesday also gave us this wonderful illustration of Twitter But In Real Life, as Trump supporters and critics shouted at each other from behind opposing sets of police barricades.

    And many of them were probably in line together at Starbucks earlier in the day. Which is why our nation is unlikely to plunge into a second civil war over this. We are too into fighting each other on social media while sipping lattes to fight in real life.

    1. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

      That's a nice way of pretending the 2020 Summer of Love that resulted in 3 dozen deaths, hundreds of assaults, dozens of sexual assaults, and 3 billion dollars worth of property damage are just adolescent hijinks between Starbucks runs. It'll only work on people as stupid as yourself, of course, but you're only really trying to fool one person.

  64. XM   2 years ago (edited)

    “Of course, it also bears mentioning that none of this would be happening if a former Republican president hadn’t paid off a porn star to cover up the fact that he’d cheated on his third wife.”

    But if this isn’t a crime, why is this an issue? Do we tell rape victims that they would’ve been spared if they stayed home?

    This is a power grab. This is shit that happens in a banana republic. You cannot try deflect or minimize the seriousness of this injustice by framing it as some typical “prosecutor abuse” and using it as an argument for reform. We already know prosecutors can be crooked. Grand juries can indict ham sandwiches. But what’s happened with Trump is a prolonged and coordinated political prosecution that stretches way back to the Russian probe based on a discredited dossier.

    And it goes beyond Trump, as we’ve seen with BK and the Twitter files. If the government can take out people in power and influence – presidents, doctors, educators, think thank contributors, bloggers, etc – by cooking up whatever charges and definition of “disinformation” they want on a whim, then the nation becomes a banana republic. Every commie state and theocracy suppress dissent or innovation by either labeling them as extremists or heretic to the ideology.

    Reason was sent some sort of warning by the NY DA over the “woodchipper” comment. They were listed as an extremist group by a tax funded organization. Guys like Tucille often advocate for breaking unjust laws. The same hammer that struck Trump can come down on Reason. And it’ll be Republicans who mostly come to their aid. That’s worth noting, since guys like Binion want to dunk on republicans for supposedly not caring about reforms and what’s happening to Trump is some teachable moment for them.

  65. TJJ2000   2 years ago

    Totalitarian Government generate wacko's.
    That's what their end-result is EVERY F'EN TIME!

    The USA was built on LIMITED government so [WE] mobs of wacko's wouldn't destroy it.

  66. apm247   2 years ago

    More like a felony to sell arepas in Venezuela rather than in Colombia.

  67. Pyrrho21C   2 years ago

    It actually makes perfect sense if you understand that the indictment has nothing to do with justice and everything to do with manipulating the political environment in favor of the Democrats for the next general election.

  68. Red Rocks White Privilege   2 years ago

    Nice to see that western elite self-loathing is an evergreen pretense. The irony is that the barbarians probably became more dedicated Christians after conversion than the Romanized populations ever practiced.

  69. Unable2Reason   2 years ago

    The dichotomy between what the Romans were thinking and what the invaders were thinking is also a classic. Global immigration is not about adopting the formerly successful structure of the country you are invading, but transforming it into the shithole you just came from.

  70. ErinS   2 years ago

    The Romans weren't Christians, that should be pretty obvious since they crucified Christ, on this very day.

  71. Hobert Altomonte   2 years ago

    But remember, it's those evil rethuglicans who are obsessed about sex and the kkkulture war!

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Nevada Becomes the 21st State To Strengthen Donor Privacy Protections

Autumn Billings | 6.2.2025 5:30 PM

Harvard International Student With a Private Instagram? You Might Not Get a Visa.

Emma Camp | 6.2.2025 4:57 PM

J.D. Vance Wants a Free Market for Crypto. What About Everything Else?

Eric Boehm | 6.2.2025 4:40 PM

Trump's Attack on the Federalist Society Is a Bad Omen for Originalism

Damon Root | 6.2.2025 3:12 PM

How Palantir Is Expanding the Surveillance State

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 6.2.2025 12:00 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!