Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Inflation

Is Inflation Sneakily Starting To Rise Again?

January's consumer price data indicates another drop in annual inflation, but the past three months might tell a different story.

Eric Boehm | 2.14.2023 11:25 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Inflation balloon Biden administration prices groceries rent gasoline core inflation consumer price index | Illustration: Lex Villena; Gage Skidmore
(Illustration: Lex Villena; Gage Skidmore)

Consumer prices were 6.4 percent higher in January than they had been, on average, a year ago—the seventh straight month in which the annualized inflation rate declined after peaking at 9.1 percent in June.

Beneath the hopeful indicator in the topline figure, however, Tuesday's consumer price report gives off some worrying signals. Instead of continuing on a trajectory towards the Federal Reserve's target of 2 percent annually, inflation seems to be leveling off at a higher level and perhaps even starting to tick back in the other direction.

The annualized rate of 6.4 percent for January reported Tuesday by the Department of Labor is barely lower than the 6.5 percent rate posted in December. That's because prices rose by 0.5 percent during January, tying October for the largest month-to-month increase since inflation peaked in the first half of 2022. If you want to see prices truly fall—as opposed to merely rising less quickly, as the declining annualized rate shows—the month-over-month figures need to dip into negative territory. They are stubbornly refusing to do so.

January's increases were driven by energy costs (up 2 percent after declining in December) and ongoing increases in rent, which climbed another 0.7 percent after a 0.8 percent increase in December. Rent prices are up 7.9 percent over the past year, the largest increase ever.

Grocery prices continued their steady climb as well, jumping another 0.4 percent in January and up by 11.3 percent since this time last year. That's nearly double the overall inflation rate, and almost certainly contributes to the persistent feeling that high inflation isn't yet behind us.

Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm)
(Source: Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm))

Following last week's State of the Union address, where President Joe Biden declared victory over inflation, the White House is likely to spin the new economic figures as further evidence of that success. "Inflation continues to come down," tweeted Ronald Klain, the former White House chief of staff, on Tuesday morning.

The truth is a bit more complicated.

For starters, look at the so-called "core inflation," which filters out the more volatile categories including food and fuel prices. It actually increased to 0.4 percent in January from 0.3 percent in December.

Perhaps even more important is inflation in the "services" sector of the monthly consumer price index report. That's the category that Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said two months ago would be the "most important" to tracking inflation at this stage of the fight, "because wages make up the largest cost in delivering these services."

In other words, inflation in 2021 and early 2022 was driven by rising prices for goods. But rising prices have spilled over into wages, which are harder to reduce than prices for goods. If a bushel of bananas is suddenly worth less than it would have been a few months ago, the price for bananas can more freely fall. Workers have contracts, unions, and laws that control how they are paid.

It's not surprising, but the transition from goods to services inflation is pretty much complete, with goods inflation now below 2%. From here on it's all about services and how sticky their prices prove to be. #CPIinflation pic.twitter.com/QapjVKWV8c

— John Authers (@johnauthers) February 14, 2023

Inflation in the "services" category rang in at 0.5 percent in January and has been persistently climbing throughout the past year.

Finally, even as wages continue to increase in an attempt to keep up with inflation, prices are still rising faster. Combining Tuesday's inflation data with last week's report on worker pay, CNBC concluded that average hourly earnings fell by 0.2 percent during January and are down 1.8 percent over the past year.

"I have a hard time seeing how the implied market breakeven of 2 percent inflation this year makes any sense," Jason Furman, a Harvard economist and former Obama administration economic adviser wrote on Twitter. "Absent a recession inflation below 3 percent is unlikely. And even with one inflation below 3 percent is far from guaranteed."

Inflation is still a major issue for any American who has to run a business or put food on the table, and the problem of rising prices might be getting more difficult to solve as wage inflation persists. A week later, Biden's celebratory declaration that "inflation is coming down" looks premature and out of touch.

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Why Is It So Hard for Congress To End a War?

Eric Boehm is a reporter at Reason.

InflationEconomyBiden AdministrationState of the UnionEconomicsLaborDepartment of LaborFederal Reserve
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (52)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. Chumby   2 years ago

    Pluggo experiences inflation every time he drives by a playground with children present.

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      He rises to the occasion

    2. MadisonEllie   2 years ago (edited)

      Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
      For more detail visit the given link..........>>> http://Www.jobsrevenue.com

  2. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

    Fortunately, it only affects the price of spittin tobbacy

  3. The Ghost of OBL   2 years ago

    inflation never stopped. If you have been in a grocery store or any store on a regular bases over the last 2 1/2 years, you know inflation has gotten worse and worse.

    1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

      Yep. The average trip to the store has doubled in cost. I don't know who can afford to eat steak anymore.

      1. JFree   2 years ago

        The price of steak is not included in inflation. As long as consumers have substitutes (eg ground cow, then pink slime then dogfood) then consumers will make a hedonic decision to switch purchases.

        1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

          You know who buys those expensive steaks? People with EBT cards. It's easy to splurge when it's not your money.

          1. Unicorn Abattoir   2 years ago

            I used to be a grocery cashier. Most people using food stamps clearly needed them. But then there were the people who used them to buy steak and lobsters. And tried to let the lobsters crawl around on the belt.

            1. ravenshrike   2 years ago

              To be fair, the lobster thing is what anyone buying and cooking lobster for the first time does.

              1. xilajid   2 years ago (edited)

                Google pays an hourly wage of $100. My most recent online earnings for a 40-hour work week were $3500. According to my younger brother’s acquaintance, he works cs-02 roughly 30 hours each week and earns an average of $12,265. I’m in awe of how simple things once were.
                .
                .
                See this article for more information————————>>>http://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM

          2. JesseAz   2 years ago

            I have plenty of steak. Many do not. Not sure why you think nobody can afford it.

            But a lot of this stems from the desires of the left to price out basic American staples. From energy to meat. The left is very clear about their desires to end it. They use settle and sue to increase the costs of many American common items. If you are concerned you would think you would criticize this at times.

            1. LeslieJones   2 years ago (edited)

              Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,400 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
              .
              .
              Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.JobsRevenue.Com

      2. Chumby   2 years ago

        Certainly not at a restaurant, the chef might burn the steak.

        1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

          What kind of monster would do that?

        2. sarcasmic   2 years ago (edited)

          Careful. Comments like that give the trolls wood. I’d watch it unless you want them to start humping your leg. Again.

          1. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

            Chumby gave you wood?

            1. Chumby   2 years ago

              I don’t like splinters.

          2. JesseAz   2 years ago

            He is literally referring to you.

            sarcasmic 1 year ago
            Flag Comment Mute User
            Who are you talking to? The voices in your head? Brow beating? Reallh?
            .
            And yeah, if I was cooking broiler when you ordered yours MW, I’d find the fattiest, gristliest piece I could find and burn the shit out of it. Nothing personal, but if you want to ruin meat, you won’t ruin good meat on my watch.

            Posting your self admitting to being an asshole is not trolling. It is laughing at you for your own comments. This wasn't even an isolated comment. This is after admitting to being a shit cook for weeks based on who your customer was.

        3. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

          Witch stake is easiest to burn?

          1. sarcasmic   2 years ago

            The fat, I mean fatty ones.

          2. Wizard4169   2 years ago

            The ones made from well-dried wood, I'd assume.

  4. Sandra (formerly OBL)   2 years ago

    The official hype man for the Biden economy told me there is nothing to complain about. Either everything is great, or if you're not convinced of that, the problems are beyond Biden's control.

    Now that I think of it that was the same tactic he used after the Afghanistan withdrawal.

    #DefendBidenAtAllCosts

  5. Use the Schwartz   2 years ago

    Are we in the "It's happening, but it's a good thing" stage yet?

  6. JFree   2 years ago

    The difficult thing will be to get inflation the last bit down to 2%. That will take time at interest rates high enough to eliminate house price increases and long enough for some pay down of housing related loans.

    My guess is we'll put pressure on to reinflate that bubble and pretend it's not inflation

  7. Longtobefree   2 years ago

    Well, Eric, it is hardly "sneaking" up (even further).
    Is it marching by with a full band, flags, and a rank of baton twirlers.

  8. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

    When do we start printing the Whip Inflation Now buttons?

    1. Don't look at me!   2 years ago

      Too expensive

    2. Commenter_XY   2 years ago

      My God, I remember those. 🙂 I even wore one once in elementary school.

      1. Dillinger   2 years ago

        my mom stuck me in a Kids for ERA! shirt when I was young enough to be a prop & not revolt.

  9. Commenter_XY   2 years ago

    Boehm the Birdbrain....You voted for this, remember?

    That aside, inflation will be here for a while. We have not had an inflationary period in our history that ever took less than 5 years to resolve, Meaning, you returned to the inflation rate where you started. There have been three inflationary periods I can see; post WW1 (5 years), post WW2 (6 years), 1973-83 (11 years).

    This is now year 3 of inflation (2021, 2022, 2023 is year 3). We have at least 2 more years after this. There is no sneaky anything here. There is history, and Boehm the Birdbrain don't know shit about history.

    Do better.

  10. Jerryskids   2 years ago

    Where are these numbers coming from? The government? Oh, then they're totally reliable numbers, I'm sure! It's not like the government would ever lie about how bad things are.

  11. TJJ2000   2 years ago

    Inflation is just TAX in disguise... Did anyone really believe all that COVID money was picked off a magical money tree?

    1. Its_Not_Inevitable   2 years ago

      Yes, many did. And they believe goods and services fall off magical goods and services trees.

    2. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      AOC?

  12. Diane Reynolds (Paul.)   2 years ago

    I believe that esteemed economist Paulie Krugnuts just declared that inflation is back on the rise, but it doesn't matter.

    As a good friend of mine noted, given his record, he's probably wrong on either the former or the latter, but he's not sure which.

    1. Earth-based Human Skeptic   2 years ago

      Given his record, he can toggle between the two, depending on the NYT narrative of the day.

  13. Mother's Lament   2 years ago

    Where's Buttplug? I want to see how he'll spin this.

    1. Dillinger   2 years ago

      blah blah fatass donnie blah blah

  14. I, Woodchipper   2 years ago

    Nothing can stop what's coming.

    Various fits and starts, minor upticks and downticks notwithstanding.

    They will never be able to undo the inflation that is coming.

  15. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

    Glad to see the new Republican-led House jump all over the inflation problem first thing this term.

    Wait, that was Hunter Bidens Penis they jumped on. They haven't addressed inflation yet.

    1. JesseAz   2 years ago

      They are asking for spending cuts to be attached to the debt limit. They are already addressing inflation dumbass.

      1. Wizard4169   2 years ago

        Yeah, generic "cuts". They don't seem to have anything resembling a coherent idea of just what they're going to cut. Since they've put all the biggest spending categories off the table, I'd really love to hear how they're going to achieve any real, significant cuts.

        1. Truthfulness   2 years ago

          You don't make a big cutting/spending plan overnight. Republicans are still headed at the right direction with inflation, unlike Democrats.

    2. InsaneTrollLogic   2 years ago

      Damn, you're an idiot. You do realize the Democratic Congresses that preceded this current one? You know, the ones that made the money printer go "brrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr". Last time we had inflation is bad, it took over a decade to control it by the Fed.

      BTW, you do have a very odd phallic obsession.

    3. Sevo   2 years ago

      turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
      If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
      turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

  16. Earnesto Concernada   2 years ago

    You people just don't understand macroeconomics. It's not like your household budget.

    Money is simply a medium of exchange. When we spend money, that money circulates through the economy, generating more wealth. Conversely, when you stop spending money, the money sits idle, which generates negative wealth.

    Now, there isn't a finite amount of money. There's an infinite amount of money, of which the Fed has allowed only a small portion to become finite. So the current amount of money is less than the total amount of money in the future. Given inflation, more of the future money becomes current money so what was current money is previous money, and the current money is more of what was previously future money.

    Inflation can go arbitrarily high because our government can make arbitrarily infinite money finite by printing and spending it. This makes future money current money, and current money previous money. In fact, if you try to stop the process by reducing spending or printing of money, current money becomes future money and previous money becomes current money. At that point, our wealth shrinks. Therefore, we should stay the course, printing and spending money. QED.

    Read a book, you simplistic losers.

    1. Sarah Palin's Buttplug 2   2 years ago

      Read a book

      Let me guess.

      You read 'Web of Debt' by that dietician lady turned pop economist.

      1. Sevo   2 years ago

        turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
        If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
        turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.

    2. Use the Schwartz   2 years ago

      "Read a book, you simplistic losers."

      Does The Hobbit count?

    3. TJJ2000   2 years ago

      The legal tender (medium of exchange) of practically the entire population. Paying people to work for fake money doesn't "generate more wealth" because people aren't THAT F'EN STUPID. When they realize their labors won't pay for anything in return they get TICKED OFF and BROKE.

      Speaking of reading a book. Maybe you can remind us all again how many ENTIRE nations fell due to hyper-inflation due to (what a load of BS) your "printing wealth" dumbest f*cken idea I've ever heard......

      1. Sevo   2 years ago

        This is an MMT ignoramus; not worth the time.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

Trump's Tariffs and Immigration Policies Destroy Thousands of Acres of Tomato Crops in Florida

Autumn Billings | 5.12.2025 5:14 PM

Defenders of Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order Offer an Implausible Take on a 127-Year-Old Precedent

Jacob Sullum | 5.12.2025 4:52 PM

Why DOGE Failed

Eric Boehm | 5.12.2025 3:20 PM

The Indian-Pakistani Ceasefire Is What U.S. Diplomacy Should Look Like

Matthew Petti | 5.12.2025 12:11 PM

Republicans Want To Redefine Obscenity

Elizabeth Nolan Brown | 5.12.2025 11:45 AM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!