Louisiana Sheriffs' Offices Have Been Destroying Public Records Without Permission
"Comprehensive and accurate records are critical if patterns and causes of harm are going to be identified and corrected," said an attorney representing Louisiana inmates.

Almost half of Louisiana's sheriffs' offices are breaking state public records law, according to a new investigation from ProPublica and Verite, a New Orleans–based nonprofit newsroom. Lacking formal document retention policies, as required by state law, Louisiana sheriff's offices have been accused of destroying public records, including documents showing evidence of police misconduct.
According to state law, Louisiana requires that all sheriffs' offices—as well as other state agencies—write a formal public records retention policy and submit it for state approval. The law also requires these agencies to seek permission to destroy public records from the state archivist.
However, documents provided to ProPublica and Verite show that 30 out of the state's 64 sheriffs' offices have not sought approval for their policy, have allowed their policy to expire, or have a policy that only applies to a small percentage of public records. Further, nearly two-thirds of sheriffs' offices have reportedly failed to seek permission to destroy public records.
As a result of this practice, individuals seeking information on alleged police misconduct often find it difficult to obtain needed documentation due to unclear public records policies. Further, some Louisiana sheriffs' offices have even been accused of deliberately destroying public records that contain evidence of police abuse. For example, in the case of Eric Parsa, an autistic teenager who was killed in 2020 when Jefferson Parish police officers placed the boy in a prolonged chokehold, Parsa's family claimed in a 2021 lawsuit that police illegally destroyed accused officers' disciplinary records. According to ProPublica, a judge later ruled that the Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office "should have known to preserve the disciplinary and training records of deputies involved in the case."
However, Louisiana sheriffs' offices appear to be brazenly confident in their practice of destroying public records—even as it conflicts with state law. According to ProPublica, the Louisiana Sheriff's Association interprets state law as allowing individual offices to keep records for a minimum of three years in lieu of a more detailed, formal policy. "We believe that Sheriffs utilizing the statutory alternative of a three year minimum retention period in the absence of a more formal retention policy are not acting unlawfully," Michael Ranatza, executive director of the Louisiana Sheriffs' Association, told ProPublica.
When sheriffs' offices fail to create a public document retention policy—and follow it—the consequences can be devastating. "Comprehensive and accurate records are critical if patterns and causes of harm are going to be identified and corrected, for example when looking at staff deployment or employee discipline," Elizabeth Cumming, an attorney representing inmates held at the Orleans Justice Center, told ProPublica. "Without a robust practice of record generation, maintenance, review and assessment, our clients will continue to experience preventable violations of their rights."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Public records retention law shredded by sheriffs.
And the most that will happen to the guilty parties is a fine how do you do!
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
This is just an extension of the IRS Lois Lerner method of record management.
Maybe Reason can bayou a ticket to somewhere other than Louisiana for stories.
You could get swamped in all these stories.
Parish the thought…
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,100 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link—————————————>>> http://Www.SmartJob1.Com
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM
You guys are killing me. I’ve never really paid attention to this site but will now just for the punning!
Or should I say “just for the pun of it”
Now now, Reason only does stories out of Louisiana when they get a scoop on breaking news, or when there’s slim pickings. Either new or lean, they’re a Reasonable Purchase.
The records retention suggestion from the legislature conflicts with the fifth amendment.
Qualified immunity.
FYTW.
Need more?
Records retention does not conflict with 5A, especially when it's a government office. In fact, for mere commoners, deliberately destroying documents to hide evidence can be a criminal offense.
Someone needs their sarcasmometer checked.
I have an old-school analog sarcometer. Sometimes it gets stuck.
Never write a letter and never throw one away. If you foolishly write one, make sure there are no other copies before you destroy it.
What's that you say? '...our clients will continue to experience preventable violations of their rights....' Better you than me love.
That's going too far. There are situations where putting things in writing can help you later.
Like grocery shopping.
Here's what I don't get.
I work at a university. If our student records system erroneously put down a C grade instead of a B on a transcript, we would be getting calls from the Governor's office, and would be required to create a monitoring and audit program to see that it never happens again, along with monthly reports. Cops can have faulty records that result in armed home invasions of innocent people, false arrests on warrants that have expired, etc. FAR more serious and damaging consequences. And cops say "here, have this piece of dogshit because that's as close as you will ever get to an apology, never mind any consideration of change". I guess if none of the legislators who create these laws ever care about enforcing them, then it doesn't matter if they comply or not.
If you're in a position of authority in state or local government, the cops are going to make sure they have dirt on you to keep you in line.
Maybe. Assuming they don't lose the file. Maybe they are perfectly capable of maintaining the ones they want to maintain.
To be sure, they won't destroy arrest and conviction records.
If our student records system erroneously put down a C grade instead of a B on a transcript, we would be getting calls from the Governor’s office, and would be required to create a monitoring and audit program to see that it never happens again, along with monthly reports.
Unless there's some completely missing context this isn't even remotely believable. Grading disputes happen and get resolved all the time without anyone outside the class knowing. Typographical or 'erroneously reported' errors being among the most trivial.
See "hyperbole". Even so, an error (not a dispute--read closely) would be considered a Big Deal and we would be working to diagnose and correct it before it happens again. LEOs, not so much.
However, documents provided to ProPublica and Verite show that 30 out of the state's 64 sheriffs' offices have not sought approval for their policy, have allowed their policy to expire, or have a policy that only applies to a small percentage of public records. Further, nearly two-thirds of sheriffs' offices have reportedly failed to seek permission to destroy public records.
Not widespread enough document destruction to significantly alter the outcome you don't yet have standing to bring suit over anyway. Come back when you've got something actionable. At which point, it will be moot. GFY, Next.
If you think that's bad wait till you hear what dems do with voter ballots
That's enough. Roadblock that god-forsaken state, arrest everyone carrying a badge on G.P. Copy everything everywhere, send the legislature to the desert to dry out for a while, drug test the governor and anybody that looks like the governor. Just have that whole cocksucking sinkhole declared an insane asylum.
And that is what you get when you write a law with no explicit penalties, where the State Attorney General's office would have to prosecute (when said office has to work with these Sheriffs constantly).
Outside of a major public outcry that the AG can't ignore, nobody is ever going to go to court over this.
The public has to pay for defense for the sheriffs, even though it's against their own self- interest. The offense needs to come up with another source of funding.
For criminal sanctions, yes. But the legislature's job is to write laws and allocate budgets. I'm sure that a proviso cutting budgets by 3% for every month the plan is late would get someone's attention.
I completely agree that any law without penalties is useless. If something is needed badly enough to make it a law, said law needs to specifically answer the question "Or else what?"
Did they not properly use BleachBit and smash the devices with hammers? That is of course the Reason/Fed approved method of destroying government documents without consequence.
I was just thinking the same thing.
I am making $162/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply
COPY AND OPEN THIS SITE________ http://Www.Smartcash1.com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.APPRICHS.com