Chicago Public Schools Will Call Child Services if You're Late To Pick Up Your Kids From School
"My daughter rushed to the car and she's like, 'mommy DCFS came to the school, and the lady made it sound like we weren't going to come home with you today,'" Tresa Razaaq told a local news station.

A Chicago mom who was late to pick up her children from school a few times last year got a nasty surprise: a letter informing her she was under investigation by the Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS). While this may seem like an overreaction, parents can come under government scrutiny for minor mistakes—and it can be the result of draconian school policies.
Last September, Tresa Razaaq, a single mother of four, received a letter from the Illinois DCFS after she was late to pick up two of her children from school several times. While Razaaq freely admits she was late to pick up her children, it wasn't a common occurrence—on Tuesday, she told Chicago's NBC 5 that she was late "maybe four times." However, this didn't stop her children's school from involving the DCFS, which sent her a letter informing her that she was being investigated for child neglect.
"My daughter rushed to the car and she's like, 'mommy DCFS came to the school, and the lady made it sound like we weren't going to come home with you today,'" Razaaq told NBC 5.
The investigation started because Chicago Public Schools has a strict "stranded student" policy, which requires school administrators to contact DCFS if the child has not been picked up by 4:30 p.m. and a parent or guardian does not pick up after two phone calls.
"It's more than aggressive, it's harmful," Cathy Dale, a local school council representative, told NBC 5.
Parents can be investigated by child protective services for late school pickups—often because school policy requires it. In Washington, D.C., for example, the public school handbook requires that school employees call the D.C. Child and Family Services Agency to take custody of a child if his parent doesn't pick him up by 4:30 p.m. In 2021, another Chicago mother was investigated for neglect after she was a mere seven minutes late to pick her son up from school—even though she claimed the school itself caused the late pickup by publishing a confusing bus schedule.
Most school districts don't seem to have such a strict policy. However, public school teachers are still bound by mandatory reporting laws that require them to report any suspected cases of neglect and abuse, meaning that plenty of parents still have child protective services investigations initiated by school employees. The Department of Health and Human Services estimates that 21 percent of such reports came from school personnel. But mandatory reporting laws might not actually be keeping kids safer. According to an investigation by NBC News and ProPublica this year, "while the unintended and costly consequences [of expanded mandatory reporting laws] are clear, there's no proof that the reforms have prevented the most serious abuse cases….Instead, data and child welfare experts suggest the changes may have done the opposite."
According to a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, as many as one in three children in the nation's 20 most populous counties are expected to be the subject of a child protective services investigation by the time they turn 18. In Cook County, Illinois—where Chicago is located—around 40 percent of children were the subject of an investigation. For black children, the number rises to nearly 60 percent—the second-highest rate among the 20 counties studied.
"Opening up a neglect case only makes sense if a kid is repeatedly stranded," Lenore Skenazy argued for Reason about a similar case in 2021. Calling child protective services over a slightly late pickup, she wrote, is "the moral equivalent of calling child services over a hangnail."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Chicago kids do not need DCFS. Air support, maybe.
% of Pedos emplooyed at DCFS? I would bet it is a welcome employer for groomers.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.NETPAYFAST.COM
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.APPRICHS.com
Illinois DCFS is fucking scary. I wouldn't trust them with a gerbil, much less a child.
https://www.thecentersquare.com/illinois/audit-of-illinois-dcfs-finds-multiple-failures/article_2d6c56b4-d227-11ec-ac54-5b95c8e78e90.html
In the latest report on the department’s plan to address investigator caseloads, Smith reported a statewide rolling vacancy percentage of 21%, with a goal of reducing it to 6% or less. The agency pointed to the pandemic and a labor crisis, coupled with rising child abuse investigations as obstacles to meeting that goal.
And Amendment 1 will make it worse.
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/dcfs-failures-to-protect-children-could-get-worse-under-amendment-1/
More than 2,129 children died under the watch of the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services during the past two decades, including 122 kids in a recent year.
The constitutional amendment would give union leaders the permanent ability to override state laws through collective bargaining agreements – including provisions in the Children and Family Services Act.
And to make Buttplug and Jeffy proud:
Child pornography charges were filed against DCFS information technology worker Brett Wexstten in May. A government employer should know if there is a child porn conviction on his record.
Chicago Public Schools isn't much better.
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/reports/trapped-in-chicagos-worst-schools-education-outcomes-in-chicagos-lowest-performing-public-schools/
A majority of students attending the lowest 10 percent of elementary schools and high schools in Chicago don’t have basic competence in reading, science and math. They’re significantly behind their peers in almost every respect. And success in school is a direct link to success later in life with more steady employment, greater wages and higher self-confidence.
Many of them sit half empty.
https://wirepoints.org/more-failure-at-chicago-public-schools-about-one-third-of-traditional-schools-are-half-empty-or-worse-wirepoints/
Of CPS’ 478 stand-alone “traditional” or non-charter, non-contract schools, one third of them, 150, are less than half-full, according to CPS. The 20 most-empty CPS schools are only 5 to 25 percent full – most with depressing educational outcomes, which we detail below.
And there's enough there like Jeffy and Buttplug that should scare the crap out of parents.
https://www.illinoispolicy.org/report-500-sexual-misconduct-complaints-against-chicago-public-school-employees/
One investigation found a former Junior ROTC staff member had sex with a 16-year-old high school student for a year. When he learned there was an investigation, the staff member threatened to kill the girl and her family if she cooperated with investigators.
I will say this, though:
While Razaaq freely admits she was late to pick up her children, it wasn't a common occurrence—on Tuesday, she told Chicago's NBC 5 that she was late "maybe four times."
That's her own self-serving statement and a good journalist would try to confirm this somehow. If she's constantly late and not answering her phone, that's different than being slightly late once.
That said, this policy is stupid and there's no reason to trust Cook County schools with anything. They're absolutely terrible and have shown to be the enemies of children and parents.
Chicago Public Schools. There's a myriad of districts in Cook County with some being k-12 (like CPS), some are k-8 only, and some are 9-12 only. School districts in Illinois can be very independent of each other and do cross county lines.
It's also missing a critical piece of information. How late was she and how big is the grace period?
To give two extremes, if she had between 3 and 4:30 and rolled up just shy of 7:00, then even once is terrible unless there's a car wreck or something. However, if she had between 4:00 and 4:30 and got into the parking lot at 4:35, then that's absurd.
IDK, I’m split. I agree that DCFS is absurd either way, but as far as the rest of it goes, everyone is assholes.
I don’t know about the specific story for Razaaq, but for the other story about Dodson, last bell is at 3:45. Pickup is at 4:00. 4:30 rolls around and your kid’s still there, you’re late. You show up at 4:37 to pick up your kid, you aren’t, despite Reason’s assertion, 7 min. late, you’re 37 min. late. And if you didn’t answer your phone between 4:00 and arrival, you’re disrespectfully 37 min. late. Once, maybe twice, OK, you’re an asshole, but not enough of an asshole that necessitates interrupting my other duties further but, after that, you’re really starting to become a standard disruption of normal/expected function.
Don’t want your teachers demanding more pay, unionizing, and amending the state constitution? Show up at 4:00 to pick them up or send them to a private school where they’ll just charge you $100/hr. or whatever for every 15 min. beginning on the minute.
They’d fire a bus driver for showing up at 4:37. If they overlooked the kid and closed and locked the school at 4:30 and the Mom showed up at 4:37 you can be sure there’d be hell to pay. “I will never live for the sake of another man, nor ask another man to live for mine.” means showing up on time or, at least, communicating to make amends and alternative arrangements when you can’t.
Yeah, I will bet my Reason subscription that "maybe four times" is actually at least once a week.
I do agree that threatening to take her kids away is insane. But how about making her wash the principal's Lexus?
Right. There’s probably got to be some moderate level of punishment or negative incentive. If her kids are too young to walk home on their own, she needs to pay whoever is watching them for the cost of babysitting. They make their own plans around the idea that parents aren’t just dumping the kids on them, they might have their own children they need to tend to.
Making money online is more than $15k just by doing simple work from home. I received $18376 last month. It's an easy and simple job to do and its earnings are much better than regular office jobs and even a little child can do this and earn money. Everybody must try this job by just use the info on this page..... https://work7.pages.dev/
Is the policy stupid?
What do you want the school to do of they have kids there and nobody has picked them up?
Just leave them by themselves? They be sued into oblivion if anything happened.
Get your kids out of the public schools. It's that simple.
That might not be an option for much longer.
Growing up, we used to walk or bicycle the approximately 2 miles between our house and the elementary school.
Then, suddenly one year, the staff refused to let us leave without a parent or guardian anymore. Turns out they had some sort of after school daycare program they had just started and the new policy meant we were put in that and a bill would be sent to our parents.
That did not last long. Luckily, it's easier to enact change at a private school.
The schools want your children. That’s all there is to it.
Good for them. 30 minute grace period is more than enough time for adults to figure out how to pick up their kids or have a working number where an adult can be reached; of course they should call child protection services - they are trained to deal with kids. You'd have to be an idiot to let 500 or 1,000 parents run (ignore) the pickup process. Letting the inmates run the asylum is not a option.
"they are trained to deal with kids"
That's debatable.
What services do you call when the Chicago School System as a whole has a sexual assault problem with students?
Whatever you do, do not protest at the school board meetings, you terrorist.
If you mean during a sexual assault, you should call the cops and then be outraged when they say they'll be there in the next 30 min. and then show up 37 min. later. But not the first time, maybe after four times.
It's public school, if the parents haven't shown up by 4:30 after two phone calls, meaning they're over half an hour late, then just turn the kids out on the Chicago street. Wouldn't that satisfy everyone involved?
Depends a bit on the age. Early grade school there should be some sort of plan for the kids, though in-person pick-up seems a bit extreme if we're talking neighborhood schools and not some citywide placement program.
Two phone calls to the parent, one phone call to Uber. Then it's no longer your problem.
Oddly for a Democrat-run area staffed by woksters, this seems to be a classic case of the "systemic racism" that they themselves religiously devote their lives to stamp out. I guess it's OK when you do it yourself.
I noticed that.
I suppose the response is "see, if even enlightened folks like us have internalized systemic racism, imagine how bad it must be in, like, Texas or whatever."
Weird huh? All those struggle sessions based on Robin d'Angelo and Henry Rogers ("Ibram X Kendi") and they still have no idea.
Thanks for making it so easy to know who to place on Ignore.
Another blessing of Commie-Education...
Wow the list just keeps growing...
Commie is sooo COOOOOLLLL.... /s
Being on time is white supremacy.
I learned that from the Smithsonian!*
*This is actually true, and if you forgot or never saw it, google "white culture poster Smithsonian".
If you willingly still live in Chicago and didn't have the brains to leave after 2020 it's on you.
Amen.
Perhaps voting for the same party for a century has some negative impacts here and there?
4:30 is pretty damned late. There really isn't any good excuse for being past that time more than once in a given year, and you would absolutely have to call and explain why you were running late.
Sounds reasonable to me. School ends at the same time every day, for a parent to be repeatedly late is not acceptable. Picking up your kids is a priority, if you can't do that how else are you deprioritizing your childrens welfare?
how else are you deprioritizing your childrens welfare?
By making babies without a husband.
Leizi has a point. Not a good one, but a point nonetheless. It calls for a counterpoint.
Chicago parents of normal to above normal intellegence of any color should explain to their child (middle or high school, not elementary) that they will be late for the next several days as a protest. Thereby force referrals to CPS to be demonstrably “selective”, or alternatively, to produce a number of referrals that paralyzes the system.
Oh, but you say, what of the poor abused children? Most middle- and high-schoolers have enough innate rebellion in them to enjoy the notion of “putting it to the man”. A few might in fact get taken into the tender caress of CPS, but this happenstance, in view of the numbers hopefully involved, will (1) be short-lived, and (2) may provide the “child” with the opportunity for a large monetary settlement (think college fund) from CPS if not individual CPS administrators, and (3) [most importantly] will provide the youngsters with a real-life civics lesson that should teach them about how much trust agents of the government deserve for the rest of their lives!
In closing the children should be instructed by their parents about the notion of protest, and advised - no, strictly commanded - to answer no questions posed by police or CPS (or school officials) other than name and address. Play stupid law games -> win stupid prizes. "January Sixth insurrectionists" would not be in jail if there had literally been several million rather than several hundred of them. So many stupid laws could be eliminated if there were adequate number of the people who oppose them or find them unbearably stupid were willing to commit "civil disobedience".
So they will be late. What do you expect the schools to do with the kids? Who pays for that?
Teachers aren't babysitters. Everyone can have an emergency. But repeatedly?
Now it's a habit.
IMHO, this having to pick a child up from school, or even having to be at the bus stop, is not good for the kids. I walked to and from elementary school and I lived over a mile away at the time. Have them learn some self-reliance.
IMHO, DCF, DCFS, or whatever letters you want to use should have no business involving themselves without a judge issued warrant. Then be held accountable if reasons for their interference are false along with the party who called them. The one exception would be verifiable life or death situations which then the police would call for the warrant afterwards.
I am making a good salary from home $6580-$7065/week , which is amazing under a year ago I was jobless in a horrible economy. I thank God every day I was blessed with these instructions and now it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with Everyone,
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
Here is I started.……......>> http://WWW.SALARYBEZ.COM