Illinois City Agrees To Stop Fining People for Resisting Warrantless Home Inspections
Zion’s attempts to push out unwanted renters collides with Fourth Amendment protections.

It's a victory for the privacy of landlords and renters in Zion, Illinois, as the city has formally agreed to change its rental inspection laws to comply with Fourth Amendment protections against warrantless searches.
The mayor and City Council of Zion, population just under 25,000, passed a rental inspection ordinance in 2015 that required all property owners to apply for certification for any residences they wanted to lease. Part of the requirement to get a rental certificate was to allow any rental unit to be inspected by city officials every year. If a landlord fails to follow the rules, they can be fined $750 per day until they comply.
Property owner Josefina Lozano had her rental units approved by the city's program. But when it came time for the city to inspect her properties in 2018, a prerequisite for an official rental certificate, the tenants of one of her units, Robert and Dorice Pierce, refused to cooperate and wouldn't allow city staff into their home. As a result, that particular unit wasn't certified. When the city attempted to force compliance in 2019, Lozano and the Pierces turned to the Institute for Justice. They sued, arguing that the program violated their Fourth Amendment rights, which protect them from unwarranted government searches.
"We have always sent letters to the city denying them access and it hasn't been a problem until this year," Dorice Pierce told Chicago's ABC affiliate in 2019. "If you want to come in here, go get a search warrant because I am not just going to let you in because you say you want to come in."
According to coverage of Zion's city leadership from the Chicago Tribune in 2017, the inspection racket was part of a concerted effort by former Mayor Al Hill to drive renters out of town:
"Zion has 3.5 percent the population of Lake County," Hill said as the council deliberated the inspection fees at the time. "We have 38 percent of the Section 8 vouchers that Lake County gives out. And it's an issue that we have to address. … We have to get our arms around all the rest of the issues that are associated with too many rental units and too much Section 8 rental units."
Complaints about too many "Section 8" houses are typically a stand-in for complaints about having too many poor people, some of whom get into trouble with the law. The Tribune story isn't just about the rental inspection program (which also charges a biennial $75 per-unit fee) but also a "crime-free" housing ordinance that resulted in letters being sent to the owners of properties where people had been victims of crimes, warning the owners that the properties could be deemed a nuisance and the residents evicted.
Zion is not the only city to implement an abusive "crime-free" program to try to drive out unwanted renters, regardless of whether they've done anything wrong. Reason's Christian Britschgi took note recently of the town of Hesperia, California, settling with the Department of Justice over abuses caused by their program.
In any event, it looks like some of Zion's abuse of landlords and renters will end. The city folded after Lozano and the Pierces sued, amending the law in April 2022 to change it so that the city can't fine property owners if they or their tenants refuse an inspection. The city suggested it would seek administrative warrants to conduct rental inspections if needed.
Last week, the plaintiffs and the Institute for Justice secured an additional victory: Judge John F. Kness of the U.S. District Court for the North District of Illinois Eastern Division signed a consent decree requiring the city to dismiss any fees or fines assessed because a tenant refused to consent to a rental inspection. The order also says the city cannot require advanced consent for inspections as a condition of approving rental certification applications.
"This consent decree is a massive victory for the basic privacy rights and property rights of renters and landlords in Zion," said I.J. Attorney Rob Peccola in a prepared statement. "If the government wants to pry into your personal spaces, revealing intimate details about your life, it should have to get a warrant."
It may seem like a small win for privacy, particularly if you own your home and don't have to rent. Still, these inspection programs are aggressive and intrusive ways that city officials go after "undesirables," many of whom have not broken the law and are simply lower income. If Zion leaders want Section 8 tenants to make up a smaller proportion of the town's residents, the legal and moral way to do that is to adopt policies that grow the town's economy.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Just curious; has anyone researched to see if 'Section 8' was deliberate or coincidental?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I'm now creating over $35,200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,200 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link------------------------------------>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit.. ???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
https://WWW.WORKSCLICK.COM
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
Dude, you didn't mention that landlords love 'Section 8' because they know they're getting paid, since the check comes from the government, not the tenant. Also, neighbors tend not to like 'Section 8' because the people on it are generally alcoholics and drug addicts who probably wouldn't live there if not for government handouts.
Writing that all off as not liking poor people is disingenuous.
"Dude, you didn’t mention that landlords love ‘Section 8’ because they know they’re getting paid, since the check comes from the government, not the tenant."
Not necessarily. Where I used to live (small city in N Cali), the County housing authority, in most cases, paid most of the rent, but not all of it. Also, a very large percentage of Section 8 clients were low-income seniors, not "alcoholics" or "drug addicts."
Then I guess we've had different experiences.
Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ… Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ… Mᴀᴋᴇ $80 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $13000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ… Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ:) GOOD LUCK.:)
.
.
See this article for more information————————>>>GOOGLE WORK
So they covered your whole monthly rent prior to you occupancy of the refrigerator box?
"Then I guess we’ve had different experiences."
Yeah. That does happen.
Naah. Sarc is just a lefty scum who's full of shit.
Different from mine, too. There is a difference between low income seniors and welfare who won't work.
I've heard from some landlords that don't particularly care for it, either. Guaranteed rent only goes so far if the renter trashes the place. My favorite story was about a tenant who covered the floor with cut up cardboard boxes and let their dog crap all over the place. When it got hard to walk, the tenant just put down another layer of cardboard. When they finally left, the landlord had to clean out what he described as "poop lasagna".
When I was in high school I had to clean up seven pick up loads of dog shit out of one of my parent’s rentals. It was all in the basement, so I had the added pleasure of the fumes from a confined space along with the exercise of dragging it all upstairs.
If that guy hadn’t skipped the state I would have hunted him down and beaten him half to death.
Regardless of local laws, it's hard to get a S-8 tenant out.
Don't do business with the gov't; they have the guns.
Home earnings allow all people to paint on-line and acquire weekly bills to financial institutions. Earn over $500 each day and get payouts each week instantly to account for financial institutions. (bwj-03) My remaining month of earnings was $30,390 and all I do is paint for as much as four hours an afternoon on my computer. Easy paintings and constant earnings are exquisite with this job.
More information→→→→→ https://WWW.DAILYPRO7.COM
A lot of landlords hate government programs. My parents had terrible experience with these programs, and this is why they won’t be involved with these agencies anymore, and why I never started. The problem being that the funding agencies don’t pay up if the tenant destroys the property, and the tenants are obviously broke.
You would know that if you were a landlord, as opposed to living in a refrigerator box.
"A lot of landlords hate government programs."
Where I used to live, many of the owners of apartment complexes, and not "uppity ones," ones actually designed for lower- to lower-middle class renters, refused to deal with Section 8 housing programs. They had no problem finding tenants.
Fake news. Zion is in a heavily Democratic area, and would not stoop so low.
Zion is in a heavily Democratic area, and would stoop so low.
Fixed it for you.
It may seem like a small win for privacy, particularly if you own your home and don't have to rent.
It may also seem like a small win for privacy if you've seen or are generally aware of the stringency, or lack thereof, with which warrants can be issued and executed...
even against a former President by the FBI.
Rubber stamps don’t cost much.
It's true that judges often rubber-stamp warrants, but that only makes me more suspicious of authorities who can't even be arsed to get a rubber stamp.
Town inspection of rental units is now considered 'unreasonable'? No wonder they have too many section 8 units. Grow the economy if you don't like it? How do you grow an economy where you don't allow inspection of rental units? Who would live there if you didn't have too? If you want to see an growing economy one of the first things you see if inspections of rental units.
Maybe they could grow their economy by eliminating 85% of their licencing fees and forms. They charge $85 per year to own a public gumball machine.
No, warrantless inspection of rental units is (and always has been) 'unreasonable'.
Note that nothing in either prior or existing law prevented a tenant from requesting an inspection if they thought they were living in sub-standard conditions. Nor does anything in either prior or existing law prevent the inspection of rental units between tenants. Inspecting the apartments of existing tenants does nothing for the social goals you claim to be worried about.
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply. Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://Www.workstar24.com
There's a difference between inspecting unoccupied and occupied rental units.
What do you think they should do if the renter in an occupied unit objects to admitting inspectors?
Landlords should be able to inspect their units, with proper notice. There is no good rationale for uninvited government inspections. It's an invasion of privacy by an outside organization – one that persecutes people for many things that aren't actual crimes against the life, liberty, or property of others – and a waste of stolen tax money.
Yes, and good to see you again.
"...How do you grow an economy where you don’t allow inspection of rental units? Who would live there if you didn’t have too? If you want to see an growing economy one of the first things you see if inspections of rental units...
Sarc or stupidity? Leaning towards the later.
"Complaints about too many "Section 8" houses are typically a stand-in for complaints about having too many poor people, some of whom get into trouble with the law"
Says somebody who, in his whole life, has never lived in or near low income housing.
It only takes a single asshole to turn people off that program.
I’ve lived this. My folks have had rental property since I was old enough to remember. They used to take tenants from these types of programs. Until too many of them wrecked the houses they rented. The agencies never have any liability, and a damage deposit doesn’t cover much. When I started acquiring my own income property I made sure to never accept tenants that couldn’t pay for themselves.
Too many of the oriole who receive assistance are shitty tenants. It’s just not worth it.
"...When I started acquiring my own income property I made sure to never accept tenants that couldn’t pay for themselves..."
Never assume the gov't will accept liability without a fight you cannot afford.
Oriole? I agree with you on your post. My father owned a house and when he moved he rented instead of selling. The people that got in there refused to leave, left all the windows open in winter and cranked the heat to 90 and generally destroyed the house. Took him almost a year to force them out then many thousands to fix the house enough to sell. He swore he would never rent to low income again and I don't blame him.
TMJ
What does the temporomandibular joint have to do with anything?
We're marching marching to Shibboleth
With the eagle and the Institute for Justice
Suing Zion till the death
Until we meeet our last reward... (stop resisting!)
You’ve been committed, right? I assume they give you intermittent access to a computer wherever you’re locked up. I just can’t imagine you living on your own.
I can tell the author has never perused Section 8 housing. It's full of crime and are shitholes. That the city want's to inspect the units to make sure they are livable doesn't seem like a stretch to me. Don't want Government looking into your house? Get a job and rent your own instead of relying on Uncle Sugar to provide one. Depend on government and you are at the mercy of whatever they want to do to you
I earn $100 per hour while taking risks and travelling to remote parts of the world. I worked remotely last week while in Rome, Monte Carlo, and eventually Paris. I’m back in the USA this week. I only perform simple activities from this one excellent website. see it,
Click Here to Copy…… http://Www.Smartcash1.com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM