The Government Hasn't Learned a Thing From the Baby Formula Shortage
With the FORMULA Act soon to expire, the U.S. baby formula market is about to return to the conditions that left it so vulnerable to a shortage in the first place.

Earlier this year, a baby formula shortage caused panic around the nation. While temporary FDA approval of several foreign brands helped to increase formula supply, millions of families could soon be thrown back into uncertainty as the FORMULA Act, which eliminated tariffs on formula imports, is set to expire at the end of this month.
The expiration of the FORMULA Act will mark a return to an anti-market policy which is likely to rapidly increase the price of imported baby formula. As U.S.-manufactured formula supplies are still down—though notably better than during the height of the shortage—the return of tariffs could soon cause a major uptick in the number of families struggling to find enough formula to feed their children.
A baby formula shortage gripped the nation starting in February of this year, after a major U.S. formula manufacturer issued recalls on three of its products and shut down its largest plant. At its peak 10 states faced out-of-stock rates of 90 percent or higher. At first, the formula shortage was exacerbated by existing FDA regulations, whose labyrinthine label and ingredient rules effectively prevented formula imports—even imports from the European Union, whose health requirements on formula are more up-to-date than U.S. regulations.
However, in May, the FDA announced that it would begin using "discretion" when enforcing its formula label requirements, leading to eight foreign companies receiving approval for their baby formula. When the FORMULA Act passed two months later, eliminating tariffs on imported formula, the supply of foreign baby formula continued to rise.
While it's difficult to say for certain that imported formula alleviated the shortage, as the closed Abbot formula factory restarted manufacturing at nearly the exact same time, the Biden Administration itself has credited foreign formula as a major reason that the crisis ended.
While the baby formula shortage has been past critical levels for several months, formula supplies remain strained, even with increased imports. "It is a far cry from the full-on crisis that existed in, say, July of this year, when a lot of store shelves were empty," Scott Lincicome, the director of the Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies at the Cato Institute told Reason, "Now for most folks out there, your local CVS might have a limited supply of formula, you might have a few specific brands or types out online, but in general you're gonna be able to make do."
This status quo is set to end shortly. The FORMULA Act will expire at the end of the year, and while the FDA will allow select formula imports until October 2025, foreign companies will be subjected to high tariffs on their product, causing price increases and likely shortages of the imported formula that so many families now rely on.
"Any time you add a tax of approximately 25 percent, some of that's gonna get passed onto consumers, and domestic prices will adjust upward to match the import prices," Lincicome told Reason. "And the second thing is, any time you add a tax of that level, you're gonna get less supply. Consumers and importers, retailers in the rest of the United States will try to avoid importing more formula if they can because there's gonna be less demand for it, cause it's gonna be expensive."
Thus, instead of learning from this year's shortage and liberalizing the baby formula market to allow for more imports, the Biden administration seems set to allow the FORMULA Act to expire—allowing the market to begin returning to the same regulatory regime that made U.S. baby formula supplies so vulnerable to a shortage in the first place.
"We're essentially going right back to the screwed-up market we had," Lincicome told Reason. "We have a domestic market that's highly concentrated, and a wall that prevents import supplies, to potentially diversify a bit. And the result is, when you have a single factory closure, you essentially cripple the who market, if not collapse it."
Unnecessary regulations on baby formula imports are what caused this year's dire formula shortage in the first place. Even with supplies approaching normalcy, levying high tariffs on foreign baby formula leaves U.S. supplies at risk for another shortage—and millions of families hanging in the balance.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Because they never do, except to just "government harder."
I am making $92 an hour working from home. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $16,000 a month by working on a laptop, that was truly astounding for me, she prescribed for me to attempt it simply.
Everybody must try this job now by just using this website. http://www.LiveJob247.com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK. 🙂
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
I am making $162/hour telecommuting. I never imagined that it was honest to goodness yet my closest companion is earning $21 thousand a month by working on the web, that was truly shocking for me, she prescribed me to attempt it simply
COPY AND OPEN THIS SITE________ http://Www.Salaryapp1.com
Yep, but I'd say "govern MORE". They don't do a whole lot "harder" other than make life harder for responsible law-abiding citizens.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35,000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job csx07 online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28,125 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link——————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
appropriate username.
Google is by and by paying $27485 to $29658 consistently for taking a shot at the web from home. I have joined this action 2 months back and I have earned $31547 in my first month from this action. I can say my life is improved completely! Take a gander at it what I do.....
For more detail visit the given link..............>>> onlinecareer1
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
I don't get paid even $0 an hour to flag spam for Reason. I don’t even get a lousy t-shirt.
I just wish we knew that flagging the spam had any effect.
I've tried a couple of times coming back to week-old flagged spam. What is most annoying is that flagging spam leaves that spammer in action for considerable time after. Seems like it ought to automatically ban that handle forever. I understand problems with flagging IP addresses.
Reason doesn't take spamming very seriously. Maybe that ought to be a weekly listener question.
It's also annoying coming to an article with hundreds of comments and no flagged spam. Does it mean that I am the only spam flagger? Does it mean that flagged spam was removed entirely and this is all new spam?
Sarcasm once said he mutes spammers instead of flagging spam, which strikes me as a typical sarcasm approach which benefits only him.
I only mute them, too. Flag from my research (logged into my account vs out of it) seems to only block the comment for my individual account and is only for that specific message - seems like everyone else can read them. Is that not the case? I figured flag meant they were reviewing for specific issues - child porn links and the like.
I think it just hides the chat. Essentially useless.
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..???? AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)>>> GOOGLE WORK
I only typically flag people I accidentally hit flag on, because there is no confirm. Kind of defeats the purpose if I can't unto a fat finger click.
They need better sign up copcha or something to prevent easy creation of new span accounts.
"...the formula shortage was exacerbated by existing FDA regulations, whose labyrinthine label and ingredient rules effectively prevented formula imports—even imports from the European Union, whose health requirements on formula are more up-to-date than U.S. regulations."
Does anyone seriously believe that the government exists for the people?
The suggestion from the quote above is that the EU government does and the US government doesn't.
For the people that donate to the party.
Without government who would make it harder and more expensive to feed babies for no fucking reason at all?
Now you see why government must extend and increase the child tax credit and provide government day care. People can't afford children any more.
Sᴛᴀʀᴛ ᴡᴏʀᴋɪɴɢ ғʀᴏᴍ ʜᴏᴍᴇ! Gʀᴇᴀᴛ ᴊᴏʙ ғᴏʀ sᴛᴜᴅᴇɴᴛs, sᴛᴀʏ-ᴀᴛ-ʜᴏᴍᴇ ᴍᴏᴍs ᴏʀ ᴀɴʏᴏɴᴇ ɴᴇᴇᴅɪɴɢ ᴀɴ ᴇxᴛʀᴀ ɪɴᴄᴏᴍᴇ… Yᴏᴜ ᴏɴʟʏ ɴᴇᴇᴅ ᴀ ᴄᴏᴍᴘᴜᴛᴇʀ ᴀɴᴅ ᴀ ʀᴇʟɪᴀʙʟᴇ ɪɴᴛᴇʀɴᴇᴛ ᴄᴏɴɴᴇᴄᴛɪᴏɴ… Mᴀᴋᴇ $80 ʜᴏᴜʀʟʏ ᴀɴᴅ ᴜᴘ ᴛᴏ $13000 ᴀ ᴍᴏɴᴛʜ ʙʏ ғᴏʟʟᴏᴡɪɴɢ ʟɪɴᴋ ᴀᴛ ᴛʜᴇ ʙᴏᴛᴛᴏᴍ ᴀɴᴅ sɪɢɴɪɴɢ ᴜᴘ… Yᴏᴜ ᴄᴀɴ ʜᴀᴠᴇ ʏᴏᴜʀ ғɪʀsᴛ ᴄʜᴇᴄᴋ ʙʏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴇɴᴅ ᴏғ ᴛʜɪs ᴡᴇᴇᴋ:) GOOD LUCK.:)
Just open the link————————————–>>OPEN>> USA JOBS ONLINE
Months later and Reason's takes are still extremely shallow on this issue. I would have hoped they'd have looked into the deeper economic issues of why a single factory closure cripples the entire country's supply of food. Yes, it's good to remove trade restrictions and taxes on foreign supply, but why isn't the domestic supply any more robust? Somehow European producers were able to meet the increase demand coming from the US during the shortage, but the USA didn't have any smaller producers who could ramp up production to cover the shortfall?
It's because of SNAP, and more specifically, WIC (Women, Infants, and Children) assistance under the USDA. It's not all the FDA's fault, sometimes it's the four-letter agency. They have soft price controls on things like formula and baby food because they're the majority buyer, and they coercively negotiate prices among two major manufacturers. In exchange for a good price these producers get local monopolies because WIC is buying this stuff up more than private individuals are. Otherwise, if there was a shortage, smaller competitors might be able to ramp up a bit of production while raising prices to match their own added costs and fill in the gaps in the market. This is how you keep a supply chain robust.
For some reason, this publication is scared to talk about how public assistance programs like this cause major negative repercussions for the free market. I understand that crippling something like SNAP would really upset a lot of people, but we're already a fringe political ideology, so we should exist to express the unpopular opinions and convince people of their value.
Implicating the economic impact of WIC? I see that you must want babies to starve.
Access to free baby formula being a right and all.
If babies want to eat, they should get a damn job!
Not so. Reason had a lot to say about WIC here.
Here's one: https://reason.com/2022/05/19/bidens-baby-formula-airlift-stunt-should-never-have-been-necessary/
The most in-depth thing he says is this:
(For more on how the regulations in the WIC program are adding to this government-created formula mess, read this excellent analysis from the Cato Institute's Scott Lincicome)
But, okay, sure.
And the CATO link is right there. You want a copy-n-paste?
Here's two: https://reason.com/2022/06/08/following-usda-guidance-state-clinics-destroyed-thousands-of-cans-of-usable-baby-formula/
And this is about a specific incident involving WIC destroying returned products, not about how their monopolistic use of power created the market failure in the first place. It shouldn't be that hard to point out that mission creep turned supplemental benefits into a subsidy for an entire industry, where they then flex their regulatory power to capture the whole market.
Your laziness exceeds that of the Reason author, who at least provided a link. You did nothing but whine.
Yes; National Socialism and Communist policies ARE very much responsible for needlessly starving babies too... To argue against such is arguing against mountains of history.
Even totally abolishing SNAP would have less effect than you think. Donald Meinshausen — one of the leaders of the modern libertarian movement as a movement, as with the RLA in 1970 — has been having a hard time and moved in with me. He couldn’t afford a full share of the rent so said he’d make up the difference in food. I didn’t want the hassle of qualifying for SNAP for the household, so he started patronizing food pantries/banks. Result? We’re overflowing with food. Tons of food are just being given away by retail and wholesale suppliers. We even get a lot of venison, which for the most part is unsalable in the states but can be processed and given away, and he loves that.
Seems to me operations like the ones we go to could be ramped up to where the poor wouldn’t have to buy food at all, and therefore not be bidding up grocery and commodity prices as SNAP does. We can do it Soviet style, except in this case the cliché is true: We can make it actually work without long lines (it's as fast as or faster than the supermarket) or corruption. And without government compulsion or bureaucracy, since this is all funded privately, unlike SNAP. The establishments even supply non-food items like clothing and toothbrushes.
Tariffs. Not just for eebil Republicans anymore. Hell, it was a Democrat mainstay for two centuries, but then unions migrated to the Republican Party, which is why the GOP is now anti-trade/anti-immigration when those used to be Leftie Democrat mainstays.
Tariffs are taxes paid by domestic consumers. Slash the tariffs like Reagan on a bender.
China is just waiting for US government to lift labeling an ingredient controls: They took over pharmacy, yeast and vitamins. Just wait until China controls baby formula.
Would that be leaded or unleaded?
WIC, the major buyer of formula, has expanded far beyond its congressional mandate, to the point that 53% of babies are enrolled. WIC controls prices and manufacturing, rewarding cronies and discouraging competition and innovation. This actually fits the classic definition of Fascism.
The Abbot plant NEVER was the source of contamination, but FDA knew this for months, still refusing to allow the plant to start up again, because it was "negotiating." Payoffs? Control?
Government messing with the market never ends well.
Right. USDA is just as guilty in this, if not moreso, than the FDA.
I get impatient with the surface-level libertarianism we see from these writers. They've got a lot to say about whatever's new and how it's either a good thing to keep or a bad thing to get rid of, but they don't dig into underlying issues of government that have caused longstanding problems. The slow, cancerous growth of the USDA and the SNAP act with increasing mission creep has the government basically dictating entire industries. We've been taking incremental steps toward fascism ever since the 30s and the New Deal, such that someone living 60 years ago wouldn't be able to make a distinction between the USA and Italy under Mussolini.
Well, this is a news site, not just a "digging into underlying issues" site, which they do a fair amount of also. Also, Cato does a lot more investigative policy pieces and less news.
And not only the USA. I bet if you looked at how Italy's organized now, you couldn't tell where Mussolini ended and his successors began. James Bovard and others pointed out decades ago how much the world is awash in surplus dairy.
Maybe, just maybe, the government of baby killing is just extending beyond abortion on demand?
Ironically; If government would leave both of them alone the people could come out on top.
1) It would seem pretty likely that the FORMULA Act will be extended, even with the election over. What congressman wants to be accused of killing babies.
2) I'm shocked that a learned person from CATO uses a word like "gonna" over and over again. Just "axing" a question here.
post-birth abortion policy.
There is still a massive shortage. The formula section in the store I work at is still almost completely empty.
The FDA loves you and would rather have your baby starve than be subjected to a label that does not meet regulatory requirements.
Point Well Stated... +10000000000
Humorously Tariffs are nothing but tax-collection for the government meant to handle International trade. FDA, USDA, US-Welfare on the other hand are UN-Constitutional Nazi-Empire agencies. And the very Nazi-Controllers that has out-powered domestic food supplies because they are the party of DEMANDS without any acknowledgement of SUPPLY.
Lesson #1512345631 for leftard F'Whits....
When the means of production are owned by the government = The government shuts down the means of production....
Seriously; How did you leftard Marxists get so F'En stupid?
Oh wait; That's right... Trying to justify criminal intentions - THEFT.
"Fixing Our Regulatory Mayhem Upsetting Little Americans"
I swear to lord baby Jesus sleeping quietly in his manger, these people need to stop this process of picking a word and then backwards planning it into an acronym.
Holy shit, is that real? And what was “fixed”?
Our highly paid government focus groups can’t come up with a better acronym than that? Pathetic.
Governments don’t learn.
Apparently "democratic" government has learned quite well how to use Gov-Guns against those icky people to get whatever they want from them (enslaving them). Even when such usage of government is treasonous and criminal.
They've learned how to conquer and consume the USA with a Nazi-Empire. They just haven't learned that THEFT is unsustainable (zero-sum supply) and will eventually fall.
That's not "government learning", that's dumb people being indoctrinated and manipulated to vote for certain kinds of politicians. And neither the voters nor the politicians participating in this are concerned with the eventual fall of the US, they simply want their goodies now.
Part of the problem is that even people who are critical of this (like you and Reason) are historically and politically illiterate.
The problem with baby formula goes way beyond limiting ourselves to domestic production. We import our computer chips, yet still suffered a multi year shortage.
The problem is that too many industries lack both flexibility and slack. If we relied on imports and a massive European factory went offline, would we be in that much better of shape? Only if there was a way to bring additional supplies online. That could be existing factories doing overtime (if they aren't already 24x7 operations, which, they increasingly are), factories enabling mothballed equipment (who, honestly, just has that ready to go?), or other factories switching from a lower value product to baby formula (regulations would make this near impossible).
This is a problem that is going to plague more and more industries, as the cost of equipment in factories is such that manufacturers would rather pay extra for graveyard/weekend shifts than to have the factory only be operational for two shifts per day. I don't really have a solid policy proposal, other than to continue immediate expensing of capital assets and ensuring that industrial real estate is as cheap as possible. To the degree that capital assets are cheaper, it pushes more financial decisions to allow for idle equipment (such as running only 2 shifts per day). And the more idle equipment an economy has, the better it will be able to respond to supply or demand shocks.
Summary; The National Sozialist(Nazi)-Empire agenda....
- The 'working' ?greedy? work 10-hrs for themselves and 90-hrs for the 'poor'...
- The 'poor' ?Nazi-Saints? work 0-hrs for themselves and 90-hrs lobbying for MORE Gov-Gun theft of the ?greedy?.
And as completely predictable; Most people prefer being a 'poor' ?Nazi-Saint? to being a 'working' ?greedy? person.
So; Everyone is working 0-hrs for themselves and 90-hrs for Gov-Gun enslavement of a diminishing supply.
I don't really understand your reply. I'm not talking about unemployment, labor hours of any individual, nor an I really really talking about taxes, except for some minor tweaks to the tax code.
When you build a factory, corporations have a decision to make:
1) Do they build it of size X and plan to run it 24x7?
2) Do they build it of size 1.5X and plan to run it 16x7?
(Or any number of other permutations)
In both cases, the same amount of stuff is produced, and each individual employee works the same number of hours. However, under option 1, they have to find workers for the graveyard shift. Whereas, under option 2, more factory has to be built and furnished. It is mostly a straight forward calculation of labor and turnover cost savings vs capital equipment cost savings. However, if too many factories choose option 1, supply lines get more brittle, because you can't use overtime to increase capacity from option 1.
The whole reason #1 gets chosen constantly.
The 'producers' are required by law/tax to support the 'lazy' and the 'lazy' doesn't build more factory structure or produce. The desire to chose #2 withers away for a #1 and then a #0(no producers/structure) which is actually where the USA is today trying to import everything..
I meant this as a “Reply” to “A Cynical Asshole” albeit it looks like a standalone comment. I’ll smarten up one day, well maybe!
Yep, but I’d say “govern MORE”. They don’t do a whole lot
“harder” other than make life harder for responsible law-
abiding citizens.
My major related concern is the apparent demise of the "anti trust" laws and enforcement - which is ultimately more important.
This problem could easily be solved by allowing men to breast feed.
I think Biden just signed that bill. 🙂
"The Government Hasn't Learned a Thing From the Baby Formula Shortage"