Officers Who Ignored Man Paralyzed in Their Custody Are Charged With Misdemeanors
“You're cracking, you just drank too much,” said one officer as Randy Cox cried that his neck was broken.

After ignoring Randy Cox's pleas for medical help for nearly an hour, the five New Haven police officers who dismissed Cox's claims that his neck was broken have been arrested on charges of reckless endangerment and cruelty to persons. While the indifference with which Cox, now paralyzed from the chest down, was faced is disturbing, the arrest of the officers responsible gives a faint hope for future accountability.
"It's hard to see officers charged," New Haven Chief of Police Karl Jacobson said to the New Haven Register. "But it's also what we've been talking about since the beginning. We need to be transparent… You can make mistakes, but you can't treat people the way Randy Cox was treated."
On June 19, 36-year-old New Haven resident Randy Cox was arrested on minor gun possession charges. After his arrest, officers loaded the handcuffed Cox into the back of a police van, driven by Officer Oscar Diaz. The van was not outfitted with seatbelts, and after Diaz stopped suddenly to avoid a collision with another vehicle, Cox was flung to the back wall of the van, where body camera footage shows him violently hitting his head.
When Diaz went to check on Cox, body camera footage shows the prone Cox repeatedly telling Diaz "I can't move," adding "I fall. I cannot move my arms." After calling an ambulance, Diaz continued driving Cox to a local detention center.
When Diaz arrived at a local detention center, four other officers refused to believe that Cox was injured, roughly placing him into a wheelchair and even mocking him for supposedly being too drunk or high to move.
"You're not even trying!" said one officer. "You're cracking, you just drank too much."
Despite Cox's obvious distress—at one point crying out "Oh my god, [inaudible] I fucking broke my neck"—the officers responsible for processing Cox completely ignored him, seemingly convinced that he was faking or drunk. "He's perfectly fine," one officer said after placing the limp Cox in a holding cell.
As it turns out, Cox was not perfectly fine.
According to a statement later released by New Haven Mayor Justin Elicker, when the ambulance arrived, Cox was taken to Yale New Haven Hospital where he immediately underwent neck surgery and was eventually placed on a ventilator. Cox is now paralyzed from the chest down—and his legal team has launched a $100 million lawsuit against the city.
On Monday, the involved officers were arrested on misdemeanor charges including reckless endangerment in the second degree and cruelty to persons, according to Jacobson.
"While today's news that these officers will face some accountability is an important first step towards justice for Randy, we know there is more work to be done on his behalf," attorney Ben Crump said in a statement obtained by the New Haven Register. "We will continue to fight for him throughout this process, and stand beside him as he navigates the long road toward recovery."
While many such injuries in police custody go unpunished, the arrest of the officers involved in Cox's injury—even if just for misdemeanor charges—gives a small hope of accountability for such inhumane behavior.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
and his legal team has launched a $100 million lawsuit against the city.
So explain to me why his legal team isn't focusing all their efforts on suing the officers?
Can't get blood from a turnip.
But you can stomp the turnip flat trying.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by (gbf-06) doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
.
.
Just open the link———————————————>>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> http://WWW.WORKSFUL.COM
His legal team is a team. The word team means more than one person accomplishing similar goals. Since there is more than one person they are able to get more than one thing done.
Not seeing the charge here. The civil suit against the city I can see though.
Are we now criminalizing being mean? Are the Liberaltarians at Reason back to pretending any bad outcome is the fault of Police regardless? I'm sure Reason will be all condolences when someone loses a gun trying to buckle in a detainee and the cop gets executed, wait, no they celebrate those.
Emma, may you be forced to live in the world you demand and may I be nowhere near to catch a bullet for your smug stupidity.
The same cops who intentionally caused this guy to bang around inside the van like a pinball will take children away from parents who don't buckle their kids.
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> http://WWW.RICHSALARIES.COM
You let us know when that happens, we'll compare that with how many times cops' meanness injures people, and bet on which is worse, shall we?
Seems like they're criminalizing denying proper medical care to an individual for whose safety they were responsible. Whenever someone in the NFL injures their neck, it's common for the player to be roughly tossed into a wheelchair and laughed at by the rest of the team, yup yup.
Shut up you bootlicking faggot.
That's not a boot he's licking...
I’m somehow not surprised you can’t read but here is your second chance:
On Monday, the involved officers were arrested on misdemeanor charges including reckless endangerment in the second degree and cruelty to persons, according to Jacobson.
When in custody the people who have you in custody have a responsibility for your safety cause you no longer are capable of performing it yourself. If you are chained to a van and there is a flood they are responsible for saving you. In the United States of America we have rights. This is one of those rights. Welcome to America.
after Diaz stopped suddenly to avoid a collision with another vehicle, Cox was flung to the back wall of the van
I am having trouble understanding New Haven physics. Wouldn't he have ended up at the front of the van?
It he has normal inertia, he should.
Maybe she meant the wall of the back of the forward compartment, which would be at the front of the rear compartment?
Or, maybe he hit the back wall after the driver accelerated very suddenly after slowing down to avoid a collision?
I somehow suspect that causing multiple collisions inside the back of the van was the purpose.
Look up "nickle ride".
Or, maybe he hit the back wall after the driver accelerated very suddenly after slowing down to avoid a collision?
Imagine how many broken necks we'd have every day if the start and stop of every subway car meant a $100M pay out from the local transit authority.
I'd love to drive the van that can topple a seated person into the back door with enough force to break their neck.
Also, I'm a little confused about the statement "The van was not outfitted with seatbelts". Do they mean in the cab? Because I see a lot of loose webbing and, uh, tie down ratchets in the photo and I find the narrative that a police van doesn't have any way to restrain someone to be... unbelievable.
Play stupid games, wind up paralyzed or charged with a misdemeanor for, seemingly, allowing someone to paralyze themselves.
Maybe the van was in reverse.
Yes, the back wall of a van or truck is actually at the front of the cargo area. That's because the barrier at the back (stern?) of the van or truck is the back door. You can't just say the wall because that's ambiguous with the side walls. You could call it the front wall but, well, it's english. We take that quote about consistency being the hobgoblin of little minds to heart.
You could call it the front wall but, well, it’s english.
Yup. "Front wall in the direction of travel." or "Front wall of the rear compartment."
We take that quote about consistency being the hobgoblin of little minds to heart.
So, just "consistency being the hobgoblin of little minds" or also "The government which governs least, governs best." and "Just the facts." If, just the former, how consistent of you.
When we have to restrain patients, anything that happens to that patient becomes our responsibility and our "fault" because we are preventing them from being able to protect themselves. If they choke on their own vomit, phlegm, whatever ... it's our fault for not watching them or preventing them from having agency to save themselves. I don't see why this should be any different from what we expect from police. If the police prevent you from being able to save yourself, they are then responsible for saving you themselves.
On another note: How does a police van, dedicated to transporting prisoners, not have proper seatbelts or restraints. ?
It's different because the police are above the law.
When we have to restrain patients, anything that happens to that patient becomes our responsibility and our “fault” because we are preventing them from being able to protect themselves. If they choke on their own vomit, phlegm, whatever … it’s our fault for not watching them or preventing them from having agency to save themselves.
And? A patient chokes to death on their own phlegm, automatic Murder 1? Or a suspension pending a case-by-case review and slap on the wrist? Hospital deaths have been among the leading cause of death for something like 50 yrs. The only way to prevent it is to shut down the hospitals (again).
Depending on the scope of the accident, you could get a slap on the wrist all the way up to losing your job & license which allows to get another job in the same field (gross negligence). And if they deem you did it intentionally you are immediately subject criminal prosecution and / or civil suit with no QI umbrella to hide under. Can you say the same for police ?
The city is getting sued, no QI involved. The same way if you let a patient choke to death and the hospital gave you a slap on the wrist, the NOK would sue the hospital, not you, because if they sued you, you would present the hospital's judgement as proof that it was an accident/self-inflicted/unpreventable. Watch the video and read my comments above. He should've been strapped in but he also shouldn't have leaned forward, against momentum, into the slide. There's no evidence anyone tried to kill or even harm him. People ride in subway cars all the time without maiming themselves. Forcing police to straightjacket, hog and cargo tie every suspect is going to facilitate as many injuries as it prevents. The same way every patient who strolls into the ER or even the waiting room doesn't automatically get strapped to a gurney.
Stupid games. Stupid prizes. This is not the QI case you are looking for.
Surprising! I’ve been making 100 Dollars an hour since I started freelance on the Internet six months ago. I work long hours a day from home and do the basic work that I get from the business I met online. share this work for you opportunity This is definitely the best job I have ever done.
Go to this link...................>>> onlinecareer1
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. [bdt-13] Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:. EXTRA DETAILS HERE:..... Salaryapp1.com