The Crime Backlash Mostly Failed To Materialize on Election Night
Apocalyptic attack ads about crime failed to drive a red wave, and criminal justice reform candidates were still successful in several local races around the country.

Despite predictions that rising violent crime would sink candidates that backed criminal justice reforms, those candidates mostly survived Tuesday night's elections, and reform-minded prosecutor and sheriff candidates even defeated incumbents in a few key races.
After the recall earlier this year of progressive San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin, opponents of criminal justice reform were confident that voters' concerns over crime would translate into a national backlash—and polling seemed to back them up. In an ABC/The Washington Post poll released in late September, 52 percent of respondents favored the Republican Party to handle crime, compared to 38 percent for Democrats. A Greenberg Research survey this fall asked voters what they feared most if Democrats win full control of the government; 56 percent chose "crime and homelessness out of control in cities and police coming under attack."
But while rising crime created headwinds for candidates who supported criminal justice reform, the apocalyptic reaction never quite materialized.
Democratic New York Gov. Kathy Hochul survived a challenge by Republican candidate Lee Zeldin, despite attacks linking her to the state's bail reforms and an endless stream of New York Post headlines depicting New York City as a gore-soaked hellscape. It was still a very good night for New York Republicans, but not the red wave they were hoping for.
Bail reform backlash did appear in Ohio and Alabama, though. As Reason's Billy Binion reports, both states passed ballot initiatives restricting when defendants can be released on cash bail.
In Pennsylvania, Democratic Senate candidate John Fetterman won, despite a barrage of Republican attacks on his criminal justice record, such as serving on the state's Board of Pardons, opposing mandatory life without parole sentences, and supporting progressive Philadelphia District Attorney Larry Krasner.
In Oregon, another state where Republicans were hoping crime, homelessness, and general dysfunction would propel them to the governor's seat for the first time since 1982, Democratic candidate Tina Kotek is narrowly leading her Republican opponent. The race has yet to be called, though.
Down the ballot is where things get more interesting.
In Los Angeles, dictatorial sheriff Alex Villanueva is trailing his challenger Robert Luna by a significant margin. Villanueva has been embroiled in a series of baroque scandals and drama for much of his tenure, using his powers to retaliate against whistleblowers, reporters, other city officials, and the inspector general's office that is supposed to oversee his department. Voters appear to have tired of the clown show.
And if you needed a literal sign of the times from Los Angeles:
https://twitter.com/chadloder/status/1590213966999216128
Minneapolis voters elected Mary Moriarty, a career public defender, as their new district attorney. Moriarty defeated Holton Dimick, a former district court judge and prosecutor who complained to Mother Jones that "defund the police" rhetoric "was basically giving the criminal element in our city and across the county, the go-ahead and commit crimes sign."
Voters also showed the door to Massachusetts' longest-serving sheriff, Republican Tom Hodgson. Hodgson was recently described as the "Arpaio of the east," a reference to former Arizona sheriff Joe Arpaio, who was infamous for degrading conditions and constitutional abuses within his jail. Hodgson's jail has been dogged by suicides and allegations of medical neglect and unsanitary conditions.
In King County, Washington, Leesa Manion held a comfortable lead over Jim Ferrell in the race for county prosecutor, as of last night. The Seattle Times reported that, while both served as prosecutors in the office, Ferrell has run on a platform of rolling back many of the reforms of the previous county prosecutor:
Ferrell campaigned on "resetting" an office he portrayed as having gone overboard on social justice reform. In particular, he criticized certain diversion programs offering alternatives to traditional prosecution and incarceration because they lack judicial oversight.
He also said thresholds for filing some types of cases, such as felony theft, are too low, and promised a review.
Not all progressive prosecutor candidates were successful. Civil rights attorney Pamela Price narrowly lost her bid to become district attorney in California's Alameda County.
Although every election is the result of its own very specific time and circumstances, one takeaway from Tuesday night is that criminal justice reform, as both a local and national issue, may not thrive during rises in crime, but it can survive.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
After the recall earlier this year of progressive San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin, opponents of criminal justice reform
Just "against reform". No reform allowed here. Let's not mention what reforms, what actual, no-shit boots-on-the-ground policies. I'm just "anti-reform". Like one is anti-vaxx when he becomes squeamish about his eleventieth booster shot of an EUA vaccine.
Opposing all criminals getting an unlimited supply of get-out-of-jail-free cards is not "opposing reform". In fact, it's precisely that policy that needs the reform.
Reason’s continual propping up of these assholes really begs the question of: What the fuck do all of these editors do all day?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, i’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! i do know You currently making a lot of (ubs-06) greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
Just open the link--------------------------------------------->>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Google pay 200$ per hour my last pay check was $8500 working 1o hours a week online. My younger brother friend has been averaging 12000 for months now and he works about 22 hours a week. I cant believe how easy it was once I tried it outit..
🙂 AND GOOD LUCK.:)
HERE====)> ???.????????.???
If I remember correctly there were some discussions happening around QI and things like training cops to *gasp* deescalate instead of initiating violence at the first available opportunity. Then BLM came along and turned policing into a race issue while putting forth moronic ideas like defunding the police. Democrats latched on which meant Republicans had to oppose the entire concept as a matter of principle. So now Republicans must oppose any and all criminal justice reform simply because Democrats liked the idea.
Start getting paid each month more than $17,000+ just by w0rking 0nline from home. Last month i have earned andreceived $18539 from this easy 0nline j0b. This 0nline j0b is just amazing and regular earni ng from this are just awesome. Start making extra dollars 0nline just by follow instructions on this website..,
Here► http://www.pay.hiring9.com
It’s not up to ‘eleventieth,’ Missuh Br’er Rabbit! ?
Me, I's born and raised in de briar patch, so vaxes is fine wit' me! 😉
I get paid over 190$ per hour working from home with 2 kids at home. I never thought I’d be able to do it but my best friend earns over 10k a month doing this and she convinced me to try. The potential with this is endless. Heres what I’ve been doing..
HERE====)> ???.????????????.???
The GOP is consistently attacked by the bolshie media as "extremists" and god knows what else (to be fair if the GOP has balls and went right at the media exposing the bolshies who run it it would expose the pedo/corruption/old world grudges against certain tribes in America that drives the media..) and it works. The women in my family wanted to send a message to the GOP on "abortion" rights. I explained how Roe was a bad decision constitutionally and the decision belongs to the States but it is irrelevant for emotional people. Inflation? Weaponizing federal agencies as the DNC Stasi? Deficit spending destroying the economy? Ukraine insanity and the continuing to murder POC in Yemen with US weapons? The rise of the MAP movement/Transgender push in children? None of it mattered..it was abortion, abortion, abortion....
https://twitter.com/BradWilcoxIFS/status/1590409234818420737?t=7gxDqaGhlYfEosW2IhDMIw&s=19
Married men broke Republican by 20 pts
Married women broke R by 14 pts
Unmarried men broke R by 7 pts
But *unmarried women* broke D "by whopping 37 pts"
[Link]
Is that guy a biologist?
Hmm. I wonder why those women are unmarried?
Just because they're 100lbs over weight, purple and green hair, with nose rings and anti male tats shouldn't stop any male from being interested in them.
I think the Roe decision probably was more of a galvanizer than conservatives are willing to admit.
I’m straight up tinfoily about the timing of the SCOTUS decision and the motives of a few of the “conservative” judges who made it. And the lack of a search for the leak, etc.
But that said, I think it’s probably more of an over all tipping point we’ve reached nationally. We’ve hit critical mass with the number of people who directly benefit from government machines. Be they federal, state, or municipal.
I find it way easier to believe, a mix of single issue youngsters and people who know who butters their bread stymied the red wave. Rather than a concerted rational moral aversion to “election deniers”.
Interestingly though, the congressional seat here in the western chunk of maryland may upset the sleazy dem incumbent (Trone). His rep opponent Parrot seems fairly kooky (according to dem ads) and barely campaigned himself. Which is interesting. And the Frederick county school board might be getting an injection of specifically anti-indoctrination members. But there’s still only 73% counted last I checked…
Honestly, I'm not sure. Most of these single women are progressives so they're voting team Blue no matter what.
Either single moms who are angry with "men" and want a nice warm sexy "govt" to give them the retribution against the guys who dumped them or young single women who are "emotional" with abortion...don't want to be held responsible for their actions..as abortion "rights" really isn't about rape or incest for many who want a "get out of jail" free card for riding the merry go round.
Truly disappointing that so many put the continued ability to murder babies above everything else.
Yeah, if Dobbs/abortion truly is what motivated voters like this, I'm just at an utter loss. People were willing to excuse 8% inflation, lockdowns, school closures, $5 gas, tens of billions to Ukraine, DoJ investigations of parents speaking at schoolboard meetings, deliberately kneecapping energy independence, a corrupt-as-fuck president, soaring crime, and an open border....for the option of killing second and third trimester babies. I honestly cannot wrap my head around this one.
Abortion is pretty much the lefts 2A. And while it’s not hard to find some psycho woke eugenicist lefty who can’t tell the difference between removing a zygote and vivisecting a biologically autonomous baby 8 months later, it’s easier to find pro-lifers who won’t make these distinctions.
So there’s none of that early vs. late logic being implied anywhere. Actually having the GOP establishment bandy about the idea of a national ban while people like me are trying to make a states based argument didn’t help, either. To the point where I’m open to theories of self sabotage.
Probably the smart thing would have been for the Republicans to offer compromise on abortion (and yes, I get that many don't want compromise with "evil" on what they see as a moral issue). Bans after 16 weeks, perhaps. That's almost 4 months, for heaven's sake, you should be able to figure it out by then. Making it clear that actual medically necessary (not BS mental health reasons) later term abortions won't be messed with would be good too.
Well, young single women are who gets abortions and tend to be left leaning.
I'm pro legal abortion, but I agree that it's disappointing that it is placed above all else by so many people. I'll take Roe being overturned if it means more justices who are good on guns, property rights and think that there are at least some limitations on the size and scope of the federal government.
I have to agree. There are a lot of single-issue voters on abortion, and the Dobbs decision played right into the hands of the "those evil republicans who want to take away your rights" messaging.
People will generally vote for whomever they hate less.
Single women have little to gain from the patriarchy, so they're going to go woke.
I see the pro-crime narrative continues apace here among the leftist editors.
I quit working at shoprite and now I make $65-85 per/h. How? I'm working online! My work didn't exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new… after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now I couldn't be happier.
Here’s what I do...............>>> onlinecareer1
Just wait until some little liberal is the victim of a crime. Not just having their I phone stolen but a serious crime against their person.
How about rape, of a vicious mugging or maybe being pushed onto subway tracks. How about being carjacked at gunpoint? Isn't that all about reparations and sheit?
America's liberal run cities are out of control and everyone knows it but liberals refuse to admit it.
The election of Hochul as N.Y. governor proves many people refuse to live in reality.
People deserve the kind of government they voted for.
Philadelphia's 500,000 votes went about 83% for Fetterman and 17% for Oz. It doesn't much matter how Red the rural counties are when the urban jungle throws up those kinds of margins.
But did they really or is it just like Detroit and other Dem cities where they call 20 ballots 200 and the fictitious ballots going to the Dem and the Den AG refusing to audit or change the results?
Phily votes dem because they are on the govt payroll directly or indirectly. That is not going to change until the currency fails...national divorce might be the only solution to avoiding bolshie cultural marxist takeover at this point. Or a currency crisis.
Good and hard.
And no lube, crucial detail! 🙂
no big, just stay in your cities and away from mine. thank you.
Ah, but it never works that way, especially with gangs that cross State and National borders and some of which are as powerful as Nation-States.
The Chad Loder who CJ Ciaramella quotes is an Antifa thug in LA who has organized numerous confrontations and beatdowns of political opponents.
https://thepostmillennial.com/la-antifa-member-chad-loder-sued-by-woman-for-falsely-claiming-shes-a-criminal-convict
He's against the police for sure, so that they can be replaced with his thug Marxist gang.
And CJ Ciaramella is too naive to see it.
Ciaramella isn't naive, he's evil.
Weird how far right people are never "accidentally" interviewed by Reason without their political affiliation specifically noted.
Damn, that is at very least some lazy investigation by C.J.
So the "criminal justice reform" folks won in blue jurisdictions while tough-on-crime politicians won in red ones. It's almost as if right-leaning electorates vote for conservatives while left-leaning ones vote for liberals.
Let's not fool ourselves: if crime and homelessness have remained such enduring problems in cities like Los Angeles and Portland, it's because the people in those cities are fairly tolerant of these things. If they wanted to get rid of these things, they would've done so a long time ago.
Also, don't forget Nevada. The Republican candidate is most likely to win governor, and he's no friend of criminal justice reform.
Republican candidates messaging was poor on both the crime and immigration issues. They did point out the problems but failed to state what they were going to do to solve the problems. Simply stating that the Democrats screwed up wasn't enough to carry the day. They needed to offer actual solutions.
Greetings, CountMontyC, and congrats on your escape and revenge! 🙂
You are so correct and Libertarians could do better on messaging too by killing two birds with one stone. Eliminating "victimless crime" laws would make more room, time, and money for the system to deal with crimes that have real victims. Also legalizing drugs in particular would eliminate the externalities of gang turf violence and extortion that come with black market drugs.
The Crime Backlash Mostly Failed To Materialize on Election Night
Doesn't mean that 'The weed of crime' doesn't exist and still doesn't 'bear bitter fruit!'
Perhaps the Reason staff will see when they get what happened in my town when a whole parking lot of cars got their catalytic converters sawed off.
In large areas of New York City and the surrounding suburbs in New York State crime consists of catalytic converter thefts and people looking for cash in your car ashtray. The neighborhoods where the majority of crime is happening are easily avoided by most people.