Pot Prohibition Continues Collapsing, and Psychedelic Bans Could Be Next
Two more states legalized recreational marijuana on Tuesday, while decriminalization of five natural psychedelics looks like a winner in Colorado.

Voters on Tuesday approved the legalization of recreational marijuana in Maryland and Missouri while rejecting similar measures in Arkansas, North Dakota, and South Dakota. Meanwhile, voters in five Texas cities passed ballot measures that bar local police from issuing citations or making arrests for low-level marijuana possession. But the most striking election result for drug policy reformers looking beyond the ongoing collapse of marijuana prohibition happened in Colorado, where a broad psychedelic decriminalization measure is winning by two points with 80 percent of votes counted.
Prior to yesterday's elections, 37 states had approved marijuana for medical purposes, and 19 of them also had legalized recreational use. The Maryland and Missouri results raise the latter number to 21.
The outcome in Maryland, a blue state where surveys indicated strong support for marijuana legalization, was widely expected. But the margin of victory is still impressive: Nearly two-thirds of voters approved a measure that legalizes possession and home cultivation for adults 21 or older while instructing the state legislature to authorize commercial production and distribution. The outcome in Missouri, a red state where support for legalization fell short of a majority in most pre-election polls, was more surprising: Although the initiative was controversial even among reformers, it won by about six points.
While Arkansas and North Dakota both have medical marijuana programs, voters in those states evidently remain skeptical of broader legalization. The Arkansas and North Dakota initiatives lost by about 12 points and 10 points, respectively. The outcome in South Dakota, where a lawsuit backed by Gov. Kristi Noem blocked a 2020 legalization initiative that was approved by 54 percent of voters, was more disappointing: Even though the 2022 initiative was shorn of potentially controversial provisions authorizing commercial sales, it lost by six points.
Unlike all of those states, Texas has not legalized marijuana even for medical use (except for low-THC CBD products). Possession of two ounces or less is still a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail and a maximum fine of $2,000, and those penalties are doubled for amounts between two and four ounces. The penalties for possessing cannabis extracts, which are treated as a felony even in cases involving tiny amounts, are even more severe.
This is the context in which Austin voters last May approved an ordinance that generally prohibits the city's police department from citing or arresting people for "Class A or Class B misdemeanor possession of marijuana offenses"—i.e., offenses involving less than four ounces. Yesterday voters in Denton, Elgin, Harker Heights, Killeen, and San Marcos passed similar measures.
Compared to outright legalization or decriminalization, which would require amending or repealing state laws, these are baby steps. But they may be the best that Texans who oppose pot prohibition can manage for the foreseeable future. Although surveys indicate that most Texans favor legalization, Gov. Greg Abbott, a Republican who was re-elected yesterday, is not listening to them. Abbott supports downgrading possession of two ounces or less to a Class C misdemeanor, punishable by no more than a $500 fine. But otherwise, he sees nothing wrong with the way Texas treats cannabis consumers and the people who supply them.
"Texans have shown that they want major cannabis law reforms in Texas via polling, legislative engagement, and now at the local ballot box," says Jax James, who directs the Texas chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws. "This will have a positive impact on the almost half a million people living in these cities. While these local advancements are important in mitigating harm on citizens and reprioritizing law enforcement time, they result in a patchwork of differing marijuana enforcement policies based on location. It is time for lawmakers to take steps to enact statewide reform when they convene in January 2023."
While Texas lags behind on drug policy reform, Colorado seems to be forging ahead. If its lead holds up, Colorado's Proposition 122 will eliminate civil and criminal penalties for a wide range of noncommercial conduct related to consumption of five natural psychedelics: psilocybin, psilocyn, dimethyltryptamine, ibogaine, and mescaline. The measure allows adults 21 or older to produce, possess, transport, obtain, or share those substances.
Like a groundbreaking initiative that Oregonians approved in 2020, Proposition 122 would eventually allow adults to obtain and consume psilocybin at state-licensed businesses. Also like Oregon's initiative, Proposition 122 does not require that the customers of those businesses have any particular medical or psychiatric diagnosis. But Colorado's initiative covers a wider range of substances and conduct. It is broader than any psychedelic reform enacted until now, pointing the way to less punitive, more tolerant drug policies that go beyond winding down the war on weed.
That prospect alarms The Denver Post's editorial board. Proposition 122 "goes too far, too fast for Colorado," it warned last week. The Post acknowledged evidence that psychedelics "can help treat debilitating post-traumatic stress disorders, treatment-resistant depression, severe anxiety, and other mental illness." But it objected to the initiative's broad decriminalization provisions because they might allow psychedelic use outside of a "medical" context.
"While the intent of legalizing possession and cultivation is for medical treatment," the Post said, "we fear a robust market for recreational use would thrive. Increased legal tolerance will increase demand, which will increase the temptation for profiteering."
In the Post's view, increased tolerance is bad, because people might use psychedelics for fun. Judging from the election returns so far, Coloradans have decided that is a nightmare they can live with.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
While I agree that I'm not for prohibition I'm not sure if I have seen the overwhelming good that Jacob wants to believe is the natural outcome of this. I'm not saying individual cases can't benefit from the free access to these goods, but what I'm saying is that my roads are now line with more dumps and gross store fronts to go with the casinos and bars. I haven't seen this blossoming of humanity because of it, but I can smell their new blossoms everywhere. I guess I always figured folks would not be so vice driven and there would be a better natural balance of things (Yes my idolized and hopeful perception as the markets tell me the balance). So sure it's great people can choose what they wanted but I guess I expected a more measured growth into everyday life.
bud ... be kind
Touche!
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, i’m now creating over $35000 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! i do know You currently making a lot of (ubs-09) greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs.
Just open the link--------------------------------------------->>> http://Www.RichApp1.Com
Adults making their own choices???? Seems dangerous.
I love choices. And I'm all for you making your own choices so long as I am then free to 'step over your body' and avoid coerced contributions to your redemption or your abdication of duty. Because if I can't, then you're saying you have a right to make choices for both of us.
I guess that's my greater point with my ramblings is that the choice to be able to have is great; I'm serious with that belief it's just that I don't need 4 shelters around that do provide that abdication of your duty to contributions.
I guess it depends on how you poll pot.
it's a holiday in Cambodia, don't forget to pack a wife.
don't need it to be legal in Texas I'm currently not paying taxes on it and can get fresher stuff than dispensaries offer
I quit working at shoprite and now I make $65-85 per/h. How? I'm working online! My work didn't exactly make me happy so I decided to take a chance on something new… after 4 years it was so hard to quit my day job but now I couldn't be happier.
Here’s what I do...............>>> onlinecareer1
I'd expected by now the states to be racing to not get left out of the cannabis market, but such a race has not materialized. The fact that voters in some states positively turned down the opportunity bodes ill for progress on the federal front; it's not like the feds are going to feel left behind, they still see it as significantly controversial.
But...but...but...psychedelics make you hallucinate that your grandmother is Osama Bin Laden and then you kill her. After you come-down or "crash" you have no memory of your heinous act. This is such an epidemic in Canada that we're having to attract aging female immigrants. The so-called "grandsons" who took drugs spend the rest of their days drooling in prison.
I love choices. And I’m all for you making your own choices so long as I am then free to ‘step over your body’ and avoid coerced contributions to your redemption or your abdication of duty.
The New America
A drug-ridden, fragmenting, declining nation on fire that has lost its soul as it degenerates into semi-psychosis. How did this disaster occur?
“An autopsy of history would show that all great nations commit suicide.” -Arnold Toynbee (1889-1975)
This nation is committing national suicide. No, the feckless, hypocritical Republicans won't save us. Can we be saved? Yes, by science as described in detail by this commentator in "Retribution Fever". Will anyone listen? Perhaps, a few.