Georgia Sets Early Voting Record, Despite Controversial Voting Law
Many opponents, including the president, criticized the law in misleading terms, obscuring its very real issues.

Early voting in Georgia started this week, in accordance with the state's controversial voting law passed last year. While many worried the new rules would suppress turnout, more than 100,000 Georgians voted on Monday, a state record for the first day of early voting. Similarly, the number of people who voted early in May's primary was more than double the number from the 2018 midterms.
But while opponents' worst fears may not have come to pass, much of their criticism obscured the more noxious parts of the bill.
Georgia Republicans passed S.B. 202 to overhaul the state's voting law just two months after losing both of the state's Senate seats to Democrats and four months after President Donald Trump lost reelection. The so-called "Election Integrity Act of 2021" sought to undo pandemic-era changes to voting rules intended to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.
After the bill's passage, many Democrats and progressives likened the bill to the era of segregation. The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Georgia called it "Georgia's Anti-Voter Law." In an official statement, President Joe Biden called the law "Jim Crow in the 21st Century." But many of these criticisms hyperbolized or elided the bill's very real issues.
Biden told ESPN that the law would "close a polling place at 5 o'clock when working people just get off," suggesting it was intended to disenfranchise blue-collar voters. In fact, the law merely stipulates that polls must stay open between at least 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., with the option of going as long as 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. It also states that polling locations must be open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on at least two Saturdays prior to election day.
Biden also claimed that the law meant that "there will be no absentee ballots under the most rigid circumstances." The law did not end absentee ballots, though, somewhat cravenly, it did limit the reasons a person could request one and cut the time period in which one could request an absentee ballot from six months to less than three. Trump famously insisted for months that mail-in voting was ripe for fraud despite no evidence to support his contention.
According to The Washington Post's roundup of Biden's first 100 days in office, one-eighth of his false statements during that period involved Georgia's voting law.
Meanwhile, there is plenty to dislike about the bill: In addition to sharply narrowing who can request absentee ballots, it significantly curtails the number of ballot drop boxes a county is allowed to have. The New York Times estimated that the four counties comprising metro Atlanta would go from 94 drop boxes to 23. The law also removed Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who famously resisted Trump's entreaties to "find" enough votes to flip Georgia to the former president, as both the chair and a voting member of the State Election Board.
That board further has the power to "suspend" state and county election officials and appoint "temporary" replacements in their stead. In the months after the law passed, it remade entire counties' election boards by replacing Democrats with Republicans.
Clearly, Georgia's voting law has issues: The ability of the state to directly meddle in counties' election boards is a fundamentally illiberal exercise of power, and based on the timing, it seems obvious that the law was intended to placate Trump's ego. But by hyperbolically characterizing the bill as an outright assault on voting rights akin to the racist laws and practices of the past, opponents papered over its more pernicious aspects.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Any outcome besides a Stacey Abrams victory will mean that Georgia is JIM CROW 2.0. Or maybe that RUSSIA HACKED THE ELECTION. Or both.
#ElectionsAreOnlyLegitimateWhenDemocratsWin
Stacey Abrahams 2.0 was hacked by a crow. This is known.
Stacy Abrams Two Point Crow?
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a (adc-50) lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
Bigoted, faux libertarian right-wingers are perhaps my favorite culture war casualties. Replacement -- by their betters -- can't occur too soon.
Ummmmm ....... hey Art? Was that comment meant for someone else? I guarantee I support Abrams more than you. 🙂
Actually never mind. While you're here I'd like to ask you about one of the most humiliating faceplants I've ever seen on Reason.com — your prediction that Biden would expand the Supreme Court to 13 within 6 months of inauguration. It's been more than a year and a half and all he did is swap one liberal justice for another. Meanwhile our favorite SUPER-PRECEDENT Roe v. Wade got overturned.
How did you whiff so badly? How did your Harvard Law training leave you so embarrassingly clueless about the logistics of Supreme Court expansion? How did you so totally misread the impact of ACB joining the Court?
#Oops
You just copypasta that shit without even knowing what you’re responding to, right?
Unintentional parody angry at intentional parody.
You mean Jim Eagle, right?
Boris Crow.
Admits to a record setting day of early voting in GA then proceeds to take a shit on and bitch about the voting bill passed after 2020 elections. And, with that last paragraph proving a positive diagnosis of TDS. LOL, these articles are such trash and fun to make fun of.
I made over $700 per day using my mobile in part time. I recently got my 5th paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing.
Try now............>>> OnlineCareer1
“According to The Washington Post’s roundup of Biden’s first 100 days in office, one-eighth of his false statements during that period involved Georgia’s voting law.”
It must be important for him, if he's promoting so many falsehoods about it.
To be fair, WP is probably seriously undercounting his other lies. His lies about the Georgia Law are blatantly obvious because it says something that can be so easily cross-referenced against what he's said.
The so-called “Election Integrity Act of 2021” sought to undo pandemic-era changes to voting rules intended to mitigate the spread of COVID-19.
The previous rules were not intended to mitigate covid effects, they were intended to make fraud easier and impossible to detect. How does eliminating signature testing mitigate covid?
Yes.
Of note: The duly passed “Election Integrity Act of 2021” doesn’t even nominally, by its very detractors, repeal any previously named act because the bullshit it fixes was such a haphazard, fucked up power grab that legislative bodies, who have an obnoxious penchant for naming every last thing, didn’t even bother to give it a name.
Was it even legislative? I thought some of the changes were simply illegitimate decisions by election officials.
I thought some of the changes were simply illegitimate decisions by election officials.
Correct. That's the point.
Hey, give them a break. It was a novel pandemic. Nobody knew whether ink from pens could spread covid.
Meanwhile, there is plenty to dislike about the bill: In addition to sharply narrowing who can request absentee ballots, it significantly curtails the number of ballot drop boxes a county is allowed to have.
I'm pretty ballot drop boxes never existed anywhere prior to 2020. There was no law on the books saying they were allowed to use them. It's hard to say a new law that authorizes them "restricts them" in comparison to the executive fiat allowing them to be used in a prior election.
You are correct Georgia did not have drop off boxes until 2020 and that was just for covid, so the new law actually increases drop off boxes since there would be no drop off boxes with out it.
Trump famously insisted for months that mail-in voting was ripe for fraud despite no evidence to support his contention.
Election designers have always considered mail in voting to be a fraud risk. Only when Dems started pushing it did they begin to deny this. Also amusing is that the link to "support" this claim that there is no "evidence" deals only with the election that was just over, not to the general understanding that mail in votes are less secure.
Apparently we have to prove fraud exists before we design a system which prevents fraud. This is the sort of insanity you get when you start with the conclusion and work backward to the supposed principles. Clearly no one at Reason has ever developed a process before.
But if you look for said fraud youre an election deniers and your investigation is fraudulent.
Sorta like claiming climate science needs billions in new funding but only that which confirms current settled science; anything skeptical is not science.
Nah. It's when you look for it, claim loudly that there is fraud, and then when you can't find any evidence of fraud that stands up in court, you still insist that there's fraud - then you're a denier and a conspiracy nut.
Agreed.
In their 2005 report, the Carter Center took a generally dim view of mail-in voting and recommended a number of security-enhancing actions that should be taken, like signature verification.
Of course, those actions were expressly ignored in 2020.
These days, we find that in some states, like PA, the Sec State issues orders that override state laws and Supreme Court decisions, just days after the SCOTUS ruled on the case. The law gives reasons to invalidate a ballot, including a requirement that the voter date the ballot. Sec State says, "Nah, we'll still count them."
Sorry, not Carter Center. 2005 Carter-Baker Commission on Federal Election Reform.
"CONFERENCE REPORT
THE CARTER-BAKER COMMISSION:
16 YEARS LATER"
In 2002, Congress – with input from state and local election officials and experts from all sectors of American society – responded by enacting the Help America Vote Act (HAVA) to
address the wide range of issues identified in 2000.
By 2004, however, it was clear that HAVA had not settled all of the arguments about election reform. State laws requiring voters to provide photo identification were generating backlash amid claims of disenfranchisement. Concerns about new voting technology were leading to fears of counting errors. And growing numbers of absentee and mail ballots were raising concerns about the possibility of fraud.
In response to these concerns, former President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James A. Baker, III, agreed to co-chair a bipartisan commission, housed at Washington D.C.’s American University, to examine these and other outstanding election
reform issues. The final report, titled “Building Confidence in U.S. Elections,” stressed the important role of elections in the nation’s democracy and made a series of recommendations, including:
• A national system to connect state and local voter registration lists
• Voter identification based on a universally available REAL ID card
• Policies to improve voter access for all communities, as well as innovations like vote
centers and voter information lookup sites
• Stronger efforts to combat fraud, especially in absentee voting
• Auditable paper backups for all voting technology
Reason staff will ignore this. They are all in for unsecure borders and unsecure ballots.
• A national system to connect state and local voter registration lists • Voter identification based on a universally available REAL ID card • Policies to improve voter access for all communities, as well as innovations like vote centers and voter information lookup sites • Stronger efforts to combat fraud, especially in absentee voting • Auditable paper backups for all voting technology
How many of these things have Republicans been trying to implement in the time since this commission made those recommendations?
Some key points:universally available voter identification – if every eligible voter had easy access to ID, then voter ID requirements would be difficult to argue against. From the 5th Circuit ruling against the 2011 Texas voter ID law:
Ballot integrity is undoubtedly a worthy goal. But the evidence before the Legislature was that in-person voting, the only concern addressed by SB 14, yielded only two convictions for in-person voter impersonation fraud out of 20 million votes cast in the decade leading up to SB 14’s passage.
Voter ID is fairly obviously a solution in search of a problem. As reasonable as it may seem, voter impersonation just doesn’t seem to happen often enough to justify even small negative impacts on voters’ ability to cast a ballot. The ruling notes that multiple plaintiffs in the case did, in fact, get turned away from the polls and were unable to cast a ballot or were unable to cure a provisional ballot in time. How many voters being denied their right to vote because they were unable to obtain the required ID is acceptable to balance two convictions for voter impersonation in a ten-year period out of millions of votes cast?
The court noted that the law was passed with many deviations from regular procedure and sponsors of the bill would not address why they denied many amendments proposed to reduce the impact of the bill on those that didn’t have the few forms of ID accepted. They also shifted explanations of the purpose when challenged, such as when the explanation of preventing non-citizens from voting was countered by how two of the forms of ID accepted were available to non-citizens.
Voter information and education – One of the main reasons why so many fewer absentee ballots were rejected in many states in 2020 than in the past was that so much effort was made to inform voters of the procedures. Making sure that voters understand how to cast a ballot legally and that won’t get rejected for procedural errors should be a high priority. Do we see efforts by legislatures on that point that match their efforts to crack down on the fraud that they believe exists or could exist?
Voter registration lists – we see in the news a lot about efforts to “clean up” voter registration rolls, but what efforts have their been to make the system work better between states and local jurisdictions?
Objections that ID is difficult to obtain are dishonest. Everyone has ID. You cannot function without it. Even homeless people have ID.
Even illegal immigrants who are not allowed to work have ID.
It is a silly objection.
Like many people you seem utterly ignorant of "ID" - you post as though any ID is good ID.
In reality, not only are most forms of ID not acceptable but in some states the GOP deliberately chose ID criteria that biased against Democratic voters and in favour of GOP voters. IIRC in Texas, state-issued IDs to students and government workers were not acceptable, CCW IDs were acceptabl
Not many people here likely to taken in by SRG's intentionally deceptive comment, but just in case:
The actual Texas law (super easy to Google) allows voters without ID to present "a current utility bill, government check, bank statement or paycheck, or government document with your name and an address."
Note that the registration card - automatically mailed every year to everyone registered to vote - is a government document with your name and address. Every person registered to vote gets sufficient ID mailed to them, for free.
Admittedly, there is a minor hitch: if it's not a secure form of ID, you have to sign a sworn statement that you are really you. Wonder why anyone would have a problem signing such a statement.
This is all readily available information, including at the polling place. If anyone has been misled into thinking they can't vote, it is most likely due to Democrats claiming it is hard to vote.
Jason, like most leftist, is a racist piece of shit.
"But the evidence before the Legislature was that in-person voting, the only concern addressed by SB 14, yielded only two convictions for in-person voter impersonation fraud out of 20 million votes cast in the decade leading up to SB 14’s passage."
I'm *barely* concerned with voter impersonation fraud. I am keenly concerned with people needing to demonstrate that they are legal residents of the state and districts they are trying to vote it. This is usually reflected in a valid photo ID that includes legal address information.
Having lived in ATL for many years, the number of people who claim to live there but never legally change their residency (often to avoid ATL car insurance rates). If you're holding onto a Florida DL and claiming FL residency for tax purposes, but living/working in ATL, where should you be allowed to vote? What would stop this person from requesting absentee ballot from FL and then walking into ATL polling place and voting there, too?
Similar to this clown claiming he was "disenfranchised"...
https://www.vice.com/en/article/8xjwmp/what-it-feels-like-to-be-disenfranchised-by-a-voter-id-law
Not to mention a keen desire to filter out illegal aliens from voting.
"Election designers have always considered mail in voting to be a fraud risk."
Do you have a citation for this statement.
This reveals his dishonest nature. Others have posted the Carter-Baker Commission Report which references combating fraud specifically in absentee voting. But because his only purpose is casting doubt he ignores those references to imply this is not well known.
In reality anyone who has paid any attention to the issue over the years understands that fraud is much easier when voter ID cannot be checked as is definitionally the case for mailed ballots.
I am aware of the Carter-Baker report, but that report was 17 years ago, and it did not call for eliminating mail-in voting but rather increased security. That increased security has happened and so the reports concerns were addressed. I see it hauled out far too often with no accounting for changes made.
Provide me a cite. No, not that cite!
Carter-Baker took a generally dim view of mail-in voting and recommended a number of security-enhancing actions that should be taken, like signature verification.
Of course, those actions were expressly ignored in 2020.
E.g., The state of Georgia arbitrarily changed state law on signature verification of absentee ballots via a March 2020 judicial consent decree with Georgia Democrats — without ever going to the state legislature. It changed the statutory requirement that the signature must match the signature on the voter registration card to simply matching the signature on the absentee ballot application. The March 2020 consent decree removed the requirement that the signature on the ballot match the voter registration card.
E.g., The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania relaxed controversial verification rules for the processing of mail-in ballots last week in a decided victory and boon for voting rights advocates. The decision also short-circuits a voting access lawsuit already in progress. The only expressly noted situation in which a voter’s signature declaration can be deemed insufficient, according to the memo, is an instance in which there is no signature contained in the declaration area whatsoever.
that report was 17 years ago,
Again we see how they flail about when their irrelevancies are pointed out. A process weakness does not change because of the passage of time.
That increased security has happened
This is an interesting misdirection. Leftists are eliminating every security measure falsely labelling them “voter suppression”, so the existence of this security is exactly the issue. In reality removing signature verification serves no purpose other than suborning fraud. But our fake moderate argues that these security measures are strong enough to prevent fraud so we can eliminate them.
It’s ridiculous when you spell it out clearly.
suborning
+2 - Nice vocab
Hi reason. Thank you for an article about how literally everything you said about the Georgia bill was wrong.
Are you all going to start owning up to the retardation, and lies that spew from your progtards mouths, and replace it with actual journalism and principled libritarian arguments? Haha I kid
Shade-equity:
FYI, these are the very same people that have adopted "libertarian upzoning" ideas.
The Seattle city council also believes pressure washers are racist…..
https://us24news.com/2019/08/27/seattle-officials-propose-to-human-crap-from-sidewalks-but-councilman-says-power-washers-are-racist/
I think this was discussed here when it made the wire services in 2019.
Trump famously insisted for months that mail-in voting was ripe for fraud despite no evidence to support his contention.
Mail-in voting is different than absentee voting. If you journalismed correctly, you'd know that.
Mail-in voting is different than absentee voting.
How is it different? I guess Florida doesn't have absentee voting, since its system is called "Vote-by-mail."
Absentee ballots are traditionally for people who cannot come to the polls. People in the military stationed overseas, or people who are housebound for health reasons. You must request a ballot with a reason, and in the case when I voted that way, you were required to have a sworn witness countersigning your envelope to prove you were the one filling out your ballot.
Vote by Mail as it exists in the last decade or two is completely different. In many cases everyone receives a ballot. The problems are obvious. It breaks the secret ballot, so unions can enforce their voting choices. So can employers. Interlopers can intercept and return ballots en mass.
It is such an obvious path to corrupting elections that proposing it simply raises questions about the intentions of the proposal.
Vote by Mail as it exists in the last decade or two is completely different.
Very little of what you said would distinguish the procedures for Vote by Mail that from what you call absentee voting. The primary difference being the need for a valid reason in absentee voting.
"In many cases everyone receives a ballot."
This is only true in, what, 3 or 4 states? One of which is solid Republican Utah, by the way. I wouldn't call that "many cases." In every other state, people have to request mail ballots.
Clearly, Georgia's voting law has issues: The ability of the state to directly meddle in counties' election boards is a fundamentally illiberal exercise of power, and based on the timing, it seems obvious that the law was intended to placate Trump's ego.
What was all that jiggery-pokery that Time Magazine bragged about? Just well-intentioned people making democracy safe again?
What the hell was I thinking? That was “election fortification”. This is... election de-fortificationifying.
"Erection fornication" what?! 😀
I kind of wish they'd make every person who writes for article just do a 5 page article listing their beliefs. Maybe Joe Lancaster is arguing for radical subsidiarity, something Reason has argued against otherwise when municipalities implement rules Reason disagrees with.
Not having that, I find that line annoying though. Elections are run by states, and this is not that radical of an regulation of county and local handling of election results.
I kind of wish they’d make every person who writes for article just do a 5 page article listing their beliefs.
That certainly would make it easier for you to accept or reject someone's views without having to actually think about their arguments or examine the reasoning or facts behind them.
Or, perhaps, the state needs to have a mechanism to hold certain counties accountable when they repeated have long lines, technical issues, poorly managed vote counts, and missing chains of custody. The state is the ultimate authority that has to certify their votes and declare electors, not the county or municipality.
Moreover, when people in those areas complain about long lines or delays, they claim the state is suppressing them and generally fail to blame their local officials.
Moreover, when people in those areas complain about long lines or delays, they claim the state is suppressing them and generally fail to blame their local officials.
Maybe the long lines and delays are intended and local officials are hamstrung in their efforts to reduce those things by state laws. That's a possibility, right?
We saw this in Florida. I live in Broward County, one of the three big democrat strongholds, run by New York city metropolitan area refugees. They brought their political machine structures with them.
In Broward we had the same election supervisor from the 2000 fiasco for 20 years. In 2000 it was days before the votes were counted.
We replaced the ballots with those standardized test bubble things. You fill in the little oval, and scan your ballot on the way out.
We still were the last in the country to report the vote. Even though the rest of the state was reporting within an hour of the polls closing, the Democrat stronghold was still taking all night. Which was strange, since the votes are tallied by computer as they are cast.
So...
Ron DeSantis replaced Brenda Snipes for incompetence. Magically, all of the problems evaporated. The very next election, Broward reported their results on time with the rest of the state. And magically the state went from very purple to solidly red.
But, you know, no evidence... Cleanest election ever...
Waiting to count your votes until after the other party reports their totals *is* evidence that you are up to no good. Florida and Ohio fixed their late reporting issues and suddenly their elections became much more clear.
In Georgia, our equivalent to that are Fulton County and DeKalb county. Cobb County is directly adjacent to those and very urban and also had huge problems in 2020. It went from pretty solidly red a decade ago, to purple in 2016, to deep blue in 2020. It seems like every area that turns blue adjacent to Atlanta starts having Atlanta problems with elections.
Does Joe understand that counties are subservient entities to the state? They aren’t like mini-states inside a state inside the federal jurisdiction.
Jesus Christ.
President Joe Biden called the law "Jim Crow in the 21st Century."
It made Jim Crow look like Jim Condor, or something.
In fact, the law merely stipulates that polls must stay open between at least 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., with the option of going as long as 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. It also states that polling locations must be open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. on at least two Saturdays prior to election day.
That's pretty cool.
The law did not end absentee ballots, though, somewhat cravenly, it did limit the reasons a person could request one and cut the time period in which one could request an absentee ballot from six months to less than three.
Three whole months...
In addition to sharply narrowing who can request absentee ballots, it significantly curtails the number of ballot drop boxes a county is allowed to have.
So use one of those Saturdays. I've never had the opportunity to vote on a Saturday.
In the months after the law passed, it remade entire counties' election boards by replacing Democrats with Republicans.
That's good. Democrats will stop at nothing to win. Republicans would never cheat. Ever.
But by hyperbolically characterizing the bill as an outright assault on voting rights akin to the racist laws and practices of the past, opponents papered over its more pernicious aspects.
Polls must be open for two Saturdays before the election? Shit. I think that eliminates the "I can't do it on a Tuesday" excuse while also not requiring a mail-in ballot. Genius. I like it.
The article didn't mention counties can also have voting on a Sunday, it's up to the local counties to decide if they want to allow Sunday voting. The large metro Atlanta counties do offer Sunday voting.
did LC1789 die? I miss the unbridled wave optimism
I figure he refused the vaccine, then got sick and died.
I refused the vaccine and increased my bench press 90%
*snort*
I squat Fords.
Edit: That might have come out wrong.
and ladies ... you'll like it too
I can just about bench press a bus. But I’ve always been that way.
The vaccine that Pfizer admitted wasn't even tested to see if it provided immunity.
did LC1789 die? I miss the unbridled wave optimism
After Trump lost he stopped eating then crawled under the house and later died.
Think he migrated over to glibertarians at some point.
Danchenko didn't lie, he just made up a bunch of shit about Trump that he didn't realize Christopher Steele would actually use, and the media would uncritically run with!
You see, it was all just a big misunderstanding. Sullum and the rest of the Reason staff can finally breathe easy.
Prosecutors said that if Danchenko had been more honest about his sources, the FBI might not have treated the dossier so credulously.
Ridiculous. We knew within a month the accusations in the Steele Dossier was characterized as bar stories. Dems and the FBI carried on pretending the stories were legitimate for years, nothing was ever going to deter them from their propaganda.
You just can't rely on the GOP for a good fake scandal anymore.
LOL
So Mr. Buttplug what's the latest on #TrumpDocuments? You know, that scandal most of us only learned about a couple months ago but which you knew back in May 2021 would lead to Trump's imprisonment?
#WallsClosingIn
I know, you're still struggling with the fact that the Steele Dossier was fake. Most of the rest of the solar system acknowledged and moved past that.
He was too busy serially jacking it to kiddie porn and grooming little boys to process that news.
Kinda like that accidentally posting kiddie porn fake scandal, huh?
Just like what's his name that got the ball rolling. Sussman?
ABC reports that in Penna. mail in ballots have been requested by 4 Democrats for every 1 Republican. Could this be laziness, lack of conviction, afraid of Covid- spreading vax deniers, or what????
They don't want to have to vote against Uncle Fester in public.
Uncle Fester would be a far better candidate. Or better yet, Wednesday.
Are they as old as their physical appearance indicates, or are they undead abominations who have existed for centuries? That's an important question for meeting the age qualifications.
These days you don't even need voters, just their ballots.
Has Kemp conceded yet?
He may as well with Donnie supporting Stacey Abrams.
"it significantly curtails the number of ballot drop boxes a county is allowed to have."
This is a twisted way of looking at it. Prior to the COVID panic and the corresponding unprecedented and illegal use of drop boxes, Georgia did not allow counties to have ANY drop boxes.
So, in fact, the law actually increases the number of drop boxes a county can legally provide, up from 0. The actual legal number may be lower than the number of illegal drop boxes seen in COVID era.
"The ability of the state to directly meddle in counties' election boards is a fundamentally illiberal exercise of power"
The primary function of this power would be to force local boards to fix their broken systems or be removed. Looking at you Fulton County. Fulton County is always held up as being the poster child for election problems with long lines and too-few polling places, not enough machines, people being turned away or giving up standing in line, etc. All of which are a direct result of Fulton County's board decisions. Adjacent Cobb County suffers from none of the problems Fulton has.
The increase in Georgia early voting is probably due to South Fulton and Dekalb blacks rushing to vote for Herschel because they relate to his gangsta-thug wife-beating child-abandonment bad-ass self. The GOP has finally figured out how to attract the A-A vote.
Now and then you see what people really think.
But most of the Blacks who would vote for him for those reasons can't vote because they're felons.
You've got racism stuck to the bottom of your shoe.
You and Warnock are kindred spirits in the child predator sense.
If they want a wife-beater, there's multiple options in the senate race.
Wow. What a remarkably racist comment from the progressive section of the commenters here. It's almost like the left is what they claim to fight against. Hmmmm.
They call themselves “progressives” and “anti-racists”, they called Georgia’s updated voting laws Jim Crow 2.0.
In reality, they are base human beings, simply filled with venom and racist vitriol to be turned on anyone with whom they disagree.
Here’s a smattering of things that MSNC hosts, Washington Post and The Nation writers, and other candidates for office have said about Herschel Walker, who is running for a Senate seat to represent Georgia (against incumbent Raphael Warnock).
Imagine for one second if Fox News or the WSJ had written these statements about Mr. Warnock.
“Herschel Walker’s candidacy is a white insult to Black people.”
“Walker is what they think of us, and they think we’re big, ignorant, and easily manipulated. They think we’re shady or criminal. They think we’re tools to be used. The Walker campaign exists as a political minstrel show: a splashy rendition of what white Republicans think Black people look and sound like.”
“I make a hard distinction between Black conservatives and these tokens” – referring to Senator Tim Scott (R-SC) and Walker – “who are out here right now, shucking and jiving for their white handlers.”
“Walker has positioned himself into being a useful fool for those who don’t have the best interests of Black people or this democracy at heart.”
“[Herschel Walker’s] irrelevant to the Black community, and we should treat him as such.”
“Herschel Walker, the football star turned Georgia Senate candidate, is an animated caricature of a Black person drawn by white conservatives.”
“Most white people in the South vote ‘R’ like their entire white supremacist project depends on it.”
“Georgia Republicans want Walker because he’s Black and Warnock is Black, and they think they can defeat Warnock in November if they can shave just a little of the Black vote…”
“Mr. Walker was merely a vessel for the G.O.P. and Mr. Trump’s ambitions.”
“He’s a puppet on a string, and somebody’s pulling those strings really good.”
And Warnock supporters heckling Walker:
“He’s a joke. He tap dances, and he’s a house n*****.”
Not to be outdone in using racist attacks against blacks, the Democrats seem intent on racist attacks on Hispanics, too.
Democratic lawmakers and liberal media outlets alike have responded to the Republican Party's gains with Latino voters by attacking Hispanic Republicans. Flores's opponent in November, Rep. Vicente Gonzalez (D., Texas), argued in June that he is more qualified than Flores because he "wasn't born in Mexico." Weeks later, Arizona representative Rubén Gallego (D.) said a female Hispanic Republican running for Congress in the state was not sufficiently Latina because she took her husband's last name.
The New York Times, meanwhile, said Flores's win marked the "Rise of the Far-Right Latina," citing the Republican's support for religiosity, strong borders, and traditional values. A Texas political blog that has received campaign funds from Gonzalez also attacked Flores last month, referring to the congresswoman as "Miss Frijoles," "Miss Enchiladas," and a "cotton pickin' liar."
"Who does this Mayra Flores think she is? Somebody said she was crowned Miss Frijoles 2022 in San Benito," Texas political blogger Jerry McHale, who has received $1,200 from Gonzalez's campaign, wrote on July 2. "She isn't in congressman Vicente Gonzalez's league. She isn't even in the bush leagues unless she doesn't shave her p**sy."
Just when I thought you couldn’t prove any better what a giant piece of shit human you are, you out racist Tony and Jason.
Peter Bogosian: All things reconsidered. Stories of why NPR listeners became former NPR listeners.
One of the better comments from someone who had an associate who worked at NPR: The Teen Vogue-ification of NPR.
tl:dr?
Not going to spend an hour listening to people prattle, but I'm guessing I know what the point is.
Fucking NPR isn't even listenable on a weekend afternoon, when they used to have strange and silly shows. In fact, I was driving to the other side of the city Saturday, a 35-40 minute trip, and thinking "Man, I sure miss Live from Here when I'm on the freeway on a Saturday evening".
7 Ways the 2005 Carter-Baker Report Could Have Averted Problems With 2020 Election
"They called on states to increase voter ID requirements; to be leery of mail-in voting; to halt ballot harvesting; to maintain voter lists, in part to ensure dead people are promptly removed from them; to allow election observers to monitor ballot counting; and to make sure voting machines are working properly.
They also wanted the media to refrain from calling elections too early and from touting exit polls.
All of this may sound eerily similar to the issues in the prolonged presidential election battle of 2020. But these were among the 87 recommendations from the 2005 report of the bipartisan Commission on Federal Election Reform, known informally as the Carter-Baker Commission.
The bipartisan commission’s co-chairmen were former Democratic President Jimmy Carter and former Secretary of State James Baker, a Republican who served in the George H.W. Bush administration.
Reminder: The media is always lying and gaslighting.
We were told for years that GA was racist and voter suppression was happening.
Its been ranked one of the easiest places to vote, for people of ALL skin colors, if you could believe it.
Its almost like they were trying to hide behind race, yet again.
Voter suppression is non-existent. Voter fraud is likely more common than we know. Despite record black early voting turnout, Abrams lost last time, and will lose again....
And Im sure we will hear 10 ways racism happened anyways
>Its been ranked one of the easiest places to vote,
You got a cite for that ranking?
Wouldn't mind a link to share with people I want to annoy now and again.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/washington-secrets/list-georgia-among-easiest-states-to-vote-in-better-than-delaware-ny
"List: Georgia among 'easiest' states to vote in, better than Delaware and New York"
"While critics have called recent reforms in the state “racist” and an effort to limit minority voting, the Center for Election Innovation and Research found that Georgia is among the 36 states with the easiest rules."
"A new nonpartisan evaluation of 2022 election laws has named Georgia as one of the easiest states to vote early in"
Also, what was it again? Jim Crow 2.0? Jim Eagle? Jim mega-falcon?
Funny that record numbers of black voters have had zero issues casting their ballots.
Impossible - black people are incapable of getting an id.
Oh no not record numbers of black voters. What a giant mistake Democrats made in their characterizations.
It's funny that you thought this a pithy response.
Sad Tony. Just sad.
My biggest complaint about Democrats is that they aren't nearly as Machiavellian as you think they are.
It’s Jim Albatross. Come on’ man!
" remade entire counties' election boards by replacing Democrats with Republicans."
Are we to take it that Republicans are less ethical that Democrats or is this a change that does nothing. One or the other.
I made over $700 per day using my mobile in part time. I recently got my 5th paycheck of $19632 and all i was doing is to copy and paste work online. this home work makes me able to generate more cash daily easily simple to do work and regular income from this are just superb. Here what i am doing.
Try now............>>> OnlineCareer1
"Clearly, Georgia's voting law has issues: The ability of the state to directly meddle in counties' election boards is a fundamentally illiberal exercise of power, and based on the timing, it seems obvious that the law was intended to placate Trump's ego. But by hyperbolically characterizing the bill as an outright assault on voting rights akin to the racist laws and practices of the past, opponents papered over its more pernicious aspects."
1. I disagree that the bill 'clearly has issues'.
2. Counties are subordinate units of state government. So, no, it's just an exercise of power, not an illiberal one.
3. Does placating Trump's ego matter here? And I disagree that the state GOP cares enough about the National GOP, let alone Trump to make law to placate his ego. Citation needed.
4. You haven't really described anything pernicious.
Also, what was it called when the state governments were changing election law in violation of their own legal procedures?
Regardless of what one thinks of the law, it would be 100% within journalistic standards to describe the intentions of the GOP as "good".
Trump anti-Semitic history:
Tweeting Hillary Clinton’s face next to a Star of David and the words “Most Corrupt Candidate Ever”
Closing his 2016 campaign with an ad that included the images of three Jewish people—George Soros, Janet Yellen, and Lloyd Blankfein—while warning that a secretive “global power structure” is to blame for economic policies that have “robbed our working class“ and “stripped our country of its wealth”
Waiting to condemn the neo-Nazi violence in Charlottesville, Virginia and then saying there were “very fine people on both sides” of a white supremacist rally in which marchers carried Nazi signs and chanted things like “Jews will not replace us”
Calling Jews who didn’t vote for him dumb and/or traitors
Declaring in a speech that Jewish voters “don’t even know what they’re doing or saying anymore”
Suggesting that Jews only care about money
Baselessly suggesting that Soros, a favorite bogeyman among white nationalists and neo-Nazis, was funding migrant caravans
Hosting a White House Hanukkah party that featured an evangelical pastor who once said Jews are going to hell
Telling a room full of Jewish people that Jews are “brutal killers” and “not nice people at all”
Suggesting Jews control the media
Saying, after a phone call with Jewish lawmakers, that Jews are “only in it for themselves”
https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/10/donald-trump-jews-israel-truth-social
The walls are closing in.
What was your objection to Ilhan Omar again?
Seems you don’t have a problem with her. So why do you have a problem with Trump’s anti-Semitism?
I don't understand antisemitism. I've only ever known intelligent, nice Jews. It probably has to do with me taking no part in the ridiculous cock-measuring contest between children's fairy tales this world so seems to turn on.
I don't like her that much, but she's only somewhat to the left of me and perhaps unhelpfully sincere about the brutal right-wing state of Israel. Donald Trump, by contrast, is literally the worst criminal in American history.
We all do our banking over the internet. We can vote over the internet. Anything else is shenanigans.
And I am glad if Democrats are exaggerating. Some voters are highly motivated when they feel their right to vote is being curtailed. If Democrats are highly motivating voters, it's evidence they have at least some political skill.
"We all do our banking over the internet. We can vote over the internet."
One of those things requires an extreme amount of proof of ID (often SS number and driver's license), and the other one is labeled as racist for requiring as little as a voter registration.
Try being logically consistent and honest for once. Or did you want elections to have all the security of a random internet poll?
Tony is correct here. People do so many things over the internet these days, bank, pay bills, get medical advice and yet people say could never do voting. It is simply illogical.
And if the democrats want to start behaving like adults, maybe thats a conversation we can have in the future.
But in the current state? Where even the thought of voter ID (which almost every country uses) is racist against blacks? Ya, no, that pretty much guarantees you CANT do online voting. As I stated before, banking apps, investments etc require usually SS, driver's license, and you to set up 2 factor authorization.
So we cant at the same time say that requiring black people to present a driver's license and be registered to vote is racism, but requiring them to do a much more cumbersome multistep, multi ID check, multi verification (requiring internet connection and cell phone) would be just fine.
Unless you intend not to have those cumbersome steps as part of the process. In which case, it would be extremely susceptible to fraud.
What you are missing is that many of the things you list are accepted as required to vote. No one is questioning that an individual's need an ID and proof of residence to register to vote. There are questions about IDs at the polls, but that a different matter. To vote electronically you would still need to register and that would require an ID and proof of residency, just like voting requires now.
BTW, in Wisconsin you can now use a printed electronic bill as proof of residency and don't need a mailed bill. So, there is a recognition that people are using the internet for bill paying.
If your concern is preventing voter fraud, then I offer you high-tech encryption, then you counter with some piece of plastic most teenagers figure out how to forge, then I think you just want to enact specific hindrances meant to target the vulnerable.
"Trump famously insisted for months that mail-in voting was ripe for fraud despite no evidence to support his contention."
Wow! Reason drank the Kool-Aid too. No evidence besides what 100,000 millions of Americans witnessed with their own eyes, hundreds of individual complaints by election workers, observers, and voters, and millions of hours of video evidence that True the Vote has presented. This is what Reason calls "no evidence".
Add to the "no evidence" Reason Magazine's complicity in overthrowing the American Republic.
Do you think you should be able to overturn election just because you complain enough? This has all been litigated to within an inch of Trump's online donation money.
What the American people see is people willing to say there was fraud, make movie about fraud, but refuse to produce evidence in a court of law. When you bring a case, produce evidence of fraud and win the case then you can claim fraud.
A lot of the complaints weren't about voter fraud, per se, but rather illegal counting of invalid-by-law ballots and irregular procedures that reduced the accountability and security of the election. It is true that some of those complaints were deemed moot, but a significant number of them were upheld but in such a fashion that the respective courts were not going to overturn election results. But they were clear that hundreds of thousands of ballots were illegally counted.
Wisconsin Supreme Court overruled its own election ruling:
II. The Majority's Error in Trump¶124Although the memos should not have the force of law, the majority erroneously concluded otherwise in Trump. In that case, Donald Trump, the incumbent President, and his campaign appealed the results of a recount in two Wisconsin counties. 394 Wis.2d629, ¶¶5–6 (majority op.). The ballots President Trump sought to strike fell into four categories; two are most relevant in this case.
The majority emphasized "local election officials used form EL-122 in reliance on longstanding guidance from WEC." Id., ¶25. Therefore, it concluded, "[p]enalizing the voters election officials serve and the other candidates who relied on this longstanding guidance is beyond unfair." Id."To strike ballots castin reliance on the guidance now, and to do so in only two counties, would violate every notion of equity that undergirds our electoral system." Id.In Trump, a majority of this court allowed its notions of "equity" and "unfair[ness]" to trump the law.
When the state's highest court refuses to uphold the law, and stands by while an unelected body of six commissioners rewrites it, our system of representative government is subverted." Id., ¶140 (Rebecca Grassl Bradley, J., dissenting). ¶129The holding in Trumprequires a votecast in reliance on a document produced by the WEC's staff to be counted even if the vote's counting is unlawful under the statute the staff purportedly interpreted. The majority did not ground its decision in constitutional law but in equity.
II. The Majority's Error in Trump¶124Although the memos should not have the force of law, the majority erroneously concluded otherwise in Trump. In that case, Donald Trump, the incumbent President, and his campaign appealed the results of a recount in two Wisconsin counties. 394 Wis.2d629, ¶¶5–6 (majority op.). The ballots President Trump sought to strike fell into four categories; two are most relevant in this case.
V. CONCLUSION29¶87Only the legislature may permit absentee voting via ballot drop boxes. WEC cannot. Ballot drop boxes appear nowhere in the detailed statutory system for absentee voting. WEC's authorization of ballot drop boxes was unlawful, and we therefore affirm the circuit court's declarations and permanent injunction of WEC's erroneous interpretations of law except to the extent its remedies required absentee voters to personally mail their ballots, an issue we do not decide at this time, and we decline to decide at this time whether the memos are also invalid as unpromulgated administrative rules.By the Court.——The judgment and order of the Circuit Court is affirmed.
The six-member commission referred to in the court document was created by the Republican controlled legislature to do specifically what it did in all elections since its creation. The fact is that most of the things reversed were things that were in place for many elections before and which were never challenged. No claims were made than votes were fraudulent before. There is no claim that any of the Wisconsin results are fraudulent other than the Presidential results. And the reason that the Wisconsin Supreme Court reversed itself was because one of the conservative Justices was not willing to let votes cast in good faith to be thrown out. That Justice was willing to allow the changes after the election. Laws cannot be made retroactive and so, the fact is that all votes cast in 2020 were legal.
"There is no claim that any of the Wisconsin results are fraudulent other than the Presidential results."
I never said they were fraudulent, I said they were legally invalid. An invalid ballot in invalid for all the races the voter cast a vote in. It just happened that Trump was the only one bringing the matter to court.
"Laws cannot be made retroactive and so, the fact is that all votes cast in 2020 were legal."
No, they were not. They were allowed to be counted, because the court ruled in error, as it admits. The LAWS were violated by the election committee's actions. The court allowed the invalid and illegal actions, knowing full well that they were invalid and illegal as the later ruling makes clear. This is not a case of laws being made retroactively, this was a case of allowing laws to be violated because of feelings. After the election was over and mooted, this ruling doubles back to make it clear what happened should never have happened.
Thus, thousands of votes in Wisconsin were invalid under the law, but allowed to have been counted. The same is true in other states were election officials changed procedures extra-legislatively (all part of COVID emergency, supposedly, of course).
There was the video of the ballot harvester in Ilhan Omar's district, where the guy gave a point-by-point explanation of how he was committing fraud. It was Project Veritas, though, so we pretend it doesn't exist.
I you really believe that it is evidence then take it to court.
Clearly you have no idea how litigation works, so your opinion on this matter is worthless.
Only because every Project Veritas video is a doctored piece of pro-Republican propaganda, which, unlike mass voter fraud, is something that has been demonstrated in court.
I find this article to be a bit disingenuous. True that the bill reads like a Republican wish list for voting that favors Republicans. However, the claim that "there was no voting fraud" because no evidence was found is also absurd. Say I place a $100 bill on a stool in the middle of a room with no people, no cameras, and no guard at the door...and then the bill is stolen. I can provide no evidence it ever existed much less that it was stolen...yet the possibility that it was in fact stolen does fact exist. Creating voting system designed to purposefully not allow for detecting fraud does not rule out fraud, it only rules out detecting and preventing fraud. Whether thats ballot harvesting or any number of other illegal (but undetectable) practices that blue state voting laws are essentially set up to allow with no way to detect or prevent it. So lets not be hypocrites...both sides play this game. Maybe the Dems play it better and less obvious...but they both do it, just like gerrymandering.
However, the claim that “there was no voting fraud” because no evidence was found is also absurd.
Not to mention, there was loads and loads of evidence, much of it documented on video. Just saying "no evidence" doesn't make it so.
Take that evidence to court.
I think we're just supposed to forfeit the election on their good word.
Mail-in voting is “ripe for fraud” for three reasons. Allow me to summarize them.
First, it vastly increases the number of hand-off points between a voter, their ballot, and the counting of that ballot. By “vastly increases” I mean we go from a simple three-step process — voter personally receives a ballot, fills it in, and deposits it into the voting tabulator — to once involving dozens of steps involving multiple election officials, multiple post office employees, and multiple sorting, distribution, and transportation machines, all before we even get to the voting tabulator.
Second, it is “ripe for fraud” because the chain of custody is broken several times. The US Post Office is not a guaranteed delivery service. When you put something into a US Mail drop box, it is indeed locked, but that lock is unattended and unsupervised for the vast majority of the day and night. When the mail is sorted and distributed, it is mixed with a flood of other mailed items, and no additional attention and supervision is given to ballots. Then when the mail is delivered to a residential mail box, it is rarely locked up, besides also being completely left open to the public, unattended and unsupervised. Then after the voter completes the ballot, the entire broken chain is repeated once again, only this time with a filled-in ballot.
Thirdly, if a mailed-in ballot is filled in incorrectly, then it is very difficult in the extreme to correct it in time. In many states, an incorrectly filled-in mailed ballot is simply not counted, period. A ballot cast in person, on the other hand, has a nearly perfect chance of being counted.
The lines of attack that can be exploited by this insecure process are as follows: you can more easily prevent a ballot from being counted when it is mailed versus cast in person; you can more easily substitute a ballot; and you can more easily impersonate a voter, because you’ve reduced the requirements for identifying the voter to just a signature.
These are just some of the highlights. It is beyond question that mailed-in ballots are more “ripe for fraud” than ballots cast in person. That is not a partisan statement, it is a statement of fact.
I disagree with your three points. First the ballot traveling through the mail is sealed and so protected from tampering. Examining the ballot envelope for tampering is part of the processing protocol for mail-in ballot. Ballots are also tracked from the time they are sent, and in many cases the voter can follow the ballots progress on-line. I could therefore see that my ballot is coming to me and its return to the clerk. Chain of custody is not a defined term but is rather determined by need. Postal delivery is widely accepted in many chain-of-custody protocols. You are correct that there are many steps in postal process and this would support wider use of drop boxes which have fewer processing steps as city clerk staff pick up the ballots. As for errors, some can still be corrected. A voter can be alerted to an error on the ballot certificate, the envelope, and can be asked to come in to correct the error. An error on the ballot cannot be corrected. I would suggest the voter has to accept this possibility when they chose to vote.
“ I disagree with your three points.”
Yes, but you’re an idiot.
To be honest, I don't trust postal carriers who are primarily union-members and thus most often in the bag for Democrats to faithfully collect and remit ballots. It's far too easy to just disappear ballots they might collect in heavy R areas (or from houses that have R signs out front). Unless a voter lives in a state with ballot tracking *and* makes the effort to check that the ballot was received and processed, such ballots would be presumed to have been discarded by the voter (by the election officials and the media). And no amount of recounts will correct that.
Assuming that your scenario would play out it would have to be by a very dumb mail carrier. The consequences for a mail carrier should they be discovered would be big when in fact they could likely only discard a few ballots. As you noted, many states have ballot tracking, and the postal worker would need to chance that no voter in a discarded ballot set would check. Any pattern of discarded ballots would stand out and would lead straight back to the postal worker.
I am happy to see that people are choosing to get out and vote early in Georgia. My own state of Wisconsin is reporting strong early voting, although not to the degree seen in 2020. Like many other things the pandemic provided people the opportunity to see a new and easier way to vote. Many people will continue this, and I hope we will see increased voter numbers in future election. Voter participation in democracy is critical and increasing participation is always good.
Voter participation in democracy is critical and increasing participation is always good.
Why?
Maybe you are in the wrong country. You might want one where a leader or small group of people run things. China, Iran, or North Korea might be more to your liking.
So not able to defend your sweeping generalization, then. Got it.
Because the more people participate, the more likely their government is to act according to the common interest.
I don't know what a poor black person in Georgia needs from government. Why do I have to take on the responsibility of figuring it out for them?
Georgia Sets Early Voting Record, Despite
ControversialWidespread Lies about Voting LawUnless chain of custody for ballots can be established there is no need to provide any evidence for the claim that it is "ripe for fraud". It just is. The real question is why the voting process was allowed to become so "ripe" in the first place.
There is a chain of custody, so your assertion is incorrect from the start. What are you trying to say? Is it that you don't like current chain of custody protocols used with ballots? If that is the case, then explain what it is that you want for an alternative chain of custody protocol.
I have more general rant about voting. Voting should NOT be easy. It should not be impossible, but it also shouldn't be easy. Seeing as the election of representatives can have deleterious effects on our freedoms, those who vote should really want to vote and know what the fuck they're doing. I'd go a step further and make all voting "write in". If you don't know who the fuck you're voting for before you enter the booth or filling out an absentee ballot, maybe you shouldn't be voting.
So at some threshold of ignorance, people stop deserving democratic representation and start deserving to be ruled.
How about a simple poll test: "Who won the 2020 presidential election?"
Glad I got out of that racist state Georgia, what with them passing these new racist election laws. Have you seen this law yet? You can't even hand out a bottle of water! Read the law and then I'll look at what this means further below.
Section 17-140 Furnishing money or entertainment to induce attendance at polls
Any person who directly or indirectly by himself or through any other person in connection with or in respect of any election during the hours of voting on a day of a general, special or primary election gives or provides, or causes to be given or provided, or shall pay, wholly or in part, for any meat, drink, tobacco, refreshment or provision to or for any person, other than persons who are official representatives of the board of elections or political parties and committees and persons who are engaged as watchers, party representatives or workers assisting the candidate, except any such meat, drink, tobacco, refreshment or provision having a retail value of less than one dollar, which is given or provided to any person in a polling place without any identification of the person or entity supplying such provisions, is guilty of a Class A misdemeanor.
Oh wait, silly me. That's the New York state election law that DOES THE SAME THING!
I've read the new law, and unless you're a racist who thinks black people are somehow incapable of having an approved ID or unable register to vote 78 days before an election, there's nothing it does that is anything close to "Jim Eagle" (WTH does that even mean?).
Some of the things it is getting called out on are just wrong.
It EXTENDS early voting, rather than cuts it, providing 3 weeks of early-in-person voting and requiring 2 (vs previous 1) Saturdays of early in-person voting. It EXTENDS permissible early voting hours while maintaining required hours.
It PROVIDES ballot drop boxes. Georgia did not permit drop boxes at all, except that they were permitted under the COVID emergency. Now they're legal, provided they meet certain requirements, mostly being safely ensconced in a government building and observable. Generally, there will be one ballot drop box at each early-voting site. Drop boxes must be processed by two people.
It does away with signature matching for disallowing absentee votes (it replaces with matching the ID provided). This should be a help for people who's signatures suffer due to medical issues (parkinsons, arthritis...).
It requires local election officials to monitor line lengths and duration of standing in line and requires changes to reduce both. Precincts with more than 2000 voters must hire additional staff or be split up. Also, at least one voting machine per 250 voters is required in each precinct. Metrics are going to be used used and the SecOfState is required to act (vs at discretion in old law).
It requires elections officials to send a registration card to anyone who requested an absentee ballot when not already registered. It requires provisional ballots in a number of circumstances (e.g. wrong precinct) when there were previously votes simply disallowed.
It sets up a hotline for people to report voter intimidation and other illegal election activities (like electioneering).
It allows elections officials to begin vetting ballots when they are received but not counting them.
It requires precincts to post the number of ballots cast in person early and on election day and absentee by 10PM on election day, providing the upper limit before counting votes begins. It also requires precincts to count non-stop and observable to monitors, with results required by 5PM the day after election day.
It DOES cut the absentee request from 180 days (6 months!) to 11 weeks (78 days). It DOES require an approved ID to request an absentee ballot. It DOES prohibit 3rd parties from printing and distributing absentee ballots and/or requests. It DOES require that absentee ballots be printed on security paper. It DOES prohibit local election boards from receiving "grants" from 3rd parties (except that such donations can now be made to the state and disbursed). It DOES shorten the runoff campaign period (when one is needed) from 9 weeks to 4 weeks.