Biden's Marijuana Pardons Could Benefit Some 10,000 People With Misdemeanor Records
That seemingly large number represents a tiny share of simple possession cases, which are rarely prosecuted under federal law.

The mass pardon for low-level marijuana offenders that President Joe Biden announced last week will affect nearly 7,000 U.S. citizens convicted of simple possession under federal law during the last few decades, according to an updated analysis that the U.S. Sentencing Commission (USSC) published yesterday. Within that group, 6,577 cases involved just marijuana, while 415 also involved other drugs, which are not covered by Biden's proclamation.
An additional 1,132 convictions, including 1,122 marijuana-only cases, involved noncitizens who were legally living in the United States. Within that group, Biden's proclamation is limited to "lawful permanent residents."
The USSC analysis covers FY 1992 through FY 2021. Biden's pardons apply to simple possession cases before and after that period, as long as the defendants committed the offense on or before October 6. The beneficiaries also include people convicted of simple possession under the District of Columbia Code. "Officials estimated that number to be in the thousands," The New York Times reports.
All told, then, the total number of beneficiaries may exceed 10,000, which nevertheless represents a tiny percentage of Americans with misdemeanor marijuana records, who typically are prosecuted under state law, not federal law. The Justice Department said it will "expeditiously administer the President's proclamation." Toward that end, "the Office of the Pardon Attorney will begin implementing a process to provide impacted individuals with certificates of pardon," thereby "restoring political, civil, and other rights."
Although simple marijuana possession is punishable by up to a year of incarceration under the Controlled Substances Act, the USSC reports that no one convicted of that offense remained in Bureau of Prisons custody as of January 29. Biden did not pardon people convicted of growing or distributing marijuana, about 8,700 of whom received federal sentences from FY 2017 through FY 2021. The average prison term during that period was 30 months, although a fifth of the defendants were sentenced to five years or more.
"Your recent executive order, while a great first step, did nothing to address the thousands of federal cannabis prisoners currently incarcerated in federal prison," 16 drug policy reform groups say in a letter they sent Biden on Monday. "While your recent executive order will help many, it will not release a single one of the nearly 2,800 federal cannabis prisoners." Although "eighteen states and the District of Columbia have legalized cannabis," the letter notes, "there are thousands of Americans who are serving long-term prison sentences, including some life sentences, in federal facilities for conduct involving amounts of cannabis that are far less than what dispensaries routinely handle on a daily basis."
In addition to drawing a morally dubious distinction between simple possession and other marijuana offenses, Biden's proclamation excludes noncitizens who are not legal permanent residents. The upshot, as Reason's Fiona Harrigan notes, is that even residents who are legally allowed to remain in the United States, such as refugees and asylum applicants, will still suffer from the ancillary penalties associated with marijuana misdemeanors, including vulnerability to deportation. Marijuana convictions also can exclude people from entering the country to begin with or prevent them from becoming citizens.
According to the USSC's analysis, about four-fifths of federal convictions for simple marijuana possession involved men. Forty-one percent of the defendants were white, while 32 percent were Hispanic and 24 percent were black.
Virginia accounted for 10 percent of the convictions, which presumably reflects the prevalence of federal property in that state. Border states also accounted for outsized percentages of the simple possession cases: The share was about 17 percent for Arizona, 15 percent for Southern California, and 12 percent for Texas. Those numbers reflect people caught with pot at the border.
As Reason's C.J. Ciaramella notes, a 2016 USSC report "found that most people charged by the feds with simple possession are either caught coming over the U.S.-Mexico border with small amounts, or caught on federal property, such as a military base, national park, or Veterans Affairs facility." These convictions account for a very small share of all simple possession cases, which are rarely prosecuted in federal court.
Since 1965, police in the United States have made nearly 29 million marijuana arrests, the vast majority for possession rather than cultivation or trafficking. Rep. Dave Joyce (R–Ohio), co-chair of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus, estimates that "more than 14 million cannabis-related records at the state and local level continue to preclude Americans from stable housing and gainful employment." Biden has no power to lift those burdens, although he urged governors to do so for people convicted of simple possession.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Although this amnesty was perfectly valid, I think it does too little and too much.
Too much, because since it applies to all offenses before the date of the pardon. What in practice will be the situation of those who are busted a day *after* the pardon? Politically speaking, will cops do any federal possession busts for offenses which just last week were the beneficiaries of amnesty?
It would have been better to pardon convictions which were older than, say, two years, so that people could be reminded that these laws are still on the books and the President has to carry them out (at least in federal enclaves where the 10th Amendment issues don’t apply).
Too little, because he should have pardoned those who today would have been able to act under state law. And started letting people with excessive sentences out of prison.
And he could have pulled out of the UN’s drug treaty, which provides the UN with a platform to promote pot prohibition among our people. Keep the UN’s nose out of our dope.
> What in practice will be the situation of those who are busted a day *after* the pardon?
Who gives a shit? That's after the election and the news cycle will have moved on by then.
We just need to buy them votes.
We don't actually want to fix the laws. I mean, that is obvious by the pork laden, poison-pill put forth as a bill the Republicans would never vote for when you could decriminalize Marijuana in a one page bill and get a crapload of support from both parties.
Hell, it's only two paragraphs and maybe a list or two, so one page and still have plenty of room for all the letterhead and logos and name of sponsors. Even then you'd have room to draw dicks in the margins. It's not that complicated if you don't try and institute a massive regulatory and tax framework in the same bill.
Pot should be as legal as potatoes. Whores should be, too. None of this "decriminalization" crap, just flat out "legal".
Though, fuck. There are undoubtedly regulations about potatoes as well.
I am making 80 US dollars per hr. to complete some internet services from home. I did not ever think it would even be achievable , however my confidant mate got $13k only in four weeks, easily doing this best assignment and also she convinced me to avail.
For more detail visit this site.. http://www.Profit97.com
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, I’m now creating over $35400 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! I do know You currently making a (ad-03) lot of greenbacks online from $28000 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link——————–>>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
I'm not talking about what should be.
I'm talking about what Congress would do. Or not do, in this case. If they were serious, they could make it happen, period.
They are not serious. They are just looking for wedge issues, to try and make it look like Republicans are the nazis outlawing weed or whatever. Counting on the fact that Biden voters are too stupid to google his comments on why we should incarcerate more people, for longer, because they are beyond redemption and should be removed from society.
Yes we know. Even when Biden does something accidentally right, it must be spun into a narrative that Biden is still evil.
I mean, we were all hectored for 4 years about "WHY WON'T YOU GIVE TRUMP CREDIT FOR THE GOOD THINGS HE DOES? HUH????" but when Biden does something good, instead it's "HE'S STILL AN EVIL ASSHOLE". Huh.
^Not a lefty.
Too little, because...
He could, a la bump stocks, nearly or completely deschedule anything and everything he likes or even, say, completely re-orient the scheduling around useful amount vs. toxic amount, simply using a pen and a phone.
And that's despite Reason's structured opposition/eating catfishing bait about 'not enough research'. Entire families of drugs on the list with as-yet-undiscovered members set to go on without the slightest bit of research simply because they look like their siblings. Same entire families of drugs on the list despite several members having no demonstrable harm, potential for abuse, and valid medical use. But Reason's totally not simping for Biden when they publish an article lamenting how marijuana *could* be rescheduled, if only it had more research done on it.
He could, a la bump stocks, nearly or completely deschedule anything and everything he likes or even, say, completely re-orient the scheduling around useful amount vs. toxic amount, simply using a pen and a phone.
Precisely.
His party owns congress and the white house for fuck's sake. He's the executive, the people in the alphabet agencies who schedule these things and make these rules serve at his pleasure. He can very easily tell them to remove it from schedule I. Period. Again, there'd be enough room on that sheet of paper containing the the executive order for him to ... I dunno, doodle little hearts and write a poem about how that girl's hair smelled in the margin.
Herschel Walker says his grandmother was a "full-blooded Cherokee".
https://youtu.be/InB3Z08Zc88
So related to Lizzy Warren?
The slaves held by Native American tribes were made full members of the tribe that owned them after the Civil War. If you were not so racist and ignorant you would know that.
“full-blooded Cherokee”
That comes with heated leather seats, right?
Joe Biden only cares about himself.
“Nobody fucks with a Biden” (he really said this)
https://pjmedia.com/culture/megan-fox/2022/10/13/watch-hundreds-of-muslims-shut-down-school-board-meeting-over-lgbtq-book-controversy-n1636713
So when hundreds of Muslim parents, upset at gay porn in the school libraries, showed up to a school board meeting in Dearborn, Mich., and it devolved into shouting and chaos with board members running away and gay protesters being chased to their cars, the fallout was absolutely hilarious. The headline in the Detroit Free Press after the event went haywire was “LGBTQ and Faith Communities Struggle for Unity.” BAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
Muslims doing the work that Christians just won't do. This is the greatest story ever.
The irony here is that both groups are "Democrat protected groups". How long until the Muslims are considered "white oppressors"?
Either that or gays are considered Islamophobic bigots. It has to be one or the other.
For years the Dems got votes from manual laborers in the North and slaveholders in the South. Weird coalitions are what they do.
“LGBTQ and Faith Communities Struggle for Unity.”
ROFLMAO! This caps it off perfectly. It feels like one of those euphemisms that's too on-the-nose or a metaphor trying too hard to be a euphemism and winds up conveying the exact opposite effect. Like it's part of one-liner uttered by Frank Dreben.
-Like a Muslim woman at an LGBTQ Struggle Session I was going to have to keep my head down, mouth shut, and ass covered.
-She was so hot, but like an LGBTQ person at a Muslim Unity Session, I had to make sure I didn't wind up getting caught admiring the view.
Sullum, now this is what we call a political stunt.
Yes, it is a political stunt. Notably, only the stunts from the team that you like will get the full-court defense.
four-fifths of federal convictions for simple marijuana possession involved men.
Surely *something* must be done about such inequity.
Since 1965 ... nearly 29 million wheat arrests, majority for possession rather than cultivation or trafficking
would make same amount of sense.
But will they be eligible to vote in time for the midterms?
Hey: Biden’s doing something that actually doesn’t suck hard!
Let's make sure to give this wall-to-wall coverage since he and his handlers have fucked up literally everything else.
Pray tell, what have they fucked up?
Sources too please that aren't from the rightwingosphere.
Yeah, my bad. Everything is awesome, gas is cheap, prices are going down, we had a smooth exit from Afghanistan, we are not dependent on oil from fascist shitholes, our President is fully cognizant and has complete control of his bowels, the deficit is fine, and the Biden Administration isn't using the FBI and Justice Department as its own personal Gestapo. I was confused there for a minute.
Yes he has.
Of course it is a stunt to try to prevent the midterms to be the bloodbath for his team that they are very likely going to be. Based on his previous pro-Drug-War positions, he would never have considered such a thing had the polls not look so awful for Team Blue right now. But he deserves credit for doing something accidentally right even if it's for the wrong reasons.
And every single person who demanded that everyone ignore all of Trump's faults for 4 years and praise every single inkling of even a whiff of a pro-liberty thought from Trump's brain, even if he is the completely moronic amoral asshole that we all know him to be, to be consistent, must now, to be consistent, praise Biden for accidentally doing something right, even if he is a senile doddering old fool that we all know him to be.
But of course they won't.
All I know is that Biden has done this right and all the Republican governors and states have expressly said they won't issue pardons.
One side at least pretends to care about freedom. The other isn't afraid to get all up in your uterus or your ass and tell you how things need to be.