Biden's Marijuana Reforms Are Long Overdue but Will Have Just a Modest Impact
The president's mass pardon does not extend to pot suppliers, and his rescheduling plans won't make marijuana a legal medicine.

The marijuana reforms that President Joe Biden announced today follow through on some of the promises that he made during his campaign, but they will have a limited practical impact. His blanket pardon for low-level marijuana offenders, while long overdue, will affect a small percentage of people with federal drug records. Without new legislation, marijuana use will remain a crime under federal law, as will growing and selling marijuana. And while rescheduling marijuana will make medical research easier, it will not make cannabis legally available to patients unless and until the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves specific products as safe and effective.
"I think we should decriminalize marijuana, period," Biden said during a November 2019 presidential debate. "And I think…anyone who has a record should be let out of jail, their records expunged, be completely zeroed out….Everybody gets out, record expunged." The recovering drug warrior later qualified that broad language, suggesting his concern was limited to marijuana users charged with simple possession, who are rarely prosecuted under federal law. Today's announcement fits that narrower focus.
Biden said he is pardoning "all current United States citizens and lawful permanent residents who committed the offense of simple possession of marijuana in violation of the Controlled Substances Act." He said the blanket pardon would help "thousands of people who were previously convicted of simple possession" and "who may be denied employment, housing, or educational opportunities as a result." While "white and Black and brown people use marijuana at similar rates," he noted, "Black and brown people have been arrested, prosecuted, and convicted at disproportionate rates."
Biden's concern about the ancillary penalties associated with marijuana convictions and the racially disproportionate impact of the war on weed is welcome. So is his willingness to use his plenary clemency powers to address those problems. But nearly all low-level marijuana cases are prosecuted under state law, and his pardons will have no impact on those. Biden urged governors to "pardon simple state marijuana possession offenses," which would have a much broader effect but depends on their discretion.
To put the impact of Biden's mass pardon in perspective, about 400,000 people are currently incarcerated for drug offenses in the United States, including about 67,000 federal prisoners. During the last two decades, police typically made between 1.5 million and 1.9 million drug arrests every year. In recent years, marijuana arrests have accounted for more than a third of the total, and the vast majority of those cases (92 percent in 2019) involved possession rather than cultivation or trafficking.
"Since 1965," the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws notes, "nearly 29 million Americans have been arrested for marijuana-related violations." Rep. Dave Joyce (R–Ohio), co-chair of the Congressional Cannabis Caucus, says "more than 14 million cannabis-related records at the state and local level continue to preclude Americans from stable housing and gainful employment." Biden's estimate that his pardons will help "thousands of people" pales next to numbers like those.
Although Biden has said "we should decriminalize marijuana," he does not have the authority to do that on his own. Despite his pardons, simple marijuana possession is still punishable by a $1,000 fine and up to a year in jail under the Controlled Substances Act. Growing or selling marijuana are still federal felonies, which creates an untenable conflict with state laws that allow medical or recreational use. Cannabis consumers who own guns likewise are still subject to stiff prison sentences—a policy the Biden administration is defending in court.
Biden, who has long opposed efforts to repeal federal marijuana prohibition, made it clear today that he does not favor eliminating criminal penalties for growing or selling pot. His pardon announcement says "no language herein shall be construed to pardon any person for any other offense, including possession of other controlled substances, whether committed prior, subsequent, or contemporaneous to the pardoned offense of simple possession of marijuana."
The moral logic of Biden's distinction between simple possession and other marijuana offenses is hard to follow. He says using marijuana should not be treated as a crime. If so, how can helping people use marijuana justify sending anyone to prison? And why should people convicted of assisting cannabis consumption be saddled with felony records for the rest of their lives?
Biden did say "it makes no sense" to "classify marijuana at the same level as heroin." Both drugs are included in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, a category supposedly reserved for substances with a high abuse potential that have no accepted medical use and cannot be used safely even under a doctor's supervision. Biden noted that even fentanyl, black-market versions of which are implicated in two-thirds of drug-related deaths, is less strictly regulated than marijuana, because the federal government recognizes that it has legitimate medical applications.
Biden said he has asked Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra and Attorney General Merrick Garland to "initiate the process of reviewing how marijuana is scheduled under federal law." That administrative process is apt to take a while, and its consequences are uncertain.
Removing marijuana from Schedule I would require changing the criteria that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) historically has applied in determining whether marijuana has a "currently accepted medical use." The DEA has long demanded the sort of evidence that would be required to win FDA approval for a new drug. The DEA's critics, meanwhile, have long complained that keeping marijuana in Schedule I makes it harder to conduct the research necessary to satisfy that requirement.
Rescheduling marijuana would eliminate the research barriers that are unique to Schedule I. But by itself, it would not make cannabis available as a prescription drug, which would require FDA approval of a specific application. So far, the FDA has approved synthetic THC as an anti-nausea medication and cannabidiol as a treatment for epilepsy. Except for the latter, it has never approved a cannabis-derived medicine.
"Too many lives have been upended because of our failed approach to marijuana," Biden said today. "It's time that we right these wrongs." Given the narrow reach of the policies he just announced—which leave marijuana prohibition untouched, do not allow even medical use, and keep marijuana growers and distributors in prison—his reforms represent only a modest step in that direction.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
While "white and Black and brown people use marijuana at similar rates," he noted, "Black and brown people have been arrested, prosecuted, and convicted at disproportionate rates."
Skin color is the most important thing
In only 5 weeks, I worked part-time from my loft and acquired $30,030. In the wake of losing my past business, I immediately became depleted. [res-01] Luckily, I found this occupations on the web, and subsequently, I had the option to begin bringing in cash from home immediately. Anybody can achieve this tip top profession and increment their web pay by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE:>>> https://extradollars3.blogspot.com/
I just worked part-time from my apartment for 5 weeks, but I made $30,030. I lost my former business and was soon worn out. Thank goodness, I found this employment online and I was able Haa to start working from home right away. This top career is achievable by everyone, and it will improve their online revenue by:.
.
EXTRA DETAILS HERE:>>> https://jobopportunity22.blogspot.com
Most federal prosecutions are rated to amounts tied to trafficking or plea deals down from other crimes.
Very rare is the case for personal use pot.
But Sullum is woke now, so this was his angle.
Great article, Mike. I appreciate your work, i’m now creating over $35200 dollars each month simply by doing a simple job online! i do know You currently making a lot of greenbacks online from $28100 dollars, its simple online operating jobs
Just open the link-------------------->>> https://smart.online100.workers.dev/
More blacks are arrested for murder. Will Biden use race as justification to pardon all murders?
The Republican Platform brags that "leadership" could restore Harry Anslinger's approach to marijuana and keep heroin killing: "...batting Drug Abuse
The progress made over the last three decades against drug abuse is eroding, whether for cultural reasons or for lack of national leadership. In many jurisdictions, marijuana is virtually legalized despite its illegality under federal law. At the other end of the drug spectrum, heroin use nearly doubled from 2003 to 2013, while deaths from heroin have quadrupled."
Oh yeah, there is a “lack of national leadership”, so I think I will buy some drugs.
More the lack of a consistent message that the stuff is bad for you. I've always supported legalization but I've seen an explosion of teenage and younger marijuana use here in Washington since it was legalized for adults, including reports of parents smoking pot with their kids. I assumed there would be more adult use but hadn't anticipated the sheer volume of increase in underage use. I am starting to wonder whether legalization really was a good idea.
We can't even talk about disparate racial outcomes—due to government—anymore without offending your delicate fucking sensibilities?
Political correctness is ever-present on both sides. Conservatives are just the ones who end up building camps to enforce theirs.
Like Democrat FDR's Japanese internment camp?
I’m not the one offended.
It’s a consistent tactic of Tony to make up bullshit to make any point. The sad thing is he believes he’s fooling anyone.
Conservatives are just the ones who end up building camps to enforce theirs.
It is so bizarre when left wingers act as if their fantasies were true.
So my experience here is the "white" people of any color will "hide" their drugs and be polite to get the cops moving while the black culture folks will blow MJ smoke at the cop and dare them to make the arrest giving attitude at every turn. Neither should be necessary for MJ but pretending to comply with pretending to enforce because nobody is at risk is the safer and cost free action.
Sullum is proving the old adage "libritarians are just virtuesignaling leftists that just want to smoke pot"
That's a lie,Coloreds use it much more and more indiscriminately-they don't even consider it a drug.They were more enlightened than our lawmakers.
Biden is looking for votes via a bait and switch. He promised "I think we should decriminalize marijuana, period" instead he's keeping the prison incarceration complex employed, and making pot sellers subject to jail. That's not decriminalization.
If he moves marijuana off schedule 1 - which he has to do in order for the FDA to even look at it as medicine - then it's a win.
Yeah, not gonna make a dent in fed prison population - most of who are in for dealing - but not nothing either.
At this point there's only one object to getting it licensed as medicine by FDA: insurance reimbursement. Medical mj will soon be a done deal in every state regardless.
Guess this still isn't a political stunt in the 2nd article either. This changes no future laws. So what's the fucking point? 6500 people for a PR advert.
Guess I'll wait for Sullums article on Hunter and his crimes.
Do you mean the crime of Republicans pouncing on a poor victim and his crack habit, hookers, incest and political influence pedaling for dear old dad?
You bring to mind Senate candidate Federman, who shows his compassion for violent criminals, by voting to release them on probation. He felt so sad for the guy who killed a woman by stabbing her in the chest with some scissors, that he voted to release him from jail.
Oh here comes king snowflake ready to bitch about it anyhow.
Tell me, when did your fuhrer do a gd thing about it? But Biden does but somehow "libertarians" like you still bitch.
Removing marijuana from Schedule I would require changing the criteria that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) historically has applied in determining whether marijuana has a "currently accepted medical use."
I don't recall that the Drug Enforcement Act has a provision in it for rescheduling drugs based on what the DEA thinks about it or says about it. It simply leaves rescheduling up to the Attorney General. The DEA can fuck off. Just like every other Executive Branch agency, they are not actually a constitutionally-empowered fourth branch of government able to create their own laws, even if Congress refuses to do their job and allows these fuckers to have free rein to trample our rights. This is the Deep State that doesn't exist, the permanent bureaucracy that doesn't give a shit what their "bosses" tell them to do, they do what they want.
Sullum makes up facts and uses them to drive opinions. He’s just a joke anymore.
Congress entirely handed the authority to develop lists of controlled drugs to DEA, with the caveat that HHS and FDA will be looked to for the science. (Congress did the same for environmental substances delegated to EPA but it does not have to look to outside science authorities). Obama ordered review of MJ in 2015. DEA opened a comment period for revising the listing. FDA shot it down, so no change.
The AG may have a role, but the hoops laid out by Congress and APA is written in stone.
The thing is, the FDA, DEA, DOJ - these are all executive agencies under the president, that are interpreting the law passed by congress, and setting their own policies based on their interpretations.
That's exactly the sort of thing that an executive order could fix.
As opposed to, say, cancelling half a trillion dollars in student loan debt.
Of course, congress could always step up and pass a bill to update their intent and/or clarify the law. But very few of them seem interested in doing anything like that.
Andy Borowitz's take:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FealbU0UcAAgsOs?format=jpg&name=large
Half-assed satire. Seems like his norm.
I’m not knowledgeable about Federal prosecutors. Does it happen often or ever that a violent crime would be plead down to a possession charge to avoid trial?
Edit: Do the inmates who receive pardons regain voting and firearm rights?
1. Yes. Too often.
2. No. Pardons don't restore rights on their own.
His blanket pardon for low-level marijuana offenders, while long overdue, will affect a small percentage of people with federal drug records. Without new legislation, marijuana use will remain a crime under federal law, as will growing and selling marijuana. And while rescheduling marijuana will make medical research easier, it will not make cannabis legally available to patients unless and until the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves specific products as safe and effective.
Only a few years ago I would have warned you that safe AND effective would have been a high bar. Marijuana may be "safe" (although since lung cancer is caused by the mechanical irritation of the lung tissues by the smoke) I'm not convinced that marijuana can be proven "effective" for anything beyond some symptom mitigation- just like having a shot of whiskey might.
But these days, "safe AND effective"? Yeah, very loose rules on that.
Hey. The Covid vax is safe and effective. It is known. And it's still experimental.
We have zero long term health data on the Covid vaccines. NONE.
100% safe and effective with no downsides.
What is your definition of “long term”?
Caw caw!
Yes we do. 98 times worse than the desiese
More study is always good, but there's always a risk that they find out facts that are detrimental to the cause of medicinal cannabis. I'd never endorse deliberate ignorance in the name of liberty, so I'd have to endorse liberty itself with respect to cannabis on the grounds that people should be able to do whatever they want to their own bodies, even for pure recreation, without being put in a cage for it by the government.
My understanding of new libertarianism is that we want the government to put people in cages for all sorts of decisions they make with their own bodies, yes?
No. Now fuck off skum.
You're in one of your "Joe Biden did something good" moods.
More bullshit from scum masquerading as a point.
…so I’d have to endorse liberty itself with respect to
cannabismask and vaccine mandates on the grounds that people should be able to do whatever they want to their own bodies, ….When you say you oppose mask and vaccine mandates what you're saying is you favor mandates that force people to go to work in deadly conditions.
Everything's a trade-off, you just aren't thinking about liberty very hard because you let business elites and culty wackadoos do your thinking for you.
To be fair, some of them might die, with Covid, after getting shivved on a subway car or by eating some leftover office Halloween fentynal.
So your in favor of mandatory virtue signaling and medical experimentation?
Be careful what you wish for. If the FDA gets there hands on MJ it will be subject to the same prescription regime as every other drug they approve. Big pharma will get the big payoff. You can forget growing auto flowers in the sun room like my wife does legally.
You sound disaffected, delusional, and dispirited . . . like a right-wing misfit awaiting replacement.
By your betters.
Yes, “right wingers” grow lots of pot.
Idiot.
And considering his wife is growing pot I’d be surprised if he’s dispirited.
I can think of another political movement that always bragged about replacing people with their betters... Hmm.
In Wikard V Filbum lawyers who follow Biden's lawless stupidity SEE the endgame :the Supreme Court ruled that crops grown for personal use was under the regulatory powers of the Commerce Clause.
Based on the comments in the Washington Post, a lot of people seem to believe that this is legalization. As noted, growing or selling pot is still illegal, and State and local laws against pot have not changed.
And just in time for the midterms.
I can kind of understand people who were once pilots to wear aviators, but not this dude. Looks like a comic book character. President Skeletor, minus the muscles.
Oh, and hey retards! You know who you are! I'm comparing Biden to Skeletor without muscles! That means he's ancient and weak! With aviators!
Dimwitted asshats walking around with fedoras clamped between their gluteus maximus muses or something . You know who you are.
Sarc loves Biden sarc loves Biden say the resident feebs...
I'm afraid a gust of wind will carry him away. There go the launch codes. The storm will settle down soon.
Dude doesn't know where he is or who he's with. But he does love a good train!
Asshole.
Shotgun! Shotgun! Take a shotgun hit and legalize the weed! Dickhole.
This is why I don't vote.
OMG
Back to using drugs i see.
Someone please try to convince me sarc’s not broken.
He thinks this proves he says bad things about Biden. But he is overcompensating here. It does nothing to excuse his defense and deflection of the DNC the past 2 years.
He thinks other people are stupid because he is.
More liberal-libertarian progress, arranged over the objections of authoritarian, obsolete, worthless right-wing bigots.
Be glad we can at least mute them.
Carry on, left wing bigot.
"rescheduling plans won't make marijuana a legal medicine."
", it will not make cannabis legally available to patients unless and until the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approves specific products as safe and effective"
You know, like *medicine*.
The fuck we doing here Reason? This looks like getting marijuana off schedule 1 - that's a good thing.
Christ, everything Biden fucks up and these people dismiss it as 'well, at least he's not Trump's while here's a genuine win and you're bitching because it's not enough?
FDA shot down Obama's run at delisting in 2015. DEA opened comment period on delisting, and was shot down. BY law,, DEA must take science advise from FDA and HHS.
If necessary Biden can swap agency heads until he gets what he wants.
Fiona needs to know that invaders caught by Border Patrol or ICE are deported with extreme prejudice if they are convicted of any sticks and seeds possession or use law in any county or state. All such convictions, no matter how harmless the plant leaves, entail presumption of moral turpitude, hence deportation. Liberals and libertarians need to explain to foreigners that harmless leaves--non-habit-forming--are used as pretext for deportation at every opportunity, and some libertarian candidates seek repeal.
Just in time for libertarians to adopt, as their primary policy concern, a deep abiding desire to use the US federal government to punish abortion seekers and trans people for their free personal bodily decisions. I can't wait for a more fully articulated New Drug War, since we're suddenly so interested in what other people do with their own bodies.
Of course libertarianism will end up putting every single American in a cage before it endorses raising Charles Koch's tax bill by one cent. And that's a fact you won't even deny.
Ahh. The mendacity if the idiot left. Proclaim 12 year old getting tits and dicks cut off is a personal choice and they have the agency for those lifelong decisions. Next up Tony defends the personal choice of young boys to give him blow jobs.
I don't know if it's good for them or not, I just know that I'd rather they and their doctors make those decisions and not you and the US federal government.
It's not a principle if all you do is find exceptions to it because some shrieking harpy on FOX News is scaremongering you about something.
You see a lot of Fox News cites here? No? So you just keep making up bullshit lies. But nobody buys it. You’re a pathetic troll.
When you people say you don't watch FOX News, all that means is you hit the hard stuff. It's not actually a point in your favor.
Which is not a defense of you making up bullshit lies to try to make a point.
I don't know if I've ever met a trans woman who had bottom surgery. This is because a) In real life, I rarely talk to anyone about their genitals, and b) all the ones on the internet still have their dicks, or else what's the point?
Weird comment after calling out others for being obsessed with people’s genitals.
I don’t care if you chop off your own dick. In fact, I totally think you should.
And deprive the world of a thing of magnificence? I should get it armed guards, if anything.
Is there anyone here who doesn't define libertarianism as an all-consuming obsession with other people's genitals?
WHOOPS
Hunter Biden could be charged with tax crimes https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-63166809
AND (what you don't see): He would easily make marijuana a capital crime if it bought votes. You are destroying yourself by acting like he is your savior.
So I guess anytime that anything good happens we should be like "well, but what if the opposite happened?"
What a dumb fucking argument.
A win for liberty. Somehow didn't come from that "freedom loving" party though huh...
Requesting a bureaucratic review of existing Federal regulation is not remotely a win for liberty. It’s an express admission that they will be maintaining Federal control.
As the Executive Biden could have ordered MJ's removal from the Schedules. He didn't.
That you think permission is liberty is the source of your categorical error.
Edit: Well, that and the often displayed fact that you are an idiot. Along with being an all too obvious sockpuppet.
Wow, he managed to act sanctimonious while releasing zero prisoners. What a guy.
So a big virtue signal that does little to nothing to fix the problem, makes sense. Trump's First Step Act did more for non-violent drug offenders than this will do. This issue is ripe to be co-opted by Republicans. Unfortunately, most Republicans will probably continue to avoid this issue. Because the Left polarized the issue of criminal justice reform making it toxic for a lot of non-leftists, and establishment Republicans are still very beholden to Drug Warriors
Biden could easily remove the question on form 4473 that prevents marijuana users from buying guns, which violates their Civil Rights.
Gee, I wonder why he doesn't.
"won't make marijuana a legal medicine."
Libertarians for government controlled healthcare.
Oh fuck off Sullum you poorly closeted statist.
The best possible outcome with MJ is for the Feds to not be involved in any way shape or form.
This is a vote-buying move on Biden's part. He knows he's in the gutter and will do anything to gin up votes!
This is PURE BS. Those in a PRISON (vs jail) for Marijuana are notably there fore HUGE Quantities or a a plea bargain down from WORSE convictions.
Biden can NOT change the law by anything he does. It is up to Congress to decriminalize and up to FDA or whoever to remove POT from scheduled drugs.
Frankly, this is about attempting to gain VOTES at a midterm wherein the Dems have screwed themselves by fomenting partisan prosecutions and actions by government agents in damn near every agency. No one believes that we need 80,000 new IRS agents and no one believes that those agents need tens of millions dollars worth of small arms, automatic arms and ammunition.
Time to make sure that Dems lose their control over the PEOPLE altogether. They have PROVEN they are not for the people in any way.