Coloradans Might Fix Their Arcane Booze Rules
On the ballot in November, Coloradans can choose to have more alcohol in grocery stores and available for delivery.

Colorado is known for many things: Beautiful mountain vistas, epic skiing, and, in recent years, a fairly freewheeling attitude toward weed. According to industry observers, the state consistently ranks as one of the top five cannabis-friendly states. But in stark contrast to this open attitude toward cannabis, Colorado is mired in the dark ages when it comes to booze. This November, Colorado voters will have the opportunity to change that through three pending ballot petitions.
Any Coloradan who steps foot inside a grocery store notices a peculiar reality: A humble bottle of wine is nowhere to be found. That's not an accident, since grocery and convenience stores in the state are legally prohibited from selling wine.
Compounding this archaic rule is another outdated one that forbids most on-demand delivery services from dropping off alcohol at consumers' homes. This means that parents who buy their household's weekly groceries via a third-party on-demand delivery app—a common practice post-COVID—cannot add a six-pack of craft beer alongside their eggs and granola.
These restrictions are outliers in modern America, as 40 states currently allow wine to be sold in grocery stores and the 36 allow third-party delivery companies to deliver beer and wine. These states are as politically diverse as deep-blue California and deep-red Alabama.
Curiously, Colorado already allows grocery and convenience stores to deliver alcohol so long as they use on-staff employees to do so. However, given the way the modern system of grocery and beverage delivery works, many grocery stores partner with third-party delivery companies to oversee the delivery component of their businesses.
Requiring a grocery store to provide on-site store clerks as well as an entire fleet of delivery drivers often makes it financially and logistically impractical for stores to offer delivery. Even if a store could make these numbers work, Colorado stores must meet an additional requirement that at least 50 percent of each store's alcohol sales are from in-person customers rather than from delivery—which arbitrarily hampers more delivery-centric grocery models.
Simply put, Colorado's alcohol laws are needlessly restrictive and stunt the ability of ordinary citizens to purchase alcohol in ways that most other Americans take for granted. But reform may finally be on the horizon as Coloradans will have three alcohol-related ballot propositions to consider in the November elections.
If approved, Proposition 125 would allow wine in grocery stores, while Proposition 126 would allow the use of third-party delivery services for alcohol and make permanent the state's popular pandemic-era extension of to-go cocktails from restaurants. A third ballot initiative, Proposition 124, would uncap the number of liquor licenses a single entity can own. Currently, a single owner can only operate three stores inside the entire state, another arbitrary restriction.
Taken together, these propositions offer Colorado the opportunity to catch up to the majority of America when it comes to alcohol sales. It would also be more on par with how Colorado treats cannabis—after all, third-party delivery of cannabis is allowed in the state.
Polling has consistently shown that an overwhelming majority of Americans are in favor of these reforms: Recent surveys in various states have found that over 70 percent of respondents support both wine in grocery stores and to-go/delivery alcohol.
Alcohol is one of the most unifying issues in today's polarized political landscape. But despite this broad consensus, there still exists a small but vocal minority standing in the way. Incumbent liquor stores in Colorado oppose all three ballot propositions because they want to lock out competition from upstart competitors and new business models.
These stores argue that passing such propositions will allow larger grocery store chains to enter the alcohol marketplace at the expense of local mom-and-pop stores. But Colorado finally allowed grocery stores to sell full-strength beer in 2016, and while some liquor stores claimed they saw beer sales decrease, there is no evidence of any net loss in independent stores in the state as a result. Likewise, other states that allow wine to be sold in grocery stores and permit third-party delivery—again, a vast majority—have not reported significant numbers of independent store closures.
It seems that these incumbent stores merely want to ensure that alcohol delivery remains sidelined, wine stays out of grocery stores, and their businesses maintain a near-monopoly status quo on alcohol. Unfortunately, this determined protectionism prevents Coloradans from enjoying the basic conveniences and freedoms that consumers in most other states enjoy.
For a state known for its cannabis tolerance, it seems far past time for Colorado to liberate alcohol sales.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Which industry group funds this right-wing mouthpiece?
"Left-leaning foundations such as the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, the Energy Foundation, and the Foundation to Promote Open Society provided 26 percent of R Street’s total contribution and grants revenue between 2012 and 2017 and 71 percent of the organization’s total foundation support during that period. . . .
"Two of the longest-serving members of the R Street board of directors are the president of the left-of-center Taxpayers for Common Sense and a former official who worked for the Clinton White House and for Clinton Administration HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo."
https://www.influencewatch.org/non-profit/r-street-institute/
"...since grocery and convenience stores in the state are legally prohibited from selling wine..." FALSE... MANY (smaller) grocery stores don't sell wine but after legislation passed a few years ago, they can pay to get a full liquor license if they please... My local King Soopers has 7 or 8 full size aisles of Wine and Liquor... Check your info and post accurate articles please.
Not picking Left or RIGHT sides of the fence here, but the CO booze laws for grocery stores currently make it EASY and CHEAP to sell Beer, but MORE EXPENSIVE for them to sell liquor and wine... There's a world of difference between that and "...ARE LEGALLY PROHIBITED FROM SELLING WINE..."
I'd think reason.com would do a better job presenting the facts. For what it's worth I fully support the propositions on this years ballot in november, but it's Shtty to read an article written by someone who clearly doesn't live in CO stating NO GROCERY STORES CAN SELL WINE when i literally was... in the grocery store today buying wine...
Facts are for nerds. Reason writers are trying to make libertarianism cool.
OOPs, looks like i've been living in a relatively small box, but just to clarify- COLROADO GROCERY CHAINS ARE CURRENTLY ALLOWED TO HAVE UP TO 5 STORES PER GROCERY CHAIN selling wine and liquor...
Again, world of differnece between that and "...NOT LEGALLY ALLOWED TO..."
Correct. Not totally prohibited from in all cases. Still very limited.
I'm glad I can buy booze in Sundays now. Wasn't always able to in Colorado.
That and being able to buy actual beer at grocery/convenience stores instead of the 3.2% nonsense.
Arizona sells liquor and beer at gas stations. Still have a few drive through liquor stores also.
But in stark contrast to this open attitude toward cannabis, Colorado is mired in the dark ages when it comes to booze. This November, Colorado voters will have the opportunity to change that through three pending ballot petitions.
These ballot petitions are bullshit and I will oppose them. Yes the current CO rules are designed to favor smaller sellers rather than larger sellers. It was an oddity that came about after Prohibition when CO decided they wanted to open up alcohol again but without the appeal of gangsters and mafia taking over everything. That is NOT the Dark Ages.
The result is that CO has a ton of small distilleries, breweries, wineries. Both by numbers where CO is in the top 5 or 10 in each category in all states - and in market share where CO is in the top 2 or 3 in all states. There are four small breweries and eight small distilleries within a couple miles of me (all still in urban setting). All which have sit down - but who also can sell through a dozen (maybe) retail outlets.
Small sellers offer shelf space to local producers and small producers provide those small sellers with a unique niche. Chains and online offer none of that. Even their 'craft' aisle requires seriously non-craft mass scale.
The alcohol retail laws are not even remotely 'needlessly restrictive'. The largest single liquor store in the world - by far - is DaveCo. As big as most WalMarts. Most probably many of the top 10 single outlets in the world are in CO. There are tons of one location liquor stores owned locally. Each of which has a quite different inventory - and if you as a customer want them to sell a craft liquor you've run across, they will stock it if they can. Alcohol prices are generally quite low for the usual piss-water mass-produced options available everywhere else as well.
What will kill all of this are these ballot initiatives. All of which are mostly intended to reward scale. The ballot initiatives are funded by mass retailers from out-of-state. The PR in this article is clearly out-of-state horseshit. No surprise R Street has offices in DC, CA, TX, GA, and OH. Oh yeah - they understand small states.
Will the ballot initiatives pass? Unfortunately probably so. There are a ton of CA, TX, NY, IL and other big state escapees here now in CO. They don't know shit. They don't understand what makes CO the place they chose to move to. And they are completely driven by the mass-scale persuasion/manipulation techniques that they learned how to swallow in the big states where they used to live. So they are quickly turning CO into the toilet they left.
Oh - and this isn't protectionism either. CO retailers are also the best outlets for craft producers in other states as well. They won't require massive orders unlike the chain groceries, gas stations, liquor stores, or online outlets - or DaveCo for that matter - that dominate the liquor market in other states. Which leaves demand as a real management decision for craft producers. Maybe they don't want to be huge. Maybe they don't want to be bought out by Big Food or Big Liquor with 'crafted one barrel at a time - owned by Big Bud' stamped on their label as marketing mouthwash. In at least a couple out-of-state cases I know of, it is CO retailers that provide 'just enough' off-site demand so they can survive and concentrate on niche offerings and local sit-down.
so you know better than anyone how it should work, so we will use laws to do what the Top Man thinks is best. Got it.
I know what corruption caused by money from outside the state looks like - and that's what this is. Millions pour into Colorado's booze battle
'Wine in Grocery Stores' and 'Coloradans for Liquor Fairness' - supporting these propositions and who also paid to get the signatures to get the propositions on the ballot - have raised $8.5 million in the last month.
Instacart - $2.8 million
Amazon (Whole Foods) - $1.3 million
Target - $1.1 million
Albertsons/Safeway - $1.1 million
Kroger (King Soopers) - $1 million
Total Wine and Spirits - $400,000
On the other side - the groups against the propositions have raised a total of $200,000.
But hey of course you think the Top Men are the latter. Fucking tool you are.
You honestly think allowing the grocery store to sell wine is going to put the Colorado craft alcohol industry out of business?
Maybe you started drinking a bit early today.
Yes. There is a reason that 10% of all craft alcohol producers in the US are in CO with only 2% of the population. And it ain't because CO is restrictive and in the Dark Ages. It is because even at the nano start-up stage - before even a sit-down brew pub is viable - a producer can find retail outlets that will provide some nano-scale shelf space.
The entire point of these propositions is for the big chains to acquire market share themselves. Not by expanding the market for alcohol but by killing those small outlets off - or forcing them to merge/consolidate which has the same effect (killing off nano-scale shelf space).
I don't really expect the 'libertarians' in these comments to ever understand this. Too many big-state assholes.
“grocery and convenience stores in the state are legally prohibited from selling wine”
NYS is the same; no wine or liquor in grocery stores/no beer or mixers in liquor stores and liquor stores can not be owned by a chain. The state's stated policy is that there will be no competition between the two and liquor stores will be a small, locally owned business.
Well guess what. Starting next week, the Great American Beer Festival will be held - as it always has been - here in Colorado. Obviously this is highly restrictive Colorado - so gotta buy a ticket. So it ain't Oktoberfest - but it IS the biggest ticketed (meaning highly restricted and possibly even puritanical) beer festival in the world. With thousands of different brews that will never be available at your chain grocers - but are available at the festival and at tons of small liquor stores here in CO afterward.