A New Study Finds No Correlation Between Opioid Prescriptions and Drug-Related Deaths
The CDC, which issued disastrous pain treatment advice in 2016, is still pushing a narrative contradicted by recent data.

Six years ago, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) issued guidelines that discouraged doctors from prescribing opioids for pain and encouraged legislators to restrict the medical use of such drugs. Those guidelines, which had a disastrous impact on pain patients, were based on the assumption that overprescribing was responsible for rising drug-related deaths. But according to a new Frontiers in Pain Research study, that assumption is no longer true, if it ever was.
To support its theory that opioid prescriptions were driving drug-related deaths, independent researcher Larry Aubry and statistician B. Thomas Carr note, the CDC cited numbers that were already out of date. More recent data do not support the premise underlying the agency's pernicious advice. The CDC nevertheless included the same outdated analysis in the revised pain treatment guidelines that it published last February, which aim to ameliorate the damage done by the original version.
"It is critical that public health policy and individual patient care not be based on out-of-date or misleading information," Aubry and Carr write. They note that "the direct correlations used to justify the CDC guideline and guideline update," which "existed from 1999 to 2010," are "no longer present." The implication, they say, is that policies aimed at reducing opioid prescriptions are "unfounded and ineffective."
Explaining "the importance of prescribing guidelines" in 2015, the Department of Health and Human Services cited "a clear correlation between opioid prescribing rates and overdose death rates in the United States." From 1999 to 2010, it noted, "opioid prescribing quadrupled in parallel to increasing opioid overdose death rates."
When the CDC issued its guidelines the following year, the agency's director, Tom Frieden, said "overprescribing opioids—largely for chronic pain—is a key driver of America's drug-overdose epidemic." In congressional testimony two years later, Andrew Kolodny, director of Physicians for Responsible Opioid Prescribing, likewise claimed "the CDC has shown that a sharp increase in prescriptions for opioids resulted in a corresponding rise in addiction and overdose deaths."
Using data for 2010 through 2019, Aubry and Carr looked at the relationship between prescription opioid sales, measured by morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per capita, and four outcomes: total drug-related deaths, total opioid-related deaths, deaths tied specifically to prescription opioids, and "opioid use disorder" treatment admissions. "The analyses revealed that the direct correlations (i.e., significant, positive slopes) reported by the CDC based on data from 1999 to 2010 no longer exist," they write. "The relationships between [the outcome variables] and Annual Prescription Opioid Sales (i.e., MME per Capita) are either non-existent or significantly negative/inverse."
Those findings held true in "a strong majority of states," Aubry and Carr report. From 2010 through 2019, "there was a statistically significant negative correlation (95% confidence level) between [opioid deaths] and Annual Prescription Opioid Sales in 38 states, with significant positive correlations occurring in only 2 states. Ten states did not exhibit significant (95% confidence level) relationships between overdose deaths and prescription opioid sales during the 2010–2019 time period."
During that period, MME per capita dropped precipitously, falling by nearly 50 percent between 2009 and 2019. By 2021, prescription opioid sales had fallen to the lowest level in two decades.
Policies and practices inspired by the CDC's 2016 guidelines contributed to that downward trend. Aubry and Carr note that "forty-seven states and the District of Columbia" now "have laws that set time or dosage limits for controlled substances." In a 2019 survey by the American Board of Pain Medicine, the American Medical Association reports, "72 percent of pain medicine specialists" said they had been "been required to reduce the quantity or dose of medication" they prescribed as a result of the CDC guidelines.
The consequences for patients have not been pretty. They include undertreatment, reckless "tapering" of pain medication, and outright denial of care. In 2019, the Food and Drug Administration said it had "received reports of serious harm in patients who are physically dependent on opioid pain medicines suddenly having these medicines discontinued or the dose rapidly decreased." It said the consequences "include serious withdrawal symptoms, uncontrolled pain, psychological distress, and suicide." The extent of such problems was reflected in an admonition that the CDC included in its revised guidelines: "Clinicians should not abandon patients."
The authors of the original guidelines say their advice was misinterpreted and "misimplemented," but that was a danger they should have anticipated. The revised version no longer implies that opioid doses exceeding 90 MME a day are ipso facto medically inappropriate. But it urges caution about raising doses for patients with "subacute or chronic pain" above 50 MME per day, even while emphasizing that does not mean patients who already exceed that level must be forced to get by with less.
"The recommendations related to opioid dosages are not intended to be used as an inflexible, rigid standard of care," the CDC says. "Rather, they are intended to be guideposts to help inform clinician-patient decision making. Further, these recommendations apply specifically to starting opioids or to increasing opioid dosages, and a different set of benefits and risks applies to reducing opioid dosages."
Despite the sharp decline in medical use of opioids, the upward trend in opioid-related deaths, primarily involving illicit fentanyl, has not only continued but accelerated. Last year that number reached the highest level ever recorded. Like the "misinterpretation" of the CDC's advice, that outcome was entirely predictable, since the crackdown on pain pills drove nonmedical users (and some patients) toward black-market products that are much more dangerous because their composition and potency are uncertain and highly variable.
Yet the CDC is still pushing the narrative that more opioid prescribing means more opioid-related deaths. "In addition to the potential risks for patients prescribed opioids, these medications carry risks due to their potential for diversion and nonmedical use among individuals to whom they were not prescribed," it says in the 2022 guidelines. "In the United States, opioid prescribing increased four-fold between 1999 and 2010, and this increase was paralleled by a nearly four-fold increase in overdose deaths involving prescription opioids during the same time period…as well as increases in prescription opioid use disorder."
In light of what has happened since 2010, Aubry and Carr say, relying on those outdated numbers is highly misleading. They say the CDC's advice "should be corrected/updated to state no direct correlation has existed" between prescription opioid sales and drug-related deaths or treatment admissions since 2010, and "individualized patient care and public health policy should be amended accordingly."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
The CDC has no idea what it is doing?
I am shocked. Shocked.
#defundCDC
Also, there is apparently gambling going on in this establishment.
The CDC knows exactly what it's doing. It's a political body, and it's not a group of doctors treating patients. Many of the bureaucrats, are invested in Big Pharma in a conflict of interest. Further, their boss (currently Biden) has a financial interest in controlling people, and what health care and medications they are allowed to use.
Look at Fauci. He funded the creation of Covid, and also tortured Beagles via death by flea bites while being restrained. He even said the risk of a pandemic was worth what we'd learn by doing gain of function research to "get ahead" of viruses that jump from animals to humans. The MSM should keep repeating those facts, because our government, along with China's government, killed millions from their sin of pride and their narcissism.
But big pharma, small pharma, all have an interest in selling drugs!
I am a student and I do work part time on this website to meet my needs. One who is jobless or want to earn more money for himself, (res-01) should must try this because this is really very easy and less time consuming and also advantageous without investing any amount.
.
SEE MORE:>>>>
I am a student and I do work part time on this website to meet my needs. One who is jobless or want to earn more money for himself, (res-16) should must try this because this is really very easy and less time consuming and also advantageous without investing any amount.
.
SEE MORE:>>>> https://googlejobs0945.netlify.app/
All these Republican-controlled state legislatures don't have to pay attention to the CDC when they're writing new laws restricting drugs.
I'm almost as suspicious of finding no correlation. You can always find correlation. That's the basis of our entire broken social science system.
If you read the detail, they actually found a negative correlation in 38 states. In other words, as legal opioid sales went down, opioid deaths went up. In only two states did the data match the CDC's hypothesis (and at the national level, the correlation is statistically indistinguishable from zero).
Not to disagree with your broader statement that there's a LOT of really bad statistics out there but that doesn't seem to have happened in this case.
I'm actually more open to believe that one. Though that's because it goes my way.
Puritans would rather people die in agonizing pain than risk them enjoying the effects of the pain medication.
Nothing like ignoring the facts since the lawyers can get rich suing the makers!
They’ve made it so difficult and expensive to prescribe both opioids and benzodiazepines (Valium , etc.) that as a sole practitioner DDS I no longer prescribe them. It’s infuriating. Luckily the few times I need to prescribe them, their family doctor will usually do it if I call and explain. The CDC is fully politicized, therefore useless in my opinion.
Coming home with a couple weeks' worth of fun drugs was the implicit consolation prize for all the expense and annoyance of going to the doctor. Now it's ibuprofin for leg amputations, and I might just not go next time I probably should.
And say I wanted some drugs without going to the doctor. Since nobody has prescription fun pills to share, I'd have to go risk death from something I find on the street. Didn't think of that, did you? The thing that happens every time you ban anything?
But trends are cycles, and I'm looking forward to the backlash when the done thing in medicine is to put us in a stupor for a blood pressure check and a happy ending while they're at it.
Your use of “fun drugs” explains a lot.
The CDC has done nothing but harm patients who rely on these opiates for chronic pain relief. I’ve recently had a 10 level spinal fusion and because of these draconian guidelines and oversight, I’m forced to rely on these drugs for relief but not without constant phone calls and emails to doctors, pharmacists for limited numbers of meds every 12 days. I constantly have to be made to feel like an addict because of the levels of pain and the “rules” that are in place when it comes to refills. Prior to the CDC guidelines I had what I needed without the constant governmental pain that they always cause whenever they are involved in anything in our lives.
While the CDC does have stricter opioid guidelines, the bodies actually doing the policies are state legislatures.
Out of curiosity, I wonder how the authors factored in the dramatic increase in narcan availability in their model?
“In the United States, opioid prescribing increased four-fold between 1999 and 2010, and this increase was paralleled by a nearly four-fold increase in overdose deaths involving prescription opioids during the same time period.”
Note the weasel words, “… overdose deaths involving prescription opioids…” Overdose deaths involving prescription opioids could mean, but does not necessarily mean, that opioids were “overprescribed.” It could also mean that prescription opioids were increasingly being stolen or diverted for uses not prescribed. Yet another example of how “post hoc ergo propter hoc” reasoning is flawed.
I think you’re on to something. Anybody who thinks that narcotic excess use (and associated over-prescribing) is not a problem, is very naive and has never worked in a busy ED. Regardless of the the source over-prescribing and the bogus association of “pain scoring” as a “5th” vital sign, has directly contributed to the opioid death epidemic. Explain the US’s 8% of world’s population needs for ~ 80% of the world’s prescribed opiates. And on a common sense note, is a patient with know history of alcoholism, nicotine dependence and/or prior long term opiate use problems or diversion going to do well with another opiate prescription (without close monitoring)? I think not.
Getting government out between patients and their physicians is a different issue.
I'm skeptical the earlier data is no longer valid and can be tossed out on the basis of just one paper.
Opioids are a money maker. They are addictive. Considering the practices of companies like Purdue Pharma, I'm especially cautious about "research" pertaining to their drugs.
The cdc is the enemy of the people. If I could put a bullet in the cdc brain I would.
I am absolutely thrilled the Federal Government got involved. The know better how to run our individual lives than we individual people do. I can’t understand doctors disagreeing with Opioid Crisis laws - after all, Doctors don’t make laws, so Doctors should be ignored- only Congress knows how to make great laws. After all, Congress passed a law that causes all sorts of restrictions on cold medicine to stop the Meth crisis - and that worked so well that Meth no longer exists!!!
(Yes, I AM BEING SARCASTIC!!!)
Doctors served as useful idiots for transforming the Harrison Tax Act into a federal prohibition law. This was done by testimony in support of indictments against other doctors of less-than-fanatical missionary zeal. Senator Mann, who sponsored the "Get Jack Johnson" Mann Act, pressed for coercive prohibition to shore up the 1912 Hague Convention that by August of 1914 started World War 1. Note: Anarchist youths shot bigwigs practically every week in Europe, but laws cutting into Big Pharma were another thing entirely.
So where is the study showing no correlation between the banning of harmless Woodstock drugs and these sudden increases in deaths from glue, gasoline and solvent sniffing, guzzling ethanol, overdosing on downers and narcotics and driving into abutments?
The Nazi-Regime-Agency(?CDC?), which issued disastrous pain treatment propaganda(?advice?) in 2016, is still pushing (?propaganda?) a narrative contradicted by recent data(?reality?).
Yeah; What's new? The Nazi(National Socialist)-Regime has been pumping loads of propaganda on the people for years to conquer the USA and build their Nazi-Empire.