Concerned About Abortion Surveillance and Law Enforcement? Time To Treat Encryption Seriously
A mother-daughter arrest in Nebraska was fueled in part by unencrypted Facebook messages police accessed through a warrant.

If you're concerned about police and prosecutors in your state tracking abortions in a post-Dobbs world, developments in a case getting national attention should encourage you to learn whether end-to-end encryption is available in the communication tools you use.
A Nebraska mom, Jessica Burgess, and her then-teenage daughter, Celeste Burgess, have been charged with several crimes for coordinating and executing a plan in April to purchase medication to induce an abortion at home and illegally dispose of the stillborn fetus.
Media coverage suggested that this case is an example of how abortion law enforcement might look after the Supreme Court struck down Roe v. Wade in the June Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health decision. But to be very clear here, this abortion both preceded the decision and also took place when the daughter was 28 weeks pregnant, running counter to Nebraska's existing abortion laws, which bans them after 22 weeks unless medically necessary to protect the mother's life. The Dobbs decision had no bearing on what happened here.
What's also getting attention, though, is that the evidence Norfolk, Nebraska, police used to bring the charges against the mom and daughter includes private Facebook messages they sent to each other. The police filed a search warrant with Meta, the company that owns Facebook, to provide the contents of these messages and ordered the company to not disclose the existence of these search warrants to others, including the suspects.
Facebook cooperated, which has prompted a handful of people to encourage everybody to delete Facebook or shut down their accounts or otherwise punish the company. It's not as though Facebook could have just declined to cooperate with a search warrant. They could have fought it, but it's not clear, given the circumstances of the case, that they would have won. A spokesperson for Meta told Vice's Motherboard that the warrants they received did not mention abortion and instead appeared to be an investigation of a stillborn baby that was illegally buried and then burned.
It just so happens that it's possible to privately communicate with Facebook's tools in such a way that could prevent the company from sharing those messages with the police. Facebook has implemented end-to-end encryption with some of its private messaging tools. Through end-to-end encryption, only the reader and the recipient can read the contents of messages. Facebook cannot access them or read them and cannot provide them to law enforcement, even if they have a warrant.
Facebook even has helpful instructions on how to set up end-to-end encryption. For starters, you need to use the separate Facebook Messenger app on your smartphone. If you're an old fuddy-duddy like myself who still uses the direct message tool at Facebook.com to send messages to your friends, encryption is not offered on the desktop website itself.
If you are using the phone app for Message, however, you can have what Facebook refers to as "secret conversations" in which users can send messages, images, videos, and voice recordings through this encryption system.
We know that government and law enforcement hate end-to-end encryption and are trying to keep citizens from being able to keep private conversations, well, private. The Department of Justice has been trying to keep Facebook from spreading this encryption to all its platforms. As J.D. Tuccille noted this morning, the U.K. is pushing hard to try to force social media companies to compromise encryption so that they can use it for law enforcement purposes.
But encryption backdoors can be used for so many intrusive surveillance mechanisms and to enforce oppressive laws that can control what we do with our own bodies. People who are concerned about access to abortion in the long-term, particularly in states implementing harsh bans, should be taking a closer look at the communication tools they're using to see what sort of encryption is available.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
We should be careful though. Good fences make good neighbors, and I do a bunch of paranoid encryption stuff myself. The left-libertarian urge to just ignore laws they disagree with seems to have had a strong tendency to lead to bigger boots crushing more faces though.
I am a student and I do work part time on this website to meet my needs. One who is jobless or want to earn more money for himself, (res-15) should must try this because this is really very easy and less time consuming and also advantageous without investing any amount.
.
SEE MORE:>>>> https://googlejobs0945.netlify.app/
have been charged with several crimes for coordinating and executing a plan in April to purchase medication to induce an abortion at home and illegally dispose of the stillborn fetus.
What the fuck. I just read the details. That's 2 full months before Dobbs? So this was illegal under the previous Roe jurisprudence even? What the fuck did they do?
Okay, I actually read the article. That's a near third-trimester abortion. They could have just driven to Colorado if they wanted it. What the fuck?
Reason, you have to pick your arguments better, holy fuck.
These people obtained an abortion pill (all legal, then and now), but then used it to induce an abortion for a fetus aged 28 weeks, which was and still is illegal in their state (I assume it's legal if the fetus is 22 weeks old or younger). Further, they illegally buried the fetus and burned it (there are crimes against doing things with dead bodies for good reasons).
And you're right. They all could have avoided breaking the law by doing this in a nearby state that allows it. While I don't advise people break laws regarding things that shouldn't be illegal (e.g. victimless crimes) the authors remarks about encryption and avoiding government snoops are good advice. It also helps protect you from the risks explained in the book "Three Felonies A Day", which explains how the Feds target the innocent.
They all could have avoided breaking the law by doing this in a nearby state that allows it.
No, they couldn't have. They could've gotten an abortion via another method, but the use of medical abortion after 10 weeks isn't approved by the FDA. I don't advise people break the laws regarding things that shouldn't be illegal either, I do advise people against doing things that are generally stupid, dangerous, immoral, or all 3.
Not just that. Three of the four abortion doctors in CO or NM who openly provide third trimester abortions do not just do abortion on demand then. Afaik, the only abortion doctor who does (or did - he's 81 now) do abortion on demand used to practice in Nebraska (when he initiated the SC cases about D&X a surgical means of abortion) but he moved to New Jersey.
There is definitely something missing in this story. Namely:
Why the mother/grandmother chose to abort at that stage because the limited number of abortion doctors who do that also therefore interview and accept patients beforehand.
IF they did talk to one of those doctors and were rejected for a surgical abortion, then what made them think a medical abortion was even remotely an option at that stage. Or is there a missing (and illegal in most states pre-Dobbs) surgical abortion in this case
IF they didn't talk to one of those doctors, then were they merely consulting Drs Google and Facebook via the sort of information/communication medical channels that were part of most states pre-Dobbs 'medical knowledge network re late-term abortion' because those were illegal in Nebraska then and are more so now.
That last is kind of part of the story here but will only come out at trial. But whatever is part of any trial will devolve into the partisan agitprop warfare about abortion that ensures nothing will really come out at trial because no one is listening re abortion anymore.
Also, as I've pointed out the ENB and Scott before, medical abortions, much like chemotherapy, effectively poison the "growth" without being poisonous enough to kill the host. But the window for this effect is narrow as once the growth gets too large and/or too invasive, you either need to administer too much poison for the host or poisoning the growth and the resulting tissue death (along with the poison) would overburden and collapse the host's vital systems. Acting like women should be free to perform chemical abortions at 28 weeks is akin to suggesting they should be free to perform their own at-home coat hanger abortions too. Even if you think they have an unfettered right to abort, that position is terribly misogynistic.
Even if you think they have an unfettered right to abort, that position is terribly misogynistic.
I mean, FFS, even PP, who wants to sell the baby for parts says, "Eh, 11 weeks is kinda risky, you should probably consider one of the other abortion options."
And they BURNED the baby.
Burned it.
Yeah, let's mourn their problems.
The mother and grandmother also burned the body, possibly alive.
"But to be very clear here, this abortion both preceded the decision and also took place when the daughter was 28 weeks pregnant"
Hopefully these fine women will suffer no legal consequences for disposing of a clump of cells. But if they do, Reason.com should hire them after they're released. Their enthusiasm for late-term abortion evidently rivals even ENB's. 🙂
#AbortionAboveAll
That "clump of cells", at 28 weeks, is 12 weeks away from being born. It dreams and opens it's eyes. If it is born prematurely at 28 weeks it has a high probability of surviving and thriving. Hardly a "clump of cells".
I love when people take OBL seriously. It's one of the few good things left at Reason.
Well… you know what they say in the Mises/GOP libertarian alliance (of which this Black and gay is a GOP Proud member like Milo and Caitlin)? The law is the law.
That’s what libertarians like me can appreciate about libertarianism. It’s inherent flexibility. You just a.) take the issues you find morally distasteful and then b.) get the police to enforce those laws regulating such behavior. I mean, who can’t get behind (pardon the expression) that?
The difference between you and obl is that while obl reflects opinions that are ubiquitous to the left, you represent a tiny fraction of people, and narratives that aren't reflected in the mainstream. It's painful to read your "parody".
I think the time for encryption was during COVID surveillance, but that's just me.
Yeah. Funny how figuring out which bar to meet someone at or whether Church is open on Sunday shouldn't even need to be protected by encryption, but a plot between a mother and a grandmother to poison the mother in order to kill the unborn grandchild might need to be done without the evil prying eyes of the law.
I'm just glad that the solution Mr. Shackford has is to be subversive, which can only lead to violent revolt, rather than to point out how peacefully voting libertarian would solve these conflicts of right by ushering in an era of evictionism. Which is the libertarian solution in my opinion anywho. Just like it's wrong to kill your rentor for not paying rent, it's wrong to kill your fetus for taking your property.
What self-respecting, property-loving libertarian doesn't support the unilateral, extrajudicial execution of trespassers? Commonlaw easements are for commies.
But to be very clear here, this abortion both preceded the decision and also took place when the daughter was 28 weeks pregnant, running counter to Nebraska's existing abortion laws, which bans them after 22 weeks unless medically necessary to protect the mother's life. The Dobbs decision had no bearing on what happened here.
...And the time machine opened and out stepped a pregnant ten year old girl...
I don't get the point of this comment, I apologize because usually yours are good, can you explain further?
A spokesperson for Meta told Vice's Motherboard that the warrants they received did not mention abortion and instead appeared to be an investigation of a stillborn baby that was illegally buried and then burned.
Serious question for the medical ethicists... at what point is an abortion a "stillborn baby"? 33 weeks? 117 weeks? 937 weeks?
The mother and daughter's cover story was that the baby was stillborn. Nobody is actually referring to the dead baby as a stillborn child.
That didn't answer my question.
Do you want a pithy answer or a real answer?
Both would be useful
I think the pithy answer is "It's stillborn after you set it on fire."
Such activity should be punished by drawing and quartering. You know… the more this Black man thinks about ISIS and the Taliban the more I think they actually might be epististemologically libertarian.
In the US (pre-Dobbs),
a miscarriage occurs at/before 20 weeks
an early stillbirth occurs from about 20 weeks to 27 weeks
a late stillbirth occurs from about 27 weeks to 36 weeks. IOW after generic preemie viability
a term stillbirth occurs about/after 36 weeks.
These different definitions are a big reason why infant mortality rates differ in rich countries and why the US is high. These will also now be legislated definitions in different states post-Dobbs.
Many an excised tumor qualifies as "human remains" but not as "a person." Creepy disposal laws are tools to facilitate forensic investigation of actual murders of real constitutional persons--and incidentally to be of value in disease control. But glossolalian Bauble-babbling mysticism will evidently not rest until empowered to kidnap babies into a brainwashed Jugend of ready-made Jihad-fodder to stand at Malthusian Armageddon.
These different definitions are a big reason why infant mortality rates differ in rich countries and why the US is high. These will also now be legislated definitions in different states post-Dobbs.
It will be funny when the Dobbs decision does more to "fix" infant mortality than the ACA ever did.
I say "fix" as neither floating the definition nor increasing access to care fundamentally improves the care itself.
The states where abortion was already heavily restricted pre-Dobbs have had higher infant and maternity mortality for a long time. Mainly because they tend not to provide pre-natal care to poor mothers either when that care can't result in a patient decision. It will probably get worse when providers can no longer provide medical info now without legal repercussions.
But yeah it will be an opportunity to jerk stats and definitions around for political purposes
Through end-to-end encryption, only the reader and the recipient can read the contents of messages. Facebook cannot access them or read them and cannot provide them to law enforcement, even if they have a warrant.
So facebook says. I remember some time back when I used to use WhatsApp, somehow the topic of Devil's Tower came up in one of our conversations within the app (e-2-e encrypted). Shortly after that, Devil's Tower started showing up in other feeds unrelated to Facebook. That was pretty bracing.
So the only question left to me was "how"? It's possible that at the time I was still using Google's keyboard on my phone and so google was aware of what I had typed. So even though the app itself is "secure", the medium you use to type in your conversations may not be. To this day I have no idea if that was just a huge coincidence, or I typed something in somewhere else and forgot, but just assume everything you say and type into your phone is being captured somewhere by someone.
Once I was at a softball tournament and my phone was left at home. Afterwords, some of the guys were talking about going to a specific strip club in Portland. When I got home, Facebook was showing me advertisements for that specific club. (It hadn't happened before nor happened since)
My phone wasn't even there, yet somehow Facebook knew I was at the tournament AND that my friends were going.
My phone wasn't even there, yet somehow Facebook knew I was at the tournament AND that my friends were going.
This may be the effect of networks of networks. Your friends did not have their phone at home, may have posted on Facebook that they were at the tourney (with you) and facebook, doing what it does: making connections between other associates and friends was able to connect that to you.
The disturbing part is that it's impossible to tell if it's helpful or nefarious. Mastodon and open source all the way!
Me and friend was having dinner and I was talking about how good a specific concert was. His phone beep and Siri sent him a live video of that band from youtube.
The mic on my Iphone is so hot that I can tap lightly on something and the phone pics it up. Perfect for eavesdropping on conversations in another room.
But to be very clear here, this abortion both preceded the decision and also took place when the daughter was 28 weeks pregnant, running counter to Nebraska's existing abortion laws, which bans them after 22 weeks unless medically necessary to protect the mother's life. The Dobbs decision had no bearing on what happened here.
Good try Scott but being even more clear; 28 weeks is also unconscionable for a/the mother to do to the daughter. After about 12-15 weeks medical abortions fail ~5% of the time and hospitalization rates for the mother begin to climb upwards of 40%. Were a doctor to do this, it would've been unequivocal malpractice. For someone without a medical license to suggest/encourage this is something between criminal negligence and assault.
The surveillance issue is disturbing, but that mother was medically ignorant. A medication abortion attempt at 28 weeks is dangerous for her daughter, not to mention illegal in most states because viability is generally considered 24 weeks. Abortions post-24 weeks are difficult to get in the bluest of states. Third trimester abortions in all states are basically illegal without strong reasons documented (endangering health of mother, or a fetus with conditions incompatible with life outside the womb).
I see Scott is becoming a journalist.
He got to the third paragraph before giving the con away.
Just for the record, stop using (anti)social media all together.
The Libertarian touting of encryption as somehow protecting our inalienable rights to privacy is one of those things that illustrates the lameness of much of modern dorm room Libertarianism.
Yes, encryption might theoretically protect a person exercising important personal rights, just as a fully armed modern military division might protect (for a while) a colony of freedom-loving citizens from the forces of a Hollywood-style evil empire. Or an insistence on an absolute right of privacy on one's personal property could protect any number of utterly sociopathic enterprises.
You see, boys, the way it has always worked is that things like fourth amendment protections can always be overridden by the due process of judicial authorities. Without such a failsafe, real freedom grinds to a screeching halt of unworkability.
Unbreakable encryption that can effectively counter any social control while still using the full resources of society is just one of those things, like considering nuclear weapons to be protected by the second amendment is just one of those things that are deal-breakers of a free society. Sorry.
Tribal philatelist here has just offered examples of assertions masquerading as argument, the thing described at length by Robert Anton Wilson. Observe that the no-math conclusion is future-tense prophesy--a dead giveaway.
This is exactly the birth control 1873 Comstock laws punished with 10 years on a chain gang and a fine exceeding a quarter of a million dollars--provided the mother's advice to daughter went through the Postal Monopoly. By focussing on the revenge clauses in the new 14th Amendment, mystics ignored "All persons born..." which acknowledged that there is a time border beyond which the Constitution cannot extend coercive force to within a woman. The 1972 Libertarian platform put this in writing and La Suprema recognized it... before being absorbed anew by Comstockism.
I'm more interested in those 87,000 new IRS employees who are going to be hounding anyone in the US who makes $400,000 per year or more, or those who have more than $600 in their bank accounts.
Does Reason have anything much to say about those new officials? Have I missed something?
You didn't ask the [WE] Power-Mad Gov-Gun loving ?public? MOBSTERS if you could remove that from yourself!!! /s
Shouldn't be long before it takes a Gov-God blessing to take a crap.
Steganography both embeds a private message in an innocent-looking sound or image file AND hides the fact that anything is embedded. The only way to stop steg use would be to block all sharing of photos, videos, etc., which even the most thuggish governments would be loathe to try.