Read the Real Romeo and Juliet, Not the Kid-Friendly Version
Though book banners may try to convince otherwise, students don't need protection from the passion portrayed in Shakespeare's classic.

In ninth grade, like high school freshmen all over America, I was assigned Romeo and Juliet to read for my English class. As a longtime literature geek even at the age of 14, I was thrilled to be entering the big leagues. We'd read some Charles Dickens and a little John Steinbeck. But this? This was William Shakespeare. This was serious, complicated stuff.
You'll have to imagine my excitement as I took the book home to show it to my father, a professor of American literature. The look of irritation on his face as I passed him the book is something I'll never forget.
We had been given a textbook version of Romeo and Juliet—an expurgated, shortened, made-appropriate-for-schoolchildren version. Some pettifoggers had decided that the play's boisterous sexuality, raunchy puns, and panting young lovers needed to be toned down for the students who would be reading it.
As my father pointed out, cutting all that material renders the play exceptionally dull and, in some places, barely comprehensible. Mercutio, for example, could barely appear at all in such a version. That turns his death into a minor side plot rather than a tragedy that spurs much of the play's violence.
Romeo and Juliet is a story driven by passion, in all its sexual, physical, and "embodied" aspects. It revels in jokes about blood and maidenhood, in puns about how soon Romeo will be "coming" to Juliet, and in a balcony scene that scales the height of love poetry but is unafraid to have Romeo plaintively ask Juliet (in tones familiar to many high school students), "O, wilt thou leave me so unsatisfied?" The play takes us from the dream of love to its physical realities and then to its tragedies. That is its strength. That is why we still read it more than 400 years later. And that is not something from which students need protection.
I was lucky. My dad promptly handed me his Riverside edition of Shakespeare's plays, told me to read the "real thing," and said I should come see him if I had any questions about what I read. I learned to love Shakespeare for the beauty and the bawdiness of his work. I never found him dull or hard to understand, because my dad made sure I got the real thing. I can draw a direct line from that parenting choice to nearly every academic decision I have made since.
This article originally appeared in print under the headline "Romeo and Juliet."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ok, groomer.
"I have no idea whether Skwire is transgender or gay, but quit slandering LGBTQ people!" - Chemjeff
I made $30,030 in just 5 weeks working part-time right from my apartment. When I lost my last business I got tired right away and luckily I found this job online and with that I am able to start reaping lots right through my house. Anyone can achieve this top level career and make more money online by:-
.
Reading this article:>>>> https://oldprofits.blogspot.com/
WHAT ABOUT SNOW WHITE
"Would you BAN James Joyce's Ulysses!!?"
Yes, for being incomprehensible.
I made $30,508 in only five weeks operating part-time proper from my apartment. When I misplaced my final commercial enterprise I were given worn-out proper away and fortunately I observed this task on line and with that I am capable of begin reaping masses proper thru my house. Anyone can obtain this pinnacle degree profession and make extra cash on line by:-
.
See Here:>>>> https://dollarscash12.blogspot.com/
Hey I know! Let's construct a curriculum that doesn't offend any conservatives at all.
Stories can have the rugged white male American as the good guy and some evil brown-skinned foreigner as the bad guy. Don't you dare suggest that the American isn't the hero in the story. That just demonstrates that you hate America and are a traitor. And no I'm not racist for depicting the brown guy as the villain. But don't you dare write a story where the Muslim is the hero, like that "Ms. Marvel" nonsense. I'm not taking my kids to watch that woke garbage.
Stories can depict straight heterosexual men falling in love with straight heterosexual women, the way God intended it to be. Don't you dare depict any other type of romantic love in any other context. That just demonstrates that you're a groomer pedophile teaching disgusting filth to young kids.
Stories can depict the farmers and the plumbers as the Real Murican backbone of America, and everyone else living in those decadent cities as just being a bunch of arrogant elitist snobs who don't give enough deference to the wise and studied opinion of your average factory worker who slept through highschool. Those people just hate the icky deplorables.
It is very important that the school curriculum properly educate the youth of America about the real history of this country, like the Founding Fathers were all devout Christians who wrote the Constitution because of their piety and faith, that the Constitution states that America is a Christian nation, that the Civil War wasn't really about slavery but about 'states rights', that the Progressive Era was about wacko socialist Democrats imposing communism on this country, that evil Democrats are responsible for everything bad in this country and it's only those sober Republicans that have to clean up their messes time and time again, and that the greatest presidents of all time are Trump, Reagan, Trump, Nixon, Trump, and Washington. Because we wouldn't want the school system to be indoctrinating kids or anything. Oh no no. That's what Democrats do. That isn't what hard working Real Murican Patriots do.
Hey, I know, let's stop telling parents what to teach their kids. If they want to teach their kids one thing or the other, let them do it. And since the left has pushed us all into government schooling, the place to do that is at the local and state level.
Problem solved.
Libertarians should care about the education consumptive choices of parents about as much as we care about the restaurant consumptive choices of parents.
I've been on these here boards long enough where I was arguing with liberal commenter Joe about the retconning of photographs containing a children's author with a cigarette in his hands.
"Good for the children" I was told.
I without a doubt have made $18k inside a calendar month thru operating clean jobs from a laptop. As I had misplaced my ultimate business, I changed into so disenchanted and thank God I searched this easy task (neh-63) accomplishing this I'm equipped to reap thousand of bucks simply from my home. All of you could really be part of this pleasant task and will gather extra cash on-line
travelling this site.
>>>>>>>>>> http://netcash94.tk
The elitist bile here is positively delectable.
Wait wait wait. I was told that the "groomer" slur really just refers to teachers keeping secrets from parents about the curriculum or their discussions with students. Where are the secrets here? What are teachers concealing from parents in this case?
Go be disingenuous at Salon with the rest of the your purvy pals, Jeffy.
=======>
Oh look, Gray Box ML is raging impotently at me again. Let's see, did he call me a Nazi? A pedophile? A fifty-center? Someone pushing ActBlue talking points? Hey why not all of the above! Maybe I'm a Nazi pedophile fifty-center! Maybe George Soros hired me personally and specifically BECAUSE I'm a Nazi pedophile. Huh? Did you consider that, ML?
Show us your banned list!
How petty and repugnant of you to lord over someone that you have silenced, like a Jacobin mocking a critic he just sentenced to the guillotine.
However, it is appreciated when you slip and let your authoritarian colors shine through so gloriously. It makes discrediting the rest of your regurgitated lefty musings that much easier.
Pretty fucking hilarious how he's imitating Laursen's passive-aggressive "oh look I blocked you but I'm still going to act like a sped whenever you respond to my dumb comment" act.
Birds of a feather, and all.
students don't need protection from the passion portrayed in Shakespeare's classic
What about the white supremacy and colonization?
Romeo was part eggplant.
Walken and Hopper should have been in several more movies together.
^^^ What he said.
I taught high school English literature for a semester on an emergency contract in 1999. We read Othello, and the teacher version of the textbook said some students might not be able to handle a passage about wine being the great equivocator (it makes a man “stand to” and “not stand to”). The homework assignment I gave my students was to add the passage in ink to their textbooks.
Sadly, two decades later and Shakespeare is being canceled in college courses due to anti-Western wokeness.
Yes, the local woke school board is always prattling on about gun violence, triggering language, the need for counseling for depression and such. But then they sanction a school play about gang violence and murder, underage sex, suicide, and a cleric aiding and abetting teenage fornication. The latter is obviously "Shakespeare and good for the students" while the former is "opposition to extreme right wing white supremacist wrong-think." I wonder if any of Shakespeare's plays dealt with hypocrisy?
That was Macbeth, not Othello:
PORTER Faith, sir, we were carousing till the second
cock, and drink, sir, is a great provoker of three
things.
MACDUFF What three things does drink especially
provoke?
PORTER Marry, sir, nose-painting, sleep, and urine.
Lechery, sir, it provokes and unprovokes. It provokes
the desire, but it takes away the performance.
Therefore much drink may be said to be an
equivocator with lechery. It makes him, and it
mars him; it sets him on, and it takes him off; it
persuades him and disheartens him; makes him
stand to and not stand to; in conclusion, equivocates
him in a sleep and, giving him the lie, leaves
him.
https://shakespeare.folger.edu/shakespeares-works/macbeth/act-2-scene-3/
I totally agree that kids in highschool ought to read full Shakespeare. Other parents disagree. So fucking what?
Is western civilization going to end because parents in Kentucky are prudes? Why the fuck are we so obsessed with telling people to consume content WE think they should consume.
Whether you like it or not, some parents are going to raise their kids different than you. And that's ok. The libertarian answer is to push these decisions as locally as possible.
OMG! I hope they don't read the unexpurgated Bible! Especially Song of Solomon which can be quite racy when you understand what it's talking about.
p.s. I recall a preacher once explaining that it was a big metaphor about Jesus' love for the church. Uh no, not unless he meant that Jesus was participating in actual sexual foreplay.
Does such mockery score you points with lefty chicks? If not, who is for? It is certainly not for libertarians.
THANK YOU for proving my point, Brandy. There is nothing more rich than people sitting in their cloistered bomb shelters within dystopian, hellhole, california towns lecturing deplorables about how they interpret the bible.
The fact that you find some contradiction in the Old Testament to somehow worth mocking Christians shows that you don't understand much about the Christian Theology. For this to come from a Californian is extra special, given the contradictory, impactful, self destructive societal problems, laws and political games that you tolerate and even support every day in your state and cities.
But yes, those silly sky god worshipers- they really need a dose of reality.
I take it you haven't actually read the Bible you are thumping. I am not mocking it, just pointing out the bits about sex are not metaphors for the church.
Again you prove the point. My whole point was that certain snobbish people love nothing more than to tell others (on the other side of the country) how wrong their beliefs are because they think they thought up some gotcha. They think the logical trap or inherent contradiction they found is worth deriding those poor deplorables, as they continue to give a pass to the shitholes they live in all day.
What you are pointing out about the old testament doesn't matter if you are talking to a Christian.
First, he wasn't thumping any bible. In fact he was saying as libertarians we shouldn't care what PARENT'S are teaching their kids.
Second, you sure as fuck were trying to mock him and Christians in general.
I had to read R&J in Advanced English class, taught by the Jesuit who also taught Latin. (This was public school, btw). And during the class he managed to secure our auditorium/theatre for a showing of Zeffirelli's Romeo and Juliet. You know, the one with half a second of bare breasts in it from an under age Olivia Hussy. And the showing was open to other classes as well.
Well the people from the other classes all giggled at the tits. Of course they did. But not our class. Was it because we were more "mature"? Probably not. I think it was because we had actually read the play first.
Also, you might be gay.
What? Because I saw Olivia Hussy's tits? Really?
Romeo and Juliet is far too heteronormative for the modern classroom. Unless - was Juliet's original name Jerry? It's been so long since I've read any Shakespeare.
The last work I read by Shakespeare was Ugly Stik.
What does this have to do with censorship?
Maybe it's censorship under the prog definition of not including stuff in the public-school curriculum that progs approve of.
Otherwise, it's a curriculum decision which may be right or wrong, but it represents what the school chooses to teach.
The more control the parents have over their kids' education, the less this is even a problem.
Surely the author doesn't endorse the prog "solution" - shut up and let the govt schools teach kids what the govt wants?
bring on the Book of Enoch!
they gave us a Holmes novel in 8th grade where the first line or so of the book is "Sorry to have knocked you up" but that wasn't a thing yet to us 8th graders so we were confused why Mrs. Butler made such a big deal about it before we even started the book
As my father pointed out, cutting all that material renders the play exceptionally dull and, in some places, barely comprehensible.
Like a news story where someone insists on going by They/Them.
Reason has a really expansive definition of 'banned'.
So expansive that it loses all clarity and detail.
But a very, very, verrrrry narrow definition if 100% of social media companies collude to take something off their platforms, on the same day, at the same time after a phone call from Nancy Pelosi.
Which is more effective, banning a book or offering it censored but not warning that it has been changed to distort the content? The latter is much, much more effective. But even more effective is to change the meaning of words to their opposite or to re-define them into an oxymoron.
Is that clear and detailed enough for you Agammamon?
Meanwhile in the 1980s, we not only read the actual text, but got shown the movie showing a topless, underage Juliet
^This. The downside of attending the school I did, where most of the teachers were lazy, is that we barely skimmed the actual text and we got a terrible education. The upside is that we watched the movie instead, and I can still vividly recall Olivia Hussey's creamy bosoms. You'll never see a classroom full of 14-year-old boys paying better attention (or being more "at attention," if you will).
Now do Huckleberry Finn.
A biblethumper, but a very good friend just the same, phrased later Heinlein as "poorly disguised pornography".
But methinks it was simply wonderfully well-written and interesting pornography. People enjoy their bodies, and using them, both solo and with others in various numbers and combinations. To paraphrase Patrick Henry, "If this be pornography, then make the most of it!" And please, do write about it!