The Slaughter-Free Future of Cultured Meats
Real factories are beginning to replace factory farms.

GOOD Meat, the cultivated meat division of Eat Just Inc. just announced that it has contracted with bioreactor construction company ABEC to build a large-scale cultivated meat facility in the United States. When operational, gigantic vats at the factory will produce 30 million pounds of chicken and beef meats annually. The company nurtures real animal muscle and fat cells in a growth medium derived from plants and yeast. Their cultivated chicken is already being sold in Singapore.
Assuming that the company grows 15 million pounds of each meat, that would be enough chicken and beef to feed 150,000 and 250,000 Americans respectively. That much cultivated meat would also mean 6 million fewer chickens and 20,000 fewer cows would need to be slaughtered each year.
The environmental benefits of shifting from conventional to cultivated meats would be substantial according to a 2021 life cycle analysis by researchers at the Dutch consultancy CE Delft. Assuming renewable energy is used in both conventional and cultivated meat production, vat-grown meats reduce global warming impacts by 17 percent, 52 percent, and up to 92 percent compared to conventional chicken, pork, and beef production, respectively. And compared to conventional meats, the production of cultivated meats is projected to cut land use by 63 percent to 95 percent and water use by 51 percent to 78 percent.
GOOD Meat is far from alone in ramping up cultivated meat production. Competitors include UPSIDE Foods, Meatable, Wildtype Foods, and Aleph Farms.
In 2019, the U.S. consultancy AT Kearney estimated that 35 percent of all meat will be cultured and 25 percent will be plant-based replacements by 2040.
UPSIDE Foods' chief operating officer, Amy Chen, told The Guardian that before she agreed to join the company, she had to taste its meats. "I had that first bite and realized that it was simultaneously one of the most unremarkable things and one of the most remarkable things I've ever eaten. It's just meat," she said. I am looking forward to that same experience some time in the next couple of years.
For more background, see my 2020 article, "Is Farm-Free Food the Future?"
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Soylent Green; coming soon to your neighborhood grocer.
….the factory will produce 30 million pounds of artificial chicken and beef meats annually.
FTFY
And how much "green" energy will it take to produce to do that?
Green energy? Like from the Great Power Battery on Oa?
ROFL - good one!
That much cultivated meat would also mean 6 million fewer chickens and 20,000 fewer cows would need to be slaughtered each year.
Here let me fix this so even YOU might understand, Ron--
That much cultivated meat would also mean 6 million fewer chickens and 20,000 fewer cows would need to be
See?
It's always been amusing watching people act horrified at livestock slaughter, as if wild death is cleaner and neater and more humane.
You know, that reminds me; why is it that animal rights wackos only care about humans killing animals? It's only a violation of an animal's alleged rights if a human kills an animal? A lion kills and eats a gazelle and it's crickets for some reason. We aren't going to arrest the lion for violating the gazelle's rights? Animal rights are absolute bullshit...
I've posed that question and never gotten any kind of rational useful answer.
The only possible answer is that raising animals for food, or keeping them for pets, is slavery. But where do you stop? What about all the ants you step on in your backyard? What about all the bacteria you keep prisoner in your gut? Was getting rid of smallpox genocide?
And what about ants which keep bugs and milk them? What about wasps which lay parasitical eggs in critters as food for their eggs?
On top of all that, who appointed these vegans as guardians for the animals? What proof do they offer of knowing what their wards want, or what is good for them? Do they really want to have CPS breathing down their necks when their precious gazelle gets eaten by a lion?
Yeah, pretty much. I realized when you start pursuing the implications of the idea of animal "rights" it just falls apart so easily. The question necessarily suggested by rights so quickly become absurd. Do we arrest the lion? How? Do we put him in cuffs? Tranquilize him? Wouldn't tranquilizing him be violating his rights? So I guess we have to put him on trial; how do we assign him a lawyer? He has to have defense right? What if doesn't like his lawyer and wants another one? How the fuck can we even tell if he doesn't? Well of course the answer is that animals don't have rights and thus all questions like this, questions that would matter a great deal to those who actually have rights have no meaning when it comes to animals.
It is kind of telling though that they only seem to care about rights (or even mention them) when humans do things to animals.
The more radical ones don't even care if domestic animals are all killed. They don't think dometicated livestock or pets should even exist.
It's a bit like the weird woke anti-colonialist view of the non-western world. As long as they have their authentic, indigenous culture intact, they can oppress and violate each other all they want and it's all good.
The bacteria in my gut are very happy to be there, thank you. If expelled, they all would (do) die. I didn't ask them to live there, but if they didn't, I myself would die.
Complicated, isn't it?
Another minor twist is intra-species crime vs inter-species. They can't answer that either. If they say lions can kill gazelles because that is inter-species and natural, then so is humans killing cows and chickens. If humans killing humans is criminal because it is intra-species, then does that make it criminal for male lions to kill each other every mating season? What about males killing infants when they take over? I know this happens with lions and chimpanzees; is that illegal infanticide, just as with humans? Who's going to enforce this? How to you read them their Miranda rights, or get them to testify or put up a defense?
I'd be fine hanging Fauci rather than hunting down and killing whatever bat is responsible Wuflu.
Having rights comes with moral culpability for violating the rights of others. I don't think that works with non-human animals very well. Unless there are some we can learn to talk to.
I am not bothered by the slaughter, but some of the farming conditions are terrible. If we can product meat in a factory, it is better than meat from a factory farm. A cow, pig, sheep or chicken raised on pasture is best, but may not meet needs.
yet those same eedjits actively promote the widespread slaughter of millions of unborn children each year, by means that are SO BRUTAL and painful they'd be putting livestock producers in jail for cruelty to animals if even half a dozen head of livestock were to be slaughtered by similar methods.
Non sequitur, or what?
"In 2021, over 9.2 billion broiler chickens, weighing more than 59.5 billion pounds, liveweight, were produced. More than 41.9 billion pounds of chicken product were marketed, measured on a ready-to-cook basis."
Way to save the planet.
Well, they're ceasing to be either way...
Back to the question of whether existence is preferable to nonexistence. At least those chickens had a chance to be alive.
cluckito ergo sum.
I could care less where my meat comes from, as long as it tastes good for the price. If I can't tell real meat from fake, so what?
But the idea that fake meat is going to somehow save the planet is just so much green poppycock. My understanding is that a lot of livestock graze land which is unsuitable for crops, and way too dry to ever be forested. May as well put it to use. If the Greenies want to keep it boring pasture land, they can always buy it.
Not to mention, not grazing it isn't healthy for the land. It evolved to be grazed. When it's undergrazed, it's actually less healthy for a whole variety of reasons. The science is pretty damn solid on this.
It evolved to be grazed by the native wildlife. You welfare ranchers don’t raise bison.
The grass doesn’t know who is eating it.
No, but different species graze in different ways which affects the ecosystem differently.
The only constant you can count on is continuous change.
How does that refute my argument?
You didn't make an argument, sarcasmic. You never do. You made an idiotic, non-factual, self-defeating assertion and then insisted we all join you in pretending it was a point. It's no wonder you're so fucking enamored with trannies, they do the same thing.
Large bison herds aren’t natural either.
Explain why not? They’ve been here for thousands of years.
There was also a far longer stretch of time when they were not.
So? That doesn’t mean they weren’t here naturally before humans wiped most of them out.
sarcasmic is still frustrated that he is no longer free to gambol across field and plain.
what do you mean, "it evolved"? It was MADE that way in the beginning for good reason. Then MAN were created and put here to manage the whole process. Yes, we've often bungled it, but moving production of protein sources to indoor manufactories is not a suitable response.'
this afternoon I drove through about an hundred miles of coastal lands, not fit for crops but being used for the production of cattle for food. I drove through several thousand acres not suitable for crops, and several thousand more that were. A wise man, and a good steward, will use the different kinds of land available to him for different products, That is what "stewardship" is. Buying up large tracts of land and leaving them to go fallow is NOT good stewardship. Especially when it drives large scale industrial factory production of proteins for food.. Bad use of land.
On the other hand, if it can made practical and cost effective, it would be a step towards being able to establish permanent bases on the moon and/or mars.
But, but, does that mean no space cowboys?! I’m not ready for that.
Only as a post hoc fallacy. Whether you ship 5 lbs. of cultured beef to Mars, 5 lbs. of cow beef to Mars, 1 lb. of dehydrated cultured beef and 4 lbs. of water or 1 lb. of dehydrated cow beef and 4 lbs. of water, you're still shipping 5 lbs. of mostly water off to Mars. It's the same stupid argument as shipping human gestation pods to Mars rather than human women.
Living in close quarters with lots of other humans the colony develops a communicable disease. The lab creates a novel mRNA vaccine to combat it. Does your testing skip straight from cell culture testing to human testing or do you keep some livestock around to test it on first? Monkeys and apes, dogs, cats, tortoises, mice, rats, rabbits, fish, frogs, spiders, and insects have all been to space, many well before us.
Does your testing skip straight from cell culture testing to human testing or do you keep some livestock around to test it on first?
There no time for that sort of thing, you science denier.
No, but I DO keep some livestock around to EAT and also make use of wild animals as a protein source. Preactical, and cheap. Not to mention VERY tasty.
I mean... it did.
Kinda takes on a whole different meaning when 30% of the colonists refuse to get vaccinated or vaccinate their kids.
that thirty percent will survive unhurt, because their natural immunity will function as the Maker designed, and the injected thirty percent will lose about half their number within two years. Because the shot won't prevent their getting OR spreading it, whilst the natural immunity of the healthy ones will deal with the pathogen. Permanently.
Is this stuff ever going to be like actual meat? So far what I've seen is some kind of nasty looking goo. I want a nice, marbled steak. And while I don't want to cause gratuitous suffering in animals, I don't have any moral qualms about killing things to eat.
Nice well marbled steaks are for Party members only. To teach them humility by eating the hard, chewy meat of the reactionary times.
You will enjoy your processed 'beef'. As will your family. Besides, we've had your teeth removed along with those pesky testicles. Gum up, Comrade!
Mutton for the plebes. And Haggis!
Let them eat blood pudding!
Come now, Comrades! You know better than that. The plebes get only the best industrial pap, whilst we must suffer through eating the flesh of animals.
Only the best for our workers, eh?
Aye, made from the ooots the sheep wouldna eat!!
Maybe it would work for low-end stuff like chicken nuggets or those plastic tubes of ground beef?
Of course more alternative sources and lower prices for those would mean that your fancy steak just got even more expensive (and even more of a status symbol).
Which would only increase wastage from commercial slaughter. Currently we utilize 95-97% of the cow or chicken. What doesn't end up as prime cuts go into products like chicken nuggets and hamburger and sausage. If those are being supplied by vat grown meat, that just removes the marker for trim and low end meats. Hardly very environmentally friendly.
He's making some pretty false categorical economic assumptions. Primarily, that chicken nuggets and filet mignon are competing for the same resources in the same market. They aren't. You/we can produce twice as much chicken nuggets and twice as much filet mignon and drive the price of both down simultaneously. People don't generally say, "I need to balance my budget, so I'll eliminate my filet mignon spending and replace it with chicken nuggets." they say, "I'll cut down on the amount I spend eating out at a place that wouldn't be caught dead serving chicken nuggets, prepare my strip steaks at home, and feed the kids chicken nuggets."
The truly interesting phase is when they start departing from merely trying to reproduce traditional meats, and start inventing tastier or more healthful meats.
Yeah, can't wait. Worked really well when invented hydrogenated vegetable fat to replace lard and butter.
Yeah, now grocery stores are full of processed crap.
Uhhhh, didjya miss the memo about the lard being hudrogenated everywhere? It is, and I won't eat the commerical garbagel. Real pig fat slowly rendered is dear, and VERY tasty. The brick of Armour hydrogenated lard is NOT, and that is what is contributing to early death from cholesterol poisoning.
Everything I've read is that the mouth feel and texture is completely different and not very pleasant.
You will come to like the “mouth feel”. Open wide. — Klaus Schwab
For a steak, yes I want pasture feed cattle. But for a fast food hamburger or taco, I don't think it matters.
I don't want to cause gratuitous suffering in animals
A world devoid of gratuitous suffering is a world devoid of sports. I'd be more inclined to believe people (not you) about their proclivities towards gratuitous suffering if we didn't go through a mostly peaceful couple of years of lockdowns.
lockdowns and "peaceful" protests. Not to mention a few million brutal abortions each year. But we MUST all protest the humane and efficient slaughter of millions of head of cattle, pit, sheep, chicken, turkey, etc.
Get a life, greenies! Immagonna continue to eat my protein......
Real Frankenfood. Ummm.
"And compared to conventional meats, the production of cultivated meats is projected to cut land use by 63 percent to 95 percent and water use by 51 percent to 78 percent."
My bullshit meter is pegged. There is zero truth to this.
The idea that some BLM land is 'used up' because cows are grazing it as animals have done for millions of years is also stupid.
The freed up land will be covered with bioreactors using all the "saved" water.
Anything left over will be for windmills and solar farms.
There's probably some truth to it. Almost all meat is fed by means other than grazing, at least to some extent, and the animals convert that their feed into significantly less food. How much more efficient (and thus cheaper) an industrial process can be at making meat from grain is a question for the market to decide, if it's ever left up to the market.
the animals convert that their feed into significantly less food
This is incorrect.
the animals convert feed that we cannot eat into food
This is correct.
More correct:
The animal converts feed, much of which was grown on land that could have been used to grow crops for direct human consumption, into food with much fewer calories than what it consumed
I'm not an expert on this, but again, this can only be settled by comparing the free market price of real meat and artificial meat.
5 ounces of boneless, skinless chicken breast contains 276 calories. Commercial broiler chickens are fed primarily corn and soybeans. 5 ounces of corn contains 125 calories. 5 ounces of soybeans contains 147 calories. Corn and soybeans taste like shit and are not nutritionally complete. You can feel free to sublet my corn and soybean ration to chicken farming.
You know what *else* cultures bovine muscle and fat cells in a growth medium derived from plants and yeast?
A cow maybe?
Benito Mussolini?
Most of the feed given to finish livestock is stuff that was never meant for human consumption or waste from human food market, or waste from distilling and beer and wine brewing. Like in the PNW, they feed a lot of waste from the French fry industry and potato chip industry, stuff that isn't marketable for a variety of reasons but puts on pounds quickly. And it's not pound for pound you need to compare even then. Meat provides nutrients that plants don't provide efficiently or can't, such as protein, vitamin B complex, Vitamin A, Vitamin D, Vitamin K (basically your fat soluble vitamins) and minerals such as zing and iron.
"Most of the feed given to finish livestock is stuff that was never meant for human consumption..."
"Horse Corn", growing up in the mid-west, and the farmer was more than willing to give you an ear so you wouldn't sneak in and steal 10.
Yeah, I grew up with a corn field next door, and not sweet corn like the field on the other side of the river, this stuff was meant for dried corn for corn meal and the like.
I won't say it was great, but if you got it young and cooked it immediately it was as good as *bad* sweet corn.
The water claims are total bullshit. Most of the water usage figures used by the greens is actually rain water, almost all of that gets recycled.
"...My bullshit meter is pegged..."
There was a 'study' published by "23 and Me" a couple of weeks ago regarding the various effects of Covid on various populations, some of which 'effects' were 'made me depressed' or similar. Meter now wiggling quite a bit.
Toward the end: "Self-reported results". *BANG* against the peg.
It has been proven over and over that graizing cattle and sheep on such "useless' lands restores it to health by the presence of ll those critters turning the near barren and dead land into rich fertile farmland BECAUSE of the action of the protein production on the grazing lands and the soil restoration. from the elimination performed by the long term residents on the six farm production factories
I'd bet a lot of people who support this also want to ban golden rice.
...and golden showers.
Nah, those people think we can all live on locally grown organic lettuce or something.
fed to us through the iron bars of our cells out in the gulags.
AND we WILL like it........... (or be culled from the gene pool
"I'd bet a lot of people who support this also want to ban golden rice."
Went to a certain gym for a period of time, lots of 'personal trainers'. One was a 20-something male, who you could hear anywhere in the gym whining about KEMIKALZ!!!!!
He was covered with tats.
Here's the question: How much?
If all those externalities are so much better, you can make a product at a competitive price, right? If not, you're likely only to sell it to ideologues or people who don't actually want to eat meat in the first place.
Do we REALLY think 60% of "meat" will be fake meat or cultured meat in 15 years? Seriously, close to 2/3 by 2040 is a pretty bold estimate and assumes the sorts of things that only people surrounded by Vegans might assume.
Well that's where the law comes in. Given enough "Humane Treatment" laws and "precautionary culling" to stave off bird flu, the price of real meat will be so high that everyone transitions to it anyways.
And, just as in the middle ages, only the Elite will be able to eat real meat.
I was about to say, this is the totalitarians' wet dream. I guarantee the government will intervene to "encourage" the "correct" choice.
Fake meat will be the new electric car, consequences and reality be damned.
Baileys bs meter is seriously broken
I'm starting to think the real Bailey died and is now just a pen name for Bill Gates.
Why not, we were less than 10 years away from mass starvation in 1968 when Ehrlich published The Population Bomb. We were 10 years away from all sea life being destroyed in 1988 when Danson prognosticated. We were 10 years away from Manhattan being 8 feet under water in 2006 when Gore released An Inconvenient Truth. We're 2 years into Ocasio-Cortez's 12 year doomsday prediction from 2019. We've been perpetually 10-15 years away from either total annihilation or eating insects as our primary source of protein since the 1960s.
The future according to Ron,carbon free' energy, robot bodies, meat grown in vats. Sounds like Dune to me.
I thought opium was illegal but Ron must have a stash because this is surely a pipe dream.
OK, I'll take it if it comes with instantaneous interstellar travel.
TBF the Slig was not grown in vats. It was a cross between slugs and pigs, and many found it quite tasty. The Tleilax children, on the other hand, were grown in vats (axlotl tanks)...which were in fact the Tleilax women who had been genetically altered into living growth vats.
Sounds more like Thunderdome or Blade Runner.
Eat a dick, nitwit.
Yeah, that's nice. Other people can do whatever the hell they want; I will never eat this crap.
The soylent green comments really need to be addressed. We use human pieces for eyes, kidney's, hearts, blood transfusions, etc. Is it moral to also eat cultivated human meat? Or is this form of meat not really human since it is not viable and it's only just muscle grown in an Axlotl tank?
I don't think there is nothing immoral about eating cultivated human meat. In addition to the taboo of murder, the other reason humans have tended to dislike cannibalism is that any pathogen in human meat can easily jump to the human consuming it. This is less likely with other animals. If your pig or cow has a cold, that cold is unlikely to go to you. Indeed, the few pathogens that can infect humans (e coli, lysteria, salmonella, etc) are noteworthy specifically for that reason.
Any human meat will need extra care and handling to ensure that it doesn't become a vector for EVERY illness of every human that comes in contact with it on the way to the final consumer. This is one reason why cannibalistic cultures tend(ed) to cook their human meat well, well done.
* I don't think there is anything immoral...
If it is cheap and tastes OK, I'd imagine we will see it in Burgers first.
I am skeptical that they will produce some nice steaks or roasts, etc.
But my guess is that it is going to cost 5x as much and be equivalent to mediocre quality ground beef.
I would also like to see cultured broths.
Just domt fill up on the bugs your Marxist masters will tell you to eat.
Spoiler: It is NOT going to be cheap. Maybe cells in a vat have a higher feed conversion ratio, and less waste. Maybe.
They're not self-reproducing and capable of feeding themselves while exposed to a non-sterile environment.
Keeping cell cultures alive and productive is tough, where "tough"="expensive".
Best to only eat things God created, as is intended.
Don't think god created the chicken.
Israeli companies are producing some innovated food tech, including cultured meat.
Is it kosher? Is this how they get to kosherize bacon? I can understand the impetus.
Cultured meat can be kosher if it's inspected and they don't add anything unkosher. This is a boon to the European Jewish communities in countries that banned kosher slaughtering.
If god didn’t want us to eat meat he wouldn’t have invented steak sauce.
Eat shit and die, asshole.
While it simultaneously reduces household waste disposal and the need for cemeteries.
The company nurtures real animal muscle and fat cells in a growth medium derived from plants and yeast.
As opposed to entire fields of mobile vats that culture animal muscle and fat cells in a growth medium derived from plants and yeast? Oh, you'll have to pump water to the 'slaughter-free' vats rather than letting the vats roam and hydrate themselves? How efficient!
And we expect that people who won’t eat GMO crops will eat vat grown meat?
Sit down, shut up, and give your every last meal to The Science!
They will. Bear in mind the same people who spent half a century bitching and moaning about Big Pharma profiteering by poisoning us and insisting that weed cures cancer are the same people who turned into BELEEB TEH SCIENCE! Pfizer apologists fighting each other to be first in line to get their third and fourth COVID boosters.
Just say NO to GMO chicken!????
I think when the technology advances to produce synthetic meat cheaply enough for fast food company, will see a tipping point. Synthetics will take over with farm raised animal meats being a specialty for grilling and upscale cooking.
"GOOD Meat,.."
False advertising, based on experience to date.