Study: Jersey Girls' Refusal To Pump Gas Is Costing Everyone a Lot of Money
Research on the effects of Oregon's loosening of its self-service gas ban finds that allowing adults to pump their own gas increases supply and lowers prices.

Bills that would have ended the last state-level bans on adults pumping their own gas in Oregon and New Jersey both flamed out this year. A new study purports to show how much the failure of reform is costing drivers.
In March, the Oregon Legislature adjourned without passing a bill allowing gas stations all over the Beaver State to make some of their pumps self-service. Self-service pumps are currently only allowed in smaller rural counties.
Over in New Jersey, another bill similarly allowing gas stations to have some self-service pumps stalled after legislative leaders came out against it in March, reports NJ.com.
On the local level, voters in Arlington, Massachusetts, rejected a proposal to end the community's self-service ban at the annual town meeting earlier this month.
An estimate from Oregon's fire marshal that it would cost an improbable $550,000 to implement the self-service gas reform doomed that state's bill. Meanwhile, Politico's reporting on the Garden State's perennial effort to reform self-service finds that the politics of reform is always an uphill battle. Historically, any leader that tries to put the power to pump in the hands of drivers is soon inundated with angry calls letting them know that "Jersey girls don't pump gas."
By not wanting to take on the political and regulatory costs of reform, politicians from both states are forcing the costs of higher gas prices onto motorists. That's according to a new study from Clemson University's Vitor Melo which finds that bans on self-service gas stations reduce supply and drive up prices.
In 2018, Oregon implemented a slight reform of its full-service mandate by allowing gas stations in counties of 40,000 or fewer people to have self-service pumps. Melo's study used daily gas prices for all gas stations in the state reported to the website Gas Buddy between 2016 and 2019 to tease out what impact the repeal of self-service had on gas prices.
After controlling for counties' levels of unemployment, poverty, and median income, Melo finds that allowing self-service saw gas prices drop in the affected counties by 4.4 cents per gallon. The price decline nets out to $90 a year for a household with three drivers.
"A self-service ban in the retail gasoline market leads to an increase in marginal costs of all gas stations and consequently a reduction in supply," reads the study. "This reduced supply leads to higher prices and lower quantity."
Melo suggests that repealing self-service mandates in urban Oregon and New Jersey would likely put more downward pressure on prices, given that wages are higher in both those areas than in rural Oregon.
Any reduction in the price of gas would obviously be welcomed by motorists suffering from today's record-high gas prices. Station owners would also benefit from having to hire fewer people or being able to redirect existing staff to higher-value tasks.
Once again, that win-win proposition was thwarted by the perilous politics of reform.
Rent Free is a weekly newsletter from Christian Britschgi on urbanism and the fight for less regulation, more housing, more property rights, and more freedom in America's cities.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Forget prices. How about giving consumers choice?
Only government knows what’s best.
Thus, they can choose for us. Win-win!
I actually have received $30,700 in no extra than 30 days via running part-time via a laptop. Just once I had misplaced my final job, I changed into so perturbed however happily I received this easy on-line provide now doing this I am equipped to get thousand of greenbacks from the consolation of my home. (res32) All of you may actually do that profession and advantage extra cash on-line traveling following site.
.
>>>>>>>>>> https://brilliantfuture01.blogspot.com/
It's amazing how many utilitarian arguments for the consequences of freedom are the natural outcome of freedom. It's almost as if principles are .... uhmmm, useful in their own right.
Liberty Works, and Liberty is Right.
Despots and statists would like a word with you.
Here's two words for the despots and statists: Fuck Off.
They got a choice in the rest of the country and we, according to New Jersey, picked the wrong option. So they're not taking any chances.
self-serve in Texas & my s.o. doesn't fill her car either. jersey guys doing it wrong.
I wonder what your s.o. does when you are out of town.
She has the pool boy gas’s up the car, duh.
I don't keep her on a leash or anything.
Hey, don't kink-shame
sorry. *nttawwt
Product Description:
NEW JERSEY IS ONE OF ONLY 2 STATES IN THE COUNTRY WITH A NO SELF SERVICE LAW. THAT'S RIGHT, OUR GOVERNMENT DOES NOT TRUST US TO PUMP OUR OWN GAS! SHOW YOUR STATE PRIDE (AND IGNORANCE) WITH THIS ATTRACTIVE OVAL AUTO MAGNET THEY ARE QUALITY PIECES, USA MADE AND WILL LAST FOR YEARS WITHOUT FADING.
As I say, New Jersey is what the rest of the country would be like had we lost the American Revolution, or the Cold War.
South Jersey should have gone through with the secession in the late 70s it was a beautiful place to be a teenager in the 80s.
^THIS^.
We just couldn't get away from those damn northerners.
You mean Easterners. North, central and south Jersey don't actually exist.
On the other side of the fence, IL has a law that requires you to be present at the pump while filling your car and recently considered a bill banning self-service. Since COVID, I've noticed more and more IL drivers walking away from the pump putting us all at risk of living through a real life Michael Bay movie scene.
Is that considered a risk? I've always done that. I start filling up, go inside, get a cup of coffee and an apple fritter because the gas station apple fritter is my favorite type for some reason. No apples in it, that might be it. Just sugared lumps.
Probably less risky than eating gas station pastry.
Gas station sushi; now, that's just taking on a dare, like Russian roulette with one empty chamber!
Excellent digression, my compliments to you sir!
There is some risk of static discharge igniting gas fumes. But I think sitting in your car while the pump runs is the bigger risk for that. There have been a bunch of fires caused that way. I'm sure you can find video. If you touch your car somewhere away from the filler you should be good.
Tasing suspects at gas stations does seem to pose risk as well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DQprJ84M2qY
I do advise against wrestling someone in/around a pool of gas and then discharging 20-150K volts into anyone on the ground. If your car or phone or whatever is generating more than the ~5,000 volts you get at your average door handle, don't roll in a puddle of gasoline before operating it. Considering the general design specs of around 0-24V, probably not a good idea to operate it without rolling in gasoline either. Don't power up any Tesla coils you may or may not be transporting when fueling up your car either.
Is that considered a risk?
That's a loaded question; considered by whom? Traditionally (20-30 yrs. ago), it was good practice because not every pump had overfill shutoffs, not every shutoff was infallible, and spilled fuel was, varyingly, $5/gal. (OK, dammit, 50 yrs. ago).
However, with regard to the law, there were a number of car fires at pumps in the run up to passing the law. Ironically, for the majority if not all of them, the motorist was standing there when the car caught fire and the cause was spuriously blamed on static electricity (even cell phones). Of course, just like firearms, if you know a thing or two about the combustion of gasoline, you know you can douse a lit match or cigarette in gasoline and, without the exact right combination of air, fuel, and pressure, worrying about static discharge leading to combustion is a farce on par with worrying about the pump being struck by lightning.
Does leaving the engine running while refueling present any added risk of static spark?
Any? Yes. Considerable? No. Remember, there are three sides to the fire triangle and static discharge isn't the only factor.
If your car is generating open electrical discharge in the process of, uh, 'normal' running, it's utterly fucked up and you have plenty of signs that *should* tell you "dumping gasoline onto this is a bad idea". Of course, the internet is full of things like people pumping gasoline into plastic grocery bags but, generally as pragmatic libertarians, we try to avoid the "We should ban gasoline powered cars [or stuff in general] because stupid people exist." More likely is that you fuel mix/timing is off and your exhaust is fucked (or will be) and you're generating open flame, also known as backfiring.
Much of that was before the vapor retrieval systems, when you had the vapors venting through the fill tube. Mythbusters did a show that showed how hard it was to get gasoline vapors to ignite. It was one of the few shows where they actually got it right.
IL? I assume looking for potential tax and fine revenue.
All the Illini across the river are in Iowa buying gas.
Massachusetts solves that "problem" by removing the ratchet from self-serve pumps. It's a paternalistic PITA "solution", and for anyone with hand strength issues should be considered discrimination.
In the days before the ratchet you just put the gas cap in the handle...easy fix.
Damned gas caps are all on a short tether now. At least on the cars I've had recently.
Or of dying in a freak gasoline-fight accident.
I don't know if it's law, but most Wisconsin gas stations have signs posted saying you should stay with your car when pumping gas.
It's a safety issue, because the auto shutoff could fail.
In Illinois (Chicagoland) you have a good chance of getting carjacked at the pump.
Yes with NJ, I cannot fault them for not trusting them to do much of anything.
"After controlling for counties' levels of unemployment, poverty, and median income, Melo finds that allowing self-service saw gas prices drop in the affected counties by 4.4 cents per gallon. The price decline nets out to $90 a year for a household with three drivers.
While I certainly do support gasoline vendors' right to choose whether or not to allow customers to pump their own gas, I think that $90 dollars a year for a household with three drivers, or, in my case, $60 a year, probably costs a lot less to middle-income households than having every gas-jockey in the State unemployed and even more reliant on tax-supported programs, such as food-stamps, welfare, etc.
Just my two cents.
NOTE:
"The average Gas Station Attendant salary in Oregon is $23,301 as of April 26, 2022, but the range typically falls between $19,001 and $29,001."
https://www.salary.com/research/salary/alternate/gas-station-attendant-salary/or
Can you say Broken Window Fallacy?
My immediate take as well; there are a lot of other jobs attendants could be filling that are more of a benefit for the money.
So, no more DIY window fixing (or any other repairs)?
Do you have a union card? No? They fixing your own window is what we call scab labor. Hope you don't mind a big inflatable rat in front of your house.
Just about every retail establishment within 500 yards of a Jersey gas station has "Help Wanted" signs up. Restaurants, car washes, auto supply stores, grocery stores. Laying off gas pumpers will result in about zero net job losses; may even pick up jobs in other sectors as families spend their gasoline savings on other goods.
But some of those "gas pumpers" might actually have to work for a living.
I have to wonder if an organization isn't behind the "Jersey girls" bit? We just started being able to buy beer in convenience stores. There was a place where two competing chains had stores across the road from each other. One of the stores was about 1,000 ft. from a school. A "concerned parents" group popped up that was against the store near the school. There was all kinds of stories in the local media. It turned out that the "group" was a few employees of the across the street chain, being paid by the chain. I wonder if there isn't something similar here?
I think that $90 dollars a year for a household with three drivers, or, in my case, $60 a year, probably costs a lot less to middle-income households than having every gas-jockey in the State unemployed and even more reliant on tax-supported programs, such as food-stamps, welfare, etc.
Just give everyone everything for free and reduce incomes to $0. Freedom achieved!
Then you fail at basic economics.
I guess I wasn't clear: I am arguing for choice, and from what I have seen in CA, where there was exactly one full-service island in the entire county I lived in (I am now in rural Oregon).
My average "fill-up" (at 5 cents a gallon in extra costs), comes to about 35 cents for not having to get out of my car. To me, that is well worth it.
Rural Oregon counties, such as the one I live in, have the choice.
And I haven't seen a help-wanted sign at a gas station. At Taco Bells and the like, yes. but not at a gas station.
edit: Oregon vendors SHOULD have a choice.
Fumes over fajitas, si?
In my younger years, I worked both. The banter amongst the gas-jockeys was a lot more interesting than the complaints from customers and employees at Dairy Queen, and the pay sucked at both, so, yeah 🙂
"I guess I wasn't clear: I am arguing for choice, and from what I have seen in CA, where there was exactly one full-service island in the entire county I lived in (I am now in rural Oregon)."
Support for laws regarding who is allowed to pump gas =/= "choice" to anyone who cares to think about it.
Fail.
Jeff: You may prefer to pay more to stay in your car, but most people don't, and a full-service station cannot survive on a handful of customers. OTOH, my father preferred to get out of the car and pump his own gas even before self service stations existed. He managed a gas station in the 1950's, he knew the sort of irresponsible teenagers and career losers that applied for jobs as pump jockeys, and he didn't want them touching his car!
In New Jersey and urban/suburban Oregon, the legislature took away the choice when self service began to be popular in the 1960's. In the other 48 states, I remember many gas stations in the late 1960's and 1970's with both full service and lower-priced self service pumps; as drivers got used to self-service, they stopped using the full service and eventually most stations switched everything to self service - by their customers' choice.
One aspect of free markets is that the majority and sizable minorities get what they want, but tiny minorities are often ignored - but anything decreed by law is worse for minority choices. Generally the political process gives the majority what it wants, ignoring all others. Worse, personalities in the legislature and executive sometimes means that a minority choice that happens to include a few key politicians gets enshrined in law, with even the majority not being allowed their first choice. In Oregon and New Jersey, it looks like a temporary majority was made permanent by the legislature...
Surprising absolutely no one.
Now this is how you do perfectly neutral journolisming:
I will post the inevitable Greenwald video when it lands.
During Psaki’s White House tenure, Democrats saw her as a champion of their causes, while conservatives found her
combative and standoffisha smug, condescending, insufferable bitch, who secretly lusted after Pete Doocy.FTFY.
I thought she had been working for MSNBC all along.
White House, MSNBC; Can't tell the difference.
I think they share workspace and parking garage.
The White House is the media arm for MSNBC's policies.
Should be a seamless transition for Psaki, continuing to carry the Dem party's water in the propaganda department. The cable gig just has a higher salary and a longer future since it's hard to imagine the Dem party insiders (who seem to either think that they can keep Joe from getting into full rigor for a few more years or else limit their field of alternatives to two people that had a combined peak of 4% support in the 2020 primary) getting smart enough to allow a nominee that would be able to beat a 5 gal orange bucket from Home Depot in the 2024 election. It's as if those half-wits want another 4 years of trump, with the amount of work they're putting in to ensure they can't beat him again.
Just curious as to why anyone other than New Jersey residents should be concerned about this?
IL considered a bill banning self-service in 2020.
I think some Reason writers are in New York City, which from a suburb perspective means north Jersey as much the city itself. Probably feels like a bigger issue to them, just for proximity.
A lot of Jersians are leaving the state, and some are bringing their stupid ideas with them.
People in Oregon have been complaining about the self-serve law for the past 40 years. But their gas is still cheaper than California's, and someone has to pump it for you.
CA has 100 other laws designed to drive up the price of pretty much everything. If they can't figure out how to restrict the supply, they just tax it into oblivion (or in the case of energy, they actually do both).
"Progressive" governance is based on the theory that at some point they can increase the cost of operating any business to a level at which prices will come down, and that eventually inflation can be made high enough to become beneficial for poor people. It all seems to stem from the central premise that poverty will be eliminated entirely if only the cost of living can be increased sufficiently.
By the way, what's with the sexist headline?
Explained it in the article. The anti-self-serve crew's motto is "Jersey Girls Don't Pump Gas". Even linked to a bumper sticker with the slogan on it.
The whole point of the magnet [bumper sticker] is to make fun of it.
Seems to be more of a meme than any honest effort to organize against pumping your own. Found this on a radio website from 2016:
https://nj1015.com/the-8-dumbest-cliches-why-jersey-girls-wont-pump-their-own-gas/
What do Jersey girls pump then? Asking for a friend named Guido.
Sea Isle girls have no problem putting a nozzle in a hole.
Gotta admit, my exposure to Jersey Girls is mostly from Tom Waits songs and the Snookie parody in a South park episode. I'll defer to your learned opinion here.
Everything but gas, judging by the cast of Jersey Shore and Kevin Smith's movies.
Take a look at Mr. Equity over here.
I so would [sow wood] by the way.
You don't want a Jersey girl to break a nail pumping gas, do you? I used to work in NJ, a lot of them talk the feminine talk and you know the rest. Most of them are entitled divas.
Snooky comes to mind. But she is just too damned dumb to be trusted with a gas pump.
Would you trust anyone in the Jersey Shore cast to pump gas?
My favorite scene never filmed was from the modern 3 Stooges movie when Moe was living with the Jersey shore pack and he rips the nose hair out of Snooky.
Regulators should be regulated.
The prohibition of customers pumping their own gas as being dangerous, while in the presence of people across the USA pumping their own gas with no incidence, is an assessment of those customers as being incapable of handling it.
If Jersey girls don't pump gas, just what do they pump?
JOBS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Obligatory obscure song about New Jersey
<i<bans on self-service gas stations reduce supply and drive up prices
Really? Say it ain't so!
You can not possibly add the requirment of paying someone to pump gas for you without driving up the price. At least not in a universe where the First Law of Thermogodamics Applies.
Can we please have the preview back?????
And reduce the crap and page-shifting so that entering comments can be done with a bit less lag?
I'm OK with keeping full-service if only the attendants would wear spiffy caps and ties, salute when they approach the car, and if they would also check my oil and air up my tires for free.
I’m old enough to remember when two attendants would greet you at the pump. One would pump gas and check your tires while the other did the windows and checked the oil. That was a LONG time ago.
That number from the Oregon fire marshal is likely low. Self-service pumps need more complex fire suppression since there isn't an employee nearby to activate it. This shouldn't be a surprise, it's a well known cost of building self-serve stations and it's why most of them have a canopy over the pumps to contain the suppression system.
Having grown up in NJ, I concur with the bafflement about why anyone anywhere else would care. We like pork roll, too. Deal with it.
Does the bill require stations to provide self-service pumps? If not, how are costs associated with self-service stations relevant? Wouldn't individual companies decide whether the costs and benefits are worth it? Is the actual concern that full-service will not be offered if not mandated?
(I'm not especially invested in the issue - just curious about the rationale. Not an issue around these parts - I don't recall ever seeing a full-service station here.)
Arguing that it will cause the price to drop is a poor reason. This here's New Jersey, and No One is going to let a good reason to increase margins go unheeded. No One. The price will remain the same regardless.
If you believe otherwise, I've got a bridge to sell. Old, but well maintained...
More than likely you'd be required to pay a fee for an endorsement on your drivers license (of course after taking obligatory training for a fee) to be allowed to pump your own gas.
Probably true that the price wouldn't change. But instead of me sitting at the pump waiting for whoever still works at these stations to finally get to my vehicle to pump my gas, I could easily get out of the car and do it myself in a fraction of the time.
So Noo Joisey gas stations don't compete with each other? In every other state, all gas stations have the prices posted outside in large numerals, and if one station lowers its price by 1 cent, it will have customer cars lined up waiting for a pump to become available. If other stations want to actually sell gas instead of just pouring out money on overhead with none coming in, they'll lower their price to match - or, if they can afford it, go down 1 more cent, and get most of the business until their competitors figure a way to match that price and stay in business. It winds up with all of the stations in one area posting the same price, and none of them are making more than a slim profit after overhead and wages - because the overhead and wages go on whether or not any gas is selling, so a price that drives away customers is the fastest route to bankruptcy.
If an attendant adds to the cost, why is NJ gas lower priced?
Low taxes. They are probably over 50 cents a gallon in neighboring states.
I live in OR, I'd like to pump my own gas. Why would it cost ANY money to convert to self-service, even if it's just a portion of the pumps at any given station? You put up a "Self Service Only" sign and you're good to go. The pumps work the same as any other pump at any other gas station in the country.
Apparently Jersey Boys are wimps and can't pump gas either!
Lived in Oregon for a very long time. Whenever this topic would come up, the usual suspects would cry "What about the disabled?" "What about seniors?" "What about the rain?" not noticing that disabled seniors have been pumping their own gas in rainy states such as Washington for many decades.
The idea of choice is the enemy of coercive govt., the US political paradigm. The public, by voting, has chosen to NOT chose, i.e., to authorize an elite to choose for them, to rule them, to run their life, and rule those who don't vote, those who self-govern, voluntarists.
How do they justify this? They don't. They rely on force, not reason, rights, free choice.
The most dangerous thing I have ever seen at a gas station was done by the allegedly well trained professional attendant. Years ago I filled up in New Jersey, in a gas station that smelled of spilled gas, and the attend smoked a cigarette while pumping gas. I feel much safer doing it myself.
Gas, even the vapors, can't be ignited by a tobacco ember. It's not hot enough. Here's a controlled experiment on the subject, not just some randos experimenting on YouTube:
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10694-013-0380-3
Gas station workers, learn to code.
as a libertarian I should support self serve gas, as a nj resident there is nothing better in the dead of winter, cracking the window and saying fill it up and rolling the window back up, it is a small pleasure living in this state. these ideas of ending full serve only come in spring for some reason lol. also, I work with a few people who live in pa and they get their gas in nj because it is cheaper.
I've lived in northern Michigan, and I've pumped my own gas in 25-below weather. No problem, because I dress for the weather - otherwise you're likely to die when the car gets stuck or breaks down.
Compared to Michigan, NJ barely has winters - but because you're a wimp (and too stupid to be prepared), you support forcing everyone else to pay for and wait for full service. You're no libertarian.
"Jersey Girls don't pump gas" is a slightly off-color joke found on posters and bumper stickers. No one ever argued that was a reason to not change the law. Can't you guys take a joke?
By the way, the real reason there is resistance is the opposition of smaller gas station owners to competition from the larger stations that prefer self service for the lower employee costs. Whether that is a good reason or not is a separate question and while I understand the economic liberty argument, living in Jersey means I, a guy, don't have to pump gas either which I kind of like.
Small price to pay for whatever these idiots get out of it.