Buffalo Shooting Will Prompt Measures 'To Combat Domestic Terrorism,' Says Pelosi
Plus: Netflix defends artistic expression, perspectives on the baby formula shortage, and more...

Buffalo shooting prompts promises of new domestic terror legislation. A horrific mass shooting in Buffalo, New York, is bringing out some of people's worst political instincts.
On Saturday, 18-year-old Payton Gendron opened fire in and around a Tops supermarket, killing 10 people and wounding three others in a racially motivated act of violence that he broadcast live on Twitch. Gendron was taken into police custody, has been charged with murder, and pleaded not guilty.
Gendron apparently wrote a manifesto, and it's rife with white supremacist and antisemitic rhetoric, including heavy endorsement of the "replacement" theory. The idea guiding this conspiracy theory is that "many different kinds of social change are connected to a plot by a cabal of elites to eradicate the white race," as University of Chicago history professor Kathleen Belew described it to The New Yorker. "It connects things such as abortion, immigration, gay rights, feminism, residential integration—all of these are seen as part of a series of threats to the white birth rate."
While many are remembering and mourning the victims of Gendron's assault, some politicians and activists have been using the incident to score cheap political points and social media engagement. For instance:
- "In his manifesto, the white supremacist mass shooter…reveals that he was motivated to do so by the 'white replacement theory' that has been pushed by Trump. RT TO EXPOSE TRUMP!" tweeted the political action group Occupy Democrats. It was one of several similar tweets from them.
- "If, when a white supremacist commits a mass shooting or a constitutional right is taken away or an innocent black person is killed by a cop or a book is banned, you say, 'This is not who we are,' remember--this is exactly who the Republicans want us to be," tweeted Mary Trump, a niece of the former president who has been critical of him.
- "Our family is praying for the victims & families of the shootings this weekend and the severe mental health crisis in America," tweeted Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene—before quickly adding that America "should only be investing in our own people and our own problems."
Statements like these are extremely crass. But what's not just crass but dangerous are the attempts to use this tragedy to expand federal power.
In Washington, some Democrats are using the Buffalo shooting to push a counterterrorism agenda they had previously been connecting to the January 6 riot. Notably, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D–Calif.) said Congress would "consider additional measures to strengthen efforts to combat domestic terrorism."
"Pelosi offered no specifics," notes The New York Times. "But in April, Democrats on the House Judiciary passed a bill that would create permanent offices within the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice and FBI 'to monitor, investigate and prosecute cases of domestic terrorism.' The proposal would also increase training of local police forces to detect, deter and investigate homegrown terrorism."
In a vacuum, none of that may sound too bad. But the Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies have a long history of using terrorism—domestic or otherwise—to push heightened surveillance of activists, to justify mass spying on Americans, to increase censorship, and generally to serve as a reason to ignore civil liberties.
What Gendron did is abhorrent. But "violent acts are already illegal under existing law," as J.D. Tuccille noted during last year's push for a domestic terror laws. "New 'anti-terrorism' tools will inevitably be deployed against those who annoy whoever is currently in office."
FREE MINDS
Netflix defends pluralistic taste and creative output in a new memo on "artistic expression":
Not everyone will like—or agree with—everything on our service. While every title is different, we approach them based on the same set of principles: we support the artistic expression of the creators we choose to work with; we program for a diversity of audiences and tastes; and we let viewers decide what's appropriate for them, versus having Netflix censor specific artists or voices.
As employees we support the principle that Netflix offers a diversity of stories, even if we find some titles counter to our own personal values. Depending on your role, you may need to work on titles you perceive to be harmful. If you'd find it hard to support our content breadth, Netflix may not be the best place for you.
More on the decision here.
FREE MARKETS
Perspectives on the baby formula shortage. Writers from Reason and elsewhere have been exploring how federal policies have exacerbated the U.S. baby formula shortage:
A lot of people are missing the big picture on the baby formula shortage. This isn't just about potentially tainted formula & its recall….
— Elizabeth Nolan Brown (@ENBrown) May 13, 2022
• "How Bad Government Policy is Fueling the Infant Formula Shortage"
• "Rock‐a‐Bye Trade Restrictions on Baby Formula"
• "America's Infant Formula Crisis and the 'Resiliency' Mirage"
• "America's Trade and Regulatory Policies Have Contributed to the Baby Formula Shortage"
Rather than fix the policies that make importing foreign baby formula difficult, lawmakers are instead making noises about asking getting the Federal Trade Commission to intervene.
Meanwhile, former Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Chief Scott Gotlieb told Face the Nation that the agency "didn't exert all the oversight that they could have" at the U.S. facility where potentially tainted formula has caused a nationwide recall. "There were known problems with that facility going back many years or findings on previous inspections."
A study published in the Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition in 2019 found that 15 of 16 European formulas it looked at MET FDA NUTRITION REQUIREMENTS.
But "none met all FDA label requirements". So they're illegal here. https://t.co/Sy14j6m68G
— Elizabeth Nolan Brown (@ENBrown) May 13, 2022
The fact that potentially unsafe formula came from a U.S. plant while U.S. regulators may have been negligent makes the FDA's rejection of European Union baby formula especially ridiculous. The FDA thinks Americans need to be protected from European formula not because it doesn't meet nutritional or sanitation requirements but because the labels don't fit FDA standards.
QUICK HITS
• New research suggests that "people who are vaccinated and then get infected with omicron may be primed to overcome a broad range of coronavirus variants," Bloomberg reports.
• How did former governor of Texas Rick Perry become a major advocate for psychedelics?
• U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement "has spent $2.8 billion since 2008 developing surveillance and facial-recognition capabilities, mostly in secrecy and without real oversight," reports Reason's C.J. Ciaramella.
• Bad immigration policy is driving a lifeguard shortage:
Unbelievable. Our horror story immigration laws are a direct threat to Americans this summer because we can't possibly let foreign lifeguards fill these positions. How many people even know the Obama admin capped the Summer Work Travel Program? https://t.co/JpeF35iOw4.
— David J. Bier (@David_J_Bier) May 14, 2022
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Buffalo shooting prompts promises of new domestic terror legislation.
Please tell me they didn't engineer this one.
I've noticed that in nearly 100% of these cases, either the feds missed a ton of obvious signs that the guy was planning this, or the feds engineered it themselves.
Couple of stories pointed out yesterday that he had already been investigated once for making threatening statements about doing a school shooting, and was sent for a mental health evaluation.
Yeah, I saw that too. Seems like there definitely is a common thread with these shooters. Young guys, make previous posts on social media about their plans, acquire weapons, but have no previous record, and described by classmates or neighbors as quiet but generally nice. My guess is a lot of them are on the autism spectrum.
The guy also wore a hazmat suit to class. But of course in this day and age, where kids can switch genders every day, maybe that’s not considered abnormal.
Wearing a hazmat suit is just a free speech protest against mandating ineffective masks.
Home income solution to enable everyone to work online and receive weekly payments to bank acc. Earn over $500 every day and get payouts every week straight to account bank. (rrt28) My last month of income was $30,390 and all I do is work up to 4 hours a day on my computer. Easy work and steady income are great with this job.
.
More information. >> https://brilliantfuture01.blogspot.com/
Yeah, but to be fair, the class was Furries 101. He just didn't get it.
Most of the MSM reporting on the shooter are glossing over the fact that he claimed to be "radicalized" online and he gives his timeline of 2 years for radicalization, which coincides with the school disruptions due to the shut downs.
Based on that information, it looks to me like a young kid, possibly mentally ill or possibly ASD, had a whole lot of idle time with nothing better to do than surf 4chan and get indoctrinated with terrible stuff.
There will be no introspection on any of it, of course. It's much easier to blame Tucker Carlson, who the shooter doesn't even mention in his manifesto.
There isn't a dime's worth of difference between this guy and the Syrian Arab who shot up the grocery store in Boulder.
No surprise that the media immediately stopped sensationalizing the latter about 5 minutes after the facts about the guy came out.
No lie. I was unaware of the Boulder shooter until someone cited it yesterday.
Or the Waukesha red suv accident?
Everyone knows how dangerous red SUVs are.
It's relative, a red minivan, is causing Asian hate crimes accidents in Dallas.
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/tasneemnashrulla/dallas-shootings-asian-hate-crime-connected
Don't know why they haven't been recalled. Thousands of these things lurking in the shadows waiting to pounce.
Lots of kids and teens were shut in at home during the pandemic. But some of them were still part of a functioning family unit. The others not as much, and that's been a trend in this country.
The shutdown only amplified problems that were developing well before the pandemic. And all these isolated incels and whackos saw NOTHING but constant strife, division, and name calling between factions all throughout the pandemic. The nation had no moment of levity or unity. Nothing on tv or movie or music provided any sort of relief. They were stewing in their little cocoon as society tells him to either fight or that he's a bigot.
America is a country that waxes beautiful poetics about mental health but yells at and shames anyone that deviates from the orthodoxy of the ruling class. It's just freaking amazing what the woke crowd picks up the torches and pitchforks over.
Sure - but how many people exhibit these signs but don't ever do anything?
If only 1:1000 shitposters do anything . . .
Or - and I direct this at those who are pro-red flag laws - maybe the 'early warning signs' aren't actually all that obvious?
Even if "early warning signs" were obvious, it shouldn't matter. There's no way to predict accurately whether a person who shows "warning signs" will ever act on them, and we can't restrict people's rights based on something they *might* do.
Where are the new laws to combat this?
Chicago shootings: 33 shot, 5 fatally, in weekend violence, CPD says
https://abc7chicago.com/chicago-shooting-weekend-violence-crime-police/11855997/
No new laws needed they are not being enforced due to equity
Shooting people is already illegal.
As is being a felon in possession of a firearm. I wonder how many of those cases they have dropped in the last 5 years?
Look, it's way more important for Groot to be in Texas right now, performatively reading a 'banned' book (there is no such thing in the US).
That, ironically, was 'banned, in CA schools by the Democratic CA government.
Groot? From Guardians of the Galaxy? But wouldn't Rocket Raccoon be at risk for getting runned over by a damned ol' F-150 in Texas? 🙂
They didn't have to engineer it. They guy was known to law enforcement as a threat. But the cops are too busy monitoring soccer moms who show up at school board meetings to have any time left for stopping mass murderers. And here we are with another Reichstag fire.
More laws will stop people who ignore the law from doing bad things.
Pretty soon, it will be against the law to break the law.
There oughta be a law!
Against people saying "There oughta be a law"
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/there-oughta-be-a-law
I wrote about that! 🙂
The danger to Americans is not domestic terrorism.
The real danger to Americans is federal government over-reaction, leading to Americans losing more individual liberties.
State governments are hardly blameless.
Correct.
That's the way it goes. Someone else does something bad, I have to pay for it for the rest of my life. So politicians can say they did something.
that sounds pretty domestically terrorismy to me.
That last bit is actual domestic terrorism, you know.
Fourth
"In his manifesto, the white supremacist mass shooter…reveals that he was motivated to do so by the 'white replacement theory' that has been pushed by Trump. RT TO EXPOSE TRUMP!" tweeted the political action group Occupy Democrats...'
See? See? I told you it was Trump's fault!
I would like to see some when / where / how evidence that Trump did anything of the sort. Some people will believe any damned thing if it aligns with their politics.
You could have twittered that the lunar eclipse last night was due to Trump nuking the moon>/b> and allegedly legitimate journalists would have been running that story uncritically this morning.
Remember when trump tricked all of the media and Gov agencies by saying the Wuhan virus could have come from a lab? After that any mention of a lab leak was a conspirisy theory
Honestly, if I was a GOP president, I'd deliberately troll the media by promoting common-sense recommendations so that they'd write full-page "fact checks" disputing them. Stuff like, "look both ways before crossing the street," "don't drink and drive," "exercise and eat healthy foods," "don't play with loaded guns." The full-throated "ACKSHULLEEE" remonstrations would be worth it.
or you could pass an EO that says "no pedophilia" and watch them lose their minds over an unfair law while also telling you there is no reason for it because pedophilia just isnt happening
Remember all the anti-Asian hate he inspired by saying that? I'm surprised there are any Asians left after he used such disinformation.
I'm sure Trump is the reason an Asian guy shot up an Asian church the other day. Internized anti-Asian hate.
*Internalized
Look at how many young black men are killed by other young black men who happen to be white supremacists every year. It's a crazy world that Trump led us to.
*Internetized
Virginia public schools to expel students who don't use proper pronouns.
https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/16/fairfax-virginia-schools-may-expel-elementary-students-for-misgendering-people/
Question how this does not violate the First Amendment. Even school kids have some rights.
Especially when they’re speaking the truth.
There is no moral mechanism to justify making 100% truthful speech illegal.
But we're already there. For example in advertising for smokeless tobacco products.
When words are violence they are not protected.
Because words are violence, and using a single wrong word makes bureaucrats fear for a students safety. The overwrought crybullying serves a purpose, in that as long as you don't break character, you give legal justification for bureaucrats to punish people for disagreeing with you.
If I am ever required to state my preferred pronouns they are He-Man/ master of the universe
I was thinking of making mine; "I'm a complete idiot" and then get pissed off when people don't use it.
I like that.
I kind of want to make up something spelled weird, then get mad when everyone mispronounces it, even though I won't tell them how to pronounce it properly.
Like the the Muppets, when the producer, whose name sounded like Pah Che spelled it Pizza.
The SCOTUS established a long time ago that public schools don’t have to allow free speech. This was in the 1970s and again about 20 years ago when a kid at an Alaska high school got suspended for making a sign that said “bong hits for Jesus”
True NOVANick but schools also can not compel speech thats why they can no longer force kids to say the pledge of alligence
Good point-requiring pronouns definitely is compelled speech
What has that got to do with anything?
That is such a dishonest framing of the issue.
From your article:
Legally meaningless offenses such as “malicious misgendering” and “outing related to gender identification” would be now punishable by up to “Level 4” sanctions. It’s the last level before penalties for drug dealing, rape, and homicide.
Level 4 is the punishment meted out for assault and battery, drug consumption, theft, and arson. These penalties may be applied even to kindergarteners and include, at their worst, expulsion at the behest of the school board.
Oh man, scary, right? That framing certainly leads one to the impression that the Fairfax County School Board are full of such woke whackos that they think misgendering is as severe of an offense as arson! What kind of woke morons do you have to be to believe that????
But wait, if you actually go to the disciplinary document in question (helpfully linked to in the article itself), you'll see that ALMOST ALL of the offenses listed can be punishable "up to Level 4". That is because, evidently based on the way the system is set up in Virginia, school administrators have a great deal of flexibility to decide on an appropriate punishment. So theoretically, almost anything can be treated as if it were a very severe offense. So, for example, in Fairfax, Virginia, a dress code violation can ALSO be punished "up to Level 4", equivalent to arson and theft. "Speaking to another in an uncivil, discourteous manner" can ALSO be punished "up to Level 4", equivalent to arson and theft.
But you would not know that from reading the article, because the article lies by omission in how it chooses to frame the issue. It is trying to scare you, not to inform you.
So it is not true that the Fairfax County School Board has specifically decided to punish the offense of "malicious misgendering" as severely as arson or theft. They have instead added the offense of "malicious misgendering" to the list of all of the other offenses in an appropriate spot. They added it to the category called "Relationship Behaviors (RB) which create a
negative relationship between two or more members of the
school community (No physical harm is done)", along with other offenses such as "Using slurs based upon the actual or perceived religion" (which by the way may ALSO be punished "up to Level 4").
But it doesn't sound nearly as scary or fear-inducing to say "OMG those Fairfax crazies want to regard the offense of 'misgendering' as equivalent to a malicious slur!" Which, IF you regard 'misgendering' as a type of offensive slur, kinda makes sense.
To be clear: what this article's author is NOT trying to do is to make the case that 'misgendering' shouldn't be an offense at all. Instead, the author is trying to make the case that "the Left is overreaching!" but in a deceptive and dishonest manner. This is a common tactic that you see in the partisan media: they deliberately avoid trying to make the case that their point of view is meritorious, instead they just lazily try to claim THE OTHER SIDE SUCKS! and usually dishonestly, as in this case.
And people like Jesse fall for it every time.
Eat lead, totalitarian groomer
"Totalitarian groomer". I'm stealing this, thank you.
It's ok because Fairfax whackos already overreact to everything else?
Is that your final answer?
No, I am saying that within the disciplinary system that already exists at Fairfax County schools - which is a statewide disciplinary system, by the way - that grants wide latitude to administrators to decide on punishment for offenses, and IF you believe that 'malicious misgendering' ought to be an offense, then the Fairfax County Board treated that offense in a reasonable manner, placing it in a category along with other offenses having to do with malicious slurs.
Now, should administrators have such wide latitude to decide on punishments for these offenses? That's a completely valid question. It's hard for me to imagine a case where, say, a dress code violation ought to be punished as severely as arson. But that is not the argument being made in this article.
And, should "malicious misgendering" be regarded as an offense at all? Again that's a totally valid question. But the author was NOT even trying to address that question at all. The author was, dishonestly and deceptively, trying to go with "they are overreaching because they are woke whackos!" which, upon closer inspection, turned out not to be the case.
Youre defending it on the basis of they may not go to level 4 even the policy says they can.
Youre equating words to physical violence which is what level 4 calls for.
Lol.
Please keep defending critical theories and indoctrination jeff.
You seem very vested in defending all actions the teams take to force compliance of their beliefs.
FYI Jeff's preferred pronouns are paid sophist/disingenuous shit.
Nice
The entire thing is outrageous, but you fixated on the “framing”.
His entire argument is the same used by apologists for the surveillance state--"Just because they have the capability doesn't mean they're going to use it!"
The article goes after his lefty boos in Fairfax County, so of course he's rising to their defense with his typical sophistry.
...but if I am able to dictate my own pronouns and it's a violation to not use the pronouns that I dictated...
What if my pronoun is actually a malicious slur?
"HCIC or Head Cracka in Charge" has a nice ring.
All of which is beside the point. As linked in the article, 3 middle school boys in Wisconsin are being charged with sexual harassment for refusing to call a girl they/them. Of course neither word has any gender associated with it and using either to describe an individual is grammatically incorrect. You continually come here to defend lunatics.
Umm... the cited portion of your post stated that misgendering is the same level of punishment meted out as for physical assault.
How do you think that makes the rest of your screed in any way valid?
I know you have a seemingly vested interest in protecting all critical theory, but the fact you ignore evidence before you because the worst possible thing hasn't happened yet just shows you to be a leftist defending their ideology.
Your ebasically defending words as violence jeff.
But please continue to lie you don't support public school indoctrination.
misgendering is the same level of punishment meted out as for physical assault.
As I point out, that is a very deceptive way to describe it. Based on the disciplinary standards, virtually EVERY offense *can* be treated as severely as a physical assault. Even for very minor things like dress code violations. So there is nothing remarkable or special about 'misgendering' in that sense. If your problem is that misgendering is being considered an offense at all, then make that case. If your problem is that the administrators have too much latitude to decide on punishments of offenses generally, then make that case. But that is not what you, or the article, chose to do. You chose to try to scare people with lies and deception instead of honestly making a cogent argument. That is the basis of my criticism.
It is not deceptive you leftist shit.
You have used the term chilling effect prior. You know what it means.
Yet you defend its use here.
Are words the same as physical violence, yes or no?
So tell me this- when the first kid is expelled for mis-gendering someone, will you admit your error, or will you just memory-hole it?
I ask, because I couldn't help but notice you were silent last week when people pointed out that, in fact, the Garland letter sent to the DOJ resulted in far more than "just meetings", as you insisted for months. We now see that multiple parents are being tracked in a national threat tracking database. A mother was visited by the FBI merely because she told a school board "we are coming for you" in the next election.
This comes on the heels of you denying that CRT or Queer Theory nonsense was being taught in schools, only to be shown by Reason quoting the teachers themselves that it is being taught, and then retreating to an "kids should be exposed to many ideas" argument that again denies what is actually happening (kids are being told these "ideas" are the sole truth). Again and again, you deny what is happening to people who actually pay more attention to this shit than you. Again and again your denials are revealed as nothing more than the obfuscatory hopes of someone who really, really, really doesn't like the right- even if that always means letting the left get away with terrible, anti-liberty acts.
Compelling speech through threats is unconstitutional, whether it includes detention or expulsion. You know damn well this is an intimidation effort, and your attempts to obfuscate it rings as hollow as your protestations around the Garland letter.
A good time to remind people that chemtard complained that the fine against Oberlin for fomenting a mob and trying to destroy the livelihood of the Gibson's Bakery owners was too high.
There's no leftist cause he won't simp for if he thinks it's hurting right-wingers.
So tell me this- when the first kid is expelled for mis-gendering someone, will you admit your error, or will you just memory-hole it?
That would depend on the specifics of the case, wouldn't you think?
I ask, because I couldn't help but notice you were silent last week when people pointed out that, in fact, the Garland letter sent to the DOJ resulted in far more than "just meetings", as you insisted for months. We now see that multiple parents are being tracked in a national threat tracking database. A mother was visited by the FBI merely because she told a school board "we are coming for you" in the next election.
As is usually the case these days, my complaint in that issue was the absurd, hyperbolic overreaction on the part of Team Red to what Garland actually did. When he put his memo out, more than a few people claimed that this was proof that HE'S TARGETING PARENTS WHO PROTEST AT SCHOOL BOARD MEETINGS. And I pointed out, correctly, that all he did was issue a memo that instructed the FBI to hold meetings. That is literally all it was. And no I don't have a problem with the FBI or any other organization deciding to hold meetings.
And now, we have this 'whistleblower email'. Ignoring Jim Jordan's bluster, this is what the email actually says in relevant part:
"As a result, the Counterterrorism and Criminal Divisions created a threat tag, EDUOFFICIALS, to track instances of related threats. We ask that your offices apply the threat tag to investigations and assessments of threats specifically directed against school board administrators, board members, teachers, and staff. The purpose of the threat tag is to help scope this threat on a national level and provide an opportunity for comprehensive analysis of the threat picture for effective engagement with law enforcement partners at all levels."
So, I want to ask you, Overt: What is your *SPECIFIC* complaint about _this email_? Not what you THINK they MIGHT do. Not some slippery slope fantasy. This specific email with these specific words.
As I mention below, I want libertarian critiques of state power to have merit and to be worth reading. I want us to be the sane and rational ones, compared to Team Red which is more and more going off the paranoid deep end every day. So, is it POSSIBLE that Garland is going to start arresting every parent protesting at a school board meeting? Sure, it's possible. Does the EVIDENCE currently in our possession demonstrate that this is going to happen? The answer is no. And if we start going around saying "OMG THEY'RE GONNA ARREST PARENTS FOR SPEAKING OUT", without any firm evidentiary basis for that claim, it makes us look like the crazy ones.
And I am just not interested in getting into the CRT crap yet again. Suffice it to say that the claim "(kids are being told these "ideas" are the sole truth)" is stealing a base.
Compelling speech through threats is unconstitutional,
And now finally we have a rational libertarian argument against 'malicious misgendering'. Wouldn't it have been nice if the article Jesse linked to had actually made that argument, instead of trying to use deceptive scare tactics?
“That would depend on the specifics of the case, wouldn't you think?”
There it is folks. Right after arguing it’s disingenuous to say it could happen.
"When he put his memo out, more than a few people claimed that this was proof that HE'S TARGETING PARENTS WHO PROTEST AT SCHOOL BOARD MEETINGS. "
He *was* targeting parents who protest at school board meetings. We know that because FBI Whistleblowers have now released information saying that Parents were added to the threat tracking databases and visited by FBI agents merely for PROTESTING AT SCHOOL BOARD MEETINGS.
It wasn't hyperbole, Chemjeff. What people worried about actually happened.
"And I pointed out, correctly, that all he did was issue a memo that instructed the FBI to hold meetings"
No, you were not correct. As was stated *multiple* times to you, the language of the letter and the press release was that the DOJ would begin investigating ways to deal with these threats. Not just meeting about them. And we know that parents have been visited by the FBI about it.
"So, I want to ask you, Overt: What is your *SPECIFIC* complaint about _this email_?"
It is odd that you only want to talk about one email...You know, not the fact that the FBI has now at least three cases of investigating people for mere protest.
https://news.yahoo.com/fbi-whistleblowers-claim-agents-investigated-024910174.html
"So, is it POSSIBLE that Garland is going to start arresting every parent protesting at a school board meeting? Sure, it's possible."
Now who is getting into hyperbole? The complaint has specifically been that the DOJ is trying to chill the free speech of parents. And it is obvious that they are doing it. When you threaten to replace a School Board and you are visited by the FBI a few days later, it has a chilling effect.
Your methods are clear. You parse and dissemble for Garland and then just completely make up the position of Team Red. You aren't credible on this, and your attempt to carry water yet again for your preferred Team Blue is transparent to everyone.
He *was* targeting parents who protest at school board meetings.
Based on the original memo? No he wasn't.
We know that because FBI Whistleblowers have now released information saying that Parents were added to the threat tracking databases and visited by FBI agents merely for PROTESTING AT SCHOOL BOARD MEETINGS.
No, that misrepresents even the three cases you are referring to. First, it should be pointed out that for those three cases, we only have one side of the story. Wouldn't it be better to have a more complete understanding of the entire situation?
Furthermore, even among those three:
The first was a borderline threat ("we are coming for you").
In the second, the FBI interviewed *the tipster*, not the parents.
In the third, the FBI got dragged into a local Democrat vs. Republican politician squabble, not about protesting parents.
If this is some Orwellian plot to stifle dissent, they are doing a very bad job of it.
You talk about chilling speech. Be honest - which is more likely to chill speech, what the FBI is *actually* doing, or the right-wing exaggeration about what the FBI is doing? Sure, if I thought the FBI was knocking on the door of every parent who ever showed up to protest at a school board meeting, I might think twice about going to a meeting myself. That isn't what is happening, but if you listen to right-wing media, you'd be forgiven if that was the impression you got.
You want to know what I see? I don't see impending fascism stifling dissent. What I see is a gigantic waste of time. The FBI should not be getting involved in these local issues, it has better things to do. This is a political stunt on the part of Team Blue to try to improve their standing among their teacher union base. That is what this is. Not Orwell come to life.
It is odd that you only want to talk about one email...
No no, Overt. It's not just "one email". It is THE email which the whistleblower submitted. Again I ask, what is your *specific* complaint regarding the *actual words* in the email?
You are trying to substitute paranoia for reason, and that has got to end.
"...we only have one side of the story. Wouldn't it be better to have a more complete understanding of the entire situation?"
Why should there even be another side to the story? It shouldn't even be something we are discussing in a free society.
It's not like people haven't gotten heated at school board meetings in the past. It should be a wholly local investigation, if any investigation is warranted at all.
It's not like people haven't gotten heated at school board meetings in the past. It should be a wholly local investigation, if any investigation is warranted at all.
I completely agree. The FBI should not be involved with investigating local matters, it is a waste of time.
BUT, since the FBI already did investigate those three cases that Overt linked to, if we are going to discuss whether the FBI had some rational basis for their investigations, then in order to form a firm conclusion, I'd like to know the entire story, not just what one Team Red politician said about them.
And what I and others are saying is that there is no rational basis for the FBI to be investigating local school board meeting attendees, so the rest of the story is moot and asking for it makes you look like you're running cover for the people responsible.
"Based on the original memo? No he wasn't."
Chemjeff: "Garland wasn't cynically trying to chill the free speech of parents by turning their local protests into federal matters, investigated and tracked by the FBI. He said so in his memo!"
Also Chemjeff: "All those politicians and parents aren't actually protesting CRT or extreme trans ideology in schools- no they are racist, anti homosexual bigots using code to push their agenda!"
Who are you kidding? The appropriate response from Garland should have been, "We view these as local matters that should be dealt with by local law enforcement." Everyone, including Reason who commented on it at the time, knows that the only reason to begin meeting (and telling boards to report info to the federal authorities, and setting up tracking for these threats) was to do more than "meet about it".
Everyone knows this, because we all now know that the ENTIRE situation was created BY THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION. They went to the President of the NSBA and privately solicited the public letter that would be pretext for their action. This was a *deliberate* effort by the Biden Administration to turn a local case into a federal case.
That isn't hyperbole. That's facts.
"No, that misrepresents even the three cases you are referring to...."The first was a borderline threat ("we are coming for you")."
This is what you are going with? "We are coming for you" is a threat worthy of FBI visits? It would not have been worth a visit from a local police officer. They had no justifiable reason to believe "we are coming for you" is a threat of force.
I don't know if it is your partisan blinders, or just your stubborn pride making you so unwilling to admit error. But doubling down on this is not a good look for someone who claims to want good libertarian critiques of government. For the record: Reason- the libertarians- critiqued this with the same rationale.
"Be honest - which is more likely to chill speech, what the FBI is *actually* doing, or the right-wing exaggeration about what the FBI is doing? "
No. The fault lies with Garland and the Biden administration. We know for a fact that they intentionally created a national issue out of this. If there is any uncertainty about this *at all* it is the fault of Garland who very simply should have said "Never mind, this is a local matter that requires no involvement from the Biden administration."
Did you know that the vast, vast majority of police encounters, including among Black men, result in no violence or harm to either party? Are we to say that Reason, and Democrats calling out examples of Black men being killed by cops is somehow the cause of Blacks being afraid of Cops?
"And I am just not interested in getting into the CRT crap yet again. Suffice it to say that the claim "(kids are being told these "ideas" are the sole truth)" is stealing a base."
SUffice it to say I have given you proof numerous times. Here is an example of Reason reporting on it:
https://reason.com/2022/01/31/critical-race-theory-taught-in-classroom-california/
I recall a recent conversation where you said "Oh yeah, so you found an example." So you *know* that this is happening in schools, and yet every time you show up on these threads you are waving your hands and declaring "Nothing to see here."
So again, either cop to being wrong, or go silent again for a week or two. But acting like you have no information that this is actually happening in school after being presented with evidence numerous times makes persons like myself believe you are being disingenuous.
He is dishonest. Not disingenuous.
And even below he waded into racial discussions. He isnt avoiding them.
Lying Jeffy lies. It’s what he does.
Why do you guys even engage him. He's completely dishonest and not worth your time. Just mute him and move on.
I just enjoy pointing out what a liar he is.
I'm not saying "nothing to see here", that is a mischaracterization. On the other hand, I am deeply skeptical of right-wing demagogues' characterization of what is actually happening in school. Chris Rufo himself admitted that he deliberately changed the definition of CRT to encompass all the bad stuff about race that he didn't like, and he just used the term "CRT" as a vehicle for all that.
The question at hand is whether kids at schools are taught that "CRT" (whatever it is) is being taught as the ONE AND ONLY way to examine issues of race and power. I still find that to be a questionable claim. Even in your article that you cited that is not stated. Merely doing an exercising involving a CRT-like framework is not the same as saying "this is THE ONLY framework". And I am absolutely not going to trust any right-wing article on the subject, they have just lied way too much on this issue to be trustworthy in my view. I suppose somewhere there is probably one school that is "indoctrinating kids into CRT". And if they are doing that, then that's wrong and I don't support that.
I think you and I both agree that CRT as a general subject should not be banned from the classroom, but instead that it should be taught as one framework among many to understand issues of race and privilege and power. Maybe you might actually pipe up in support of that idea from time to time.
"I'm not saying "nothing to see here", that is a mischaracterization. On the other hand, I am deeply skeptical of right-wing demagogues' characterization of what is actually happening in school. "
No you are deliberately downplaying actual evidence. You are still here insisting that Garland's letter was benign, when we know that it was part of an orchestrated message where the Biden administration SOLICITED a national organization for a letter so that it would have a public reason to federalize this matter. This isn't right wing punditry. It is what happened.
And now we know that the FBI is actually investigating these cases. Cases that should have been local matters. Cases that the Biden administration moved to the federal level according to the orchestrated scheme above.
But this is, of course, like everything from you. The left is actually infringing on peoples' liberties- investigating their private speech, mandating vaccinations and masks- and once again, you don't care because some people on the right might actually be exaggerating things.
One can reasonably conclude that you don't actually care about infringements on liberty- but instead maybe the Right winning a victory in correcting them.
Cancer gonna cancer
And you think that administrators having the ability to charge minor infractions as equivalent to assault and battery - but sometimes choose not to somehow invalidates the point
Because it doesn't. It just extends it.
I know I keep harping on this, but it really seems like you can't help yourself but to not only take the side of the government at face value, and you only seem to have a critical eye if the government action was pushed or promoted by a Republican.
Which would be fine, if you didn't also try to insist that you don't do it when anyone can read your posts.
In regards to this, The Left (who wholly own the education establishment in Fairfax, if not the state) is indeed overreaching. Just as they've overreached with the rest of their stated policy that allows them to elevate anything they want to the same level as physical violence.
This is patently stupid and a slap in the face to student's liberty. Under no circumstance should a dress code violation ever be able to be punished at the same level as arson or theft.
I know I keep harping on this, but it really seems like you can't help yourself but to not only take the side of the government at face value, and you only seem to have a critical eye if the government action was pushed or promoted by a Republican.
I want criticism of the government's actions to be based on FACT and REASON and LOGIC. Not paranoid hyperbolic drivel. Not endless appeals to the slippery slope fallacy.
We libertarians undermine our own credibility when everything that the government does is treated as if it were the imminent arrival of fascism. Everyone else rightfully then tune us out as a bunch of paranoid whackos.
I want libertarian critiques of state power to have merit and to be worth reading.
Nobody believes your lies here.
I get it. I do. I just think that the critiques of state power we see posted by commenters here have merit and are worth reading. Even SQRLSY when he's trying to make an actual point and not copypasta idiocy.
And I will say, Fascism arrived 100 years ago. I'm not trying to be hyperbolic about this, I'm saying that the textbook definition of fascism was absolutely pushed by FDR and his New Deal policies.
Talk about how J6 was an attempted insurrection again Jeff.
Pathetic.
get your kids out of public school. problem solved.
Biden quietly removed 5 terrorist groups from list on late Friday.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/biden-to-remove-5-extremist-groups-from-foreign-terrorist-list
Don't worry he will replace it by naming institute for justice, Pacific legal foundation, the nra, orthodox jews, and Christians as terrorists to watch
Good morning Peanuts! Have you checked the value of your portfolio recently? I suggest doing it right now. This Biden economy is so good I bet your investments are at an all-time high. If not, your financial advisor must be a Republican who's deliberately sabotaging you just to make Biden look bad.
#BestEconomyEver
#TemporarilyFillingInForButtplug
I checked. I'm still a multithousandaire.
I haven't checked my 401k recently, but I do know that it cost me $75 to fill up my little Mazda over the weekend.
But think of the environment, and if you can't afford it, then buy a new Tesla S.
A real American would go for an electric Hummer made with union labor. Don't drive a Tesla made by people being paid slave wages.
F-150. $110. Good thing I can work from home most days.
An article on the foolishness of collectivism.
https://mises.org/library/fallacy-collectivism
Ironically it's a commenter with "radical individualist" in his name who convinced me collectivism is good, at least as it relates to race. In fact chemjeff has emerged as Reason's leading advocate for an explicitly race-based curriculum in American public schools.
#LibertariansForCRT
Skin color is the most important thing
You can't do equity while being color blind. Equity is King.
Netflix is well positioned to appeal to broad tastes. Being a catalogue of videos means that they can provide content for multiple demographics, and not being reliant on advertisers, means that left leaning demographics have to threaten them directly. Which is much easier to defend against, as you can easily see from the bottom line that that the threats are all bark with no power behind them.
Companies are more afraid of their employees now than potential customer boycotts.
Fucking stupid. I understand being afraid of workers striking for higher pay, but the fact that they have let SJW's tell them what to do, even against the company's interest means they deserve to go broke.
The general problem is that SJWs have weaponized the Discrimination and Harassment systems inside corporations. Don't like CRT? Better be very careful about how you disagree, as it might be bordering on hostile work environment.
HR = commissar
Gendron apparently wrote a manifesto, and it's rife with white supremacist and antisemitic rhetoric, including heavy endorsement of the "replacement" theory. The idea guiding this conspiracy theory is that "many different kinds of social change are connected to a plot by a cabal of elites to eradicate the white race," as University of Chicago history professor Kathleen Belew described it to The New Yorker.
Conspiracy theory? All I know about that is that this country was 90%+ white when I was born, and it's about 60% white now and dropping fast.
That doesn't just happen. Whether or not you want to credit a "conspiracy", that only happens by design. Somebody asked for that, and it wasn't me. What do you expect people to think?
Fuck off, troll
Correction: Fuck Off, Witch-Burning Nazi Troll! FTFY.
Skin color is the most important thing
To those who can think inly skin deep, like our newest troll.
Sounds like you were both after they reclassified Italians as white rather than their traditional racial classification of "a' spicy a'meatball."
Lol, Latinos are almost 100% white by census standards. If Greeks and dagos can be white, I don't see why Mexicans can't.
And... for some reason they aren't counted as native Americans either. White and black Hispanics.
Lol, Latinos are almost 100% white by census standards.
They used to be. They've been able to distinguish themselves by ethnicity for quite a while, though.
Most Hispanics think it's pretty stupid that they get lumped in with white people on the census, though. The Chicano pride types are particularly hostile to the idea and want it changed because they absolutely loath white people.
Don't worry, white people will absorb some, if not all, Hispanics just like we did Italians, Greeks, and those dirty Irish Catholics. Will that make you feel better?
As one of those dirty Irish Catholics, it's funny to me to see the woke types both claim that until relatively recently we weren't white *and* that we still shouldn't claim any oppression points *and* that we're still responsible for slavery, Jim Crow, etc., even though my people got here roughly 100 years or so ago. Not that I want any woke points, and I love jokes about the Irish, but oppressors? We just don't have that level of commitment.
The cabal of elites are white. They are not going to erase themselves.
I don’t even have to go back to when I was a kid! A couple months ago I was super white, now after spending some time outside this spring I’m a brown body!
I'd like to thank the posters who took the trouble to stop by and slag my post. Also to note not one of you was willing or able to offer a rebuttal.
Liberals are liberals.
I was agreeing with you!
Frankly, I don't give a damn what color someone's skin is. I care about individual rights and private property. The only way we can all get along peacefully is if those are protected.
...some politicians and activists have been using the incident to score cheap political points and social media engagement.
If I ever die from a wedge issue, please put my casket in the stack that whatever politician is standing on to get in front of the most cameras.
Netflix defends pluralistic taste and creative output...
THERE BETTER BE A 'BUT' COMING.
Are you surprised that no one wants to talk about their big buts when there's a Fist of Etiquette in the room?
THAT BUT BETTER COME, TOO.
Just don’t come with but butter.
Funny how ENB didn't mention the part where the shooter self-IDs as a leftist authoritarian.
It's easier to blame Trump and muh whyt supremahsee when you leave out all the inconvenient details.
Not funny, because she is actually a far left progressive.
"In his manifesto, the white supremacist mass shooter…reveals that he was motivated to do so by the 'white replacement theory' that has been pushed by Trump. RT TO EXPOSE TRUMP!" tweeted the political action group Occupy Democrats. It was one of several similar tweets from them.
Weird how you snuck in the leftist narrative trying to link the shooter to trump and the right (merely calling it crass instead of unsupported) while failing to mention he states he was a communist who moved slightly right to become a moderate left authoritarian.
The irony of the focus on replacement theory is that it shares the same base components as CRT, celebrated by jeff and other democrats.
CRT relies heavily on the idea that institutions are set up to protect a white supremacy that is slowly becoming the minority. This is the reflection of the replacement theory from the other direction. But these facts are ignored when discussing the racism inherent on the left which promulgated much of the current racial conflict.
It's not weird at all- ENB is an evil clump of cancer
while failing to mention he states he was a communist who moved slightly right to become a moderate left authoritarian.
Considering the parts of the video that did make it online busted him as a degenerate who consooooooooomed furry pr0n, his politics probably shouldn't be too shocking.
Mental health issues are far more prominent on the left as well.
Politics aside, modern western society is clearly not a healthy environment for producing stable people. It's internalized far too much of the marxist pretense that we're entitled to the garden of eden just for being born, and that anything which supposedly prevents this from existing needs to be destroyed.
Look at these mass shooters, and almost to a person they're hooked on some kind of drug that fucks up their capability to distinguish right from wrong. Instead of fixing society so that it's less atomized, we drug ourselves and our kids in to a stupor, and then act surprised when the drugs don't actually prevent psychotic behavior from taking place.
End result of the participation trophy mindset. More kids state they want to be social media influencers now on job surveys than want to do meaningful work.
Look on the label of any psychotropic drug and its likely that one of the potential side effects will be a psychotic breakdown.
It is not CRT as celebrated by Jeff and other, but rather CRT as defined by Jesse. Equating CRT with Replacement Theory is nonsense, but the type of equivalency that right winders make all the time. The fact is that CRT is a high-level legal theory that is based on facts, while Replacement Theory is a conspiracy with facts optional.
The fact is that CRT is a high-level legal theory that is based on facts, while Replacement Theory is a conspiracy with facts optional.
CRT isn't any "high-level legal theory" nor is it based on facts--it's just marxism packaged within a box of paranoid racial grievances against white people, with circular reasoning as its foundation.
"high-level legal theory"
That means bullshit entirely too difficult for the lying pile of lefty shit to figure out.
Tell me you've never investigated CRT without telling me.
^^^
This is what everyone thought
CRT = postmodern nazism.
"The fact is that CRT is a high-level legal theory that is based on facts"
bah-loney!
CRT seeks to overturn the melting pot, meritocracy, and color blind aspects of a liberal society and replace it with social classes based on skin color. Then it ascribes victimhood to everyone except the majority white population that it labels, even the most open minded, as oppressors and racists.
You may agree with CRT, but to call it fact based is certainly a laugh. Subjective analysis would be a stretch...fact based????
And once you recognize this you see the true purpose. In a communist revolution, if you were part of the upper class, there was nothing you could do to save yourself. Unless you were the child of a Bourgeois and turned on your parents, professors, or bosses. Then you were saved. But otherwise you were a sinner *by your very nature* and could not be saved.
CRT is intentionally the transmogrification of Wealth Class into Race Class, tailor made to undermine American exceptionalism where traditional marxism could not prevail.
"CRT is a high-level legal theory"
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Holy fuck.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
It is as rooted in "facts" as the 1619 project.
No surprise it comes from the same kind of people, with the same intent
Oh good Lord. I don't "celebrate" CRT.
And no, CRT is not "based on facts". It has its own share of paranoid lunacy. For instance one part of CRT claims that the 1956 Brown vs. Board of Education decision was not *really* about ending segregation based on civil rights principles, it was really just a PR stunt to make us look better in the eyes of the Soviet Union. I think that is completely whacko.
But it is also true that CRT is not the same as replacement theory.
Yes you do. You've defended it dozens of times and deny real world examples of its praxis in school.
"The fact is that CRT is a high-level legal theory that is based on facts"
LMAO. Well someone has certainly had zirself a healthy serving of the kool aid.
Care to list out those "facts"?
It is 100% based on feelings and made up post-modern bullshit while being nothing more than a vessel for garden variety marxism.
Not a surprise, as it came from a bunch of lefty academic actual marxists.
"zirself"...that was funny
Got to be parody.
Moderation4ever
"The fact is that CRT is a high-level legal theory that is based on facts"
LOL Man, the Tribalism is strong in this one.
The fact that the bullshit originated with a few 'legal scholars' does not make it a high level legal theory, or give it any credibility. They wrote some bigoted, loopy nonsense devoid of facts, and folks like you eat it up. Your bias and ignorance are competing.
Many anti-racism activists have used some version of the line "We will replace you" (meaning white people) in recent years. It's an article of their faith that eventually white people will be an embattled minority group.
Perspectives on the baby formula shortage.
Just suckle at Bill Gates' fake teat and be done with it.
They're real, and they're spectacular.
Thank you both for that horrific image.
Statements like these are extremely crass. But what's not just crass but dangerous are the attempts to use this tragedy to expand federal power.
And when we look at the statements, what exactly do we see? Oh, yeah two statements by lefties insisting anyone who disagrees with them bear responsibility for this psychotic and one from an "extremist" Republican sending out prayers for the victims and their families and suggesting it might be a good idea to put money to mental health, rather than an optional war half a world away. Yeah, those three statements are just totally equivalent. This is absolutely clownish.
My thought exactly.
ENB is a leftist Democrat who deceitfully portrays herself as a libertarian.
Everything that is making people's lives worse is the left's/establishment's doing.
Everything.
All intentional, man made problems.
Yup. They think that they're so clever and smart that they try to rewrite and meddle with everything from economics to biology, but they're idiots so they invariably fuck it up.
Every time.
ENB cited her own tweets? What the fuck.
Lol.
I don't know what it's called, but I read a good term for it somewhere.
Basically, people can try to boost an online argument by posting links to supporting data. Those data might not be real, or the link might be BS (like using her own tweet as though it was a source).
The idea is that people won't actually check the source material, so it looks like the argument is well supported when it's really not.
"The idea is that people won't actually check the source material, so it looks like the argument is well supported when it's really not."
That's been Boehm, Sullum and Shrike's modus operandi since forever.
There's a term for this? I'd really like to know what it is. This style of argument drives me crazy.
New research suggests that "people who are vaccinated and then get infected with omicron may be primed to overcome a broad range of coronavirus variants..."
Holy fucking shit are they trying hard.
You can see the beads of sweat on the foreheads from here.
"people who are vaccinated and then get infected with cowpox may be primed to overcome a broad range of smallpox variants..."
This is basically what they are arguing here, that vaccination only becomes robust if you get the jab AND get the illness. For all their worship of Science!, these people really need a refresher on how inoculation actually works.
May be primed to overcome. The language of science the last 3 years has been incredible. Notice how nobody ever states facts that what they are doing is working, which have all been wrong. Kind of like common sense gun control and the rich paying their fair share. When you have no real numbers, you can never be wrong.
Also, people who get infected and recover are able to overcome a broad range of variants, because INFECTION IS WHAT ACTUALLY PROVIDES PROTECTION.
I presume, after three shots and having Omicron, that I will soon have super powers.
I do.
I can turn invisible.
Alas, I can't control it, and it only happens when I'm trying to flirt with a girl across the room, or get the attention of my waiter.
Deadman was a DC superhero for years and years.
Funny how some useless /pol/tard shoots up a grocery store and the left immediately springs in to action to combat domestic terrorism, but not black supremacists opening fire in Sacramento and a Brooklyn subway, as well as running down people at a Christmas parade, or even that guy who decided to open fire on a crowd in Milwaukee after the Bucks game.
It's almost like the left sees black people as bioweapons to be used against their enemies.
33 shot and 5 dead in Chicago last weekend.
Crickets
Black Lives only Matter when Democrats can use them as a political prop or a fundraising tool
Oh it’s been far from crickets. If the dirty Left proposed banning the sale of guns to gun nuts… you know, say, a public safety measure designed to prevent people who are talking to themselves about a race war at the gun store from buying a high capacity assault rifle… we conservatives and libertarians sure would be talking about the 2nd amendment. Which is as it should be!
If only Chicago would enact strict gun control laws!
Continue to say you're not a Democrat shrike.
You forgot to mention that you're a gay black conservative. You're slipping.
That's why shrike will never be on OBL's level, no matter how much cheese pizza he views on his computer.
How are you so uniquely bad at everything you do? Bring American Socialist back!
Gang violence is still the number one threat to the black community.
Their motives remain shrouded in mystery.
How did former governor of Texas Rick Perry become a major advocate for psychedelics?
He had three groovy trips but in fairness can only remember two of them.
He was also the Secretary of Energy. That job seems to make everyone nuts.
Hey look… gun nut finally goes off in Buffalo. You know who I— as a gay, Black conservative blame? The liberal media. Oh, and Twitter. I mean, with all the cancel culture and virtue signalling going on someone was just liable to pop off. Shame on you, Jack Dorsey. This is all your fault!
Just horrible. Stop.
Stop doing what? Praising Dear Leader like you guys? Never!
And shrike fucks up again.
I don’t know exactly how this ugly rumor started that I am somehow a sock of Mr. Buttplug. This is incorrect. Mr. Buttplug— and he will tell you this one thousand times— is a free market man who thinks that Bernie Sanders is just as bad as Ted Cruz. The way you’ll be able to distinguish that absolutely clear position from my position is that I’ll tell you— as a gay Black conservative who is GOP Proud like Average Joes Caitlin and Milo— that Bernie Sanders is A thousand times worse than Ted Cruz. Please make a note of it, ok? And just stop.
Fuck off, Shrike.
Wow. You are terrible at even trying to hide this is your sock shrike.
Go pay your mortgage and stop diddling kids, you shit weasel.
Terrible at this shrike.
It would help if you at least understood the positions you are trying to parody.
There's a reason the Left can't meme...
Precisely. They are arguing with themselves.
It's the same reason 'their' arguments are so shitty, they think they know everything, can read minds, and are infallible, when the opposite is true.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement "has spent $2.8 billion since 2008 developing surveillance and facial-recognition capabilities, mostly in secrecy and without real oversight..."
Their racist AI had a tough time telling the brown people apart.
How many people even know the Obama admin capped the Summer Work Travel Program?
Holy hell, has enough time passed already that we're reporting on Obama now?
Threadwinner.
There will be 5-6 million kids die this summer without all the foreign lifeguards.
More kids will die on beaches with lifeguards than will die of COVID. But let's spend a few more billion dollars on shots and protect them from seeing facial expressions.
It won't do any good to spend the money if we don't force them to take the shots. Notice how CA is doing it the hardest. If a kid isn't vaccinated with an experimental "vaccine" that is apparently worse than worthless do to the side effects, no school, no sports, and no fun.
due to the side effects.
That’s because you Mormons are too dumb to learn to swim.
Do you even understand that every insult you come up with is recycled from a well known racial trope? It's like you take the absolute worst of whatever shithole town you learned to hate in, slap some white paint on it, and pretend it isn't the same vile rhetoric.
That thought didn’t cross my mind. Maybe it’s because I don’t belong to a church that didn’t allow blacks till 78 or teaches that Native Americans aren’t white because of sin?
Shows how racist you are if that’s where your mind goes when you hear that.
I learned about the second anointing over the weekend. What does that say about your church that lowly members like you can’t get it. It’s like a fast pass to get to the celestial kingdom no matter what(like you can kill people and shit). You gotta be like Quorum of 12 or Gordon Smith or Romney to get it.
Sucks for you.
Your linking of the inability to swim to a lack of intelligence is a not even thinly redressed version of the ideas promoted by the people you profess to be railing against. And this one is very well known.
WHY CAN'T BLACK PEOPLE SWIM? CONFRONTING SYSTEMATIC RACISM IN SWIMMING
You just can't help supporting actual racism in your gross ignorance.
I’m familiar with that. I believe segregated swimming pools is a big reason. Again it didn’t cross my mind because I’m not racist.
Mormons had ample access to swimming pools and were the ones doing the segregating before 78.
You’re a racist piece of shit
The American public doesn’t tolerate bigotry, arrogance, and people forcing religion on others. They will be on our side. Better head back to Utah and circle the wagons. We’re coming for you!
Heads on pikes, Mormon corpses dangling from bridges by their garments! You started the war motherfucker!
A Puerto Rican once informed me that mexicos Olympic team sucks because everyone that can run, jump or swim is already in the US
Virginia’s GOP Leaders Say They Can’t Enforce The Law Against Leftists Harassing SCOTUS Justices
https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/13/virginias-gop-leaders-are-refusing-to-enforce-the-law-against-leftists-harassing-scotus-justices/
In response to the intimidation tactics, Youngkin, along with Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, sent a letter to U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland, in which the Republican governors called upon the Department of Justice to prosecute demonstrators for violating federal law.
“While we are willing to assist in the event the need for increased security measures becomes imminent, federal law enforcement entities must take the lead and provide sustained resources to protect the Justices and ensure these residential areas are secure in the weeks and months ahead,” the letter reads.
I kind of agree that enforcement of a federal law needs engagement from the feds to take action. It is Garland avoiding the legal issue here.
As detailed in § 18.2-419 of the Virginia Code, “Any person who shall engage in picketing before or about the residence or dwelling place of any individual, or who shall assemble with another person or persons in a manner which disrupts or threatens to disrupt any individual’s right to tranquility in his home, shall be guilty of a Class 3 misdemeanor,”
But ignoring your own state law is bad.
Nobody ever claimed that the GOP weren't spineless and retarded.
"Statements like these are extremely crass."
*"Our family is praying for the victims & families of the shootings this weekend and the severe mental health crisis in America," tweeted Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene—before quickly adding that America "should only be investing in our own people and our own problems."*
Where is the crassness?
The first two, yes, are pretty bad. MTG is, well, not. Should we be sending money globally? Provide a libertarian answer.
The screen told us to hate her so we must hate her no matter what she says.
Remember, she went to a white nationalist conference. That had black and Asian people as speakers. That’s as evil as it gets.
I eagerly await the "Libertarian Case for a Worldwide Unaccountable 'Health' Dictatorship: It will allow abortions until the fetus is old enough to vote" articles.
Explainer: How the World Health Organization might face future pandemics
https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/how-world-health-organization-might-face-future-pandemics-2022-02-24/
GENEVA, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Negotiations on new rules for dealing with pandemics will begin at the World Health Organization on Thursday, with a target date of May 2024 for a treaty to be adopted by the U.N. health agency's 194 member countries.
A new pact is among more than 200 recommendations for shoring up the world's defences against new pathogens made by various reviewers following the COVID-19 pandemic that has killed more than 6.2 million people in two years.
The WHO itself is facing calls for reform after an independent panel described it as "underpowered" when COVID-19 struck, with limited powers to investigate outbreaks and coordinate containment measures.
Unless items 1 through 199 are force the chinks to stop making bioweapons, this pact is a joke
I never had the WEF and the WHO on my despotic global governance BINGO card, back in 2010.
Yes, what we need is more powerful coordinated containment measures.
See Shanghai for a glimpse into the future.
Not limited enough.
It's very depressing that it looks like very few people are going to learn the right lessons from the pandemic. Instead just do all of the shit that failed, and that no one had ever tried before, but harder. There was never any chance of containing this thing. There never will be with a respiratory virus. Anyone promoting such activities should be mocked and kept as far from political power as possible.
Once again the 'journalists' claim that corona killed 6.2 million.
It's not a 'mistake.'
https://twitter.com/17cShyteposter/status/1526053708835848192?t=jkUzvp28YVFIIJopTYoo0Q&s=19
When "It's not happening and it's good that it is" doesn't work because you've spent years bragging that it's happening
Then you have to pivot to "But it's morally neutral and if you oppose this fully natural and inevitable event that could be stopped tomorrow you're a Nazi"
[Link]
This isn't exactly a hint at some grotesque act of mass political violence, either.
All you would have to do is end mass immigration.
Mass migration is a political policy. By definition, it's not politically or morally neutral.
The attempt to frame a political choice, that could be undone tomorrow, as inevitable, natural, and neutral means that you agree with the political choice and its consequences
And don't want your political opponents to have any say in what you're doing
Someone who wants to shut you out of the political process is, very obviously, your enemy. What they're saying is they want you powerless
The political issues they most want to be seen as "natural," then, completely *outside* of politics (and your power), must therefore be the most important issues in the world.
So important that you're evil if you start to wonder why they're good, and why they can't be stopped.
MOAR WAR!!!!
https://twitter.com/HarunMaruf/status/1526206039951040512
BREAKING: US President
@POTUS
has signed an order authorising hundreds of US special forces to be sent back to Somalia according to the New York Times. Around 700 US troops were moved out of Somalia during the last few days of Donald Trump’s term in January 2021.
Looks like eternal war's are back on the menu, boys!
Finally a return to normalcy.
Without sending our best trained to a shithole that we have no interest in, we weren't looking out for their best interest.
Congratulations Reason!
Immigration Is Changing the Political Landscape in Key States
https://www.americanprogress.org/article/immigration-is-changing-the-political-landscape-in-key-states/
Supporting real immigration reform that contains a pathway to citizenship for our nation's 11 million undocumented immigrants is the only way to maintain electoral strength in the future.
"11 million"
LOL
I think that they're referring to 11 million during Biden's term. Otherwise, that number is utter bullshit.
They've been using that number for 20 years, and it doesn't even account for the children who are (unconstitutionally) granted birthright citizenship
Senate Hearing Highlights How Single-Payer Will Ration Health Care
https://thefederalist.com/2022/05/16/senate-hearing-highlights-how-single-payer-will-ration-health-care/
The increase in demand for personal health care would exceed the increase in supply, resulting in greater unmet demand than the amount under current law….The increase in unmet demand would correspond to increased congestion in the health care system, including delays and foregone care.
we already live under single-controller healthcare. All insurance and medical business is comprehensively controlled and regulated by government. There is basically no decision left to the private actors to make.
And that's why the industry is such a mess of course.
They won't limit cutting off kids dicks at least.
Nor should they. 4 Ribbon Admiral Rachel Levine reminded us a couple weeks ago that gender affirming care is universally approved and universally awesome.
I keep telling the single-payer proponents this, but they refuse to listen.
If you're gonna need a bunch more doctors to keep up with demand, maybe we should eliminate the artificial cap on new doctors?
And since we're gonna need those doctors right away when single-payer is passed, doesn't it make sense to remove the cap NOW?
*crickets*
So think it through.
The poor overworked, damn near unpaid, doctors will have access to the voter registration lists, and can easily determine who is eligible for treatment (D), and who can wait until they die (R).
"The increase in demand for personal health care would exceed the increase in supply, resulting in greater unmet demand than the amount under current law…."
We have a family friend MD from Canada whose mother still lives there (she's a US resident). Seems her mother had some health issues, and there was no waiting in line for *her*!
It'll be rationed alright, but by your guanxi, not your ability to pay.
Guanxi...very nice
In 2002, my host-father from my year in Denmark came to visit me, and also get his knees replaced.
The waiting list for non-life-saving (just quality of life) surgery was so long, under what was then considered the best socialized health care system on the planet, that it was a better option for him to have it done here, and pay out of his own pocket, rather than get it for 'free' in his own country.
New research suggests that "people who are vaccinated and then get infected with omicron may be primed to overcome a broad range of coronavirus variants,"
Sort of like the night that Wilt Chamberlain and Al Attles combined to score 117 points.
More like the night that Wilt and Ted Luckenbill combined to score 100 points.
• Bad immigration policy is driving a lifeguard shortage:
Huh?
Americans can't swim or something.
I know they have to toe the company line, but I would like to know just how many foreigners come to the US to lifeguard every summer.
They neediness guards with blonde leg hair for the minorities to play with like Pres Joe.
In case you forgot what child sex change advocates Dave Weigel looks like:
https://twitter.com/Oilfield_Rando/status/1523700466982395904
He looks like a chubby Justin Trudeau
The 2nd reply is worth the click.
https://twitter.com/JordanSchachtel/status/1526211870583140355?t=w36DSPW1l0KzXCPg19Lh0w&s=19
Biden is sending troops into Somalia to "fight al shabaab," after Trump withdrew from it at the end of his presidency.
Of course, there is no declaration of war.
Biden signed an EO & now we're back to war in Somalia, w/ boots on the ground & bombing runs all over the country.
Adults in charge, return to norms.
War Powers Act, written to sidestep the Constitutional requirement to declare war, is now itself being sidestepped.
I just dislike the idea that the media is running with, which is "This guy was horribly racist so he's therefore on the political right." As if racism can only exist on the political right and isn't an individual sentiment, and it ignores all the racism on the left.
I also dislike people playing political football with mass shooters, in general. "He's one of you!" "No, he's one of you!" It's really a massive case of missing the point that 8 people fucking died because a whack-job wanted to shoot up a supermarket.
Most Racist nazis hate both political parties since they accuse, rightfully so, of both parties being duplicitous.
The right is incredibly racist.
A couple of moths ago a far right establishment posted that blacks don't care about family, showing up on time, academics, objective reality, or work. Whe will the gov shut down those extremists at the gettesburg African American museum?
Yep. The biggest story here is how the memory hole swallows up some shooters but not others. I wonder what the difference is.........
^
Exactly this. The media has fully latched onto this one with all the associated buzzwords and wall to wall coverage.
But other recent horrific acts were memory holed sometimes the same day.
With the only difference being skin color.
They are the true anti-racist heroes, to be sure
https://twitter.com/ggreenwald/status/1526213221035786241
The most-discussed document by far over the last 48 hours by the media is the Buffalo killer's manifesto.
Yet once again, Big Tech has barred anyone from posting that document or even linking to it, meaning you have to rely on what media tells you -- you can't read it yourself.
Words are dangerous.
Is there something in there that contradicts the prevailing narrative that Tucker Carlson inspired this guy?
Self admitted leftist. Prior communist. Hates fox News. No mention of Tucker at all.
Well, yeah. But other than that?
Because the media has SUCH a great track record of reporting the truth.
Totally not the enemy of the people though.
Op-Ed: The Buffalo gunman emerged from a far-right ecosystem that’s gone mainstream
In the coming days after the horrific terrorist attack in Buffalo, N.Y., we’re likely to hear that the killer was a so-called “lone wolf.” While the suspect, Payton Gendron, an 18-year-old white male, may have acted alone, he emerged from a far-right ecosystem that is more entrenched and pervasive than most Americans would like to admit.
A hate-filled manifesto that Gendron apparently posted online stated that he radicalized in the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic, when he began spending time on websites like 4chan and other venues soaked in far-right extremism and violent white supremacy.
The attack specifically targeted a predominantly African American neighborhood in Buffalo where the perpetrator knew he could maximize casualties. His attack killed 10 people and wounded three; 11 of the 13 shot were Black residents. The attack bears many similarities to other far-right attacks of recent years, including the 2019 massacres in El Paso and Christchurch, New Zealand. This copycat phenomenon is purposeful.
Online manifestos are to far-right extremists what martyrdom tapes are to Salafi jihadis — ways of memorializing their violent acts and ready-made propaganda for those who seek to follow in their footsteps.
https://www.latimes.com/opinion/story/2022-05-15/buffalo-shooting-gunman-white-supremacist-great-replacement
Was he a J6 tourist?
"Online manifestos are to far-right extremists what martyrdom tapes are to Salafi jihadis"
So far-right that he turned out to be left.
The shooter reminds me of Shrike actually:
Cernovich @Cernovich
The manifesto of the terrorist who killed people today contains the following:
- He did a chart of Jewish people and included me under “troll Jew.”
- Rejection of Christianity.
- An admission that he is is “authoritarian left wing.”
- Hybrid Nazi and “green nationalism.”
https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/1525607587856543744
Comfortably Smug @ComfortablySmug
The killer's manifesto explicitly attacks Fox News
[image]
https://twitter.com/ComfortablySmug/status/1525601565188530176
Buffalo shooting suspect duped by 'replacement theory' that's now part of the GOP playbook
Opinion: The racist, xenophobic 'great replacement' conspiracy isn't only being spewed by the lunatic fringe. It's being spewed by the lunatic mainstream.
Because “replacement theory” isn’t only being spewed by the lunatic fringe.
It is being spewed by the lunatic mainstream.
It is being spewed, for example, by Fox television host Tucker Carlson.
And it is being spewed by Republican candidates for public office all over the country.
https://www.azcentral.com/story/opinion/op-ed/ej-montini/2022/05/16/buffalo-shooting-suspect-bought-replacement-theory-arizona-politicians/9784620002/
I reject GOP ideology, you idiot.
No, you just spew Dem ideology, and citing that commie shithead EJ Montini is proof.
Your source is a left lunitic at a keyboard
Replacement theory is mirrored on the left with CRT and racial grievances dumbass. The entire theology of CRT is about whites embedding structural barriers to protect themselves as they lose majority status. And yes you defend this shit.
You've now spent 4 days pushing leftist narratives while ignoring this idiot was a self proclaimed leftist.
There is far more race grievances coming from the left these days dumbass.
Mirrored? Doesn't Kirkland and his ilk explicitly endorse that concept?
Yes. And I suspect that the smug gloating has had an effect on the rak-types on the right.
By the way, AZ central leans heavily left.ike you, they are protecting their party from the shooter being on the left.
If you lean right then he's a leftist. If you lean right then he's a conservative. Everything is political.
If you look at the facts he is a leftist. Weird how you ignored that part.
This is a dumb thing to argue about. Left/right is way too low resolution to be useful in discussing any particular person's politics, particularly when well out of the mainstream.
This guy seems to have been a crazy person with some pretty clearly left-wing views as well as some that are typically associated with certain parts of the far right.
So what if this asshole was left or right? In neither case do his actions here say anything about what leftists or rightists in general believe. It was his actions and his choice, not that of the whole American left or right.
It's dumb unless you view the world through a political lens. If you're someone who judges the politics of the drivers on the way to the store by the cars they drive, judge the politics of shoppers by what you see in their baskets, and again by how they pay, then of course it matters. It matters a lot.
I'm glad I'm not one of those people. It must be exhausting.
What do you think you've done this entire thread lol?
This is a dumb thing to argue about.
----
Not when every MSM story is calling him right-wing.
So what? Is it supposed to be our job now to supposedly defend the honor of the right-wing?
If you're not defending the right then you're defending the left. If you fail to sufficiently criticize the left then you are defending the left. If you criticize the right then you are defending the left. If you don't praise the right then you are defending the left. You should know this by now.
Defending the right from accusations that the whole political right-wing is motivated largely by racism seems pretty reasonable and worthwhile. Same when people make over the top generalizations about the whole left or libertarians, or whatever. Defend accuracy and truth.
You are right Zeb.
You spent all day yesterday arguing he was on the right despite his own statements.
Youre supposed to point to facts instead of defending the left which you claim not to be.
Correcting the gross inaccuracies I'm good with. But extended arguments about it here is pointless except as a way to smear people on the side you don't like. Left/right just doesn't cover everything.
The dumb part is people denying what he said in his manifesto and blindly pushing him to the other side.
I honestly don't care which side he is on. I take unbranded with the left pushing lies to back their narrative. If in his manifesto he said he was conservative I wouldn't be here arguing.
But jeff/shrike/sarc have been pushing the claim all white nationalists are on the right in order to push a narrative DESPITE the shooters own words.
That is utter dishonesty from those people.
I take umbrage*
Like I said, I'm all for correcting lies and bullshit. I'm sure I will find myself in some arguments making the point that no, he is not a representative of or product of the American right.
No, it is not dumb to argue about.
We're in a fucking war, zeb. Stop being a pretentious pussy.
He's a leftist.
Sure, that's what he calls himself, good enough. People who are trying to claim that the right is responsible for him are full of shit and should be take to task for that nonsense. But the main thing is that he is a murdering asshole.
This is a dumb thing to argue about.
This horrible act was committed by a child of the the Marxist-Indoctrination Complex. They don't get to absolve themselves of the inevitable results of the murderous ideology they have inflicted on American education.
""that's now part of the GOP playbook""
Where is this GOP playbook?
Wasn't his main complaint in 2020 that trump didn't have a playbook?
That's part of the dishonesty, a shell game, that the media is playing. He was racist and wrote a manifesto, therefore, no matter what he wanted, he is right-wing. All racists are right wingers because they've decided racism is what the right-wing advocates for.
It's a form of sophistry by including a false premise.
White Supremacy is pure "right wing".
You don't understand that?
The only people that believe your made up definitions is you. Now go kill yourself you pedo
Biden just spoke fondly in remembrance of his lunches woth segragationists....
You really aren't intelligent shrike. Your only desire is to protect the left.
Richard Spencer endorsed biden for fucks sake.
https://newstalk955.com/remember-this-whitefish-racist-richard-spencer-endorses-biden/
To be fair Whitefish doesn't really contain any Montanan's anymore just vacation houses for Silicon Valley.
Dude you're a fucking liar and an idiot. White Supremacy is associated with white guys with shaved heads and tattoos who claim to be Christians and vote unwaveringly for Republicans.
The fact that they vote for Republicans doesn't mean that Republicans support them.
They're the "guvmint iz cumming fer ur gunz" idjits. And they didn't vote for Biden.
As Jesse pointed out, Richard Spencer endorsed Biden and David Duke endorsed Hillary.
Do you really think that skinhead militia guys are voting for people who support welfare for blacks and who want to take away our guns?
Use your brain.
And yet... Those are the only two real people we know of... And they did.
You trust self-appointed mouthpieces? I don't.
So when they told their supporters to vote for the candidates... they were lying?
That's pretty far-fetched, sarc.
It's 26-D chess! David Duke knows everyone hates him, so if he says vote Hillary, they'll all vote Trump, which is what he really wants!
Do you really think that skinhead militia guys are voting for people who support welfare for blacks
Absolutely. Like the Democrats they have also believe that blacks are intellectually challenged people who lack their own agency and who shouldn't have guns.
Maybe. But not in my experience. I go shooting a lot and I'm chatty. I've met exactly zero Democrats at the range. I've met quite a few Hannity fans though. Gun people aren't Democrats. And militia guys are gun guys. You do the logic.
Demolition Ranch did a trip to Canada. It was interesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9QpnBmhlv9I
You should spend more time at the range. Gun people are a really nice bunch.
Remember that time sarc said he doesn’t trust himself with a gun in his hand?
Where'd you get any of that from my comment? I was saying that white supremacists don't want blacks owning guns anymore than the rest of the Democrats.
I also don't associate most militia-types with white supremacists. Being anti-globalist or anti-statist doesn't mean racism.
Many of those militia are socialists.
Why do you rush to defend the left based on your own ignorance?
Many of them were bernie supporters too.
But please, continue to defend the left at all costs.
BOAFF SIDEZ!!!!
This is pretty funny. You're the first to jump on someone who points out when your team does the same thing as the other team and shout BOTH SIDES BOTH SIDES as a counterargument. And now you're doing it yourself.
Too funny. You're so self unaware.
Except I've cited actual examples while you've blindly pushed narratives without any citations.
Ignore the actual white supremacists whose names we know and actually exist, and focus on sarc’s imagination.
The old school racists are Democrats. Yes. But the swastika types are not.
Except the evidence you've been given but continue to deny in your need to defend the left.
I'm not defending anything you fucking idiot. Just because you rabidly defend the right doesn't mean anyone who disagrees with you is defending the other team. Stop the binary thinking. Get a brain.
I'm going with what I've seen and with people I've known, not with the voices in the echo chamber of your mind.
You now have over a dozen posts defending actual evidence that racism does exist on the left including white nationalists.
What the fuck do you actually think you're doing except defending the left?
So when you say both sides it means both sides, but when I do I'm defending the left. Gotcha.
Youre defending from a base of narrative pushing. I'm citing actual evidence sarc. Your need is one from protecting the left. Mine is just stopping the idiotic bullshit formed from your hatred.
But the swastika types are not."
I've never seen any evidence that they're not. They have the same economics philosophy and tendency to infantilize minority races, and they both hate the GOP for their support of Israel.
I go with what I see, not what people with an agenda tell me.
Where do you see that? Because I'm guessing CNN.
David Duke endorsed Hillary
Well, this is a very strange endorsement indeed. Here is David Duke claiming that Hillary should be executed.
https://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/senate-races/304102-david-duke-hillary-clinton-should-be-getting-the-electric-chair/
Shhhh! Don't fuck up the narrative with facts!
Poor sarc. Thinks team blue has the finally scored a hit only to have it beaten down immediately after.
https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-03-14/ku-klux-klan-grand-dragon-will-quigg-endorses-hillary-clinton-for-president
"We want Hillary Clinton to win," he said. "She is telling everybody one thing, but she has a hidden agenda. She’s telling everybody what they want to hear so she can get elected, because she’s Bill Clinton’s wife, she’s close to the Bushes. Once she’s in the presidency, she’s going to come out and her true colors are going to show. Border policies are going to be put in place. Our second amendment rights that she’s saying she’s against now, she’s not against. She’s just our choice for the presidency."
When asked about the "hidden agenda," Quigg said, "I cannot reveal my sources.” When the Telegraph asked Quigg why he reneged on his promise to support Trump in the race, he replied: "We don’t like his hair. We think it’s a toupee. He won’t do what he says he will do. He says he’s going to build a 20-foot high fence along with border with Mexico and make them pay. How’s he going to do that?"
Now that's a totally sincere "endorsement" if I've ever seen one.
Lol. And Jeff comes over to defend someone else in defense of the left.
Imagine if a neo-Nazi endorsed Trump and then one of us claimed it totally didn't count because the Nazi didn't sound totally sincere in our opinion.
Jeff would lose his shit.
But look at him go here.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/03/14/kkk-grand-dragon-endorses-clinton/81794314/
And in 2020?
https://www.newsweek.com/tulsi-gabbard-david-duke-endorse-bds-israel-ilhan-omar-west-bank-boycott-1318365
Yup, Duke endorsed Tulsi Gabbard because of his hatred of Israel. You got it. I think it is noteworthy that neither Spencer nor Duke endorsed Trump in 2020. Because they both saw that he was not only not a white nationalist like they were, but also just merely a fraud.
It's really disingenuous though to claim that David Duke in particular isn't firmly on the right. He has been in Republican politics since the 1980s, and he was even at the Unite the Right rally in Charlottesville.
He has been in Republican politics since the 1980s
Yeah, like that time in 1988 when he ran for president as a Re... whoops... what's this?... A Democrat?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke_1988_presidential_campaign
"In 1988, David Duke unsuccessfully ran for the presidency of the United States. Duke, a perennial Democratic candidate and Grand Wizard in the Ku Klux Klan announced his intention to seek Democratic nomination for 1988 presidential election on June 8, 1987."
Gee Jeff, always proving that the nickname "Lying Jeffy" isn't just for show.
And by the way, Duke oy switched when he tried to run for the senate using Trumps message. Guess how many votes he got from the GOP?
Weird how you ignore that part.
Well that was a curbstomping.
Poor Jeff, someone help him pick up his teeth.
You moron, Duke ran *and won* as a Republican in the Louisiana State House in the 1980s, and ran for the Louisiana Senate and Governor in the 1990's as a Republican, long before Trump was a thing.
He ran for a senate seat in 2016 you retarded fuck
Yes he did. Also in 1990. Learn some history.
Learn what I was obviously referring to instead of trying to cover for your team.
Here's David Duke's campaign history:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Duke#Early_campaigns
While he was in the Klan he ran as a Democrat from 1975 up until the end of the 80's. At the end of the decade he renounced the Klan and racism, claimed he found religion and ran as a Republican.
When that didn't work either, he went back to his vomit and started endorsing Democrats again.
Richard Spencer endorsed Biden
It is notable that Spencer endorsed Biden not because of ideology, but because he believed Republicans were "ineffective, useless, and traitorous", and that he believed "Liberals are clearly more competent."
https://www.newsweek.com/richard-spencer-reiterates-support-biden-disavows-useless-traitorous-gop-1527555
So it wasn't because he loved Biden or Democrats. It was because he was fed up with Trump. Like a lot of people were.
And why did Spencer turn on Trump? Because even he saw Trump as a fraud.
White nationalist Richard Spencer appeared on CNN’s “The Lead With Jake Tapper” Tuesday night, calling President Trump’s tweets directed at four congresswoman “racist.” Spencer added that Trump is running a “con game” and not truly advancing white nationalism.
[...]
“Many white nationalists will eat up this red meat that Donald Trump is throwing out there,” Spencer said in the brief, on-camera CNN interview. “I am not one of them. I recognize the con game that is going on.”
https://www.thewrap.com/richard-spencer-cnn-donald-trump-racist-tweets/
Youre quote is leftists making more bald assertions?
Lol.
Yes. You and sarc aren't defending the left at every turn this morning.
It's Spencer's own words, dumbass
Citing embarrassed Democrats making excuses, like Deirdre McCloskey, isn't really the counterpoint you think it is.
It's Spencer's own fucking words.
I was referring to Deirdre McCloskey's statement in your article, which I'm beginning to realize you didn't probably read past the first few paragraphs.
Anyway, "Trump is running a “con game” and not truly advancing white nationalism"? I think anyone could have told you that... like Donald Trump himself for example.
If Spencer is disappointed that Trump isn't actually racist, then he should stop watching so much CNN propaganda and falling for it.
That said, I don't understand how you think that reflects poorly on Trump, Jeff.
I like how you admit to your own ignorance. Racism, including white nationalism, is on both sides of the spectrum.
You just feel compelled to defend the left.
OMG! Did you just BOFF SIDEZ????!?!?
Yes. They both have racists.
Your claim as well is shrikes is that all white nationalists are on the right. Showing examples of one on the left defeats that narrative you are blindly pushing.
Do you know how debates work?
"Do you know how debates work?"
Yeah. Someone compares your team to the assholes and you shut the debate down by shouting "BOAF SIDEZ!"
This is hilarious. Whenever anyone says both sides you rail on them for defending the left. But when you do it it's suddenly a persuasive argument. If cognitive dissonance was explosive your head could level a small block.
I mean the entirety of your argument, along with Jeff and shrike, is this shooter who says he is on the left can't be because he is a white nationalist. That is the entirety of your argument.
Showing this argument is false at its base, that white nationalists also vote dem shows your thesis to be based on bullshit.
You understand that right?
But again, you feel forced to defend and deflect from this guy being on the left despite the guys own words of what he is.
I mean this is your post sarc.
sarcasmic
May.16.2022 at 11:53 am
Flag Comment Mute User
So fucking what? He's pointing out that people who call themselves white supremacists didn't vote for Biden. And he's right.
It is entirely false.
Yes. History is full of the left being ferocious racists.
I've cited other examples earlier, but Che Guevara is another example of an anti-black bigot firmly ensconced on the left.
And Marx didn't even think that they were human.
Today's whole game of pretending racism is solely on the right is as dishonest as it is stupid. Stupid because history and even today are full of examples of racist lefties.
That's not my argument anyway.
My argument is that he has much more in common with the right than the left, since his racism is not the condescending belittling kind which is typical of left-wing racism, but is the hatred oppressive racism that is more typical of right-wing racism. AS WELL AS his advocacy for replacement theory nonsense, which despite your protestations, is NOT the same as CRT. Replacement theory crap is quite common on the alt-right side of the spectrum. I have yet to hear of anyone on the left wing say anything resembling the idea that there is some deliberate plot to replace white people with non-white people, AND who if they did think that it was happening that it wasn't a GOOD thing.
Also, "right-wing" does not necessarily mean "vote for Republicans". I can totally see some of these guys not voting for Republicans over Israel, or because they think Republicans are "worthless and useless" like Richard Spencer thinks. It doesn't mean though that they don't hold right-wing views on most issues, such as immigration or welfare or gun control.
I haven't read the manifesto, so I'd actually really like to know why he thinks he is on the left. Maybe he thinks he's on the left because he's totally freaked out about climate change like a lot of young people are. I don't know.
Today's whole game of pretending racism is solely on the right is as dishonest as it is stupid. Stupid because history and even today are full of examples of racist lefties.
Racism is not solely on the right. But the racism on the left and the racism on the right are two different types of racism. The racism on the left tends to be the condescending belittling type. The racism on the left tends to be the oppressive hateful type. What we saw on Saturday was the oppressive hateful type of racism.
jeff, you don't get it.
It's ok when they say both sides because, well, because.
But when you say both sides you're defending the left.
See?
Jeff and sarc of devoid of any honest debate as they defend the left.
Again your entire argument relies on an unsubstantiated narrative designed to protect the left.
This isn't both sides. This is showing your dishonesty dumbass.
You are denying the shooters own words with your false narratives.
No where was I making a comparative assessment of either side you retarded fuck.
"The racism on the left tends to be the condescending belittling type. The racism on the left tends to be the oppressive hateful type. What we saw on Saturday was the oppressive hateful type of racism."
I can't disagree with that. You're 100% correct there.
White guys that wear bathrobes and pointy hats called...
Probably because the left has dabbled in it since scientific racism became a thing.
For example when the Bronx Zoo kept a pygmy man in the monkey house, the very liberal New York Times attacked detractors for being religious kooks who didn't understand science.
Or when the socialist Fabian Society pushed colonial governments to stick native children into residential schools to civilize them.
Or the antisemitic "Doctors Plot" purge in the Soviet Union.
Or CRT and affirmative action in the US.
So fucking what? He's pointing out that people who call themselves white supremacists didn't vote for Biden. And he's right.
That's not even remotely true, sarcasmic. They hated Trump because they thought he was a Jewish tool. Just because the Democrat's own CNN didn't report the Klan and Spencer's endorsements doesn't mean that they didn't happen.
Bulshit. Racists love Trump. They are his base.
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a kiddie diddler, a TDS addled piece of shit and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
That's why we posted all those examples of American neo-nazis endorsing the Democrats, Shrike.
To demonstrate that you're a liar.
Sorry to burst your bubble but unlike you I don't have cable news droning in the background all day.
Then how can you be so confident that shrike, a known shitposter and liar, is right?
He's talking about the general narrative. What people hear when they're a step or two out of the fray. People in the fray are busy cherry picking and flinging shit like monkeys. Those who don't care that much only hear the loudest shouting. And the loudest shouting says that skinheads are right wing.
Lol. Sarc admits he talks about a narrative instead of evidence based claims.
Youre pushing leftist talking points blindly.
There is more racism on the left these days.
Look at the attacks on conservative minorities as an example.
Shrike isn't talking about the general narrative though. He's explicitly stating that white supremacists are all Republicans. Which, based off their own statements, is simply not true.
" He's explicitly stating that white supremacists are all Republicans."
I'm not agreeing with that. I'm disagreeing with those who are saying that they're all Democrats.
Though in my experience every white supremacist I've met was a right winger.
sarcasmic
May.16.2022 at 1:03 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
He's talking about the general narrative.
Thanks for playing. Next time maybe don’t tell on yourself.
sarcasmic
May.16.2022 at 1:21 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
" He's explicitly stating that white supremacists are all Republicans."
I'm not agreeing with that. I'm disagreeing with those who are saying that they're all Democrats.
JesseAz
May.16.2022 at 12:30 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
I like how you admit to your own ignorance. Racism, including white nationalism, is on both sides of the spectrum.
Liar.
You did agree with it sarc you fuckin liar.
sarcasmic
May.16.2022 at 11:53 am
Flag Comment Mute User
So fucking what? He's pointing out that people who call themselves white supremacists didn't vote for Biden. And he's right.
Did you not say "and he's right."
Fucking liar can't even last 5 posts without lying.
Let's be charitable.
Maybe you sarc has one of those short-term memory amnesia problems where you can't remember what you posted earlier.
Once again you think you've got a gotcha but you don't. You're just throwing random quotes out there and the only people who care are your fellow retards.
You are really really dumb sarc. If you can't see how you straight upped there you have more of a chronic impulse to lie than I thought.
In fact you have zero evidence except for your bald assertions above.
Go away. Civil adults are talking.
No. Youre defending lies.
I mean in the space of 5 posts you lied about your own argument.
If you're talking about Jeff and Shrike you're sadly mistaken, sarc. Those two fifty-centing trolls are the acme of callow.
I was attempting to have a conversation with DesigNate, but as usual the trolls see a conversation and shit on it to the point where continuity is lost.
You were lying to protect the left and got caught in a lie.
I'm sure you have all sorts of evidence for this bald assertions sarc.
Try google. Evidence abounds.
Do you have none. I provided evidence. You provided leftist narratives.
Not even on google, sarc.
You can't figure out how to use google? Dude....
Admit youn have no evidence of all nationalists are on the right which is a requirement of your arguments above.
Turn yourself in for your crimes against children.
Oh boy, the far left scum in the media (including the fugazi libertarians of Reason) are going to be talking about this Buffalo psychopath for weeks and weeks and weeks on end. As opposed to the. NYC subway psychopath, who they stopped talking about after a day and a half. Gee, I wonder why?
ROFLMAO, just kidding of course, we all know damn well the exact reasons why.
They never even talked about the DC shooter from two weeks ago who also posted online but didn't meet the narrative.
Pedophile-defending prof hired by Johns Hopkins center for prevention of child sexual abuse
https://thepostmillennial.com/pedophile-defending-prof-hired-by-johns-hopkins-center-for-prevention-of-child-sexual-abuse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Money
Money was a professor of pediatrics and medical psychology at Johns Hopkins University from 1951 until his death. Between 1960 and 1961, he co-authored two papers with Richard Green, "Incongruous Gender Role: Nongenital Manifestations in Prepubertal Boys" and "Effeminacy in Prepubertal Boys: Summary of Eleven Cases and Recommendations for Case Management." The paper's described attempts at conversion therapy on various children, hypothesizing successful attempts could be possible in childhood and acknowledging it to be ineffectual in adulthood. The concluded it was possible and best treated early, and that treatment recommendations included having the parents model traditional gender roles and support their child's "masculine behavior and sexuality" while making sure they don't unwittingly support feminine behavior.[14][15]
Money established the Johns Hopkins Gender Identity Clinic in 1965 along with Claude Migeon who was the head of pediatric endocrinology at Johns Hopkins. The hospital began performing sexual reassignment surgery in 1966.[16] At Johns Hopkins, Money was also involved with the Sexual Behaviors Unit, which ran studies on sex-reassignment surgery. In 2002, he received the Magnus Hirschfeld Medal from the German Society for Social-Scientific Sexuality Research.
...During his professional life, Money was respected as an expert on sexual behavior, especially known for his views that gender was learned rather than innate. However, it was later revealed that his most famous case of David Reimer, born Bruce Reimer, was fundamentally flawed.[25] In 1966, a botched circumcision left eight-month-old Reimer without a penis. Money persuaded the baby's parents that sex reassignment surgery would be in Reimer's best interest. At the age of 22 months, Reimer underwent an orchiectomy, in which his testicles were surgically removed. He was reassigned to be raised as female and his name changed from Bruce to Brenda. Money further recommended hormone treatment, to which the parents agreed. Money then recommended a surgical procedure to create an artificial vagina, which the parents refused. Money published a number of papers reporting the reassignment as successful.
During subsequent appointments with Reimer and Reimer's twin brother Brian, Money forced the two to rehearse sexual acts, with David playing the bottom role as his brother "[pressed] his crotch against" David's buttocks. Money also forced the two children to strip for "genital inspections", occasionally taking photos. Money justified these criminal acts by claiming that "childhood 'sexual rehearsal play'" was important for a "healthy adult gender identity".[4]
For several years, Money reported on Reimer's progress as the "John/Joan case", describing apparently successful female gender development and using this case to support the feasibility of sex reassignment and surgical reconstruction even in non-intersex cases. Notes by a former student at Money's laboratory state that, during the yearly follow-up visits, Reimer's parents routinely lied to staff about the success of the procedure. Reimer's twin brother, Brian, later developed schizophrenia.[26] At 14 years old and in extreme psychological agony, Reimer was finally told the truth by his parents. He chose to begin calling himself David, and he underwent surgical procedures to revert the female bodily modifications.[27]
David Reimer's case came to international attention in 1997 when he told his story to Milton Diamond, an academic sexologist, who persuaded Reimer to allow him to report the outcome in order to dissuade physicians from treating other infants similarly.[28] Soon after, Reimer went public with his story, and John Colapinto published a widely disseminated and influential account in Rolling Stone magazine in December 1997.[29] This was later expanded into The New York Times best-selling biography As Nature Made Him: The Boy Who Was Raised as a Girl (2000),[30] in which Colapinto described how—contrary to Money's reports—when living as Brenda, Reimer did not identify as a girl. He was ostracized and bullied by peers (who dubbed him "cavewoman"),[31][32] and neither frilly dresses[33] nor female hormones made him feel female.
On 1 July 2002, Brian was found dead from an overdose of antidepressants.
The left really seems to be all in with the normalization of pedophilia. Once again, the nut conspiracy theorists are turning out to be right. Today's conspiracy theory seems to always turn into tomorrow's accepted fact.
The left really seems to be all in with the normalization of pedophilia.
They've been trying this off and on for a while, but now that troonery has become one of their holy sacraments, they're using the same methodology to defend pedophiles.
That's why a kiddie-raper like Joseph Rosenbaum was celebrated as an ally.
I have long thought transgenderism was adopted at least in part as a way to normalize pedophilia. If a child can consent to changing his gender, there I don't see any reason why a child can't consent to sex with an adult. And the left is talking about kids down to two and three years old being "transgender".
It is the most depraved and evil thing I have ever seen. I can't believe society will stand for it. If it does, our society deserves to die. The Taliban is a better alternative than this.
Pedophilia is at the end of the road they are going down.
The recent trend is "never too early" to talk about sex. Of course it is, because how do you grow the movement of gender weirdness and queerness? Teach it as early as possible
But where this ends up at is materials designed for talking to extremely young kids about sex, sex acts, and gender queerness. With instructors intent on teaching these topics...thats way closer to pedo shit than I am OK with.
At this point, withdrawing your kids from public and even most private schools is practically a civic duty, because the profession is infested with this shit from top to bottom.
The better solution, of course, is to get on the school boards and be involved in the PTA meetings, because that's ultimately where it all starts, and work to drive out any dangerhair wierdos and feminist freaks from your community before their virus-like ideology infects it.
I saw that. Messed up.
Two weeks ago DC gunman Raymond Spencer also posted online during his shooting rampage.
Don't remember hearing about this from the media? Buttplug, Jeffy and White Mike forgot to bring it up? Democrats as quiet as mice?
Click on the link, look at at his picture and remember the narrative to find out why.
https://nypost.com/2022/04/23/suspected-dc-gunman-raymond-spencer-posted-online-during-siege/
>>to eradicate the white race
the what now?
shrooming with Rick Perry probably a hoot.
Shrooming with Rick Perry would be a good band name.
At some point the country needs to look at how much psychiatric drugs are contributing to these mass shootings. These shooters are in every case I can think of on some sort of serious psychiatric meds. I don't think it is necessarily the meds that are causing this. But I am starting to think that giving these meds to people who are not hospitalized is what is causing ordinary psychotics to become mass killers. These drugs have terrible side effects that are made much worse by the use of alcohol and drugs. If they are given to people outside of the hospital setting, there is no way to ensure that the patients are not mixed them with other drugs. To give these drugs on an outpatient basis seems to me to be extremely negligent.
These questions are never asked because big Pharma makes a lot of money from these drugs and gives the media a lot of advertising money. The media is happy to take the money and not bite the hand that feeds it and use these shootings as a way to slander the political right whenever possible and to push the bullshit gun control narrative.
Man the media has their talking points in order. "Racism / Hate" is all over every article.
Which is funny. Not only because "hate" is a silly motivation for a gunman...you could make the argument that every intentional shooting involves "hate". But the coordinated effort to label any potential racial motivation of a white person as a hate crime while NEVER labeling it the other way.
You know where I didn't see "hate crime", "hate", "racial motivation"? Any of the recent POC's involved in shootings. Waukesha.
So the game is you immediately memory hole black militants and never label it "hate" even when they have stated racial animosity?
So ya, ill continue to roll my eyes at "hate". You can GTFO trying to get me to care if something is a "hate crime" its clearly arbitrary and politically motivated
The guy in Waukesha did what he did for the single purpose of killing white people. This guy went there to kill people. The place could have been full of blacks, whites or whatever and he still would have been happy to shoot them.
Yet, the media assures us that Waukesha had nothing to do with race and this guy did it because of "racism". The media is honest and logical like that.
Uh.. dude....
Misinformation much?
Waukesha was a red SUV. People were impacted by the event.
Nothing to see there. I don't even get the comparison. An SUV isn't even a person. How can an SUV be racist?
+1 An SUV did some things.
It's even worse than the media, the alphabet agencies are doing this too. The FBI is doing its best to never label anything on the left political violence. It's a coordinated effort, our nation is screwed
@RachelBitecofer
I just need to change my vagina to an AR-15 so I'll have fundamental rights again.
Jesse Kelly
@JesseKellyDC
But then you'll have to clean it.
please tell me thats real
Oh, it's real, and it's pretty fucking hysterical.
Er, funny. It's pretty fucking funny.
But then you'll have to clean it.
Just keep mashing the forward assist. You'll be fine.
OK, that's funny.
Her twitter account kills fascism. How dare he insult her filthy ladybits.
The forward assist was just too perfect an image.
The formula shortage entirely the result of bureaucratic insanity. It is the kind of thing that even the Obama Administration would have never allowed to happen or been competent enough to not let happen for long. This could only happen under Biden because only the Biden Administration is this dysfunctional and incompetent. This is what happens when you have a dementia patient as President. No one is in charge. So, no one has the authority to tell the FDA to reopen the plant. Only the President can do that. And we don't have a President. We have a drooling, old crook who is likely unable to function more than a couple of hours a day at best.
This could only happen under Biden because only the Biden Administration is this dysfunctional and incompetent.
It's why I continue to call this the "Peter Principle Administration"--pretty much every person active there seems to have been promoted just beyond their level of competence to actually do their jobs, including the guy at the top.
Apparently Biden can turn around on a dime and start war ops in Somalia again, but somehow can't whip out his pen to tell the FDA to back off so the factory can start producing formula. This is his presidency in a nutshell.
That's because starting wars is the only thing we let presidents do anymore. You don't want them getting bored, do you?
Everyone assumed it would be ok because Biden would be surrounded by competent people who would really be in charge.
They forget the principle that the inner circle of an incompetent buffoon will be filled with incompetent buffoons. Competent ones leave to form their own power center, or at least quit and go work for someone else so their career isn’t dragged down by association with the incompetent.
The ones that stay, the loyal long-term aides, are the ones who are complete morons and would be exposed without their boss’ incompetence to shield them.
After Buffalo shooting, Liz Cheney tells Republicans to stop enabling white supremacy
"The House GOP leadership has enabled white nationalism, white supremacy, and anti-semitism," Cheney tweeted. "History has taught us that what begins with words ends in far worse. @GOP leaders must renounce and reject these views and those who hold them."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/2022/05/16/liz-cheney-republicans-stop-enabling-white-supremacy/9791700002/
So a guy shot a bundh of white people did so because he was a "white supremacist". Yeah that makes sense.
Haven't I been telling you for years you should stop insulting "Bushpigs" since the early 2000s neocons are on our side now? It's no coincidence Democrats' favorite Republican is Dick Cheney's daughter.
Indeed, she's part of a long list that includes David "Axis of Evil" Frum, Bill Kristol, and the late Colin Powell.
#LibertariansForEmbracingNeocons
Man, she's really angling hard for those Teton County donations, isn't she?
Buttplug loves the neocon warpigs now.
"Yay Iraq war! Yay Afghanistan war! Yay Liz Cheney!"
turd lies; it’s all he ever does. turd is a TDS addled pile of shit, a
kiddie diddler, and a pathological liar, entirely too stupid to remember which lies he posted even minutes ago, and also too stupid to understand we all know he’s a liar.
If anything he posts isn’t a lie, it’s totally accidental.
turd lies; it’s what he does. turd is a lying pile of lefty shit.
"Our family is praying for the victims & families of the shootings this weekend and the severe mental health crisis in America," tweeted Georgia Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene—before quickly adding that America "should only be investing in our own people and our own problems."
This is the most reasonable take of the tweets you posted as examples of "cheap political" points. She sends her prayers to the victims and notes that instead of maybe sending $44 billion to Ukraine, we might be focusing on our own problems-- problems the Democrats certainly think are unique to the American landscape.
It's interesting that left wingers have been citing the demographic trends of reducing whites as a percentage of Americans for decades, but when someone they hate cites it as justification this trend transforms into a "conspiracy theory". I'm curious how this mechanism of change works.
I am pretty sure this musing outs you as a racist.
Without a doubt.
It's interesting that left wingers have been citing the demographic trends of reducing whites as a percentage of Americans for decades
Hell, Time Magazine was almost a clearinghouse for this transracial stuff. I remember one issue had them celebrating the idea that globalism was going to result in color-blindness because everyone was going to end up as some variant of beige.
Time apparently didn't get the Critical Race Theory memo. Colorblindness IS racism.
The funny thing is, it would honestly be better if that were the case. If we could just agree we are all mutts and this shit doesnt matter we could move on to something meaningful.
But of course that will never happen because division and power is their goal.
Highly evidenced by the recent reactions toward whites adopting children with any kind of tan. Or worse, when they marry a black person lefties are bitching that "they just want mixed race babies!"
You would think they would celebrate this trend, but instead, its met with skepticism because lefties want to maintain separate special victim statuses for groups.
Cant have the whites accessing that. The end result of their attitudes and policies really are something that would make the KKK blush
See also: white Hispanics!
Latino-passing-for-white.
as soon as Democrats start losing votes in the latino voter base it will become acceptable to talk about preserving american culture again.
Perhaps if the Democrats weren't attempting to enable White Separatism peoples' blood wouldn't be up so much?
The placement of "connects" in The New Yorker quote is hilarious. If he'd just scribbled "White replacement theory: see 2020 DNC platform." would it still be a manifesto?
Noel Ignatiev never set out to be a hero. His goal was quite the opposite: to be a “traitor” to a race that for much of his life would not accept him and whose inherent toxicity, he believed, would permanently impede the possibility of the United States living up to its ideals.
On November 9, the historian died, leaving behind a body of work explaining why and how Americans ought to abolish “whiteness”. As the country faces a surge in white supremacist violence and rhetoric, there may be no better time to engage with – and embrace – his ideas.
What is the Whiteness Pandemic?
100% mainstream thought. Uncontroversial, out there, in your face, every day, acceptable racism.
Deconstructing Whiteness Working Group
WHO ARE WE?
We’re a group of faculty and staff who work to address racism by taking a hard look at how we have been socialized into whiteness and white supremacy, and how we perpetuate these through personal behaviors and organizational systems. We hope to transform the way we show up in our work and personal lives to decrease and eliminate the burden on our peers who are Black, Indigenous, or People of Color; deeply and authentically connect with others, ourselves, and humanity; and foster long-term commitment to anti-racist thought and action.
WHAT DO WE DO?
In twice monthly meetings, we work to nurture a brave space for us to identify how we are shaped by whiteness and be accountable for our ideas and behaviors. We create, support, and amplify campus efforts that increase racial literacy, and take responsibility for our actions that perpetuate oppression. And, importantly, we follow the lead of UO Black, Indigenous, and People of Color led initiatives and recommendations to promote anti-racist actions.
Just for the record:
White is a color (POC). Science.
Citing a lack of lifeguards as a fault of not allowing enough immigration is disingenuous at best. Lifeguards at pools are almost all highschoolers. The problem isn't immigration the problem is a declining society that praises teenagers for being lazy jackasses so long as they post their activism on tic toc
One economics expert, writing in my local newspaper, cited the "on going war in Ukraine" as one reason why teenagers don't want to work this summer. Where do they find such "experts?"
At beaches lifeguards are mostly college kids.
Just be sure to check local laws.
When I was in high school, a bunch of us took a trip to Myrtle Beach.
Turns out all the lifeguards at state park type beaches are county deputies.
(we were camping to save our money for underage drinking)
I can't believe I'm still the only one on the previous thread about the streaming shooter pointing out the public value of leaving the live stream up: the opportunity for people to see where he was going, and to get out of his way! Nobody's arguing against me, but nobody else seems to be acknowledging this either.
Some of us are still in 1996 at the first order notion that the 1A, not S230, protects Twitch's choice to broadcast it and the quasi-religious "Good Samaritanism" is supposed to be a court-defense, explicitly not a legislative one. That the call to take it down, made "on the ground" or "in the moment" is supposed to be a personal decision rightness or wrongness decided by 12 angry people, if a judge ever allowed it to come to that. Once you assume the decision can't be made rightly or wrongly by one person in the moment, your minority opinion means dick.
I agree with your take. I also see how victims and their families might not want the shooting live streamed. Either way, I wasn't the one making the decision in real time.
The odds that a victim would even know of the stream, much less be watching, are astronomically low.
And the only reason people watch Twitch are for the titty streams.
I was unaware of this. Guess I need to check out twitch.
If you're into super-waif-ey young girls, you'll be in 7th heaven. Just keep the volume muted is all I can suggest.
I read that as "my titty streams"
The theory is that the bad actor wants the attention, and showing it on camera glorifies the action and encourages others to do it.
It's why they stopped showing streakers at sporting events a few years ago.
Did not showing streakers stop streaking at sporting events?
Nope, but live viewers do miss out on the hilarity of one of the players laying the streaker out.
The people who will want to expand the ministry of truth and the thought police think they are on the right side of history.
After the thought police, there's only one thing left.
That picture. Who's more likely to die in office, Biden or Pelosi?
Why not both?
Please, God; not before November!
She looks like Michael Jackson got brought back to life to do a remake of the "Thriller" video.
She's also apparently so fucking delusional and disconnected from reality that she seriously believes she's still going to be Speaker of the House next year. I still think she's going to tap out quickly once reality hits her in her shriveled up old ass.
Don't underestimate a fortified election with no widespread fraud.
Well, if there isn’t much advantage anymore to being White, people will just start saying they are something else, which is in fact the main reason Whites have shrunk as a percentage of population. Being first generation Greek, with Middle Eastern/North African genetics, I can now say I am Middle Eastern American, which, though technically Caucasian, are considered Brown People by the Woke Ministry of Truth. So there…
Like a politition claiming to be a minority in order to be a diversity hire at Harvard?
Everyone born in America is a native American.
The largest race in USA is 'decline to say'.
Not so important, but a wonderful example of Fortified Democracy, Eurovision detects some incorrect votes in six countries and works quickly to correct them:
...certain irregular voting patterns were identified in the results of six countries.
In order to comply with the Contest’s Voting Instructions, the EBU worked with its voting partner to calculate a substitute aggregated result for each country concerned for both the Second-Semi Final and the Grand Final (calculated based on the results of other countries with similar voting records)
https://eurovision.tv/mediacentre/release/ebu-statement-voting-during-2022-shows
Even talent shows need fortification.
It would seem that 90% of the commenters here are far-right white nationalist MAGA Republicans claiming to be libertarians and deathly afraid of being replaced by those other humans.
It's not like your allies haven't been promoting such a strategy for the last 25 years or so.
This is not an instance of "white supremacist" terrorism. This was one guy with some major loose screws in his head who was below the radar enough he could buy a firearm.
But, we already know how this is going to run in the media and political circles.
If he now claims to be Muslim, he will be promoted to "lone wolf terrorist".
I remember back when all those pictures of Joe Biden getting uncomfortably familiar with young girls while on the floor of the senate were going around, and everyone had fun speculating as to what was really up with that. Then all of a sudden we learned there was this incredibly popular conspiracy theory that nobody had ever heard of before called Q-Anon and that if you thought Joe looked creepy in the pictures it was because you were a Q-Anon member.
Now people have been pointing out that the reason democrats are suddenly - unlike their stance in the 1990s - all for open borders is because they are racial essentialists and assume they will get these immigrant’s votes in gratitude unto the Nth generation. And suddenly we learn that noticing this fact about Democrats is racist and that it makes us members of an incredibly popular conspiracy theory we’ve never heard of before called Replacement Theory.
It's not that the so called supremecists are necessarily actual supremecists. Post an actual rational point on the fact there are racist groups of every single color and ethnicity, including mixed racists mind you, that America is the most racist country in the world, that whitey is in fact outnumbered and targeted, then you too will be nouned as a white supremecist. And the funniest thing of that is, it's not just all the racist groups that will do that, it's the ACTUAL white supremacists them selves calling you a white supremacist! Dixicrats be like, "you're a white supremacist." Pfft...
Umm another thing to point out all those clames you cite he said are all actually true.
The issue we need to address is not baby milk, not so much anyway, Peta IS poisoning the milk with something after all. The issue is what are we going to do about all this racism sht? The nepotists are throwing racism under the bus as it's often used as kryptonite on nepotism. Not really a justifiable reason. Goal, sure, reason, not so much. There's no way for racism to be a natural instinct. However, nepotism is a core fundamental principal of evolution. Racism was invented only recently in human history. "Race" is a fundamental principle of Darwin's expanded theory of evolution. Like almost every word in every language, "race" is a set of reified fallacies to codify perception and give rise to communication. But "race" is a particularly disgusting web of fallacies and from whole cloth it was created for the purpose of British foreign and domestic policy. With it, the nepotists there justified nepotism and slippery sloped in support of aristocracy. If race is a thing the one step further nepotism is justifiable. If nepotism is justifiable then aristocracy is justifiable. Look how the word race has an intended equivocation fallacy to it. By making you think you're a part of a greater whole, you can release your nepotist overlords from responsibility for their tyranny over you. Make you think it's part of some kind of common good. There's no "race" there's no starting gun and there's no finish line. There's no reason to maintain one, there's no reason to destroy one. Anyone can make up a word and write a definition for it. Neither the word, the definition, or everyone who ever used it, proves it's a real thing. By the same way "racism" supports nepotism, it can be used to take power from nepotism also. This is what the nepotists don't like. Being brought low by their own creation. By racists joining together they can take power back from their associated nepotists. It has become a kind of narcotic nepotism is addicted to. Note, Nancy is a big godamn nepotist. She's trying to move away from her racists and move into a new demographic who've ready to overlook her rampant nepotism. People who will forgive her very obvious handing substantial construction contracts to close relatives. They say we're not a democracy or a republic either. We're afunctional corruption where who you know not what you know matters most. Yaknow, a perfect example of any third world shithole. No wonder that's exactly where we're headed and why that has the support of every third world shithole.
Doom (:
BTW, see my reply
"It connects things such as abortion, immigration, gay rights, feminism, residential integration—all of these are seen as part of a series of threats to the white birth rate."
This is all completely true. I've personally met these people. In my home town it's the lothlorian which sits next to the University of Wisconsin Madison. And i'll add, they're a brothel, gay cult, bag of lesbian feminazis, major drug hub, Cia safe house, Satanists, hippies, pederasts, after party for jellobiafra and most every rockstar and fresh moviestar, mafia humantraficers(mostly through foster care channels), and not even half of it is on the actual lothlorian castle property. Yeah, it's actually a lot worse than simply
"It connects things such as abortion, immigration, gay rights, feminism, residential integration—all of these are seen as part of a series of threats to the white birth rate."
That
And it's perfectly true. So the question is, do we just pretend it's ridiculous? How's that working out?
We need to think about this cuz there's no way in he'll anyone is handing their 2nd amendment rights to the loth.
I think Pelosi should be drug tested 3 times a week.
An old bag like Nancy probably only has two blood cells left in her south American catholic pederast heroin cartel dope stream
Manifesto's tend to be known more for their verbosity rather than depth of thought.