Alcohol Delivery Doesn't Lead To Underage Drinking
The history of wine delivery is pretty clear.
Since the beginning of the pandemic, America has seen a drastic overhaul of alcohol laws. To-go cocktails are legal in most states, ordering a six-pack with your weekly grocery delivery order is now commonplace, and some locales have even started revisiting their open container laws to allow more outside drinking.
While most Americans have cheered these reforms, there has also been pushback. A common concern about alcohol delivery is that it could somehow provide a backdoor route for more underage kids to access alcohol. Although this may sound scary, America has experimented with alcohol delivery before, and new research shows alcohol delivery historically has not led to more underage drinking.
It may be tempting to conjure up scary images of children ordering booze via Mom and Dad's Instacart account. But any sale of an alcoholic beverage, whether it occurs through a delivery app or at a brick-and-mortar store, provides a point-of-access in which an underage individual could obtain alcohol.
Early on in the pandemic, states like California sounded the alarm with news headlines about booze being left on people's doorsteps and delivery services making no effort to check the IDs of purchasers. But many were quick to overlook the fact that food delivery companies were suddenly onboarding alcohol delivery services virtually overnight as more and more states started greenlighting booze delivery, thereby leading to some of these early implementation failures.
Likewise overlooked was the fact that brick-and-mortar restaurants and liquor stores also frequently don't ID their customers—as proven by the many sting operations that make headlines when the bar down the street is caught selling drinks to underage patrons.
Amid these anecdotal headlines, what has been missing from the conversation is any systematic or empirical attempt to actually study whether alcohol being delivered to a customer's doorstep is likely to cause a spike in underage drinking. While it's too soon to study the impacts of the COVID-19 alcohol delivery reforms, there is one form of alcohol delivery that has been around for decades in America: direct-to-consumer wine shipments.
Starting in the 1980s, states began passing laws that allowed wineries to ship their products across state lines to their customers. Today, nearly every state allows direct-to-consumer wine deliveries—although only a small handful permit direct beer and distilled spirits shipments.
Decades of experience with direct-to-consumer wine shipments provide policy makers with a ready historical dataset from which they can analyze the potential impacts of alcohol delivery on underage drinking. Specifically, underage drinking has been tracked for decades by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System survey. The CDC survey asks, among other things, if high school students have had at least one alcoholic beverage in the past 30 days.
From the outset, it's clear that underage drinking has been in a near free-fall over the past few decades. In 1991, over 50 percent of high schoolers drank alcohol, whereas only 29 percent do so today.
But even more interesting for the purpose of alcohol delivery, the data reveals that states that have continuously allowed direct-to-consumer wine delivery over the past few decades have actually seen a larger decline in underage alcohol consumption than states that prohibited wine shipments. Namely, states that allowed direct wine shipments from 2003 to 2019 saw a 44.3 percent decline in underage drinking compared to a 43 percent decline in states that forbid it during that entire timespan.
Furthermore, states that engaged in the most robust forms of direct-to-consumer wine delivery reforms between 2003 to 2019—by going from no direct wine delivery at all to full-fledged wine delivery—saw a larger decline in underage drinking than states that engaged in more modest reforms.
In other words, the more permissible states were with direct-to-consumer wine shipments, the more their underage drinking rates fell. This does not prove that direct wine shipments actually cause less underage drinking, but it does demonstrate that alcohol delivery is not correlated with more underage drinking.
As more and more states debate whether to modernize their alcohol delivery rules, the data surrounding direct-to-consumer wine delivery reforms should be heeded. Alcohol delivery does not inevitably lead to more underage drinking, and policy makers would be wise to listen to the evidence.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
…. policy makers would be wise to listen to the evidence.
That’s not what motivates policy makers.
Looking for a few delivered supply of earnings? This is how you could make a respectable earnings each month! After being with out paintings for six months, I commenced finishing a easy on-line paintings over this internet site I located on-line, and I could not be happier now. (res32) After three months of doing this my month-to-month earnings improved through $30,000 in line with month through running for simply numerous hours in line with week… https://googleworksoffer96.blogspot.com/
It is also not what motivates the business interests that underwrite articles such as this one.
America has experimented with unregulated alcohol. It was a society-warping disaster. That does not vindicate all alcohol regulation, not nearly, but it indicates those who contend alcohol should be treated like juice or soda should have scant place in reasoned debate about alcohol regulation (and are often funded by those motivated by profit rather than by sound policy).
If by “unregulated alcohol” you mean “Prohibition”.
and beer and wine are better for you than juice or soda.
Who in the hell is saying alcohol should be treated like juice or soda?
Or were the voices in your head again?
You mean to tell me youths have abandoned the time honored way of securing beer — getting someone’s over-21 brother to purchase it for you — to now ordering the latest trending Sonoma pinot noir on the internet?
When I read “alcohol delivery” and “underage drinking” in the title, I immediately had flashbacks to stories of vodka soaked butt tampons.
Thanks for your beyond belief blogs stuff. Check out this! structural engineers dublin
Dammit, I wanted “d” as my user name. Fucking spammers.
Tangentially related: Here in Spain, there is something I haven’t since the ’80s in the States. Cigarette machines. I though it sold candy at first until I had a good look at it.
Yeah, I agree. It really seems like even innovative delivery systems can’t reverse the fact that the kids nowadays are lame.
Sexe Femme is web place created for your own chat pleasure with fine ladies in France
“Little Brother Surveillance” might be a factor. Online deliveries probably require accounts and credit cards – monitored tightly by moms and dads.
So the kids can’t pay cash, there is a digital record of everything delivered. Many homes also have front door cameras, etc. The 21st Century totalitarian homestead!
policy makers listen to whoever is holding the dollar-sign-bag.
The brick and mortar liquor stores are the ones sounding the alarm here because they don’t want to lose business to online sales. So they create a scary story that teens could get their hands on booze. Guess what? Those who want to will find a way.
Today, nearly every state allows direct-to-consumer wine deliveries—although only a small handful permit direct beer and distilled spirits shipments.
Well, obviously. Beer is for the working man, and the demon rum is still a demon. Wine is sophisticated.
For the same reason “sugary drink taxes for public health” hit Pepsi but not lattes and cappuccinos.
It’s for the children! You don’t… HATE… children… do you??
Newsflash: teenagers have always found ways to get booze, weed, whatever… As long as there have been restrictions, there have been workarounds
If you haven’t been drinking heavily the past 18 months, then you haven’t been paying attention.
Or you’re a strict adherent to the Mormon faith.
“Specifically, underage drinking has been tracked for decades by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System survey. ”
More of the CDC doing things that have no relation to it’s existence.
Sorry but your premise doesn’t match the facts (“Alcohol Delivery Doesn’t Lead to Underage Drinking”.
Read this:
https://endeavors.unc.edu/the_ease_of_buying_booze
This was a University of North Carolina study to determine how difficult it is for minors to buy alcohol from internet vendors. The answer: not very.
Underage study participants successfully purchased alcohol on 45 out of 100 tightly controlled attempts. They did not use fake IDs, and they had to provide their real IDs when asked. Only 12 orders failed immediately when the participant placed the online order or shortly afterward.
18-20YOs aren’t “minors”.
Underage drinking by kids AND young adults has always been a failsafe boogeyman to press for more regulations, which is why age-regulated industries have fallen all over themselves to endorse and apply supermajority purchase ages, and not resisted legislative action in that regard.
Alcohol was first, followed by credit cards and most recently tobacco and vapes. Legal weed would not be a thing without a 21 purchase age. Make your vice’s legal age 21, and watch the push for regs disappear, like so much vapor (pun intended).
The nekkid bars and casinos knew this trick from a long time back.
I don’t know if this was the intent of Candy Lightner and MADD’s ugly baby in the 21 drinking age, but here we are.
What vice is next? Lottery tickets? R-rated movies? Pr0n? Camming?