Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
    • Reason TV
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • Free Media
    • The Reason Interview
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • Freed Up
    • The Soho Forum Debates
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Log In

Create new account

Iran

New Attacks in Hormuz

Plus: a different type of pizzagate, Kevin Warsh as the new Jerome Powell, and more...

Liz Wolfe | 5.14.2026 9:31 AM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
Hormuz-5-14 | Tanya Rico/Dreamstime
(Tanya Rico/Dreamstime)

The Strait of Hormuz sees more attacks: "In the latest incident on the trade route, an Indian cargo vessel carrying livestock from Africa to the United Arab Emirates was sunk on Thursday in waters off the coast of Oman," reports Reuters. All 14 crew members were rescued. But in a separate incident, "British maritime ​security agency UKMTO reported on Thursday that 'unauthorised personnel' had boarded a ship anchored off the coast of the United Arab Emirates port of Fujairah, and were steering it towards Iran." Japanese and Chinese tankers have successfully brokered deals with Iranian authorities to pass through this week, with Chinese shipping companies in particular becoming rather obsequious toward Iran in a bid to ensure safety.

For a while during the war, an average of eight ships had been passing through the strait daily, down from a daily average of 130 prior to tensions escalating. Now, it's rebounded a bit: roughly 30 ships have passed through between Wednesday evening and now. But Iran is very much in control, and one must curry favor with it to guarantee safe passage. President Donald Trump's attempt last week to shepherd ships through fell flat and was paused indefinitely.

The Reason Roundup Newsletter by Liz Wolfe Liz and Reason help you make sense of the day's news every morning.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Now Trump's strategy appears to hinge on getting China "to play a more active role in getting Iran to walk away from what they're doing now," Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters aboard Air Force One as they traveled to meet Chinese leader Xi Jinping in Beijing.

But "this is not how President Trump wanted to arrive in China," notes The New York Times' David E. Sanger. "When he delayed his long-awaited trip to Beijing by six weeks, Mr. Trump was betting he would arrive in Beijing this week having forced the Iranians to capitulate to his demands. He anticipated that by now the shattered Iranian leadership would have agreed to turn over its nuclear stockpile, forgo its atomic ambitions and reopen the Strait of Hormuz. The message to President Xi Jinping would have been clear: Chinese declarations of a superpower in decline were premature."

None of this ended up happening. Instead, Trump's "Project Freedom" failed; war in Iran has been sort of stopped, but with very few American objectives achieved; and the Strait of Hormuz is mostly controlled by Iran, with Chinese shipping vessels able to get through by allying more closely with our adversaries (at least for now). It's also a bit awkward for Xi: He has not come to Iran's aid in a significant way. His global ambitions appear to be at least part bluster.

It's not clear how Trump hopes to influence Xi. He's brought his CEO buddies (Tesla's Elon Musk, Apple's Tim Cook, and Goldman Sachs' David Solomon) to the summit with him. China hawks have mostly disappeared within the administration. He doesn't have a ton of leverage, and the chief negotiator leading up to the Beijing summit has been Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, not Marco Rubio, signaling the degree to which tariffs are the primary focus. There had been thought that Trump would take this moment to try to begin negotiations on nuclear weapons control, but China signaled that "there is no reason to enter negotiations with Washington and Moscow until Beijing has an arsenal comparable to those of the two other powers" and that a new accord would be a non-starter. So now Trump needs to figure out what the future of the Iran war and the Strait of Hormuz looks like, and it's not clear that China will be any help at all. Good luck.


Scenes from New York: I'm still in Texas, but I must interrupt our programming with an urgent update on how the state might ruin New York pizza.

Before Gov. Kathy Hochul is a bill, already passed by state legislators, called the Food Safety and Chemical Disclosure Act, which would ban potassium bromate, propylparaben, and Red Dye No. 3 from food. But bromated flour is a big part of why New York pizza and bagels are so good: It makes dough springy and stretchy, making the finished product light and airy. Almost all commercial bakeries use it.

"Bromate, when applied within the prescribed limits (15-30ppm), is completely used up during the bake leaving no trace in the finished product," notes King Arthur, the baking company (not the man). "However, if too much is used, or the bread is not baked long enough or at a high enough temperature, then a residual amount will remain." Regulators are worried specifically about links between bromate and cancer, since scientists in the '80s linked the ingredient to tumors in rats, and are now seeking bans akin to those already found in the European Union and Canada. Some bakers have already switched over, but unbromated flour is about twice as pricey as its equivalent, creating a less-consistent product.

If I can choose between dying at 75 after a lifetime of pizza eating and dying at 80 or 85 having been deprived myself of one of life's great pleasures, I know exactly what I'd choose. (And I'm reminded of the great line from Girls, yelled by Jemima Kirke during a brutal fight with her husband-for-three-weeks: "I am going to look 50 when I'm 30! I am going to be so fucking fat, like Nico! And you know why? That's because I'm going to be full of experiences.") Whether it's cancer or obesity, something's gonna get us all at some point. I'm not sure the state should ruin all that is good and holy in an attempt to extend the lives of its subjects.


QUICK HITS

  • The Senate just confirmed Kevin Warsh as the new chair of the Federal Reserve. We'll see what Warsh is like in practice, but he seems pretty likely to do whatever Trump asks.
  • The president "has green-lighted the sale of advanced AI chips to Beijing, even as Congress warned about espionage risks," notes Politico. "He signed off on a deal to allow Chinese-founded TikTok to continue operating in the U.S., despite intelligence concerns. And his National Defense Strategy abandoned tough rhetoric on China for a more conciliatory tone as the administration focuses on protecting the homeland."
  • I can't believe it took me until now to realize that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wrote a children's book on St. Francis of Assisi. I like that our favorite bear-dumping-in-Central-Park/divorced/addict/affair-having falconer now in charge of massive swaths of the health bureaucracy takes his patron saint so seriously.
  • Very cool:

In adults, limiting smartphone functionality to texting and calls and blocking all social media and mobile internet for 2 weeks significantly improved attention, self-reported well-being and mental health. 90% of participants experienced a benefit. pic.twitter.com/fkkbx780hz

— Diana S. Fleischman (@sentientist) May 13, 2026

  • There's a lot of parenting discourse happening now, set off by a new mom talking about whether she could leave her baby asleep in their Japanese lodgings and go down the block to a restaurant, bringing the monitor with her:

Also, there's a lot of grey area that we're not prepared to deal with. Do these people think cps should be called on a 6-year-old who walks to the nearby bodega by himself? What about the 8-year-old using the subway or bus on his own? What about the mom who hires a 12-year-old to… https://t.co/1gmAPM8Jmm

— Liz Wolfe (@LizWolfeReason) May 13, 2026

In very Aella fashion, the mom in question has started polling followers on where they draw the lines:

parents: imagine you're good friends with the neighbors 2 doors down. would you put your baby down for the night and go neighbor's house for a drink if you brought the baby monitor?

— Romy (@Romy_Holland) May 12, 2026

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: How Much Deference Does SCOTUS Owe to Congress?

Liz Wolfe is an associate editor at Reason.

IranMiddle EastWarMilitaryTrump AdministrationNew YorkPoliticsReason Roundup
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL Add Reason to Google
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Show Comments (23)

Latest

New Attacks in Hormuz

Liz Wolfe | 5.14.2026 9:31 AM

How Much Deference Does SCOTUS Owe to Congress?

Damon Root | 5.14.2026 7:00 AM

Are Democrats Now the Party of Free Markets? Don't Bet on It.

Stephanie Slade | From the June 2026 issue

Brickbat: Slow Down

Charles Oliver | 5.14.2026 4:00 AM

Whistleblower Tells Congress the CIA Illegally Spied on White House Officials Investigating COVID Origins

Christian Britschgi | 5.13.2026 5:25 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS Add Reason to Google

© 2026 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

I WANT FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS!

Help Reason push back with more of the fact-based reporting we do best. Your support means more reporters, more investigations, and more coverage.

Make a donation today! No thanks
r

I WANT TO FUND FREE MINDS AND FREE MARKETS

Every dollar I give helps to fund more journalists, more videos, and more amazing stories that celebrate liberty.

Yes! I want to put my money where your mouth is! Not interested
r

SUPPORT HONEST JOURNALISM

So much of the media tries telling you what to think. Support journalism that helps you to think for yourself.

I’ll donate to Reason right now! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK

Push back against misleading media lies and bad ideas. Support Reason’s journalism today.

My donation today will help Reason push back! Not today
r

HELP KEEP MEDIA FREE & FEARLESS

Back journalism committed to transparency, independence, and intellectual honesty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

STAND FOR FREE MINDS

Support journalism that challenges central planning, big government overreach, and creeping socialism.

Yes, I’ll support Reason today! No thanks
r

PUSH BACK AGAINST SOCIALIST IDEAS

Support journalism that exposes bad economics, failed policies, and threats to open markets.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BAD IDEAS WITH FACTS

Back independent media that examines the real-world consequences of socialist policies.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BAD ECONOMIC IDEAS ARE EVERYWHERE. LET’S FIGHT BACK.

Support journalism that challenges government overreach with rational analysis and clear reasoning.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

JOIN THE FIGHT FOR FREEDOM

Support journalism that challenges centralized power and defends individual liberty.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

BACK JOURNALISM THAT PUSHES BACK AGAINST SOCIALISM

Your support helps expose the real-world costs of socialist policy proposals—and highlight better alternatives.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks
r

FIGHT BACK AGAINST BAD ECONOMICS.

Donate today to fuel reporting that exposes the real costs of heavy-handed government.

Yes, I’ll donate to Reason today! No thanks