States Are Flush With Cash
There's a lesson here for the federal government the next time a national economic crisis strikes: The states don't need bailouts.

As state legislators kicked off their 2022 sessions this spring and started planning new budgets, many found that their tax coffers were overflowing. What lawmakers do with that extra money could have long-range consequences.
The excess revenue resulted from a convergence of two windfalls. State tax collections rose sharply in 2021 as the pandemic waned, businesses fully reopened, and consumers started spending again. And the federal government showered states with more than $360 billion as part of the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, passed in March 2021. The passage of President Joe Biden's $1 trillion infrastructure bill means even more federal taxpayer money for state treasuries in the near future.
All told, state revenues (including federal funds) increased by more than 12 percent in 2021, according to data from the Pew Charitable Trusts. Thirty-two states reported higher than expected revenue in 2021, according to the National Association of State Budget Officers.
As a result, many states now have significant year-over-year budget surpluses for the current year. California leads the way with a $31 billion surplus—an amount larger than many states' entire annual budgets. Florida ($11.2 billion surplus), Maryland ($4.6 billion), Minnesota ($7.7 billion), and Virginia ($2.6 billion) also have large cash reserves. But state lawmakers should be careful about letting the extra dough burn a hole in their pockets.
"It's understandable that there is all this pent-up demand for different kinds of new programs or tax cuts," says Josh Goodman, a senior officer with Pew's state fiscal health initiative. The impulse to use surpluses for pet projects, Goodman says, ignores data that suggest many states are running long-term structural deficits—largely due to pension obligations and health care costs in programs like Medicaid. "The question is not just what's the budget situation this year," Goodman says, "but what is the budget -situation going to be five or 10 years down the road."
California Gov. Gavin Newsom and New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, both Democrats, have outlined plans for huge increases in spending on schools and social programs. Both also want to set aside some of the excess revenue in a reserve account for future years.
Another option is to return as much of the surplus as possible to taxpayers via temporary tax breaks. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, a Republican, has proposed using $1 billion of the state's surplus to fund a gas tax holiday for the state's drivers amid unusually high fuel prices.
There's also a lesson here for the federal government the next time a national economic crisis strikes: The states don't need bailouts.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
I would like my money back.
Start now earning every week more than $5,000 by doing very simple and easy home based job online. Last month I have made $30,000 by doing this online job just in my part (re85) time for only 2 hrs. a day using my laptop. This job is just awesome and easy to do in part time. Everybody can now get this and start earning more dollars online just by:-
.
CLICK HERE:>>> https://dollarscash12.blogspot.com/
That's not how communist countries work!!!
It's not 'Your' anything -- It's OURS!!!
Speaks every Democrat I've ever met.
What's that? Did I hear someone say "more bailouts?" because I thought I heard "more bailouts"! Money printer go brrrrrr!!!
"amid unusually high fuel prices."
Actually, as these prices are a direct result of democrat party policies, they are as 'usual' as each election where democrats win.
Remember, remember, the eighth of November.
Fuel prices are a result of the rising price of a global commodity. Maybe you think Democrats have the power to cause fuel prices to rise worldwide. I don't.
Oil in sold in dollars that are becoming less valuable each day.
Maybe you think Democrats have the power to cause fuel prices to rise worldwide
You mean like by using the administrative state to restrict the oil production of the world's largest oil producer and fanning war flames with the world's second largest oil producer?
Like this?
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/31/biden-to-tap-oil-reserves-use-wartime-powers-to-limit-fuel-shocks-00022020
So over a year after the regime put a stop to new oil production projects in the US and nearly a month after it got the European war it was clamoring for, its plan to alleviate the oil crisis it created is to pump the strategic reserve dry and demand that those oil producers they regulated to a halt start drilling for more oil despite their regulations, proclaiming with a shit-eating grin that "There is nothing standing in their way.”
This is almost as good as the Biden regime's plan to beg the Saudi regime for a bailout.
I was simply refuting the point that domestic oil production is restricted. Quite the opposite. Too little too late? Probably.
Too little too late?
It's not even too little, it's literally nothing. The regime is simply demanding that companies do something.
Well it's not the restrictions you were talking about. Not trying to defend the guy here, but if you're going to bash his policies you should at least get them right.
If you truly think Biden has not restricted US domestic oil production, you are as loony as everyone says.
I had remembered something in the news about him opening up drilling in federal lands, so I looked it up. Sure enough that's the case. Unless I'm reading this wrong and opening means restricting.
You are seriously approaching shrike levels of stupid.
Day 1 Biden ended all new permits. The permits that get credited to him by Shrike were permits sold under Trump in December of the year prior.
It was only last week that Biden opened up permits for new drilling at much higher costs and very limited.
Drilling also requires transportation, and Biden's administration has put barriers into place to allow for transport from site to refiner. One example is Keystone, but even with trucking they have not permitted various cites for easements in order to access drilled oil.
You really are an ignorant leftist at this point.
Know what? I'm sorry. I was wrong. I forgot that when the facts and the narrative conflict, that the narrative is always correct.
Poor sarc.
Not to mention, sooner or later that oil in the strategic reserve will need to be replaced -- likely at a higher price than we 'sold' it for.
All I was saying was that the claim that Biden is currently restricting domestic production is false. I'm not singing the guy's praises. Just saying if you're gonna bash the guy, at least to it honestly.
But what about rig count?
You don't think? We knew that.
The excess revenue resulted from a convergence of two windfalls.
Where's Fiona and OBL? The fact that CA and FL had the biggest surpluses is begging to have a question begged to be hit with Reason's one-size-fits all immigration mallet.
The surpluses are due to the increased value immigrants bring.
Am I doing this right?
No. To do it right, you need to connect the surplus with a need to import more immigrants.
If we only had more needy immigrants we could expand government programs and spend down that surplus in a jiffy.
Both also want to set aside some of the excess revenue in a reserve account for future years.
They say want to. But they won't. Something will come up.
"There's a lesson here for the federal government the next time a national economic crisis strikes: The states don't need bailouts."
Do massively over-promised and under-funded pensions (and other state largesse) count as crises? Asking for a friend (hush, Gavin).
States Are Flush With Cash
Hey Diane, how's the debt situation going?
Umm, I have $400 Billion in outstanding liabilities.
How much you got in your pocket right now?
Eh, around $50,000 dollars.
Wow, you're flush with cash!
This.
SOOOO much this.
Yes and I just had to cut a check to my state for more taxes. Close to retiring to a non theft state.
me too
Whether or not the states need bailouts depends on whether or not the state public employee pensions are at risk, and which party is in power.
A rule to live by would be anything Newsom or Cali is doing, do the opposite.