COVID Stimulus Checks Worsened Inflation
Four economists at the Federal Reserve say America's high rate of inflation relative to the rest of the world is the result of surging disposable income during the pandemic.

Inflation has surged across much of the developed world in the past year as COVID-19 lockdowns eased and pent-up demand for goods and services collided with ongoing supply chain snafus.
But inflation is running higher in the United States than just about anywhere else right now. Why's that? According to a new paper from four economists at the Federal Reserve of San Francisco, it's because the American government was relatively more generous during the pandemic, borrowing and spending trillions of dollars to not only fund COVID-19 relief efforts but to line the pockets of Americans with direct payments that enlarged the money supply and overheated the economy.
"Inflation rates in the United States and other developed economies have closely tracked each other historically," the economists write in an analysis published this week. "However, since the first half of 2021, U.S. inflation has increasingly outpaced inflation in other developed countries. Estimates suggest that fiscal support measures designed to counteract the severity of the pandemic's economic effect may have contributed to this divergence."
Inflation in the U.S. hit an annualized rate of 7.9 percent in February (data for March will be released by the Bureau for Labor Statistics next week), a 40-year high. Meanwhile, inflation in similar countries like France (3.6 percent), Germany (5.1 percent), and the United Kingdom (5.5 percent) is significantly lower, according to data from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), a consortium of 38 rich-world governments. (Across the OECD as a whole, the average annual inflation rate is about the same as the U.S., but that's due to the influence of outliers like Argentina—where prices are up over 52 percent in the past 12 months.)
February's global price data are not merely a snapshot, but indicative of a worrying trend. The Pew Research Center noted in November of last year that prices in the United States were rising more quickly than almost anywhere else. Between the third quarter of 2019 (the last full economic quarter before COVID-19 was first identified) and the third quarter of 2021, the U.S. inflation rate climbed by 3.58 percentage points—a larger change than in all but two other countries of the 46 nations included in the study.
Governments all over the world spent heavily to combat the pandemic, of course, but few handed out cash directly to citizens as the American government did. The four Federal Reserve researchers track sharp increases in "inflation-adjusted disposable personal income"—in layman's terms, excess spending cash—reported by American households over the past two years. "Throughout 2020 and 2021, U.S. households experienced significantly higher increases in their disposable income relative to their OECD peers," they write.
About $817 billion in direct payments to American households were delivered in three rounds during the pandemic, according to the COVID Money Tracker run by the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget, a nonprofit that advocates for lower deficits. The first round of stimulus checks was worth $1,200 per person and was approved as part of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act in March 2020. Another round of $600 checks was distributed starting in December of that year.

But the big blow came in early 2021, when the Biden administration pushed through a round of $1,400 checks as part of the American Recovery Plan, passed by Congress in March 2021.
Though each round of direct checks had slightly different parameters for determining who would get the payments, much of that $817 billion landed in the bank accounts of people who had never lost their jobs and were well above the poverty line. Households earning as much as $160,000 in joint income were eligible for the final round of direct payments disbursed during the first half of 2021—and many progressives in Congress thought the cutoff should have been even higher.
We're now reaping what Congress sowed. All that excess cash is chasing the same number of goods. That's a recipe for inflation straight out of any economics textbook. The four economists conclude that "U.S. income transfers may have contributed to an increase in inflation of about 3 percentage points by the fourth quarter of 2021."
This isn't a novel idea, of course. Larry Summers, one of the Obama administration's top economic advisers, was warning about rising inflation more than a year ago. Passing another stimulus bill in the spring of 2021, Summers warned in a Washington Post op-ed, "will set off inflationary pressures of a kind we have not seen in a generation." Other top economists, including a former chairman of the International Monetary Fund, offered similar warnings. The Biden administration and Democrats in Congress did not listen, and now here we are.
The value of this Federal Reserve analysis is that it does not look forward in time and try to project what will happen, but reviews existing data to tell what did in fact happen. Putting more money directly in Americans' pockets and bank accounts caused inflation to get worse than it otherwise would have been.
In fairness, the economists also point out that a less robust response to the pandemic may have caused a different kind of economic pain. "Without these spending measures," they write, "the economy might have tipped into outright deflation and slower economic growth, the consequences of which would have been harder to manage."
Any serious attempt to grapple with America's current bout of inflation must be aware of that possible alternate reality—the grass is not necessarily greener on the other side.
But that doesn't absolve the federal government—from the White House to Congress to the Federal Reserve—of its role in worsening this mess. The whole world is suffering through a period of high inflation, but American policy makers added a uniquely high amount of fuel to the fire.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
All inflation is Putin's fault!
(with an assist from Trump and oil companies)
So what these economists are saying is that Putin owns the Biden family.
Biden said there were no legitimate economists blaming inflation on his policies. Fire these illegitimate economists.
Throw them in with the Jan. 6 traitors.
The US needs some violent insurrectionists like the US State Department created in Ukraine. They actually know how to do a real violent insurrection that makes the government run for their lives!
I wish the Federal government had trained and armed the Jan 6 party-goers like they did the Azov Battalion. Then we might have gotten somewhere!
earn money is not possile but it is very easy way to earn money open my profile
It's amazing how much confirmation bias can influence the understanding of what a person reads and then comments.
I digress...
Good grief the lies never stop. Deflation is not bad. Inflation is a man made construct to account for any number of bullshit economic lies. Hell, it doesn't even make any sense. People buying more of something makes the price go up? (Que the assholes about the supply and demand lie, economics 101, etc.), Only in rare instances should this be true. What causes more inflation, besides the lies, is the idea that a company must make MORE profit, every single quarter until the end of time. Now watch the record profits roll in.
30+ years ago prices would be based on cost. Now prices are based on how much can be charged.
If you keep prices the same while shutting down big chunks of the economy and giving people free money... you know what happens? The shelves get empty.
If you only make 100 widgets and 110 people want them, 10 are going without. They can be the 10 who aren't willing to pay as much, or the 10 who get to the store last, or whatever, but no amount of stimulus checks are going to create those 10 extra widgets.
Mild deflation should actually be the norm as technology and manufacturing improvements lessen costs and improve efficiency. Think of the power of that Windows 95 computer and the cost, it was in the thousands of dollars, and what a more powerful computer you can buy at a fraction of the cost today.
Exactly. And the common man would benefit greatly from that deflation. His savings would buy more, not less. His station in life would get better, not worse.
He wouldn't need government to promise to make his life better because the natural course of things would be constantly improving.
The inflation is made possible by fiat currency. And that simple fact will lead to the destruction of American society when the currency fails, just like all other fiat currencies have throughout history. They fail by default or by endless creation but the results are the same.
You get the gold star. Keynesian "economics" is just pure bunk. It is like astrology. You can use very complicated math in astrology but it is just based on something that can't never be measured.
Economics is not physics. It is the study of human action (thank you Von Mises).
It kills me that an govt "economist" always has the line.."productivity is the way economies grow" and then seem to forget it and have these ridiculous "aggregate demand" money printing/artifical low rate policies.
Deflation in a free market is NORMAL..
daveca with spellcheck?
Combo meals at McD's may range from, say, $6.95 to $8.95.
If government sets up a program to hand out vouchers that entitle the bearer to one combo meal of their choosing, not to exceed $10, the cost of combo meals at McD's will soon rise to at least $10. Likely more, since the "old" price of $7 is basically the same out-of-pocket to the purchaser as a $17 combo meal, when $10 is covered by the voucher.
Prices 30 or 100 years ago were always based on what could be charged. The factors like cost and competition drive the price that can be charged. Can't sell widgets for less than it costs to make them and hope to make it up in volume (well, not for long anyway). Can't overcharge for widgets, because you will soon have competitors offering the same widgets or substantially similar--perhaps even better--at lower costs.
You imagine businessmen 30 years ago saying "No, John, we can't charge $10 for a 99-cent Beanie Baby. It's not a fair price, we manufacture them for a buck, and 10% is a fair profit, so we should sell them for $1.10. " Or "Hey, you know, it only costs us 4 cents to press a CD, and we only pay the artist 10 cents per CD, why are we still selling them for $10? It hardly seems fair to make that much profit." Or Nike choosing to sell Air Jordans based on the *cost*?
Deflation is the Great Depression. That’s…..bad.
Ok Bernanke..why then from 1870 to 1910 did the US have strong wage growth, increased living standards, and lower prices all on the horrible gold standard? In fact look at any technological innovation that really impacted productivity and increased living standards..you have deflation.
The "Depression" was caused by idiotic govt actions during a recession caused by the Fed's artifically low rates in the 20's to allow the Brits to not have to devalue the pound (they didnt' want to pay for WWI-hard to tell your people after they lost millions that yes we won but now have a decade of austerity). And then you had two mental midgets (Hoover and FDR) who refused to let prices drop to liquidate the maleinvestments.
Look at how Warren G. Harding handled the Great Recession of 1920...versus the degenerate FDR...
What are you referring to? A can of oil at Auto zone? Cause you can't be referring to the price of oil on the market. That would be kinda of dumb since it is so easily refuted.
"supply and demand lie"
This must be a parody account.
From the article, "The Biden administration and Democrats in Congress did not listen, and now here we are."
The blame is squarely on the Congress. Every House Rep. and every Senator present (some where home self isolating but all expressed their support for the bill), every Democrat, every Republican and any Independent in Congress voted for this bill. Yes Trump signed it, but he had little choice as it would have been immediately overridden, and imagine the rhetoric in an election year if he had vetoed the bill? Trump Hates Americans would have been the cry.
I was for helping only those that needed help, those that lost business and jobs. Giving money to everyone was a vote buying plan by incumbents, nothing less, and I warned you would pay dearly for every non-existent dollar the government put in your account.
I tell you, I tell you, I tell you: Reason was ALL for direct payments. "The GOOD Welfare". Also, what a bunch of cry babies. 7.9% inflation over a period of 12 months, AHHHHH! After a generation of sub 2 inflation, 1 year does not hyperinflation make. US Per Capita income is now well over 70,000 And going WAYYYYY up over the next five years to about 100,000/capita. Jobs are NOT back to normal -- they're more plentiful AND better paying than ever +++++ NOW employers have to compete for labor, and that too is driving inflation -- LIKE THE '70s, when from 77-81 the US added 10,000,000 jobs off of a base of 70 million -- a 15% increase in 4 years. Yes, this added to inflation as well, and so does rich people overpaying for stuff. Inflation is not caused by Putin, it is not caused by Biden, and it is not synonymous with Intolerable human suffering. Particularly not after 1 year in 20 when it is elevated and when it is correlated with EXTREMELY high job growth.
Four economists at the Federal Reserve say America's high rate of inflation relative to the rest of the world is the result of surging disposable income during the pandemic.
I'll bet none of the four are Nobel laureates, are they? All credible economists agree that Biden's massive money printing actually is antiinflationary, you dumbass.
SMH.
Was that sarcasm?
Reason's leading economics expert says the i-word is wingnut.com disinformation. In fact, the Biden economy is the best ever if you examine the metrics that really matter (rig count and Warren Buffett's net worth).
#DefendBidenAtAllCosts
From the article, "The Biden administration and Democrats in Congress did not listen, and now here we are."
You're not sophisticated enough to appreciate how wonderful the Brandon recovery is.
It just occurred to me - the stimulus checks were bribery to get us to set a precedent of voluntary lockdown. Now, we have to keep locking down forever. Oh well, not like the idiots here would have declined $20 and a happy meal for their futures sake.
All that $ has been spent or saved. Does the Fed paper explain why the stimmy checks caused all that inflation while the rest of the Covid spending didn't?
Pumping unearned money into the economy causes inflation. It’s really that simple.
^ This. My innate response to the headline was 'Duh, McFly'.
Maybe because the economy was already recovered and gaining steam so they added more fuel to the fire? I've seen that stated multiple times, in fact that's what Sommers said in his editorial the story cited.
He's got a point.
Stimulus checks, money given directly to The People, accounts for around $600b.
But hasn't the government spent something like $6t on covid?
If stimulus checks account for <50%, that's not where the inflation is solely, or even majority, coming from.
Because that other money was stimulus for the Sophistocrats.
There's still a few hundred billion dollars floating around that were allocated for COVID but not yet delivered and/or spent.
You can count on Reason for "No shit Sherlock headlines"
But at least a year late.
A Headline 2 years in the making!
This is a good example of the “correlation does not mean causation” fallacy. It might be true, but the evidence is not there. It is hard to believe that $1400 per person will drive national inflation line we are seeing.
Except the evidence is there. It's been a constant historically speaking. In almost all inflationary spikes, it's because of currency devaluation as the result of overspending by the government. People have been warning about this for years.
History is littered with the corpses of governments that inflated their currency into oblivion in order to, as Bastiat put it, be "[The] great fiction, through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
Companies, especially oil companies and making massive profits. Gas prices are up, but oil prices are not. The true story is likely far more comply then just “it was the stimulus money”.
Or gas prices are up because the people selling it are anticipating an increase in the price of oil.
Wow, if you're going to lie, at least pick lies that can't be so easily be rebutted. Charts showing crude oil prices are easily (and reliably) available from multiple credible sources on the internet. Crude oil was running about $60 a barrel this time last year. It briefly doubled that and still hovers around 170% of this time last year.
You should also learn to read. The article above already says that the $1400 was only one of the three inflationary payments. The first was for $1200 per person, the second $600 for a total (if you qualified for all three) of $3200 each or $817 Billion over all. Yes, the math shows with reasonable precision that dumping that much incremental cash into an economy will cause the inflation we are seeing.
"if you're going to lie, at least pick lies that can't be so easily be rebutted"
Shrike's modus operandi for some strange reason.
He also told us that:
- After being shut down for Covid, the resumption of drilling activity is an harbinger of economic prosperity brought about by Biden
- High oil prices are unrelated to Biden's drilling bans and pipeline freeze
- Inflation isn't happening (except for smokeless tobacco), and if it does happen it's a good thing
- despite the first Covid bill being veto-proof, and Trump refusing to sign some of the subsequent, Covid spending wasn't Pelosi's fault, but Trump's
- Yes, 43% of the money printed in the same world's history came into existence in the last two years, but that's not what's causing inflation
- He wasn't banned for posting child porn links, he just forgot his password.
$817b/$X?
X = total government spending on covid
Molly can read but it only retains the bits that support its preconceived, statist notions.
Those same oil companies were losing money hand over fist for several years due to low oil prices. It's called the commodities market. Guess what when feeder calves are $1.60 or more a pound, ranchers make a lot of money, when we sell them for $1.10 per pound (which it's been in the not to distant past) we lose our shirts. It's how commodities work you idiot.
https://oilprice.com/
As for your assertion oil prices aren't up, here is today's price in real time. There is a three week lage between spot prices and the pump. And most service stations aren't owned by the oil companies. The buy their refined gas, and really don't want to raise prices to high, because it drives away business, when they raise prices it's reluctantly. They usually end up losing money during periods of high gas prices. And one other thing, the federal government makes more money per gallon of gas sold than the energy companies do. You really don't do any of your own research do you? You just parrot whatever the progressive media tells you and consider yourself smart. You really aren't.
""but oil prices are not.""
What are you referring to? A can of oil at Auto zone? Cause you can't be referring to the price of oil on the market. That would be kinda of dumb since it is so easily refuted.
Get up off of your damn knees.
Moron Molly: "Profits is bad! Corporations is evil! Please save us, Bernie and Liz, and take over the economy!"
Checks out
EXACTLY. The idea prices have to increase because more money is in circulation is as ridiculous as some deflation is bad.
Oil prices are not up? Seriously? You’re freaking delusional.
Refined unleaded gas and the various grades of crude are all separate commodities. So no, they don’t necessarily fluctuate in lockstep.
The money printing overwhelmed the ability for China to absorb our inflation which they have been doing for decades.
You can't run massive deficits funded by expanding the money supply out of thin air while reducing productivity by paying folks not to work. There was never any reason to shut the country down int he first place but if this helps finally destroy keynsian lunacy it will be a good thing.
The government printed up and spent far more than $1400 per person, that's just the crumbs they gave us while spewing trillions to their friends.
^
Trickle down economics.
Weird how they don't consider 'give it all to the government and we will distribute it' as trickle-down.
Because we to call that "spreading the wealth"
we *like* to call that
Or ‘paying off their Allie’s and campaign contributors’.
"The government printed up and spent far more than $1400 per person, that's just the crumbs they gave us while spewing trillions to their friends."
Bingo
The most recent government stimulus bill that included checks to everyone spent something on the order of $10k for every $1k it gave out.
Something like $6T or so.
$1400 per person but tell us about the fractional reserve process and how much "money" then actually flows into the economy?
$1400 is a BS number. Our system multiplies those $$$ 10x and then again to God only knows how big an amount.
No one knows how many dollars are in the world's economic system. People will try to claim M1 or M2 or some other such nonsense. It is magnitudes larger. Banks create almost all the "money".
And not just banks in the USA, but banks all over the world who make Eurodollar loans. Those are dollars too.
When this is all over, humans will never again use a fiat currency. The destructive forces are too great and the calamity too evil. Probably should just use gold again. It is the perfect money.
I hope when this is all over that Marxists the world over are hunted to extinction.
"It is hard to believe that $1400 per person will drive national inflation line we are seeing."
Only if you're numerically illiterate. Lowball it, take 200 million as the population that received 1400. You get 2 *10^8 * 1.4 * 10^3 = 280 billion. Now, there actually were MULTIPLE stimulus payments like this one, I think at least 3, so even lowballing it we are approaching a trillion alone in stimulus, which is a significant percentage of GDP. And there are multiplier effects. And you are also throwing this money straight into the hands of consumers. This allocates it straight in those areas of the economy that are most relevant to consumer prices. This has very plausibly contributed to the inflation we are seeing and it was caused by irresponsible democrats overspending, because multiples of the above amount were also allocated elsewhere in the economy.
Are you numerically literate, democrat? Do you think that math is trustworthy? Do you think you can make people believe in THE SCIENCE™ while denying the importance of numbers?
Increase the supply of money relative to the supply of goods and services it can buy, and the ratio of money to stuff changes because there's more money chasing the same stuff. So what happens? The money is now worth less, because it takes more of it to get the same stuff. It's pretty obvious, I think.
Where's your proof? It's a nice theory but shouldn't you have the numbers to back it up if it's so simple?
You've got a hundred coins chasing a hundred goodies. One coin gets one goodie. Government churns out 900 more coins. There's still only a hundred goodies. Are they still worth one coin each, or ten?
The proof is the inflation we are experiencing.
Annual inflation in Russia accelerated to 16.70% as of April 1, its highest since March 2015 and up from 15.66% a week earlier, the economy ministry said on Wednesday,
The fascist Russian govt didn't print more money and they're getting hammered with inflation because obviously it's not as simple you guys think it is. There are other factors affecting prices.
Annual inflation in Russia accelerated to 16.70% as of April 1
Hmm. Anything unusual going on with Russia at the moment?
Exactly my point.
Exactly my point.
That's curious, since your point seems to have been to offer up Russia as an example of a country that is experiencing high levels of inflation as a comparative explanation to show why US inflation is not tied to government spending.
Yet, Russia is currently in the middle of a war.
Seems not a great comparative example, no?
I don't recall massive inflation in the USA during any of their wars.
Historically, printing and devaluing currencies is one of the primary ways of funding wars. And it has routinely wrecked and bankrupted economies.
If the USA has managed to avoid massive inflation during wars it’s only been fairly recently. Since we tax way higher, we don’t have to print as much. And since we’ve achieved superpower and reserve currency status, we can fudge and pass off the costs.
And Biden and his cronies, for reasons unexplained to all, is trying to end our reserve currency status.
People do not appreciate how much that would fuck things up here.
Because during America’s wars the rest of the world wasn’t working to depress the shit out of the value of the dollar.
Russia’s inflation is so high because the ruble is collapsing.
Sadly, it is actually recovering. Something the dollar is unlikely to do.
No but there was massive inflation right after the wars ended. Look it up junior.
You have no real point. As usual you’re an apologist for destructive democrat policies. You don’t have even have any sense of self preservation. The problem is that you will drag us down with you. Therefore you need to stop. Or you will be stopped.
https://twitter.com/FiorellaIsabelM/status/1512104488651403269?t=dKQ1G2hTYT1RAqhFy4wR5w&s=19
The Russian Ruble is now at 75 to the dollar, a higher value than BEFORE the conflict began. This is working out quite well for the U.S isn’t it?
What enemies of liberty are purchasing the Russian Ruble?
Ah, Libertarian's on wall street.
Your plural s is as disjointed and forcefully tacked on as the rest of your thinking.
Try history. It's always been that way. You can study it for yourself.
See that's the difference between progressives and everyone else. We look at history and see something didn't work in the past and think "hmmm maybe we shouldn't do that". Progressives either ignore history, or come up with fancy new hypothesis that run contrary to all established historical trends, and say, 'it didn't work in the past because we didn't try hard enough'.
I've been saying it for years that the left feels that intentions trump results. Bad results from good intentions means someone with bad intentions fucked it up. It's just not possible for good intentions to have bad results. So they try harder and harder. That's how the road to hell is paved with good intentions.
I also think you're a fucking dumbass for accusing me of being a leftist in light of things I actually say about leftists.
I get what you're saying but I'm not sure you understand me. There are other factors contributing to price increases. It's not as simple as you make it out.
There are lots of factors leading to price increases. Prices are information. You don't need to know that a drought or shortage of workers resulted in less of something being produced, resulting in a higher price. You just know the price went up. You don't need to know why. That's how the market works.
But that's different from an inflated money supply chasing the same goods and services. It's basic math. Print more money relative to the same amount of stuff and it takes more money to buy the same stuff.
"Prices are information."
Ya, just like up and down is your only information when you are trying to determine the optimal path from New York to Paris.
Price inflation is often related to and affected by monetary inflation, though MANY additional factors impact price inflation. A shortage of goods, additional cost of links in the supply chain, rising labor costs, and additional regulations all negatively affect price inflation. On the other side of the equation, improved efficiency, cheaper materials, reduced regulations, or increased automation tend to drive prices down (though rarely enough to actually see price decreases).
In addition, thanks to the Petrodollar, we’re able to ‘export’ some of our inflation to other countries, who need to hold US dollars to buy oil. (Just imagine being one of those suckers being forced to hold a devaluing currency just because you want to buy stuff with it!!!) This, along with some good old-fashioned juking the stats, is why the rate of monetary inflation rarely matches the ‘end’ rate of price inflation.
In a way, monetary inflation provides a sort of ‘baseline’ price inflation rate to the economy. Think of it as a wave pool with variable settings. At a low rate of monetary inflation, it’s easy to move. The higher the rate, the more you have to ‘fight’ to move forward. Set the machine too high and you’ll be overcome. Monetary inflation is the ‘rising tide’ that lifts all prices.
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/inflation-and-you?s=w
Republicans look at history and ignore it. Seeing to do the greatest amount of damage possible.
Libertarians substitute idology for history.
And then there are the Libertarian propaganda groups who will do or say any lie as long as it adds to the profits and power of their corporate masters.
Try a basic economics book.
Great idea. Here's a great one.
https://fee.org/media/14946/economicsinonelesson.pdf
'Economics in One Lesson' by Henry Hazlitt. It's free even.
Jesus Christ, are leftists all uniformly economic illiterates?
We're talking about basic, basic supply-and-demand, kids-level economics here. This isn't even Econ 101. This is 5th grade social studies.
Yes.
One million Dead Americans agree.
Keeping people safe is unfair to the dead.
What?!?! I thought you "libertarians" thought schools taught bullshit and lies?!? NOW you are saying listen to what you were taught in school? Typical of hypocritical humans.
Economic lessons might be the biggest bullshit lies of all education.
I'm guessing Minadin went to a private school if economics was studied.
I learned econ years later. All I learned in public school was how to properly pack and smoke a bowl. It was nessasary medicine to get through the day.
Yes - I went to private school. K-12. Basic things like trade and markets being so integral to the motivation for cultural exchange / expansion and things like colonizing the new world were a critical part to our understanding of things like history, current events, world politics, exchange rates, etc.
We actually had classes where we (pretend) bought and traded stocks based on the current market rates and we were graded on how we performed. At age 12. 6th grade. By an actual (local) CEO who was teaching the class as a volunteer. It was like fantasy Football, only fantasy Wall Street. It turns out that competition is a great way to get kids to team up and try new things.
The proof is the 7.9%. Highest in 40 years. Our inflation being higher than our peers.
The whole world is suffering through a period of high inflation, but American policy makers added a uniquely high amount of fuel to the fire.
"Hey, if you don't like this then why did you cash your check?"
Because I paid my taxes directly from my bank account, and received my refund by direct deposit, I didn't get a 'check'. It was direct deposited. I got a 'letter'.
Never got a check or direct deposit.
I'm trying to find consumer spending numbers because that's the premise of the argument in this article. If you're arguing consumer spending drives inflation it's strange that those numbers aren't front and center in the article. Here's some of those numbers. We need 2020 and 2021.
U.S. consumer spending for 2019 was $14,544.60B, a 3.94% increase from 2018.
U.S. consumer spending for 2018 was $13,993.28B, a 4.89% increase from 2017.
U.S. consumer spending for 2017 was $13,340.35B, a 4.47% increase from 2016.
U.S. consumer spending for 2016 was $12,769.96B, a 3.84% increase from 2015.
Consumer Spending in 2018 and 2019 isn’t driving inflation today.
"Here's some of those numbers. We need 2020 and 2021"
Yes, you certainly do.
Say Shrike, what world changing event happened in 2020 and 2021 that might have radically altered that trajectory?
The stimulus checks were just to get us to sit down and shut up while the 'elites' raided the treasury.......again. Now we're predictably paying the price.
"Inflation in the U.S. hit an annualized rate of 7.9 percent in February (data for March will be released by the Bureau for Labor Statistics next week), a 40-year high. "
Remember that the government has changed the way it calculates CPI a couple times since 1980. If you calculate current inflation using the original method, it's actually over 15%--the highest it's been since World War One.
The term "Winter of Death" was swept under the rug faster than a Hunter Biden story.
Weird I've been reading a lot of Hunter Biden stories in the news lately
Yeah, now that the election is over and Bidens about to get thrown under the bus.
Odd, I haven't noticed anything here at Reason.
The “best” part of the stimulus is that it didn’t matter how rich you were. As long as your taxable income per your tax return was low enough, you qualified. I know of people with eight figure net worths who got stimulus payments.
Finally. Someone who understands the distinction between wealth and income. We need more people like you around here.
My net worth is higher than that, but I’m retired so my taxable income is (intentionally) low. I got every penny of all three payments. So did my wife. It’s ridiculous.
OK, so if dumping a trillion dollars into peoples' hands induced inflation (and if we, ahem, don't want inflation) then during the next pandemic CDC troops will instead confiscate goods from the wealthy and distribute them to the needy.
Problem solved!
It was a pure vote buying scheme. Biden even said, explicitly "Vote for Warnock and Ossoff and we'll give you $2,000." Despicable.
Then magically the $2,000 turned into $1,400.....weird.
Trump wanted the check around the time of the election to be $2000. McConnell said no, and basically only agreed to $600. McConnell was being the only adult in the room, but he was excoriated by everyone, Trumpers, Biden, progressives, the shitty media.
So Biden and the Democrats gave out $1400 to make the total $2000. They can’t act like they didn’t know there was inflation risk - McConnell told them very publicly.
And every Democrat including Biden.....
"I don't get it... What do you mean it's our fault... It can't be..."
Stupid is; Is stupid does.
Never-mind it's an act of National Socialism (syn; Nazism) and a direct violation to the U.S. Constitution.
How is stimulus spending "National Socialism"? LOL In Germany, during the Twenties through the mid-Forties of the 20th Century, a political party called NAZI urged nationalism for Germany, pairing it with the idea of creating an "ethnically pure" society of mythical beings they called Aryans. National. Society. Equals National Socialism.
Nazi Germany was a capitalist country by the way.
Barely. It was Byzantine bureaucracy, central planning, nationalization and market manipulation towards rearmament out the ying yang. And the supposed “privatizations” were party stooges doing exactly what the party wanted them to do. Market forces were kept to a minimum.
It’s wasn’t even as “capitalist” as Mussolini’s corporatism.
"Nazi Germany was a capitalist country" -- Awe; the propaganda spreads like wild fire.
Right there at the top of wiki, "The Nazi Party, officially the NATIONAL SOCIALIST German Workers Party"..... ?????capitalist???? Right.../s
Never-mind the term 'Nazi' is but an acronym for Nationalsozialistische in German translated to National Socialist. No, no; they must of been 'capitalists'??? /s How retarded can propaganda get?
Per Merrian-Webster: Socialism is any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership .... for the distribution of good.
When a government STEALS from it's people to ??Stimulus-Spend??? They are "advocating collective" and government ownership of goods and the distribution of it. Just because it's median is the USD doesn't void it of what it is.
Welcome to reasonable thinking 101.
The problem you have here is your relying too much on the name. While the Nazi's name implied socialism, that was not their economic philosophy. The economic system was fascism defined by Webster as;
"a political philosophy, movement, or regime that exalts nation and often race above the individual and that stands for a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, severe economic and social regimentation, and forcible suppression of opposition."
This is the worst system where you have a government directed capitalism. Allowing wealth to still rise to the top with no benefit to the middle and lower classes.
"...where you have a government directed capitalism..."
Like socialism?
No, in Germany the government did not own the industries it simple directed them. People who own the industries still made money, while Germany had money.
Oh, that makes it all better.
They didn't own it, they just controlled it. Completely different socialism.
You know that socialism wasn't the big problem with the Nazis, right?
Tony Paraphrased, "They just weren't doing Nazism the right way..."
Could Denial-ism and Stupidity get any thicker?
I know Tony; Why don't you move your sorry *ss over there and show them how to fix it. You certainly have no business re-defining the USA and at a political level it's treasonous.
I think however the Nazis did things was the right Nazi way, since they invented it.
But the big issue that the world has with the Nazis was not their generous social welfare program.
The heck if it wasn't Tony... Their generous welfare program is exactly why they were going bankrupt on welfare recipients but instead of just accepting blame for their idiocy started gassing their 'less than' society....
Tony; You and your ilk are models of the Nazi's with their stupidity, their stubborn ignorance and topped off with their denial-ism and arrogance.
And no; The Nazi's didn't invent National Socialism - society shortened the term to Nazi (the syn) just like brb for be right back and a million other shortened terms... But you'll just keep projecting and playing stupid and ignorant JUST like the German Nazi-supporters did....
Wow did you major in history.
"stands for a ***centralized autocratic government*** headed by a dictatorial leader, severe ***economic and social regimentation***, and forcible suppression of opposition"
Funny; I didn't read anything there about "Capitalism". No mention of private ownership of the means of production or about voluntary exchange or about free-markets....
They really weren’t capitalists. It was a socialistic system. Just admit it. Nazis are of you. As it is a leftist construct and fascism is another basta4d child of Marx.
You're calling all your political opponents Nazis and pedophiles. Didn't leave yourself much of a runway, did you?
I suppose cannibalism is next. But what then? I think the Republican party shot its wad on going full retard, what do you think?
I don’t think you’re a Nazi. You are definitely more of a Leninist. A stupid one. A stupid, imbecilic one. As far as going full retard, well, you are the expert here. Probably also on receiving loads.
Actually no Tony... Many Democrats call themselves Nazi's every-time they proudly announce they support or are members of the Socialist Party/Ideology... And then there is those who aren't quite so proud and just pass/vote-for every socialist/communist UN-Constitutional (against there very sworn oath of office) bill they can create and or their party massively pitches.
Course if you wasn't such a party whorshipper; you could actually make many cases against the Republicans (RHINO'S) but your too busy playing [WE] gang affiliation Power-Mad games as the entire Democratic Party worships at it's very foundation. "Who-ever gets the most guns wins the Nazi-Regime!!!", the left touts over and over and over again.
...because we should have made Americans go hungry just so some numbers would look cool and stuff.
Maybe they wouldn’t be threatened by hunger if they weren’t forced into lockdowns and shutdowns?
Godron Hilgers, "Sell your Individual souls to the [WE] foundation; because you don't own You, [WE] own you.........."
Please leave the USA; you do not belong here. Please move to the CCP-China as that is your utopian dream. Surely; a plane ticket is easier to obtain on toppling an entire nation.
Loose spending loot among the plebians always triggers inflation. There was a stampede of greedy dastards to see how much of that loot could be stolen, and steal they did. Price at the pumps, groceries, rents, and now Long John Silver has downsized...shrunk his chicken planks into tidbits, mere nuggets! Downsizers ought to be the first dastards dragged before a firing squad.
LJS seems to be a pretty "plebian" eatery. Not criticizing LJS at all. As for the recent inflationary trend, it seems to me that I got my final one about one year ago. Sure took a long time for my apparently "profligate" spending to mess up the economy of the entire world....
Rent increases are the worst! Landlords, especially single family home or duplex owners, raise rents just because...inflation. It's sick.
The USD dollar is collapsing... Not just for renters but landlords also. Idiots ignored the USA (U.S. Constitution) and built a Nazi-Regime of which has a historical record of massive self-destruction.
And by 'historical' it wasn't but a decade ago Venezuela crashed.
What an opportunity for MORE people to do better......
Funny how there is this narrative that THOSE people owe me because THOSE people did something worth-while.
One million Dead Americans agree.
Keeping people safe is unfair to the dead.
Sure, sure; because pointing Gov-Guns at people keeps them safe... /s..... I just robbed that bank because I was protecting it in case someone else robbed it. Stupid, crazy, crazy stupid.
Yeah. Stimulus checks to poor people jacked up inflation. But not the FAR bigger amounts pumped out to corporations and rich people which promptly inflated the stock market.
I find it a little hilarious that some people expect the United States (or any country for that matter) to sail through a two-year+ societal disaster and suffer no consequences at all.
It's even more hilarious that the article here states that four (4) economists who work for the Federal Reserve said the stimulus is what caused inflation.
I looked up the total number of economists who work on the Federal Reserve Board and found that there is another 396 economists who still haven't weighed in on a manufactured debate concocted by people whose entire stock in trade is the idea that any form of social welfare cannot work because it disrupts the tiny little supply and demand signals that are far more important to them than human life...
Ok Tony.
The US was also one of the hardest-hit countries in the world during the worst of the pandemic. I wonder: How much did self-interest and anti-authority attitudes contribute to the death toll?
Now, we're seeing commercial interests cashing in after a long period of pandemic-induced commercial stagnation...but hey, dudes...it's the stimulus! LOL
Funny; I didn't know that COVID grew legs and the authority to shut-down the commercial sector... For some reason I thought it was the Nazi-Regime...... What's next?? Something about guns growing legs and shooting all by themselves???
You are close, in that inflation is mostly bullshit to cover up, I mean explain, economic bullshit lies.
Did the USD catch the COVID disease tooo???? /s
I'm surprised it didn't catch the 'common cold' disease too.
Spending money that is not balanced by raised revenues always causes inflation. When the government gave trillions of dollars to billionaires, that increased inflation, no matter what was the level of spending. When they did it at the same time they were increasing spending, that increased inflation more. We would not have the inflation but for the enormous governmental gifts to the rich and to the wealthy corporations. Get the money back that we gave them, and inflation will come to a halt.
That we allow the largest corporations to greatly raise prices at the same time that they are gathering the highest profits in history at the same time they are paying close to zero in taxes is economic madness that cannot be sustained. That does not mean I advocate price controls. I advocate fair taxes on profits, structured so that the taxes are less when corporate money is spent on wages and improvements, and more when it is spent on luxury yachts and stock buybacks. That adjustment will correct the price rises, and thus the inflation.
Well Said --- Money is nothing but a 'fiat' median of human resources and human labor..... Taking money not *EARNED* creates SLAVE LABOR... Those that *EARNED* end up getting nothing for their labor in return.
Least libertarian statement of the day, "When the government gave trillions of dollars to billionaires"
Congratulations maybe you should get a job at Reason. People earn their money the government TAKES it by taxation.
Who is "them"? Do you mean the fat rich cigar smoking white guy or do you mean the shareholders who are already double taxed? Also, stock buybacks are another form of dividend that rewards risk. The truth is its time for the AFL-CIO to start paying their fair share. Dems just passed 1.5 trillion in union graft in case you didn't notice.
Through much if not all of the pandemic, Reason was cautious and skeptical about the amount of money that was being given out. I agreed with that sentiment. There was a need to help those affected but the money was given out to far too many. The results are now obvious. What is less obvious is the solution which in reality is to ride out the problem and let the economy settle back into a steady state. I don't see any real quick fix. Question is how to address this in an election year. Will any politician rise to say we have to be patient until the money is once again out of the system? I am guessing no.
"There was a need to help those affected" --- So you seem to think politicians went out in there free time and helped people???? What a diluted mind you have. They didn't help anyone -- they shoved Gov-Guns in their faces; dictated them and STOLE their LABOR, USD's and Money (i.e. Taxation & Inflation)....
This is what's wrong with you leftards: You worship the almighty government like it was a GOD... "But Mom; How did Jesus turn the water to whine..." -------- "Never-mind that son; The almighty Government does amazing miracles like pops refined human resources from the sky...."
Bow down and worship those almighty Gov-God's packing Guns.
People wouldn’t have needed the money of not for your democrats shutting everything down for months and months. Even now your fellow travelers oppress millions of Americans across this country.
Captain Obvious article of the day. Printing money out of thin air causes inflation, no kidding.
You missed the obvious part of this article. The pandemic was going to necessitate government spending. The article acknowledges that fact. Inflation is due to the poor way in which the pandemic money was used. Rather than targeting needs and problems it was broadly disbursed. We don't need politicians to spend more or spend less, but rather to spend only what is needed and optimized to address the problem.
Gov't spending =/= expanding the amount of US money printed by 43%.
Rather than targeting needs and problems it was broadly disbursed.
Ya know like MASSIVE lock-downs, Production Shut-downs and Gov-Guns threats EVEN after a simple VAX-shot would 'cure' any lethal concern.....
It's just so fun watching you make Postmortem excuses.....
More targeted spending means more government meddling in private affairs, which is not zero efficiency cost.
The people who didn't use stimulus money to cover basic expenses did things like save and invest in cryptocurrency. Not a maximally desirable outcome, but if we can't tolerate a little extra cash in the hands of the plebes, then what are we doing here? Even if we did a budget-neutral redistribution by taxing the rich, demand will increase in the same way (as well as interest in crypto flim-flam).
The problem is the global supply chain hasn't been able to keep up with American demand while keeping prices what they were in 2019. I'm not even sure what we're talking about is a crisis.
Tony maintains a fact-free diet.
Giving money to broadly is a problem. There was no need to do a lot of government meddling because the mechanism already existed in the unemployment compensation program. Support those out of work because of the pandemic, not everyone who is working or retired (like me).
You are correct the issue of inflation is not too much money alone and supply chain is part of the issue.
The original source for this information is “Duh” magazine.
Yes, the alternate history is one in which businesses closed, people didn't work, and they also didn't have stimmy checks. And the cost is, accepting the premise of this article, a negligible inflation differential compared to the Eurozone, or a couple points when compared to a couple specific OECD countries.
If that weren't coupled with higher prices caused by supply shortages (and some very real and admitted-to gouging), would we even notice it as a problem?
Is a policy that prevents a depression at the cost of mild extra inflation for a year a bad thing because it wasn't absolutely free of cost?
I suppose it all depends on whether you care about the well-being of humans or whether you care about confirming a zombielike dogma that government just can't do anything right. We all make moral choices.
Partisan hack excuses mistakes made by the president from his party. Price gouging, lol. We’ve had low inflation for 20 years but now after all this time those greedy businesses decided it was time to Jack prices through the room. Makes sense if it fits your narrative.
There was a pandemic when the whole world shut down for months. I've seen the price increases in my own industry, and you can follow the causal chain all the way back to some factory on the other side of the world, if you like.
You guys aren't even managing to incorporate Econ 101 into your analysis, which apparently, at this point, entirely consists of "fuck Joe Brandon."
"Shut down" does articulate the government boots involved in the response, yes.
Government orders have been repeatedly linked at you illustrating the point that closure was jot voluntary, if you want to pull your head out of the DNC's ass to check the weather sometime.
Economics 101. Let’s see….more money chasing fewer goods = oh, yeah, higher prices.
I’m not doing “fuck Joe Biden”. He’s an idiot but that’s just an observation. Remember, Trump also wanted the second payment to be $2000, but McConnell limited it to $600 because he was worried about inflation. You’ll never admit it, but McConnell was right.
He saved Trump from fucking things up, but he wasn’t in a position to keep Biden from Trump’s fuck up.
And then, just to demonstrate his total cluelessness, Biden tried to insist that dumping yet another $3 trillion out there in the form of BBB would somehow magically lower inflation. He and his administration are clueless, regardless of what one thinks about trump.
Q Tony, you’re not capable of having this discussion. Go back to your windowless bars and drink your appletinis.
No, tony, an “alternate history” would be one in which businesses were not closed, people were free to work, and paranoid little bitches were free to hide in their houses.
Things would have been better for a lot of people if there had no pandemic. But this isn't pretty pants kindergarten, it's real life.
You people are going to absolutely hate libertopia if you can't deal with even the most minor of impositions from nature and society. Cry about masks too while you're at it.
Much easier to get rid of you Marxists. You leftists are going to hate it if you can’t learn to live on peace with Americans.
We outnumber you redneck freaks.
Not in Norman.
By any chance, do you have any thoughts on the guy calling for the government-imposed systematic extermination of his political opponents?
I always thought it was absolutely wonderful how Walmart and Home Depot combined economic forces to give the federal government an alternative by offering to send every citizen a $1,400 check to help stimulate business.
Wasn't that just awesome?
I can't stop laughing, and then I remember this guy is the President.
https://www.thefirsttv.com/biden-america-can-be-defined-in-a-single-word-the-foothills-of-the-himalayas/
You mean to say that America can't be defined by the word, "possibilities", right?
Nice to know.
It took many possibilities before we collected that anecdote.
Boehm....Just remember, you personally voted for this shit. People like you are why we have stunningly high inflation. This is on you for voting for that dolt in 1600.
Stay safe everyone. essay
When there’s too many dollars chasing not enough goods, the government knows just what it do: start chasing those goods with more dollars.
Until that day; dollars means nothing then the Gov-Guns will show their ugly heads; as they've been doing behind covers for quite a while. It's the 'utopian' dream to run gang-land style politics for those that worship the government or think 'gov-guns' are the answer to all their quirks.
It's more about making sure people don't lose their houses or go hungry.
One negative metric resulting from emergency economic policy is not the sum total of effects of that policy. It's just the one you cherry pick as evidence for your political agenda.
It will be interesting to see an author at Reason tackle this report from economists at the Federal Reserve of San Francisco. Boehm discussed a report analyzing the effect of the stimulus payments on inflation, seeming to trust in how that analysis attributes to them some of the difference in inflation the U.S. has seen compared to other OECD countries. What will they do now with an analysis of "what did in fact happen" that shows little difference in unemployment figures between states that ended the extra unemployment benefits early and those that let them run through to their full expiration?
"Our findings can be interpreted in various ways. We find that the UI withdrawals had limited direct impacts on hiring rates, which suggests the enhanced UI benefits were not an important source of labor shortages in 2021. On the other hand, the termination of UI benefits did not undermine labor market conditions in the states that cut benefits. Nonetheless, studies of past UI benefit expansions suggest that many individuals who lose benefits are more likely to be forced to reduce consumption and suffer substantial hardship (Rothstein and Valletta 2017). As Holzer et al. (2021) emphasize, such tradeoffs are important considerations for designing and assessing UI policy changes."
What about the money the federal reserve printed to buy debt from corporations and Walstreet and the bonds sold backed by tax payer money. Of course the federal reserve is blaming help to the people to cover up the real reason for inflation corporate welfare.
Libertarian CLOWN author of the article implies that giving rescue money to people caused them to eat more food. Demand is not the issue. The problem is lack of production.
SHORTAGES of key goods and services, most often energy and food.
The shortages all are COVID-related.
Today’s inflation involves many such shortages including oil, food, computer chips, lumber, shipping, labor, and other commodities.
Historically, there has NEVER been a relationship between federal deficit spending and inflation.
Deficit spending can cure inflation if it cures shortages by obtaining and distributing scarce commodities.
The lack of federal deficit spending ALWAYS results in recessions and depressions.
Hey dumb fuck, the current increases in prices (inflations) are caused by SHORTAGES of key goods and services, most often energy and food.