Biden Tries To Twist His Domestic Agenda Into a Form Joe Manchin Will Support
Biden made some vague promises about deficit reduction during Tuesday's State of the Union address. They don't add up.

During his first year in office, President Joe Biden tried and failed to get Sen. Joe Manchin (D–W.Va.) and other moderate Democrats in the Senate on board with his expensive domestic agenda.
In Year Two, Biden is promising to market that agenda in a way that seems carefully calibrated to appeal to the objections Manchin had raised about how Biden's plans would add to America's record-high national debt and trillion-dollar annual deficit.
"My plan will not only lower costs to give families a fair shot; it will lower the deficit," Biden said during Tuesday's State of the Union address.
A fine thesis—a welcome one, even—but Biden declined to fill in many details about how he intends to do that. The only specific plan announced on Tuesday was a new office within the Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute waste, fraud, and abuse within the pandemic relief bills passed over the past two years—bills that, in fairness, were wracked by waste, fraud, and abuse.
Other than that, Biden's domestic agenda sounds about the same as it did last year: Protectionist "Buy American" provisions, a bigger social safety net including tax credits for parents, and a crackdown on the businesses that Democrats increasingly (and bizarrely) are trying to scapegoat for runaway inflation.
Going after waste is laudable, of course, if perhaps two years too late. But the fundamental drivers of the federal budget deficit are a structural disconnect between spending and revenue and unstable long-term costs in entitlement programs. A promise to reduce the deficit that doesn't address those two things isn't a serious plan.
Biden's plan doesn't appear to be a serious plan.
As he made clear a few moments later, promising that "by the end of this year, the deficit will be down to less than half what it was before I took office," and following up by claiming that he would be "the only president ever to cut the deficit by more than one trillion dollars in a single year."
That's a clever little game. Thanks to pandemic spending, the federal budget deficit ballooned to over $3 trillion during 2020 and rang in at $2.8 trillion last year. As the pandemic passes and all that emergency spending comes off the books, the deficit is projected to fall to about $1.1 trillion this year before leveling off and then rising again:

That decline is not the result of anything Biden is proposing to do—and it doesn't mean that the underlying problems with the federal budget have been addressed.
Biden is setting the lowest possible goal for deficit reduction, setting himself up to take credit for achieving it, and hoping that's enough to convince moderate Democrats to vote for more spending.
Because that's absolutely the other shoe here. Biden's "Build Back Better" plan died in the Senate last year because Manchin and other moderate Democrats refused to vote for more spending. Manchin was very explicit about this: "This is a recipe for an economic crisis," he said of Biden's plan in November.
Even after the White House tried to reconfigure the package to hide half its actual cost, Manchin correctly derided it for being full of "shell games" and "budget gimmicks."
So Biden is promising to change the shells and announce new gimmicks, this time gift-wrapped specifically for Manchin. But this isn't deficit reduction; it's just more of the same.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
How dumb do you have to be to ignore every failure he's had over the last year, hear him to a dumb speech, and think... yeah, this guy
OR - - - -
How dumb do you have to think the voters are to give the democrats even a fortified chance in November?
Never forget that, with their incredible media privilege, there is nothing the democrats can't blame on the republicans.
A few in SF were in meltdown over the evil Republican plot to recall those school board members.... in San Francisco... where 6% are Republican, and there isn't an elected Republican anywhere.
Coming up, "REALLY" is was the GOP that wanted to defund the police! And mask kids! and .......
I mean it worked for the civil rights act. Democrats hated that then and they hate it now, but they still take credit for it
The Civil Rights act was signed into law by a democrat. The 64 GOP presidential nominee opposed it. Storm Thurmond left the Dems and joined the GOP because of it.
The Dems that opposed it were mostly conservative southerners. Today conservative southerners overwhelmingly vote GOP.
Fuck the south.
The Civil Rights act was signed into law by a democrat.
So what. Many of them were in the KKK.
Congratulations, you named the *one* GOP member who switched parties over the CRA. If not for the overwhelming support of the GOP, it would not have passed.
The dems that opposed it were for racist reasons. The GOP that did were for principled reasons. There's no reason the CRA should apply to private life, only to government, and it wouldn't be needed in the 14th amendment was interpreted correctly
The myth of the party switch is the big lie. Even right now, dems are against the CRA, believing it's OK and GOOD to discriminate based on sex and race. Your own president explicitly did that when picking his VP and his SC nominee
[JOIN NOW] I am making a real GOOD MONEY ($200 to $300 / hr.) online from my laptop. Last month I got cheek of nearly 50,000$. this online work is simple and straightforward. Don’t have to go office, Its home online job. iou You become independent after joining this job. I really thanks to my friend who refer me this:-
..
SITE….., http://moneystar33.blogspot.com/
Fuck off racist.
I don’t know, I don’t think it’s that much dumber/mentally ill, than voting for Biden in the first place, after a lifetime of his “accomplishments”.
Modern Democrats believe that spending money magically solves problems, including inflation, rather than causes them It's basically the whole premise of their party these days.
Republicans know better, but spend money anyway.
We need to spend more money that we don’t have to bring down prices.
SleepyJoe
Democrats believe no such thing. They fully understand the problems that it causes, but it's really the only thing besides fear that gets them elected. Buying votes with cash, promises of cash or fear of the cash stopping have bought many votes.
Republicans know better but also think they must play along to an extent or risk being bought out of the race. Some simply don't give a damn.
Somebody said something - - - - - -
“In Year Two, Biden is promising…”
It really doesn’t matter what the promises are, they will be incompetently executed deckchair repositioning by a staff of puerile Dunning-Krueger afflicted poxy motherfuckers. Fuck them all.
After over two years of Congress slinging around money for pandemic stimulus, Biden is now forming an entirely new task force to investigate all the people who wasted American money. Unfortunately, this didn't involve locking the doors and arresting all the Congressmen, but you can be sure that if you checked the wrong box on a stimulus request, you're going to be in deep trouble-especially if you're a smaller business competitor going against major corporate entities.
Biden also promised a $15 minimum wage across the whole that is going to make everything cheaper and also he's going to make childcare cheaper somehow. And he's going to make things cheaper by forcing people to buy American while paying Americans extra money by raising the minimum wage. And when costs (inevitably) go up he's going to go after big businesses that raise their prices and punish them if they cut jobs.
His whole speech about he's got free unicorns to hand out to people.
"I've just a had a brilliant idea: I'm going to end cancer." I wonder why nobody thought of doing that already.
Also taking care of the troops!
Third, we need to support our veterans! Like, damn, how have we not been doing this already, right? They come home from war and they aren’t the same. Who would subject these young Americans to the horrors of war? Only a disgusting warmongering politician. Like Putin.
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/the-stank-of-the-union-is-strong
We spend a fuck-ton on the VA. The problem isn't the funding, it's the inefficiency and the lack of proper incentives.
Also, what did Fuck Brandon mean at the end when he said, "Go Get Him?" Who was he talking to, the troops? Who are we getting?
That was super disturbing. Was he talking to the troops that he just said weren't going to war?
The first step in ending cancer is understanding that there are over 100 kinds of cancer you don't simply end all cancer. But I suppose if they make the usual advancements in one form of cancer, he can claim progress, even if the progress is at the end of 30 years of research.
Stupid old man.
Go get him!
Fuck Joe and the Ho.
More lies, as per usual. His lips must be moving.