Voters Around the World Are Cooling on Populists, Gravitating Toward Technocrats
Plus: A very blunt Senate candidate, bad news for business mergers, and more...

The populist wave that swept the world in recent years shows signs of crashing. But don't expect good things to take its place.
Faith in illiberal, "populist" strongmen may be declining. But this doesn't correspond with growing respect for liberal democracy. In countries around the world, support for democracy is waning. And declining faith in democracy was especially potent in the U.S., where the share of people who say democracy is a "bad" system of governance went from 10.5 percent in 2019 to 25.8 percent in 2021.
These findings come from a new mega-study of global attitudes and politics. Looking at survey data from 169 countries, researchers with the University of Cambridge's Centre for the Future of Democracy found public opinion around populist politics has been shifting since the second quarter of 2020. This shift saw populist leaders around the world lose an average of 10 percentage points in popularity between then and the end of 2021. "There is strong evidence that the pandemic has severely blunted the rise of populism," lead study author Robert Foa said.
Populism—"a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups," according to the Oxford English Dictionary—sounds pretty good on the surface. But in practice, it has meant many authoritarian, redistributionist, and nativist ideas, embraced by candidates and parties with disdain for liberal democratic values. In recent years the term populism has been used—not always, but often—almost synonymously with nationalism.
"From [Recep Tayyip] Erdogan and [Jair] Bolsonaro to the 'strong men' of Eastern Europe, the planet has experienced a wave of political populism," said Foa. "Covid-19 may have caused that wave to crest."
That's good news from a classical liberal perspective. But the study portends bad news for these liberal democracies overall. Because it also uncovered evidence that this sort of populism is being replaced by increasing trust in technocratic government.
The idea that experts should make decisions "according to what they think best for the country" rose 8 points in the U.S. and 14 points in the U.S. Meanwhile, in almost every country studied, people grew less likely to agree with the statement that the "will of the people" should be obeyed.
Sadly, it appears too much to ask that trying times lead to a rejection of both authoritarian strongmen and trust-the-experts style faith in mainstream politicians.
Over the course of the pandemic, the approval rating for mainstream politicians has fared much better than for more populist leaders and parties.
The researcher speculated several reasons why populist movements have faltered—not all of them reassuring. One theory is that COVID-19 induced immigration restrictions and trade barriers became a norm, accomplishing one of the professed goals of many populist parties and politicians.

Another scary finding from the study is that the pandemic produced some new avenues for illiberalism to frolic. For instance, large percentages of respondents in a number of countries said certain sorts of online discussions around COVID-19 should be banned. In the U.S., more than 25 percent supported policies to "stop rumors about the virus online."
And, overall, support for liberalism seems to be diminishing. The Cambridge report describes it as a "disturbing erosion of support for core democratic beliefs and principles, including less liberal attitudes with respect to basic civil rights and liberties and weaker preference for democratic government."
Within democracies, support for democracy is at its lowest point in 26 years.

The recent decline has been most marked among young people. "Younger survey respondents are disproportionately responsible for the illiberal value shift—with a much larger change among respondents aged below 35 than those aged 55 and above," notes the Cambridge report:
While the 'values gap' between the age groups was widening very slowly over the two decades prior to the pandemic, since its start in early 2020 those aged 18-35 have been the most likely to switch towards saying that it would be good to have a 'strong leader, who doesn't have to bother with parliament and elections' and that having a 'democratic political system' is a 'bad' way to run the country.
Interestingly, countries other than the U.S. seem to have come together more in COVID times. In most democracies, the proportion of people saying they strongly dislike those who vote for opposing parties and politicians was down. But in the U.S.—where the highest percentage of respondents were likely to say this anyway—the needle has barely moved.

You can find the full report, which goes into great detail about the findings, here.
FREE MINDS
https://twitter.com/GaryChambersJr/status/1483424500712673283
FREE MARKETS
The "antitrust" crusade against free markets continues. One key plank of Democratic lawmakers' agenda has been blocking more business mergers. Now, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) say they "are soliciting public input on ways to modernize federal merger guidelines to better detect and prevent illegal, anticompetitive deals in today's modern markets." As it stands, antitrust laws say the FTC and DOJ can stop mergers that substantially diminish competition or create a monopoly in that industry. Many in Congress and in the Biden administration have been pushing to "modernize" merger guidelines so that moves currently fine will be defined as illegally anticompetitive. Among other things, this includes saying that many merging businesses must prove that they're not anticompetitive (instead of putting the burden on the government to prove that they are).
https://twitter.com/aurelienportues/status/1483505969623707648
QUICK HITS
• The Postal Service will begin sending out COVID-19 tests:
????NEW—all households in the U.S. can order one set of 4 free at-home tests from the US Postal Service.
•Limit of one order per address
•One order includes 4 individual rapid antigen #COVID19 tests
•Ships starting in late JanuaryORDER FREE ????https://t.co/AJ0p0mpW11 pic.twitter.com/dLtx3NOWox
— Eric Feigl-Ding (@DrEricDing) January 18, 2022
• New York Attorney General Letitia James said an investigation has "uncovered significant evidence indicating that the Trump Organization used fraudulent and misleading asset valuations on multiple properties to obtain economic benefits, including loans, insurance coverage, and tax deductions for years."
• The Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday in a religious freedom case out of Boston, where the city has refused to fly a Christian flag at city hall despite flying many other kinds of flags there.
• Wait, so the federal government has just been hoarding N95 masks all this time?
• Jay-Z is calling on the DOJ to investigate Kansas City cops.
• The conservative case for philosophical liberalism.
• D.C. now requires proof of vaccination to do things like eat indoors and go to gyms.
• "Omicron is being used as a catch-all excuse for policy changes," says Matt Shapiro.
• Freddie deBoer tackles the progressive embrace of magic words and how "not everything is eugenics."
- Dispatches from the inaugural Hereticon conference, an event devoted to open-minded debate of controversial ideas and opinions.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Ahh, the Karening of the world continues.
Fuck Joe Biden
Fuck Joe Biden
Work At Home For USA ]My buddy's aunt makes $51/hr. on the computer. She has been unemployed for eight months but last month her but pay check was $18001 just working on the computer for a few hours. Check The Details HERE:- >>>>> CLICK HERE
Fuck Joe Biden!
Fuck Karen!
Fuck Be Unto Karen Biden! (Whoever that is!)
Fuck Joe Biden and fuck KarENB.
Redistribucrats and Restrictocrats
Why even have a government if if can't fuck with people?
Those should be in the dictionary.
Spot on.
A real "Both Sides."
"A pox on both their houses!" Oh wait...
Belgium admits link to Moderna vaccine and myocarsditis. Recommends no Moderna vaccine for those under 31.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/belgium-no-longer-recommending-moderna-vaccine-for-those-under-31-due-to-risk-of-heart-inflamation
Just wait 'til the young people discover that most COVID policies were designed to screw them for the benefit of fat seniors.
Considering that’s misinformation, most will probably never realize that.
Considering the odds of that are still less than the chances of getting myocarditis when you get covid, it seems pretty safe all the same.
Or just get Pfizer, etc.
A big "nothingburger" as you people like to say.
Lol
Considering the odds of that are still less than the chances of getting myocarditis when you get covid, it seems pretty safe all the same.
This is provably false for this demographic as a whole, and for males in this demographic it applies to BNT as well (not on this page, but I've seen the sex breakouts elsewhere and it's not close).
There's a lot of otherwise mainstream pediatricians associated with our hospitals that are simply recommending non-vaccination based on this factor alone. Which is a problem unless you actually like the idea of a caste system.
Which is a problem unless you actually like the idea of a caste system.
*Sighs sadly*
Vaccination is the new state religion.
Vaccination is a sacrament of the new religion.
Nice!
I got Covid and the chance of me getting myocarditis from it is zero.
Yeah, if you are comparing risk from vaccine and infection you need to consider a number of factors and not just assume uniform risk and assume that no one has been exposed to the virus. As you mention, many, many people already had covid and didn't get myocarditis and so are very unlikely to in the future. You also need to consider that if you get the vaccine you are definitely exposed to the risk caused by the vaccine. Some people just won't get covid for one reason or another.
"The conservative case for philosophical liberalism."
Wow, whole piece on the evil of Trump and, as usual, a non-delve into WHY Trump got elected.
American "conservatism" lost its luster when its voters realized the
"leaders" HATED them and did not believe a word they were saying. So, fuck the lot of 'em.
This is CNN.
Gorsuch’s choice not to mask up was an act of the same variety as men who “manspread” on the subway by sitting with their legs apart so there isn’t legroom for the person next to them or use “bro language” like referring to their sexual exploits in the workplace.
Stanford researchers also recently found that men who refuse to comply with Covid rules such as mask wearing are also more likely to commit sexual harassment and have sexist views.
No comment on the Cuomo.
What about Don Lemon? Matt Lauer? Charlie Rose? Al Franken?
Stanford researchers also recently found that men who refuse to comply with Covid rules such as mask wearing are also more likely to commit sexual harassment and have sexist views.
Amazing! Nothing about facial hair or tattoos?
No comment on the fact that Roberts apparently did not request justices to wear a mask, not did Sotomayor. She is simply, like many grievance feminists and progressives, unable to cope with potential risk in a mature capacity. This may go some way in explaining her string of lies and incorrect views about covid.
Someone should ask her the percentage of people that get Covid die from it.
She is just starting to accept that she is old and not long for this world.
"Stanford researchers also recently found that men who refuse to comply with Covid rules such as mask wearing are also more likely to commit sexual harassment and have sexist views."
The Science!
Just showing your naked face should be a sex crime.
Wait, I thought all persons with XY chromosomes that do not publicly neuter themselves are guilty of sexism and harassment.
I’m sure the study is legit.
found that men who refuse to comply with Covid rules such as mask wearing are also more likely to
... be unvaccinated black men. But they didn't want to say that!
men who “manspread”
Manspreading was a term coined by a woman of course. I had this conversation with a woman friend who complained about how men always sit with their legs apart. I said, you realize there is a piece of anatomy between those thighs that needs some room of its own. She just looked at me like, Women don't have that problem so you shouldn't either.
She probably swaddles her child so the poor kid can't experience any of life until she lets it.
Gorsuch’s choice not to mask up was an act of the same variety as men who “manspread” on the subway by sitting with their legs apart so there isn’t legroom for the person next to them or use “bro language” like referring to their sexual exploits in the workplace.
What about us "Bros" who believe in and have things like individually-owned automobiles, so they can "Manspread,' not wear masks, social distance accross 7 Continents via ferry boat if they so choose, and talk shit about sex as much as they God damn well please?
that is called 'being toxic'
except for of course by all the women throughout history who like such a man. Those aren't to be discussed of course.
Honestly, most feminist women make huge exceptions for anyone they think is hot. These rules are for low-status men only. "Toxic" means "I don't want to fuck you."
accurate
Good thing us MGTOW Pansexuals pack reserve chutes, so to speak.
As for the women of which you speak, both Feminist and Traditionalists, the words of Little Feat ring so true:
Little Feat--On Your Way Down
https://youtu.be/PE5Ve0y0m1Y
Yeah, if you look at what they do rather than what they say, most women still seem to want a traditionally manly man. And want to make him sandwiches.
I've never cared whether a woman could make me a sandwich. I'm a great cook in my own right and if there was another man in the mix, we could both make her a sandwich. 🙂
So by CNN's opinion profiling in other words is totally cool to do?
https://notthebee.com/article/npr-is-fake-news-npr-publishes-bogus-story-about-neil-gorsuch-refusing-to-wear-a-mask-after-request-from-sotomayor
"Reporting that Justice Sotomayor asked Justice Gorsuch to wear a mask surprised us. It is false. While we may sometimes disagree about the law, we are warm colleagues and friends."
Just as Joy Reid and the race grifters can take literally any incident and find out how muh racism happened, these grievance studies junkies all do the same with their preferred victim field.
Im surprised she didnt arrive at "he's probably raped 10 women"
The Postal Service will begin sending out COVID-19 tests
, continuing the confused guidance from the government, this time about how to obtain tests.
I'm sure that 1.2 masks per person will finally defeat covid for good!
Wow this was supposed to be way down the page, my bad :/
Fits here well enough.
Where else but the post office would a citizen go for medical equipment?
Can't go to CVS because Daddy Gov bought all the tests...
See how vital the post office is?
or banking services
Is Fist OK?
Maybe he couldn't provide proof of vaccination.
I had to dig around for my vaccine passport before I could post to Reason.
Wanna borrow mine?
Can’t we just print one off the dark web?
Insurrectionist!
Alex Rubinstein
@RealAlexRubi
Insane survey of Democratic voters in a recently poll:
-55% support fines against unvaxxed
-59% support house arrest
-48% support prison for questioning vax efficacy on social media
-45% support internment camps
-47% support surveillance
-29% support the state taking their kids
But conservatives say Let's Go Brandon. So really noth sides are bad.
Brandon is hateful language. You know as well as anyone that language is literal violence, but willfully trudge on with that kind of violent activity.
Izzat chu , Rev. Artie? 😉
I can just see him saying that, followed by a *Sniff!* from his upward-raised nose and flourish of his cape. 🙂
It cannot be overstated how differently professed Democrats have aligned themselves compared to Independents and Republicans. This isn't a both sides thing. Both sides may have problems, but they are not the same problems.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5GiuWJqYJg
You cannot look at those survey results and say "Both Sides!" It is self-identifying democrats, and they alone, who overwhelmingly support censorship of "False Info" by both the government and tech companies. While independents and republicans saw the abuses of federal agencies over the past 10 years and now majority disfavor them, Democrats majority favor the FBI, CIA, CDC and the FDA.
Get this: Over the years of the pandemic, Democrat support of the FDA- those fucking clowns keeping tests and other treatments off the market- went from 37% favorable in 2019 to 62%. Support of the FBI- who declined to investigate child-abusing Epstein and Nassar, while illegally spying on political rivals- kept a 66% approval rating.
And it cannot be stressed enough that it is the Democrats that are outliers here. Independents and Republicans are united in their (justifiable) contempt of these agencies. Whether we are talking about trust in the government, tech companies to censor, or mass media in general- Democrats are unique in overwhelmingly supporting these institutions while independents and republicans are not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C5GiuWJqYJg
My question is will Republicans do anything substantial about the size and scope of the agency when they regain power or will they leqrn to love these agency again?
I'd like to think that it the former but my faith in American attention spans is nonexistent and I know a new crisis will be around the corner pushing them towards more big government.
Depends on if they can resist the temotation to use these sgencies ti punish their enemies.
But ENB assures us that everyone wants technocrats now
Or is that sexocrats?
Look at the actual report here:
https://www.bennettinstitute.cam.ac.uk/media/uploads/files/The_Great_Reset.pdf
While the world over, faith in Technocrats has gone up, in the united states, faith in technocrats spiked in 2020, but is back DOWN to normal in 2021. So while this may be a world-wide trend it is not the same in the US.
In the US currently, just under 50% of residents felt that "experts, not government, [should] make decisions according to what they think is best for the country". Given the massive majority of Dems, and small minorities of independents and gop, that seems about right.
As always, ENB (and probably the UK group that wrote the article) seems to be viewing a world-wide phenomenon through the prism of Trump, but the ACTUAL results seem to indicate that it is much more difficult. In 2020, faith in "strong peaters who don't have to bother with elections" spiked but only to like 33% before plummeting to 25% in 2021. In the rest of the world, support for strong leaders continues to rise.
Skepticism in Democratic systems *is* at an all time high in the US. But in western europe it is relatively the same as 10 years ago.
"strong peaters who don't have to bother with elections" spiked but only to like 33% before plummeting to 25% in 2021.
Is this saying that Populist Authoritarians have "strong peaters?" How do they get them, by skinny dipping in a peat bog? And wouldn't that itch like Hell?
For peat’s sake!
That's the Populist Authoritarian slogan, the 21st Century version of "Workers of the World, Unite!" and "Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Führer!"
No you got it wrong. A "peater" is someone who burns peat to smoke barley for use in scotch. You are seeing a growing preference for consumption of smokey whiskey.
Mmmmmm Lagavulin
Well, I hope it's not as itchy on the innards as peat moss is on the skin.
And I certainly hope Populist Authoritarins don't put in the water supply in the name of some warped notion of "putting hair on your chest" and "restoring manhood to America." That seems to be their fixation of late.
Yes the sides have some fundamental differences. A 2020 Cato/YouGov poll about speech and censorship asked people what they would do with social media posts they think are false or disagreeable. Democrats were overwhelmingly in favor of censorship, even for posts supporting leftist views. Republicans were universally against censorship, even for posts supporting rightist views (e.g. claims of systemic racism, and showing US flag burning). The modern sides ARE different.
But, but, but JesseAZ....language is violence, silence is violence.
I mean, saying 'Let's Go Brandon' is worser than WW2!!!
/sarc
The people who support taking away children should have that done to themselves first, on principle.
Given that for many dedicated leftists, children are just a political-fashion accessory, they might like that.
Look at the percentage of Republicans in that poll who support the same shit. It's not insignificant. I
Fifty-eight percent (58%) of voters would oppose a proposal for federal or state governments to fine Americans who choose not to get a COVID-19 vaccine. However, 55% of Democratic voters would support such a proposal, compared to just 19% of Republicans and 25% of unaffiliated voters.
https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/partner_surveys/jan_2022/covid_19_democratic_voters_support_harsh_measures_against_unvaccinated
Both sides though. Double is pretty significant.
Fifty-nine percent (59%) of Democratic voters would favor a government policy requiring that citizens remain confined to their homes at all times, except for emergencies, if they refuse to get a COVID-19 vaccine. Such a proposal is opposed by 61% of all likely voters, including 79% of Republicans and 71% of unaffiliated voters.
It is far worse on the left, do you agree?
They sound almost like some "Socialist Workers Party" I seem to recall.
Those people are the enemies.
"Insane survey of Democratic voters in a recently poll:
-55% support fines against unvaxxed
-59% support house arrest
-48% support prison for questioning vax efficacy on social media
-45% support internment camps
-47% support surveillance
-29% support the state taking their kids"
And this kind of sentiment makes the fascist/communist comparisons more relevant every day. At first it might have been a bit hyperbolic to say these people are behaving like Germans did under the Nazis. But now we legit have a group of crazed people, obsessed with a "problematic other", who are blaming the ills of society on them. Despite the current climate where both the [unvaxxed] and the [vax X 2 + booster with masks] are getting COVID anyways. There isnt even a strong reason to hate the unvaxxed at this point, but they want to ruin these people both financially and socially for not complying with the party line.
The difference is getting smaller every day.
CNN to begin actually fact checking their own reporting.
.Alex Koppelman
@AlexKoppelman
·
Jan 18, 2022
Hello Twitter! Some very exciting MEDIA JOBS to tell you about. I'm hiring 3 people for a new CNN team dedicated to covering misinformation. Thread about the team/jobs starts here. Please feel free to share far and wide, and if you’re interested, reach out or apply at the links.
Alex Koppelman
@AlexKoppelman
What do we mean by covering misinformation? Really it's about covering reality: The uses, abuses, and distortions of it, the people twisting it, and the effect that has on all of us. We already do a lot of important work on this; we want to do more.
That CNN just announced the hiring of known liar Rex Chapman for CNN+, this is quite a turnaround.
Four states — Texas, Arizona, Idaho, and Utah — have seen full recovery in their labor markets following COVID-19 and the lockdown-induced recession.
“Texas and Arizona have joined two other states in recovering all the jobs they lost at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, leading a trend that is expected to include another dozen states by the middle of this year,” The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday. “The states, which also include Utah and Idaho, have benefited from demographic shifts before and during the pandemic — experiencing outsize payroll growth in retail, warehousing, technology and transportation industries.”
https://www.dailywire.com/news/four-red-states-recover-all-pre-recession-jobs-as-many-blue-states-are-still-lagging-behind
Draconian mandates and lockdowns work.
Any breakdown of how many of those jobs were filled by legal immigrants from CA & NY?
Who needs 2 weeks to stop covid. Biden is going to do it in 1 day with 400 million disposable masks for 370 million Americans.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/politics/white-house-to-distribute-400-million-n95-masks-starting-next-week
If we all just wear a mask for the first 100 days, covid will disappear.
Well, apparently, sometime next week the coof will be officially eradicated.
Easy there, my equine-snail friend. Why cure COVID now with November so far off? I predict any "Mission Accomplished" moment will have to account for human (lack of) memory, so probably a week before the mid-terms.
They won't wait that long. All of their early votes will already be cast by then.
All of their early votes are already cast and safely stowed in the trunk.
I'm sure that 1.2 masks per person will finally defeat covid for good!
Stockpile of N95 masks with well connected vendors? Check
CDC edict that only the N95 masks provide the right amount of protection? Check
Stock trading aligned with the mask providing company? Check
Government purchase of n95 masks to distribute to citizens using our money to purchase? Check
Activate the money funnels!
If only Reason had more editors.
Are you saying ENB is a crap writer?
How dare you
She is an editor, not a writer. And a senior one at that.
Tweets don’t edit themselves before being reposted at Reason
Twitter is working on that.
Muh private company
Is she having "Senior moments" from being steeped in Tweets about Biden?
But... How much did it rise in the US... That is what we really want to know.
Split the difference with 11 points?
declining faith in democracy was especially potent in the U.S., where the share of people who say democracy is a "bad" system of governance went from 10.5 percent in 2019 to 25.8 percent in 2021.
I guess that is a good thing since we live in a Republic.
That 25.8 probably coincides with where AOC and her band of demons would poll nationally. I'm sure it's purely coincidental, though.
I wonder how much of that 25.8% is folks who honestly believe that the complete dearth of evidence of Trump losing the election is definitive proof of a grand conspiracy to steal the election.
I don't know any Trump supporters that think democracy is bad. Maybe you can enlighten me.
Except for the majority on these comments who say democracy is bad because it can't be trusted, and then cite the lack of evidence of fraud as proof of fraud.
Can you name a single person who days democracy is bad?
We may note that we are NOT a democracy (that whole Bill of Rights is proof of that), but who is saying "democracy is bad"?
I'll openly say pure democracy is bad. The Greeks proved that.
+1 Trial of Socrates.
+100 Or any other Witch-Hunt or Lynch Mob.
Pure democracy is a terrible idea. But democracy as an idea is not a bad idea at all. I'd trust, to paraphrase William Buckley, 400 randos over 400 "experts"
Democracy without rights is bad, I agree.
Notice sarc doesn't differentiate what he means by democracy. He uses it as a catch all to go after everyone he disagrees with. The same dishonesty most democrats use when discussing democracy.
Ah, but no idea is bad to the one who thinks it's theirs exclusively, nor is it bad as long as it stays in the thinker's head.
I can confirm what sarcasmic has said. I have had more than one commenter here tell me democracy is bad.
Maybe I’ll try to hunt up examples later.
Feel free.
You know they are going to post anyone who pointed out the issues with the 2020 elections and claim victory even though it doesn't actually show who is against "democracy". They are just pushing the DNC talking points on democracy at this point.
When people say election results can't be trusted, cite a lack of evidence of fraud as proof of fraud, and then attempt to prevent the certification of the election, I'd have to say that they and their supporters believe democracy is bad.
So even if they don't mouth the words "I think democracy is bad" it would be difficult to believe them if they said otherwise.
“cite a lack of evidence of fraud”
Yep, no evidence. Jesus you’re a dishonest piece of garbage sarc.
So...you're full of shit. OK. Thanks.
So...you're full of shit. OK. Thanks.
Oh come on. If people refuse to accept election results and go so far as to attack the fucking Capital, isn't rather obvious that they don't like democracy? Well, they like it when it goes their way, but when it doesn't they see violence as an acceptable reaction.
And you've got people all over this forum cheering them on.
What could that possibly be other than an attack on democracy by people who think it's bad (when they don't get their way)?
Which commentators attacked the capital? Because this is news to me!
"Oh come on. If people refuse to accept election results and go so far as to attack the fucking Capital, isn't rather obvious that they don't like democracy?"
No. It means they feel the election was stolen and nobody wanted to address their concerns (still don't, mind you).
Democrats have questioned election results with every election they lost for a long time.
"And you've got people all over this forum cheering them on."
Most of us are doing it mockingly after Reason DID applaud the riots throughout 2020. But those don't matter....
No. It means they feel the election was stolen and nobody wanted to address their concerns (still don't, mind you).
There have been plenty of investigations and court cases, all of which revealed bupkis.
Democrats have questioned election results with every election they lost for a long time
That's because they're crybabies. You expect it. The GOP is supposed to have class. But now that they've become The Trump Party led by a crybaby, they're no different than the people they hate.
Most of us are doing it mockingly after Reason DID applaud the riots throughout 2020. But those don't matter....
I don't recall Reason applauding riots. They did draw a distinction between riots in Portland Oregon and peaceful protests in Everytown USA. There were a few marches over that summer where I live, and the only danger was from the rednecks hanging out in front of churches with loaded rifles itching to murder leftists. Nardz and friends.
"I don't recall Reason applauding riots. They did draw a distinction between riots in Portland Oregon and peaceful protests in Everytown USA."
1/6 was more peaceful than virtually every protest in every city in 2020. Hate to break it to you.
"1/6 was more peaceful than virtually every protest in every city in 2020. Hate to break it to you."
That may be. The unique aspect of 1/6, which puts it in a category of notoriety from all of those other riots, is that it was an attempt to stop the peaceful, lawful transition from one Presidential administration to the next.
LOL! Sarc did exactly what I said he would do. And only proves his ignorance because there is no lack of evidence, there is quite a bit of it.
Hilarious.
There have been plenty of investigations and court cases, all of which revealed bupkis.
Almost 2 dozen court cases have now been found in decision against the state for illegal election changes.
Multiple people have already been indicted on fraud, a few even already convicted.
Ga and Az admitted to thousands of people who appeared to vote twice, but didn't pursue charges.
Wisconsin is now looking into voting of nursing home residents.
What are you talking about you ignorant leftist?
“There have been plenty of investigations and court cases, all of which revealed bupkis.”
Sarc attempts to take Jeffy’s crown of biggest liar of the commentariat.
Too hard to find an example by googling. I don't keep a notebook of examples, as I've seen some obsessive commenters here do.
No shit. Occasionally when Reason logs me out and I'm subjected to comments from JesseAZ and Mother's Lament, I'm downright creeped out by their admission to having pages and pages of bookmarks to "prove" whatever nonsense they're peddling about me or some other recipient of their troll's wrath.
Know what you mean.
Sounds rough to make a claim and not be able to admit you cannot provide any evidence.
"I'm downright creeped out by their admission to having pages and pages of bookmarks to "prove" whatever nonsense they're peddling about me or some other recipient of their troll's wrath."
I'm literally laughing my ass off.
sarcasmic whines about us using direct quotes and citations for our arguments, and ferocious sea lion Laursen, the queen of demanding citations for widely known facts, actually agrees.
The combination of stupidity and hypocrisy here is amazing.
Sounds rough to make a claim and not be able to admit you cannot provide any evidence.
Well excuse the fuck out of me for not bookmarking comments and taking copious notes on these Reason comments.
I'll leave that to the trolls I have on mute.
"Sounds rough to make a claim and not be able to admit you cannot provide any evidence."
Nah, not really. If it were a super important claim, yes, but this one wasn't that important.
You can believe whatever you want. sarcasmic and I have both attested to what we have seen, make of that what you will.
sarcasmic and I have both attested to what we have seen, make of that what you will.
I don't think we see the same things that others see. When we see some sour grapes jerkoff whining about election fraud they see someone speaking truth to power. When we see someone claiming that the entire voting system is a sham and the proof is the fact that there is no proof, they see someone exposing a grand conspiracy. When we see people bleating "Fuck Joe Biden" like it's something important (and these same people would have freaked the fuck out had someone said "Fuck Donald Trump") they swoon to the mating call of the Trump Party, formerly known as the GOP.
Perception is reality, and people perceive things very differently.
sarcasmic
January.19.2022 at 12:43 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
No shit. Occasionally when Reason logs me out and I'm subjected to comments from JesseAZ and Mother's Lament, I'm downright creeped out by their admission to having pages and pages of bookmarks to "prove" whatever nonsense they're peddling about me or some other recipient of their troll's wrath.
Because you constantly lie about what you've said and demand citations. And even when provided them or them being in the same thread you deny you say it.
sarcasmic
January.19.2022 at 1:58 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
Sounds rough to make a claim and not be able to admit you cannot provide any evidence.
Well excuse the fuck out of me for not bookmarking comments and taking copious notes on these Reason comments.
I'll leave that to the trolls I have on mute.
So you're a hypocrite when you demand citations. Good to know you are a hypocrite in every action you take.
Oh look! The obsessive troll is still obsessed!
Go away, loser. Please.
You can believe whatever you want. sarcasmic and I have both attested to what we have seen, make of that what you will.
And dozens of people here have attested to you two jokers and what they've seen. And you cry about them being liars even when provided direct proof after you ask for citations.
You two are giant hypocrites.
sarcasmic
January.19.2022 at 3:53 pm
Flag Comment Mute User
Oh look! The obsessive troll is still obsessed!
Go away, loser. Please.
This must be all of the ideas you are always discussing lol.
You're afraid to actually engage because every time you do you're proven to be an idiot.
Here's why sarcasmic and Laursen are so furious about being quoted. It's all the times that they've admitted to trolling coming back to bite them when they're pretending to be measured, reasonable commenters:
sarcasmic
August.12.2021 at 4:45 pm
I only show up to watch the clowns duke it out while tossing in this or that provocation. Bread and circuses. This is a circus.
I like to stir shit up. So what.
Mike Laursen
September.18.2021 at 11:38 am
SQRLSY, can you cover for me today? In a typical day, I usually:
– post a comment or two pointing out logical flaws, contradictions and partisanship in Ken’s essays, which he regards as examples of flawless logical thinking
– post a comment or two pointing out that Ashli Babbitt was not a saint and the January 6th MAGA rioters were violent
– post one “Fuck Tulpa!” comment
the founding fathers had a healthy skepticism of the dangers of democracy and that's why they designed the system we have today, including a senate that is insulated from the whims of mob trends of the day...
17A took care of that.
indeed. definitely in the conversation of 'worst amendments'
Ayuh. It ended one of the most important checks on the federal government, which was the state governments having the ability to tell the populist House to get fucked.
the majority on these comments who say democracy is bad
I can confirm what sarcasmic has said. I have had more than one commenter here tell me democracy is bad.
You can confirm that 'more than one' is equivalent to 'the majority'? What you actually just confirmed is that you are a goalpost shifting waste of time.
Conflate. Deflect. Distract.
"Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!"
-MIT Cheerleaders
Marginalizing criticism by responding with inanity. The shitposters equivalent of covering fire.
Pointing out inanity with inanity isn't inane.
It certainly is not constructive or honest. My criticism was.
I'd have to take a bunch of people off mute to answer that question.
You'd have to understand the different types of democracy for your point to be accurate. It is clear you and Mike do not.
Did I say people? I meant retards.
SHOW US THE LIST!
Same problem here.
Over the weekend jeff unmuted JesseAZ and gave him a chance to act like a human being. Did you see that? It was like watching Charlie Brown try to kick a football. Poor jeff. I hope he learned his lesson.
Yeah, I saw.
I have to say, I decided to damikesc off mute a few days ago to give him another try. He is engaging in real conversation part of the time, being rude every now and then. He's nowhere in the JesseAz league for being consistently worthless to have unmuted.
damikesc isn't a total tool. Humorless and too literal, but not a piece of shit liar like JesseAZ.
Not sure what Chuck's problem is. Dude is downright hostile at times.
I know there is a commenter with "Chuck" in his name, but I've had him muted so long I don't remember much about him.
Chuck isn't a total ass. I muted him when he got on the "Let's all be cool and call sarc a drunken pedophile" bandwagon, but a couple weeks back I started to unmute people. Several have earned a new spot on the iggy list, but he isn't one of them.
Though I'm sure after reading this comment he'll beg and plead to be muted so he can be cool like the trolls.
An here sarcasmic once again postulates on what a "muted" person has said without actually reading it.
Jeff was his usually inane self and I responded to each of his arguments Sarc.
Sorry you are such a pathetic liar.
Hey troll. I don't care. That's why you're on mute. Go fuck your mom or something. Leave the adults alone.
Wait... You brought me up in discussion, lied about what Jeff and I discussed, and then say you don't care.
Come again?
You do know you're proving once again to the world you are actually just a troll right? LOL.
Yeah that was funny. Lying Jeffy said he unmuted Jesse, then acted like he hadn’t already responded previously about Joe Rogan. But he’d already done that a week before.
Lying Jeffy has JRDS.
And the funny thing is that they both know Jeff lied, but they decide to play pretend with each other for a half dozen posts anyway.
It always amazes me that they somehow think that they're tricking everyone with stunts a toddler would see through.
Sarc and Mike think everyone is as dumb and forgetful for them. That's why he is raging that we now save his comments to prove how much of a liar he is above after his repeated claims he never said things he actually did.
No, most people say democracy is bad when the outcome does not match their preferred pogrom, er, program.
Democracy is, by definition, a pogrom once it bumps against Individual Rights, which usually doesn't take long.
Really, Democracy is just rule by whomever can whip up a crowd with hysteria, division, scapegoating, and lies.
Vote fraud = democracy?
So not a leftist guys.
So not a dumbass guys.
No sarc, is definitely one of those.
"definitive proof of a grand conspiracy to steal the election."
Not like they wrote a fucking article about it or anything...
Being against vote fraud, illegal election rule changes, etc means you're against democracy.
- Sarc and Mike.
You're just all butthurt your guy lost is all.
There's nothing wrong with ensuring people can vote. Your whole argument lines up to "they shouldn't be allowed to cast a vote." Considering all the fraud found has mainly been FOR trump and at such a paltry rate that it didn't affect a single thing it seems that it confirms- you're just butthurt.
...except nobody says they should not vote.
We insist that THEY vote, not anybody on their behalf.
Considering all the fraud found has mainly been FOR trump and at such a paltry rate that it didn't affect a single thing
Why do we need to overhaul the voting system then?
Literally everything you just said was a lie and has been linked here multiple times.
Shouldn't you be cleaning your guns while shouting at Twitter?
Ideas!
You should've killed yourself and saved your daughter the abuse
You're like school at five in the morning. No class.
Why does your daughter have to take special ed classes?
If you stopped shaving your head people might stop calling you a penis with ears.
Thank you for demonstrating
That you look like a penis with ears? Um, ok. You're welcome I guess.
That's definitely not what you demonstrated
Rub your head and then foam at the mouth! There you go! A penis with ears!
Didn't you claim to be an adult talking above sarc?
Have you ever tried not trolling?
I wonder how many are progressives who think parents disagreeing with school boards is terrorism?
Agreed, the survey is useless unless it parses out the data more.
Democracy is a really crappy system of mob rule that completely ignores individual rights. That's why we are nominally a constitutional republic
Two wolves disagree with you.
If only there was a consitution to protect the rights of sheep.
Well, at least the rights of black sheep.
I can get with that...
Black Sheep--The Choice Is Yours
https://youtu.be/K9F5xcpjDMU
"Hey, Beavis!...Is this, like, John Galt's speech set to Rap?...Uh! Huh-Huh!"
"Uh, Yeah-Yeah! Heh-Heh! 'A is A, Mofo!' Heh-Heh!"
Or that protects the rights of rational beings anymore.
Pure democracy is bad. The founding fathers understood this, which is why we have a constitutional republic.
The problem is the Democrats have perverted the term democracy to simply mean whatever rules and regulations democrats want. Don't want federalized elections? You're against democracy! The GOP wins based on electoral college, you're against democracy!
No, for many Democrats "democracy" is now just a holy word, with a flexible and unknowable meaning, beyond its righteous connotation.
The problem is that Democracy is an imprecise term in general. When speaking generally, the US is a Democracy- a nation governed by its citizens. That those citizens vote for pluralities, majorities or super majorities, or that they have certain rules and limitations (which are often changeable via their own democratic processes) is all details. While it is fashionable to say "We are not a democracy, but a republic", it is also accurate to say that "Our republic is a specific implementation of democracy".
It is such a general classification that trying to interpret what John Q Public is really talking about when they say "Democracy is bad" is a fool's errand.
The problem is that sarc and White Mike post nothing that isn't fallacious. They conflate the issues with Motte and Bailey, deflect from issues by shifting goalposts, and when confronted, they flail and bleat ad hominems in an attempt to distract. The pattern is so vivid, it is unmistakable.
They get accused of being paid shills because they have been argumentatively curbstomped so many times, it makes no sense that they continually come back for more.
Here is one more stomping: what sarc is claiming is disdain for democracy is actually just reasonable commenters pointing out that the U.S. is a republic. And It does happen all the time, because it is true. Whenever the EC gets discussed, one of the Jeffys opines about the unfairness of it all and gets roundly argued into the ground.
sarc and White Mike lurk in the background and then throw arguments back at the people that offend them later with zero context. Mostly trolling for outraged replies. Again, this is a vivid pattern.
I was replying specifically to Jesse, who in this post was replying to the OP's "We live in a republic" statement.
I wasn't commenting on Sarc or Mike's trolling-disguised-as-analysis because that conversation is boring. On the other hand, really getting to the bottom of "what do people mean by democracy" is still important. While SaGN's point is true, the fact is that many people saying "democracy is bad" have the US in mind when they say that. These kids actually believe the US system is bad, and they aren't going to say "Oh, it's a republic? Carry on then!"
I fully understand a republic is a subset of democracy, why my initial clause is about pure democracy.
that conversation is boring
It really is.
The populist wave that swept the world in recent years shows signs of crashing. But don't expect good things to take its place.
I can't imagine a world in which elites make policy decisions.
What about a world controlled by Top Elites?
TOP. NON-BIRTHING PERSONS.
My first campaign ad, '37 Seconds.' #JustLikeMe
Lol, "wastes money" on enforcement. THAT'S THE WHOLE POINT.
"My first campaign ad, '37 Seconds.' #JustLikeMe"
I bet his wife is thrilled with that whole "37 seconds" thing...
And why do Pot activists always make a distinction between dealers and users when campaigning for whatever it is they support?
Just where do they think they get their weed? The Good Pot Fairy? Famous Amos floating down from the sky like with Latke on Taxi?
Latke's Cookies--Taxi (Fast forward to 12:08)
https://youtu.be/3VsTyz-ARu0
Damnit! Pot dealers need good vibes and love too!
Wait, so the federal government has just been hoarding N95 masks all this time?
Aren't they supposed to? Wasn't one of the major failings of the Obama and Trump admins to not replenish a strategic stock of PPE after one of the bad flu seasons last decade?
I seem to recall much bitching from all sides about this two years ago.
Usually one stockpiles when the shitstorm has blown over, not it the middle of it.
This is a lame, face-saving gesture, just like every time they release oil from the SPR. But the government clearly needs a stock for both its own use (we may not approve of the government running healthcare facilities, but they do) and to serve as a backstop for private entities. The "hoarding" itself isn't a problem.
Why can't Gummint just get out of the way of production of petroleum and PPE, so that the products can be cheaper and private individuals and private companies can stockpile all they want?
And why is it called a "Strategic Reserve" when Gummint does it, but "Hoarder Wrecker Doomsday Prepping" when individuals do it?
"Inquiring Minds Want To Know..."
There would probably be less production overall because the gov't is a major purchaser. And it's possible that the strategic reserves are crowding out some private stockpiling, but I don't think it's much: everybody prefers to not waste investments on spare inventory, for obvious reasons.
But with prices for everything going up, having spare inventory of non-perishable products you'll use on a daily basis anyway is a safeguard against future inflation. Also, it makes better use of real estate to use every spare square foot to either produce or store necessities.
There was a book on this subject years ago called The Alpha Strategy by John Pugsley.
Although I think he later on got into some dubious "Social Darwinist" thinking as the years went by, the idea of having a hard asset bird in the hand is better than two in the money tree bush that may just produce worthless dead leaves.
You can never have an efficient distribution of goods under a centralized system.
Agreed, but you don't see large stockpiles under an efficient distribution system. This poses problems for demand shocks like COVID.
I would argue that the centralized system didn't work and won't work at anticipating demand shocks either. Nothing we can do about the unexpected. Next time the need will be for something else and we don't yet know what that something else is.
So get Gummint out of the way of peaceful production and exchange and make MOAR of everything!
What's the worst that could happen? Raffles tickets for free bomb shelters?
I would argue that the centralized system didn't work and won't work at anticipating demand shocks either.
/shrug. I chalk it up to execution rather than design: everyone knew something like this was coming because it actually happens pretty frequently, though not often to this extent.
"Wait, so the federal government has just been hoarding N95 masks all this time?"
Duh, why do you think Fauci initially said people shouldn't wear masks? He wanted time for the government to get a hold of them all first
Or maybe they knew that effective masks would have ended COVID far too soon, i.e. before people went to the polls in November, 2020.
How's that for 3D chess?
One order includes 4 individual rapid antigen #COVID19 tests
I assume those are continuous tests. I mean, testing oneself four times would be utterly useless. Snapshots in time.
I plan on selling mine to leftist chicken littles at a premium.
Return to Sender
Address unknown
No such person
You guys want to end up on a list? Cuz that’s how you end up on a list.
Rosa Parks likely ended up on a list.
Rosa parks stood for something, or er sat down for something
Nice!
We all already are. It's just a question of which list and where in your dwelling to take cover and keep the seige weapons.
Oh, we’re all on at least one list. Best to limit the number of lists for when they’re cross referenced though.
Funny, I just said that to my wife 10 minutes ago.
return to sender?
The US Postal Service’s motto, before self-adhesive stamps, was: Lick it before you stick it
I think your always supposed to use 2 - 5 days apart or some nonsense. I looked at the package once and decided I wasn't sick.
We discussed this last week, but this is absolutely correct. In fact, I find testing to be counter productive.
While testing is a single point in time, it only tells you if enough antigens or viral genetic material is present at the site of sampling. It cannot definitively answer the real questions: Am I infected with covid, and am I infectious?
My kid tested positive and never showed any symptom other than a little phlegm in her throat. I had a sore throat for 2 days testing negative until the third day when it moved to my sinuses and the test came in positive. Further, many of these same tests are not suitable for telling you if you can return to normal life (PCR tests can test positive WEEKS after you get better).
I spent a decent amount of my career solving the problems that come when your monitoring only gives a result periodically. When you consider that people cannot just test on regular intervals indefinitely, the value of testing goes down.
If you are feeling sick, stay home. When symptoms are bad, testing can tell you that you are carrying COVID, but that is it. But it should not be used to RULE OUT that you have COVID.
Come on, man, don't you even believe in (pseudo) tech as a way of life?
Fuck, I've tested positive, repeatedly, for over a year now. No symptoms and my very immuno compromised wife has not once tested positive, so something is sketchy.
It really puts paid to all those articles that Bailey was posting talking about how terrible it was that we don't have testing. It is the sort of shallow thinking that you get from someone who thinks they are smart but don't understand the problem they are solving for.
"Hey we can test daily and people won't spread the virus" sounds great at first blush. But we know it isn't that simple- people are sick but not in the sinuses. They have gotten better but continue to shed dead virus (and therefore test positive).
Testing was never going to be the panacea that Bailey thought it was (and I pointed this out to him at the very beginning of the pandemic). It might have been useful for stopping the spread when it was in a handful of people, but once you have community spread, there is nothing to be done.
https://reason.com/2020/03/11/how-government-red-tape-stymied-testing-and-made-the-coronavirus-epidemic-worse/?comments=true#comment-8162982
I am not saying that tests are useless- they do give SOME information, and all information is useful. They just aren't the solution to all our ills. In countries across Europe where testing is ubiquitous, they aren't actually seeing any difference in the spread.
New York Attorney General Letitia James said-
Stop right there.
Do you want us to collaborate and listen next?
Hammer time.
back with my brand new invention
Waiting for the OBL it's #mullertime post.
Another bombshell.
We've reached the tipping point.
The walls are closing in.
It's the beginning of the end.
#Resist
"Donald Trump and Donald Tramp living in the men's Shelter"
Those wise rhymin' and stealin' sages, knew were he'd end up eventually, in the 80s at that.
New York Attorney General Letitia James said- "Everybody does it but we're going to single out Trump because, well, politics that's why."
Wait, so the federal government has just been hoarding N95 masks all this time?
Better than ammunition.
D.C. now requires proof of vaccination to do things like eat indoors and go to gyms.
"NO ONE IS GOING TO MAKE YOU SHOW PAPERS."
It is clear DC Demorats are bringing back Jim Crowe segragation as blacks are incapable of getting papers to show. It is the whole no shoes, no shirt work around all over again.
Aren't the best work-arounds done with no shirt and no shoes?
Gym, Restaurant, Public Transport - "Papiers bitte!"
Voting - "Proof of ID? No need, don't worry your little head about it. Now let's help you fill that out"
"declining faith in democracy was especially potent in the U.S."
If you're a youngster, who can blame you for having these opinions? They're being bombarded by: democracy is dying, democracy allowed a fascist into power over the past four years, it's a system of white supremacy, and they go to school where many teachers and professors are, quite likely, going to parrot all of those ideas.
Yep. Feature, not bug.
Omicron is being used as a catch-all excuse for policy changes...
Almost as though COVID itself was always a pretense.
Cooling on populists and gravitating towards technocrats? Ah, that is why Biden's popularity is so high and Trump's is in the dump. And the CDC rep is at all time highs. And demonstrations against lock downs aren't on the increase.
Keep up the great reporting Reason!
Huh? ENB’s job each morning is to find a bunch of interesting stuff to read with your coffee. So, this morning she found the results of a survey, and talked about that the survey said. — And you are complaining to Reason about the results of a survey some other organization conducted.
Yeah. How dare we expect ENB to take five seconds to consider if a study that shows a decline in support for Bad Orange Man and his ilk makes sense in the real world.
ENB’s job each morning is to find a bunch of interesting stuff
Copypasting your husband's twitter feed isn't exactly "finding".
i'll take the ven diagram of populists who aren't technocrats over any technocrats any fucking day of the week.
I'll be happy as a point on the graph staying outside the reach of both.
Also why more people are moving to Florida than any other state right now.
The Pelosis (Pelos-I?) plan to retire to Florida not stay in CA. Just sayin'...
"Voters Around the World Are Cooling on Populists"
Good. Populism is a truly vile ideology.
In fact I'd argue Koch / Reason libertarianism is effectively the opposite of populism. Our philosophy maintains that the most important function of government is to create the conditions in which billionaires (like our benefactor Charles Koch) can get even richer. That's why we support policies like open borders and a $0.00 / hour minimum wage.
#InDefenseOfBillionaires
I presume that the banner in the photo translates as "For Our Free Stuff".
Biden and the Secret Service still have not fully released emails regarding travel from Hunter biden and possibly other Rosemont Seneca people in their pursuit of business deals while Joe was Vice President.
The redacted emails do show redacted names working for the Vice Presidential Protective Detail, and the Secret Service emailed someone at Rosemont Seneca on May 23, 2014, asking about the plans for Biden’s “travel to and return from” Paris. A heavily redacted email that day from someone at Rosemont Seneca indicates that the plan was for Hunter Biden and two unnamed associates to fly from New York to Paris on May 28, 2014, and for the trio to fly “Air Astana” and “out of Astana," Kazakhstan’s capital city, via London on June 3, 2014.
“I see that Hunter is departing from Kazakhstan to come back to the U.S.,” wrote an unidentified member of the vice presidential detail, who asked for an itinerary.
Someone at Rosemont Seneca replied that “what I know is they are flying private from Paris to K[azakhstan].” The member of the vice presidential detail asked how many days Biden would be in Kazakhstan and asked “if there will be room on the private flight for at least [redacted] of our guys (preferably [redacted]) we would greatly appreciate it.” The records appear incomplete and are unclear on what happened next. Hunter Biden’s specific travel itinerary is repeatedly redacted in the emails.
In laptop emails, Biden said his Secret Service detail was annoyed when he ditched them to pursue business deals in Kazakhstan.
“Vadim — I’ve chosen to carry on from Paris without the Secret Service,” he wrote in a message dated May 26, 2014. “They are not happy about it, but it seemed far too complicated and unnecessary. Best, Hunter.”
Pozharskyi had wanted to know how many Secret Service members might be accompanying Biden to Kazakhstan.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/grassley-and-johnson-demand-hunter-bidens-full-travel-records-from-secret-service
Kazakhstan is beautiful in the springtime.
Yeah, elitist young people can be assholes, especially to their parents. Perhaps we need to embrace 65th trimester abortions.
"...Another scary finding from the study is that the pandemic produced some new avenues for illiberalism to frolic..."
Like letting tin-pot-dictator wannabes 'plan' large portions of the economy?
"As it stands, antitrust laws say the FTC and DOJ can stop mergers that substantially diminish competition or create a monopoly in that industry."
Fine. Now apply that logic to government.
Ok... Question:
We are all terribly concerned about a wave of populism.. which is Authoritarianism which is nationalism which is totally racist (thank you for that summary)
So it is on the decline. We got rid of the evil, authoritarian Trump.
And now we have the totally centrist Biden.
How you feeling about all this "not authoritarian" we got going on around here?
Cognitive dissonance is a bitch.
Populists are rabble-rousing know-nothing candidates who appeal to the lowest common denominator and win by amassing popular support from a majority of the voters.
Democracy is rule by the majority.
Ergo, populists are a threat to democracy. It's literally hanging by a thread.
"We Have Given You A Republic. It Remains To Be Seen If You Will Be Able To Retain It" - Benjamin Franklin
"I have added the banana" - Joe Biden
I thought Ben's quote was: "A Republic, if you can keep it."
And I thought Biden's quote was: "I like 'nanner pudding!"
“ Trump Organization used fraudulent and misleading asset valuations on multiple properties to obtain economic benefits, including loans, insurance coverage, and tax deductions for years."
He’s going to jail this time!, right?
…right?
No jail time until "New York Attorney General Letitia James said . . . " becomes "New York Attorney General Letitia James proved . . . ".
Yeah, this is PR stuff so far.
So no charges against banks, insurers, and government agencies for failing to do their due diligence on Trump Org. "misleading" valuations? The masters of "misleading" are, of course, virtually every politician who ever ran for office.
And all of the properties are worth more now than they were back then, when the valuation were misleading.
Droolin' Joe; the asshole who keeps on giving:
"Before pullout, watchdog warned of Afghan air force collapse"
[...]
"KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — Months before President Joe Biden announced the U.S.’s complete withdrawal from Afghanistan last year, Washington’s watchdog warned that the Afghan air force would collapse without critical American aid, training and maintenance. The report was declassified Tuesday..."
https://www.wpri.com/news/us-and-world/before-pullout-watchdog-warned-of-afghan-air-force-collapse/
Sumbitch could fuck up a free lunch.
(1) Nobody knew.
(2) He was following Trump’s plan.
(3) It was all the Afghans’ fault.
(4) That was
twofour days ago.(5) He actually did well and should be praised.
You can't prove he did worse than Trump woulda' done!
(pretty sure it was turd who tried to make that one fly)
Pretty sure Deesarc co-signed.
Sloppy Pullout
And Biden did it with humility!
Lucky for us, we’re a Constitutional Republic, not a democracy. How did that rate in this study?
They don't draw a distinction between what is and isn't within the proper purview of democracy, and the line between them is the real world consequences of including or excluding public opinion.
From an intellectual perspective, we understand that people can't live in a free society if they can be subjected to treaties, wars, naturalization rules, and taxes if the can't hold the people who impose these policies on them accountable at the ballot box. Intellectually, we also understand that we can't live in a free society if our religious beliefs, free speech rights, etc. are subjected to a popularity contest. It should also be generally understood, however, that the line between these things were not drawn arbitrarily.
Our First Amendment religious protections reflect the outcome of the Thirty Year War and the solutions that brought an end to the fighting in the Holy Roman Empire via the Peace of Westphalia. Those religious protections were not a theoretical construct. They're a practical solution to real world problems--the negative consequences in the real world of violating people's religious rights are real.
The consequences of letting kings declare wars and tax the people to finance them--without the consent of their representatives--were not theoretical. Kings did this without our consent for centuries, and the real world negative consequences are well known and avoided when the executive needs to ask our representatives for their consent before they declare wars and tax the fuck out of us.
I wish more people understood that the negative consequences of crossing the lines circumscribing the proper purview of democracy, in our constitutional republic, were not arbitrarily drawn and are not unforeseeable. I suspect it's because so many progressives see the Constitution as an obstacle to their whole program, so they're hostile to any idea that suggests there is any legitimate real world basis for the principles the Constitution contains. This is another reason why progressives are America's most horrible people.
In much of Europe, "libertarianism" implies radical left anarchism/communism. The same terms often mean different things to different people, and things can get really confusing when we don't define our terms and stick by them. The definition of "populism", for instance, seems too fluid--to the point of self-contradiction. "Populism" is not an evolving term.
Populism—"a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups," according to the Oxford English Dictionary—sounds pretty good on the surface. But in practice, it has meant many authoritarian, redistributionist, and nativist ideas, embraced by candidates and parties with disdain for liberal democratic values.
I 100% agree with the OED definition of populism--in all of its forms from left to right--populism is a reaction to elitism. The latter statement about populism being disdainful of liberal democratic values is nothing but editorializing. Elitism is about politicians, academics, and journalists inflicting their will on an unwilling population. Joe Biden, Chuck Schumer, bureaucrats, academics, and the press trying to inflict Build Back Better, the Green New Deal, and a suspension of the filibuster on the people of West Virginia is an excellent example of elitism.
Meanwhile, Joe Manchin refusing to support Build Back Better or suspend the filibuster--because doing either is extremely unpopular with the voters of West Virginia--is an excellent example of democracy at work. He's representing what the voters want. If Joe Manchin were to start acting like an elitist, seeking to inflict unpopular elitist policies on the unwilling overwhelming majority in West Virginia, that would not only be undemocratic. It would also provoke a populist reaction, which is to say that populism is not undemocratic per se. Populism is what you get when elitists deny the people their appropriate say in policy.
In short, populism is a reaction to an attack on democracy. It's what you get when democracy is denied by elitists. When it comes to policies involving spending, taxes, treaties, immigration, declaring wars, etc., there are universal negative consequences associated with ignoring the people's will on these issues--and that is why these issues are within the proper purview of democracy. Elitists imagine that the populist consequences of ignoring the people on these issues are optional and avoidable, but they are horribly wrong. It is the elitist willful disregard of public opinion that is the ultimate attack on democracy. Populism is a reaction to that--an attempt of the people to reassert their voice on policy.
There are people in this world who are so dumb, they think the EU and the US can set their immigration policies however they want--without regard for public opinion--and it won't provoke a populist backlash that pushes the UK out of the EU, and drives the establishment of Europe out of power in France, Germany, Italy, the United States, and beyond. That these idiots persist in their stupid beliefs despite the events of the last five years is amazing! We should add this to list of other stupid things progressives believe--like the belief that they can increase the money supply faster than the rate of real economic growth without spurring inflation.
Yes, there are often real world negative consequences of our choices, that are not a mystery, and they don't disappear because we don't like them. A populist reaction to elitism is one example. Airplanes falling out of the sky when they run out of fuel is another. Progressivism is all about using the coercive power of government to inflict what they see as sacrifices for the greater good on the unwilling. You could argue that progressives blame the populist reaction to that on undemocratic forces because the progressives are wildly dishonest, but simple ignorance and stupidity are more than sufficient explanations on their own.
Intelligent and knowledgeable pro-democracy anti-elitists understand that deferring to public opinion on issues that are within the proper purview of democracy is the right thing to do--even if public opinion is wrong on the issues--because the populist reaction to elitism is often worse than getting this or that issue wrong. It's ultimately the contempt of the elite for public opinion that makes things so bad--they're are so contemptuous of the American people, that elitists don't believe that the American people can be persuaded to do the right thing or the smart thing.
I largely agree with Ken's insight.
The term "populist" is used primarily by left wing elites to denigrate/demonize popular moderate, conservative, libertarian and/or independent politicians, authors, commentators.
"Right-wing" and "Far-right" are also terms left wingers often use to denigrate/demonize anyone who supports freedom for individuals and businesses (i.e. libertarians) and who opposes Big Brother socialism/welfare, increased government debt/inflation, left wing violence/riots, lockdowns and vaccine/mask mandates.
I use "progressive" and "lefty" and "liberal" for gentry class kooks who are actually regressive, facist and authoritarian.
To be fair though, that's also what they call themselves.
They want us to think the entirety of the left is progressive, but Manchin and Sinema are there to show us that isn't so. I don't believe either Manchin or Sinema are up for reelection this year, but Democrats are likely to be far more progressive after the midterms. The Representatives and Senators that pay for progressive radicalism with their seats are likely to be in more purple and red districts and states--where the moderates are. If things continue as they are, we should expect the Democratic party of 2023 to be far less powerful and far more radical. The Democrats in the deepest blue districts and states will be the only ones likely to survive 2022.
Neither Manchin nor Sinema are up for reelection this year.
But Democrat AZ Senator Mark Kelly will face voters this year, and he's vulnerable because he's done everything Schumer has requested (unlike Sinema, who has had the courage to stand up to Biden and Schumer's left wing totalitarian dictates).
Kelly just came out in support of changing the filibuster that is already dead on arrival. He signed the death warrant.
What are the chances the stupid party runs McSally again or the widow McCain?
Ugh.
So 2/50= 4% of the left is not progressive. That's about right, at least for public Dems.
The Democrats in the deepest blue districts and states will be the only ones likely to survive 2022.
That's why there will be some sort of emergency that will mean delaying the midterms.
I prefer to use accurate terminology when communicating, which is why I refer to self proclaimed "progressives" as "regressives", to self proclaimed "liberals" as "left wing socialists", to self proclaimed "climate change activists" as "hypocrites", and to self proclaimed "social justice activists" as "racist historical revisionists", etc.
I think progressives use "regressives" to refer to Republicans, but maybe I'm wrong about that.
For the past hundred years, left wingers have changed the definitions of dozens/hundreds of words/terms in order to advocate left wing causes and to demonize libertarians, conservatives, freedom, capitalism, and others with whom they disagree.
While far less pervasive, Conservatives have also engaged in redefining words/terms to promote selective causes (e.g. "pro life") and denigrate those who oppose them.
ENB uses many of these redefined terms in this propaganda article above.
I became very interested in left winger's redefining of well known and understood words in order to enact radical changes in laws when they redefined the word "smoking" (in many local and state indoor workplace smoking bans that I campaigned to enact during the past 35 years) to include "vaping", which is the use of noncombustible vapor products (in order to ban vaping in workplaces).
Since vaping is 99% less harmful than cigarette smoking, since vaping emit zero smoke, and since vaping has helped ten million smokers in America to quit smoking, the left winger's campaign to ban vaping is not only unethical public health malpractice, but it also changed the definition of a word that humans have clearly understood since we lived in caves. Note that virtually all vaping bans, vapor taxes and the FDA vapor product sales ban have been championed by left wing Democrats.
At dozens of legislative hearings on vaping bans, I pointed out that if the word "smoking" can be be redefined to ban smokefree vaping, the word could similarly be redefined by city councils and state legislators to include any human activity they want to ban (including the use of smokeless tobacco, chewing gum, farting, sneezing, coughing, etc.).
Yeah I have no love of Mob mentality, but the answer to that is to reason with the mob, not to sneer at them from your private jet.
I have spent plenty of time pointing out that the current crisis to the US isn't Dems vs GOP, it is the populace vs the Elites. So maybe that makes me a populist, even if I disagree fundamentally with populists on the right who believe that immigration restrictionsm and interventions in the free market via tariff and tech-regulation are the solution to our ills. I also disagree with populists on the left like Bernie who insist our ills are caused by a lack of socialist gobbledygook.
There is no quick fix to this problem. Unlike the technocrats and sneering assholes in the priestly (aka journalist) class who think the unwashed masses need to be disdained and disregarded, I understand that we need to convince the population to look towards classical liberal values- especially including an unfettered free market.
Populism—"a political approach that strives to appeal to ordinary people who feel that their concerns are disregarded by established elite groups," according to the Oxford English Dictionary—sounds pretty good on the surface.
The definition, in the vein of the article, is exemplary of Reason-Brand 'Both Sidesism'. The definition of populism sounds pretty good on its surface but pretty much any definition of 'technocracy' contains something along the lines of:
"Technocracy—a political system that eschews the concerns of ordinary people and, instead, favors the opinions the scientific and technological elite." which doesn't even sound good on the surface. And I'm not saying that as an anti-tech Luddite, I'm saying that as someone that recognizes what constitutes 'technology' is subjective and varies widely from person to person so a deferral to the technological elite is, effectively indistinguishable from a deferral to the elite.
Ya, populist 'strongmen' who do things like ban mask mandates in their schools and other interferences from technocrats.
Cuz banning totalitarianism is totalitarianism?
Someone's being too glib to be fairly understood. How could anyone be more democratic than populists?
And juding from the bloddy and grim history of the unlimited Mob Rule which is Democracy, the only answer Populist Strong-Men deserve is: "Sorry, we're full to overflowing!"
"The idea that experts should make decisions"
First experts rarely make decisions, what experts do is advise people in authority. Those people are free to ignore the experts, but that comes at a price. The experts are more likely to be correct and then you have gone against good advice.
The fact is most people like experts. You don't go to your barber for investment advice, to the butchers for car advice or your buddy at the bar for advice on a precancerous spot on your face. There are many experts in the world because on the whole most of use prefer getting advice from experts. It is still our decision to accept the advice.
“The experts are more likely to be correct and then you have gone against good advice.”
Cite?
July 20, 1969 experts working together land two men on the moon.
When your last success story was 52 years ago, it does not speak highly.
January 27, 1967 those same experts working together resulted in the deaths of three astronauts.
April 1970 Same experts brought home three astronauts from a crippled spaceship.
I did not say experts were always right. But most of the time. If they weren't we would likely all be still living in the Stone Age.
Space shuttles Columbia and Challenger more exceptions proving the rule of experts.
I did not say experts were always right. But most of the time. If they weren't we would likely all be still living in the Stone Age.
You seem to be attempting to sound intelligent, but this is by far the stupidest thing I have read all morning. Critical thinking is what leads to the advancement of civilizations.
Again, read about Lysenko.
They used outside contractors to build all of the parts
The issue is "The idea that experts should make decisions". Not that "experts rarely make decisions". There are people who declare that they are "experts" and should be obeyed, whether they actually are or not.
There's an entire bureaucratic and managerial class who have barely learned a thing since leaving college twenty years ago, and who never actually practiced their field, who portray themselves as experts and demand obedience.
Compound that with the fact that actual experts who knows a hell of a lot about how virons operate in the body, may know fuck all about human travel patterns and social interaction.
Most people like experts. The people advising the government are not experts. They are political appointees.
The only way you will get actual experts to advise the government is to get the government out of the way. Most experts like free markets for their advice. They are not going to let political hacks like Anthony Fauci take credit for their expertise.
The completely dysfunctional relationship between Science! and government in the US rivals that of the Soviet Union under Trofim Lysenko.
Legitimate expertise is established by study in a certain specialized subjec and demonstration of that study by actual practice regarding hat subject.
"I say so" or "We say so" or "A majority says so" or "God says so" or "Strange women lying around in ponds distributing swords" does not establish expertise.
Trust in democracy seems to be directly correlated with just how noticeable it is that the population at large is dumb as a box of rocks. Then you can also add the morons who believe the election was stolen and now lament democracy. Adds up to a big number.
That isn't surprising at all.
I would guess that you have been telling the same lie that most people are stupid for so long that you have come to believe it yourself. And about yourself.
Why else would you come here and shit your metaphorical pants in front of a bunch of libertarians.
I've noticed over the years that one side has the smartest, most informed voters. They are also the ones that believe we can print limitless money with no consequence. They believe we can eliminate fossil fuels. The believed that Muller was going to put Trump in prison. They believe that grocery chains have gouged us into 7% inflation with their 1% profits. Not all of them are stupid enough to believe all of those whoppers, but way more believe that shit than are stupid deplorables.
one side
hasclaims it has the smartest, most informed votersIntelligent voters vote in their own best interest. Politics is the market for power. That market is constrained when people are convinced emotionally to vote against their own interests or fail to vote against the politician that works against their interest out of loyalty.
Serve it up, dinners. It is as unpalatable as your usual offerings.
Which election? 2020 or 2016 (or 2000, 1860, or 1700)?
A few years ago, I was talking with a guy at the local shop who was fixing my bike. He is an older middle-aged stoner who launched into this long speech about how much better China is because they “get shit done”. When I reminded him that you can be thrown in prison or worse if you say something the Chinese government doesn’t like, he kind of shrugged his shoulders and said “So?” Wonder how long he, and others who want the government to censor COVID discussions and hate speech would last in China?
Ignoring the repression, China didn't "get shit done" (outside of mass starvation) until they allowed the economy more freedom.
You were dealing with a profoundly stupid individual.
Well they did build the Great Wall
Which was actually quite ineffective, partly due to corruption.
On a trip there we were marveling at the wall, and I asked the guide how the Mongols got through.
He shrugged and said 'They bribed somebody'.
When you visit the 3 Gorges Dam, ask them how all the floodwater got through last year. The answer is probably: 'somebody got bribed'.
In just a few minutes back in 1989, Tank Man understood the world better than that guy ever had or likely ever will.
True enough, Chumby. That THC-filled mouthpiece for the CCP and the PLA needs to go talk on the QT to survivors of the SS and the KGB before talking up dictators who "get shit done."
And the fucker gives Pot a bad name to boot! #NotAllStoners
the first gen revolutionaries are always the next ones up against the wall being shot. every time.
The left still celebrates the Jacobins. My guess is they always put down the book right after Marie Antoinette gets her neck chopped.
The French, the Soviets, the Cubans, the Khmer, Iraq, the glorious revolutions always lead to the same outcome, but nobody involved ever seems to predict it. The Green Revolution or the Great Reset or whatever it is the Proggies are planning will inevitably end the same way.
Yeah, the Reds in China "got shit done" all right. They let COVID-19 spread throughout the world and murdered the Doctors who tried to spread the word and supress the contagion at the source. Fuck that Hippie Tankie!
By the way, I wouldn't trust that Stoner Commie to fix a G.I. Joe-sized bike, let alone my own.
Thanks for posting the USPS tweet containing the website to order a shipment of 4 US taxpayer funded covid tests.
Although I've read/heard several dozen reporters/commentators discussing the availability of these new tests from USPS, the reposted tweet is the first time I've seen/heard the actual website Americans must go to order the tests, which appears to give special preference to twitterheads and experienced Internet users (unless USPS is going to mail a notice about the free covid tests with the website to go to order the tests).
I just ordered a shipment, not because I feel any symptoms, but rather because it takes up to ten days to receive the covid tests, which renders the test totally useless to everyone who waits until they have symptoms to order the tests (as the virus will be gone by then, and nobody will know whether they actually had the virus ten days prior, or know if they have the important immunity that the virus confers to those infected).
In sum, I urge everyone to go to the website at
https://special.usps.com/testkits
and order a shipment of four covid tests, which can be used in the future whenever you or a family member desire to take a test (e.g. if/when symptoms are present or if/when proof of a negative covid test is necessary to gain access to an event/business).
Nah.
I don't actually plan to ever use the free covid tests (but may change my mind if I get really sick, or perhaps if a negative covid test is required to get into a future concert, game, etc.).
But if I do take a test, and test positive, I won't report the results to my doctor (at least until next year after the GOP takes control of the US House) as doctors are required to report positive test results to the local Health Dept, which reports it to the CDC, none of whom can be trusted after they lied about covid daily for the past 22 months and continue to do so).
Wonder if the covid tests can detect covid in cats, hamsters or other pets. Don't know if veterinarians are similarly required to report positive covid tests in pets/animals, and don't know if CDC or local Health Depts might respond like the Chinese Government in Hong Kong (which just killed 2,000 hamsters and other animals at a pet store because several tested positive for covid).
How much is the resale value ?- I'd like a few of my tax dollars back
I'd like a few of my tax dollars back
They always fuck you on the 'shipping and handling'.
And they fuck you at the drive-thru!
https://youtu.be/V66XdulPrBM
Re technocrats running the show, people need to understand that while science can inform about some quantifiable details in life, that sort of absolute certainty is quite limited, and generally insufficient to look at the overall societal effects of state actions.
As the physicians (used to be???) reminded, a good general principal is always "First, do no harm".
Hubris kills.
Mob Rule or Rule by a Technocratic Elite? Where's Just Leave us the Hell Alone?
We are the mob.
I'm here with you! Libertarian is when we choose to leave each other the Hell alone together! And if we're left the Hell alone together and choose to raise Hell together, that's cool too!
Faith in illiberal, "populist" strongmen may be declining.
you're right, biden's poll numbers are terrible.
Democrats: requiring ID to vote is racist but requiring ID to eat in a restaurant or visit a gym is protecting the Republic.
If only this level of cognitive dissonance were peak Progtard.
Grocery stores and gas stations are next on the list. Some progressives would support allowing the unvaccinated out into public if they would pay a penaltax.
Is a penaltax anything like a bird cage or a humbler, only with a coin-activated lock to be released?
"Younger survey respondents are disproportionately responsible for the illiberal value shift—with a much larger change among respondents aged below 35 than those aged 55 and above," notes the Cambridge report:
No shit? That's unexpected.
What do you expect from the “live in mom’s basement” generation? If you have been protected from icky feelings had everything done for you in life, you will expect government to do the same
"Hitler Yutes" as Mussolini would have called them.
https://youtu.be/K6qGwmXZtsE
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments yesterday in a religious freedom case out of Boston, where the city has refused to fly a Christian flag at city hall despite flying many other kinds of flags there.
now do a BLM flag... lol
Or an LGBTQWTFBBQ one.
The only flag I would want Boston to fly is a City of Boston flag outside of City Limits, so I'll know where to turn around.
By the way, the so-called "Christian Flag" is typically a Protestant symbol used in Protestant Churches in the U.S. It was and is also flown with both the United States Flag and the Confederate Flag at Ku Klux Klan rallies.
Private individuals who want the (Protestant] Christian Flag have the right to have it, and the same goes with BLM, Confederate, LGBTQ+ and other flags too, but Governments that are supposed to represent all citizens equally should avoid all flags other than official Government flags.
Well there's been shitloads of Christian flags, but the flag they want to fly is "a ecumenical flag designed in the early 20th century to represent much of Christianity and Christendom.[1] Since its adoption by the United States Federal Council of Churches in 1942, it has been used by congregations of many Christian traditions,[2][1] including Anglican,[3][4] Baptist,[5] Congregationalist,[6][7] Lutheran,[8] Mennonite,[9] Methodist,[2][10] Moravian,[11] Presbyterian,[12] and Reformed, among others."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_Flag
Hardly a Klan flag, as many Black denominations have also flown it.
In fact, "during World War II the flag was flown along with the U.S. flag in a number of Lutheran churches, many of them with German backgrounds, who wanted to show their solidarity with the United States during the war against Nazi Germany.[28]"
HTML fail. There's two different links there.
True, it wasn't exclusively a Klan flag, but still used by them nevertheless, a problem that comes when something is Copyright-free and Trademark-free.
In any event, Boston is not "Boston Strong" on Secular Government when it flies that flag. Churches and private homes have a right to fly it, but not Governments on any level in a free society.
https://twitter.com/Mediaite/status/1483812823654453248?t=dHT3QB_9jO1TmSm5uxeRaQ&s=19
NEW POLL: More Than a Third of the Country Gives Biden an 'F' for His First Year in Office, Just 11 Percent Give Him an 'A'
[Link]
How many of those "A" givers work here do you suppose?
You have to assume the entire staff gives him at least a B-
I assumed he meant the fifty centers.
Sarc, Jeff, Mike, Shrike, Overt...
Rasperry Beret, Tony, Joey Sunday
and the 11 percent would support putting you in a camp for being unvaccinated, and taking your kids away for not vaccinating them. It's shocking that ANYONE would think this way but I'm glad it's only 11 percent or so. The ven diagram of those people crossed with those who are too afraid to own a gun is likely very reassuring.
"11 percent would support putting you in a camp for being unvaccinated"
48% of Democrats according to Ramussen.
Faith in illiberal, "populist" strongmen may be declining.
Populist leaders are no more strongmen than government insiders are. Putin was KGB, Lukashenko and Xi were bureaucrats.
Narendra Modi and Viktor Orbán get called strongmen, but aside from being in the LGBTQ black books for calling transgenderism nonsense and publicly fighting with George Soros, they haven't really done any "strongman" stuff.
Populists by definition cater to the wishes of the people, you know "vox populi" and all that. They used to call that "democracy". But now they gentry class thinks that's bad.
You're supposed to obey them.
“and publicly fighting with George Soros”
Ding ding ding.
Orban is wanting to impose price controls on top of his anti-LGBTQ+ words and deeds , so that's pretty strong-manny in my book.
Stupider than hell, but far, far, far less strong-manny than mandating mRNA jabs with the threat of prison or outlawry like many of his other European presidential colleagues are doing.
Well, the people of Hungary won't have to worry about either COVID-19 or vaccination if they die of starvation, which is the way that price controls leads.
https://twitter.com/TulsiGabbard/status/1483765584458309634?t=SaQ4RN_IKDH92RWZtBs5ug&s=19
Instead of trying to be “woke”/politically correct and targeting parents who care about what schools are teaching their children, the FBI/Dept of Homeland Security should focus on actual threats like the jihadist who terrorized the Texas synagogue.
but that was their guy, so... :shrug:
British national. The the synagogue was just an accidental happenstance. It was just nearby. Had it been a grocery store, we'd be reading, "British National Attacks Texas Kroger"
https://twitter.com/bridgietherease/status/1483675469169844224?t=1V2zj0zHuDVwZ_j4Kxkvkw&s=19
they're going to pivot from rona to war like nothing even happened. Eric Feigl-Ding just posting 24/7 about The Russian Menace
So can we round up all the people who don't think Democracy is a good form of government and send them somewhere where there's no Democracy?
Hey. We're just giving them what they want.
Representative Bogart (D - La)
Poignant passage from story about how neurodevelopmental scores of infants born during the pandemic is two standards deviations lower than prior cohorts includes the highlighted pious incantation https://t.co/rcQpqujC4G
Joe Biden has achieved his biggest policy victory (and campaign promise) as the price of worldwide crude oil just reached a 7 year high of $88/barrel, which is expected to surpass $100/barrel.
https://www.barrons.com/articles/crude-oil-prices-7-year-highs-51642502792
But of course, nobody in Biden's administration or its army of left wing media propagandists are honest or courageous enough to claim the price hike as a policy victory (as Biden promised to sharply reduce oil, gas and other carbon use/emissions in the US during his presidential campaign and since then).
As one who campaigned for the past 40 years to sharply reduce cigarette consumption in the US (by advocating cigarette price hikes to $5/pack, and then $10/pack via litigation and taxation),
it was obvious to me (and any other economically astute observer) that the most effective way to sharply and quickly reduce carbon emissions from coal, oil or natural gas is to sharply increase prices.
Biden achieved his so-called environmental goal of increasing the price of oil and gas by banning the Keystone pipeline, delaying/blocking other pipelines, further restricting oil and gas drilling and fracking, and demanding sharp reductions in future carbon emissions (which benefit Russia, China, Iran and other adversaries, while harming most Americans).
https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharysmith/2022/01/18/error-leaves-some-people-unable-to-order-covid-tests-from-white-houses-new-website/?sh=2ef09b55370d
"Error Leaves Some People Unable To Order Covid Tests From White House’s New Website"
Only the federal government could find a way to fuck up "ship small boxes to people who ask for them".
LOL
They didn't fuck up the delivery. They didn't even fuck up holding an order. They fucked up 'May I take your order?'
When are midterms again?
Progressives would like to abort midterm.
Jasa pasang kanopi terbaik https://jasapemasangancanopybandung.com/tukang-kanopi-bsd-tangerang-terbaik-cek-dulu/