Reason.com - Free Minds and Free Markets
Reason logo Reason logo
  • Latest
  • Magazine
    • Current Issue
    • Archives
    • Subscribe
    • Crossword
  • Video
  • Podcasts
    • All Shows
    • The Reason Roundtable
    • The Reason Interview With Nick Gillespie
    • The Soho Forum Debates
    • Just Asking Questions
    • The Best of Reason Magazine
    • Why We Can't Have Nice Things
  • Volokh
  • Newsletters
  • Donate
    • Donate Online
    • Donate Crypto
    • Ways To Give To Reason Foundation
    • Torchbearer Society
    • Planned Giving
  • Subscribe
    • Reason Plus Subscription
    • Print Subscription
    • Gift Subscriptions
    • Subscriber Support

Login Form

Create new account
Forgot password

Encryption

The U.K. Government's Latest Encryption Fearmongering Relies on Child Sex-Trafficking Panics

British police want greater surveillance powers and they’re willing to destroy everybody’s cybersecurity to get them.

Scott Shackford | 1.18.2022 2:10 PM

Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests
kidwithphone_1161x653 | Samwordley / Dreamstime.com
(Samwordley / Dreamstime.com)

The British government hopes to use parents' fears of child predators in a new marketing campaign designed to undermine end-to-end encryption.

Rolling Stone writer James Ball broke the news on Saturday, reporting that the United Kingdom's Home Office (the British equivalent of America's Department of Justice) was planning "a multi-pronged publicity attack." That attack launched today with the Home Office announcing its partnership with various charities in a "No Place to Hide" campaign that will "urge social media tech companies to put children's safety first on their platforms."

"Right now," an ad for the "No Place to Hide Campaign" asserts, "some social media companies can detect online child sexual abuse and report it to law enforcement. But some companies plan to introduce end-to-end encryption, which will make this much harder."

End-to-end encryption is a form of tech security that prevents anyone but the sender and recipient of electronic communications from seeing the information that is being transmitted. This prevents third parties from discerning the content of communications or messages.

End-to-end encryption protects both individuals and institutions from having important or sensitive information intercepted by outsiders, particularly hackers with malicious intent. It is a vital tool that allows us to protect ourselves.

By its nature, such encryption also makes secret surveillance by police more difficult, which is why so many governments around the world would gladly shut it down. The United Kingdom has attacked end-to-end encryption for years now, as have Australia, the United States, and other countries.

Cybersecurity experts almost uniformly agree that compromising end-to-end encryption to give government officials "back doors" to bypass it would weaken everybody's privacy and thus increase crime. Nevertheless, government officials deliberately ignore or downplay such risks in the hopes of convincing the public that weakening encryption is for the public's own good.

According to Rolling Stone's reporting, the British Home Office is specifically hoping to use fears about child predators as a way to turn public sentiment against Facebook's plans to add end-to-end encryption to its popular Messenger app. The Home Office reportedly has a budget of 534,000 pounds (about $725,000) for its anti-encryption marketing campaign.

Rolling Stone also reports:

The plans include a media blitz, campaign efforts from UK charities and law enforcement agencies, calls to action for the public to contact tech companies directly, and multiple real-world stunts—some designed to make the public "uneasy."…

One key slide notes that "most of the public have never heard" of end-to-end encryption—adding that this means "people can be easily swayed" on the issue. The same slide notes that the campaign "must not start a privacy vs. safety debate."

That last observation is particularly telling. Plain old fearmongering is clearly a central part of this latest campaign against end-to-end encryption. According to Rolling Stone, one proposed ad would put a child and an adult (both actors) in a plastic box with the adult looking "knowingly" at the child, suggesting predatory behavior. It's a campaign designed to reach the sort of already hysterical people who see non-existent sex-traffickers everywhere they go.

Tech and privacy activist organizations are already pushing back. Open Rights Group, a U.K.-based outfit devoted to protecting privacy and free speech online, has put together a counter-advertisement noting how much criminals will love the British government's plans to weaken encryption.

"If apps like Signal and WhatsApp break encryption to read your messages," the Open Rights Group warns in its ad, "it will be possible for cyber criminals, hackers, and foreign governments to read them, too."

Start your day with Reason. Get a daily brief of the most important stories and trends every weekday morning when you subscribe to Reason Roundup.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

NEXT: Citing Debunked CDC Research, Virginia School Districts Vow To Defy Youngkin on Mask Mandates

Scott Shackford is a policy research editor at Reason Foundation.

EncryptionUnited KingdomChildrenPrivacyPanicMoral PanicSex Trafficking
Share on FacebookShare on XShare on RedditShare by emailPrint friendly versionCopy page URL
Media Contact & Reprint Requests

Hide Comments (42)

Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.

  1. JasonAZ   3 years ago

    Government using panic/fear to gain control? This is my shocked face.

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

      It's always sob-sob funny when statists find government doing things they don't like, and watching them contort themselves to blame it on the wrong people in charge. How many of those Open Rights Groups staff and supporters think government is just fine otherwise?

      1. Donna F. Krone   3 years ago

        Working Online from home and earns more than $15k every month. I have received $17365 last month by doing online work from home. Its an easy and simple job to do from home and even a little child can do this online and makes money. Everybody can get this job now and earns more dollars online by just copy and paste this website in browser and then follow instructions to get started right now. ═══►►► CLICK NOW

  2. Roberta   3 years ago

    TL;DR (yet), but does the argument amount to an assertion that nobody should be allowed to keep secrets, because people might keep bad secrets?

    1. Á àß äẞç ãþÇđ âÞ¢Đæ ǎB€Ðëf ảhf   3 years ago

      It's the old give-government-your-front-door-keys if you have nothing to hide, but I-don't-have-to-because-I-am-wlite.

      The Prince Andrew Bill Clinton gang.

      1. Eeyore   3 years ago

        But aren't those elites the suspected pedos?

        1. Dillinger   3 years ago

          suspected?

          1. Eeyore   3 years ago

            Not convicted.

          2. GraceMcKinney   3 years ago

            I am creating an honest wage from home 1900 Dollars/week , that is wonderful, below a year gone i used to be unemployed during an atrocious economy. (cfg28) I convey God on a daily basis. I used to be endowed with these directions and currently it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with everybody.

            Here is where I started…..... Visit Here

        2. VULGAR MADMAN   3 years ago

          There’s nothing elite about buttplug or sarcasmic.

      2. MegMay   3 years ago

        Start your work at home right now. Spend more time with your family and earn. Start bringing 85$/¬¬¬hr. just on a laptop. Very easy way to make your life happy and earning continuously. Last week my check was 24551$.pop over here this site…

        ……… Click Here

    2. Chumby   3 years ago

      Reason chose not to have the kiddie porn poster here reported to authorities.

    3. Hank Phillips   3 years ago

      Bad? By what standard?

  3. Ken Shultz   3 years ago

    "If apps like Signal and WhatsApp break encryption to read your messages," the Open Rights Group warns in its ad, "it will be possible for cyber criminals, hackers, and foreign governments to read them, too."

    My understanding is that the only thing the government can get from Signal is the day an account was opened and the last time the account was accessed.

    "The broad set of personal information that is typically easy to retrieve in other apps simply doesn't exist on Signal's servers. The subpoena requested a wide variety of information that fell into this nonexistent category, including the addresses of the users, their correspondence, and the name associated with each account.

    Just like last time, we couldn't provide any of that. It's impossible to turn over data that we never had access to in the first place. Signal doesn't have access to your messages; your chat list; your groups; your contacts; your stickers; your profile name or avatar; or even the GIFs you search for. As a result, our response to the subpoena will look familiar. It's the same set of "Account and Subscriber Information" that we provided in 2016: Unix timestamps for when each account was created and the date that each account last connected to the Signal service.

    That's it.

    ----Signal to Homeland Security

    https://boingboing.net/2021/04/29/signals-response-to-fbis-grand-jury-subpoena-for-user-data-you-get-nothing-you-lose-good-day-sir.html

    There is nothing on the servers for Signal to give to the government. It is an ex-parrot. No room in the inn. The government issuing a subpoena to Signal is like Geraldo Rivera revealing the contents of Al Capon'e vault--there's nothing there. If Signal gave the government a backdoor, it would be a backdoor to nothing. Signal does not have access to the encryption keys. The encryption and decryption are done locally.

    I understand that no form of communication is entirely secure. I believe that Signal is about as secure as any consumer application can be--or needs to be. There may be a time when that changes in the future, but for now, it's about as good as it gets. And the more people use it, the better. I would never say that all real libertarians use Signal for their text messages, one on one video conferencing, and voice calls. I might think it, but I would never say it.

    1. Eeyore   3 years ago

      It simplifies a bunch of things. Every government will want to have the company implement custom rules just for them. It gets onerous.

  4. mad.casual   3 years ago

    According to Rolling Stone, one proposed ad would put a child and an adult (both actors) in a plastic box with the adult looking "knowingly" at the child, suggesting predatory behavior.

    Also suggesting current Good COVID Practices.

  5. Dillinger   3 years ago

    can't wait for the Brits to stop being sad about how they once ran the world but now are a joke.

    1. Chumby   3 years ago

      At least they still lead the world in dentistry.

      1. Its_Not_Inevitable   3 years ago

        And culinary exploits.

      2. Dillinger   3 years ago

        "let's have a look at the Big Book of British Smiles"

  6. Chumby   3 years ago

    Pluggo is worried. He might get UK exposure for his upcoming Ped Talks series.

  7. raspberrydinners   3 years ago

    All it will take is leaking some politicians' data for them to do an about face.

    One would hope the British public is smart enough to see through this bs but who knows.

  8. Longtobefree   3 years ago

    Well, at least in the USA we have the bill of rights.
    I mean, "they" would never require all social media users to provide their full legal name, a complete set of fingerprints, home address, submit to a background check, take hours of "approved" training, and carry a permit at all times that allows them to post comments.
    Right?
    Equal protection and all that jazz.
    Right?
    On the other hand - - - - - - - -

  9. I, Woodchipper   3 years ago

    Hint: they don't want to do this just so they can get sex traffickers. In fact, they have no interest in the sex traffickers.

  10. Spiritus Mundi   3 years ago

    This from a country that does nothing to stop the numerous mulsim asian rape grooming gangs. Oh wait, they don't do nothing. They put people who expose them in jail for islamophobia.

  11. BrianCF   3 years ago

    Was Benny Hill consulted?

  12. atisang   3 years ago

    https://atisang.com/blog/Persian-Newsletter/P303-gray_stons.html
    https://atisang.com/blog/Persian-Newsletter/P302-attractive-suggestions-for-choosing-a-cabinet-stone.html
    gray stone

  13. atisang   3 years ago

    https://atisang.com/blog/Persian-Newsletter/P308-Where-to-buy-slab-stone.html
    https://atisang.com/blog/Persian-Newsletter/P306-export.html
    slab stone

  14. atisang   3 years ago

    https://b2n.ir/m39488
    https://b2n.ir/t91812

  15. atisang   3 years ago

    https://b2n.ir/t46186
    https://b2n.ir/h07263
    kavir sabz stone

  16. atisang   3 years ago

    https://b2n.ir/d71987
    https://b2n.ir/a59071
    marble fuion

  17. atisang   3 years ago

    https://atisang.com/shop/3269-night-marble/
    https://b2n.ir/m74650
    night marble stone

  18. atisang   3 years ago

    https://b2n.ir/m54371
    https://b2n.ir/759577
    marble stone

  19. atisang   3 years ago

    https://b2n.ir/s19365
    https://b2n.ir/759577
    step stone marble

  20. atisang   3 years ago

    https://b2n.ir/b96510
    https://atisang.com/crystal
    crystal stone

  21. atisang   3 years ago

    https://atisang.com/onyx-stone
    https://b2n.ir/r95360
    onyx stone

  22. atisang   3 years ago

    https://atisang.com/Granite/
    https://atisang.com/building-stone/
    granite stone

  23. atisang   3 years ago

    https://atisang.com/blog/marble/P169-%D8%B3%D9%86%DA%AF-%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D8%B7%D8%A8%DB%8C%D8%B9%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87-%D8%A2%D8%B4%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%A8%D8%AA-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%B3%D9%86%DA%AF-%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D9%85%D8%B5%D9%86%D9%88%D8%B9%DB%8C.html
    https://atisang.com/article/slab/
    slab stone

  24. atisang   3 years ago

    https://b2n.ir/759577
    https://atisang.com/shop/3269-night-marble/
    marble stone

  25. atisang   3 years ago

    https://b2n.ir/759577
    marble
    https://b2n.ir/m74650
    stone

  26. mtrueman   3 years ago

    This is the one thing we didn't want to happen.
    https://www.reddit.com/r/InterdimensionalCable/comments/lz15jc/brass_eye_paedophile_blasted_into_space/

  27. Hank Phillips   3 years ago

    Minors are the first to realize they can take advantage of Qualified Immunity to more easily break laws. Remember Orkut? Enterprising child prostitutes all over South America glommed onto that as a way to cut out the middleman and reach customers directly--or simply revel in premature pleasure and plant leaves. The whole platform was finally dismantled after all forms of violence, intimidation and wheedling failed to make "that" go away.

Please log in to post comments

Mute this user?

  • Mute User
  • Cancel

Ban this user?

  • Ban User
  • Cancel

Un-ban this user?

  • Un-ban User
  • Cancel

Nuke this user?

  • Nuke User
  • Cancel

Un-nuke this user?

  • Un-nuke User
  • Cancel

Flag this comment?

  • Flag Comment
  • Cancel

Un-flag this comment?

  • Un-flag Comment
  • Cancel

Latest

'Banal Horror': Asylum Case Deals Trump Yet Another Loss on Due Process

Billy Binion | 5.29.2025 5:27 PM

Supreme Court Unanimously Agrees To Curb Environmental Red Tape That Slows Down Construction Projects

Jeff Luse | 5.29.2025 3:31 PM

What To Expect Now That Trump Has Scrapped Biden's Crippling AI Regulations

Jack Nicastro | 5.29.2025 3:16 PM

Original Sin, the Biden Cover-Up Book, Is Better Late Than Never

Robby Soave | 5.29.2025 2:23 PM

Did 'Activist Judges' Derail Trump's Tariffs?

Eric Boehm | 5.29.2025 2:05 PM

Recommended

  • About
  • Browse Topics
  • Events
  • Staff
  • Jobs
  • Donate
  • Advertise
  • Subscribe
  • Contact
  • Media
  • Shop
  • Amazon
Reason Facebook@reason on XReason InstagramReason TikTokReason YoutubeApple PodcastsReason on FlipboardReason RSS

© 2024 Reason Foundation | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

r

Do you care about free minds and free markets? Sign up to get the biggest stories from Reason in your inbox every afternoon.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

This modal will close in 10

Reason Plus

Special Offer!

  • Full digital edition access
  • No ads
  • Commenting privileges

Just $25 per year

Join Today!