The U.K. Government's Latest Encryption Fearmongering Relies on Child Sex-Trafficking Panics
British police want greater surveillance powers and they’re willing to destroy everybody’s cybersecurity to get them.

The British government hopes to use parents' fears of child predators in a new marketing campaign designed to undermine end-to-end encryption.
Rolling Stone writer James Ball broke the news on Saturday, reporting that the United Kingdom's Home Office (the British equivalent of America's Department of Justice) was planning "a multi-pronged publicity attack." That attack launched today with the Home Office announcing its partnership with various charities in a "No Place to Hide" campaign that will "urge social media tech companies to put children's safety first on their platforms."
"Right now," an ad for the "No Place to Hide Campaign" asserts, "some social media companies can detect online child sexual abuse and report it to law enforcement. But some companies plan to introduce end-to-end encryption, which will make this much harder."
End-to-end encryption is a form of tech security that prevents anyone but the sender and recipient of electronic communications from seeing the information that is being transmitted. This prevents third parties from discerning the content of communications or messages.
End-to-end encryption protects both individuals and institutions from having important or sensitive information intercepted by outsiders, particularly hackers with malicious intent. It is a vital tool that allows us to protect ourselves.
By its nature, such encryption also makes secret surveillance by police more difficult, which is why so many governments around the world would gladly shut it down. The United Kingdom has attacked end-to-end encryption for years now, as have Australia, the United States, and other countries.
Cybersecurity experts almost uniformly agree that compromising end-to-end encryption to give government officials "back doors" to bypass it would weaken everybody's privacy and thus increase crime. Nevertheless, government officials deliberately ignore or downplay such risks in the hopes of convincing the public that weakening encryption is for the public's own good.
According to Rolling Stone's reporting, the British Home Office is specifically hoping to use fears about child predators as a way to turn public sentiment against Facebook's plans to add end-to-end encryption to its popular Messenger app. The Home Office reportedly has a budget of 534,000 pounds (about $725,000) for its anti-encryption marketing campaign.
Rolling Stone also reports:
The plans include a media blitz, campaign efforts from UK charities and law enforcement agencies, calls to action for the public to contact tech companies directly, and multiple real-world stunts—some designed to make the public "uneasy."…
One key slide notes that "most of the public have never heard" of end-to-end encryption—adding that this means "people can be easily swayed" on the issue. The same slide notes that the campaign "must not start a privacy vs. safety debate."
That last observation is particularly telling. Plain old fearmongering is clearly a central part of this latest campaign against end-to-end encryption. According to Rolling Stone, one proposed ad would put a child and an adult (both actors) in a plastic box with the adult looking "knowingly" at the child, suggesting predatory behavior. It's a campaign designed to reach the sort of already hysterical people who see non-existent sex-traffickers everywhere they go.
Tech and privacy activist organizations are already pushing back. Open Rights Group, a U.K.-based outfit devoted to protecting privacy and free speech online, has put together a counter-advertisement noting how much criminals will love the British government's plans to weaken encryption.
"If apps like Signal and WhatsApp break encryption to read your messages," the Open Rights Group warns in its ad, "it will be possible for cyber criminals, hackers, and foreign governments to read them, too."
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Government using panic/fear to gain control? This is my shocked face.
It's always sob-sob funny when statists find government doing things they don't like, and watching them contort themselves to blame it on the wrong people in charge. How many of those Open Rights Groups staff and supporters think government is just fine otherwise?
Working Online from home and earns more than $15k every month. I have received $17365 last month by doing online work from home. Its an easy and simple job to do from home and even a little child can do this online and makes money. Everybody can get this job now and earns more dollars online by just copy and paste this website in browser and then follow instructions to get started right now. ═══►►► CLICK NOW
TL;DR (yet), but does the argument amount to an assertion that nobody should be allowed to keep secrets, because people might keep bad secrets?
It's the old give-government-your-front-door-keys if you have nothing to hide, but I-don't-have-to-because-I-am-wlite.
The Prince Andrew Bill Clinton gang.
But aren't those elites the suspected pedos?
suspected?
Not convicted.
I am creating an honest wage from home 1900 Dollars/week , that is wonderful, below a year gone i used to be unemployed during an atrocious economy. (cfg28) I convey God on a daily basis. I used to be endowed with these directions and currently it’s my duty to pay it forward and share it with everybody.
Here is where I started…..... Visit Here
There’s nothing elite about buttplug or sarcasmic.
Start your work at home right now. Spend more time with your family and earn. Start bringing 85$/¬¬¬hr. just on a laptop. Very easy way to make your life happy and earning continuously. Last week my check was 24551$.pop over here this site…
……… Click Here
Reason chose not to have the kiddie porn poster here reported to authorities.
Bad? By what standard?
"If apps like Signal and WhatsApp break encryption to read your messages," the Open Rights Group warns in its ad, "it will be possible for cyber criminals, hackers, and foreign governments to read them, too."
My understanding is that the only thing the government can get from Signal is the day an account was opened and the last time the account was accessed.
"The broad set of personal information that is typically easy to retrieve in other apps simply doesn't exist on Signal's servers. The subpoena requested a wide variety of information that fell into this nonexistent category, including the addresses of the users, their correspondence, and the name associated with each account.
Just like last time, we couldn't provide any of that. It's impossible to turn over data that we never had access to in the first place. Signal doesn't have access to your messages; your chat list; your groups; your contacts; your stickers; your profile name or avatar; or even the GIFs you search for. As a result, our response to the subpoena will look familiar. It's the same set of "Account and Subscriber Information" that we provided in 2016: Unix timestamps for when each account was created and the date that each account last connected to the Signal service.
That's it.
----Signal to Homeland Security
https://boingboing.net/2021/04/29/signals-response-to-fbis-grand-jury-subpoena-for-user-data-you-get-nothing-you-lose-good-day-sir.html
There is nothing on the servers for Signal to give to the government. It is an ex-parrot. No room in the inn. The government issuing a subpoena to Signal is like Geraldo Rivera revealing the contents of Al Capon'e vault--there's nothing there. If Signal gave the government a backdoor, it would be a backdoor to nothing. Signal does not have access to the encryption keys. The encryption and decryption are done locally.
I understand that no form of communication is entirely secure. I believe that Signal is about as secure as any consumer application can be--or needs to be. There may be a time when that changes in the future, but for now, it's about as good as it gets. And the more people use it, the better. I would never say that all real libertarians use Signal for their text messages, one on one video conferencing, and voice calls. I might think it, but I would never say it.
It simplifies a bunch of things. Every government will want to have the company implement custom rules just for them. It gets onerous.
According to Rolling Stone, one proposed ad would put a child and an adult (both actors) in a plastic box with the adult looking "knowingly" at the child, suggesting predatory behavior.
Also suggesting current Good COVID Practices.
can't wait for the Brits to stop being sad about how they once ran the world but now are a joke.
At least they still lead the world in dentistry.
And culinary exploits.
"let's have a look at the Big Book of British Smiles"
Pluggo is worried. He might get UK exposure for his upcoming Ped Talks series.
All it will take is leaking some politicians' data for them to do an about face.
One would hope the British public is smart enough to see through this bs but who knows.
Well, at least in the USA we have the bill of rights.
I mean, "they" would never require all social media users to provide their full legal name, a complete set of fingerprints, home address, submit to a background check, take hours of "approved" training, and carry a permit at all times that allows them to post comments.
Right?
Equal protection and all that jazz.
Right?
On the other hand - - - - - - - -
Hint: they don't want to do this just so they can get sex traffickers. In fact, they have no interest in the sex traffickers.
This from a country that does nothing to stop the numerous
mulsimasianrapegrooming gangs. Oh wait, they don't do nothing. They put people who expose them in jail for islamophobia.Was Benny Hill consulted?
https://atisang.com/blog/Persian-Newsletter/P303-gray_stons.html
https://atisang.com/blog/Persian-Newsletter/P302-attractive-suggestions-for-choosing-a-cabinet-stone.html
gray stone
https://atisang.com/blog/Persian-Newsletter/P308-Where-to-buy-slab-stone.html
https://atisang.com/blog/Persian-Newsletter/P306-export.html
slab stone
https://b2n.ir/m39488
https://b2n.ir/t91812
https://b2n.ir/t46186
https://b2n.ir/h07263
kavir sabz stone
https://b2n.ir/d71987
https://b2n.ir/a59071
marble fuion
https://atisang.com/shop/3269-night-marble/
https://b2n.ir/m74650
night marble stone
https://b2n.ir/m54371
https://b2n.ir/759577
marble stone
https://b2n.ir/s19365
https://b2n.ir/759577
step stone marble
https://b2n.ir/b96510
https://atisang.com/crystal
crystal stone
https://atisang.com/onyx-stone
https://b2n.ir/r95360
onyx stone
https://atisang.com/Granite/
https://atisang.com/building-stone/
granite stone
https://atisang.com/blog/marble/P169-%D8%B3%D9%86%DA%AF-%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D8%B7%D8%A8%DB%8C%D8%B9%DB%8C-%D8%A8%D8%B1%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87-%D8%A2%D8%B4%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D9%86%D8%B3%D8%A8%D8%AA-%D8%A8%D9%87-%D8%B3%D9%86%DA%AF-%D9%85%D8%B1%D9%85%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D9%85%D8%B5%D9%86%D9%88%D8%B9%DB%8C.html
https://atisang.com/article/slab/
slab stone
https://b2n.ir/759577
https://atisang.com/shop/3269-night-marble/
marble stone
https://b2n.ir/759577
marble
https://b2n.ir/m74650
stone
This is the one thing we didn't want to happen.
https://www.reddit.com/r/InterdimensionalCable/comments/lz15jc/brass_eye_paedophile_blasted_into_space/
Minors are the first to realize they can take advantage of Qualified Immunity to more easily break laws. Remember Orkut? Enterprising child prostitutes all over South America glommed onto that as a way to cut out the middleman and reach customers directly--or simply revel in premature pleasure and plant leaves. The whole platform was finally dismantled after all forms of violence, intimidation and wheedling failed to make "that" go away.