Inflation Hits Highest Level Since 1982
Plus: Evidence that redistricting reforms are working to prevent extreme gerrymandering, what Squid Game has to say about communism, and more...

Prices are rising faster than they have in nearly 40 years, as year-over-year inflation hit 6.8 percent in November.
Government data released Friday morning show the highest rate of inflation since 1982, and prices seem to be accelerating rather than cooling off or proving to be "transitory." November is the sixth consecutive month in which prices have been more than 5 percent higher than they were a year ago.
Inflation is hitting just about every category of consumer spending, but some areas are notably worse than 2020 levels. Energy prices are up 33 percent since last year, and prices for used cars continue to soar—31 percent higher than a year ago. Prices for food and clothing have increased by about 6 percent and 5 percent, respectively.
Wow.
It's pretty wild that "food at home" (aka groceries) is now seeing faster price increases (6.4% in past year) than "food away" (aka restaurants, where prices are up 5.8% in past year) pic.twitter.com/c6yBSBekVS
— Heather Long (@byHeatherLong) December 10, 2021
Those rising prices are rippling through every part of the economy. A survey conducted by The Wall Street Journal last month found that 60 percent of small-business owners had increased prices in the past 90 days, while 80 percent reported increasing labor costs and 72 percent said their suppliers had increased prices.
"Fed officials have become increasingly concerned about price increases—both because the uptick has lasted longer than expected and because it shows signs of broadening to areas less affected by the pandemic," The New York Times reports.
Jerome Powell, chair of the Federal Reserve, warned last week that "the risk of higher inflation has increased." He also signaled that the central bank could begin raising interest rates in the coming months if inflation continues unabated. Friday's news will likely put more pressure on the Federal Reserve to do exactly that—because higher interest rates encourage saving and help cool off inflation.
It turns out to be much easier to dump trillions of dollars into the economy than it is to control what happens after you do.
Inflation is always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon. If there is too much cash chasing too few goods, prices will rise. https://t.co/KEu6UvdEeZ
— Megan McArdle (@asymmetricinfo) December 10, 2021
Despite the ridiculous talking points being pushed by some political commentators, there is no objective reason to believe that inflation is more of a problem for the wealthy. Indeed, rising prices for food, fuel, rent, and other basic necessities are already squeezing working-class Americans' budgets and will continue to do that.
And it probably means the end of 99-cent slices of pizza too.
FREE MINDS
More evidence that redistricting reforms implemented during the past decade are working to limit the most extreme forms of partisan gerrymandering:
By our estimate, neutral/commission maps in the blue states of CA, CO, NJ, VA and WA (93 seats total) will end up costing Dems 10-15 House seats they could have seized by gerrymandering, making Republicans even stronger favorites for House control. https://t.co/B6pIvVChXf
— Dave Wasserman (@Redistrict) December 9, 2021
Wasserman's tweet makes it sound like those reforms are specifically harming Democrats, but that's only half true. The changes in states like California and Virginia were implemented to limit gerrymandering by both parties. It just so happens that Democrats are trying to do it in a lot of places this time around.
FREE MARKETS
Mega-hit Netflix show Squid Game is commonly seen as a devastating commentary on modern capitalism. But the show actually has more to say about the problems of communism, argues Reason's Zach Weissmueller:
QUICK HITS
• Congress held yet another performative hearing about Big Tech and it went about the way you'd expect:
19/ Greenblatt: "platforms are engaging in "incitement by algorithm."
What? Ok but that is not how it works.
— Ari Cohn (@AriCohn) December 9, 2021
• Actor Jussie Smollett was convicted of falsely reporting a hate crime, hopefully bringing an end to one of the dumbest legal sagas in American history.
• Great Britain is bracing for a rough winter as the omicron variant threatens to shutter parts of the economy.
• After encouraging restaurants to open up outdoor dining space, San Francisco is rolling out 60 pages of new rules for renewing those permits:
You: a struggling restaurant owner who wants to offer outdoor dining to customers amid an ongoing pandemic.
The city of San Francisco: https://t.co/spGR4sklvU pic.twitter.com/DZpOWEsbZ2
— Conor Friedersdorf (@conor64) December 7, 2021
• A few decades after banning families from having multiple kids, China is now banning vasectomies in the hopes of raising birth rates.
• WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is one step closer to being extradited to the United States.
• Weekend read: The New Yorker's profile of Enes Kanter Freedom, the Boston Celtics center who has become the sports world's most outspoken China critic.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
Fuck Joe Biden
Fuck Joe Biden
You first.
There's a big difference between an invocation and a personal plan.
You want sloppy Brandon seconds ?
Would that be a sloppy Joe?
With pudding
More like Jello Pudding Pops, amirite?
https://youtu.be/ePV632WDSKs
"Creamy inside! Crunchy outside!" Yeeeeech!
Soggy buns.
Sorry for interrupting but I like this spot:
Gary Shilling
Rising Inventories Are a Bearish Indicator
Don’t be surprised if retailers are forced into heavy discounting and liquidation sales after enticing consumers to buy early this holiday season.
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2021-12-10/holiday-shopping-rising-inventories-are-not-a-bullish-indicator?srnd=premium
Strudel is really fun to watch. He is so desperate that he finds any little thing he can that he thinks will change the narrative.
Unfortunately, Strudel doesn't realize that it is a BAD thing when retailers spent a bunch of money buying/building inventory, and then didn't sell it. When they sell it at a "discount" it means they are losing money, which isn't very good for their employees.
Or their *former* employees.
Our the CALPERS actuary that forecasted 20% annual returns in perpetuity to make up for an underfinanced pension plan...or the plan beneficiaries...or the taxpayers who will be stuck making up the difference.
yes he droools.
"Inflation's going up and there's no end in sight?
Just brown some ground bugs and Make It A Manwich Night!"
https://youtu.be/Dtpkv2RnDwA
Just the pullout would be sloppy.
Fuck the left
FJB FTW
Not with Janet Reno's dick.
Fuck links to articles behind pay walls.
Prices are rising faster than they have in nearly 40 years...
And yet we're in the strongest economy Jim Cramer has ever seen.
Don't listen to that Dangerous Russian Disinformation. The Experts assured us that inflation wouldn't happen and we need to Trust The Experts.
Where are we now in the official messaging about inflation?
I'm not sure. The 50-centers in the comments are still going with the "Inflation isn't happening" line, but the pundits have moved on to "Inflation is happening, but that's a good thing" and/or "You need to lower your expectations", while the politicians are at "Inflation is bad and it's getting worse because Republicans aren't agreeing to our spending bill".
Curiously, nobody seems to be taking the position that it's all Trump's fault yet.
Our friends at NYMag.
https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2021/12/jerome-powell-inflation-federal-reserve-tom-cotton-trump-biden.html
Headline: Tom Cotton Admits Trump, Not Biden, Caused Inflation
The gaslighting is almost magical these days.
Ctrl+f "Pelosi"
0/0
Yes, that's a potshot but it's not quite narrative-building. In fact, the very next article was probably about how inflation is a good thing. How can Orange Man be so Bad if the problems he caused are actually good?
So far I haven't seen any deep dives into the history of how Trump maliciously planned to cause inflation for years, I haven't seen any human interest stories about how [person] blames Trump for [inflation-related misfortune], I haven't seen compilation-worthy repetition of a "Trump caused inflation" line, and I haven't seen the White House constantly complaining about how hard their job is because of the Trump-caused inflation.
Maybe they just didn't think of this or just decided on a different narrative, maybe they focus-tested it and found it ineffective (a reflection of the leftist media's waning influence?), maybe they're keeping it in reserve for some reason. I have no clue, I just find it odd that they're not pulling the ol' "Obama's bad economy is really Bush's fault" again.
The complicating thing for Democrats is that the only things they can point to in order to blame Trump, they themselves did later on. They kept his tariffs. The made a massive pandemic bailout. They even reappointed Powell. And this was after they were so dismissive after Republicans made a huge stink about inflation at the beginning of the year.
This is like when they flirted with blaming Republicans for defunding police. Everyone could see that they were opportunisticly switching positions after their former position became untenable. It is better to bury the headlines and hope it all goes away by Nov 2022.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2022/01/january-6-insurrection-trump-coup-2024-election/620843/
12/21, They’ve decided to ignore inflation, ignore Latinos switching parties and focus on 2024 Trump coups. Great reporting in this country.
CNN In August.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/06/politics/inflation-gop-fact-check/index.html
This is CNN
People who watched CNN were more likely to correctly state that inflation was transitory.
From the link:
"Mark Zandi, chief economist of Moody's Analytics, told CNN that "The jump in inflation has nothing to do with tax and spending policies.""
So, clearly, Moody's does not know a thing.
Par for the course with Zandi.
They know how to keep having influence in an age of Lysenkoism.
It is funny to read though.
Maybe Zandi is one of the Democrats working there, trying to provide chaff for Biden. Aka he is one of the Moody blues.
OBL, is that you?
Stroodle and SPB will be along shortly to remind us this is all in spitting tobacco and made up for with the 4% expected wage growth biden promised next year.
This is why the "Inflation hurts rich people most" canard is such bullshit. Rich people by and large hold their reserves in assets like stocks. Those stocks are pretty much the biggest hedge you've got against inflation.
Everything they buy is an hedge against inflation. Stock market, land, senators.
no one thinks that. the media reports it but no one believes that one.
"And yet we're in the strongest economy Jim Cramer has ever seen."
turd approves this statement!
Good thing I stocked up on smokeless tobacco.
...but prices rising is NOT INFLATION.
There is no such thing as price inflation in macroeconomics
This is a media invented lie...
"Great Britain is bracing for a rough winter as the omicron variant threatens to shutter parts of the economy."
The omicron variant isn't doing anything. The British government is threatening to shutter parts of the economy.
Surprised to see something this sloppy in Reason.
...prices seem to be accelerating rather than cooling off or proving to be "transitory."
Transitory was meant to apply to how long our betters were going to pretend to take the price of things seriously.
The keep using that word, I do not think it means what the think it means
Transitory just means that you move on from it. We moved on from 4% inflation, to 5% to 7%. TRANSITORY!
Next step Zimbabwe.
Spazzle: “Everyone will be a trillionaire!”
Why do you think the tax hikes are targeted at people making over 400K? Everyone will be making 400K in a few years.
But enough about spittin tobacky.
See. This guy knows.
Gonna ban that stuff anyway.
Following the lead of the free state of New Zealand no doubt (I remember when libertarians were moving there for the freedom....)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/12/09/new-zealand-smoking-ban-cigarettes/
New Zealand is planning to outlaw smoking for future generations, with new policies that include raising the age limit every year — meaning many people who are currently young teens will never be able to legally buy a cigarette.
Local story I suppose.
Young people will never drink beer or smoke dope.
I'm sure raising interest rates on an entity that has some 30 trillion dollars in outstanding debt will have no effect whatsoever.
Of course it won't. The only way to fix inflation is to print off and spend another 4 trillion dollars.
People are hurting. We have to get them more cash.
The libertarian solution is to let people print their own money.
Raising interest rates would encourage saving. The only way out of inflation is spend all that excess largess .gov has bequeathed us. Preferably on cheap Chinese imports so the big guy gets his 10%.
But how about the big guy's little guy's method: spend it all on hookers and drugs? And art supplies.
“the big guy's little guy”
Is that what you call it?
Sloppy Joe’s floppy Joe
...there is no objective reason to believe that inflation is more of a problem for the wealthy.
Objectively when the rabble's restlessness is not being pointed at each other but instead to the economy, it becomes a headache for the elite class.
So the internal documents that got leaked from Facebook saying their algorithm pushes the worst thing to get clicks is made up, thanks reason
Facebook is just a bunch of Boomers who wouldn't understand
real journalismsocial media if it slapped them in the face.By our estimate, neutral/commission maps in the blue states of CA, CO, NJ, VA and WA (93 seats total) will end up costing Dems 10-15 House seats they could have seized by gerrymandering...
So the GOP even takes unfair advantage of fair district maps.
Republicans pounce on fair districtin
"Inflation Hits Highest Level Since 1982"
Nope.
I have been informed that the i-word is a wingnut.com myth. Literally one item in the entire country has risen in price — smokeless tobacco, by $0.10 per pouch. And that stuff is totally gross so you shouldn't be buying it anyway.
#DefendBidenAtAllCosts
It's worse than that, it's greedy corporations illegally colluding to jack up their prices just to boost their profits to obscene levels.
Yep, if corporations cared as much about people as Democrats do, all consumer goods would be free.
Biden will shutdown inflation the same way he shutdown the virus.
Shit. We need 4 stimuli now??
Will it come with another booster shot?
It is almost comical how it was only YESTERDAY that SPB and Strudel were in the comments insisting that the economy was on the upswing. It was like they have scientifically identified the perfect timing for the ultimate rhetorical face plant.
Less than 4 days after CNN reported they were working with the White House to put positive spins on the economy.
Those government dicks will not suck themselves.
Yeah OBL but.....HAPERINFLATION!
What did you expect from a communist like Joe Biden? I have a question: if the stock market is up by 35% and inflation is at 5% is that good or bad. Bad, right? Is it Venezuela bad or just Cuba bad?
Hey American Socia1ist!
"the stock market is up by 35%"
Exactly. And who benefits more from the stock market — the working class & poor ........ or the upper class to fabulously wealthy? Obviously it's the latter group. Which provides additional confirmation of OBL's First Law.
#VoteDemocratToHelpPeopleWithSweetPortfolios
#BillionairesForBiden
AARRGGHH!!! Stop calling me that. Tell you what… I’m just going to come out and tell you who I am, ok. Here: https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Ali_Alexander
I took it from a known communist front group just to show you what I’m up against in the establishment media. Get it straight: I’m a black, gay (shhh about that, ok?) trans activist like Caitlyn Jenner and Milo Yiannopoulos who doesn’t want to be on a liberal plantation with Jesse Jackson, ok? Please stop calling me a communist. Joe Biden is a communist and Democrats like Beto also are communists. I’m not a communist and, furthermore, how could anyone be a communist when the failures of Joe Biden’s radical leftist agenda are plain to see with its historical [average] inflation rate in line with much of the post war economy?
Fuck it… since most people keep misidentifying me (I’m a gay back Republican!) as some Leftist average White guy who wants to get a Social Security check when he retires from’m just changing my handle and using my real name. It has Akbar in it. Will that get me banned?
This is a sad effort squrlsy.
Fuck off and die, shitbag.
Hey, don't forget about the Biden Boom! I mean, look at all the dough Hunter got for his paintings. Doesn't that qualify as a boom?
Indirect stimulus to hookers and meth/crack dealers.
A boomdoggle, for sure, to be fair.
Republicans pounce! Democrats hardest hit.
-Wasserman
Hey bohem remember when you endorsed this train wreck?
“I will cast my first ever vote for president for Joe Biden in the battleground state of Pennsylvania.”
“I’ve been vacillating between sitting out this election, as I did in 2016, or voting for Joe Biden. The strongest argument for the latter choice is that it’s an opportunity to support the repudiation of both Trumpism and AOC” (lol)
“I’ll be voting for Joe Biden, primarily for three reasons: (1) A feeble president Biden seems like an opportunity to erode the power and glamour of the dangerous cult of the presidency and also push socialists, nationalists, and identitarians back to the margins, creating space for a more libertarian-friendly coalition to emerge.” (Oh wow! lol)
“If it was going to be close in my state, I might have considered holding my nose and voting for the person most likely to supplant the eminently fireable incumbent.”
"I will vote for Jo Jorgensen—unless I believe there is a chance that Joe Biden will somehow fail to win Virginia, in which case I will vote strategically and reluctantly for Biden."
“I’ll be voting for Joe Biden, primarily for three reasons: (1) A feeble president Biden seems like an opportunity to erode the power and glamour of the dangerous cult of the presidency and also push socialists, nationalists, and identitarians back to the margins, creating space for a more libertarian-friendly coalition to emerge.”
This is such a ridiculous pretense. Regardless of what one thinks of centralized executive authority, it's a fact of history that most advanced societies will eventually cleave in some fashion to "monarchical"-style leadership. Even supposedly watered-down forms of government like "commissions" tend to coalesce around someone who's the most competent in the group at wrangling everyone in the same direction.
Electing a drooling, increasingly senile hair-sniffer is hardly a recipe for reducing the glamour of a strong leader. To the contrary, it tends to make people wish for someone with actual leadership to be in charge, especially in times of financial and social upheaval like we're experiencing now. The days of relatively weak Presidents such as the years between Jackson and Lincoln, and Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt, are the exception, not the rule.
Never, ever let them forget, Red.
Whether or not the Drool Cup President will usher in a tyrant next year (and I don't entirely disagree with you hear) the other problem that was not considered was the fact that pretty much EVERY TIME in history that a weak leader was propped up as a fearless leader, it has NEVER resulted in a flourishing of freedom.
Almost without fail, when children kings, senile leaders, and other weak leaders assume the throne, it is to be a puppet that can take the blame while authoritarians make major changes in the background. I mean for fucks sake, has no one ever watched the Byzantine empire, or Romans, or Iran, or Post Soviet Russia?
A weak leader emboldens the power brokers to go for broke re-setting the game board, and rarely are the common citizens winners at the end.
Yep. The death of Edward III and the Black Plague resulted in several decades of on-off civil war in England that eventually saw the ascension of a legitimately tyrannical dynasty in the Tudors.
A weak executive figurehead is not something to chase as a general political principle. A leader can still be strong and competent without acting like a tyrant, but in times of crisis, that sort of thing is VERY rare.
Instead of removing the glamor it ramped up the dnc/media propaganda
"Trumpism "
What is trumpism exactly? I have never been able to find a good description of how trump and trump policies are so different from the norm other than mean tweets. Seriously.
What is trumpism exactly?
When a Republican doesn't automatically present hindquarters to a Democrat. Someone who doesn't aspire to be a graceful loser.
It's a mortal sin according to the Atlantic.
Poor Boehm. Posting his L with this article. Should I go pull up your blurb from the voting article Eric? A return to "normalcy" and an ignoring of Bidens open platform probably wasn't the best of ideas was it?
But no mean tweets. That is what mattered to Boehm the Birdbrain.
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange is one step closer to being extradited to the United States.
If only someone in power were able to recognize what slimy pieces of shit our intelligence community and the DoJ are and moved to preemptively pardon Julian Assange as well as Edward Snowden.
If only someone in power were able to recognize what slimy pieces of shit our intelligence community and the DoJ are and moved to preemptively pardon Julian Assange as well as Edward Snowden, they would obviously out themselves as Russian assets.
FIFY
Not likely, since the slimy shits are the ones in power.
Trump was our best bet. Unless Biden does it accidentally.
"Unless Biden does it accidentally."
Like turd posting something which isn't a lie; it does happen, but pack a lunch and bring a cot if you're going to wait for it.
That was one of Trump's biggest failures, and he shamefully didn't do it to placate the neocons.
Didn't the fbi threaten trump not to pardon them?
Yes. Not laying waste to the FBI and the CIA was another huge Trump failure.
They did a good job keeping him on the defensive.
Trump was a law and order new yorker at his core. I have talked with tons of these people, and they believe as a default position that pervasive government surveillance is a good thing, and that only people with something to hide would object.
I truly believe that Trump was completely shocked to find out how much the FBI was abusing its powers, and it took him awhile to figure out how deep the rot was. By the time he had figured out what was happening, it was too late. Trump had already been "linked" to wikileaks, so a Pardon would have looked self serving at that point.
Unless by 'too late' you mean he didn't realize in 2001, slight disagreement. He knew during his campaign that the FBI was spying on him. I don't think he found out the pervasiveness of the surveillance too late. I just think it wasn't enough of a priority. Too hard of a slog with not enough political pwnage to pay off.
When did he know during the campaign? My understanding was that the big talk came shortly after he was sworn in and the FBI director briefed him strategically in a way that would allow some leaks?
You're more correct about when he realized when he was being spied upon. I stand by my assertion wrt to the fuzziness of 'too late'. He campaigned against the deep state and, one month in, was aware that he was being spied upon, so it's not like he suddenly discovered he was being spied upon by an intelligence/LEO community that he had full faith in until a month before he left office.
"Actor Jussie Smollett was convicted of falsely reporting a hate crime, hopefully bringing an end to one of the dumbest legal sagas in American history."
If anyone doubts the US still operates according to WHITE SUPREMACY and SYSTEMIC RACISM, this trial should have changed your mind. Smollett was literally almost lynched ....... and now he's the one being punished?!
#IBelieveJussie
There is a database recording all the times grand wizards of the KKK have used cops to hide and bury hate crimes in the racist white supremacist media.
For some reason this site is eating the following link to the database...
No idea why this would be on a filtered list.
Fake hate crimes dot org
The most cringe-worthy act on Smollett's part was to leave the hospital with the 'noose' still draped around his neck.
Yeah, the MDs and nurses would have treated his wounds with that left in place.
Truly LOL.
The most cringe-worthy act on Smollett's part was to leave the hospital with the 'noose' still draped around his neck.
Too much cringe all the way around. Biggest personal cringe in retrospect? Robbie playing it like it was the police couldn't get their story straight about what actually happened (despite them giving a straight story until Jussie changed his).
Perhaps Robbie has enough to put a down payment on that bridge I have for sale.
Actor Jussie Smollett was convicted of falsely reporting a hate crime, hopefully bringing an end to one of the dumbest legal sagas in American history.
So Chicago is finally officially no longer MAGA country?
If you get Lightfoot elected to higher office, I will never forgive you.
Fun note Obama won his firs Chicago election by getting a judge to disqualify his opponents ballots over non matching signitures
Fun note: Obama won both the primary and the senate election by having the divorce/custody records of both his primary opponent and his general election opponent leaked to the media, against both men, and their wives', wishes.
Neither woman, in either case filed any criminal charges, but the unsubstantiated allegations (one of which, if true, wasn't even a crime) were enough to cause both men to resign.
Never understood Ryan leaving.
"So, records show you took your hot wife Jeri to sex clubs and then railed her. While your opponent married somebody who resembles Chewbacca."
So, records show you took your hot wife Jeri to sex clubs and then railed her.
Even this is the selectively-favorable/disingenuous interpretation of the facts. By her own testimony, Jeri never had sex or was forced or coerced into sex in or around a sex club.
"So, records show you took your hot wife Jeri to a sex club and then wondered out loud if she was interested in having sex. To which she said 'No' and, literally, nothing else happened."
Oh, my bad. I thought she'd actually had sex with some of the participants.
Shows how closely I'd followed it.
What do you expect from a borg?
Turned her out, too. Which many voters might've had a problem with.
Of course, that seems so quaint, post-Epstein Island.
Lol.
Boehm said more or less what I was going to say this morning about food inflation. You can read the report yourself here:
https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cpi.nr0.htm
One curious part:
"The index for food away from home rose 5.8 percent over the last year, the largest 12-month increase since the period ending January 1982. The index for limited service meals rose 7.9 percent over the last 12 months, and the index for full service meals rose 6.0 percent. The index for food at employee sites and schools, in contrast, declined 44.9 percent over the past 12 months.
----Bureau of Labor Statistics
That bolded part is interesting. Yeah, at home food is rising faster than the price of eating away from home, and that's telling, but how about food prices away from home surging--even as overall demand decreased by 44.9%? If you see food prices rise even as the quantity demanded decreases continues to decrease, you might be
a rednecklooking at inflation.Those chickens and bushels of corn aren't waiting to be unloaded in Long Beach harbor.
If demand hasn't increased then what basis do people have to claim that spending is the cause of the inflation?
If you're not familiar with the standard cause of inflation, you have a gigantic hole in your knowledge. It's like asking me to teach you how to integrate something before you can count to ten.
"The consensus view among economists is that sustained inflation occurs when a nation's money supply growth outpaces economic growth."
----Investopedia
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/inflation.asp
That's putting it mildly, and if you don't already understand this and what it means, then you owe it to yourself to educate yourself on the topic. You cannot intelligently discuss economic policy without understanding this and several other topics--like you can't intelligently discuss the quadratic equation with someone who can't count to ten.
You apparently don't understand it. These aren't normal times. There was a pandemic and a collapse in supply. Again if the demand hasn't increased then clearly the issue is supply.
Governments imposing draconian measures certainly did affect supply. Clearly the issue is government.
That's true. 100% legit true. I'm not arguing with that.
Govts around the world by the way. Practically every organized govt and the places that didn't restrict activity suffered economic damage even still. There was no escaping this disruption.
This. Always this.
Reason:
"Great Britain is bracing for a rough winter as the omicron variant threatens to shutter parts of the economy."
The omicron variant isn't shutting down shit. It is government fuckery.
Does Biden get credit for not doing what that conservative Tory PM is doing?
Jesus Christ, you want me to defend Biden for not being as authoritarian as another politician?
Sure Biden raped me, but it wasn't anal rape, like the PM did.
Is that what you mean?
Once watched an NFL game where a backup QB came in. He threw 3 passes. One was a pick six. One was an interception that wasn’t returned. The third pass was just incomplete. Should QB Biden get credit for just throwing an incomplete pass?
You want empty containers where they're not needed? Inflation? Empty shelves? Container-ship traffic-jams?
Easy. Turn a market-based economy over to the control of econ-ignoramuses like Newsom and Cuomo, and give them a little bit of time to work their 'magic'.
I just wanted brownouts but am thankful they threw those in too.
He's done far more than his predecessor with dramatically worse results. Does he take any blame for that?
Jesus Christ spazzle,
Boris Johnson will be history soon
Yes! Not Normal Times (TM), so we can throw out the Constitution, shut down global economies, hand out money like candy, and condition people to shit their pants on command.
Now I understand.
Well said.
"You apparently don't understand it. These aren't normal times. There was a pandemic and a collapse in supply. Again if the demand hasn't increased then clearly the issue is supply."
Gravity didn't stop working because of the pandemic over the last year, and the laws of supply and demand didn't stop working either. You seem to be missing a basic understanding about the effects of supply and demand on the value of money, and what the impact is of the money supply increasing is by government spending. I'm not here to teach you, and you don't seem to know enough to realize that everyone in this thread is laughing at you when you're talking about the cause of inflation--for good reasons.
It's because they know how to count ten, and you can't even count to two on this topic. I'm not here to educate you where your teachers and your parents failed. You need to take the initiative and educate yourself. Do you still believe in geocentric theory, too?! I'm not here to teach you about that either. You'll have to go teach yourself. Just realize that the people you're regurgitating here is making you look foolish to everyone who knows what they're talking about.
You wrote all that without saying anything. Your specialty.
"I'm not here to teach you about that either. You'll have to go teach yourself."
The purpose of this isn't to insult. It's just that the truth is insulting to you personally. You are profoundly ignorant, and it shows. Now's your chance to go learn something!
Do you care whether you're wrong or right? Do you care whether you're rational or irrational? Are you here to learn? Are you here to teach us something? We'll know for sure soon enough.
"Do you still believe in geocentric theory, too?!?"
You say that the sun orbits the earth. We say that the earth orbits the sun. You ask us to prove it. We don't waste our time or energy with people who are so profoundly ignorant that they don't know the consensus cause of inflation.
I'm really hoping you go educate yourself on this issue. I'm rooting for you! Pull that fly up. Don't walk around with your fly hanging open anymore. None of always knew what we know now, and I'm hoping you're the kind of person who can still learn and teach things.
Simple example.
At an auction every person has $100 to spend. The prices paid are capped by that. The government comes along and gives every person another $100, so each has $200. Prices will increase since everyone has more to spend.
Get it??
I muted that fool long ago but I'm certain of the answer to your question anyway.
No. No it will definitely not get it.
Willful ignorance in the name of political beliefs is the most obstinate ignorance known to mankind.
The left are locked in an existential struggle with reality and facts and they will deny logic and data that contradicts their crazyass narratives.
I give all of them a few chances. I even did it with Dee.
At some point, they decide to take the red pill or the blue pill. I make sure they understand the issue--and then you give them the choice.
Do you care whether you're wrong or right? Do you care whether you're rational or irrational? Are you here to learn? Are you here to teach us something?
People who disagree with me are one thing. I'll talk to them all day. If they don't care whether they're wrong, if they don't care whether they're irrational, if they don't care about the facts, if they aren't here to learn or teach us something, then there's no point in reading what they write.
It’s amazing how people like sir strudel can be so thoroughly embarrassed, yet still show back up spouting their ignorant nonsense.
But it gives me a chuckle, so I don’t mind.
Inflation is always profit!
"You wrote all that without saying anything. Your specialty."
Notice whenever Ken posts something the exact same guys are on him regardless of what he wrote.
Also notice that they're the same guys who are normally whinging about others being flippant and rude to them, and demanding comprehensive and respectful replies.
Ken gives them that, so they bitch he's being wordy.
Cheap fucking trolls.
The stupid are too stupid to understand how stupid they are; turd and Tony leading the way.
Yeah, I noticed that, too. There was zero substance to what Ken wrote, other than personally insulting you.
Oh fuck off, you lying sack-of-shit. Even if it were true, it's incredibly hypocritical for you to point out. You follow Ken around trolling and harrassing him at every opportunity, throwing out personal insults all the time.
You even bragged about it when you asked Sqrlsy to help you troll:
Mike Laursen
September.18.2021 at 11:38 am
SQRLSY, can you cover for me today? In a typical day, I usually post a comment or two pointing out logical flaws, contradictions and partisanship in Ken’s essays, which he regards as examples of flawless logical thinking.
I'd like to ask everyone to take a brief moment and invite Mike to go fuck himself/herself.
amazing how the cultists fool themselves.
A canard used by tyrants to justify tyranny since time immemorial.
You know who else took advantage of inflation in abnormal times?!
FDR?
James Glasisher?
Count Ferdinand von Zeppelin?
I've been to London, seen seven wonders I know to trip is just to fall
Bizmark?
"Again if the demand hasn't increased then clearly the issue is supply."
This is an idiotic statement. Inflation is not a result of increased demand. If you ever get out of grade school into Econ 101, you will learn that in an inflationary environment, the Demand Curve doesn't increase, it just shifts right. That is, people go from demanding X units at Y price to demanding X units at Y+1 price. And the Supply Curve does the same thing, because the cost of inputs and Suppliers' preferred expenditures has also risen, so they go from willing to supply Z units at Y price, to supplying Z units at Y+1.
Please, for the love of god stop listening to the morons on whatever reddit channel you read and educate yourself for once.
"on whatever reddit channel you read"
Act Blue talking points memos.
The same asshole who yesterday was pointing at the unemployment rate and talking about how great the economy is doing now says we still have a supply problem.
Keep molesting kids asshole, eventually one of their parents might put you out of your misery.
The supply chain problem makes it worse. But dropping 2 trillion bucks at a time on the economy would drive prices up, even without supply problems.
Yes, there appears to be a combination of both mechanisms at work.
If you go by the classic Friedman definition of inflation, the supply chain problems shouldn’t be categorized as inflation. They are specific price increases in specific goods.
The 44.9% decrease is not on quantity demand. It’s a price measure. And it’s not on food away from home. It’s on food at employers and schools.
"The 44.9% decrease is not on quantity demand. It’s a price measure. And it’s not on food away from home. It’s on food at employers and schools."
I do not believe the price of food decreased by 44.9% for employers and schools, and it is not unreasonable to assume that the reason employers and schools spent less on food is because they were closed.
Meanwhile, we see that the price of eating away from home increased over the last year--which is to say that 1) far fewer people were eating away from home over the past year and 2) the price of that food bought away from home increased anyway.
The mega farm my family partially owns had their best most profitable year ever because of these commodity prices. Inflation is always profit. Remember that when you don't want to tax these rich people.
I don't want to steal from, I mean, tax, anyone.
Taxing leftists by any means necessary would be good
$50 processing fee per mail in ballot. It isn’t a poll tax because one can vote in person.
excision by Louisville Slugger.
"Inflation is always profit."
This is ignorance.
Profit is the difference between costs and revenue. You can prices to generate more revenue, but if that doesn't exceed your costs, you're still not making a profit.
When you raise prices, you're also pricing some customer out of the market. If being forced to raise prices because of rising costs means you're doing less volume, you can and will lose profit by price increases.
I'm not saying this to educate you. I'm saying this to show you that you severely lack education. Watch you derp like this is like watching a child say 2 + 5 = potato. You're not knowledgeable enough to speak about this without embarrassing yourself, and I'm actually being a nice guy by telling you that your fly is open.
Go educate yourself, but be prepared to realize that you can't both believe the things average progressives believe about the way the economy works and be knowledgeable. I'd say you're a fundamentalist Christian right now arguing against evolution in the name of young earth creationism, but I've met creationists who know more about the way the economy works than you do.
And as a scientist I've met many scientists who also believe in creationism. Amazing.
If you believe in an omnipotent God, creationism isn't much a stretch.
If you believe that Joe Biden has the god like powers necessary to dramatically increase the money supply without suffering the effects of inflation, on the other hand . . .
What progressives believe about the way the economy works is far dumber than creationism--and that is not necessarily a knock on creationism. The only people who should be offended by that statement are the progressives.
Bonhoeffer makes the point that stupidity is not related to any other conditions or positions he can identify: Ehrlich is a highly educated and credentialed charlatan who clings to the stupid notion that humans are like his lab-rats.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ww47bR86wSc&t=2s
As a Christian, I believe creationism and evolution are equally real. Creationism explains why God did as he did (since man simply is not capable of creating actual life, HOW it was done was not relevant compared to why) and evolution is the simply the study of how. Bible focused on what it found relevant and science studies what it finds relevant. I, personally, see no conflict in the two at all.
Bingo. Science explains how, God is why.
Not going to check but the only people that would say something that stupid is queen or stroozel
The mega farm my family partially owns
My uncle's cousin's brother-in-law owns a majority share of the same farm and he says you're full of shit.
My neighbor’s brother’s cousin’s dog also owns part of it, and the bitch agrees.
Yeah, that certainly looks like an attempted appeal to authority.
Inflation is always profit.
So Weimar Germany was the most prosperous nation in history.
No, moron, inflation is not profit.
Just keep sucking my rich dick. It's a decent consolation prize.
That's a pathetic response.
Are you at all familiar with what caused hyperinflation during the Weimar Republic?
Think of all the rich guys in Venezuela.
Those are the ones who can afford some gas!
Hell, using his logic, the Confederacy was LOADED during the Civil War given how bad its inflation was.
I'll settle for your home being turned in to a smoking crater.
"Just keep sucking my rich dick. It's a decent consolation prize."
So, Zimbabwe is the most profitable country?
Venezuela has been raking in the cash, is that right?
I mean, YOU did say "Inflation is always profit."
You can keep your fantasies about somebody fellating you to yourself and just answer the questions asked based on your comments.
yeah, until they try to buy fuel, or a new tractor, or get a loan and interest rates have doubled.
They have oil wells bud and own stock in the companies that sell tractors. You should see the dividend checks we cash.
Hahaha!
LOL… “WE” LOL
Your anecdote about your parents' watermelon farm in Oklahoma isn't really representative of the entire economy.
Anyway, reminds me of Elizabeth Warren. She does a great impression of Hugo Chavez. She should be embarrassed for blaming the hoarders and wreckers.
It's really just so stupid: "You know what causes inflation? GREED!" Really? So human greed is something that ebbs and flows over the years? People just got more greedy this year? They weren't greedy a few years ago, but they were really greedy under Carter!
Whatever. Stop believing whatever false narrative you want to believe. Do some research. Read a book that doesn't confirm your own biases.
Inflation is always profit.
What an idiot.
Commodity prices are high because of a historic drought over the great plains states that decreased corn and wheat production, as well as led to decreased cow inventory. Areas not impacted by the drought did well, areas impacted by the drought didn't do as well, despite high commodity prices. With the increase in fuel prices, profits will decrease for all farmers and ranchers next year, because the cost of production just sky rocketed.
It’s a lot more likely that prices for food at employers and schools decreased by 44.9%, since vendors might have been trying to dump that specialized food in the face of collapsing demand, than the BLS suddenly switched from reporting on price changes throughout the report and singled out one small market to report on quantity demanded. But that speculation is irrelevant, since the BLS doesn’t collect data on quantity demanded! I have no idea what your last point is about eating away from home. I made no comments about that statistic.
Yeah, my thinking was that because schools and employers were closed down, the demand dropped.
Griffin3 mentioned below that a lot of schools went to free lunches, and if they're tracking final goods and services paid to those consumers, they'd need to factor in all those zeroes paid by the kid at school.
I'd think that should be an asterisk in the report somewhere. At that point, they should probably be tracking the price of the food sold to the school rather than the price of the food sold to the student.
Regardless, I would maintain that when the schools were shut down, over the past year, there was less food demanded at schools. Those kids who were learning virtually were eating at home. Those people who were working from home were eating at home. There must have been less quantity demanded if those two groups of people were at home rather than outside of it.
Of course the quantity demanded went down. No one is disputing that. But your original point was that food prices away from home were surging even as quantity demanded dropped 45%. You were badly misinterpreting the BLS report. Just own up to it and stop bringing in other points to deflect. We all make mistakes. Leave the deflection to the idiots on this site. You make too many good points to have to resort to that.
I cited the index decline as direct evidence that demand had dropped--and I assumed that the index decline was a result of falling demand because schools, offices, and restaurants were closed.
My point (and I apparently didn't make it well), was:
General premise: When you see prices increase despite the quantity demanded falling, you're probably looking at inflation.
Specific premise: The price of food sold outside the home increased over the last year--despite a decline in the quantity demanded.
Conclusion: Therefore, we are probably looking at inflation.
I cannot speak to employee sites, but the food at the local schools has gone to $0 cost; they made the price reductions and the expansion of the free school lunch program to everyone permanent. Which is probably skewing this number in a serious way.
It's still crap wheat bread pizza, etc. Although my kids report, since everything is individually wrapped in plastic before the lunch starts (thanks, covid), now even the first lunch kids get limp flabby french fries that have been steamed to death.
They're still paying the suppliers for that food!
. . . I should add--but that could account for the price drop if that's what they're counting.
The cost isn't 0 though. This food is still being bought by the government. As I note below it is more a factor of the mix of food. We went from a world where Google, Facebook, and many other companies were bringing food onto their campus, as well as schools, to a world where pretty much only schools are bringing food onto their campus.
Google serves artisanal pizzas served with fancy napkins. Schools serve pizzas made of used napkins. The average price has decreased.
"even as overall demand decreased by 44.9%?"
Overall demand didn't decrease- just the price of food at Employee Sites and Schools. And there is a very good reason for that. Businesses- especially in the metropolitan areas like Silicon Valley- remain work from home. I know for a fact that most of the Silicon Valley companies have drastically reduced their on-site meals due to so few people being in the office.
As a result, this spending category is now dominated by school lunches which cost far, far less than food at business sites.
But it is important to note that this is a small segment of the overall food economy.
"Overall demand didn't decrease- just the price of food at Employee Sites and Schools."
As I wrote about, I guess my verbiage was imprecise.
However, what I was trying to say is that prices increased over the last year--even as quantity of food demanded away from home decreased.
Sales may have been counted lower because schools were giving away free lunches, but the fact is that with all those schools closed down, there were far fewer people eating at school and far fewer people eating in a restaurant (because they were working from home or because the restaurant was closed).
Any way you slice it, prices increased as the demand for that food away from home decreased.
"Any way you slice it, prices increased as the demand for that food away from home decreased."
All I am saying is that I don't think anything you quoted indicates that "demand for food away from home" has decreased or increased. The only slackening in price was a single category of food, not overall food away from home and we do not know what portion of the overall market this represents. (For example, while food at businesses went down, likely home meal delivery like DoorDash went up). And, again, it is specifically a price index, not a demand index that reduced- we can safely assume it was because it was a lack of demand for food on employer campuses, but these are not stated in the data.
Great Britain is bracing for a rough winter as the omicron variant threatens to shutter parts of the economy.
Yes, the omicron variant. [Government eyes shifting back and forth nervously]
If you think the OmniCronBot was out of control when it started imposing flight restrictions and mask mandates and economic lockdowns and an alarming rise in both inflation and street crimes, wait until next year when it starts postponing elections. No wonder the media is so terrified of this new variant, it's out of control and there's no way to stop it short of involving Japanese film-makers!
Yeah, this last two years has a legit V for Vendetta feel.
Just for the record, no virus has shuttered any part of any economy.
Fascist led governments, on the other hand - - - - - - - -
The OhMyCrony variant?
if no one has died from omicron, can they still justify the lockdowns saying "if it saves even one life"?
In my best Jon Lovitz voice: "Yeaaaah, that's the ticket. The Ommmmmnicront variant. Yeaaahhhh, that's what it is."
After encouraging restaurants to open up outdoor dining space, San Francisco is rolling out 60 pages of new rules for renewing those permits...
And people choose this?
What else can they do--vote for an insurrectionist Republican?
Or worse, let people make decisions and fend for themselves?
Jussie Smollett is a lying liar who lies about his lying with lies.
Jussie is Jeffy!
Does seem cruel, though, to lock in a cell with his attacker.
Ezra Klein
@ezraklein
This is like a parody of liberal governance. 60 pages of rules to keep parklets that the city encouraged restaurants to build.
No Ezra. That is business as usual with centralized planning you leftist dummy. This is what you and Vox advocate for openly.
We have the Sarc Beast Ice Mute Bowl. But a commentariat Woodchipper Playoffs where we rank the libertarianism of the write…editors may be a fun adventure.
To be fair, Ezra Klein is a parody of a journalist.
How about 60 pages of rules for publishing an article?
A few decades after banning families from having multiple kids, China is now banning vasectomies in the hopes of raising birth rates.
They can't figure out why they're running out of birth persons all the sudden.
Within the next 10 years, China will likely ban abortions for the same reason. So here's the bet: will leftists ignore it and continue to advocate for more abortion in the West, or will the hop on board the party narrative and start decrying the evils of abortion?
Abortion is sacred to Leftists. They will silently accept that China does things differently, and that is OK. Otherwise they would be cultural imperialists.
That practice was a real chink in their armor.
That pun took a sudden slant.
What you expect from yellow journalism?
Now there's an interesting slant on the story
They need to ban video games. Why establish a relationship with another person, when you can sit at home and game?
Another triumph of central planning!
"A few decades after banning families from having multiple kids,..."
Pretty sure that charlatan Ehrlich was trumpeting this at the time
and that is one operation you definitely don't want to get in a back alley
amazing example of central planning.
forced abortions to solve a problem followed by banned vasectomies to solve the problems caused by the forced abortions.
The technocrats of the CCP patting themselves on the back
"Prices are rising faster than they have in nearly 40 years, as year-over-year inflation hit 6.8 percent in November."
Those evil corporations! We know that prices have nothing to do with costs of labor, materials, energy, regulations, or taxes. And certainly not a function of supply and demand, juiced by lots of free money.
"Prices are rising faster than they have in nearly 40 years, as year-over-year inflation hit 6.8 percent in November."
Can you believe the Republicans are obstructing Biden's solution to this problem--by opposing the Build Back Better price reduction bill?!
Progressive economics: mandate wage increases while imposing price controls.
Those wacky leftists never learn.
Maduro is still scratching his head about what is causing the bread shortage. After arresting numerous bakery owners for making pastries, brownies and cookies the bread shortage worsened.
Why won't the peasants simply do what they are told?
Progressive economics: fix inflation (caused by dumping too much cash on the economy) by dumping more cash on the economy.
and fix the supply chain issues by giving people more paid time off
+1 x 2
Except, none of the cash the Democrats have approved spending has had time to hit the economy yet. Which means any inflation we are experiencing right now that is being caused by jacked-up government spending is from stimulus spending done during the Trump Administration.
So the monthly checks I'm getting from the Treasury for having children aren't real? I've been depositing them every month and the bank honors them which makes the money very real.
Mayhap you don't know what you're talking about.
Oh. Futures have no play or changes to current markets. Tell us more about economics Mike.
That is. We have two free-spending major political parties.
Both sides!
Just sad and pathetic.
The New Yorker's profile of Enes Kanter Freedom, the Boston Celtics center who has become the sports world's most outspoken China critic.
I guess now we find out how much of The New Yorker China owns.
China doesn't even have to own the New Yorker. Leftists will go to bat for a totalitarian communist regime currently engaged in a genocide voluntarily and without compensation.
Or the NBA.
We know which Celtic player doesn’t have a shoe deal.
https://www.foxnews.com/sports/nba-begged-enes-freedom-to-take-off-shoes-that-criticized-china
Kanter is a legit dude. He was speaking out while playing here in Portland and couldn't even fly to Canada to play in Toronto for fear he would be extradited back home.
love that fucking guy.
Are birds real?
The eggs my hens produce are tasty enough to know that the government couldn't have had a hand in them.
Dee could write a cawlumn on this.
That would be a feather in his cap.
Seems like he could just wing it.
Hummingbirds can't be real. They don't even have them in Europe.
The spaghetti monster movement was so great, they decided to reboot it.
"Wasserman's tweet makes it sound like those reforms are specifically harming Democrats, but that's only half true. The changes in states like California and Virginia were implemented to limit gerrymandering by both parties. It just so happens that Democrats are trying to do it in a lot of places this time around."
Democrats don't gerrymander. They fortify electoral districts for deserving Heroes of the People.
"Great Britain is bracing for a rough winter as the omicron variant threatens to shutter parts of the economy."
Omicron threatens? Not the sissy-boy nanny authoritarian government?
https://img.ifunny.co/images/28cfa02007a497e561e9f54dab40588ae8bf8c1d7dd69a1477640cd536c2739f_1.webp
" Are birds real?"
We know how at least one of you feels:
https://twitter.com/reasonrat/status/1207756912407797760
'Wasserman's tweet makes it sound like those reforms are specifically harming Democrats"
Jesus, halftrue, because theoretically in the future those blue states could come under Republican control so Republicans would thrn be subject to the reforms. Go fuck yourself.
They also hurt Republicans in red states. But redistricting reforms are only going to change a district or two. The nature of a state will still remain red or blue. Texas is going to remain nearly all red, and California will remain nearly all blue. No amount of resdistricting can change that.
That doesn't mean redistricting reform isn't needed. For the locals it makes a huge deal. Not everything is about the national presidential election. Whether my suburban neighborhood gets included in the red rural district or the blue urban district makes a huge deal. Whether my urban district is split into two blue districts rather than one is significant, even if the total number of blue districts does not change. It's about representation.
Millions of Californians moving to Texas might change that.
Californians moving to Texas are moving there because they want to live in a more conservative state. Moves are enhancing sorting by state.
Don't you think California is doing a poor job at maintenance?
Yes, they are. Not sure how that relates to my comment.
That’s because you’re a simpleton.
The good news is that these awful price comparisons year over year will look much better next year for the same reason they look shitty this year.
Well, you've been wrong in every post so far, so why stop now? I guess.
Remember how your team celebrated a $0.02 drop in gas prices over a 2 week period, when those same prices are still up over $1.00 over last year?
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
There are long abandoned gas stations in my town with higher prices on their decrepit signs than we have now.
Seems your entire town is full of economic wizards like yourself.
And where's that?
Like I would tell a psycho like you. Anyone I own property all over this state and the next one over.
*Anyway
What state?
I think you're monumentally full of shit and best case scenario live with your mom.
Are you gonna start telling us about your giant penis next?
He won the “biggest dick” contest held amongst his fellow Navy Seals.
you're treading into Canadian Girlfriend land.
...and your wife is a former Playboy model, right?
Westeros
"There are long abandoned gas stations in my town with higher prices on their decrepit signs than we have now."
The national average price of gasoline recently rose to $3.34 a gallon, for regular, up from $2.16 a year ago--according to AAA.
https://gasprices.aaa.com/
How do you imagine the Green New Deal provisions in Biden's BBB budget reconciliation bill will impact those prices?
"There are long abandoned gas stations in my town with higher prices on their decrepit signs than we have now."
Whichever steaming lefty asshole posted this is
Full.
Of.
Shit.
Geez, dude, are you part of some social experiment where everg post has to be hilariously dumber than the last one? Did you lose some kind of bet to an Economist?
I'm betting they don't, because Biden and his idiot team are going to print trillions more in 2022 just like 2021.
Man watching your gaslights, self owns, and face plants is getting entertaining. Somehow you keep getting worse.
Could it be you are super triggered even the Biden cock sucking media wont tongue bathe him anymore and have to report the actual shit economy he owns? Because it seems like each day that happens, you come in here with even more retarded takes.
Take the L, fucking loser.
Did you hear he’s rich though?
Inflation benefits debtors and punishes savers.
Soooooo take advantage of it!
Seriously.
If you're planning to finance something, now's the time to do it. Get the longest term possible.
The dollars you pay it back with will be worth much less than the dollars you borrowed.
100% man. Take advantage because we're all not in this together.
Just trying to put some polish on this turd of an economy.
Posting your L in that post?
It sucks to be poor.
No shit. I don't miss it a bit.
Ohhhh, I get it. You're tying to impress the trolls by calling me poor and trying to bait me into being defensive.
Poor sarc.
Ideas!
Your post is literally you being defensive...
I'll believe we're all in this together when people stop trying to figuring out how someone else is supposed to work and pay taxes.
Must be more farmers than eaters in India:
"Farm laws: India farmers end protest after government accepts demands"
[...]
"The farmers were protesting against the government's introduction of three laws that loosened rules around sale, pricing and storage of farm produce - rules which have protected them from the free market for decades.
Farm unions said these laws would leave farmers vulnerable to big companies and destroy their livelihoods..."
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-59566157
It's obvious some livelihoods need to be destroyed.
Hm, just above looks like a gathering of lefty assholes.
Poor sarc thinks sir strudel is being mean to him to impress us mean girls.
If they get into a mud-wrestling match, Tony can have my ticket.
"Biden assures Ukraine's leader of US support to deter Russia"
[...]
"WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden reached out to Ukraine's leader Thursday as the United States moved to take a more direct role in diplomacy between that country and Russia, part of a broader effort to dissuade Russia from a destabilizing invasion of its western neighbor.
But any negotiations to peacefully resolve Europe’s tangled East-West rivalries will present minefields for the U.S. president...."
https://www.stamfordadvocate.com/news/article/Talks-on-Ukraine-would-pose-challenge-of-their-16687079.php
Pretty sure we can trust droolin' Joe to handle this with the same exemplary skills so evident in his last colossal fuck up.
Stock up on potassium iodide pills. For the times they are needed, they get glowing reviews.
That's some masterplan by Putin. Throw away everything to own nothing.
"Russians!"
The left morphed into Joe McCarthy so slowly that I barely noticed.
There's issues regarding that border which predate Lenin; there are Russians living in "Ukraine" and Ukrainians living in "Russia", depending on the border in any given year.
Putin's a tin-pot-dictator (with nukes, unfortunately), but there's reason to accept that he might be right here.
Further, there's even MORE reason to be assured that if droolin' Joe gets his mitts on it, he will fuck it up and *this* colossal fuck up might get real dangerous.
The left morphed into Joe McCarthy so slowly that I barely noticed.
They wish. Some of the people McCarthy called out were actually undermining the Republic.
Biden’s masterplan is to provoke an unnecessary situation an ocean away from the United States to throw good money after bad money that could result in complete destruction.
Of Russia invades the Whitehouse will issue a sternly worded letter
1) Every media company with a web presence gets 230 protection
2) It is a free speech issue, because
3) Publishing hateful content is protected by the First Amendment. The First Amendment would preclude 99.9% of liability.
So, setting aside that Section 230 violates the 1A prima facie, Section 230 protects 0.1% of liability, and only for web presences. Ergo, useless and redundant.
But let's play a fun game and turn things around a bit. Let's say that the 1A only shielded 70, or 40, or 1% of liability. Section 230, again setting aside that it violates the 1A prima facie, protects web presences 99% of the time from speech not protected by the 1A. This is the way Section 230 is *supposed* to work!?
Sec 230 does not violate the 1A and has nothing to do with the 1A.
Sec 230 does not outlaw speech.
Sec 230 gives special protections to one class of publishers in civil proceedings, unfairly IMO
Sec 230 does not violate the 1A and has nothing to do with the 1A.
Sec 230 does not outlaw speech.
Learn to fucking read. Look at everything else that's been rejected not because it regulated free speech but because it had a "chilling effect".
"Congress shall make no law" - violated.
"respecting an establishment of religion" - violated.
"prohibiting the free exercise thereof" - violated.
"the right of the people [sic] to petition the government for a redress of grievances" - violated.
Again, if Hawley and Sinema put forth a bill titled "Protection For 'Sodom and Gamorrah' Blocking and Screening of Offensive Material" you morons would beclown yourselves.
Actor Jussie Smollett was convicted of falsely reporting a hate crime, hopefully bringing an end to one of the dumbest legal sagas in American history.
LOL - you are a very silly person. We live in a post-truth world where the US was founded on white supremacy, Abraham Lincoln was a slave owner, Donald Trump was a KGB agent, and Joe Biden must spend a shitload of money in order to get inflation under control. It doesn't matter whether or not this attack actually happened, it's enough that a black man says it could have happened. Denying that a black man was the victim of a racist attack when black people are the victims of racist attacks every minute of every day simply by virtue of being a black man in a white man's world is the very height of white privilege.
There is no need to deny that Juicy was "the victim of a racist attack" when the verifiable truth is that he staged it.
The fact that a struggling black man has to pay for his own racist assault is more evidence of white supremacy, right?
When America is so great that you have to import racial oppression from Nigeria.
It’s hard to interpret your comment as anything other than signaling to others who share a belief in a conservative victimhood narrative.
Understandable, knowing that you're a leftist idiot.
... but I repeat myself.
(Psst, Jerry- you forgot to switch over to your OBL account on this one...Sheesh)
sometimes I think Jerry is probably our local 'Rabbi.' Tone and length match up.
"Jussie Smollett's conviction says more about America's white supremacy problem than it does about his actions" /WaPo article we will see in the next few days, I'm sure
Fuck Joe Biden
> Great Britain is bracing for a rough winter as the omicron variant threatens to shutter parts of the economy.
I predicted this way back at the start of the pandemic. The lockdowns would resume in Winter 2021 and we wouldn't see the end until summer 2022.
Why? Because every change is panic. A new respiratory disease season will undoubtedly cause a new rise in cases. And people will once again panic. But it can't continue because pandemic fatigue is setting in. So this will be the last lockdown. People will just ignore the future lockdowns. Even the religiously progressive with Biden shrines in their homes will finally venture out of doors. If something can't continue then it won't.
I didn't expect a working vaccine in Winter 2020, but I knew it wouldn't stop the panics. I just didn't predict that huge swaths of hte public would go anti-vaxx and refuse to vaccinate themselves. Whatever. Same idiots that won't take their flu shots.
We've long since left the pandemic phase and we're now in endemic stage. People who won't get vaccinated still won't get vaccinated, so let them live their risky lifestyle, so long as we have vaccines for the rest of us. Endless lockdowns to spite the Trump-Right is pointless.
Die soon.
I bet if anyone dies it'll be you. Possibly suicide the way you talk about it so much. That hate is gonna turn inward sooner or later.
Nardz will die by lethal injection after being convicted for mass murder.
You leftists are pure evil.
And it will take 200 years before society allows your ilk to pull down the statues erected in his honor.
As a "vaccinated" individual, I'm not sure we're seeing the societal results expected of mass "vaccination". When Joe took office, more than 1M people were being vaccinated daily, but there are more deaths with covid than there were in 2020. The non-"vaccinated" population is so small, that there's absolutely no way they are driving the death toll. It seems like its time for the "experts" to admit that the vaccines are an effective short-term therapeutic, and sell it to the public this way. They way oversold the effectiveness to the point of spewing propaganda, declared victory too soon, and now refuse to budge.
Horse, the unvaccinated - presently about 30% of US adults - is driving Covid deaths and ICU beds, both here and in Europe.
The vaccines are a modern medical miracle that have been proven highly effective, that is if you understand they don't inject themselves.
https://protect-public.hhs.gov/pages/hospital-utilization
8.62% of beds are taken by covid patients. Even if every single one of them were unvaxxed, there's no way that's overwhelming the medical system.
And in King County, the fully vaxxed make up 25% of hospitalizations. (Counting everybody with uncertain status as unvaxxed, of course)
https://kingcounty.gov/depts/health/covid-19/data/vaccination-outcomes.aspx
Dunno which of the steaming piles of lefty shit to whom you are offering facts, but not a one of the assholes cares about those things.
Yes, but you see, the reason the vaxxed make up a high percentage in King County is because over 80% of King County residents are vaxxed so, mathematically that makes sense... you see. Once 100% of everyone is vaxxed, then 100% of everyone in the ER will be vaxxed, proving that the vaccine is 100% effective. You see.
You say that sarcastically, but it is actually solid argument.
It's a solid argument as to why we'll need to be locked down, social distanced and masked even at 118% vaccination rate.
Sure. Go off on a tangent.
As I’ve said before I’m not in favor of such mandates.
You just defend them and attack actual numbers showing they don't work.
So, doesn't that mean 75% are un-vaxxed? An odd statistic to tout.
I notice you always quote the national stats, but never look at what is going on in states where there are a lot of unvaccinated people, such as Idaho.
And what is going on in Idaho?
Even during the worst of it, I quoted Idaho numerous times because you could DOUBLE their covid patients and still have room left over. Their wave passed exactly as predicted, and now a whopping 9.8% of their beds are taken by covid patients. This is quite obviously much worse than the 8.6% national average.
Meanwhile, the worst state in the country is Michigan (20.7%). What's their vax rate?
I keep hearing about Idaho on the news, but it doesn't reflect daily life. We don't vax, we don't shutdown, we don't distance, no mask mandates...We catch covid, the vast majority aren't hospitalized or die. Leave us the fuck alone.
Same as wide-open Florida, which is using less than 3% of their beds for covid.
And for some reason you are quoting stats on Idaho’s beds rather than ICU beds. Why are you always cherry picking to be dismissive of acknowledging problems caused by the unvaccinated?
Mike is flailing.
Tell us more about how the 30% of unvaccinated US adults are driving Covid19 deaths and ICU beds occupied in Europe.
I'd rather have Joe tell me about the correct way to frame a house and see if this line of crap continues.
What portion of that unvaccinated 30% has the even more robust natural immunity based on previous infection? While the number of vaccine-breakthrough cases continues to climb, the experts are not nearly silent about cases if reinfection because the number is very small.
Even the CDC acknowledges this:
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/reinfection.html
But, and this is the big giant BUT, they are still calling these people unvaccinated out of pure spite.
"Natural immunity" is not as "robust" as vaccines - as many as 30% of those who have had covid do not produce antibodies - and those with it benefit from being vaccinated.
Do you guys have Google?
"...COVID-19 vaccines are recommended, even if you had COVID-19. At present, evidence from Johns Hopkins Medicine and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) supports getting a COVID-19 vaccine as the best protection against getting COVID-19, whether you have already had the virus or not.
Here are recent research studies that support getting vaccinated even if you have already had COVID-19:
Vaccines add protection.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a report on Oct. 29, 2021, that says getting vaccinated for the coronavirus when you’ve already had COVID-19 significantly enhances your immune protection and further reduces your risk of reinfection.
A study published in August 2021 indicates that if you had COVID-19 before and are not vaccinated, your risk of getting re-infected is more than two times higher than for those who got vaccinated after having COVID-19.
Another study published on Nov. 5, 2021, by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) looked at adults hospitalized for COVID-like sickness between January and September 2021. This study found that the chances of these adults testing positive for COVID-19 were 5.49 times higher in unvaccinated people who had COVID-19 in the past than they were for those who had been vaccinated for COVID and had not had an infection before.
A study from the CDC in September 2021 showed that roughly one-third of those with COVID-19 cases in the study had no apparent natural immunity...."
https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/conditions-and-diseases/coronavirus/covid-natural-immunity-what-you-need-to-know
“Do you guys have Google?”
Fuck off Commie Joe.
Just odd that more people died this year than last, when we had ZERO vaccines until about December last year.
That is going to be something you will not be able to explain away.
damikesc, you understand I hope that the pandemic took time to spread, we practiced serious lock downs in that period - studies of which proved that was primarily out of fear, not government edict though those existed to - and the Delta variant is considerably more contagious than the first strain.
"But it can't continue because pandemic fatigue is setting in. So this will be the last lockdown."
Right now my company (woke tech industry) has decided to have limited holiday parties, because the CEO realized that the team culture is in the shitter. They announced this just before Omicron reared its ugly head, so now they are dealing with all the Karens posting terrified, "Let's not be super spreaders!" posts on our chat channels.
It is painfully obvious what is happening. The leadership is now saying, "We are monitoring the situation and will not do anything to jeopardize your safety." Which is their way of saying, "We've had enough of you babies guiding our corporate policy with your superstitious fear of Apollo's arrows. It's time to right this ship before it is beyond saving."
On the one hand, I am glad to see these leaders realizing that feeding mass delusions was not a great idea. On the other hand, I am not so certain they can bring these companies back from the breach. By all accounts, Jack Dorsey was a free speech maximalist. But he was also a liberal, who let his blind spot indulge too much culture war nonsense. By the time he realized what was happening at Twitter, it was too late- they were censoring the NY Post before an election. And unsurprisingly he has stepped down- losing complete control of his platform. How many other CEOs are in the same position right now?
I've been working from home since 2016. The commute is great but the parties suck. One thing I do like is that with all the meetings being with Zoom, I don't have to wear pants. And half the time I don't.
I've probably lost 20 pounds without a bit of dieting since I stopped working in a corporate office where there were bagels, donuts, birthday cakes, ...
I didn't know snap benefits were that terrible. Sorry to hear that you two.
My coworkers will be going back to the office soon, and will be required to mask up when not at their desk. Sucks to be them!
By all accounts, Jack Dorsey was a free speech maximalist.
I tend to watch what people do, vs what they say, and by my estimation, Dorsey was not a free speech maximalist. Unless what we saw under Dorsey's tutelage was literally outside of his control, but pretended it was in his control when pressed on it in interviews.
Agreed. He clearly ran Twitter with a thumb on the scale toward favoring liberal speech. Only difference between me and many other commenters here -- I hold that it was his right to do so.
Yes. It favored liberals. It suppressed political speech you disagree with. Of course you loved it. Even if the company misrepresented themselves and violated contracts.
Even the most concerned of political leaders, like the mayor of San Francisco and the prime ministers of the UK and Finland, are out partying, trying to encourage life to get back to normal, at least until someone records them partying.
99.98% or higher is a weird way to frame risky for the groups that haven't vaxxed Brandy.
Can't get totalitarianism without spreading irrational fear point, which is why brandy's here
"S.F. City Hall corruption probe: Community benefits program failed promises, vulnerable to abuse"
[...]
"Audit finds S.F. program all too ripe for abuse By Mallory Moench Auditors found that a program that allows contractors to pledge community benefits to help win city contracts was “poorly designed”..."
https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/S-F-City-Hall-corruption-scandal-Report-finds-16688709.php?cmpid=gsa-sfgate-result
What could go wrong when handing over 'benefits' helps you get a contract, right?
But there's a subtext even more damning: The SF city government had to HIRE AN AUDITOR TO TELL THEM IT WAS FUCKED!
Are you telling me sf is all progressive theft?
What doesn't qualify as theft amounts to bribery.
>>It turns out to be much easier to dump trillions of dollars into the economy than it is to control what happens after you do.
hate to beat a dead horse, Eric but ...
We have never been at war with Inflation.
At least not one we could WIN!
Whip Inflation Now!
also long live Al Unser, Sr.
"Birds aren't real" has been an internet thing for at least half a decade. Why is it news that some tard at NYT finally discovered it?
It's because the guy in the article is claiming he was being ironic and trying to show misinformation is rampant, and misinformation is what led to Donald Trump winning the 2016 election of course.
Seriously if these elitist wonks think that the only way a person could have voted against Killary is if they were confused by misinformation... we'll get another Trump real soon.
Another? What are you talking about? 81 million totally real and legitimate voters can't be wrong!
Should Smollett do time for his felony crime(s)? Why or why not?
I'd say I can't imagine bars in his face would help, but his trial kinda showed he doesn't think he needs a lesson in anything
Some time behind bars seems appropriate to me. Enough that it makes a difference and deters future, similar behavior. It is not 30 days (too little), or three years (too much); but it is something.
Also, there was talk of 'reimbursement' to Chicago for LEO expense. Is there actually a precedent where a governmental authority (like a city) did that (LEO agency pursues reimbursement for false claim)?
What would happen if I claimed a couple of black thugs beat me up, even though I paid a couple of white guys to play patty cake with me.
Then I made a huge news story out of it, and defiantly lied on the stand for 2 days? Whatever that result would be, seems fair to give him.
Your ass would be in the clink.
You would not be able to blame it on a red SUV. This is for sure.
White SUVs dont attack people.
Theyre often found at churches.
FJB
CRT says thats not possible.
Absolutely 100% yes.
1) He wasted considerable taxpayer money and resources investigating a fake crime that never happened, entirely because of him and his lies. If it wasn’t for what he did, there never would have been any investigation in the first place, he’s 100% to blame for all of it.
2) A little jail time just might discourage other assholes from doing the same thing.
3) He’s completely unrepentant, in fact he’s still lying. He’s a textbook example of a maladjusted petulant little child in an adult’s body that needs to have his shitty attitude and demeanor corrected.
WCR...The jury found that Jussie Smollett lied. And found him guilty of six felonies. That is permanent, and will never, ever go away. Over time, it will be a stain, his character, his reputation; the stain will be like acid to his soul. Personally, I hope Smollett can come out of it a better man, but that takes a depth of humility I don't think he has.
Would you hire him? I never would. That is not about race. It is all about character.
I hope Smollett can come out of it a better man
Smollett is a sociopath. He's not going to change.
You are probably right, Unicorn. But I hope that I am right.
A co- indictment of Barry -bin- Lyin and Hatelery Clinton.
3 wins!
“Would you hire him? I wouldn’t.”
No, I wouldn’t, but “fast hands” Toobin still has a job, so……
I can see the excuses now….. “Jussie was just trying to shine a light on the very real threat of white supremacy. What didn’t happen to him actually does happen to many disenfranchised minorities without a celebrity profile every day, so his point is well taken.”
He’ll be working again within a year. That’s how retarded things have gotten.
inciting a riot. His fraud was specifically perpetrated to create violence. He's earned at least twenty years for this literal race crime.
He should have been locked up in solitary without access to visitors or lawyers for a year before the trial
Bad news on inflation, good news on redistricting commissions and the bipartisan nature of the results should make them the model and goal for fair minded voters of both or no party.
Is that a dollar-bill condom?
If it ain't a Jefferson, I ain't wearing it.
This is like a parody of liberal governance. 60 pages of rules to keep parklets that the city encouraged restaurants to build.
Why do we keep calling Democratic-run districts "like a parody"? At some point, you call the behavior "natural".
If it's not a parody, then your cries of 'slippery slope fallacy!' were a parody.
It really is simple physics. As long as you ignore the vector and only consider the absolute forward velocity, forward progress is always achieved and there are no slippery slopes.
It's all about a lack of friction, really.
Which guarantees that nobody is satisfied.
you ever throw a toothpick into a volcano?
Is a 90° cliff face "technically" still a slope?
Slope = 1
Thats a wall.
Like we need at the Border
Ain't nothing liberal about that.
Yeah, call it a hunch, but I doubt SF city governance is in the business of making progressivism look stupid.
Remember how I've been banging the drum that just being involved in political boards and races at the local will scare the left more than anything possible, and how they rely on your apathy in order to push their agenda in communities in order to subvert them? Well, this is how they react when you do:
As Critical Race Theory and Mask Mandate Debates Heat Up, Texas GOP Takes Aim at Local School Board and Municipal Races
Patrick Svitek, The Texas Tribune
Fri, December 10, 2021, 8:01 AM
Just a quick note that the Texas Tribune is a shitlib "independent" rag out of Austin that's basically a print version of NPR. If they're sounding the alarm to their fellow traverlers about this, it means that it's more important than ever to start pushing back against this shit at the local level. Remember, these people never, EVER stop unless you make it so uncomfortable for them that they leave for good.
The state Republican Party announced Monday it had formed a new Local Government Committee to work with county parties on backing candidates in nonpartisan local elections, where issues like mask mandates and the teaching of what some conservatives call critical race theory have become flashpoints...
"What some conservatives call..."
Yeaaah... is this the thing that keeps getting denied denied denied, then when the actual texts and lesson plans come out, the press whines that... "well, ok, this unfortunately looks 'like a parody of [_________]'"?
Stop the Steal.
Stop the Steele? Is that still a thing?
Let’s Go Brandon!
Signaling.... dit... dit... dit...
fuck you, Dee
Contribute to my legal defense fund!
Brian Williams closed his 11th Hour program and his extended time with NBC News on Thursday night.
“The truth is I am not a liberal or a conservative. I’m an institutionalist,” Williams said. “I believe in this place and in my love of country I yield to no one. But the darkness on the edge of town has spread to the main roads and highways and neighborhoods. It is now at the local bar and the bowling alley, at the school board and the grocery store. And it must be acknowledged and answered for.”
Grown men and women, who swore an oath to our Constitution, elected by their constituents, possessing the kind of college degrees I could only dream of, have decided to join the mob and become something they are not, while hoping we somehow forget who they were. They’ve decided to burn it all down with us inside.”
https://www.newsbreak.com/n/0dJRAI7y?pd=05vSRvT0&lang=en_US&s=i16
". “I believe in this place and in my love of country I yield to no one."
HAHAHAHAHA BULLSHIT.
Hes an Uncle Tom bowing and scraping at NBC ( Nationalists Broadcasting Communism)
as a Token.
Does that mean that from 2016 to 2021 he was the Token #Resistance?
The Federal Reserve is a PRIVATE COMPANY. If you don't like using their money, start your own central bank!
We can't all be Satoshi Nakamoto.
White SUVs dont attack people.
.They are often found at churches.
I am informed by knowledgeable Democrats that it’s not TRUE inflation.
They'll still be saying it as the West slips into Weimar territory.
You know who else slipped into Weimar territory?
The Weimar Republic?
Jazz great Paul Samuel Whiteman?
He keeps following me around like a lost puppy.
Who was President in 1982 and how did it work out for that guy ?
He won a second term and had dementia. The universe doesn't like you in case you haven't noticed.
Who was President in 1982 and how did it work out for that guy ?
Except Reagan loved the US, and your side objectively hates it.
"Who was President in 1982 and how did it work out for that guy ?"
Have only a vague idea of which steaming pile of shit posted that, but it's the asshole who changes the subject when convenient.
WIH does that have to do with Biden's disastrous policies?
If I remember rightly Reagan started developing Alzheimer's in his second term. Your party deliberately picked a guy who obviously had it beforehand.