OSHA Halts Enforcement of Biden Vaccine Mandate, Pending Litigation
The agency is staying in its lane—for now.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) will not enforce the Biden administration's COVID-19 vaccine mandate, at least until the mandate's legal status is resolved.
The announcement came on Wednesday. OSHA's website now stipulates that while the agency "remains confident in its authority to protect workers in emergencies, OSHA has suspended activities related to the implementation and enforcement of the [COVID-19 Vaccination and Testing Emergency Temporary Standard] pending future developments in the litigation."
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit halted Biden's vaccine mandate, which applies to all private businesses that employ at least 100 people, last week. A three-judge panel described the mandate as "fatally flawed" and "staggeringly broad." Reason Senior Editor Jacob Sullum dove into the legal arguments against the mandate here, while I tackled some of the broader philosophical objections here.
Despite OSHA's certainty that the mandate falls under its authority to keep workplaces safe, it remains to be seen whether the U.S. Supreme Court will agree. This mandate, after all, extends to remote workers who might rarely come into contact with their coworkers, and thus be at little risk of encountering COVID-19 as a workplace hazard (if the disease can even be classified as such).
It's not completely clear that the Biden administration expects the vaccine mandate to hold up in court, but the federal government is clearly keen to push businesses to require vaccination for as long as it possibly can. At least OHSA is standing down—for now.
Editor's Note: As of February 29, 2024, commenting privileges on reason.com posts are limited to Reason Plus subscribers. Past commenters are grandfathered in for a temporary period. Subscribe here to preserve your ability to comment. Your Reason Plus subscription also gives you an ad-free version of reason.com, along with full access to the digital edition and archives of Reason magazine. We request that comments be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment and ban commenters for any reason at any time. Comments may only be edited within 5 minutes of posting. Report abuses.
Please
to post comments
This can't be right.
Not long ago, there was a period of a good few weeks during which the top trending item on Twitter assured me that experts were unanimous — Biden's vaccine mandate is 100% legal.
#LibertariansForBiden
#LibertariansForBigTech
Twitter is the best source for legal advice.
Only the right opinions are left.
Dim Fuk ( Biden) was essentially in Contempt of court for telling OSHA to ' do it anyway.'. ( enforce the mandate)
Making now every month on line extra than $15,000 effortlessly simply by using doing simple activity on line.KJH Last month i have earned and obtained $17942 from this clean task just with the aid of giving this only 2 hrs an afternoon the usage of my pc. Begin incomes online just through follow instructions here......
Feel free to learn more... WorkJoin1
If anyone hasn't read the 5th circuit opinion I highly recommend doing so. I've seen it described as "withering".
https://oshadefensereport.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Fifth-Cir-Stay-Opinion.pdf
Someone (maybe at Volokh?) should help us lay people with the vituperative hierarchy of judicial opinions.
I'm not ashamed to admit that I can't tell a "devastating" opinion from a "withering" opinion from a stern talking-to written down.
I got used to reading legal documents many years ago out of necessity. I have no legal training and I sure don't speak Latin but anybody can understand "lawspeak" with a little practice. This is pretty much plain language with lots of support in precedent, a lot of it right from OSHA. They are taking no prisoners and they are not screwing around. There are no Robbie style toobesures. If a guy like Gorsuch gets his hands on this it's game over.
I think the problem is English. Parsing a meaningful sentence from a single adjective is difficult. A "withering opinion" won't stand up to much, the opposite of "not screwing around" or an opinion that will "cause the mandate to wither".
I agree with what you say, but I must give you some shit here.
"There are no Robbie style toobesures."
The decision literally says, "To be sure," on page 12.
A good Latin - English dictionary can be a real boon when reading classics and technical documents, I find.
Having just read it, I'll go with "quite the beatdown."
Can't wait for midterms!
no need to read past Page 2. Osha got kicked in the nuts by the first paragraph...
So its all on Biden for, without cause, to try and force OSHA to do it.
It's not completely clear that the Biden administration expects the vaccine mandate to hold up in court, but the federal government is clearly keen to push businesses to require vaccination for as long as it possibly can.
Obamacare was a foot in the door, and this is the attempt at the other foot.
And you know they're gonna try to ram it through anyway. Change two words and try to buy time. Again.
So it is still up to individual employers [private corporations] as to whether or not they will have a vaccine mandate? Or does this change that?
I understand that in some health care facilities [in Michigan] quite a few staff have already been "walked off" their jobs for refusing to comply.
My thinking is that states can order mandates or prohibit them. Reason is OK with the former because "police powers" but angry about the latter because "muh private businesses".
Oh and never forget. Fuck Joe Biden.
FJB!!!!
Jill and Joe went out to eat. The Waiter asked Jill:
" For your entree'?"
"She replied " prime rib."
"And for your vegetable?"
"Oh, thats my Husband Joe, just bring him some Applesauce."
Fascists just oshat themselves.
5th threw it back in OSHA's faeces.
good.
Fuck Joe Biden
This is a deep dive into how perversions of the constitution by federal courts have led to the covid tyranny we are enduring from Jacobson v. Massachusetts onward. Well worth the time.
https://libertarianinstitute.org/articles/mandatory-vaccination-and-the-failure-of-modern-constitutional-law/
Doing things FOR us or TO us?
The answer is clear.
Admittedly, it's a tougher call when dealing with something like typhoid or typhus, or any of the other maladies plaguing Gilded Age America, than it is this bug with a...let me find the Ioannidis pre-print...99.73% survival rate at the worst if you're under 60. https://medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.08.21260210v1
Covid's a problem. Still. But it's a problem for the elderly and the obese, and most importantly, it's not a problem that we can eliminate by messing with people who aren't statistically likely to suffer extreme harm from it.
Typhoid Fever? Isn't like that.
> This mandate, after all, extends to remote workers who might rarely come into contact with their coworkers
not in support of the mandates by any stretch, but as a matter of clarity: the OSHA mandate *does* have carve-outs for remote employees, and employees who primarily work outdoors.
On the other hand an OTR truck driver can go months without coming into contact with a coworker.
Also, all the janitors and maintenance workers aren't remote and don't work outdoors but who come in at night when no one's in the office can go fuck themselves.
...might run across Kamala at the Flying J...
But what are they doing about the MonkeyPox? Covid is so last year.
https://patch.com/maryland/baltimore/monkeypox-maryland-resident-confirmed-officials
To say nothing of scorpion attacks.
https://news.sky.com/story/scorpion-stings-kill-three-and-injure-hundreds-more-after-storms-hit-southern-egypt-12467857
Yeah, some serious end-of-days shit there.
Laws don't matter; we have governments of PEOPLE!
"What to know about the safe injection site that could open in San Francisco"
[...]
"The city has considered opening a site for years, and while the federal government and the state do not legally allow injections sites, the city approved legislation last year to authorize a site through an overdose prevention program, KTVU reported..."
https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/safe-injection-site-San-Francisco-16628526.php?IPID=SFGate-HP-CP-Spotlight
Is anyone noticing the gross INCOMPETENCE by the people giving these vaccines?
They are not ASPIRATING.
The vax is for IM ONLY, NOT IV.
They are not ASPIRATING.
Aspiration is optional, not required. Mrs. Casual bruises from mosquito bites, and (despite the irony of her being a healthcare worker, I can definitively say) never once hit a vein. Fair enough to say after hundreds of draws, hundreds of self-injections, hundreds of injections I've got some aptitude. That doesn't explain the fact that at least half of Mrs. Casual's injection are autoinjections, which can't be aspirated. In that regard and in the large, literally billions of auto-injectors, no veins.
We want Brandon
Hi) My name is Paula, I'm 24 years old) Looking for a naughty man to exchange private 18+ pics. If interested, my profile - http://xurl.es/id378955
I am making $165 an hour working from home. i was greatly surprised at the same time as my neighbour advised me she changed into averaging $ninety five however I see the way it works now. I experience masses freedom now that i'm my non-public boss.
that is what I do...... Visit Here